Jimmy Dean Brando LOL! My best guess, and I'm not kidding here, is that she is a living example of NPD, (narcissistic personality disorder- which is actually rare and tough to disgnose because the fuckers have that complex that they're always right and it's other people who need therapy), in a woman, which generally ecpresses differently than a man. They make toxic, abusive, and *horrorific* mothers who tend to produce insecure and severely emotionally traumatized children, especially daughters who they tend to subjugate, control, and compete with in all aspects of life. This bitch has NO real sense of herself, so she fantasizes that she's some kind of walking badass. Um, no. That self-perception infuses their relationships where they suck off the kindness of others only to leave them feeling deflated and bad. They ate master manipulators. I guarantee you she competes with other women constantly in conversations where her opinion must be defaulted to or she'll end the discussion somehow and make the other feel confused. I'm serious when I say that an NPD mother views her children in a highly o objectified way. They are but pawns in the constant chess game of her goals in a day. They tend to find passive-aggressive men who act as enablers to the womans goals, wants, sms needs. They damage people without thought, they have a roach-like survival instinct, they deflect any and all suggestions that they do harm or have. They never accept accountability nor criticism. Listen carefully to how she describes the "backlash" she recieved on Twitter. Listen carefully to her description, much less the need to point it out at all, about her "martial arts class" and her opinion of her involvement in it. She's delusional. It's a warped and unrealistic version of her relationship to it. Notice how she had to insert that *her* "training",(cough, gag, giggle), has made her superior to some amorphous, abstract persona of "faggot bitches" in her diatribe. She'll never be treated for it. But if she has children, I truly pity them. This type of woman is extremely desteuctive to the healthy development of a child's ego and sense of self. And it's a safe bet that at least one of her kids will become a serious substance abuser, any daughters will grow into insecure, neurotic messes with trust issues. Why wouldn't they, when their primary example in life totally destroys their emotional growth? This...person...could easily be the poster child of NPD. Under the hood they are a gigantic mess and disarrayed Id. Under the extremely rare condition that a psychotherapist comes across one, ( because the N P D rejects ANY suggestion that THEY have a serious disorder), it takes *years* to unravel them and realign their ego to a normative state with a moderate sense of self. And NPDs won't do the work. About the only time a shrink comes across an NPD, it's a male in a prison environment. To say they are tough nuts to crack, in terms of a therapeutic breakthrough to their personality, is a monumental understatement.
OKAY! So she's starting off with a flawed premise, marriage equals consent. No it doesn't. It's a communal thing which can bring two people together under love and understanding. The best I can say is that back and forth is non-existant to this woman. I can't put it into words right now, but she is WAY to goddamn extreme in her thinking.
A. When you enlist in the military, there is no clause in the papers that says anyone can have sex with you at any time. B. If you are given an unlawful command by a superior officer, you are REQUIRED to disobey it. C. Your right to consent or not consent to sex cannot be taken away by any institution or law in the United States. This woman is frightening.
Where in marriage vows does it say, "To have and to hold, to love and cherish, AND RAPE, in sickness and in health?" I'm not married, but I've been to a few weddings in my life and I'm pretty sure that's not how it works...
Wow you found a really a strange one. She does the same thing hardcore-SJWs do. Define something in a specific way (in this case what marriage means) then built their whole argumentation on top of that definition. If you, for arguments sake, accept that definition you already lost because the outcome is predetermined. If you don't accept that definition you get into a spiral of arguing over the definition without actually discussing the point (the marital rape thing). This is topped of by her bizarre choice in comparisions. Then she twists these comparison to fit them into here argumentation. I checked one of her other vids and she does it there to. As an example for the devaluation of words she picked "Revolution" missing the point that it always had more meanings than the overthrowing of the government. BTW I really like your content, I bingewatched some of your videos right now and they are fun and on point. You won a new subscriber.
In the Military we constantly receive training on Sexual Assault. Including marital rape. Also you are only obligated to follow "lawful orders" and can even be prosecuted if you do something against the law. Even if you were just "following orders".
@@sliver170 yea, feminists have taken over basically. When I was in men were separated from the women and put into a "learn not to rape class" while women were put into a self-defense class.
