OFFICIAL MERCH: www.indepthcine.store/ Here are the budgets adjusted for inflation: Fear And Desire $500,000 A Clockwork Orange $13 Million The Shining $63 Million What's your favourite Stanley Kubrick film?
Paths of Glory. Whilst it is one of Kubrick's earlier films, I also think it is maybe his greatest. It doesn't have the visuals of 2001: A Space Odyssey or Barry Lyndon and it isn't a big as Spartacus but it is perfect story telling and is maybe the greatest war movie ever made.
I read somewhere that Kubrick cried at a screening of Fear and Desire, because the audience would laugh at moments that were meant to be dramatic. Later, I believe he tried to get ahold of as many copies as possible and thus take them out of circulation, because he was so unhappy with how it turned out.
That story sounds dubious. "Legend has it . . ." stories are pretty much the same as "There's no legitimate source for this story." You are correct though, is saying how he was unhappy with the film. In later years, he wrote it off an embarrassing work by "a bumbling amateur."
@@TheStockwell Could be. I now looked up the source, by the way. I read it in an essay in the volume "The Stanley Kubrick Archives" entitled "Early Work", by Gene D. Phillips. The sentence in question is: "A member of the film's crew who was present recalled that Kubrick wept when some moviegoers had tittered at Mazursky's performance during the film." I don't find it implausible at all, given his age and probably high hopes for the project at the time.
@@videotrash I humbly acknowledge that you have your facts correct. Yes - people DO concede defeat on UA-cam! 😉 I own that book - it's terrific. If it says Kubrick was in tears, I believe it - and you! Have a safe and interesting week. ☺
I would love to see the Coen brothers Bloodsimple - 1.5 Million The Big Lebowski - 15 Million True Grit - 38 Million or maybe James Cameron The terminator - 6.4 Million Aliens - 18.5 Million Avatar - 237 Million
We need one of these on: The Coen brothers Denis Villeneuve Wes Craven J.J. Abrams The Wachowski's David Fincher Paul Thomas Anderson Love In Depth Cine!
“Making it through” one of your videos, you make it sound like I struggle lol. These are a breeze hehe. And I’d love to see a video on Michael Apted, I this he’s be a real interesting subject since he’s done so many different kinds of movies, both narrative features and documentaries lol
He had pretty similar budgets, had advantage because he had experience with people around him and film and his dad was pretty popular, pretty high arthouse following , but not high enough because he didn’t make mainstream movies
You can definitely see the perfection in his camera moves and shots in The Shining, which really elevates the going mad cabin fever narrative with tension and suspense.
Don’t know if you’ve done it already but i would love to hear a Christopher Nolan one. He had an ultra low budget for following, medium memento and the prestige, then high for dark knight inception and interstellar.
I really enjoyed this video, and I didn't expect to get a history of the director. Nice work, now I'll watch the other director features videos you made. ♥️
Excellent video! It's worth noting the German director Max Ophüls when describing Kubrick's approach to production, also. Not only was Ophüls' style a major influence on Kubrick's but also the way he budgeted his early films, particularly in the 1940s during the war. I see many similarities.
As always an exceptionally informative video. If you are covering directors, I would suggest Ridley Scott, with a large and varied filmography and a very technical knowledge, I image a video covering 3 different budgets would be very interesting.
5:39 lol..."stylistic traits carried over into his later films, such as realistic performances"...they say that as if that's a matter of the director wanting them, lol...like, director X says: "I like realistic performance", and director Y says: "I like fake performances", lol...I mean, yeah, sometimes they want it to look over the top (Kubrick is supposed to have wanted that for the general-character in Doctor Strangelove, going for the over-the-top takes every time, lol, having had him behave more realistically in other takes, something about him not telling the actor he would go for the over-the-top ones, something about him perhaps not potentially liking that), but you see what I mean...usually, everyone wants realistic performances...I've always wondered how Stanley Kubrick obtained them, lol...
It's like, lol, saying: "This composer wants good playing, this other composer wants bad playing", I mean, lol...or "The style of this general is to have brave soldiers, while the style of this other general is to have ones who are cowardly"...the question could be: "Why are there usually good players?", lol...anyway, lol, for acting, is it because of all his takes?...Lol...anyway, it's something I've wondered, I suppose one can say it's his style, but it's hard to imagine someone who wouldn't have wanted it, and that just willing it can make it happen..
