Top Attack 155 BONUS In Ukraine

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 5 січ 2023
  • On 4 January photos of a 155 BONUS submunition were shared by a Russian Telegram channel. In this video we take a look at this interesting top-attack munition and it's capabilities.
    Be sure to check out our accompanying article for this video here -
    armourersbench.com/2023/01/06...
    If you enjoy our work please consider supporting us via Patreon, TAB is a viewer supported channel and any help is very much appreciated! We have some great new perks, check out our Patreon page here: / thearmourersbench
    You can also now support us with one-time donations via ko-fi.com/armourersbench
    Ever wished all the best gun history content creators were gathered in one place? Check out - surplused.com - we're on there!
    Where to find TAB:
    armourersbench.com
    / armourersbench
    ko-fi.com/armourersbench
    / thearmourersbench
    / armourersbench
    utreon.com/c/Armourers-Bench
    imgur.com/user/ArmourersBench
    / discord
  • Розваги

КОМЕНТАРІ • 1,4 тис.

  • @TheArmourersBench
    @TheArmourersBench  Рік тому +46

    Thanks for watching everyone. Be sure to check out our accompanying article for this video here -
    armourersbench.com/2023/01/06/top-attack-155-bonus-in-ukraine/. Thanks - Matt

    • @KillerCuddles-fc6kg
      @KillerCuddles-fc6kg Рік тому

      USA needs to stop supporting both sides of this war.
      ....
      Pick a side or GTFO

    • @TheArmourersBench
      @TheArmourersBench  Рік тому

      And how is the US supporting Russia my dude?

    • @KillerCuddles-fc6kg
      @KillerCuddles-fc6kg Рік тому +3

      @@TheArmourersBench russia's total GDP is 65% oil.
      If we started pumping in USA, it would drop gas prices and actually have an effect on russian economy... . . Instead we are buying russian oil indirectly... They are sanctioned and have to sell for less, but they are still making loads of money because Brandon jacked up the prices so high. it's his greatest accomplishment.. The Saudi's are loving this war

    • @ttp_007
      @ttp_007 Рік тому +2

      Designers failed to develop a detonation chamber into the electronic brains of the Bonus 155mm to prevent enemies from finding and studying it.

    • @victor6814
      @victor6814 Рік тому

      ​@@ttp_007 source ?

  • @FXGreggan.
    @FXGreggan. Рік тому +331

    I don't know if they have the same charge but are also available for 120mm mortar named STRIX. Just imagine how devestating a mortar team can be on advancing armor...

    • @SonsOfLorgar
      @SonsOfLorgar Рік тому +47

      Yup, and that one has a solid state rocket booster option too, extending the range from 7km to almost 9km...
      (I've fired them myself in trsining back in 2003)

    • @tbrowniscool
      @tbrowniscool Рік тому +36

      It's amazing, fucking awful to face. Even knowing these exist will make tank crews cry (This doesn't include Russians, they are told they are wiping out Nazi's, they are happy with dying for nothing)

    • @mostlymessingabout
      @mostlymessingabout Рік тому

      @@SonsOfLorgar STRIX is laser guided only right?

    • @sparrow9990
      @sparrow9990 Рік тому +10

      Oh God imagine the Amos using this thing

    • @uniformmike05
      @uniformmike05 Рік тому +5

      The 120mm STRIX is a terminally guided mortar round with a HEAT warhead, it’s guided by heat signature of a target. Its effect on a target is devastating.

  • @_Saracen_
    @_Saracen_ Рік тому +110

    Good lord, I'm both terrified and impressed.

    • @OpenGL4ever
      @OpenGL4ever Рік тому +14

      Before the Ukraine war, I didn't even know that such ammunition even existed. Projectiles that steer to the target at the end of their flight, yes, I thought of something like that, but definitely not of those parachute things that then calmly look for the target within a radius of 200 m and only then destroy it.

    • @vladimirassalukas6726
      @vladimirassalukas6726 Рік тому

      @@OpenGL4ever it is electronics, EMI probably will damage it quite good, it is interesting how RF conteract such type of armory. i tend to believe they have type of weapon for that case, it is stupid to think, who have rocketery that fly over land and hit marketed targets, do not have anything against such toys :)

    • @Flumphinator
      @Flumphinator Рік тому +4

      @@vladimirassalukas6726 looks like the entire thing is shielded.

    • @dnate697
      @dnate697 18 днів тому

      Like 100:)

  • @Case16710
    @Case16710 Рік тому +143

    And now it’s time for the BONUS Round!

    • @beardymcbeardface69
      @beardymcbeardface69 Рік тому +19

      Tell 'em what they've won Ron!
      *_IT'S_* *_A_* *_NEW_* *_COFFIN!_*

    • @certaindeath7776
      @certaindeath7776 Рік тому +8

      @@beardymcbeardface69 good old soviet steel coffins, where the incineration of the bodies is icluded feature in the ammo storage below the turret crew.
      So russian goverment can tell its people: "na they did not die, we just cant find them anymore, im sure they are there somewhere. we only lost 10k men"

    • @telemachin
      @telemachin Рік тому +1

      You have to say it with a french accent. 🥖

    • @1337fraggzb00N
      @1337fraggzb00N Рік тому +2

      @@beardymcbeardface69 but wait! There's more!

  • @dragonsbreath1984
    @dragonsbreath1984 Рік тому +608

    The US used to have these in our arsenal. They were called SADARM and they were quite nasty. The submunitions could talk to each other so they wouldn’t double task on the same target. And, they could also modify their explosive effect to either frag for soft targets and infantry or they could jet for top armor attack. The Army and Marine Corps lost these munitions due to political in-fighting with the Air Force. The argument was that the SADARM capability crept into the Air Force core mission of tactical air support.

    • @Revener666
      @Revener666 Рік тому +203

      Well that is an irrellevant argument is I've ever heard one.

    • @asdsdjfasdjxajiosdqw8791
      @asdsdjfasdjxajiosdqw8791 Рік тому +89

      If they are still sat in a warehouse somewhere they should defo be sent to Ukraine.

    • @aloeisthestuff9622
      @aloeisthestuff9622 Рік тому

      Sounds like the Stupid US.

    • @piprix4293
      @piprix4293 Рік тому +77

      wow weird logic if true, but idk knowing military bureaucracy it can be a circus
      imagine then armies shouldn’t field artillery or mortars or surveillance drones or tanks since their jobs can be done by aircraft…..

