hello mam, good evening! I was wondering if you could compare Shaw and Galsworthy as dramatists of problem play. I have a few points; could you please look them over and let me know if I'm working in the right direction? 1. Both Shaw and Galsworthy both dealt with issues with class difference, Shaw's problem plays had varied themes --from fallen women to hypocrisy in the romanticizing of war and love and hero, and many more, majority of Galsworthy's plays tried to expose the problems in the contemporary legal system (from solitary imprisonment to lives of people out of prison and so on). 2. Galsworthy was often very unbiased in his plays. He sympathized with the victims of society while rationally understood the administers of the law. Shaw's plays were didactic in the sense that even though his plays were plays of ideas, it was his opinion that was emphasized the most; he gave very clear cut confident opinions. This was also how he was different from Ibsen, I suppose. 3. Galsworthy's problem plays were serious. Shaw's was a very witty writer and all his plays were comedies even as they dealt with serious matters. He chose to satirize the hypocrisies of the society rather than mourning them. I couldn't think of any more difference.
There is also a novel 'Skin Game'
by Jim Butcher published in 2014😊
I must say she creates literature in literature, thank you for your support Ma'am
Excellent 😊 Mam
Watching this videos again for revision 😁
Thank u soo much ma'am for this amazing video as usual...💖
Thank you ma'am ❤️❤️
Like done'kay saath aayah hu 👍
hello mam, good evening! I was wondering if you could compare Shaw and Galsworthy as dramatists of problem play. I have a few points; could you please look them over and let me know if I'm working in the right direction?
1. Both Shaw and Galsworthy both dealt with issues with class difference, Shaw's problem plays had varied themes --from fallen women to hypocrisy in the romanticizing of war and love and hero, and many more, majority of Galsworthy's plays tried to expose the problems in the contemporary legal system (from solitary imprisonment to lives of people out of prison and so on).
2. Galsworthy was often very unbiased in his plays. He sympathized with the victims of society while rationally understood the administers of the law. Shaw's plays were didactic in the sense that even though his plays were plays of ideas, it was his opinion that was emphasized the most; he gave very clear cut confident opinions. This was also how he was different from Ibsen, I suppose.
3. Galsworthy's problem plays were serious. Shaw's was a very witty writer and all his plays were comedies even as they dealt with serious matters. He chose to satirize the hypocrisies of the society rather than mourning them.
I couldn't think of any more difference.
You are doing just right 👏👏
@@KalyaniVallath thank you so much mam
My dearrrrr ma'am
Forsyte saga
The man of property
In chancery
To let
😘😘😘😘😘