غامدیصاحب اللہ تعالٰی آپ کو دنیا اور آخرت کی خوشیاں عطاء فرمائے 🤲🤲 جس طرح اپ نے دین اور دنیا کا علم ہم تک پہنچائیا ہے... وه اپنی مثال اپ ہے. هم اپ کے شکر گزار ہیں... کہ اپ نے دین کو اور قران و سنت کو اس کی صحیح اور اسان شکل میں هم تک پهنچانے کی کوشش کی... الله پاک اپ کی کوششوں کو قبول فرمائے...اور همیں سیدھے راستے پر چلنے اور رھنے کی توفیق دے. امین
Mohammed Jamil Allah guide his true seekers to the right path quran is book of Allah Sunnah is way the of Allahs Prophet and Haddith is the guidance from our beloved prophet Muhammad peace and blessings be upon him
@@SADAF786pk Definitely, Ghamdi is misguiding Muslims. Ghamdi is very cunning, shrewd. Sweet talks, jargon, unnecessary long sentences to confuse Muslims. Ghamdi is munkare Hadiths. Ghamdi also says - SUNNAT is present in the Quran ( so that Ghamdi says - no need Hadiths). Just listen here - Namaj prayed by previous Prophets, HAJJ done by previous Prophets - all are in the Quran. So what Ghamdi - -! but how should we pray now, HAJJ, Zakat now? Definitely, We Muslims need Hadiths, in addition to the Quran, to guide us. Ghamdi is definitely munkare Hadiths, gomrah.
@@salmahmud7668 mashaallah bro Is hadith books are wrote by Prophet Muhammad? Muhammad s.a.w message was Quran not hadith books after 200 years. When Quran says to allow Muhammad s.a.w it is talking to people of that time. When Quran is being reveal they are the first addressee. At that time hadith books don't exist. Nor prophet sa.w said you need to write a book other Quran. At last we respect hadith as a great human effort. It gives us insights into prophets life
Alhumdulilah , quran is complete book and prove itself no need for other resources to prove it. We just need to implement it in our society to get heaven here and hereafter inshallah.
dilloo rehman You can watch the same video with English subtitles here: “Original Sources of Islam: Sunnah vs Hadith (Javed Ahmad Ghamidi) [English subtitles]” m.ua-cam.com/video/qkuV7acIwUg/v-deo.html
Allah ne nabi ko Quran dia or nabi ne wo ummat ko Jab k Hadith insan ne insan ko di Agy ap logon ko khud apne liye faisla krna chaiye k Allah or nabi pr aitbar haq hai jab k insan ki koi zamanat ni
Farzan Arvi Namaz padhne ka tareeka Quran me hai. Aur Namaz Quran se pehle thi to isliye kuch cheezein hadith se li ja sakti hai lekin Quran se filter karna padta hai ussey. For example Quran say ki Khuda ke alawa kisi aur ka naam na lein namaz aur azaan mein.
@@farzanarvi5953 Namaz to Adam A S ke zamane se hai. Namaz hame Nabi ne sikhaee, pahle sahabi fir unse hote huwe ham tak hai. kisi hadees me namaaz ka poora tarika hai hi nahi. log kahte hai ki hadees me hai. to unse poochhiye ki sahabi log bina Hadees ke namaz kaise padhte the?
The question concerns Hadith narrated by Bukhari and others. Most of the Hadith are oral transmissions from person to person and finally recorded as Hadiths. With the passage of time, changes can happen with oral transmission (human memory and personal preference), and therefore, if the Hadith does not conform to the Quran, it must be rejected. Most Hadith must be rejected on this basis.
boncela jan We kindly differ on this position . We do not have to reject Hadith simply because it seems to contradict the Qur'an. We will try to find the context of that Hadith and try to use our scholarship to find a reason and contetext for any such Hadith. Yes if we cannot find any reason or context of any Hadith that is contradiction with Hadith we shall surely raise our concerns over its authenticity. You can check out our approch in analysing Hadith here : Understanding Hadith | Javed Ahmad Ghamidi: ua-cam.com/play/PLucOobAkGHmS9u4q5_ZqszjO-uHM9BO10.html
The way ahadis were searched and gathered and relevant scrutiny and above all time factor and time span creates doubts. For instance the period which was of intimidation of Imams and ahlul byts and rule of Banu Ummayyid and Banu Abbasids who were hell bent insulting and killings of Ahlul byts did not allow any thing which glorified family of prophet sawaw. Instead concentrated out of way to glorify Muavia, Abubakr (r), Umar(r), Usman(r) and so on. Those who collected such ahadis were afraid of those rulers and accordingly skipped very important events. This four Maslaks also part of such process. I'm sunni hanafi, but have nagging doubts weather my belief can fetch me jannat or may end up as a Shia aane Yazid bin Muavia bin Abu Sufiyan Marwood!!!!!!!