    • @user-vp9lc9up6v
      @user-vp9lc9up6v Рік тому +10

      @@Revener666 everything sort of has its purpose, just like how Marine and Army attack helicopters operate differently in support of an element

  • @lando8913
    @lando8913 Рік тому +70

    I'm really surprised how far it can shoot that jet and still pierce thick armor. Impressive all around.

    • @professionalfire3902
      @professionalfire3902 Рік тому +16

      It's not a jet like HEAT shells. It's a roughly-formed metal 'slug'. So it works as a kinetic penetrator.

    • @juhanivalimaki5418
      @juhanivalimaki5418 Рік тому

      "Still pierce", actually that's another explosive ignited like 100m from the tank, carried chemical energy, so it's not surprising. But I regard surprising, that despite of the recoil of that second explosion in the air, the kinetic penetrator still keeps the correct aim.

    • @chost-059
      @chost-059 11 місяців тому +2

      ​@@professionalfire3902 thats also what HEAT is

    • @professionalfire3902
      @professionalfire3902 11 місяців тому +1

      @@chost-059 It's the same principle, just different angles (amongst other things).

    • @ackerkartoffel8627
      @ackerkartoffel8627 4 місяці тому

      how do you shoot a slug without a barrel?​@@professionalfire3902

  • @mattfleming86
    @mattfleming86 Рік тому +175

    I'm most impressed with the accuracy, stability, and range of that EFP. It appears it can reach as far as 200m by the one diagram? In the footage they are quite high when they pop. Long range AND fired while spinning rapidly well above the target. Well done.

    • @kristofferkaaling8795
      @kristofferkaaling8795 Рік тому +13

      It's the target zone, 200 meters in diameter it can hit anything. So the artillery folks need to know where about the tank or other vehicles are and fire on them and the Bonus goes after the vehicle that the crew have designated as a target.

    • @mattfleming86
      @mattfleming86 Рік тому +3

      @@kristofferkaaling8795 If the radius of the "zone" is 200m, then one would assume that even with a WIDE wobble creating a broad detection cone, that the efp could potentially fire from up to a couple hundred meters away. That said objects on the very outside edge of that zone may be more of a hail-mary pass with impact velocity going up as the target approaches the center of the cone.

    • @kristofferkaaling8795
      @kristofferkaaling8795 Рік тому +5

      @@mattfleming86 the round it self goes far out. You do not use an artillery system to reach 200m out. The range of the bonus round is 35km.

    • @kristofferkaaling8795
      @kristofferkaaling8795 Рік тому +1

      @@mattfleming86 just Google the thing. No use in arguing about it here.

    • @zoiders
      @zoiders Рік тому +2

      You mean the footprint of each munitions sensor which is roughly 178x178 meters.

  • @exo068
    @exo068 Рік тому +367

    SMArt 155 also uses a millimeter wave radar both passiv and active. Thanks to that it can’t be stopped detecting the target even if it has reduced thermal signature or is hiding in multi spectral smoke.

    • @TheArmourersBench
      @TheArmourersBench  Рік тому +36

      Yes I believe it does. There's been a few videos suggested to be it but never ones I would consider conclusive. Another capable system.

    • @Mr.Chlorophil
      @Mr.Chlorophil Рік тому +10

      @@TheArmourersBench Most likely. Lida is easily affected by dense fog, rain and snow, unlike the milimeter radar.

    • @TheArmourersBench
      @TheArmourersBench  Рік тому +18

      I believe Brimstone uses mmw too.

    • @exo068
      @exo068 Рік тому +4

      @@TheArmourersBench yes but it’s way more powerful and the largest versions can also be laser guided.

    • @Mr.Chlorophil
      @Mr.Chlorophil Рік тому +18

      Ther german article regarding smart155 is much more detailed than the english one: "The two submunitions spiraling down the parachute autonomously scan the target area for targets with their triple seeker sensors. The sensor algorithm is said to be able to detect armored combat vehicles, distinguish them from false targets and engage them even under difficult environmental and weather conditions"

  • @brendanmeyler1641
    @brendanmeyler1641 Рік тому +44

    It’s amazing how it can conduct targeting while spinning so rapidly and shoot the jet so accurately from such a distance and it still be effective.

    • @sillysad3198
      @sillysad3198 Рік тому +6

      actually spinning the whole machine at a known rate simplifies the targeting mech. and is used in rocketry since the very first "seeking" missile (when the electronics of the time could not solve the targeting task without spinning)

    • @tikitaka1148
      @tikitaka1148 Рік тому +1

      Everything is possible when its not human

    • @sillysad3198
      @sillysad3198 Рік тому +4

      @@the.bog. it doesn't "eliminate" an axis, it converts the coordinate system into a polar coordinate system (all dimentions preserved) which eliminates the ARTIFACT-rotation that inevitably emerges from the composition of course corrections expressed in a cartesian system.

    • @sillysad3198
      @sillysad3198 Рік тому +1

      @@the.bog. btw, the ground radar systems (albeit unable to spin as easily as rockets) also spin around the axis of the beam!
      (usually by rotating the polarisation of the beam)

    • @drobichaud1000
      @drobichaud1000 Рік тому

      @@sillysad3198 Shut up sad

  • @JMiskovsky
    @JMiskovsky Рік тому +294

    IT would be expensive but : Whole bettery of Pz2000 could in minute anhilate whole tank brigade.

    • @prfwrx2497
      @prfwrx2497 Рік тому +80

      Compared to the tanks destroyed, it's nothing.

    • @tielemaniak
      @tielemaniak Рік тому +33

      We use the SMArt 155, not the BONUS. Similar concept.

    • @ame7165
      @ame7165 Рік тому +20

      these would be prefect for the russian/belarussian front from the north if that ever happens

    • @HingerlAlois
      @HingerlAlois Рік тому +43

      Germany delivered SMArt 155 which are very similar. The German submunitions use parachutes and scan with infrared sensors and a radar for targets around them.

    • @IFarmBugs
      @IFarmBugs Рік тому +1

      That is exactly how Ukraine can spearhead pretty much anywhere it wants, we have an upper hand in precision artillery systems. The possibly to end the war this year is there. But unfortunately AFU high command is inept and does not use resources properly. If the war ends then how will Zelenksy and his jews make money?

  • @JamesLaserpimpWalsh
    @JamesLaserpimpWalsh Рік тому +61

    Bonus is such a wicked name for it. Thanks for the vid.

    • @LordOceanus
      @LordOceanus Рік тому +15

      Congratulations Russian soldier we have a BONUS surprise for you! Step outside and see what you've OneFiveFive!

