Isn't the conclusion at 9:50 falling into the very same trap that Carl Sagan did with the digits of pi? I don't really see any differences in the lines of reasoning.
He is implying that not only the physics van be set arbitrarily but also the mathematical structures themseves could change. And the whole point of this series is to see what happens if mathematics is found or invenvented is different order. Would different results be found or the same?
Actually, there probably *is* a picture of a circle encoded somewhere in the digits of pi.
Why did humanity started with an amazingly precise base 60 system though? Are we dumbing down our specie?
Isn't the conclusion at 9:50 falling into the very same trap that Carl Sagan did with the digits of pi? I don't really see any differences in the lines of reasoning.
He is implying that not only the physics van be set arbitrarily but also the mathematical structures themseves could change.
And the whole point of this series is to see what happens if mathematics is found or invenvented is different order. Would different results be found or the same?
so how about the andromican politicians could they by nuts but still technological?