Hazard-Shift Masacre With Iceman | Season 49, War 5
Вставка
- Опубліковано 5 лип 2024
- In this alliance war video, we are trying to climb out of a 1-3 hole with a matchup against Nath.
00:00 - Intro and Team Assignment
00:22 - MASACRE (Iceman) // Node 9
02:41 - SHOCKER (Hulkling) // Node 18
04:06 - BISHOP (Iron Man) // Node 24
05:15 - KATE BISHOP (Iceman) // Node 33
06:03 - War Results
HOW TO SUPPORT THE CHANNEL
• ❤️ MEMBERSHIPS: / simula67
• 💲 DONATIONS: streamlabs.com/simula67
• 💲 PAYPAL: paypal.me/simula67
• 👕 MERCH: simula67.creator-spring.com/
HOW TO CONNECT WITH ME
• 🐦 TWITTER: / drewsamuto
• 💬 DISCORD: / discord
🎵 THE SWEET, SWEET TUNES YOU HEARD IN THIS VIDEO 🎵
• Music | Destabilized by PunchDeck
• Watch: • Punch Deck - Destabili...
• Promoted by @RoyaltyFreePlanet - royaltyfreeplanet.com
• Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 bit.ly/RFP_CClicenseo - Ігри
I didn't know Iceman was poison immune lol he wasn't getting any poison debuffs lol
i run all 4 fights on path 9 and have never really considered bringing someone who isn’t immune to both effect, do uou think it’s worth that added risk
It's definitely what I prefer, but it also depends on the defender and the tactic. In some fights (like the Shocker fight in this war) it's relatively simple to just back off and stall until it's safe to attack again. In this most recent war I had an Adam Warlock on 9a and the best option was to nuke him with Havok and powerback boosts but again I had to play around the poison phase. In other matchups, I feel much more comfortable with a double immune just because it's one less thing to focus on. There's a Kraven in the upcoming War 6 video that I would categorize as such.
@@simula67 sweet thank you i appreciate the in depth response i will definitely consider this more
@@IkarusTroy57 Happy to help. A lot of this just comes with experience. If your alliance plays war casually, experiment with different matchups. Or do so in the offseason when there’s no risk!
Shouldn´t iceman be globally banned?
Not in Tier 1