Recommendation for next comparison video: snake the club shot order with 5 shots each. It's not very surprising that the club you hit last felt the best. When I go to the range my best shots are almost always the last ones I hit. Averaging out the data between the first 5 and last 5 should help the Gen 5 out a bit.
Ty for the video ❤ stumbled upon this as researching a Gen 5 and have a friend selling his as he hates it 😂. I subscribed! You guys were fun to watch and more down to earth in the presentation. Nice job! I hit the PXG Sunday and anxious to see how she goes!
This is the exact dilemma I'm dealing with. Great video. I have a fitting next week for the G425 vs the PXG Gen5...and the Paradym. The ROI from the Ping and PXG with an upgraded shaft pretty much rule out any 2023 head. I tip my cap to you guys.
I believe that you really can't determine which is better for you until you test them on a golf course, simulator are fun and give numbers but big difference when playing on a golf course.
So I don’t like the offline number. It seems to be treating left/right as positive/negative numbers which means a 50 yard left miss is offset by a 50 yard block right. I’d like to treat those as absolute values and see the average yards offline to either side… I.e. how much does it spray
Okay, I punched in numbers (I did omit a couple of less than stellar shots so the numbers might be a tiny bit different, but not much. For Tate the average distance offline was: 22.2yds with PXG, 32.8 for TM, and 32.9 for Ping. For Trevor it was 23.9 for PXG, 10.5 for TM, and 14.9 for Ping.
For the test to mean anything, there needs to be robotic testing with the same shaft in all 3 drivers. They're testing what would be best for them in this video.
Why would a robot help anyone know which driver to chose? Nobody’s swing is perfect like a robots would be, so you need to know which driver reacts best to real life swings. Thanks for watching Bart 👍
A robot will give you the raw data on distance, while a player skill or non skill will determine forgiveness. Yes, I do agree if someone is buying a new driver, especially one at $600+, they definitely should demo it first. Robotic testing can give good information on different club head/shaft combinations.
You are no where close to optimized on your numbers. You need more loft and less spin on each of the clubs. The carry on the Ping came from the launch angle, but the spin was way too high. I think you could easily make any of these perform, but I would be interested to see the smash factor on these as well. Good content, but I would love to do some tweaks with your setups, and I bet we could make it just come down to which head feels the best and looks the best for you!
I agree. Specifically on Trevor’s driver he’s too outside in. So instead of trying to tweak a club right now he started lessons over the winter to try to fix that first, before we start club tweaking. That’s the point of our channel, is what kinda works with an imperfect swing. And I agree we will start talking about smash factor
Recommendation for next comparison video: snake the club shot order with 5 shots each. It's not very surprising that the club you hit last felt the best. When I go to the range my best shots are almost always the last ones I hit. Averaging out the data between the first 5 and last 5 should help the Gen 5 out a bit.
Thats a great idea, thanks for the feedback Mark 👌
Love the content, I play PXG Gen 4 irons and a Ping driver. Love them both. I'm local and will swing by sometime to visit your setup.
Awesome!
That ball mark above the screen hits home for me and really sold me on the channel. Immediately smashed the sub button after that 😂
Did that with a driver!
Ty for the video ❤ stumbled upon this as researching a Gen 5 and have a friend selling his as he hates it 😂. I subscribed! You guys were fun to watch and more down to earth in the presentation. Nice job! I hit the PXG Sunday and anxious to see how she goes!
Let us know how you like it! Thanks for watching
This is the exact dilemma I'm dealing with. Great video. I have a fitting next week for the G425 vs the PXG Gen5...and the Paradym. The ROI from the Ping and PXG with an upgraded shaft pretty much rule out any 2023 head. I tip my cap to you guys.
Your not wrong. Thanks for watching and your support Pat 🙌
I believe that you really can't determine which is better for you until you test them on a golf course, simulator are fun and give numbers but big difference when playing on a golf course.
I agree, on course is best. Unfortunately in Denver it’s been way to cold to get out on the course/ range.
hope to see what you think of the Titleist TSR2...plus the PING G430 comes out next month.....cheers from Canada... MERRY CHRISTMAS
We just ordered the G430 from Japan! So should have it early
I tried Stealth, Cobra LTDX and Sim 2 Max and none of them compare to PXG!!!
The PXG is a great club!
So I don’t like the offline number. It seems to be treating left/right as positive/negative numbers which means a 50 yard left miss is offset by a 50 yard block right. I’d like to treat those as absolute values and see the average yards offline to either side… I.e. how much does it spray
Yeah we need to dial that number in on our reviews. Thanks for sharing and watching 🙏
Okay, I punched in numbers (I did omit a couple of less than stellar shots so the numbers might be a tiny bit different, but not much.
For Tate the average distance offline was: 22.2yds with PXG, 32.8 for TM, and 32.9 for Ping.
For Trevor it was 23.9 for PXG, 10.5 for TM, and 14.9 for Ping.
Ive heard of these "single" clubs...driver to PW all in one..😉
Lol 🤣
For the test to mean anything, there needs to be robotic testing with the same shaft in all 3 drivers. They're testing what would be best for them in this video.
Why would a robot help anyone know which driver to chose? Nobody’s swing is perfect like a robots would be, so you need to know which driver reacts best to real life swings.
Thanks for watching Bart 👍
A robot will give you the raw data on distance, while a player skill or non skill will determine forgiveness. Yes, I do agree if someone is buying a new driver, especially one at $600+, they definitely should demo it first. Robotic testing can give good information on different club head/shaft combinations.
Keep the videos coming!
Will do
For me I don’t need new drivers as long as u hitting it fairway 90% of the time , that’s all matters ..
Very solid point
You are no where close to optimized on your numbers. You need more loft and less spin on each of the clubs. The carry on the Ping came from the launch angle, but the spin was way too high. I think you could easily make any of these perform, but I would be interested to see the smash factor on these as well. Good content, but I would love to do some tweaks with your setups, and I bet we could make it just come down to which head feels the best and looks the best for you!
I agree. Specifically on Trevor’s driver he’s too outside in. So instead of trying to tweak a club right now he started lessons over the winter to try to fix that first, before we start club tweaking. That’s the point of our channel, is what kinda works with an imperfect swing. And I agree we will start talking about smash factor
That is chunky Tom Cruise. Can’t convince me otherwise
Lol, thanks OnePunchBobby 😂
One punch with 4 pieces of cake? 😏
Craziness! Distance every time. You’ll get used to that driver. You’re hitting these all for the first time. Come on!!!
we are working on it
Remember the cost. The other two clubs are twice as much in costs.
That is a very good point!
Lmao thats my shot baby fade, more like a slice, you couldn’t play Uk courses with that much movement from left to right
Thanks for sharing Ginger, we'll be out there in a few months shooting some content. We'll have to see how it goes 🙌🏼
I hit my gen 5 farther than any other driver I’ve tried
I really liked the Gen 5 driver. Thanks for watching
Gen5 is loud
I really wanted to like this video, but nobody with any common sense leaves a 12-yard drive in the data. Sorry guys.
Thanks for watching