КОМЕНТАРІ •

  • @ZUPRA9050
    @ZUPRA9050 3 роки тому +15

    When lambo?

  • @tas3159
    @tas3159 2 роки тому +6

    "it works because it doesn't work", excellent!

  • @trustmebro703
    @trustmebro703 3 роки тому +9

    Answer to the math trick: binary. Contains =1 not contains = 0. Number of various mutations :2^6=64. You don’t need a math PhD for that.

  • @samidelhi6150
    @samidelhi6150 4 роки тому +2

    Great Exposition

  • @prateeksaini1304
    @prateeksaini1304 3 місяці тому

    Do you think that algo trading can remove the edge of momentum strategies eventually. Because all the algos will be chasing similar kind of strategies.

  • @sleepless2541
    @sleepless2541 Рік тому +1

    21:42

  • @samidelhi6150
    @samidelhi6150 4 роки тому +3

    But the issue is that these are not-money effecient strategies / investment paradigms relative to say long-short insurance / options strategies

  • @Rohit-oz1or
    @Rohit-oz1or 5 років тому +3

    15:00 Don't Hedge Funds arbitrage momentum? They won't appear in this ETF study...

  • @JKonFilm
    @JKonFilm 3 роки тому

    yurr

  • @6toolbaseball
    @6toolbaseball Рік тому

    Glad I chose QMOM over MTUM 😂

  • @bonob0123
    @bonob0123 4 роки тому +14

    lot of salty ex-academics giving talks on youtube. just do your thing, why so much hate towards academics? they do their thing, no one is twisting your arm to use their "useless" idealized models. if you misinterpret an idealized model, thats on you.

    • @willrocksBR
      @willrocksBR 4 роки тому +19

      You must not be an academic then, because they SHOULD welcome scrutiny. That's how knowledge progresses, not through echo chambers.