Idk, unless you've either interviewed alot and realize they bring up doing police reports alot, or you've been one yourself, and realized even the smaller calls that still need reports like "I misplaced my watch" ect it's still alot of papperwork needed to be filled out. Officer401 on yt explains it very easily. That's one reason he left city and went county
Actually, this sounds like a good/smart application for AI. (As long as it's instantly reviewed for both accuracy and completeness by the cop. It's JUST his/her technical _assistant_ - the cop must know and act like they are themselves 100% responsible for every last thing about it, including any omissions, even minor ones.) I can't imagine even dealing with the small mountain of pure _paperwork_ that a typical cop has to f'ing grind out each week.
Sounds like it is just transcribing the audio rather than writing what happened during the events of the stop. Sounds fine, but just hiring transcription people on the past would have been equivalent.
@@TheGremalin I'm not saying they should do it if this transcription software works well. I'm saying it would have saved officers time in the past. Professional transcription services would be a lot faster than officers doing it.
@TheGremalin from the video, they said it's just transcribing the audio and helping fill in that aspect of the report. It didn't say it fills in a complete description of the events of the interaction.
Anyone who had a case touched by AI in any way should have their charges dismissed.
whole life is touched by AI :)
So when the report is full of mistruths they can just blame the computer?
ofc not, when he needs to read and sign it :)
Defense attorneys are gonna love this
Man police are getting lazy
Getting?
Idk, unless you've either interviewed alot and realize they bring up doing police reports alot, or you've been one yourself, and realized even the smaller calls that still need reports like "I misplaced my watch" ect it's still alot of papperwork needed to be filled out. Officer401 on yt explains it very easily. That's one reason he left city and went county
Sue every department that uses this!!!
Still don't like the turn off button 😒 or the mute button
This is going to be like when cops stopped having to beat black people up when they rolled out bodycams. It will be the damdest thing.
Actually, this sounds like a good/smart application for AI. (As long as it's instantly reviewed for both accuracy and completeness by the cop. It's JUST his/her technical _assistant_ - the cop must know and act like they are themselves 100% responsible for every last thing about it, including any omissions, even minor ones.)
I can't imagine even dealing with the small mountain of pure _paperwork_ that a typical cop has to f'ing grind out each week.
Sounds like it is just transcribing the audio rather than writing what happened during the events of the stop. Sounds fine, but just hiring transcription people on the past would have been equivalent.
that would completely render the point of the software redundant and an extra step wasting time.
@@TheGremalin I'm not saying they should do it if this transcription software works well. I'm saying it would have saved officers time in the past. Professional transcription services would be a lot faster than officers doing it.
@@timthorson52 That's completely different than AI. Thats not ehat is at play here.
@TheGremalin from the video, they said it's just transcribing the audio and helping fill in that aspect of the report. It didn't say it fills in a complete description of the events of the interaction.
AI-assisted = all good by me.
AI-only = unacceptable.
cause would do anything better?
Great, now cops can accuse the AI of being a lying crapsack, instead of the usual.
No editing.