@7:36 that instructor probably isn't the best instructor, then. Throughout my whole martial arts career, I have always heard that the instructor should never hurt a student/other instructor. You're supposed to have self control and complete control over your actions during demonstration. If you're sparring, you STILL have to show some form of self control. You learn how to do the patterns/attacks with controlled and deliberate movements so you DON'T hurt the other person. YOU ARE NOT SUPPOSED TO HURT YOUR TRAINING PARTNER, YOU ARE SUPPOSED TO LEARN THE TECHNIQUE AND IMPROVE UPON IT. During sparring, you are SUPPOSED TO GAIN POINTS, NOT HURT THE OTHER PERSON (exceptions being in real-life situations or the UFC, etc.) Even while learning Aikido, you don't just mash pressure points and twist arms like all hell without self control. TL:DR, her martial arts instructor sucks. Don't hurt your training partners, students, or instructors.
There is something wrong at her dojo for sure, we NEVER do that when we train. In fact if someone started acting like they do they would be removed. You are not there to kicked the living shit out of each other.
I'm in Krav Maga & this still applies. Yeah you're taking impact as you hold a bag up against your chest for your partner to punch, or to simulate a groin pluck you slap the partners thigh in the sequence, but there is NO actual hammerfisting people's faces or literally kicking your partner in the balls. If that happens it is an accident & a product of lack of self control that you must work on. I have no idea what her mArTiAl ArTs gym must be like but it must heccin' suck.
Military and martial arts are not similar to marriage. You don't actually fight in these classes, there is sparring, but like you had said there are limits. Its really not that impressive that she is able to handle getting kneed.
Her martial arts class seems dumb as hell. In Krav Maga, pads & tombstones exist for a reason. Her getting kneed story gave her the weirdest high ever.
Ok, so.... In a sub relationship, sure, this is pretty accurate. But you can still ALWAYS withdraw your consent. And comparing marriage to army means she doesn't know wtf marriage is.
With her analogy,she is basically saying "men are women's superiors and she shall follow the orders" The worst part about it is that she is old. How did she survive so long?
I am against feminism but I like to think the rest of us ANTI people know that no means no, and we respect our spouses. This is my view but I know some of us think differently.
I hate to break it to you, bro, but if you’re pro respecting women and are for equality, then you’re a feminist. 🤷🏻♀️ It’s that simple. Congratulations on joining the club. We literally have t-shirts.
@@laurenlavera507 If you advocate for animal rights you're a Nazi. Oh wait, Agreeing on one thing doesn't make you apart of a group that also tangentially agrees with that.
@@dreadpirateroberts4764 And who said ALL Nazis are supporters of animal rights? Who said to be a Nazi you had to be a supporter for animal rights? You're using an extreme and false example. Most people nowadays when they hear the word ' feminist ' their mind usually tends to go towards the very toxic and dumb side of ' feminism ' that we unfortunately have to deal with nowadays and that might be why the first guy might not have wanted to label themselves as one even if they agree with the literal definition of feminism which is the advocacy of women's social and/or legal rights. So while you are right in saying that agreeing with a group's ideal doesn't automatically make you part of a group, I really would suggest using better comparisons when trying to prove an argument.
Marriage doesn’t mean consent, it (among so many other things) means giving respect to your partner. So if one person comes home after a long a tiring day and doesn’t want to have sex, their partner should respect their decision.
I think shes talking about a certain type of marriage, you know where the women only show they're faces or eyes, the people don't drink alcohol and don't eat pig meat.
@@Rashy225 Nooooo.....this lady is....crazy....I know some anti feminist and I can say the ones I know wouldn't agree with the blond idiot in this video.
It is now October 2019 and watching this poor confused creature's subject on how marital rape is not actual rape and her batshit examples and rationalization solidifies how fucking weird the year 2016 was. FYI love your videos JLongbone for keeping it real.
What does the army have to do with marriage?! Marriage isn't an institution, you're ruining the whole "marriage is beautiful" thing. It literally makes marriage this obligated cult that you join instead of sharing a life with another person.
