uear7070 Me neither, fed up of following TV tech (mobile tech too for the same reason) as they are always coming up with some bullshit every time the high end TVs end up £800 or less, unless I need a TV or phone and then I check options out but generally don't bother. I like reading about Intel/AMD/Nvidia's latest 2% performance increase every other week instead...
Search Quantum Dot OLED Hybrid on google. It's cool to know that people are already experimenting in combining the two together for the best picture possible.
I currently use a 40" 4k samsung TV with 60hz. Can watch movies and play games. aaand I can sit right in front of it. Pixel density is ok to be able to read everything. AND DAMN you have alot of space. I always cry when I sit in front of a 1080p 22" screen :D
+TinchoX well it's Overkill, but I love it! If you play a game that can't support 4k (one 980 isn't enough for alot of games, trust me) then you can play at 1440p and sit on your couch, Or play in window mode and have a "virtual" 27" screen. or even 1080p on a 24" whatever. Main reason for the 4k screen (1000 euros for a samsung) was: I used to have that 27" 1440p screen from korea. It was to small to watch movies. Also the Blacks are more like a medium gray. and alot of backlight bleed + one dead subpixel. I wanted a bigger screen so I can watch movies in my room (small apartment) also I didn't want to go back to 1080p, especialy on a wider screen. My Eyes would turn into blocks. I swear! so the only option was a nice 40" 4k Samsung smart TV The colours and the blacks are NUTS!!! also it can "simulate" 60fps. so I can play 30fps xbox games without getting cancer. I can even netflix and chill without powering up my Computer. Love that beast. But for gaming I recomend you to stick to a GOOD 27"ish 1440p screen.
Hi there. Maybe you could say something about touch screen latency. You know, when you draw something on a screen, you can clearly see that the line being drawn is chasing your finger instead of being sort of glued to it. With all these octa-core-amazing-and-oh-so-incredibly-fast processors, why does that even occur? Is this time interval between placing a finger on a screen and registering that by a device or between registering a touch by a device and representing it on a screen? Thanks, guys, for all the info you provide. Keep up the good work.
I like this video much more than the other one on QD TVs. Less is more in this case! Much more informative and easy to understand while not going into technicalities. Awesome! I remember the previous video as trying to jump over its head.. Keep up the good work.
The reason VHS beat Beatamax is because VHS was cheaper for both the consumer and the manufacturers. Betamax was superior in terms of video quality and the players were designed better, but it only goes to show that sometimes the less superior platforms wins. QDLCD just might be the death of OLED.
OLED is here to stay... the manufacturing costs of OLED screens is dropping fast and will continue to do so for a long time. When the OLED market reaches the bottom of its eventual pricing, it'll be FAR cheaper than LCD. Just think, only 7 years ago, Sony sold an 11" 540p OLED TV for $2500, and now LG is selling a curved 55" OLED TV for $500 cheaper... imagine where we'll be in another 7 years.
ShoteR Actually, OLED has an enormous potential to drop in price once manufacturing technologies advance. In ten years, a 50" OLED TV will probably cost $200. Plasma never had that chance because of the nature of the technology, but OLED screens can be produced without much more complexity than printing with an inkjet printer. I was about to argue that plasma suffered from burn-in, but OLED suffers the same fate due to aging, so I guess LCD has the upper hand in that one respect.
Richard Craig ShoteR Personally I think the quality of plasmas suffered in well-lit rooms compared to LCDs which lead to their demise as (in my experience) most people had well-lit, open living spaces. It will just depend on where you locate your screen. Plasmas for home theatres, LCDs for living spaces, "horses for courses".
***** I have a 50" Panasonic plasma, i also have 2 Samsung LCD's. The plasma is hands down a better picture, as far as burn in, mine has a screen saver that kicks in, it may use more energy but its a better picture, i even game on it, no refresh rate problems with a plasma.
as one doing research on this sort of thing, QDLCD is not really what the quantum dots are best used for. QDLED with titanium oxide nanostructures is much more efficient. can't say about its color vibrancy or display range tho. that's not what I work on.
I just got a 55” 5 series TCL QLED and it’s fucking awesome. At $430 it’s a steal. The blacks are also very black. Maybe not as much as OLED but for someone who’s not necessarily an enthusiast it’s still an amazing experience.
