Observe the Universe from Deep Space [NIAC 2023]

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 31 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 55

  • @disinclinedto-state9485
    @disinclinedto-state9485 Рік тому +5

    Such good audio from your interlocutor on this one! Kudos to him for incidentally making it easier on my busted old ears. :)

    • @frasercain
      @frasercain  Рік тому +1

      It's always great when they have good audio on their side.

  • @formarosastudio
    @formarosastudio Рік тому +2

    This was amazing ! What an exciting development and loved the conversation, super techy but still tangible 🙌🏼

    • @frasercain
      @frasercain  Рік тому +2

      Awesome, I'm really glad you enjoyed it.

  • @serbannicolau3489
    @serbannicolau3489 Рік тому +8

    Two interviews in one day! Keep them coming! It's a joy!

  • @dropshot1967
    @dropshot1967 Рік тому +2

    love the concept and the enthusiasm.

  • @johnbennett1465
    @johnbennett1465 Рік тому +3

    Fraser, you need to re-listen to his description of the telescope mission. He said going about 5 AU out of the ecliptic. You feed it back as going past Pluto. I don't know if he missed this or what, since he didn't correct you.
    Great interview, but mistakes like this are easy to make during the interview. You might want to add a review step before publishing to catch things like this.

  • @alphanaut14
    @alphanaut14 Рік тому +2

    I love your NIAC and CubeSat interviews!

  • @anthempt3edits
    @anthempt3edits Рік тому +6

    Another interview! Exactly what I needed. Thanks Fraser!

  • @ronakmist
    @ronakmist Рік тому +3

    This was awesome and I'm sure it'll spur great ideas. Looking forward to part 2!

  • @jamess.2599
    @jamess.2599 Рік тому +1

    My favorite interview

  • @galaxya40s95
    @galaxya40s95 Рік тому +2

    Great as always. Can't wait for part 2.

    • @frasercain
      @frasercain  Рік тому +1

      Next Thursday. 😀

    • @galaxya40s95
      @galaxya40s95 Рік тому

      @@frasercain Awesome!
      Thank you for these interviews, they are a real treat.

  • @DavidTremblay
    @DavidTremblay Рік тому +6

    This NIAC serie of interviews is epic

    • @frasercain
      @frasercain  Рік тому +2

      I'm glad you're enjoying them.

  • @joelwismer
    @joelwismer Рік тому +2

    Absolutely excellent video Fraser ! More interviews like this one please 😊

  • @bernhardjordan9200
    @bernhardjordan9200 Рік тому +3

    That thing can be paired with the solar sail of the other niac grant from the last week?
    If it's possible, how fast it can go?

  • @PetraKann
    @PetraKann Рік тому +2

    Engineers are scientists with a design and technology emphasis which is why an engineering degree is longer than a standard science degree. Usually 4 years compared to 3 years respectively.
    Engineering qualifications are amongst the most difficult and challenging for students to complete.

  • @mitseraffej5812
    @mitseraffej5812 Рік тому +1

    0:42 “ Twelve astronomical unite per year”
    This is approximately 0.018% the speed of light. Fast, but still not going to cut the mustard if we want to go galavanting around the galaxy boldly going where no man has gone before.

  • @michaelkrakenshan
    @michaelkrakenshan Рік тому

    Another very interesting topic and interview. Thanks !

  • @undertow2142
    @undertow2142 Рік тому +1

    The stirling converter NASA has been testing for 14 yrs seems like a great source of enough power. The heat source can be kept far away from everything using molten salts to conduct the heat to the engine.

    • @titanbot11
      @titanbot11 Рік тому

      They want to use a solid state method of power generation to minimize points of failure.

    • @undertow2142
      @undertow2142 Рік тому

      @@titanbot11 14 years continuous operation. It has one moving part.

  • @sarcasmo57
    @sarcasmo57 Рік тому +2

    Hurry up and make it.

    • @frasercain
      @frasercain  Рік тому +2

      Hah, this is phase 2. Next phase 3, then maybe they do a test mission.

  • @Djfmdotcom
    @Djfmdotcom Рік тому +3

    Could the James Webb telescope be tasked to take a picture of Omuamua? (Not an astronomer or astrophysicist)

  • @uuzd4s
    @uuzd4s Рік тому +1

    Question Spacemeister; Presuming that SpaceX's StarShip is online and fully operable in 3 or 4 yrs, It will have a Payload Capacity of 5-10 x that of the Ariane 5 that launched JWST to it's place @ L2.
    So, using the weight and size limit advantages of a rocket like SS, what would your company, Cain Space Telescopes, develop as a Next Gen Space Telescope, what "mission statement" would be the goal and where would you place it ? (No worries, I'll pay for the Launch ; )

  • @Temp0raryName
    @Temp0raryName Рік тому +1

    Some isotopes are stable until they are changed into a shorter-lived isotope. Take that along as a late-stage power source, e.g. a sample return. To be altered when needed. Or, if you can gradually transform the isotope, you can use it to replace the initial isotope, as its half-life reduces its power output below optimal levels, for a given mission.