While I understand the importance of his films, they've never really been for me. Too many 'visionary' sequences without a focus on the story and characters (and if it about those things, it's usually more obscure). I understand though I must be in the minority in the film community at least hehe! I concede I do think Dr. Strangelove is clever + hilarious and 2001 is a technical marvel
The Shining is one of the scariest movies i've seen at its not really that scary, its just insanely eerie and weird, an experiece very few films can have an affect on you but to an extent I agree some parts of his work is pretty pretentious IMO.
Before I watch this, do you take inflation and other economic realities over decades into account when you’re dealing with money, budgets, studio financing issues, etc. Because so many well-meaning cinema analysts stupidly fail to do so. Drives Me nuts.
A Clockwork Orange looks horrible, aesthetically speaking. Everything is designed in the worst 70's way possible. And the acting... It is overacting throughout, the characters reminds me more of grotesque puppets than real people.
@@Spod1s No dear. It is a mistake. And it's also a mistake to naively believe that Kubrick made everything absolutely perfect. Of course he didn't. Not even Shakespeare did it.
OFFICIAL MERCH: www.indepthcine.store/
Here are the budgets adjusted for inflation:
Fear And Desire $500,000
A Clockwork Orange $13 Million
The Shining $63 Million
What's your favourite Stanley Kubrick film?
2001: a space odyssey.
a clockwork orange
2001: A Space Odyssey, followed quite closely by Barry Lyndon. Great job on this, I really enjoy these budget level examples.
All !
Paths of Glory. Whilst it is one of Kubrick's earlier films, I also think it is maybe his greatest. It doesn't have the visuals of 2001: A Space Odyssey or Barry Lyndon and it isn't a big as Spartacus but it is perfect story telling and is maybe the greatest war movie ever made.
I read somewhere that Kubrick cried at a screening of Fear and Desire, because the audience would laugh at moments that were meant to be dramatic. Later, I believe he tried to get ahold of as many copies as possible and thus take them out of circulation, because he was so unhappy with how it turned out.
That story sounds dubious. "Legend has it . . ." stories are pretty much the same as "There's no legitimate source for this story." You are correct though, is saying how he was unhappy with the film. In later years, he wrote it off an embarrassing work by "a bumbling amateur."
@@TheStockwell Could be. I now looked up the source, by the way. I read it in an essay in the volume "The Stanley Kubrick Archives" entitled "Early Work", by Gene D. Phillips. The sentence in question is: "A member of the film's crew who was present recalled that Kubrick wept when some moviegoers had tittered at Mazursky's performance during the film." I don't find it implausible at all, given his age and probably high hopes for the project at the time.
@@videotrash I humbly acknowledge that you have your facts correct. Yes - people DO concede defeat on UA-cam! 😉 I own that book - it's terrific. If it says Kubrick was in tears, I believe it - and you! Have a safe and interesting week. ☺
@@TheStockwell Haha, I appreciate it. Same to you!
He used to try and smash copies from the local video store in England.
I would love to see a episode about David Lynch
This
Yes please
I agree! Please! Mullholand and lost Highway for sure.
eraserhead, blue velvet, mulholland drive
The Return has to be in it considering it’s his most expensive work yet
I would love to see the Coen brothers
Bloodsimple - 1.5 Million
The Big Lebowski - 15 Million
True Grit - 38 Million
or maybe James Cameron
The terminator - 6.4 Million
Aliens - 18.5 Million
Avatar - 237 Million
I would love to see James Cameron
We need one of these on:
The Coen brothers
Denis Villeneuve
Wes Craven
J.J. Abrams
The Wachowski's
David Fincher
Paul Thomas Anderson
Love In Depth Cine!
Everytime I see Kubrick's works, I feel inspired
It's like stepping into his mind
Baby Stanley Kubrick is absolutely not how I would have pictured him without the beard. I thought he was born with it.
I would love to see one on John Carpenter, he really got the most of a budget, large or small.