@AlMawridHind A superfluous statement in defiance of the Quran's own commands. The Quran on multiple occasions asserts itself as the only source of divine law necessary or valid for Islamic life. It questions directly which hadith will they believe in after this. Blatant contradictions with the Quran are inherently wrong and to be discarded
پھر بغیم بینہم کیا ہے؟ ولا تفرقوا کیا ہے؟ دراصل اختلافات ایک سنگین آزمائش ہیں کہ صحیح مومن کون ہے. اور قرآن کریم کی آیات ہیں کہ ہم ان اہل علم کے اختلافات میں بھی سچے مومن و مومنہ کو صحیح راستہ بتاتے ہیں...زمانہ کتنا ہی پر فتن اور پرآشوب ہو، ہدایت کا ذمہ اللہ کا ہے بشرطیکہ ہم حقیقی مومن ہوں.. بے شمار احادیث ایک ہی واقعہ اور سنت کو اختلافی طور پر بیان کرتی ہیں ایسے میں اللہ ہی صراط مستقیم کی ہدایت دیتا ہے اور ضرور دیگا.... رب زدنی علما
You are wrong dear...There are many things in Qur'an which can't be understood and practiced without Sahi Hadith. Example:Offer Salah but "How" says Hadith
@@truthseeker586 Allah is telling us that even Mushrikeen of Makkah used to pray Salaat: Quran 8:35 - Their prayer (salaat) at the House is nothing but whistling and clapping. So taste the punishment because you were disbelievers! Salaat is a very old practice and has been practiced by all previous nations this is why if you look at rituals of all major world religions especially christanity and judaism, one sees standing, bowing and prostration. When Quran says offer salaat, the arabs already knew what salaat was and how to pray it as 8:35 tells us.
Ek baat samajh nhi aayi ki agar namaz pehle se hi paanch waqt thi to rasulullah (saw) ne shabe meraj me moosa alaihissalam se milkar 50 namazo ko 5 kiya is riwayat ka kya
"Yeh (Sunnat) kisi riwaayat per mabni nahi" - Ghamidi Uske baawajood, aap apni issi baat ki daleel Ahadeeth aur Sira literature ki riwaayat se de rahe hain.
Yeh Sunnat ka ijma documented hai kahin? Iss baat ki kya guarantee hai ke aaj jo Namaz aap parhte hain, yehi namaz RasoolALLAH ne parhaayi thi? Islam ka revival shuru ek sheher (Makkah) se hua tha. Aur phir taweel arsay mei futuhaat ke zariye dusray areas mei pohancha. Toh kya yeh mumkin nahi ke mukhtalif areas mei 1400 saal baad koi Sunnat amal modify hogaya ho, chaahay bad-niyyati se ya galti se? Yeh jo aaj itne mazay se aap Ahadeeth ki (Sunnat mei) ehmiyat ko radd karte hain, iska aapko andaaza tab hota jab Ahadeeth mojood he na hotin. 1400 saal baad paida hone wala musalmaan hamesha iss shak mei rehta ke Sunnat 1400 saalon mei badal gayi hogi. Lekin Ahadeeth ke hone se yeh shak sirf 200 saalon ka hogaya hai. Ahadeeth koi alag se ilm ya kitaaben nahi, balke 200 saal baad hone wali Sunnat ki documentation hain. Jo log yeh sawaal poochte hain ke "Ahadeeth ki kitaaben aanay se pehle ke Musalmaan kese Deen pe chalte thay?" Unke liye jawaab yeh hai ke Ahadeeth ko kitaabon ki soorat mei compile sirf 200 saal baad kya gaya tha. Lekin Nabi ka ilm aur taalimaat toh mojood he thin usse pehle ke Musalmaanon mei. Kyunke unhone direct Nabi se seekha tha, aur woh Nabi ke waqt se nazdeeq thay; issi waja se unke liye Ahadeeth ka kitaabi soorat mei hona zaroori nahi tha. Hamare liye zaroori hai.
Ap ki itlah k liya arz ha k sunnat fiqa ki kitabo ma documented ha jo hadith sa pahla ki ha.imam malik imam hanifa tabai tha jinho na sahaba sa sekh kr drj kya. Sunnat ko jama krna fiqa ka kaam tha. Hadith pr to aaj b doubt uthta ha to kya logo na namaz parhna chor d ha kya subcontinent ma hadith ki kitaabo sa nimaz sikhai gai. Hadith sirf documented history ha rasool Allah saw k zamane ki. Agr ya shariyat hoti to khulga rashdeen in ko b record krwate.
@@DanishAli-rm2ky Acha? Zara naam bata na Imam Malik aur Imam Abu Hanifa ki Sunnat/Fiqh ki kitaabon ke. Aur unke book cover ki ek tasweer bhi bhejna please. Doosri baat, Muhammad (pbuh) ki wafaat 630 mei hui thi. Abu Hanifa aur Maalik ki birth 699 aur 711 mei hui thi. Jo Sahabi 5-6 saal ke hon Nabi ki wafaat ke waqt, woh inn dono ki birth ke waqt 75, 85 saal ke honge. Toh phir kitne aisay Sahaba thay jinse inn dono ne direct seekha tha? Aur unke zara naam bhi bata dena please. Teesri baat, Fiqh ka Sunnat se bohat bohat bohat chhota sa overlap hai. Fiqh ziadatar unbacked/unsupported jurisprudence hai "uss waqt ke" masaail se tackle karnay ke liye. Usme Quran, Sunnat, Hadith, Ijma, Qiyas, Ijtihad ke combination se fatway hotay hain. Chotthi baat, Imam Maalik ne bhi Hadith ki kitaab compile ki thi jisko Al-Muwatta kaha jata hai. Woh probably pehli Hadith ki kitaab hai. Paanchvi baat, agar Sunnat document hui thi aur Sahaba se seekhi thi, toh phir Imam Abu Hanifa aur Imam Maalik ka aksar baaton mei ikhtilaaf kyun hai? Chhati baat, Sahaba ne toh Sunnat ko bhi document nahi karaya tha. Toh aapka yeh wala point Hadith ke khilaaf meaningless hai. Sahaba ko ilm tha Hadith aur Sunnat ka, unko zaroorat mehsoos nahi hui inhe document karnay ki. Behtar yehi hota ke woh future generations ke liye kar dete. Khair, Ma Sha ALLAH. Aakhri baat, Ghamidi ka nazariya Sunnat ko leke woh nahi hai jo aap bata rahay hain. Unke hisaab se Sunnat amali tawaatur (action based version of Chinese whisper) se ayi hai. Bilkul wese he jese Hadith qauli tawaatur (Chinese whisper) se ayi hai. Farq bas yeh hai ke Hadith 100-200 saal baad document hogayi thi achi khaasi scrutiny aur effort ke saath lekin inke fehem wali Sunnat aaj tak nahi hui hai 1400 saal se.