At first I understood why she would think rape in marriage didn't exist (despite how flawed), thinking she might just be naive. Maybe she thinks that all married couples consent and its all sunshine and rainbows or something. THAT IS until the military analogy. Then it just became completely messed up. You can still say 'no'. In fact, you would *expect* from your spouse that you are *allowed* and *would be able* to say 'no'. If you're not allowed to say 'no', and you must do whatever your spouse tells you like a superior officer in the military I would without a doubt consider that rape, and by an extent, an abusive and toxic relationship, *married* or not.
Half the time she looks like she is high and tries to convince you that "Nah immmm I'm im ima fineeee" Also since she has a false premise in all categories (law, ethics, wrong definitions and irrelevant examples) there is no point trying to give her the benefit of the doubt. You are way a better person than her for trying tho. To end this, as the host from last week tonight has said: "sex is like box. If both parties agree to it it's a sport. If one hasn't it's assault"
I miss Judgybitch. Aside from a few extremes she had some really good takes against the crazy women out there. But apparently the threats to her kids were too much and she disappeared.
Under her own logic, her instructor COULD still kick her, because she hasn't voided the original contract she signed. Or conversely, if she believes they consent can be revoked while still under contract, her original argument fals apart.
All people should be recorded 24/7 and evaluated by three panels of experts to determine whether their interactions are consensual or not, as for people like to say these days "for both sexes". It's the only way to be sure.
It's great seeing JLongbone criticize anti SJW as well and instead of the usual "these SJW are crazy" videos. I hope the lady in the video who's being discussed had some self reflection. She has a crazy take on what r*pe is and it is very concerning.
Well, not so long ago a Frenchman was ordered to pay his ex-wife 10,000 EUR (11,157 USD) damages for failing to have sex with her during their marriage. He was fined under article 215 of France’s civil code, which states married couples must agree to a “shared communal life”. The judge ruled that this law implies that “sexual relations must form part of a marriage”. It was in fact the ex-wife who took him to court demanding the money in compensation for “lack of sex over 21 years of marriage”. The ex-husband claimed “tiredness and health problems” had prevented him from performing his "marital duties". But, truth be told, the ex-wife at least had not tried to rape him during those 21 years.
4:41 I'm late to the game but I have to say: There are more ways to withdraw from consent to sex in a marriage: Bullets, Axes, Fists, Passive Aggressive Blackmailing, etc.
I agree there's an expectation that you'll be having sex as a married couple, for sure. I also think there's an expectation that the sex life will continue on into the marriage. But marriages are between two people with sexual autonomy, and I live in a country where an individual's sexual autonomy can't be nullified by a contract; so she loses me when she uses marriage as an excuse for rape. I also live in a country where there's no excuse to stay in a marriage where you're not happy. Sure, some marriages are violent, but some marriages are abusive in other ways where one partner will withhold sexual intimacy when they know the other partner requires it as a part of being in a married couple. This withholding of sexual intimacy can last multiple years. Why I'm not a feminist is because many of them will refuse to admit that kind of spousal abuse because it's not as 'damaging' as physical abuse or rape. But there's a particular type of spousal abuse that happens that feminists refuse to admit exists; when one spouse withholds sexual intimacy from another spouse and drastically changes their behavior to prompt a divorce and get a payout. They ignore this kind of spousal abuse because it's mostly women doing it. In some instances the woman will have a child and use it as a pawn in the abuse as well. It's downright fucking anachronistic today that men's lives can be ruined by women who will use these tactics knowing they can get large sums of money from men while doing absolutely nothing for it. It's the kind of sexism that exists that feminists won't acknowledge and that's one of the reasons I don't call myself a feminist.
I get not feeling on sex sometimes and still on occasion doing it when your partner is down for it, but that is done out of love and thoughtfulness, and absolutely involves consent on all sides. What this woman is talking about is fucking bananas.
This woman is a fucking nightmare. I personally don't like sex all that much. I don't have a desire for it, I don't need it, but I will for my boyfriend. The idea of being forced to have sex with your partner because of something you mutually agreed to with love and trust is... Terrifying. What's worse is my own parents seem to be of the opinion that sex is 100% a necessity for any adult relationship or marriage. "It's just something you HAVE TO do." This woman makes me sick, but your responses and rebuttals are golden. Love your videos.