Its still an excellent TV, best at that price range. And I'm sorry it was late at night I watched this and English isn't my mother tongue so its not easy to focus on hearing everything they say in the video.
I don't see where the motion blur concerns for QLCD comes from. From what I understand from the video, the actual layer that determines light colour is unchanged compared to regular LCD. It's only the backlight that uses QD's instead of another phosphorescent material (carelessly called 'phosphor'), so the 'pixels' function exactly the same? That means same blur as for LCD.
Honestly I'd get a QD screen just because the technology is fuggin sweet. Like we live in an age where we can manipulate tiny, low-dimensional quantum systems to display hentai
For those interested in future tech, search Quantum Dot OLED Hybrid on google. It's cool that people are already experimenting in combining the two together for the best picture possible.
A future AFAP (and, yes, you should call it that) episode should be all about electricity - volts, watts, ohms, amps, etc., specifically how it relates to PC components.
If a monitor manufacturer comes out with an OLED with a 144hz refresh rate, make sure you give them crap for using a crappy scaler in there because the theoretical refresh rate of OLED is much, much higher than 144hz. ;)
+Bobby Geiser plasma.. their sub-field specs are the biggest joke in tv marketing ever. 600 hz sub-field = 10 x 60 hz = 60 hz lmao.. no wonder plasma died. nvidia's gsync module can do real 200 hz on computer monitors.
Techquickie Suggestion for future Fast As Possible: Electromagnetic Radiation. Could you also cover Electromagnetic hypersensitivity in the same video? Story time: I bought the new HTC One M9, great phone, but I have to return it due to constant headaches, nausea and other symptoms. I need more information on Electromagnetic Radiation to understand it better. Please consider it!
Linus, is it possible for you to make a video of a gaming pc for 2015? 1500$ up to 2000$ budget? but not water cooled. I wanna build my own too, and I kinda like to build what parts you will use. I'm planning to use the corsair 780T for my case.
I bought a QLED over an OLED because I want to use it as both a PC monitor and a gaming TV, not because it's cheaper. I don't want to worry about burn-in.
Could you do a FAP on what's the difference between CPU's and GPU's and why we cannot simply put two of the same in one system (i.e. motherboard) and do the same.
Well, the energy must come from somewhere, they need the backlighting to emit their own light. Quantum dots themselves are very difficult to excite with electricity alone, that's why thy use them incombination with light.
A big problem with OLED is the lifespan of the blue emitters Is that argument enough to consider a QLED over the OLED? I mean, it's not like I'd want to spend another 1.5K on a TV in 3-5 years of usage
Keith Strang What are you on? XP? Since Windows 7 Microsoft OS runs smoothly without any problems. CCleaner also cleans a lot of crap for you if you are too lazy to do this yourself.
Got a 4K Sony Bravia. X8550 I think it was called. Beautiful colors even though its an LCD panel. 100Hz panel and 200Hz motionflow provides good motion. But yeah I think TVs should have motion flow, it starts to look unnatural at 100Hz. But yeah I can even game on this TV, however the latency is more than an average monitor.
Turn off motion flow and the latency will go down. The panel is most likely 60 Hz, frame interpolation is just a technology to blend frames together and strobe the backlight faster. Frame interpolation does little for games beyond create artifacts and add latency.
I know you may think Im wrong but as I said the panel is 100Hz, not 60 like you would assume. Frame interpolation, the motionflow technology in this particular TV, makes it 200Hz. I know how to turn down the refresh rate, but I think it would bring the most natural movement if you could have high refresh rates with motion blur. The real world has an unlimited refresh rate, well a refresh rate the speed of light, but there is motion blur. So it would be quite more realistic.
Well, yeah, endurance of the organic compounds it's a challenge, but if it's solely for cinema, i dont mind a little blurriness, films that use fast panning and stupid parkinson-like filming are not my cup of tea, anyways. ;) If they can engineer an compound to keep a balanced colour output for around 8 to ten years... we wouldnt need any other screen technology haha.
even if lifetime was increased to 8-10 years, the blur is still a problem for many people and the price too. by the time oled yield is on par with lcd, they might have fixed lifetime issues and maybe even blur. but i don't think this will happen anytime soon. i think qled w/ hdr is gonna be big, while oled matures.