These are God's revelations (Quran) that We recite to you with truth, so in which hadith other than God and His revelations (Quran) do they believe? 45:6 Which hadith after it (Quran) do they believe in? 7:185
تو وہ مولوی جو کہتے ہیں کہ نماز کا تحفہ ہمیں معراج سے ملاُ۔ آپ سے پہلے پچاس نمازیں تھیں ۔ اور کچھ کہتے ہیں کہ اور نبی نماز نہیں پڑھتے تھے ان کا الگ انداز تھا عبادت کا ۔۔ لیکن آپ نے کُچھ اور کہہ دیا
Yeh jo aap n bataya k namaz aur se bahar Deen nhi h yeh glt baat h Namaz Deen k hissa h Deen nhi . Aur 2 cheez Sabse zada zaroori h Deen Quran aur ahlebait aur aapne ahlebait k bare zikr hi nhi kia
Javed Ghamdi is trying to equate the authenticity of the Qur'an with so called "sunnah". Whilst he Qur'an authenticates itself and puts the responsibility of its preservation in God's hands, it makes no such reference to "sunnah of Prophet Muhammad”. Indeed the only responsibility of the Prophet was to recite the Qur’an only, clearly and verbatim. There is no instruction to the Prophet to teach or transmit his “sunnah” and expect people to “copy” certain rituals. Large numbers of people doing some rituals is not proof of authenticity otherwise we should accord the same respect to rituals found in all the religions. To compare sunnah transmission with the existence of Mogul rule is a false analogy; the Moghuls did not leave certain rituals for their descendants to copy - that’s not how the governance works! The issue is not whether an Islamic empire was established but whether Prophet Muhammad taught five ritual acts as the basis of deen or religion. Despite Ghamdi's claims there is little evidence to show that Prophet Muhammad’s mission was to rediscover and transmit Prophet Abraham’s rituals eg slaughtering animals all over the world - how does that even improve the lives of individuals or wider human society? It seems to be a deviation from the Qur’an which declares itself as the only guidance and complete guidance sent by God and was the only book recited by Prophet Muhammad.
غامدی صاحب آپ نے اتنی باتیں موضوع سے ہٹ کر کہی ہیں اور قرآن سے انکا کوئ ثبوت نہیں دیا۔ نبیوں کی سنت قرآن میں کہاں بتائ گئ ہے؟ سنت کے معنی ہین آپ نے نہیں بتاۓ۔ ہم جسے سنت کہتے ہیں وہ محمد عس کے تواتر کے ساتھ کیۓ ہوۓ اعمال ہیں جنکا قرآن میں کوئ ذکر نہیں ہے۔ سنت محمد عس یا سنت رسول کے الفاظ قرآن میں بھی نہیں ہیں۔یہ سنتیں بھی محدثین نے سن کر بغیر کسی ثبوت کے اور گواہوں کے اپنے غلط معیار کہ یہ راویان سچے سمجھے جاتے تھے۔ یہ معیار سچائ کا قرآن کے خلاف ہے۔ سچائ قرآن سے یا گواہوں سے معلوم ہوتی ہے۔ اور گواہ نہ ہوں تو حدیث کہنے والا اللہ کو حاضر و ناظر مان کر کہتا ہے کہ اگر یہ حدیث یا سنت جھوٹی ہو تو اللہ،کی مجھ پر لعنت ہو۔ قرآن کے سچائ کے پیمانے استعمال ہی نہیں کیۓ گۓ تھے۔ یہاں تک کہ محدثین بھی قرآن سے شاید ناواقف تھے اس لیۓ نہ تو انہوں نے راویوں سے پوچھا کہ یہ بات یا عمل محمد عس قرآن کی کس آیت کے مطابق ہے۔ آپ کوئ سنت کی مثال دیتے تو میں جواب دیتا۔ میرا آپکو کھلا چیلینج ہے کہ سنت یا حدیث کی کوئ مثال دے کر مکمل اسناد کے ساتھ لکھیں اور اسے قرآن کے مطابق ثابت کریں۔ مثلا” معراج کی سب حدیثیں قرآن کے خلاف اور جھوٹی ہیں۔آپ نے جو روزوں کے بارے میں کہا ہے کہ دوسری قومیں بھی روزے رکھتی تھی، تو ثابت کریں کہ یہ کسکی سنت یا حدیث ہوئ؟ آپ قرآن کی پیروی اور اسی کی تبلیغ کرتے رہنے کے احکامات سے کیا کفر کرتے ہیں؟ جب اللہ نے سنت اور حدیث محمد عس کو ماننے کا کہا ہی نہیں تو آپ غیر از قرآن بات یا عمل مان کر کیا کفر قرآن اور شرک نہیں کر رہے ہیں؟جواب کا طلبگار ہوں۔
20% Islam comes from Quran, 60% from Hadith, 20% from Sira. Muslim who reject Hadith and believe in Quran only becomes apostate by default. Muhammad's words and deeds are Sunnah. All 3 Islamic books Quran Hadith Sira were written after Muhammad's death under Caliph's supervision.