    • @UserUser-ww2nj
      @UserUser-ww2nj Рік тому +5

      @@LordOceanus And the bonus question is
      How long can you stay alive ?

    • @andresmartinezramos7513
      @andresmartinezramos7513 Рік тому

      @@LordOceanus If he steps outside the vehicle, he MIGHT have a chance

    • @alex-ragnarson3482
      @alex-ragnarson3482 Рік тому +2

      BOfors NUtating Shells is the name, 22000 euros piece

  • @jools2323
    @jools2323 Рік тому +120

    I'm pleased I'm too old to be a soldier.

    • @J-DDR3I
      @J-DDR3I Рік тому +5

      I'm fro that the insurgents in Afganistan didn't have drones!

    • @aloeisthestuff9622
      @aloeisthestuff9622 Рік тому +21

      Not in Russia.

    • @VickersDoorter
      @VickersDoorter Рік тому +5

      @@aloeisthestuff9622 You beat me to it.

    • @tigerpjm
      @tigerpjm Рік тому +5

      Yeah, I'm ex (Australian) tank crew.
      I'm glad I'm out of those tin-can death traps. Can't believe I felt so invulnerable in them!

    • @tomwi_since2015
      @tomwi_since2015 Рік тому +2

      And the saddest thing is, it really has to be us! the human race will never learn ! there will always be wars as long as there are people. even after the worst wars in this world, global peace only lasted for two or three generations. people forget very quickly when the generations that have experienced these terrible things first hand are gone. the reasons are always the same.

  • @maxbowen6482
    @maxbowen6482 Рік тому +17

    Like a cute little orbital strike satellite

  • @cmh6122
    @cmh6122 Рік тому +63

    Spent three years with a M109a3 battalion at Ft Sill after OCS and FAOBC. Too see the things we tested coming to fruition almost 4 decades later is proof that Artillery is the King of Battle.

    • @bradcloud7670
      @bradcloud7670 Рік тому +5

      This thing is an unbelievably powered weapon system. About 20 years ago, I saw a "Future Weapons" (show) episode where they showcased some of this technology. It was a cluster munition missile though. It was said to be a "13 stage weapon" It deployed many sub-munitions, that then deployed more, that oscillated, tracked, communicated between each other, and used EFPs as well.
      It was said to be used to destroy entire armoured columns. However being a cluster munition I dont think it was legal. It was very cool to see brought into the 155MM BONUS system. I think this gives it a great ability to be used on smaller scale and be upscalled as required (fired from a battery of artillery at the time),
      The only downside i can see is the 35km range but that still is good. One person mentioned putting it on the HIMARS or MRLS. Makes you not want to be inside that tank!
      If you saw any of the Armenian/Azerbaijan war, they used small drones that targeted enemy armor and towards the mid/end you would see guys refusing to be around vehicles, and super spread out, because they would also bomb groups of soldiers.
      I cant imagine being in that position.... Fuck war.

    • @tarkitarker0815
      @tarkitarker0815 Рік тому

      dude, you were a us dude, you did test shit with bofors or rheinmetall subammo. also, albeit you might thinking you us americans were the ones with the idea, you werent.

    • @tarkitarker0815
      @tarkitarker0815 Рік тому

      @@bradcloud7670 bonus actually is just as old as the us cluster ammo you have seen, the us were neither the first on it, nor the ones bringing the 2nd gen tech.

    • @bradcloud7670
      @bradcloud7670 Рік тому

      @@tarkitarker0815 Yes I am aware BONUS is very old. I just wasnt aware that it used EFPs. From what I understood years ago, it was just a highly accurate 155MM round.
      Has it always used EFPs?

    • @tarkitarker0815
      @tarkitarker0815 Рік тому

      @@bradcloud7670 yes, it was always a projectile without an explosive load, or more like, without a explosive load that is meant to directly damage. there were many demonstrations against bonus and smart as they are effectively clusterbombs that fit into a only somewhat legal spot.

  • @19MAD95
    @19MAD95 Рік тому +38

    This is one of that most amazing engineering feats.

    • @carlwheezerofsouls3273
      @carlwheezerofsouls3273 Рік тому +4

      its like shooting a 3 stage rocket at the enemy, this is practically rocket science.

    • @ryananggoro493
      @ryananggoro493 Рік тому

      They even built smart ammo for small caliber gun which can chase human target

    • @John-mf6ky
      @John-mf6ky Місяць тому

      Explosives, mines, grenades, trip wires, uxo are terrifying tbh

  • @jdogdarkness
    @jdogdarkness Рік тому +5

    Great video. I love that you took the time to find the company's demonstration video. So often is that not included in videos.

  • @paulosabib
    @paulosabib Рік тому +121

    I remember very well a Q&A question for the Chieftain about what he feared the most, where he complained about those types of ammunition: "What am I supposed against it?" He asked...

    • @brettbaker5599
      @brettbaker5599 Рік тому +73

      @Peter T Except your unit has to have one, and have it emitting when you get fired on......

    • @simonmoorcroft1417
      @simonmoorcroft1417 Рік тому +92

      @Peter T No one is towing a C-RAM on its 40ft trailer around on the battlefield though are they Peter???

    • @kubagra456
      @kubagra456 Рік тому +33

      @Peter T Yeah... now protect every tank (expesically ones close to frontline) with C-RAM aganist chance of getting hit by rare 100k USD round while being any country that isnt USA

    • @schmiddy8433
      @schmiddy8433 Рік тому +30

      @Peter T oh yeah let me just mount a whole ass CIWS to the top of my tank lmfao

    • @UserUser-ww2nj
      @UserUser-ww2nj Рік тому

      @@schmiddy8433 Harsh but true 😂😂😂

  • @nylarnameless1759
    @nylarnameless1759 8 місяців тому +1

    Commented on a diff video about these early french weapon photos. Your on point

  • @kebman
    @kebman Рік тому +21

    Bofors: Swedish Metal. They know guns since forever.

    • @Sun-Tzu-
      @Sun-Tzu- 2 місяці тому

      They were bought out.

  • @jamesjross
    @jamesjross Рік тому +70

    Wow do they communicate with each other to select different targets? also that seemed to fire at an angle (while doing 900 rpm). It's crazy that this was developed in the late 80s.

    • @nunyadambusiness6902
      @nunyadambusiness6902 Рік тому +7

      No, but the hornet minefield system uses the same principle with up to 6 or 8 mines & the computerized system picks a target for EACH before it fires them... 🔥...

