How does Random Effects work?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 3 жов 2013
  • This video explains the mechanism through which Random Effects estimators work, and indicates how it collapses to Pooled OLS and Fixed Effects under certain assumptions.
    Check out oxbridge-tutor.co.uk/undergrad... for course materials, and information regarding updates on each of the courses. Check out ben-lambert.com/econometrics-... for course materials, and information regarding updates on each of the courses. Quite excitingly (for me at least), I am about to publish a whole series of new videos on Bayesian statistics on youtube. See here for information: ben-lambert.com/bayesian/ Accompanying this series, there will be a book: www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/1...
  • Навчання та стиль

КОМЕНТАРІ • 29

  • @bishopseol6992
    @bishopseol6992 Рік тому +2

    This video made me understand the relationship between FE, RE and OLS. Awesome video

  • @loveangela31
    @loveangela31 9 років тому +1

    Thanks, Ben. This series of video has helped me a lot with econometrics. Highly appreciated!

  • @leokrak71042
    @leokrak71042 4 роки тому +2

    Ben I'm gonna be honest, you're the boss of econometrics

  • @achudakhinkudachin2048
    @achudakhinkudachin2048 4 роки тому

    Very good series of panel regression. Ben made the subject very clear! Thank you!

  • @tifius
    @tifius 8 років тому +1

    Great video mate, I've been struggling with RE but this makes a lot of sense.

  • @Alphaa254
    @Alphaa254 6 років тому

    Great content! all questions answered. Thank you

  • @screenager2009
    @screenager2009 3 роки тому

    Thank you for making these videos! They are really helpful.

  • @sydulkarim9786
    @sydulkarim9786 6 років тому

    Really helps a lot. Great speaker!

  • @olofreichenberg6885
    @olofreichenberg6885 8 років тому +1

    Great explanation!

  • @tusvanlacika1157
    @tusvanlacika1157 2 роки тому

    Incredibly valuable videos, thank you

  • @popeye4660
    @popeye4660 4 роки тому

    This is a great explanation, thank you

  • @maggiewu9946
    @maggiewu9946 3 роки тому

    very explanatory!!! the video is AWESOME !!!

  • @seyoonlee2315
    @seyoonlee2315 5 років тому

    Very clear teaching!

  • @berke-ozgen
    @berke-ozgen 2 роки тому

    Very straight forward. Thank you

  • @danielecatapano6229
    @danielecatapano6229 3 роки тому

    Great explanation thank you!

  • @Eijgey
    @Eijgey 2 роки тому

    This guy is an absolute legend

  • @sissilamia3703
    @sissilamia3703 8 років тому +3

    how can we calculate variance of "u" and variance of "alpha", in orher words how can we calculate the "Ui" and "ALPHAit)

  • @carolineliu2986
    @carolineliu2986 3 роки тому

    Thank you so muh!

  • @chrislam1341
    @chrislam1341 10 років тому +2

    How did you got that lambda equation?_?

    • @ruchikaagarwal5591
      @ruchikaagarwal5591 5 років тому +1

      You can remodel the original equation by taking avgs. of the variables. Then multiply this eqn. by lambda . Then subtract this new equation from the original one.

  • @rareclassicmovies6429
    @rareclassicmovies6429 10 років тому

    in the case that RE=FE, why we just assume that T*Sigma(alpha) is equal to infinity and we don't assume that sigma(u) can be equal to zero? thanks

    • @robenwu620
      @robenwu620 7 років тому +2

      The sigma(u) term indicates the idiosyncratic error, which means that it changes both over time and individual, if this term equals to zero, why we need the control variables? I am not sure whether my answer is right. This is just my consideration.

  • @christepherclaxton665
    @christepherclaxton665 5 років тому

    fantastic

  • @ruchikaagarwal5591
    @ruchikaagarwal5591 5 років тому

    Something that I'd like to add. Sigma square a =0 does not necessarily mean that a is not present.we can delete it. It just means that variance of a across individuals is zero. There is no individual specific effect. In which case we can just use a simple OLS model .a plays no role in analysis.

    • @berke-ozgen
      @berke-ozgen 2 роки тому

      Great addition. Made it easier to understand.

  • @Alvinho0220124
    @Alvinho0220124 9 років тому

    Who is T?

  • @aminjahangard4025
    @aminjahangard4025 6 місяців тому

    cool

  • @glaswasser
    @glaswasser 2 роки тому

    I'd prefer a less mathematical explanation :-/