RLM just did a 3 part retro. Check it out. Not tech heavy though like this channel. Still fun
“Making it through” one of your videos, you make it sound like I struggle lol. These are a breeze hehe. And I’d love to see a video on Michael Apted, I this he’s be a real interesting subject since he’s done so many different kinds of movies, both narrative features and documentaries lol
My favourite director. Amazing, detailed, professional video as always.
We need a PTA edition of this!
Hard eight, boogie nights and phantom thread maybe?
He had pretty similar budgets, had advantage because he had experience with people around him and film and his dad was pretty popular, pretty high arthouse following , but not high enough because he didn’t make mainstream movies
The video we’ve all been waiting for
You can definitely see the perfection in his camera moves and shots in The Shining, which really elevates the going mad cabin fever narrative with tension and suspense.
Don’t know if you’ve done it already but i would love to hear a Christopher Nolan one. He had an ultra low budget for following, medium memento and the prestige, then high for dark knight inception and interstellar.
What a truly wonderful episode. I enjoyed it very much and learned some new things about directing. Thank you!
Do Paul Thomas Anderson next!
I'm sure he's already done a video on him at three budget levels, but I can't find it on his channel anymore. Did he take it down?
Thanks once again for a wonderful Essay and experience, very well explained, with the best talking tempo and emotion with the perfect edit. As always
damn bro great time to be alive, this videos are pure f gold
Beautiful epesoide and explanation... I would love to see more Kubrick content... ☺️👍🏻
AWESOME!!! I think I requested this.
OH MY GOD! I'VE BEEN WAITING FOR THIS FOR A VERY LONG TIMEEEE!!!
I really enjoyed this video, and I didn't expect to get a history of the director. Nice work, now I'll watch the other director features videos you made. ♥️
Great vid. Would love to see you do Guy Ritchie or David Fincher
Such a good channel and such a good series. Kubrick is my no.1 guy. Keep up what u are doing here
Excellent video! It's worth noting the German director Max Ophüls when describing Kubrick's approach to production, also. Not only was Ophüls' style a major influence on Kubrick's but also the way he budgeted his early films, particularly in the 1940s during the war. I see many similarities.
I would love too see one of theese on Guy Rtichie, his movies realy fit well with the three budget format.
Would love to see one of these on PTA.
Please make a 3 level Budget series on Paul Thomas Anderson
Very informative and well done! Thank you for the effort you put into these videos! :)
Kubrick was a genious of CINEMA art and also indystry leading man..
I would like to see a video like this on Sergio Leone
Please follow up your video on Paul Thomas Anderson:
Hard Eight
Boogie Nights/Punch-Drunk Love
Phantom Thread
As always an exceptionally informative video. If you are covering directors, I would suggest Ridley Scott, with a large and varied filmography and a very technical knowledge, I image a video covering 3 different budgets would be very interesting.
David Lynch please!! Man's a legend ❤️ A legitimate genius.
David Fincher!
Great youtube Videos. please please dont stop i need you
Do Jim Jarmusch please!!
Love the video ! Good job
Brilliant, as always.
A darren aronofsky video would be cool
Will you ever do Peter Jackson?
finally from the goat!
I would love to see a video on Denis Villeneuve
Great video, thank you
I would love to see an episode on Satyajit Ray.
Fear and Desire - Should have been a film short not a feature.
Forgot to mention the moon missions, he had a $5000 budget for those
Also do Alfred Hitchcock
Would love to see Michael Mann
It would be cool to see some Korean directors like Park Chan Wook or Lee Chang Dong. Or I guess Bong Joon Ho.
Outstanding 🔥🔥🤩
The King
Great Video 👏
I’d like to see you do Robert Rodriguez.
Denis villeneuve next.
Please do Winding Refn!!!! From the Pusher trilogy to Drive / Neon Demon.....
Do David Fincher!
1. Se7en $33 million
2. The Social Network $40 million
3. Gone Girl $61 million
he's done him already
@@raydeo2584 Where's that? I don't see it!
@@davidle4936 sorry i thought he did do one, he must have done one on someone Fincher works with a lot and mentioned his name in it
Alfred Hitchcock next?
Could you make a video of how Guillermo Del Toro shoots a film at 2 budget levels?
people didn't like barry lyndon? that's one of my favourite of his!