    • @danielsestina6457
      @danielsestina6457 Рік тому +7

      @@nunyadambusiness6902 yeah the original murder Hornets... those things were highly unpredictable though. I was a Combat Engineer for several years. The m93 was a great concept but bad in actual practice.

    • @jackmclane1826
      @jackmclane1826 Рік тому +11

      No they don't. I don't know for sure with THESE here, but the pretty much identical German variant "SmArt 155" does not. Natural dispersion when releasing the Submunitions from the shell case makes sure that they find different target areas on their own. One is in the high speed drag a splitsecond earlier and falls shorter.
      This is not a shell to target an individual tank anyway. It is fired in dozens, when you know the position of a tank battalion in a certain area.

    • @certaindeath7776
      @certaindeath7776 Рік тому +5

      i bet theese projectiles will also hit civilian vehicles, if present. but with the 200metres cones of effect, you will be firing those only at areas, where you know there are tanks anyway.

    • @jackmclane1826
      @jackmclane1826 Рік тому +10

      @@certaindeath7776 I haven't tested it myself obviously, but at least the German variant "SmArt155" is supposed not to target civilian vehicles. It is supposedly capable to distinguish between different types of tanks according to one of the developers of the round that I had the chance to talk to years ago. I forgot how they do it, as it was pretty insane and I didn't really understand it.
      With weapons like that it is always unclear which tech levels were suggested as possible by the engineers, which were actually realized and which one was actually put into service at the end.

  • @davidphillips8674
    @davidphillips8674 Рік тому +30

    I've been subjected to the copper explosively formed projectiles used in these rounds when I was in Iraq. Its devastating and also terrifying once you know what they can do. We're talking a molten copper projectile going mach 20 right at you, and whats left over is not pretty( i was a medic)

    • @SilvaDreams
      @SilvaDreams Рік тому

      Welcome to human flesh meeting a HEAT shell. Does wonders against armor and not so wonderous things to the human body.

    • @haley746
      @haley746 Рік тому +2

      HEAT shells (I'm assuming RPGs in your case) are not EFPs, and molten copper is a myth (melting temp of copper < melting temp of steel, so it will not help penetrate armour). It's the sheer energy of the shaped charge explosion that does the most damage

    • @SilvaDreams
      @SilvaDreams Рік тому +2

      @@haley746 It's the focused shockwave of the high explosive that liquifies the copper focusing cone as well as the steal ((and other layered armor) that gets sprayed into the crew compartment of the tank. So no it is not the copper itself ""melting" it's way through so much as it's just being turned into a jet of molten copper and steel purely from the pressure which creates the heat.

    • @jarkkohaimakainen2378
      @jarkkohaimakainen2378 4 місяці тому

      @@SilvaDreams EFP's don't necessarily liquefy the "squirted" copper lining when ignited:
      "the copper jets are well below the melting point of copper. However, these temperatures are not completely consistent with evidence that soft recovered copper jet particles show signs of melting at the core"
      Tantalum is superior to copper when it comes to effectiveness of EFP lining materials and tantalum's melting point (3017 °C) is much higher than that of copper (1084.62 °C):
      "it was found tantalum is superior to copper, due to its much higher density and very high ductility at high strain rates."
      A very ductile metal might "behave as a mix of both", liquid and solid, in EFP applications (maybe some form of plasma jet).

    • @HanSolo__
      @HanSolo__ 27 днів тому

      HEAT just like APFSDS works on the principle of erosion, not melting.

  • @danielcunningham2394
    @danielcunningham2394 Рік тому +2

    I didn't know of this thank you for sharing this. It looks impressive.

  • @Trojan0304
    @Trojan0304 10 місяців тому

    Very detailed breakdown of weapon, one of the best on UA-cam. Thanks & subscribed

  • @johnm.3279
    @johnm.3279 Рік тому +9

    Each shell weighs around 14 lbs. which is well within the payload capacity of a commercial drone.

    • @Jay.Kellett
      @Jay.Kellett Рік тому

      Getting closer to a total "push Button" war.

  • @__ale__
    @__ale__ Рік тому +1

    Very interesting! Thank you for the video

  • @contingency9
    @contingency9 10 місяців тому

    That is frightenening! Very clever and the power unbelievable!

  • @heeder777
    @heeder777 Рік тому +10

    The US airdrop munition CBU-97 sensor fuzed weapon operates the same way. 10 submunitions with 4 sub sub munitions or Skeets on each of the 10 for a total of 40 skeets. The fire a copper slug into the top of an armored vehicle. Quite reliable and accurate.

    • @chopchop3464
      @chopchop3464 10 місяців тому

      cool

    • @bobthompson4319
      @bobthompson4319 10 місяців тому +1

      Ukraine needed cub 97s when the russians where all lined up on the hi way

    • @matsv201
      @matsv201 4 місяці тому

      The issue with that is that you need air superiority. And if you are Sweden and Sovjet is attacking , you might not have that.
      I would say also, that is probobly why the Swedish weapon work so well in Ukraine. They are designs for exactly that sort of war.

  • @alex-ragnarson3482
    @alex-ragnarson3482 Рік тому +16

    France is still a master in artillery 👍🇫🇷🇫🇷 Since Napoleon

    • @Chimaera72
      @Chimaera72 Рік тому +2

      Well, if I'm not mistaken, this is a BAE Systems Bofors developed munition, but I guess that if it is shot from a French artillery piece it is still impressive on the receiving end 🙂.

    • @alex-ragnarson3482
      @alex-ragnarson3482 Рік тому +4

      @@Chimaera72 Yep, it's a co developed France - Sweden but it's produced in France at Nexter.

    • @aitnaw5516
      @aitnaw5516 Рік тому +4

      No it was a joint venture between bofors and giat industries (french old MoD consortium) now nexter. It's 50-50 swedish and french but It's mainly used by France.

  • @frenstcht
    @frenstcht Рік тому

    Thanks. That was really interesting!

  • @bbgcars
    @bbgcars Рік тому +1

    I WAS LOOKING FOR THE BONUS ROUND IN THE VIDEO. :)

  • @petter5721
    @petter5721 Рік тому +7

    Awesome video!
    BONUS (BOfors NUtating Shell)👍🏻

    • @brianhaygood183
      @brianhaygood183 Рік тому +2

      Nutate: verb. Rock, sway, or nod.

    • @herpederpe4320
      @herpederpe4320 2 місяці тому

      Första gången jag ser dig skriva något annat än
      REPATRIERA EN MILJON
      Godspeed!!