Blur is not that bad at all for movies, i've seen quite a lot of OLED displays lastly, and i couldnt see any blur at all with BluRay material. It might be a concern for videogames and such, but i dont NEED top notch video quality for games, so QLED is good enough for that. But cinema? Yeah, please, give me the highest contrast ratios and deepest blacks you can, i dont mind mild blur. Here at home i have a DLP projector, a Plasma, some TN LCD's, an IPS LCD, and a VA LCD. Plasma is the king in image quality, then there is a tie between the DLP and the VA, then IPS (nice colors but terrible bleeding), and of courste, useless TN after that. I lie, old discount CRT would be way ahead, even at 480i. So you can see, blacks are very important for me LOL. Let's hope OLED matures fast.
Don't know if it qualifies as a "as fast as possible", but could you do some stuff about gamepads (logitech g13, razer nostomo/orbweaver/tartarus, and/or any others i don't know of)? Really want one but not sure which. Leaning towards the g13 (mostly because its cheaper and layout).
so samsung quantum dot does absolutely nothing in terms of visual performance? why do they mention that their monitors get 125% of sRGB range if quantum dot does nothing? not hating on this vid, just hopefully someone can shed light on this
is it just me for isn't interesting that the oled screen was depicted as a curved screen; did he just choose that on random or are the oled curved screens more common place with oled ?
Quantum dot isn't its own thing exactly but like enhancing those ips/va/tn monitors, you can see this in the new msi mag monitor with qd which is an ips monitor at its core
Finally! An As Fast As Possible episode about something I've never heard of!
Wtf. You never heard of this?
Dorupero He's new here!
***** it happens Bro, the moment when you're left out!
uear7070 Me neither, fed up of following TV tech (mobile tech too for the same reason) as they are always coming up with some bullshit every time the high end TVs end up £800 or less, unless I need a TV or phone and then I check options out but generally don't bother.
I like reading about Intel/AMD/Nvidia's latest 2% performance increase every other week instead...
this series is not for stuff you never heard of its for stuff you have heard but have no clue what it actually means.
It's 2023 and a few days ago the researchers who invented quantum dots won a nobel prize in chemistry.
my favorite flavor of quantum dots is banana split.
Peanut-butter with toffee and brownie.
R u stupid u can't eat them
Du hell
Welcome to six flags.
WadurMelawn Ftw
"I bought an oled TV because it's organic" lol
about to join the quantum dot revolution
Search Quantum Dot OLED Hybrid on google. It's cool to know that people are already experimenting in combining the two together for the best picture possible.
@@CryptoJordanVR aaaaaaand LTT just uploaded a preview of Samsung monitor tech which does just this!
Just don't stick it in your body...
@@nikkinik4188 but I like the way it feels
can't wait for 4k 120hz Oleds
+Nosh Nosher OMG but 5000$ tho
I currently use a 40" 4k samsung TV with 60hz.
Can watch movies and play games.
aaand I can sit right in front of it. Pixel density is ok to be able to read everything.
AND DAMN you have alot of space.
I always cry when I sit in front of a 1080p 22" screen :D
+DESCENT, I'm sitting in front of a 20'' 900p. I would really want a 1080 bigger one :D
+TinchoX well it's Overkill, but I love it! If you play a game that can't support 4k (one 980 isn't enough for alot of games, trust me) then you can play at 1440p and sit on your couch, Or play in window mode and have a "virtual" 27" screen. or even 1080p on a 24" whatever.
Main reason for the 4k screen (1000 euros for a samsung) was:
I used to have that 27" 1440p screen from korea.
It was to small to watch movies.
Also the Blacks are more like a medium gray.
and alot of backlight bleed + one dead subpixel.
I wanted a bigger screen so I can watch movies in my room (small apartment)
also I didn't want to go back to 1080p, especialy on a wider screen. My Eyes would turn into blocks. I swear!
so the only option was a nice 40" 4k Samsung smart TV
The colours and the blacks are NUTS!!!
also it can "simulate" 60fps. so I can play 30fps xbox games without getting cancer.