I can... KIND of understand where she's coming from, to an extent... But then basing the consent around a contract thing... eurg. This does make me wonder, though, what is more traumatic, to be raped by a stranger or by someone who you are/used to be in love with? I always thought the first one would be more horrifying, but the second comes with broken trust and all that.
3:18 "Superiors" is her word... My question is, do her beliefs go both ways? As in, a husband OR wife has the "authority" to demand sex at any time? In that case, she's just deluded. If she thinks that only the man can enforce this, I'd say she's just a hardcore Christian that takes the subservience thing way way too far.
She looks like she has 4 uncontrollable kids called 'Bentlee', 'Maycee', 'Khaitlynne', and 'Leightohnn'
Jimmy Dean Brando LOL!
My best guess, and I'm not kidding here, is that she is a living example of NPD, (narcissistic personality disorder- which is actually rare and tough to disgnose because the fuckers have that complex that they're always right and it's other people who need therapy), in a woman, which generally ecpresses differently than a man. They make toxic, abusive, and *horrorific* mothers who tend to produce insecure and severely emotionally traumatized children, especially daughters who they tend to subjugate, control, and compete with in all aspects of life. This bitch has NO real sense of herself, so she fantasizes that she's some kind of walking badass. Um, no. That self-perception infuses their relationships where they suck off the kindness of others only to leave them feeling deflated and bad. They ate master manipulators. I guarantee you she competes with other women constantly in conversations where her opinion must be defaulted to or she'll end the discussion somehow and make the other feel confused. I'm serious when I say that an NPD mother views her children in a highly o objectified way. They are but pawns in the constant chess game of her goals in a day. They tend to find passive-aggressive men who act as enablers to the womans goals, wants, sms needs. They damage people without thought, they have a roach-like survival instinct, they deflect any and all suggestions that they do harm or have. They never accept accountability nor criticism. Listen carefully to how she describes the "backlash" she recieved on Twitter. Listen carefully to her description, much less the need to point it out at all, about her "martial arts class" and her opinion of her involvement in it. She's delusional. It's a warped and unrealistic version of her relationship to it. Notice how she had to insert that *her* "training",(cough, gag, giggle), has made her superior to some amorphous, abstract persona of "faggot bitches" in her diatribe.
She'll never be treated for it. But if she has children, I truly pity them. This type of woman is extremely desteuctive to the healthy development of a child's ego and sense of self. And it's a safe bet that at least one of her kids will become a serious substance abuser, any daughters will grow into insecure, neurotic messes with trust issues. Why wouldn't they, when their primary example in life totally destroys their emotional growth?
This...person...could easily be the poster child of NPD. Under the hood they are a gigantic mess and disarrayed Id. Under the extremely rare condition that a psychotherapist comes across one, ( because the N P D rejects ANY suggestion that THEY have a serious disorder), it takes *years* to unravel them and realign their ego to a normative state with a moderate sense of self. And NPDs won't do the work. About the only time a shrink comes across an NPD, it's a male in a prison environment. To say they are tough nuts to crack, in terms of a therapeutic breakthrough to their personality, is a monumental understatement.
😂
Lol
@@PhoenixProdLLC With all that you have said, I truly hope she doesn't have any children, and if she does, I wish them the best.
"I'm tired, sweetie, I don't want to have sex right now."
"Yes you do, WE'RE MARRIED!"
I don't want to have to get a divorce to just say no to sex because its been a long day.
This woman is crazy
*BANG* Consider that a divorce.
“Sorry bro, you enlisted in this and I rank higher than you. Get the dragon dildo.”
Lol the Bug slayer . . . Total Recall?
And what does she think of couples that go into marriage in mutual agreement of abstinence?
Can't tell what's worse: if she's serious or trying to be edgy.
oh, she's serious 🤦
same
@@ruffalo1643
I hope she had self reflection since then.
@@ChadetteIsDead
She sounded like she was trolling.
Due to her other videos being sadly similar, she seems to be serious.