  • @Jerry_from_analytics
    @Jerry_from_analytics Рік тому +41

    If I was show an animation of this round I'd probably say it's an "overcomplicated childish fantasy". Difficult to believe it's real ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

    • @TheArmourersBench
      @TheArmourersBench  Рік тому +17

      It's something isn't it. Wild concept in terms of the engineering.

    • @beardymcbeardface69
      @beardymcbeardface69 Рік тому +4

      As amazing as it is, this concept has existed in a working form at least for the past 30 years.
      Take a look at the US Air Force CBU-97 Sensor Fuzed Weapon. Same kill concept, with fin spiralling shaped charge munition which triggers on engine heat signature.

    • @HayotsRoman
      @HayotsRoman Рік тому +3

      The French used these shells in Iraq and Mali. It's not science fiction, it's technology ))

    • @Greg881994
      @Greg881994 Рік тому

      @@TheArmourersBenchHonestly, 100-140 mm of armored penetration really isn't that much. I mean, Kontakt-1 ERA, alone, even arranged in a manner that doesn't allow the block/brick to make the most of its abilities, provides 100-200 mm of protection, iirc, so this kind of weapon would actually be much more devastating against Western armor, & now Russia can reverse engineer it. Great...

    • @lykatheaaflame8254
      @lykatheaaflame8254 Рік тому +1

      @@Greg881994 It strikes the roof of the vehicles. What kind of tank has that thickness in the roof?

  • @emjizone
    @emjizone Рік тому

    Informative. Thanks.

    • @TheArmourersBench
      @TheArmourersBench  Рік тому

      Thanks Marc, I do enjoy making these looks at some of the more technical systems like the Russian top attack mines etc.

  • @TheEudaemonicPlague
    @TheEudaemonicPlague Рік тому +1

    Sounds like a game show--bonus round. That's pretty impressive for something that looks like a paint can. The winglets are pretty neat--I'd never seen anything quite like them before.

  • @prime-rib
    @prime-rib Рік тому +4

    The US produced the CBU 97 and CBU 105 going back to 1992. Each bomb had 10 submunitions which themselves contained 4 submunitions for a total of 40, individually targeted munitions. It was called the, "thousand miracles bomb" due to its complexity. I think the Ukrainians would find it useful.

  • @the7observer
    @the7observer Рік тому +6

    Spinning angry satellites that shit "lasers"

  • @Oi999Pa
    @Oi999Pa 4 місяці тому +2

    Amazing bit of kit

  • @bradmatz4150
    @bradmatz4150 4 місяці тому

    This video was very good & informative. I’m an old nerd who loves to learn. Nice job 😊

  • @chuckgriffith4539
    @chuckgriffith4539 Рік тому +4

    Thanks for the post! Interesting if that is scaled to 125 or 80 mm mortar rounds .

    • @meanmanturbo
      @meanmanturbo Рік тому +7

      There is Bofors STRIX. It works in a slightly different way, but is also a guided top attack round.

  • @janinsweden8559
    @janinsweden8559 10 місяців тому +8

    It was invented by BOFORS here in Sweden. BONUS stands for "BOfors NUtating Shell" Development of the BONUS began in 1985 as a study project of the Swedish Defence Materiel Administration (FMV). The intent was to find a way to increase the effectiveness of artillery in engaging enemy armoured units❤

    • @TheArmourersBench
      @TheArmourersBench  10 місяців тому +2

      Think I mention that. Thanks for watching

    • @mattiasdahlstrom2024
      @mattiasdahlstrom2024 Місяць тому

      Is there only 1 video of them in Ukraine? I thought quite a fair amount had been shipped there, so where is the combat use?

    • @janinsweden8559
      @janinsweden8559 Місяць тому

      @@mattiasdahlstrom2024 Ukraine is much better nowadays about not giving too much information away.

  • @DJSockmonkeyMusic
    @DJSockmonkeyMusic 24 дні тому

    What a great piece of kit to have on our side! I'm very impressed that they got it to work in such a small package.

  • @nicolaspeigne1429
    @nicolaspeigne1429 Місяць тому

    I can never get tired of those GIAT videos man, they look so goofy now but they do their job well

  • @Thaidory
    @Thaidory Рік тому +3

    It seems expensive only if you have never seen how many ordinary cheap rounds it takes to get a direct hit on a tank. It’s just the same money packed in less volume.

  • @Damian-Church-NZ
    @Damian-Church-NZ Рік тому +4

    That's an impressive weapon.

  • @hanfidampfi7149
    @hanfidampfi7149 Рік тому

    very good video thx^^

  • @domelxx8379
    @domelxx8379 Рік тому

    Amazing stuff

  • @joemorganeatmyshortschannel
    @joemorganeatmyshortschannel Рік тому +4

    Awesome as always

  • @Eyeless_Camper
    @Eyeless_Camper Рік тому +16

    If there is one thing Swedes know, its how to kill Russian tanks. XD

    • @kirgan1000
      @kirgan1000 Рік тому +3

      Yes Bofors have been working on it before World War II, with (for that time) excellent
      Bofors 37 mm anti-tank gun, and continued....

    • @bikesfrench8524
      @bikesfrench8524 Рік тому

      Fabrication française nexter

    • @Eyeless_Camper
      @Eyeless_Camper Рік тому +1

      @@bikesfrench8524 You do realise that BONUS stands for Bofors Nutating Shell, right? You making some dont make them yours.

    • @bikesfrench8524
      @bikesfrench8524 Рік тому

      @@Eyeless_Camper 40 mm Nexter

  • @conradnelson5283
    @conradnelson5283 Рік тому

    Those are so awesome!

  • @828enigma6
    @828enigma6 Рік тому

    VERY INTERESTING!

  • @jaroslavklima4591
    @jaroslavklima4591 Рік тому +8

    I just watched 4 times todays video of masacre near Vuhledar, were brave Ukrainians repeled Russian orcs attack. On one moment was to see arty explosion above 10m sideling over orc tank.... and this after few second started to burn from inside (ammo fire). At first moment i thought it was miss but now im almost sure it was something like BONUS shot.... Orcs lost over 30 IFV and Tanks in just one clash.... great succes !

  • @cristo6007
    @cristo6007 Рік тому +69

    Wondering how much the Russian tankers appreciate the "bonus".

