Terrence Howard Refuted By Neil deGrasse Tyson - Luke Reacts
Вставка
- Опубліковано 23 чер 2024
- 👉🏼 LINKS: linktr.ee/lukestephens 👈🏼
--
Luke Stephens is a Content-Creator and Streamer that co-streams on UA-cam and Twitch. This channel has Live Stream clips and highlights in addition to the streams themselves. Check out Luke's main channel & other content by going to: linktr.ee/lukestephens !!
StarTalk's Original Video: • My Response to Terrenc...
--------------------------------------------------------------------
╔═╦╗╔╦╗╔═╦═╦╦╦╦╗╔═╗
║╚╣║║║╚╣╚╣╔╣╔╣║╚╣═╣
╠╗║╚╝║║╠╗║╚╣║║║║║═╣
╚═╩══╩═╩═╩═╩╝╚╩═╩═╝
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe and I'll be your bestest friend!
#gaming #LukeStephens #ps5 #xbox - Розваги
Now that the internet exists the crazy people can meet up and feel like their ideas are true when they are not
Echo Chambers were originally designed by Social Media networks like Facebook, literally hardcoded, to create higher retention rates.. their entire goal at one point was just get people to stay on the site as long as possible at any cost.. probably still is, but new hot 'It' social networks pop up every few years.. we're about due for TikToks replacement..
confirmation bias is a killer of common sense in these cases
@@StayFractalesquei low key kinda blame facebook for a lot of this culture war bullshit. they made our society so tribal with these echo chambers. i know facebook isnt the only one to do it, but they did set the trend in a lot of ways so i still put some blame on them
It's also easier than ever to refuse bad ideas thanks to the internet, which makes it even more strange that there's this much willful ignorance.
@@StayFractalesque I think they always existed. If you think about it, a room full of stupid people with the same ideas will start to reinforce their beliefs in those ideas. I bet that goes back to the start of civilization
People can fabricate how 1x1= 2 all they want. But once Terrence talks about how he can remember being in the womb, saw his hand, in the womb and called his hand friend. Then says he proved it by shining a light on his pregnant wife's belly and says that he can get his unborn child to do math with a flash light on her belly... okay something is not right up there.
@@themadgamer4571 lol no way he said that.. is it on his ep with Joe Rogan? I see he just got a new one too.
Neil was more charitable than I would have been.
Neil once lost a scientific argument on Twitter with Steak-ums.
I'm going to withhold judgment until the meat sheets tell me what to think.
Terrance Howard is a perfect example of why anti-establishment sentiment has gone way too far. People will defend him just because he disagrees with the "scientific establishment."
Meanwhile Neil out here parroting PRO establisment propaganda and parroting LGBT propaganda.
There’s nothing wrong with anti-establishment sentiment, but when one throws out standard knowledge and scientific method, that’s some dangerous terrain
@@marvinthemartian6788 there absolutely IS something wrong with anti-establishment sentiment. It leads people to adopting criticisms that are often times unfounded, or abject lies because they are not informed critics of any sort of establishment. It's the type of blanket blind criticism that is completely unconstructive, simplistic, and destructive.
Be critical of power structures, but to be anti-power structures is to be a fool, just like Terrance.
People are confident in their ignorance…..it is frustrating.
yeah i was a lot like this when i was younger, ah, still am to a degree, i try not to fall in that route but it happens sometimes.
We are on the verge of a new dark ages.
I feel the frustration
Peer review is so important SO SO IMPORTANT.
Neil Degrasse v Terrance Ongrass
wait until he finds out about how 1.9+1.9 is greater than 1.9x1.9... and same for every number below it until 0. He didnt even say integer.
Isnt there like a this one super basic addiction, subtraction, division, multiplication problem, where you take 4 numbers, they add up to 50, but when you reverse the equation, you dont get back down to zero, you get 1.. something like that..
Only if you do it wrong
Except Terry would be asking about sqrt(1.9)+sqrt(1.9), which absolutely is less than 1.9². The range of values disproving Terry's assertion is between 0 and the cube root of four.
"I could not follow the reasoning" - I'm worried about this comment for TH followers, they'll think he was too smart for NDT.
What’s sad is that exactly what they are going to say too 😂😂
Neil couldn't follow it because it's complete nonsense, he's just too nice to say that. As Professor Dave said, it's like I told you that you need six hammer to ice cream eleven monkey dizzy.
@@SonicFrake yeah that video is so good 😂 Dave just cooks him
Joe Rogan says he's a genius
It may sound crazy because people can’t understand him. So it’s up to him to prove his idea in a useful way.
It’s ridiculous how people have made Terrence Howard’s idiotic misinterpretation of math about politics… Americans really find a way to make everything political. Reminder, this is the guy who quit iron man because marvel was to pay Robert Downey jr, the actor portraying the main character, more money than him. He’s not and he’s never been the sharpest tool in the shed.
To anyone who thinks 1*1=2, let me explain it to you like your teacher was supposed to do when you were 4. If you have 1 pile with 1 thing in it, how many things do you have? 1. So 1*1=1
Like Terrence... Show me what you talking about. Do it.
@@blackrahk2037 you want me to show you how 1*1=1?
Ok, simple, so if you put 1 thing on the table, you have 1 pile containing 1 thing. How many total things do you have?
