Jim Coplien is definitely the speaker whose ideas are worth my attention. I like his way of challenging our assumptions about patterns, symmetry and programming in general.
That is exactly what it is. I've also come to realize that it's like Christopher Alexander's pattern languages, with each context being a pattern and the roles being the objects within the language.
Good thinking and ideas worth attention, but down-voted. we use DDD to around expertise of people to scale the organization in first place, otherwise it would be a chaos to try build complex product and focus only on use cases. Eventually you'll have to go with hierarchical sub-domains just because every human being has limitations to the mental capacity and productivity. Then, too much critics, where are proposals?
Sergii Semenov I suppose (from the talk) you’d need to focus on how to “compress” instead of implement heirachy - like the brain does? I don’t have an answer haha. But that’s the conclusion worth exploring.
!['A Glimpse of Trygve: From Class-oriented Programming to Real OO' - Jim Coplien [ ACCU 2016 ]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/lQQ_CahFVzw/mqdefault.jpg)
Jim Coplien is definitely the speaker whose ideas are worth my attention. I like his way of challenging our assumptions about patterns, symmetry and programming in general.
I really like Jim and his unabashed destruction of conferences and their other speakers.
so we can implement roles using typeclass in haskell ?
At a high level, DCI sounds like Systems Thinking applied to OO.
That is exactly what it is.
I've also come to realize that it's like Christopher Alexander's pattern languages, with each context being a pattern and the roles being the objects within the language.
Good thinking and ideas worth attention, but down-voted. we use DDD to around expertise of people to scale the organization in first place, otherwise it would be a chaos to try build complex product and focus only on use cases. Eventually you'll have to go with hierarchical sub-domains just because every human being has limitations to the mental capacity and productivity. Then, too much critics, where are proposals?
Sergii Semenov I suppose (from the talk) you’d need to focus on how to “compress” instead of implement heirachy - like the brain does? I don’t have an answer haha. But that’s the conclusion worth exploring.