    • @Zaizz100
      @Zaizz100 Рік тому +12

      Atleast it won´t cost them anything except their lives 😂

    • @asdsdjfasdjxajiosdqw8791
      @asdsdjfasdjxajiosdqw8791 Рік тому +17

      Russian tankists aren't even being taught how to operate their vehicle properly any more. I doubt the Russian MOD is is telling them about these horrors they're up against.

    • @benoitbvg2888
      @benoitbvg2888 Рік тому +3

      Cope cages are gonna come back in style for spring/summer 23.

    • @chucksneedmoreland
      @chucksneedmoreland Рік тому +2

      considering the almost regular destruction of pzh 2000 and m777 by loitering munitions, I don't they are too concerned about it

    • @Ivan-bk9xs
      @Ivan-bk9xs Рік тому +1

      this is the only bonus they're getting this year, lol!!

  • @adssadassssdsa3582
    @adssadassssdsa3582 Рік тому +2

    Military tech adds are the best, this Smart 155 logo animation i laugh at every time.

  • @sforza209
    @sforza209 Рік тому +20

    Wtf that is some crazy ass tech! Imagine how difficult it was to develop something like this!

    • @nikpapado9785
      @nikpapado9785 Рік тому +12

      Now lets also imagine that this is an "old" tech, imagine if that was developed in more recent years

    • @carlwheezerofsouls3273
      @carlwheezerofsouls3273 Рік тому +4

      yes, people were describing using these in training in 2003, imagine what kind of developments have been made in the past 20 years.

    • @herpederpe4320
      @herpederpe4320 2 місяці тому

      Its 40 year old technology

  • @chupacabra1765
    @chupacabra1765 4 місяці тому +1

    When your on the receiving end of something, It's always great to receive a Bonus.

  • @KF-qj2rn
    @KF-qj2rn Рік тому +4

    the US had a $1M missile in early 2000s or late '90s that had around 16 of these canisters, but I'm sure was very limited and not cost effective: could've been used upon the initial invasion line of vehicles

    • @stevidente
      @stevidente Рік тому +1

      Assault Breaker program’s Brilliant Anti Tank Munition for the ATACMs missile.

    • @peceed
      @peceed Рік тому

      ​ @Steven Evidente Hellfire costs $125k. Cost effectiveness is comparable.

    • @tarkitarker0815
      @tarkitarker0815 Рік тому

      the us however had not smart ammo, it seeked enemies, but enemies and thats it, and as we know every arab thats not rich is an enemy of the usa. they were normal, illegal cluster bombs.

  • @azinfidel6461
    @azinfidel6461 Рік тому +3

    Polyethylene is optically transparent to infrared, I don't think it would provide any kind of camouflage for a ground Target.

    • @TheArmourersBench
      @TheArmourersBench  Рік тому +3

      No, I think it's either bad machine translation (I don't think so) or it's just an in vain idea.

  • @shawn3701
    @shawn3701 Рік тому

    I am impressed!

  • @tomsmith476
    @tomsmith476 Рік тому +2

    I'm surprised how far the shape charge travel the round seem to explode like Fair distance above the target very interesting

  • @kirgan1000
    @kirgan1000 Рік тому +25

    Loots of old Swedish cold war stuff is being used.... what next STRIX? (the mortar shell of the same consept)

    • @ezragoldberg3132
      @ezragoldberg3132 Рік тому +22

      NLAW, Bonus, Excalibur, RBS-17, AT4. Lots of Bofors Systems in use in Ukraine right now

    • @5.56mm
      @5.56mm Рік тому +10

      Would be great to see STRIX in action.

    • @FXGreggan.
      @FXGreggan. Рік тому +5

      @@ezragoldberg3132 Maybe even JAS39 (of course not anytime soon) and RBS15 (also available with truck launchers) and later RBS15 versions can also attack land target and not just their fleet...

    • @jetaddicted
      @jetaddicted Рік тому +4

      Swedish AND French ☝️🥸

    • @FXGreggan.
      @FXGreggan. Рік тому +1

      @@jetaddicted True true, all I know is it started development here in Sweden but probably needed a joint partner to realize the project, for some reason Nexter doesn't seem to have a hand in STRIX which is the same technology... perhaps Bofors holds the patent or SAAB licenses it... still neat even though it's been around for >2 decades.

  • @MisterSiga
    @MisterSiga Рік тому +23

    the LUL is the real bonus here :D
    Mind boggling how something that small can be so effective and accurate.

    • @TheArmourersBench
      @TheArmourersBench  Рік тому

      Haha I would like to know what that stands for!

    • @eliadbu
      @eliadbu Рік тому

      @@TheArmourersBench BOfors NUtating Shell according to wikipedia.

    • @ericko1371
      @ericko1371 Рік тому

      @@TheArmourersBench In dutch it's dick🤣

    • @lsq7833
      @lsq7833 Рік тому +9

      @@TheArmourersBench LUL is a French manufacturer's marking attributed to LUCHAIRE DEFENSE, a subcontractor for Nexter.
      Funnily enough on some French shells you can find the identifier "ASS" which stands for the "Ateliers de Salbris" subcontractor.

    • @TheArmourersBench
      @TheArmourersBench  Рік тому +1

      I thought I'd seen LUL on something before, excellent thank you.

  • @augustinbelza2418
    @augustinbelza2418 Рік тому

    Great presentation 👍👍👍👍

  • @dropthehammer6484
    @dropthehammer6484 Рік тому +1

    Wow thank you ✌👍☝️🇨🇦

  • @superamper
    @superamper Рік тому +7

    Imagine being killed by something with LUL on it.

  • @MrOllevarm
    @MrOllevarm Рік тому +7

    From Karlskoga with love! :)

  • @600tian5
    @600tian5 Рік тому +1

    Never knew artillery could get this fancy wow!

    • @matsv201
      @matsv201 4 місяці тому

      That is loads of different fancy artillery munition. There is also one system to complement BONUS, The STRIX that is a 120mm light artilery (mortar) that can fire 7-9 km ad track and target enemy armor and IFV and. APC. It have much more advanced sensors and can differentiate between hit and active vihicles and also can tell the diffrance between different vehicles. Taking out heavy vehicles like tanks first, then IFV then APC.
      They was all designed in sweden in the late 80s for a war that never came. Bonus would thin out the Sovjet armor. STRIX would target what was left, and then go in With N-law and finish of what ever survived.

  •  Рік тому

    Nice Video and interestingf Weaponsystem. Would not have thought that they detonate this high. Also how do you defend against those? Maybe with a HEL ?