OKAY! So she's starting off with a flawed premise, marriage equals consent. No it doesn't. It's a communal thing which can bring two people together under love and understanding. The best I can say is that back and forth is non-existant to this woman. I can't put it into words right now, but she is WAY to goddamn extreme in her thinking.
My response to this lady? Husband being a little unavailable huh?
Her version of logic hurts my brain 😒
It hurt everybody's brains in 30-miles radius.
A. When you enlist in the military, there is no clause in the papers that says anyone can have sex with you at any time.
B. If you are given an unlawful command by a superior officer, you are REQUIRED to disobey it.
C. Your right to consent or not consent to sex cannot be taken away by any institution or law in the United States.
This woman is frightening.
I hope the woman in the video had some self reflection since this video has been made.
I would hate to see this woman's marriage vows.
Had a friend who wanted to have daily sex as obligatory in his wedding vows. Thankfully that marriage never happened.
@@taffwob That's the kind of thing that sounds great when you're twenty, but by the time you're around twenty-five just sounds tedious.
I feel like she was one of those moms who was in a 50 shades of grey book clubs
Yikes 😬
Where in marriage vows does it say, "To have and to hold, to love and cherish, AND RAPE, in sickness and in health?"
I'm not married, but I've been to a few weddings in my life and I'm pretty sure that's not how it works...
Agreed lol.
Wow you found a really a strange one. She does the same thing hardcore-SJWs do. Define something in a specific way (in this case what marriage means) then built their whole argumentation on top of that definition. If you, for arguments sake, accept that definition you already lost because the outcome is predetermined. If you don't accept that definition you get into a spiral of arguing over the definition without actually discussing the point (the marital rape thing). This is topped of by her bizarre choice in comparisions. Then she twists these comparison to fit them into here argumentation. I checked one of her other vids and she does it there to. As an example for the devaluation of words she picked "Revolution" missing the point that it always had more meanings than the overthrowing of the government.
BTW I really like your content, I bingewatched some of your videos right now and they are fun and on point. You won a new subscriber.
*_STEEEEEEERNN!_*
In the Military we constantly receive training on Sexual Assault. Including marital rape. Also you are only obligated to follow "lawful orders" and can even be prosecuted if you do something against the law. Even if you were just "following orders".
@@sliver170 "Social experiment" pretty well describes what they're doing with the military.
People's feelings matter more than combat effectiveness.
@@sliver170 yea, feminists have taken over basically. When I was in men were separated from the women and put into a "learn not to rape class" while women were put into a self-defense class.
I don't remember there being any kind of clause concerning sexual consent in any marriage contract.
@7:36 that instructor probably isn't the best instructor, then.
Throughout my whole martial arts career, I have always heard that the instructor should never hurt a student/other instructor. You're supposed to have self control and complete control over your actions during demonstration. If you're sparring, you STILL have to show some form of self control.
You learn how to do the patterns/attacks with controlled and deliberate movements so you DON'T hurt the other person. YOU ARE NOT SUPPOSED TO HURT YOUR TRAINING PARTNER, YOU ARE SUPPOSED TO LEARN THE TECHNIQUE AND IMPROVE UPON IT.
During sparring, you are SUPPOSED TO GAIN POINTS, NOT HURT THE OTHER PERSON (exceptions being in real-life situations or the UFC, etc.)
Even while learning Aikido, you don't just mash pressure points and twist arms like all hell without self control.
TL:DR, her martial arts instructor sucks. Don't hurt your training partners, students, or instructors.
There is something wrong at her dojo for sure, we NEVER do that when we train. In fact if someone started acting like they do they would be removed. You are not there to kicked the living shit out of each other.
I'm in Krav Maga & this still applies. Yeah you're taking impact as you hold a bag up against your chest for your partner to punch, or to simulate a groin pluck you slap the partners thigh in the sequence, but there is NO actual hammerfisting people's faces or literally kicking your partner in the balls. If that happens it is an accident & a product of lack of self control that you must work on. I have no idea what her mArTiAl ArTs gym must be like but it must heccin' suck.
This is a stepford wife, you have found a stepford wife. They actually exist.
How dare you the stepFord wives had actual standards
I am sure that those 12 year old brides would disagree....