I can even netflix and chill without powering up my Computer.
Love that beast.
But for gaming I recomend you to stick to a GOOD 27"ish 1440p screen.
+DESCENT can't wait for 16k 250hz Oleds ok no
Why dont just using black and white tvs? So you wont have trouble with colors...
+Zona ALG ikr
Because uncoloured TV doesn't look good...
Sonny back in my day we just had a stick n' hoop. Ahh the good days...
***** yes you can and it will look even better on a white and black tv...
〈LS〉 XeN it was a joke 😂
Could you do one on Chromatic Aberration since it's already started to ''grow'' on modern games?
Hi there.
Maybe you could say something about touch screen latency. You know, when you draw something on a screen, you can clearly see that the line being drawn is chasing your finger instead of being sort of glued to it. With all these octa-core-amazing-and-oh-so-incredibly-fast processors, why does that even occur? Is this time interval between placing a finger on a screen and registering that by a device or between registering a touch by a device and representing it on a screen?
Thanks, guys, for all the info you provide. Keep up the good work.
And now in 2022 you can have the Q and the O all in one TV! The QDOLEDLCD TV
I like this video much more than the other one on QD TVs. Less is more in this case! Much more informative and easy to understand while not going into technicalities. Awesome! I remember the previous video as trying to jump over its head.. Keep up the good work.
Still waitin' on that VRR 144Hz IPS 1ms display.
IPS inherently cannot reach 144hz. We will need a new display technology! It will be awesome though!
ASager30 Right. You know what I mean, tho. A fast AND color-accurate one is the supreme goal.
Acer Predator XB270HU
144hz IPS G-sync with 3ms response.
Linus has a video about it on Vessel.
ASager30 Not true, it's a historical limitation but not an inherent one.
*****
Acer Predator XB270HU
144hz IPS out the box.
2:23 Um… Why is motion blur handling a problem? Does using quantum dots in an LCD mean that the light will be slower to change?
"OMG they put the word quantum in it I need seven"
ahahah!
The reason VHS beat Beatamax is because VHS was cheaper for both the consumer and the manufacturers. Betamax was superior in terms of video quality and the players were designed better, but it only goes to show that sometimes the less superior platforms wins. QDLCD just might be the death of OLED.
Well Betamax also could not hold as much data. So really long movies one one cassette easier achieve with VHS.
OLED is here to stay... the manufacturing costs of OLED screens is dropping fast and will continue to do so for a long time. When the OLED market reaches the bottom of its eventual pricing, it'll be FAR cheaper than LCD. Just think, only 7 years ago, Sony sold an 11" 540p OLED TV for $2500, and now LG is selling a curved 55" OLED TV for $500 cheaper... imagine where we'll be in another 7 years.
Like PC vs Console scrubs.
Richard Craig 14 years is too long to wait for reasonable prices.
Don't forget the porn factor. VHS had it while Beta didn't
2:30 Oh, i thought you were asking why people still use motion blur and was about to caps "I KNOW RIGHT!"
OLED over GDLCD for me
***** unfortunately it seems just like the LCD vs Plasma thing , LCD was inferior but cheaper...
ShoteR Good thinking! I overlooked that part
ShoteR Actually, OLED has an enormous potential to drop in price once manufacturing technologies advance. In ten years, a 50" OLED TV will probably cost $200. Plasma never had that chance because of the nature of the technology, but OLED screens can be produced without much more complexity than printing with an inkjet printer. I was about to argue that plasma suffered from burn-in, but OLED suffers the same fate due to aging, so I guess LCD has the upper hand in that one respect.
Richard Craig ShoteR Personally I think the quality of plasmas suffered in well-lit rooms compared to LCDs which lead to their demise as (in my experience) most people had well-lit, open living spaces. It will just depend on where you locate your screen. Plasmas for home theatres, LCDs for living spaces, "horses for courses".
***** I have a 50" Panasonic plasma, i also have 2 Samsung LCD's.
The plasma is hands down a better picture, as far as burn in, mine has a screen saver that kicks in, it may use more energy but its a better picture, i even game on it, no refresh rate problems with a plasma.