I would like to see an episode about Peter Jackson
Out of curiosity, are your budgets adjusted for inflation?
would love to see paul verhoeven or hitchcock
What are your thoughts on Guillermo del Toro?
I think Kubrick drove BOTH Shelly Duvall AND Jack Nicholson crazy.
5:39 lol..."stylistic traits carried over into his later films, such as realistic performances"...they say that as if that's a matter of the director wanting them, lol...like, director X says: "I like realistic performance", and director Y says: "I like fake performances", lol...I mean, yeah, sometimes they want it to look over the top (Kubrick is supposed to have wanted that for the general-character in Doctor Strangelove, going for the over-the-top takes every time, lol, having had him behave more realistically in other takes, something about him not telling the actor he would go for the over-the-top ones, something about him perhaps not potentially liking that), but you see what I mean...usually, everyone wants realistic performances...I've always wondered how Stanley Kubrick obtained them, lol...
It's like, lol, saying: "This composer wants good playing, this other composer wants bad playing", I mean, lol...or "The style of this general is to have brave soldiers, while the style of this other general is to have ones who are cowardly"...the question could be: "Why are there usually good players?", lol...anyway, lol, for acting, is it because of all his takes?...Lol...anyway, it's something I've wondered, I suppose one can say it's his style, but it's hard to imagine someone who wouldn't have wanted it, and that just willing it can make it happen..
Do James Cameron next!
I would like to see the Coen brothers
A film every 3 years for that long is still quite a few
Nice. Stopped right as it was getting interesting, though...
Can you do Peter Jackson next Sam Raimi Gordon Parks and Spike Lee.
Spike Lee was done a few months ago
I would think Barry Lyndon would have cost the most
$13 million
To be fair- the shining s budget probably wouldn't have been as high if a set hadn't completely burned down. Thats probably quite a costly accident
I can respect Kubrick as a talented director, but his mistreatment of Shelley Duvall was unnecessary, and honestly, something that's very shameful.
Scorsese's abused women early in his career. Does that make you think less of him?
@@HBarnill ...yes?
@@HBarnill You should think less of anyone that abuses women. This shouldn't surprise you.
@@HBarnill Can you cite a source for that? Couldn't find anything.
@@MrStronglime It's in Easy Riders, Raging Bulls, a book about New Hollywood.
Andrei Tarkovsky, someday? 🤷♂️
While I understand the importance of his films, they've never really been for me. Too many 'visionary' sequences without a focus on the story and characters (and if it about those things, it's usually more obscure). I understand though I must be in the minority in the film community at least hehe! I concede I do think Dr. Strangelove is clever + hilarious and 2001 is a technical marvel
I always put my own imagination to use whenever I watch those typenof sequences.
The Shining is one of the scariest movies i've seen at its not really that scary, its just insanely eerie and weird, an experiece very few films can have an affect on you but to an extent I agree some parts of his work is pretty pretentious IMO.
OMG 2001: A Space Odyssey cost only 12 millions Budget!
2001 is the most expensive
Before I watch this, do you take inflation and other economic realities over decades into account when you’re dealing with money, budgets, studio financing issues, etc. Because so many well-meaning cinema analysts stupidly fail to do so. Drives
Me nuts.
With a small budget you either shoot a comedy or a drama....or something like blair witch amateur like.....
amazing like to dislike ratio. . . 1.4k likes with 3 dislikes
Nuri Bilge Ceylan
How are they making trash with like 100million dollars
A Clockwork Orange looks horrible, aesthetically speaking. Everything is designed in the worst 70's way possible. And the acting... It is overacting throughout, the characters reminds me more of grotesque puppets than real people.
it’s a satire dystopia it’s meant to be hard to watch
@@Spod1s It is simply ugly in the worst 70's style.
@@Stroheim333 it’s meant to be that way
@@Spod1s No dear. It is a mistake. And it's also a mistake to naively believe that Kubrick made everything absolutely perfect. Of course he didn't. Not even Shakespeare did it.
@@Stroheim333 if you read the book of a clockwork orange it is almost exactly like the film because it’s meant to be that way
Most overrated director... 2001 was the only watchable movie he ever made. If not, such a crap director