Asics Metaspeed Sky Paris vs Nike Vaporfly 3: Three runners give their verdict on the carbon racers

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 7 чер 2024
  • The Nike Vaporfly 3 and Asics Metaspeed Sky Paris are both impressive, lightweight carbon plate racing shoes that are great for events of any distance. Mike, Kieran and Nick have racked up the miles and raced in both shoes, and give their verdict on which you should get here.
    Check out our reviews of both shoes:
    Asics Metaspeed Sky Paris Review: • Asics Metaspeed Sky Pa...
    Nike Vaporfly 3 Multi-Tester Review: • Nike Vaporfly 3 Multi-...
    JUMP STRAIGHT IN:
    00:00​​​​ - Intro
    00:16 - Design & Key Stats
    02:25 - How’s The Fit
    05:56 - The Run Test
    17:55 - Verdict
    Subscribe to The Run Testers for more running gear reviews:
    ua-cam.com/users/TheRunTeste...
    Nike Alphafly 3 Review: • Nike Alphafly 3 Review...
    Hoka Cielo X1 Review: • Hoka Cielo X1 Review: ...
    Puma Fast-R 2 Review: • Puma Fast-R 2 Review: ...
    Saucony Endorphin Pro 4 Review: • Saucony Endorphin Pro ...
    New Balance SC Elite v4 Review: • New Balance SC Elite v...
    Best Carbon Plate Running Shoes 2023: • Best Carbon Plate Runn...
    Nike Alphafly NEXT% 2 Review After 230km: • Nike Alphafly NEXT% 2 ...
    Hoka Rocket X2 Review: • Hoka Rocket X2 Review:...
    Adidas Adizero Prime X 2 Strung Review: • Adidas Adizero Prime X...
    Best Super Trainers 2023: • Best Super Trainers 20...
    Mizuno Wave Rebellion Pro Review: • Mizuno Wave Rebellion ...
    Asics Superblast Review: • Asics Superblast Full ...
  • Спорт

КОМЕНТАРІ • 51

  • @supwell
    @supwell Місяць тому +17

    Oh my gosh guys thank you for putting out this video - everyone keeps coming at my neck about "plate position" and how you can only compare the sky Paris to the Alphafly 😂

  • @barneyreed2315
    @barneyreed2315 Місяць тому +7

    Very pleased with the VF3. Bought all the big dogs and kept with the VF3. Feels comfortable, fast and squishy

  • @Mr80Miles
    @Mr80Miles Місяць тому +13

    Not tried the VF3 but don’t particularly like the feeling of the VF2 or the way it makes me run, just too aggressive although very fast. Got the Sky Paris, fantastic shoe. Everything I was hoping it would be. I’m a midfoot striker and definitely a cadence runner!

    • @tayoidowu11
      @tayoidowu11 Місяць тому +2

      do U have link for discount's 😂

  • @davidpuschel8268
    @davidpuschel8268 Місяць тому +8

    I have both shoes and they feel so different.
    In the sky you need to be precise with your running form. But it’s absolutely amazing than, because you know you nailed it. You get more out of the shoe the more you put in. The 5MM
    drop makes you run natural.
    I would pick it for track miles and long distance running. If you’re a good runner you can use it for marathon.
    In the Nike is softer and more foregiving. 8mm drop makes you lean more. The shoe does a lot of work and you get less feedback. This shoe shines at 5k to halfmarathon in my opinion. For marathon alphafly is better option.

    • @pedrofilho6818
      @pedrofilho6818 Місяць тому +2

      Spot on, that’s what I think as well

  • @joshkneller
    @joshkneller Місяць тому +1

    Great review, and just goes to show how much of the feel is down to individual opinion! Kieran saying the Vaporfly is better when getting tired whereas Mike saying the Sky!
    Im still struggling to decide whether to go with the Sky Paris or Alphafly 3 for Boston (UK) marathon this weekend 🤔

  • @042766
    @042766 Місяць тому +2

    Just got sky and did a 10k - nice and easy will take it for the Brooklyn Half as opposed to my usual Pro 3. Also, I believe Kieran did a PB in the Manchester Marathon wearing the sky.