All these comes from 0% of your knowledge 😂 I'm sorry sister!, im just kidding, don't take it literally We shouldn't divide it into percentage, Quran is complete in its own way. ALLAH knows best
Seedhi simple si bat yahoodiyo Ka maksad hi yahi hai new nasal musalmano ke Dil se masjid aqsa ka khayal hi nikal Jaye .. Aur ye niklega kaise jab hadis ko chhod denge tab new nasal musalman bhool jayegi koi tawajjo na denge yahoodiyo ne hadis e munkar ko paida hi is liye Kiya taki new nasal musalmano ke Dil se aqsa Ka khayal hi nikal Jaye taki jab wo masjid ko giraye tab koi khada na ho unke samne
You are wrong, and it is ironic what you said! Actually Muslim religious scholarship was heavily influenced by Jewish scholarshp. Within Judaism there is the Torah (the word of God) and then there is the Talmud, collection of rabbinical teachings. The Talmud allowed Jewish scholars to make a religion of their own. This is exactly what Muslim scholars did with Hadith collections, make a religion with laws and rules of their own.The Quran could not be changed as its sanctity is guaranteed by Allah, even though attempts were made with such ideas as "abrogation" of Quranic verses and "hadith qudsi." There is no basis in Quran for these concepts, they are the creation of scholars! The Quran itself declares that it is the only authentic book of Islam! By following hadiths we are following a religion made by the scholars, by following the Quran only we are following Allah's commands!
These are God's revelations (Quran) that We recite to you with truth, so in which hadith other than God and His revelations (Quran) do they believe? 45:6 Which hadith after it (Quran) do they believe in? 7:185
"Guidance" and "Ahadith" should never be in the same sentence. Because the only Book of Guidance is Qur'an. "This [Qur'an] is guidance." _(Surah Al-Jaathiya 45: Verse 11)_ "This [Qur'an] is a clear statement to [all] the people and a guidance and instruction for those conscious of Allah." _(Surah. Aal-i-Imraan 3: Verse 138)_ "This is the Book about which there is no doubt, a guidance for those conscious of Allah -" _(Surah Al-Baqara 2: Verse 2)_ "Then in what statement after the Qur'an will they believe?" _(Surah Al-Mursalaat 77: Verse 50)_
Qayamat mein kis cheez se tumhara hisaab hoga? to ye kahega Quran se. Isko pucho sare nabi kis kitab per gawahi denge? aur wo apne gawah bhi pesh karenge kis kitab per? har nabi ki ek ek kitab layi jayegi? to ye kahega ke nahi Ek hi kitab layi jayegi. Jo ke Umul kitab hai. Quran padho surah Zumar ayat 69 Insha Allah iska jawab mil jayega. Ye video wala jhoot bolta hai. Hamara hisaab sirf Quran se hoga aur kisi kitab se nahi. Allah ke liye samajh jao.
Islam kya hai? Millat E Ibraheem ! And Allah , Prophet Muhammad ko kya kehta hai Quran me? Ibraheem ka deen follow karne ke liye! To uss tarah agar Muhammad, Ibraheem ke follower hain to 5 waqt bhi Ibraheem se hai.
غامدیصاحب اللہ تعالٰی آپ کو دنیا اور آخرت کی خوشیاں عطاء فرمائے 🤲🤲
جس طرح اپ نے دین اور دنیا کا علم ہم تک پہنچائیا ہے... وه اپنی مثال اپ ہے.
هم اپ کے شکر گزار ہیں... کہ اپ نے دین کو اور قران و سنت کو اس کی صحیح اور اسان شکل میں هم تک پهنچانے کی کوشش کی... الله پاک اپ کی کوششوں کو قبول فرمائے...اور همیں سیدھے راستے پر چلنے اور رھنے کی توفیق دے. امین
brilliant answer from real scholar
Mohammed Jamil Allah guide his true seekers to the right path quran is book of Allah Sunnah is way the of Allahs Prophet and Haddith is the guidance from our beloved prophet Muhammad peace and blessings be upon him
Sadaf Shahab Hadees isn't written by Muhammad pbh nor he advised anyone to write it.
Sky High He clearly said that hadith isn't part of deen it's just history of Prophet Muhammad and it can be filtered too.
Sadaf Sadiq .we dont need hadees quran is pure true book thats enough for us hadees is only story and kahaniya which is confusing muslim
@@SADAF786pk
Definitely, Ghamdi is misguiding Muslims.
Ghamdi is very cunning, shrewd.
Sweet talks, jargon, unnecessary long sentences to confuse Muslims.
Ghamdi is munkare Hadiths.
Ghamdi also says - SUNNAT is present in the Quran ( so that Ghamdi says - no need Hadiths).
Just listen here - Namaj prayed by previous Prophets, HAJJ done by previous Prophets - all are in the Quran.
So what Ghamdi - -! but how should
we pray now, HAJJ, Zakat now?
Definitely, We Muslims need Hadiths, in addition to the Quran, to guide us.
Ghamdi is definitely munkare Hadiths, gomrah.
MashA Allah..nicely put for munkare Hadith
there is no doubt in this book, Quran. Guidance to mankind. that's it. Period.
But unfortunately, you probably did not read the Quran. Because, it repeatedly asks to follow and obey Prophet Mohammed SAW.