Military and martial arts are not similar to marriage. You don't actually fight in these classes, there is sparring, but like you had said there are limits. Its really not that impressive that she is able to handle getting kneed.
Im actually curious where her gym is at.
Her martial arts class seems dumb as hell. In Krav Maga, pads & tombstones exist for a reason. Her getting kneed story gave her the weirdest high ever.
This post needs one more like and no more after that. It must be perfect
Ok, so.... In a sub relationship, sure, this is pretty accurate. But you can still ALWAYS withdraw your consent.
And comparing marriage to army means she doesn't know wtf marriage is.
With her analogy,she is basically saying "men are women's superiors and she shall follow the orders"
The worst part about it is that she is old. How did she survive so long?
There’s a “Love, laugh” sticker on her wall. Her argument is invalid.
I am against feminism but I like to think the rest of us ANTI people know that no means no, and we respect our spouses. This is my view but I know some of us think differently.
Yeah i agree with you, even the right has its fair share of nutjobs.
I hate to break it to you, bro, but if you’re pro respecting women and are for equality, then you’re a feminist. 🤷🏻♀️ It’s that simple. Congratulations on joining the club. We literally have t-shirts.
@@laurenlavera507 If you advocate for animal rights you're a Nazi.
Oh wait, Agreeing on one thing doesn't make you apart of a group that also tangentially agrees with that.
Lauren LaVera thats not what feminism is
@@dreadpirateroberts4764 And who said ALL Nazis are supporters of animal rights? Who said to be a Nazi you had to be a supporter for animal rights? You're using an extreme and false example.
Most people nowadays when they hear the word ' feminist ' their mind usually tends to go towards the very toxic and dumb side of ' feminism ' that we unfortunately have to deal with nowadays and that might be why the first guy might not have wanted to label themselves as one even if they agree with the literal definition of feminism which is the advocacy of women's social and/or legal rights. So while you are right in saying that agreeing with a group's ideal doesn't automatically make you part of a group, I really would suggest using better comparisons when trying to prove an argument.
Maybe she's Stockholmed into believing this
“Jesus LORD, keep me close to the CROSS!”-Jlongbone
Or she lives in a perfect world where marriage is always perfect and we are the crazy ones
With that lady's comprehension problems, she'd make a great anti-vaxxer.
I feel like there could be a blonde joke in there somewhere…
Marriage doesn’t mean consent, it (among so many other things) means giving respect to your partner. So if one person comes home after a long a tiring day and doesn’t want to have sex, their partner should respect their decision.
If marriage is about taking orders and respect for authority, wouldn't divorce be impossible?
I think shes talking about a certain type of marriage, you know where the women only show they're faces or eyes, the people don't drink alcohol and don't eat pig meat.
Blackknight Withheart ..LMAOOOOO
yikes
LMFAO certainly sounds that way XD
😂😂😂😂 even in the military you can refuse orders if they are illegal (insert quadruple facepalm)💯
I love you!!! Thank you lately these anti feminist are *JUST* as bad! I'm like what kinda of bull shiiit...has everyone lost their damn minds?!
yourjoking Right of course you’d say that.
@@Rashy225 Nooooo.....this lady is....crazy....I know some anti feminist and I can say the ones I know wouldn't agree with the blond idiot in this video.
Exactly!
Barely 15 seconds in and already you've made me spill water laughing. Bravo JLong
Husband: What's wrong sweetie?
Wife: I'm sad my dad died
Husband: ...take off your clothes
Wtf!?
It is now October 2019 and watching this poor confused creature's subject on how marital rape is not actual rape and her batshit examples and rationalization solidifies how fucking weird the year 2016 was. FYI love your videos JLongbone for keeping it real.
oh my lawd she has a *Live Laugh Love* sign in the background too
What does the army have to do with marriage?! Marriage isn't an institution, you're ruining the whole "marriage is beautiful" thing.
It literally makes marriage this obligated cult that you join instead of sharing a life with another person.
the sign in the back- THE SIGN IN THE BACK
It explains A LOT.
That military analogy is truly scary.
Oh shoot she is actually defending something seriously that I defend jokingly around the guys.