  • @waterfallstudios5746
    @waterfallstudios5746 Місяць тому +1

    I was waiting for this comparison, I ran Manchester Marathon in VF3 didn’t feel I would have had enough time test the ASICS to try them. VF3 was good for marathon and softer than VF2 and just as light I wouldn’t have trusted the VF2 for 26.2. I have the pretty much similar durability issue with the VF3 with only 40 odd miles but not that bad. Asics could be the shoe I go for at Berlin this year.

  • @HYPERC666
    @HYPERC666 Місяць тому +2

    I'm literally debating both these shoes for a half marathon i'm doing in August. Great timing

    • @pedrofilho6818
      @pedrofilho6818 Місяць тому +1

      I’m going with Vapor 3

    • @HYPERC666
      @HYPERC666 Місяць тому

      @@pedrofilho6818 I'm leaning this way. They are a few hundred bucks cheaper (Brasil). No review has been defnintive enough for me to side one way or another objectvely. So i'm thinking of leaning towards the vaporfly 3

    • @mohoes1337
      @mohoes1337 Місяць тому +1

      did the berlin half in ms sky paris, worked perfectly!
      i guess it depends on your feet :D

  • @shanemalaski1423
    @shanemalaski1423 Місяць тому +2

    Nick for strictly a fast 5k with little to no corners and flat would you pick vaporfly 3 or sky?

  • @rossfripp4503
    @rossfripp4503 Місяць тому

    I had an issue with the metaspeed sky with rubbing on my little toe =, so it was too narrow me. This wasn't an issue in the Vaporfly V2, Alphafly V1 or Endorphin Pro 3....is the Metaspeed Sky Paris no different in that regard, do you thjnk?

  • @codyharrison8511
    @codyharrison8511 Місяць тому

    when is the triumph 22 review coming?!?!

  • @kierenmoore3236
    @kierenmoore3236 Місяць тому

    Seems that, for a wider shoe and more cushioning, I want the Alphafly?

  • @romrome
    @romrome 15 днів тому

    Between the Sky Paris and the Edge Paris, which of the two closely resembles the ride of last year's Endorphin Pro 3?

  • @richardjellyman2457
    @richardjellyman2457 Місяць тому +6

    The sky Paris ripped my toes to shreds at Boston a few days ago.
    Id done about 25k before the marathon in them, but the pain and blisters came on from mile 6 onwards. Not sure why- maybe the long downhill not suited to my gait and this shoe.

    • @alex96super
      @alex96super 19 днів тому

      Sounds like you wore them too small

  • @jimoconnor8597
    @jimoconnor8597 Місяць тому +12

    17 minute marathon PR (3:08:22 @ 60 years old) in the VF 3 so I have to stick with them. Too hard to figure out Sky/Edge for me and can't spend $500 to figure it out...

    • @esquiveldani
      @esquiveldani Місяць тому

      arent they like 250?

    • @jimoconnor8597
      @jimoconnor8597 Місяць тому +3

      @@esquiveldani Yeah but you have to buy the Edge AND the Sky to figure out which model is best for you. So...$500

    • @dallan7740
      @dallan7740 Місяць тому +2

      ​@@jimoconnor8597I think you mean the Edge Vs Sky, no?

    • @JackD87
      @JackD87 Місяць тому +1

      Sky is better. I had both and am sending the Edge back. Join ASICS One club and you can use shoes for 90 days before sending them back.

    • @jimoconnor8597
      @jimoconnor8597 Місяць тому

      @@JackD87 Been a member since they started it. I still have to pay $500 in an attempt to figure out which shoe might work. Kinda dumb. I'll stick with the AF 3 (and all the other super shoes I have). I can't see how either of these shoes could be better for me.

  • @AbstractMexo
    @AbstractMexo Місяць тому

    Where can I get the pink VF3s

  • @mopoffool
    @mopoffool Місяць тому

    This is the first time I've heard you guys (Mike and Kieran in particular) directly contradict one another - not in your verdicts, but in the descriptions that led to them. That makes me appreciate your authenticity, but some day I hope to hear contradictions even in your verdicts.