@@salmahmud7668 mashaallah bro Is hadith books are wrote by Prophet Muhammad? Muhammad s.a.w message was Quran not hadith books after 200 years. When Quran says to allow Muhammad s.a.w it is talking to people of that time. When Quran is being reveal they are the first addressee. At that time hadith books don't exist. Nor prophet sa.w said you need to write a book other Quran.
At last we respect hadith as a great human effort. It gives us insights into prophets life
Alhumdulilah , quran is complete book and prove itself no need for other resources to prove it.
We just need to implement it in our society to get heaven here and hereafter inshallah.
Read the Quran first
Dear Al-Mawrid Hind,
I have contributed English subtitles for this video. Please approve it, so that it becomes available for all to view.
Shees Hassan Shaikh would be good If we could have the english translation
dilloo rehman You can watch the same video with English subtitles here:
“Original Sources of Islam: Sunnah vs Hadith (Javed Ahmad Ghamidi) [English subtitles]”
m.ua-cam.com/video/qkuV7acIwUg/v-deo.html
Thank you very much for the translation BarrakAllahfii
I Shia town senthal District Bareilly up I 100% agree with you please
Your discourses are a source of life and sheer guidance. Love for teacher Javed Ahmed Ghamidi!
QUR'AAN was compiled in the
Life of Hazrat Muhammad (saw) and was in the form of a KITAAB/BOOK/Dafa'tain.
جزاک اللہ
MOLVIO KO AB VOCATION PER JANA HO GA INSHALLAH 😇
Allah ne nabi ko Quran dia or nabi ne wo ummat ko Jab k
Hadith insan ne insan ko di
Agy ap logon ko khud apne liye faisla krna chaiye k Allah or nabi pr aitbar haq hai jab k insan ki koi zamanat ni
Farzan Arvi Namaz padhne ka tareeka Quran me hai. Aur Namaz Quran se pehle thi to isliye kuch cheezein hadith se li ja sakti hai lekin Quran se filter karna padta hai ussey. For example Quran say ki Khuda ke alawa kisi aur ka naam na lein namaz aur azaan mein.
@@farzanarvi5953 Namaz to Adam A S ke zamane se hai. Namaz hame Nabi ne sikhaee, pahle sahabi fir unse hote huwe ham tak hai. kisi hadees me namaaz ka poora tarika hai hi nahi. log kahte hai ki hadees me hai. to unse poochhiye ki sahabi log bina Hadees ke namaz kaise padhte the?
Right
Without Hadith you will become rudderless ship.
well said
thanx n jazakAllah qairun
The question concerns Hadith narrated by Bukhari and others. Most of the Hadith are oral transmissions from person to person and finally recorded as Hadiths. With the passage of time, changes can happen with oral transmission (human memory and personal preference), and therefore, if the Hadith does not conform to the Quran, it must be rejected. Most Hadith must be rejected on this basis.
boncela jan We kindly differ on this position . We do not have to reject Hadith simply because it seems to contradict the Qur'an. We will try to find the context of that Hadith and try to use our scholarship to find a reason and contetext for any such Hadith. Yes if we cannot find any reason or context of any Hadith that is contradiction with Hadith we shall surely raise our concerns over its authenticity.
You can check out our approch in analysing Hadith here : Understanding Hadith | Javed Ahmad Ghamidi: ua-cam.com/play/PLucOobAkGHmS9u4q5_ZqszjO-uHM9BO10.html
The way ahadis were searched and gathered and relevant scrutiny and above all time factor and time span creates doubts. For instance the period which was of intimidation of Imams and ahlul byts and rule of Banu Ummayyid and Banu Abbasids who were hell bent insulting and killings of Ahlul byts did not allow any thing which glorified family of prophet sawaw. Instead concentrated out of way to glorify Muavia, Abubakr (r), Umar(r), Usman(r) and so on. Those who collected such ahadis were afraid of those rulers and accordingly skipped very important events. This four Maslaks also part of such process. I'm sunni hanafi, but have nagging doubts weather my belief can fetch me jannat or may end up as a Shia aane Yazid bin Muavia bin Abu Sufiyan Marwood!!!!!!!
@AlMawridHind
A superfluous statement in defiance of the Quran's own commands. The Quran on multiple occasions asserts itself as the only source of divine law necessary or valid for Islamic life. It questions directly which hadith will they believe in after this. Blatant contradictions with the Quran are inherently wrong and to be discarded
excellent
Good ; 🌷🌷🌷
Please provide me dalil of performing namaaz 5 times by jews and christian, before muhammed ( SAW)
Please Check : www.javedahmadghamidi.com/%20meezan/view/history_of_the_prayer
Read Dr Abdul Wadud The Timings of Salat
Mawrid, your link is dead
Love you ghamdi saab want to meet you
Or jo nabi ay un ki hadith q ni kisi ne likhi ?
پھر بغیم بینہم کیا ہے؟ ولا تفرقوا کیا ہے؟ دراصل اختلافات ایک سنگین آزمائش ہیں کہ صحیح مومن کون ہے. اور قرآن کریم کی آیات ہیں کہ ہم ان اہل علم کے اختلافات میں بھی سچے مومن و مومنہ کو صحیح راستہ بتاتے ہیں...زمانہ کتنا ہی پر فتن اور پرآشوب ہو، ہدایت کا ذمہ اللہ کا ہے بشرطیکہ ہم حقیقی مومن ہوں.. بے شمار احادیث ایک ہی واقعہ اور سنت کو اختلافی طور پر بیان کرتی ہیں ایسے میں اللہ ہی صراط مستقیم کی ہدایت دیتا ہے اور ضرور دیگا.... رب زدنی علما
I need subtitle
Javed sahab ki baaz bate qurane hakim ke khilaf hain
quran is enough for us,no need hadees to make us confuse
You are wrong dear...There are many things in Qur'an which can't be understood and practiced without Sahi Hadith.