You saved my ass man. It was for a school project. I've been watching your content for years now. Love it
Quantum dots were originally a tool used to take microscope images, as a much-more-easily tweakable marker as opposed to earlier fluorescent dyes.
A video about all these new mechanical switches comparing them to the "classic" Cherry MX Switches would be nice.
I like your channel so much because it's one of few that offers 4k resolution. :)
IMO, if Linus were to wear a green shirt that had the sponsors logo on it, I would definitely buy some shit
That would be the fucking best.
yes, cause they're using an greenscreen for the white background ans then the Sponsors Logo and Linus head would just fly in the air :D
as one doing research on this sort of thing, QDLCD is not really what the quantum dots are best used for. QDLED with titanium oxide nanostructures is much more efficient. can't say about its color vibrancy or display range tho. that's not what I work on.
I just got a 55” 5 series TCL QLED and it’s fucking awesome. At $430 it’s a steal. The blacks are also very black. Maybe not as much as OLED but for someone who’s not necessarily an enthusiast it’s still an amazing experience.
Damn u lucky
Sony have been using quantum dots displays for a while now. Why is this technology only getting noticed now?
Oh so that's why my 4K Sony TV has so good colors lol.
Because snazzy marketing!
wonderr Linus just bashed your Sony quantum dot. Were you so blind you didn't comprehend the video?? Bahhh Bahhh
Its still an excellent TV, best at that price range. And I'm sorry it was late at night I watched this and English isn't my mother tongue so its not easy to focus on hearing everything they say in the video.
Peter Aitken maybe because you don't play games like the kids here. which is kind of a good thing
I don't see where the motion blur concerns for QLCD comes from. From what I understand from the video, the actual layer that determines light colour is unchanged compared to regular LCD. It's only the backlight that uses QD's instead of another phosphorescent material (carelessly called 'phosphor'), so the 'pixels' function exactly the same? That means same blur as for LCD.
OLED TV's have great color and all that but the burn in problem with them is RIDICULOUS.
Untill * SMELL-O-VISION * comes out, I'm not getting a new tv
Honestly I'd get a QD screen just because the technology is fuggin sweet. Like we live in an age where we can manipulate tiny, low-dimensional quantum systems to display hentai
SAME
I enjoy your presentations and occasionally learn something. Thanx.
For those interested in future tech, search Quantum Dot OLED Hybrid on google. It's cool that people are already experimenting in combining the two together for the best picture possible.
A future AFAP (and, yes, you should call it that) episode should be all about electricity - volts, watts, ohms, amps, etc., specifically how it relates to PC components.
Just saw an article circulating on reddit about how OLED is now cheaper to manufacture than LCD... yay!
Those speech bubbles had me in stitches
I don't think I'd even heard of this before.
Yay for learning completely new stuff here \o/
The editing on this video was top notch, and the content was both interesting and completely new to me. Awesome!
what I would give for an OLED 24" 1440p 144hz monitor...
If a monitor manufacturer comes out with an OLED with a 144hz refresh rate, make sure you give them crap for using a crappy scaler in there because the theoretical refresh rate of OLED is much, much higher than 144hz. ;)
Plasma has proven that 250hz scalers are possible to manufacture, so accept no less than that. :P
***** your soul
MinecraftEpicPlayer gladly.
+Bobby Geiser plasma.. their sub-field specs are the biggest joke in tv marketing ever. 600 hz sub-field = 10 x 60 hz = 60 hz lmao..
no wonder plasma died.
nvidia's gsync module can do real 200 hz on computer monitors.
That mobile strike ad was actually entertaining.
Techquickie Suggestion for future Fast As Possible: Electromagnetic Radiation. Could you also cover Electromagnetic hypersensitivity in the same video?
Story time: I bought the new HTC One M9, great phone, but I have to return it due to constant headaches, nausea and other symptoms. I need more information on Electromagnetic Radiation to understand it better. Please consider it!
Linus, is it possible for you to make a video of a gaming pc for 2015? 1500$ up to 2000$ budget? but not water cooled. I wanna build my own too, and I kinda like to build what parts you will use. I'm planning to use the corsair 780T for my case.
Correctional note, the word phosphor (what you meant in the video) is not interchangeable with the chemical element phosphorus ;)
Mobile device battery saving is the only place i see Quantum dot expanding
I bought a QLED over an OLED because I want to use it as both a PC monitor and a gaming TV, not because it's cheaper. I don't want to worry about burn-in.