    • @oberonpanopticon
      @oberonpanopticon Рік тому +1

      Ooo, that’s a cool idea!
      Though the fact that it wouldn’t decay all at once would probably lead to it giving a fairly constant power output. Well, a fairly constantly decreasing power output.

  • @TeethToothman
    @TeethToothman Рік тому

    ❤❤❤

  • @unvergebeneid
    @unvergebeneid Рік тому +4

    Haha, when I read "fastest telescope" I thought it had a huge aperture 😅

  • @jaimeduncan6167
    @jaimeduncan6167 Рік тому +1

    We need numbers. For example performance vs the classic plutonium.

  • @PhonicallyPsychotic
    @PhonicallyPsychotic Рік тому +4

    Isoformers more then meets the nuclei :P

    • @istvansipos9940
      @istvansipos9940 Рік тому

      First, I didn't know which ww2 general I was lookin' at. Then my Patton recognition kicked in.

  • @oberonpanopticon
    @oberonpanopticon Рік тому

    I’m only halfway through the video but I really hope they talk about what isotopes in particular they’d actually be using.

  • @jwwebnaut7045
    @jwwebnaut7045 Рік тому

    Exciting prospects! However, did I miss something or were safety aspects just glossed over? What happens if the start of such a rocket goes wrong or the second stage has to be exploded? Imho these issues need to be addressed before anything else.

  • @michaelmcconnell7302
    @michaelmcconnell7302 Рік тому +3

    This man is proposing we build a Discovery One and I'm here for it. What are the chances of including an AI on the mission? 😁

    • @galaxya40s95
      @galaxya40s95 Рік тому +1

      Not sure we want to send out Von Neumann probes yet 😂

  • @DavidsDreamFactory
    @DavidsDreamFactory Рік тому

    ​What is the event horizon telescope doing these days? we get new images from hubble and jwst pretty consistently but rarely hear about what this "earth sized" telescope is up to

  • @jarihaukilahti
    @jarihaukilahti Рік тому

    What if the rotation of Omuamua actually were part of the craft doing visual interferometry - having their telescopes at both ends of the craft (or one if there is a rocketnozzle at the endpart ). If the craft are 100m long penn then its a 100m? telescope or its a sail with the telescopes in the 4 corners -obviously maybe weaker ones

  • @TroyRubert
    @TroyRubert Рік тому +2

    Seems like the next logical step. Why not send three in different directions and allow it to act as an array?

    • @istvansipos9940
      @istvansipos9940 Рік тому

      budget. That's why. Be glad IF we build 1.

    • @TroyRubert
      @TroyRubert Рік тому

      @@istvansipos9940 these things always end up paying for themselves in the long run. Dare mighty things.

    • @istvansipos9940
      @istvansipos9940 Рік тому

      @@TroyRubert I know. Everybody (those responsible for any budget) knows this, I think. Still, they have the money the have and no more. Which means that, even if they KNOW the long term benefits, they are still limited by their budget. Especially because they have to spend on short term things (f.e. salaries), too.

  • @AvyScottandFlower
    @AvyScottandFlower Рік тому

    Cool concept but I'm afraid any kind of significant speed is gonna mean RAPID deterioration/disassembly of any spacecraft/usable payload, before any kind of appropriate shielding develops, from those first failed attempts
    But a necessary and cool 1st step, still

    • @frasercain
      @frasercain  Рік тому

      It's not relativistic speeds, it's not much different speed compared to the speed that Earth is orbiting the Sun.

    • @AvyScottandFlower
      @AvyScottandFlower Рік тому

      @@frasercain Well I think it might end up being like the effects on JWST, but amplified according to the speed.

  • @takanara7
    @takanara7 Рік тому

    Why not just use more plutonium to get more power? Seems like using a different isotope would make things really complicated, since you need a whole supply line for it.

    • @frasercain
      @frasercain  Рік тому

      It's all about the half-life versus heat output. Different isotopes for different jobs

  • @Raz.C
    @Raz.C Рік тому

    Re - NIAC Grant
    I'd LOVE to get one of those grants!!!!
    I could explore the effects of complete and utter isolation on a person (ie - NO contact with the outside world at all, no TV/ radio/ internet/ phone/ smoke signals/ etc) and how this affects -my- his psyche, especially after 6-month diet of nothing but Heroin and Hookers!!! In the interests of fairness, I could set up my research station in the Sahara desert and try growing crops there, try getting water from the environment, try using both solar and mechanical means of producing energy. I could even extend the H&H diet (Hookers n Heroin) to an entire year before beginning the isolation!!

  • @SajiSNairNair-tu9dk
    @SajiSNairNair-tu9dk 10 місяців тому

    👉human understand one soul is awackaning to universe from 😂🌻🐝