Example:Offer Salah but "How" says Hadith
@@truthseeker586 no you are wrong. Ye sab ummat ke iztima se muntaqil Ho rha hai. Kya aapna namaz kabhi kisi kitaab m dekh kar padhi hai.
@@gousayazamofficial7819 yes
@@truthseeker586 Allah is telling us that even Mushrikeen of Makkah used to pray Salaat:
Quran 8:35 - Their prayer (salaat) at the House is nothing but whistling and clapping. So taste the punishment because you were disbelievers!
Salaat is a very old practice and has been practiced by all previous nations this is why if you look at rituals of all major world religions especially christanity and judaism, one sees standing, bowing and prostration. When Quran says offer salaat, the arabs already knew what salaat was and how to pray it as 8:35 tells us.
@@tausif3k this doesn't mean we should neglect Hadith
Ek baat samajh nhi aayi ki agar namaz pehle se hi paanch waqt thi to rasulullah (saw) ne shabe meraj me moosa alaihissalam se milkar 50 namazo ko 5 kiya is riwayat ka kya
@@asalatkhan2734 link send kar do
Aapne khud hi keh diya “is riwayat ka kya” to lihaza riwayaten, riwayaten hoti hain, sach nahi.
Audio quality poor.
"Yeh (Sunnat) kisi riwaayat per mabni nahi" - Ghamidi
Uske baawajood, aap apni issi baat ki daleel Ahadeeth aur Sira literature ki riwaayat se de rahe hain.
Assalam allaikum.woh 27 sunnaten kon kon si hain ?
Go to his website almawrid ask a quick there he will answer
Yeh Sunnat ka ijma documented hai kahin? Iss baat ki kya guarantee hai ke aaj jo Namaz aap parhte hain, yehi namaz RasoolALLAH ne parhaayi thi? Islam ka revival shuru ek sheher (Makkah) se hua tha. Aur phir taweel arsay mei futuhaat ke zariye dusray areas mei pohancha. Toh kya yeh mumkin nahi ke mukhtalif areas mei 1400 saal baad koi Sunnat amal modify hogaya ho, chaahay bad-niyyati se ya galti se?
Yeh jo aaj itne mazay se aap Ahadeeth ki (Sunnat mei) ehmiyat ko radd karte hain, iska aapko andaaza tab hota jab Ahadeeth mojood he na hotin. 1400 saal baad paida hone wala musalmaan hamesha iss shak mei rehta ke Sunnat 1400 saalon mei badal gayi hogi. Lekin Ahadeeth ke hone se yeh shak sirf 200 saalon ka hogaya hai. Ahadeeth koi alag se ilm ya kitaaben nahi, balke 200 saal baad hone wali Sunnat ki documentation hain.
Jo log yeh sawaal poochte hain ke "Ahadeeth ki kitaaben aanay se pehle ke Musalmaan kese Deen pe chalte thay?" Unke liye jawaab yeh hai ke Ahadeeth ko kitaabon ki soorat mei compile sirf 200 saal baad kya gaya tha. Lekin Nabi ka ilm aur taalimaat toh mojood he thin usse pehle ke Musalmaanon mei. Kyunke unhone direct Nabi se seekha tha, aur woh Nabi ke waqt se nazdeeq thay; issi waja se unke liye Ahadeeth ka kitaabi soorat mei hona zaroori nahi tha. Hamare liye zaroori hai.
Ap ki itlah k liya arz ha k sunnat fiqa ki kitabo ma documented ha jo hadith sa pahla ki ha.imam malik imam hanifa tabai tha jinho na sahaba sa sekh kr drj kya. Sunnat ko jama krna fiqa ka kaam tha.
Hadith pr to aaj b doubt uthta ha to kya logo na namaz parhna chor d ha kya subcontinent ma hadith ki kitaabo sa nimaz sikhai gai.
Hadith sirf documented history ha rasool Allah saw k zamane ki.
Agr ya shariyat hoti to khulga rashdeen in ko b record krwate.
@@DanishAli-rm2ky
Acha? Zara naam bata na Imam Malik aur Imam Abu Hanifa ki Sunnat/Fiqh ki kitaabon ke. Aur unke book cover ki ek tasweer bhi bhejna please.
Doosri baat, Muhammad (pbuh) ki wafaat 630 mei hui thi. Abu Hanifa aur Maalik ki birth 699 aur 711 mei hui thi. Jo Sahabi 5-6 saal ke hon Nabi ki wafaat ke waqt, woh inn dono ki birth ke waqt 75, 85 saal ke honge. Toh phir kitne aisay Sahaba thay jinse inn dono ne direct seekha tha? Aur unke zara naam bhi bata dena please.
Teesri baat, Fiqh ka Sunnat se bohat bohat bohat chhota sa overlap hai. Fiqh ziadatar unbacked/unsupported jurisprudence hai "uss waqt ke" masaail se tackle karnay ke liye. Usme Quran, Sunnat, Hadith, Ijma, Qiyas, Ijtihad ke combination se fatway hotay hain.
Chotthi baat, Imam Maalik ne bhi Hadith ki kitaab compile ki thi jisko Al-Muwatta kaha jata hai. Woh probably pehli Hadith ki kitaab hai.
Paanchvi baat, agar Sunnat document hui thi aur Sahaba se seekhi thi, toh phir Imam Abu Hanifa aur Imam Maalik ka aksar baaton mei ikhtilaaf kyun hai?