Then just get an LCD from any other company for half the price. You just got baited by Samsung's marketing trap.
@@pixels_per_inch No, I bought Samsung because they're a premium brand. I've already replaced it with a C2 now anyway.
Could you do a FAP on what's the difference between CPU's and GPU's and why we cannot simply put two of the same in one system (i.e. motherboard) and do the same.
Tracomaster Linus's parents are visiting, he wouldn't want to get caught in the middle of a FAP
with all the new monitors coming out im going to wait till there is and affordable oled 27in monitor once they come out.
I don't get it. If quantum dots "emit" lights, then why does it need backlighting? Why can't it be like OLED where each pixel emits its own light?
Well, the energy must come from somewhere, they need the backlighting to emit their own light. Quantum dots themselves are very difficult to excite with electricity alone, that's why thy use them incombination with light.
Thanks for the answers, guys. I'm glad to know that there will be quantum dot based OLED.
I've seen a quantum dot OLED Samsung tv in store here.
Best quote so far Linus: "the answer is of course money!"
thx linux.. the white background showed me how dirty my screen actually was :X
spend whole episode cleaning it xD
A big problem with OLED is the lifespan of the blue emitters
Is that argument enough to consider a QLED over the OLED? I mean, it's not like I'd want to spend another 1.5K on a TV in 3-5 years of usage
Well, this is kinda cool. Not sure how it is related to anything quantum related but I'll roll with it.
Topic Suggestion: How to keep Windows running smoothly for more than two months (or is that even possible).
SSD
Keith Strang What are you on? XP? Since Windows 7 Microsoft OS runs smoothly without any problems. CCleaner also cleans a lot of crap for you if you are too lazy to do this yourself.
+Keith Strang Don't be an idiot. Done.
His voice cracked and I thought a puppy was barking
MicroLED is going to be best as it becomes faster to manufacture
Got a 4K Sony Bravia. X8550 I think it was called. Beautiful colors even though its an LCD panel. 100Hz panel and 200Hz motionflow provides good motion. But yeah I think TVs should have motion flow, it starts to look unnatural at 100Hz. But yeah I can even game on this TV, however the latency is more than an average monitor.
Turn off motion flow and the latency will go down. The panel is most likely 60 Hz, frame interpolation is just a technology to blend frames together and strobe the backlight faster. Frame interpolation does little for games beyond create artifacts and add latency.
I know you may think Im wrong but as I said the panel is 100Hz, not 60 like you would assume. Frame interpolation, the motionflow technology in this particular TV, makes it 200Hz. I know how to turn down the refresh rate, but I think it would bring the most natural movement if you could have high refresh rates with motion blur. The real world has an unlimited refresh rate, well a refresh rate the speed of light, but there is motion blur. So it would be quite more realistic.
I personally liked the 'I bought an OLED because its organic' meme. LOL :)
I hoped for smaller pixels... :(
Sony TVs with QDs + Local Dimming are the way to go until blue subpixel lifespans are increased drastically on AMOLED displays
OLED or go home. I want my blacks black.
+ComandanteJ but i bet you also want a insanely expensive tv to last more than 3 years? and don't suffer from blur in fast moving scenes or games.
Well, yeah, endurance of the organic compounds it's a challenge, but if it's solely for cinema, i dont mind a little blurriness, films that use fast panning and stupid parkinson-like filming are not my cup of tea, anyways. ;)
If they can engineer an compound to keep a balanced colour output for around 8 to ten years... we wouldnt need any other screen technology haha.
even if lifetime was increased to 8-10 years, the blur is still a problem for many people and the price too.
by the time oled yield is on par with lcd, they might have fixed lifetime issues and maybe even blur. but i don't think this will happen anytime soon.
i think qled w/ hdr is gonna be big, while oled matures.