    • @rfarevalo
      @rfarevalo Рік тому +1

      You can't defend against it before it fires and you can't shoot down artillery rounds. This is why artillery rules and drones get shot down.

  • @86sather
    @86sather Рік тому +4

    i just live the name of the round… like the enemy is winning a prize :)

  • @alecdacyczyn
    @alecdacyczyn Рік тому +3

    So this is the artillery delivered version of the CBU-97 "Weapon of 13 Consecutive Miracles".

  • @cotcotpouetpouet
    @cotcotpouetpouet Рік тому +1

    with the fast "ceasar" howitzer, 3 minutes to stop-deploy-fire 6 shots-leave. 62mph on road, 31mph off-road.

  • @nicksantos43
    @nicksantos43 4 місяці тому +1

    I don't think people fully sppreciate just how amazing these submunitions are in that they can identify enemy armor and fire their shaped charge at just the right moment, while spinning, to hit the target.

  • @user-dl2iy5yv2k
    @user-dl2iy5yv2k Рік тому +3

    I do have a pesky squirrel in my yard…….

    • @user-iw1qn3mt7e
      @user-iw1qn3mt7e Рік тому

      squirrels appeared on this planet before people, so we are their guests. Have respect

  • @Vatnikenrager
    @Vatnikenrager Рік тому +8

    I like the fact that the BAE animation even shows it targeting what looks like a t72 lol.

    • @sergeig685
      @sergeig685 Рік тому

      You don't know your tanks, that looks nothing like the 72. The turret overhang, the number of road wheels, the extractor, etc, it is obviously an Abrams.

    • @Vatnikenrager
      @Vatnikenrager Рік тому

      @@sergeig685 I have forgotten more than you will ever know lol, you don't know how to read..I said in the animation, not in the diagram.

  • @peterbaker8443
    @peterbaker8443 Рік тому

    We used to be developing an area denial system that used these munitions in a box type configuration that could be totally autonomous or monitored for enemy movement

  • @christophermorris7616
    @christophermorris7616 Рік тому

    Descending from above a LiDar Shape Charge 🍃 deadly design for sure

  • @uncuttcoffeeofficial
    @uncuttcoffeeofficial Рік тому +6

    I could have swore I saw a video on telegram where a helicopter was taken out by some type of munition that shot downwards just like this one. I'd be willing to bet money it was some type of munition like this. Extremely interesting video. 💪🇺🇦

    • @certaindeath7776
      @certaindeath7776 Рік тому +3

      when heli is low enough, thats certainly possible. but i guess it was not aimes at the heli, but the heli was in the wrong moment at the wrong places and took a round ment for a tank ^^

    • @uncuttcoffeeofficial
      @uncuttcoffeeofficial Рік тому

      @@certaindeath7776 hell of a video ! Definitely the first I've ever seen of such. And I dig through these videos all day long. Crazy hit

    • @Noubers
      @Noubers Рік тому +4

      That video was most likely an S300. Clearer angle showed the projectile being almost as tall as the helicopter. S300 has a diving terminal mode for some of its missile types.
      It's also easy to mistake a high speed air burst for an EFP as explosions, while fast, are not instantaneous and do carry some of the momentum and velocity vector that the warhead was traveling in.

    • @uncuttcoffeeofficial
      @uncuttcoffeeofficial Рік тому +1

      @@Noubers okay okay thanks for info 👍

  • @inwedavid6919
    @inwedavid6919 Рік тому +3

    Clearly the ammo looks like to have been send with Caesar and the older TRF1 too.

  • @sjvche7675
    @sjvche7675 Рік тому

    TAMS, target activated monitions, Aerojet in So. Cal. was playing with that 30 years ago.

  • @Martyz-TV
    @Martyz-TV Рік тому

    Now THAT is frightening!,

  • @bigmike3964
    @bigmike3964 Рік тому +3

    Perfect time to do some real battlefield research, to fine tune this round.

  • @a13Banger
    @a13Banger Рік тому +3

    I would put my money on incorrect fuze setting or malfunction in EPIAFS before I suspected that russians had found a way to mitigate their effects.

    • @bear76009
      @bear76009 Рік тому

      yea exactly , just like the claims the Iranians shot down one of our stealth drones. They show pictures that dont show any damage other than it broken into a few pieces. Then they claim they "hacked" it. Like its on the internet ... pfft.. Then they claim they "overrode the controls and landed it" so all these things run on crypto that cant even be broken by the NSA in real time as its a daily changed randomized encryption. By the time they broke the code its already been changed to a new one not that they could break the first one but anyway. I used to do this SIGINT/ELINT stuff and i know what we can do. What a backwards nation like Iran or Russia? Please.

  • @terrystephens1102
    @terrystephens1102 Рік тому

    Wow, what a fantastic weapon 👌👌👌👌

  • @chrissample3047
    @chrissample3047 Рік тому

    Awesome

  • @gabrielteo3636
    @gabrielteo3636 Рік тому +13

    Russia: We are not fighting Ukraine. We are fighting NATO.
    NATO: Then come attack us.
    Russia: ...

    • @moos7005
      @moos7005 Рік тому

      Then why does NATO not just role into Moscow and remove Putin?
      Surely something is holding them back?

    • @gabrielteo3636
      @gabrielteo3636 Рік тому +8

      @@moos7005 "Then why does NATO not just role into Moscow and remove Putin?
      Surely something is holding them back?"
      It is called nukes.
      NATO does not want Russian land. The same cannot be said for Russia and Ukrainian land.

    • @nikpapado9785
      @nikpapado9785 Рік тому

      @@gabrielteo3636 Exactly, the rosso-brainwashed people fail to understrand that NATO is a defensive alliance. NATO cannot invade. It exists as a shield, not a spear.

    • @tenpoll
      @tenpoll Рік тому +1

      @@gabrielteo3636 also, not wanting to accidentally world war 3.

    • @gabrielteo3636
      @gabrielteo3636 Рік тому

      @@tenpoll Unfortunately, the Russians have never given up till they have had 500K losses. This war will go on for another 3-5 years, the Russian economy will be wrecked and they will become another N. Korea. The only thing stopping that is a bullet for Putin.

  • @marcelOberauer
    @marcelOberauer Рік тому +6

    What you show at 7:15 was a SMart 155 submunition parachute, not a Bonus. For the quality of the video, its to big to be a Bonus submunition.

    • @othertipo
      @othertipo Рік тому +3

      Yes, the submunition has the size of a hatchet compared to the armor vehicle, or the size of a parachute. A Bonus round would be barely noticeable.