Chhati baat, Sahaba ne toh Sunnat ko bhi document nahi karaya tha. Toh aapka yeh wala point Hadith ke khilaaf meaningless hai. Sahaba ko ilm tha Hadith aur Sunnat ka, unko zaroorat mehsoos nahi hui inhe document karnay ki. Behtar yehi hota ke woh future generations ke liye kar dete. Khair, Ma Sha ALLAH.
Aakhri baat, Ghamidi ka nazariya Sunnat ko leke woh nahi hai jo aap bata rahay hain. Unke hisaab se Sunnat amali tawaatur (action based version of Chinese whisper) se ayi hai. Bilkul wese he jese Hadith qauli tawaatur (Chinese whisper) se ayi hai. Farq bas yeh hai ke Hadith 100-200 saal baad document hogayi thi achi khaasi scrutiny aur effort ke saath lekin inke fehem wali Sunnat aaj tak nahi hui hai 1400 saal se.
These are God's revelations (Quran) that We recite to you with truth, so in which hadith other than God and His revelations (Quran) do they believe? 45:6
Which hadith after it (Quran) do they believe in? 7:185
Understand the meaning of these 2 ayats first
تو وہ مولوی جو کہتے ہیں کہ نماز کا تحفہ ہمیں معراج سے ملاُ۔ آپ سے پہلے پچاس نمازیں تھیں ۔ اور کچھ کہتے ہیں کہ اور نبی نماز نہیں پڑھتے تھے ان کا الگ انداز تھا عبادت کا ۔۔ لیکن آپ نے کُچھ اور کہہ دیا
Yeh jo aap n bataya k namaz aur se bahar Deen nhi h yeh glt baat h
Namaz Deen k hissa h Deen nhi .
Aur 2 cheez Sabse zada zaroori h Deen Quran aur ahlebait aur aapne ahlebait k bare zikr hi nhi kia
Namaz ki zuban agar arbi rahi to paighmbar kuch ki zuban arbi to nahi thi,,,
Wo to koum ki zuban Bolte the
kya muslims ko quran hadith or sunnah teno pe aml karna lazmi hain
No, only the Quran.
Javed Ghamdi is trying to equate the authenticity of the Qur'an with so called "sunnah". Whilst he Qur'an authenticates itself and puts the responsibility of its preservation in God's hands, it makes no such reference to "sunnah of Prophet Muhammad”. Indeed the only responsibility of the Prophet was to recite the Qur’an only, clearly and verbatim. There is no instruction to the Prophet to teach or transmit his “sunnah” and expect people to “copy” certain rituals. Large numbers of people doing some rituals is not proof of authenticity otherwise we should accord the same respect to rituals found in all the religions. To compare sunnah transmission with the existence of Mogul rule is a false analogy; the Moghuls did not leave certain rituals for their descendants to copy - that’s not how the governance works! The issue is not whether an Islamic empire was established but whether Prophet Muhammad taught five ritual acts as the basis of deen or religion. Despite Ghamdi's claims there is little evidence to show that Prophet Muhammad’s mission was to rediscover and transmit Prophet Abraham’s rituals eg slaughtering animals all over the world - how does that even improve the lives of individuals or wider human society? It seems to be a deviation from the Qur’an which declares itself as the only guidance and complete guidance sent by God and was the only book recited by Prophet Muhammad.
I wish we listen to Phds and higher level educated ppl about their subjects speciality...otherwise we wud stay w our heads up our asses...God bless
@@ima3218 Btw, it's spelt "arse". Yes, feel free to stick it up the arses of people with Phds!
Hadiths are from Satan. Quran is from God Almighty
غامدی صاحب آپ نے اتنی باتیں موضوع سے ہٹ کر کہی ہیں اور قرآن سے انکا کوئ ثبوت نہیں دیا۔ نبیوں کی سنت قرآن میں کہاں بتائ گئ ہے؟ سنت کے معنی ہین آپ نے نہیں بتاۓ۔ ہم جسے سنت کہتے ہیں وہ محمد عس کے تواتر کے ساتھ کیۓ ہوۓ اعمال ہیں جنکا قرآن میں کوئ ذکر نہیں ہے۔ سنت محمد عس یا سنت رسول کے الفاظ قرآن میں بھی نہیں ہیں۔یہ سنتیں بھی محدثین نے سن کر بغیر کسی ثبوت کے اور گواہوں کے اپنے غلط معیار کہ یہ راویان سچے سمجھے جاتے تھے۔ یہ معیار سچائ کا قرآن کے خلاف ہے۔ سچائ قرآن سے یا گواہوں سے معلوم ہوتی ہے۔ اور گواہ نہ ہوں تو حدیث کہنے والا اللہ کو حاضر و ناظر مان کر کہتا ہے کہ اگر یہ حدیث یا سنت جھوٹی ہو تو اللہ،کی مجھ پر لعنت ہو۔ قرآن کے سچائ کے پیمانے استعمال ہی نہیں کیۓ گۓ تھے۔ یہاں تک کہ محدثین بھی قرآن سے شاید ناواقف تھے اس لیۓ نہ تو انہوں نے راویوں سے پوچھا کہ یہ بات یا عمل محمد عس قرآن کی کس آیت کے مطابق ہے۔ آپ کوئ سنت کی مثال دیتے تو میں جواب دیتا۔ میرا آپکو کھلا چیلینج ہے کہ سنت یا حدیث کی کوئ مثال دے کر مکمل اسناد کے ساتھ لکھیں اور اسے قرآن کے مطابق ثابت کریں۔ مثلا” معراج کی سب حدیثیں قرآن کے خلاف اور جھوٹی ہیں۔آپ نے جو روزوں کے بارے میں کہا ہے کہ دوسری قومیں بھی روزے رکھتی تھی، تو ثابت کریں کہ یہ کسکی سنت یا حدیث ہوئ؟ آپ قرآن کی پیروی اور اسی کی تبلیغ کرتے رہنے کے احکامات سے کیا کفر کرتے ہیں؟ جب اللہ نے سنت اور حدیث محمد عس کو ماننے کا کہا ہی نہیں تو آپ غیر از قرآن بات یا عمل مان کر کیا کفر قرآن اور شرک نہیں کر رہے ہیں؟جواب کا طلبگار ہوں۔
20% Islam comes from Quran, 60% from Hadith, 20% from Sira. Muslim who reject Hadith and believe in Quran only becomes apostate by default. Muhammad's words and deeds are Sunnah. All 3 Islamic books Quran Hadith Sira were written after Muhammad's death under Caliph's supervision.