  • @alexandernielsen7040
    @alexandernielsen7040 Місяць тому

    Never been a vaporfly fan myself, for the last few years ive only raced in takumi, they still feel "kinda old fashion "

  • @michaelb5432
    @michaelb5432 Місяць тому +3

    I'm glad Nike tried to be clever with the AF3 drops as I missed out and ended up picking up the Asics Edge Paris. Never had an Asics raceday shoe before so can't compare to previous editions but I do have the VF3 and I prefer the Edge.
    In terms of performance Nike been top of the pile for years in my opinion.. until now. The Edge Paris falls away on foot and the quickness in turnover I felt was incredible. Now there is recency bias and I have just run a 10k PB in my last race with them but I do really feel these are the best raceday shoe I currently have, and I have a lot! They are firmer than the VF3 but not firm, it's all relative and I prefer that feel, kind of like the Takumi Sen 8.
    The VF3 is a brilliant shoe of course but I'll be picking the Asics Edge Paris for my half next month.

  • @TheHutchRuns
    @TheHutchRuns Місяць тому

    VF3 a disappointment after the 1 & 2, Hoka Rocket X2 was best choice until the Sky Paris came along. For me it's the best 5k and 10k racing shoe and vies with the AF3 for half and above, although I'd probably still go AF3 for marathon.

  • @OrdMandrell1
    @OrdMandrell1 Місяць тому +2

    I've found the VaporFly's heavily discounted of late. Would still pick them over the Asics because of that.

  • @Fozzee.1970
    @Fozzee.1970 Місяць тому +22

    The Edge Paris is the better comparison.

    • @hamoudalnasser
      @hamoudalnasser Місяць тому +1

      Yeah, the Sky pairs better with the AlphaFly.

  • @karls8989
    @karls8989 Місяць тому +4

    do none of you run in the adios pro 3?? like make that comparison

    • @grantmckay7014
      @grantmckay7014 Місяць тому +2

      I just ran a marathon in the Adios Pro 3 but only because it was wet and the grip on it is good (only the DN Elite 2 has better grip but I wouldn't run past a half in them). The Adios Pro 3 is a solid shoe but there is no way I would choose it over the Vaporfly or EP3 in dry conditions.

  • @Crose46
    @Crose46 Місяць тому +2

    Vaporfly 2 or Sky paris for 5-10k racing?

  • @Fozzee.1970
    @Fozzee.1970 Місяць тому

    Funny I have much more volume in toebox on the Paris shoes.

  • @Lucky-lp8do
    @Lucky-lp8do Місяць тому +1

    why does nobody talk abt the metaspeed edge paris?

    • @TheBsheep
      @TheBsheep 16 днів тому

      The first version was a major fail, people said it was too firm and not enough foam under the forefoot and the first metaspeed sky was a really good shoe!...it was only until they brought out the Metaspeed edge plus, is when people gave it a chance. The update gave it a little more foam but by then, the damage was already done to it's reputation. But the Metaspeed edged Paris is finally starting to get some love, even though I still think many still feel the Sky Paris is the safer choice.

  • @theandroids
    @theandroids Місяць тому +1

    As much as I like the colour of the sky Paris, its not my colour. Hope they sont disappoint with the other colourways like they did with novablast 3.

  • @gtromble
    @gtromble Місяць тому

    Nike does not rhyme with Mike. Always grating to hear.

  • @kalaharikreef7371
    @kalaharikreef7371 Місяць тому

    Asics all the way.

  • @cravecrave93
    @cravecrave93 Місяць тому

    “Ass-sicks”

  • @davidpuschel8268
    @davidpuschel8268 26 днів тому

    Hello run-testers,
    I don’t get why you make these terrible fit-advices. In the same size the Nike is 0,5cm longer.
    So you can’t say they are both true to size. And this explains why you mentioned the roomier fit of the Vaporfly.

  • @michealGRuns
    @michealGRuns Місяць тому +1

    Honestly the VF3 is trash. Even the Endorphin Speed 4 is a better shoe, in my opinion