    • @JnSobre
      @JnSobre Рік тому +1

      It is parachute, or a very big winglet submunition 😁

  • @richardkudrna7503
    @richardkudrna7503 Рік тому

    It looks like the self destruct feature needs work. I wonder if it depends on one battery ? I do hope the self destruct can be redesigned to be extremely reliable. Maybe it needs a mechanical backup ?

  • @alu6363
    @alu6363 Рік тому

    Wonderful... Send many of them...

  • @joshuaworman4022
    @joshuaworman4022 Рік тому +7

    this is very good news they have a new way to atrit russian armored vehicles. ive been wondering since the beginning of the war what will happen when russia runs out of t72s... do they just go home at that point?

    • @dukenukem8381
      @dukenukem8381 Рік тому +1

      they have 10 000 hulls that can be repaired. Acsees to iran nk algeria. Basically endless tanks.

    • @tech477
      @tech477 Рік тому

      @@dukenukem8381 we'll have fun popping them.

    • @poromafia
      @poromafia Рік тому +8

      @@dukenukem8381 But hulls of what?
      You don't just slap a new motor and a coat of paint on the carcass of a T-80 that has been sitting in a debot since the USSR collapsed.
      We have seen a ever increasing amount of T-62's operated by Russia which makes you question the condition of T-72 and T-80 tanks.
      Even Russian state went: "We will reactivate our million T-80's!", but then they started talking about activating more T-62's.

    • @dukenukem8381
      @dukenukem8381 Рік тому

      @@poromafia around 5000 t-72 type hulls, they have full production cycle

    • @dukenukem8381
      @dukenukem8381 Рік тому

      @@tech477 godspeed

  • @zcrib3
    @zcrib3 Рік тому +6

    I remember seeing a promo video of the Russian version of this thing years ago. It was similar to the second variant you described with the parachute.

    • @leneanderthalien
      @leneanderthalien Рік тому +3

      Russian version doest exits

    • @lacojanco7571
      @lacojanco7571 Рік тому

      @@leneanderthalien what is doest? Is it russian version of - it exist on paper and on invoices, but doesnt exist in real life?

    • @rfarevalo
      @rfarevalo Рік тому +1

      There is no Russian equivalent.

    • @sergeig685
      @sergeig685 Рік тому

      @@rfarevalo There is whole family of Russian MLRS delivered top attack anti armor munitions. They have seen action in Ukraine, very effective. Russians do not have very many of them though. There is even a mine that air launches smart munitions, like PTKM-1R, very effective.

  • @disme2072
    @disme2072 Рік тому

    amazing.

  • @user-vl4vh4jq5r
    @user-vl4vh4jq5r 4 місяці тому

    4:44 -> my backdoor after a spicy burrito!

  • @ME262MKI
    @ME262MKI Рік тому +4

    I remember seeing weeks ago something similar from the orcs, their "innovative idea" was a dumb.... device of the size of a beer barrel at the side of the road and triggered by remote control or trap wire but only could hit one target and the device couldn't be hidden and no Foe or friendly detector, literally a thing from 30 years ago

    • @TheArmourersBench
      @TheArmourersBench  Рік тому +1

      You mean this one? ua-cam.com/video/8YMfaiNai84/v-deo.html

    • @sergeig685
      @sergeig685 Рік тому

      The only dumb thing here is your comment. That roadside mine you described has been adopted decades ago by soviets, US, and other NATO countries. And it still does exactly what it was designed to do - ambush armored vehicles. Russians themselves have their own versions of top attack EPF smart rounds. Anything from MLRS delivered munition to a mine that launches the munition into the air like the PTKM-1R, very effective

  • @Revener666
    @Revener666 Рік тому +3

    It is also available in a mortar version.

    • @pingvinencharleswood971
      @pingvinencharleswood971 Рік тому +2

      No, it is not.

    • @Revener666
      @Revener666 Рік тому +1

      @@pingvinencharleswood971 yes it is

    • @pingvinencharleswood971
      @pingvinencharleswood971 Рік тому +2

      @@Revener666 No, Bonus uses the rotationen of the shell (spin stabilized) and the sub unit to detect the target. A mortar have no rifling. Therefore it is impossible to build a "mortar version" of the BONUS system. What do you call the mortar version, mini-Bonus or? It's not existing, sorry!

    • @Revener666
      @Revener666 Рік тому +1

      @@pingvinencharleswood971 Sigh!
      Bofors made an attack tanks from the top shell for mortars called Strix.

    • @pingvinencharleswood971
      @pingvinencharleswood971 Рік тому +2

      @@Revener666 Correct that Bofors made the Strix for mortar, but this is a totally different product and hasn't any similarity at all with BONUS. To call it another "verision" is incorrect.

  • @Nitestalker65
    @Nitestalker65 Рік тому

    All I have to say is Wow!!!!

  • @devondetroit2529
    @devondetroit2529 Рік тому +2

    Incredible engineering

  • @cheesenoodles8316
    @cheesenoodles8316 Рік тому +6

    I remember when this technology was on the drawing board....looks even more devastating in deployment. Now, the countermeasures.....

    • @russell7489
      @russell7489 Рік тому +12

      Counter Measure - Don't attack Western Nations

  • @ttp_007
    @ttp_007 Рік тому +3

    Designers failed to develop a detonation chamber into the electronic brains of the Bonus 155mm to prevent enemies from finding and studying it.

    • @sergeig685
      @sergeig685 Рік тому

      You don't need to. Russians and other countries have their own versions of it for quiet a while.

  • @dfpguitar
    @dfpguitar 4 місяці тому

    I am astonished that this could ever work. To even fet the two tumbling blobs accurately above the target seems hard enough but for then those two blobs to somehow pinpoint fix on the target and launch their own projectiles at the target, while they themselves are falling and revolving it is unbelievable.

  • @VickersDoorter
    @VickersDoorter Рік тому +2

    I could do with with these to create a parking space when shopping at Waitrose.

  • @niklaskristensson2231
    @niklaskristensson2231 Рік тому +3

    Bonus is a Swedish product from the beginning.

    • @jorgetrincheira2120
      @jorgetrincheira2120 Рік тому +6

      nope a Swedish AND french produsct . A cooperation of Nexter ( france) and Bofors ( Sweden).
      Nexter is well knwon for producing the CAESAR 155m howitzer .

    • @ganikus8565
      @ganikus8565 Рік тому +1

      100 % French for its invention and creation on paper , then built by French and Swedish companies