Who gave u this percentage whole islam is written and preserved in quran
@@faysalqayyum I research and study Arabic Quran Hadith Sira from A to Z. Quran is incomplete. Pakistani Quran is different than Saudi Arabian Quran.
@@anahaqq what , Pakistani Quran and Saudi Quran is different.
Can you prove it.
All these comes from 0% of your knowledge 😂
I'm sorry sister!, im just kidding, don't take it literally
We shouldn't divide it into percentage, Quran is complete in its own way. ALLAH knows best
@@mohamedabrar8890 I know best. allah idol knows nothing.
yeh apko kisne bataya apko prove diyee ki 5 waqt namaaz farz kari thiii phele quraan say sabit karee
Quran Millat E Ibraheem hai isliye namaz bhi Ibraheem se aai hai.
Seedhi simple si bat yahoodiyo Ka maksad hi yahi hai new nasal musalmano ke Dil se masjid aqsa ka khayal hi nikal Jaye ..
Aur ye niklega kaise jab hadis ko chhod denge tab new nasal musalman bhool jayegi koi tawajjo na denge yahoodiyo ne hadis e munkar ko paida hi is liye Kiya taki new nasal musalmano ke Dil se aqsa Ka khayal hi nikal Jaye taki jab wo masjid ko giraye tab koi khada na ho unke samne
You are wrong, and it is ironic what you said! Actually Muslim religious scholarship was heavily influenced by Jewish scholarshp. Within Judaism there is the Torah (the word of God) and then there is the Talmud, collection of rabbinical teachings. The Talmud allowed Jewish scholars to make a religion of their own. This is exactly what Muslim scholars did with Hadith collections, make a religion with laws and rules of their own.The Quran could not be changed as its sanctity is guaranteed by Allah, even though attempts were made with such ideas as "abrogation" of Quranic verses and "hadith qudsi." There is no basis in Quran for these concepts, they are the creation of scholars! The Quran itself declares that it is the only authentic book of Islam! By following hadiths we are following a religion made by the scholars, by following the Quran only we are following Allah's commands!
One who does not believe in Ahadith and speaks about guidance should know that he is wandering in the gorge of darkness.
These are God's revelations (Quran) that We recite to you with truth, so in which hadith other than God and His revelations (Quran) do they believe? 45:6
Which hadith after it (Quran) do they believe in? 7:185
"Guidance" and "Ahadith" should never be in the same sentence.
Because the only Book of Guidance is Qur'an.
"This [Qur'an] is guidance."
_(Surah Al-Jaathiya 45: Verse 11)_
"This [Qur'an] is a clear statement to [all] the people and a guidance and instruction for those conscious of Allah." _(Surah. Aal-i-Imraan 3: Verse 138)_
"This is the Book about which there is no doubt, a guidance for those conscious of Allah -" _(Surah Al-Baqara 2: Verse 2)_
"Then in what statement after the Qur'an will they believe?" _(Surah Al-Mursalaat 77: Verse 50)_
Ghamidi saahab.
ADAM (as) ?
Per Kaun Si Kitaab Naazil Hui ?
Wo nabi thy unko un se phly koi insan hi na thaa moujud na shareat to zahir se baat he wo nabi thy to shareat bhi di gai unko.
Qayamat mein kis cheez se tumhara hisaab hoga? to ye kahega Quran se. Isko pucho sare nabi kis kitab per gawahi denge? aur wo apne gawah bhi pesh karenge kis kitab per? har nabi ki ek ek kitab layi jayegi? to ye kahega ke nahi Ek hi kitab layi jayegi. Jo ke Umul kitab hai.
Quran padho surah Zumar ayat 69 Insha Allah iska jawab mil jayega.
Ye video wala jhoot bolta hai. Hamara hisaab sirf Quran se hoga aur kisi kitab se nahi. Allah ke liye samajh jao.
matlab yeh hai ki 5 waqt ki namaz isa Alai salaam say sabit kare
Islam kya hai? Millat E Ibraheem ! And Allah , Prophet Muhammad ko kya kehta hai Quran me? Ibraheem ka deen follow karne ke liye! To uss tarah agar Muhammad, Ibraheem ke follower hain to 5 waqt bhi Ibraheem se hai.
unka kahna hai ki Rasool Allah ne kahin kuchch ezafa kya kahin kuchch tarmeem karke khain waise hi aage sanction kar diye
Baqool .....maulana tariq jameel ya patri se bilkul utar chuka ha.