ACB Questions US Solicitor General On Doctors Having ‘Conscience Objections’ To Providing Abortions
Вставка
- Опубліковано 25 бер 2024
- On Tuesday, Justice Amy Coney Barrett questioned US Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar about conscience objections to abortion.
Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:
account.forbes.com/membership...
Stay Connected
Forbes on Facebook: forbes
Forbes Video on Twitter: / forbes
Forbes Video on Instagram: / forbes
More From Forbes: forbes.com
It's so disheartening to watch ACB playing Supreme Court Justice!
"Do not interrupt a person who is about to win the Darwin Award."
If democrats want to 0ff their future voter base, is there somewhere I can donate to?
Yes, just vote BLUE!
@@Dan-sc7usThe chamber of commerce, tax base, and real estate investors (in other states - outside here in Ca) 100% agree with you!
Whether pro-choices is on the ballot or not is irrelevant, "Women of America" if you want your rights back, not to mention keeping their freaking hands off of our social security and entitlements, Vote straight ticket Democrat. 100%
Biden /Harris 2024
Corrupt Joe has done enough damage to our country, economy, border, debt/deficit spending, crime, free speech, media bias and inept foreign and domestic policy. He, Soros, WEF and the left would lose in a landslide if free & fair elections were possible.
But free & fair aren't in the left playbook, or their allies in media, pharma, education (indoctrination) and the bureaucrats who allow the corruption.
Never vote democrat unless you hate the American constitution and love China. And oh, btw, no provisions or laws in the constitution regarding murdering the unborn so no federal oversight required. The scotus was right to let the people of each state decide.