I'm afraid of this woman. 😓
Me too
Jlongbone needs an award for suffering through this shit with us 🏆🎖🥉🥈🥇🏅🏆🎖
At first I understood why she would think rape in marriage didn't exist (despite how flawed), thinking she might just be naive. Maybe she thinks that all married couples consent and its all sunshine and rainbows or something. THAT IS until the military analogy. Then it just became completely messed up. You can still say 'no'. In fact, you would *expect* from your spouse that you are *allowed* and *would be able* to say 'no'. If you're not allowed to say 'no', and you must do whatever your spouse tells you like a superior officer in the military I would without a doubt consider that rape, and by an extent, an abusive and toxic relationship, *married* or not.
Half the time she looks like she is high and tries to convince you that "Nah immmm I'm im ima fineeee"
Also since she has a false premise in all categories (law, ethics, wrong definitions and irrelevant examples) there is no point trying to give her the benefit of the doubt. You are way a better person than her for trying tho.
To end this, as the host from last week tonight has said: "sex is like box. If both parties agree to it it's a sport. If one hasn't it's assault"
I'm late, but I feel like she's projecting her experiences. 😥😥
This woman is like a parody but scary because she's real, I NEED AN ADULT
I miss Judgybitch. Aside from a few extremes she had some really good takes against the crazy women out there. But apparently the threats to her kids were too much and she disappeared.
weather she's trolling or being serious I wish too cry for humanity now
You find one crazy and the opposing crazies will leech onto it.
How does someone even has this perception of marriage in this day and age? And that creepy smile while she explains herself....
Great Sherlock clip usage 😂 "NOoooOOOO ITS NOOoOOOOOOT"
Under her own logic, her instructor COULD still kick her, because she hasn't voided the original contract she signed. Or conversely, if she believes they consent can be revoked while still under contract, her original argument fals apart.
This video was very amusing. Talk about serious lack of self confidence and active brain cells.
Goddamn I don't think I've ever seen so many feelings simultaneously repressed
“Think of marriage like the military”
she sounds like she's drunk, either that or she hasn't slept in 2 days.
I used to love Janet Bloomfield. Now I can't stand her because she's turning into a right-ring SJW.
This lady sounds crazy!! What is going on in her marriage?
Husband: Hay I don't feel good today.
Wife: Ha ha, I'm ignoring that.
This woman thinks that situation is acceptable.
As a son of a mother who was broken by marital raip, that video of hers is insulting.
scorpion's wife: I don't want to tonight and my lips are still sore..
Scorpion: Get Over Here!
20 minutes later.
FINISH HIM!!!
Ha
Marriage is not signing a waiver to being assaulted.
"Marriage is consent."
Ah, of course. Because it's not like forced or arranged marriages are a thing.
All people should be recorded 24/7 and evaluated by three panels of experts to determine whether their interactions are consensual or not, as for people like to say these days "for both sexes". It's the only way to be sure.
13:20
Anti-SJW DESTROYS feminist with FACTS and LOGIC (volume 123746)
I like you so much!
I get mad at these motherfkers and then I calm down listening to you. Feels good
Wow... marriage sounds freakin' scary.
Okay someone needs to help this woman.
It's great seeing JLongbone criticize anti SJW as well and instead of the usual "these SJW are crazy" videos.
I hope the lady in the video who's being discussed had some self reflection.
She has a crazy take on what r*pe is and it is very concerning.
Well, not so long ago a Frenchman was ordered to pay his ex-wife 10,000 EUR (11,157 USD) damages for failing to have sex with her during their marriage. He was fined under article 215 of France’s civil code, which states married couples must agree to a “shared communal life”. The judge ruled that this law implies that “sexual relations must form part of a marriage”. It was in fact the ex-wife who took him to court demanding the money in compensation for “lack of sex over 21 years of marriage”. The ex-husband claimed “tiredness and health problems” had prevented him from performing his "marital duties".
But, truth be told, the ex-wife at least had not tried to rape him during those 21 years.
If you cannot say “no”, then your “yes” is not consent.
4:41 I'm late to the game but I have to say: There are more ways to withdraw from consent to sex in a marriage: Bullets, Axes, Fists, Passive Aggressive Blackmailing, etc.