Blur is not that bad at all for movies, i've seen quite a lot of OLED displays lastly, and i couldnt see any blur at all with BluRay material. It might be a concern for videogames and such, but i dont NEED top notch video quality for games, so QLED is good enough for that. But cinema? Yeah, please, give me the highest contrast ratios and deepest blacks you can, i dont mind mild blur. Here at home i have a DLP projector, a Plasma, some TN LCD's, an IPS LCD, and a VA LCD. Plasma is the king in image quality, then there is a tie between the DLP and the VA, then IPS (nice colors but terrible bleeding), and of courste, useless TN after that. I lie, old discount CRT would be way ahead, even at 480i. So you can see, blacks are very important for me LOL. Let's hope OLED matures fast.
+ComandanteJ That's racist.
To be honest, this is like John Green of the Electronics community
quantum dot? more dots, more dots, come on more dots. okay stop dot.
"OMG ITS GOT QUANTUM IN THE NAME I NEED 7" lol what every marketing team is like
0:20 "Alalala dings..."
+Techquikie Quantum displays do not need pixel filtering. Please get your facts right!
And now we have Super Amoled
Don't know if it qualifies as a "as fast as possible", but could you do some stuff about gamepads (logitech g13, razer nostomo/orbweaver/tartarus, and/or any others i don't know of)? Really want one but not sure which. Leaning towards the g13 (mostly because its cheaper and layout).
So how do these compare to IPS panels or is this just a newer backlight technology that can be used with any LCD Matrix?
Thumbs Up! Pretty good move from LinusTechTips to Techquickie! Continue the Techwork!
Thanks. Your videos are always really COOOOOOOOL!!!!
When will we see 4k oled screens?
28% of the video is not about the content but rather about advertising o self promotion. Sorry that's a bit much
why is emissive QD displays taking so long?
In love with your show.
No Techquickie on Vessel???
Simple. Vessel SUCKS. There are no media playback/pause/etc hotkeys unlike vlc media player and youtube videos.
The end.
Less trolls on Vessel...
so samsung quantum dot does absolutely nothing in terms of visual performance? why do they mention that their monitors get 125% of sRGB range if quantum dot does nothing? not hating on this vid, just hopefully someone can shed light on this
Can't wait for the iPhone 7 OLED Retina display it's gonna be OP
Because R&D is expensive. This project was backed by Microsoft, they're going to try to market it (at least) even if it is inferior.
F*** it, I'm getting a CDTN Screen.
IEEE Spectrum just posted a quantum dot video that explained this 5x faster and 10x better.
is it just me for isn't interesting that the oled screen was depicted as a curved screen; did he just choose that on random or are the oled curved screens more common place with oled ?
why don''t they just use whit led's? instead of making blue ones, withe? I know there must be a super smart reason but im just stupid so i have to ask
what is the diference between microphone jacks, or sound jacks or jacks that do both
Quantum Dots: not as delicious as Dipping Dots.
There will be a time where there will be something so complicated that a fast as possible video will be like 30mins long.
Linus' face at the end doh 5:31
how does it compare to IPS?
Okay, but my old LCD still perfect.
Pioneer Kuro Gen 9. Infinite blacks! Beats all LCD hands down.
Do you even Schrodinger Equation OLED?
Why can't i find oled monitors on amazon?
So they are worse than OLED but better than IPS/VA/TN and are much more affordable than OLED and dont die as fast like OLED? Nice
Quantum dot isn't its own thing exactly but like enhancing those ips/va/tn monitors, you can see this in the new msi mag monitor with qd which is an ips monitor at its core
Something about sound!
240hz QDLED 16:9 gaming displays?
If it can be better than ips for a fraction of the cost I can see this making its way in every content procducer's arsenal.
This isn't a panel technology, "better than IPS" makes no sense. This is used _in conjunction_ with IPS, VA, and TN panels.
GlenwingKyros Fine, better than ips panels that DON'T USE this technology.
How high is "higher refresh rates" here? 60, 120, 144, 240?
sameidk
Why is the word quantum used? Is it just a marketing tactic or does it actually have something to do with quantum mechanics?
why isnt tv in 60 fps?
What about the combination of OLED + QD + UHD = SUHD?
Wait, OLEDs don't grow in soil? (3:50, intentional)
I knew that word "Quantum" will be next victim of hardware marketing
"OMG they put the word 'Quantum' in it! I need seven!" - Linus Sebastian.
do a video about bus interface, like the 960 with 128 bit