Canucks the Week: What the loss to Vegas means
Вставка
- Опубліковано 13 вер 2024
- Patrick Johnston joins Paul Chapman for Canucks This Week where they talk about what the loss to Vegas means, what the trades this week mean to the roster and how the schedule sets up for the team through the rest of December. A new feature debuts as Patrick tells you why the Canucks should be happy, and why they should be mad this week.
Canucks need to add another top forward and a third line defensive help
They have had a hot start and its been a nice suprise. But we’ve seen the basement that this core is capble of hitting, and it isn’t pretty. I think that its foolish to throw away the idea of a rebuild the minute boeser scored 4 in the firsr game.
Luckily, a lot of the contracts are coming off the books next year. So if we can draft well, we might look ok for the next 5 years. Vegas, LA, anaheim are all gonna be a force over the next decade. Its important not to get too hot or cold on these manners. The goal is the stanley cup and i’m not sure this core has what it takes to win it.
It means there really not that good and are not a lock for a playoff spot at least there fun to watch this year
it doesnt mean anything. Its one game in a long season. Yes they had some lapses but vegas plays the trap game so once you get a down a goal or two its almost impossible to come back. Every team has games they wish they played differently. Dont put any stock in this loss its just part of the season.
3 of the top 6 d core are 6" 5" or taller. the canucks have never been this big on the back end. kempe looks better than reichel.
Actually they have… Derk, Diduck and Murzyn were giants during the Pat Quinn era. That was the squad that pushed the Rangers to game 7 in the final.
Bear is not that great, Friedman is just as good and has more GRIT
Means nothing