_Marriage equals consent_
*IQ Level 10000*
These videos always make my day! Keep up the funnies!
My brain listening to all that :🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯
I see Karen found a copy of the Qur'ran. Good for her.
I agree there's an expectation that you'll be having sex as a married couple, for sure. I also think there's an expectation that the sex life will continue on into the marriage. But marriages are between two people with sexual autonomy, and I live in a country where an individual's sexual autonomy can't be nullified by a contract; so she loses me when she uses marriage as an excuse for rape.
I also live in a country where there's no excuse to stay in a marriage where you're not happy. Sure, some marriages are violent, but some marriages are abusive in other ways where one partner will withhold sexual intimacy when they know the other partner requires it as a part of being in a married couple. This withholding of sexual intimacy can last multiple years. Why I'm not a feminist is because many of them will refuse to admit that kind of spousal abuse because it's not as 'damaging' as physical abuse or rape. But there's a particular type of spousal abuse that happens that feminists refuse to admit exists; when one spouse withholds sexual intimacy from another spouse and drastically changes their behavior to prompt a divorce and get a payout. They ignore this kind of spousal abuse because it's mostly women doing it. In some instances the woman will have a child and use it as a pawn in the abuse as well. It's downright fucking anachronistic today that men's lives can be ruined by women who will use these tactics knowing they can get large sums of money from men while doing absolutely nothing for it. It's the kind of sexism that exists that feminists won't acknowledge and that's one of the reasons I don't call myself a feminist.
I get not feeling on sex sometimes and still on occasion doing it when your partner is down for it, but that is done out of love and thoughtfulness, and absolutely involves consent on all sides. What this woman is talking about is fucking bananas.
Maaaaan this video is old as shit but it still has insane powers in pissing me off.
Me too, it makes so angry.
I wonder if she still has that coffee maker in the background or went for the espresso machine? Either would be better than her video.
I wanna hear her thought process for coming to this conclusion, and an example from when she has had to live by this principle herself
Were you been girl. You're incredible. Thank you.
This woman is a fucking nightmare. I personally don't like sex all that much. I don't have a desire for it, I don't need it, but I will for my boyfriend. The idea of being forced to have sex with your partner because of something you mutually agreed to with love and trust is... Terrifying. What's worse is my own parents seem to be of the opinion that sex is 100% a necessity for any adult relationship or marriage. "It's just something you HAVE TO do."
This woman makes me sick, but your responses and rebuttals are golden. Love your videos.
Objectively speaking, she sounds really really nervous talking about this.
I can't tell if she's serious, and that's very concerning.
I wonder if she's ever said no to her husband.
You can't murder your spouse, it is just assisted suicide.
The worst thing is that she thinks she's very smart.
Ah yes, because a piece of paper given to you by the government means consent 24/7
The grass is red _____!!!! Laughing the freak out loud..
Thankfully, the law both supercedes and outrightly contradicts her opinion. End of argument.
I guess abuse can’t exist within a marriage either; after all you have consented to what happens within the marriage.
Wait so marriage is the legalization of sex on demand without consent oh that's what that is.
Ahh, Marriage: The Ferengi Way.
I see.
SHE FUCKING WOULD HAVE A GAWTDAMN "Live Laugh Love" WALL DECORATION
Wow. Compares marriage to military service... beautiful. Should be conducting marriage ceremonies.
I can't help but wonder if this is Dedee Pfeiffer. If not, it's one hell of a resemblance.
I can... KIND of understand where she's coming from, to an extent... But then basing the consent around a contract thing... eurg.
This does make me wonder, though, what is more traumatic, to be raped by a stranger or by someone who you are/used to be in love with? I always thought the first one would be more horrifying, but the second comes with broken trust and all that.
I have a need to get extremely drunk.
3:18 "Superiors" is her word... My question is, do her beliefs go both ways? As in, a husband OR wife has the "authority" to demand sex at any time? In that case, she's just deluded. If she thinks that only the man can enforce this, I'd say she's just a hardcore Christian that takes the subservience thing way way too far.
Is this how she justifies her own husband mistreating her 👀
Does she also think 🤔 if there is an abuse within a marriage that also a consent 🙃