Has anybody noticed that the meaning of the word "platform" has changed in recent years? Indeed, the term "platform" as defined in the book "Team topologies" and as used in this talk is different from the what it used to mean a couple of years ago. Specifically, platform no longer means platform as in "PaaS". Rather, anything that can be provided as a service counts as a platform nowadays. So not only PaaS but also IaaS (Kubernetes etc), SaaS, DBaaS and APIaaS (web APIs etc) are all possible outputs of platform teams.
Thanks for sharing, this is making me need to prepare myself for next generation of "Devops" event actually we're trying to build like you said reduce ticket ops / give abilities to devs to self service. :)
Questions ,What happen if they need share components? Who or which platform engineer response ? Logging ? Monitoring? CICD tools? Unless all platform enginee to have same knowledge to all infra layer tools or paid a very high cost for using vendor solutions and then start to have vendor lock-in Or company does allow different team can have different tools but it will easily create gap for different team?
I dislike clickbait titles as well, however I’m not upset about it for these three reasons; he explained the truth of it in the first 28 seconds, there are positive reviews in the comments specifically praising the content despite the clickbait, and lastly this is a reputable channel of which I am very interested in learning about industry trends from.
I mean that's the title of his presentation. So I'm not sure it's worth reporting. Just because the presentation doesn't reflect what's stated in its title, doesn't mean the video's title can't be the presentation's title. Just saying
![CNCF [Cloud Native Computing Foundation]](http://yt3.ggpht.com/txe66EjpkDQQlx_4jDV0yA0PPsww0rqQrFhMpDqagLWN2-EUBBO65IuIyy5tEFVmpI4_RRduzXc=s48-c-k-c0x00ffffff-no-rj)
Came for the title, stayed for the content. Thanks for sharing!
Has anybody noticed that the meaning of the word "platform" has changed in recent years? Indeed, the term "platform" as defined in the book "Team topologies" and as used in this talk is different from the what it used to mean a couple of years ago. Specifically, platform no longer means platform as in "PaaS". Rather, anything that can be provided as a service counts as a platform nowadays. So not only PaaS but also IaaS (Kubernetes etc), SaaS, DBaaS and APIaaS (web APIs etc) are all possible outputs of platform teams.
Thanks for sharing, this is making me need to prepare myself for next generation of "Devops" event actually we're trying to build like you said reduce ticket ops / give abilities to devs to self service. :)
whatever it is, this kind of a job/work... is really fit me. i always ready for change, in fact... i can't wait for another kind of "devops" 😆.
What was the open source software you mentioned? Score?
There’s goes 26 mins of my life I’ll never get back! Dude didn’t say anything we didn’t already know
Questions ,What happen if they need share components?
Who or which platform engineer response ?
Logging ? Monitoring? CICD tools?
Unless all platform enginee to have same knowledge to all infra layer tools or
paid a very high cost for using vendor solutions and then start to have vendor lock-in
Or
company does allow different team can have different tools but it will easily create gap for different team?
gitops+any sever+auto image build+any language would be best.
nice click bait
Usual clickbait title. Reported. And if DevOps is dead, let developers or testers do the Platform Engineering.
I dislike clickbait titles as well, however I’m not upset about it for these three reasons; he explained the truth of it in the first 28 seconds, there are positive reviews in the comments specifically praising the content despite the clickbait, and lastly this is a reputable channel of which I am very interested in learning about industry trends from.
@@unspkn4thz so, you tell a lie in your title just for people to go and click on the video so you can say the truth? Disgusting
I mean that's the title of his presentation. So I'm not sure it's worth reporting. Just because the presentation doesn't reflect what's stated in its title, doesn't mean the video's title can't be the presentation's title. Just saying