Let me make it even easier, everyone understand money, you have a pile of money containing a single dollar bill, how much money do you have? $1.
Therefore, 1*1=1, not 2.
@@alexanderg.i1991 oh no bro. I agree with you. Well not just you basic math as well. I was talking to Terrence. ✌️ And 💕
@@blackrahk2037 oh, my bad lol. I misunderstood your message.
People always want to disprove the established norms to the point where now we see people saying 1*1=2
@@alexanderg.i1991what a lovely refreshing exchange between you and the other person.
Even when you thought they were being mean you took time to explain what you meant.
Have a great day 😊
Terrance wanted 15m to Downeys 2m for the sequel.. Downey made 1m and Terrance made 10m in the first film.. instead, they fired Terrance, ended up giving Downey 10m, and Downey ended up cutting his own salary to help pay for other talent and crew, like giving Mickey Rourke 2m instead of just 500k that the producers wanted to give him..
They should have offered him 10 million times zero.
@@monster762 ..im almost certain, that over time, RDJjr got there.. if we could ask him, im sure he would say hes been compensated to his satisfaction..
@@StayFractalesque yeah, but they should offer Terrence 10 million (or 15 million, or 100 million) times zero, then see if he still believes 1 times zero equals 1.
Dunning-kruger shows how confident a random person at a given experience level is likely to be. It does not show an individual's confidence as the gain experience. There's was another experiment they did that did for an individual's experience and it had the early bump in confidence but much less dramatic.
Ive always seen it as a generalization of the stupidity of the ignorant, just expressed on a graph.. doesnt make it, like, mathematically provable, its just the reality of mastering any subject..
@@StayFractalesque
You should be a bit more humble.
All of us have strengths and weaknesses.
Stupidity and ignorance are very different concepts and you're talking down to these people, which you shouldn't. Neil didn't.
I can see one of your weaknesses is your writing.
My grammar, spelling and general English knowledge is terrible as well and it is my first language, but I'm not talking down to people.
Just on the side, not everything is mathematically provable. Nothing about human psychology is mathematically provable. Not all graphs are used mathematically, sometimes they are used to convey an idea.
Neil Degrasse Tyson seems like a smart guy.
Not gonna lie, Neil cooked him in the most respectful way I've ever seen.
What I don't understand is why anyone is giving Howard a second of attention. His assertions are so absurd that I'm astounded anyone, much less someone like Neil deGrasse Tyson, would take them seriously. I think Terence Howard has what I like to call "Kanye Syndrome". He's like a teenager who thinks he's smarter than everyone else while else looks at him and knows he's a dumbass.
I think the term is “lack of whole object relations” which is tied to a “lack of object constancy.” He thinks in terms of “all good” or “all bad” when it comes to himself, others and institutions. Regular people that don’t lack OC can see themselves and others as an integrated whole with both positive and negative attributes. Terrence is unable to make appropriate predictions about others or himself because of the way he splits his negative attributes away from her identity (and subsequently how he projects negative or positive attributes onto others), usually caused by the immense emotional sting of shame. So the adaption he and other narcissists develop is essentially a feedback loop that avoids self shame. Primary reason why he doesn’t need evidence because evidence in many cases is “all bad” and would lead to an enormous amount of shame for Terrence. This also goes into why narcissists avoid empathy, if they were ever able to empathize with someone who sees a flaw in them they’d self destruct. You can see it in his Oxford speech when several of the students challenge him on his ideas, he quickly changes the subject or snaps (due object constancy), or uses his patents and weirdly constructed drone device as evidence, though 1x1=2 couldn’t have possibly been used in the formation of that drone.
Neil had a perfect response, I haven't seen anyone put up a video where they didn't sound like some condescending asshole
Terrance try to scam Uganda... so, i think is ok to be condescending to this asshole.
Oh I totally agree he was brilliant, NDT laid out a perfect example of how to remain objective and firm but in a kind manner that is not going to leave someone with a very negative experience when it comes to the scientific method.
I'm sure he's dealt with many people like this before, people who thought they're right, but turns out they were misguided. So it's best to guide them back on track, rather than be dismissive and make them more delusional in their own thoughts.
Howard is way too delusional though.
People are condescending because Terrence is assuming his pseudo-science is more authentic than generations on generations of educated peoples' hard work lol imagine walking into a restaurant and telling the Chef he's cooking wrong when your cooking experience is microwaving popcorn
Professor Dave explains entered the chat
Terrence has a 160 page document on his website. There isn’t leaps of logic to reach conclusions, there’s disconnected flights of fancy
I remember wanting Terrance Howard to return for Iron Man 2 as War Machine. Honestly, now I'm glad he got rejected
It's pretty easy... if science as we understand it doesn't work, then all our technological accomplishments either don't work as they should or just work by accident.
So let him build a car using his idea of science and maths and let's see if anyone wants to take a ride.
This is probably the best rebuttal to someone like Terrance lol. I have a friend that reads random conspiracy theories online like every other week and I have to reel him back in 😂
I don't follow Joe Rogan at all, but after all of this, I think he's dumber than Terrence Howard
Rogan is the guy that hosted a game show of people eating cow testicles. He’s just an empty vessel that will say anything as long as he thinks there’s an audience that wants to hear it.
It's not that he is dumb, just that he isn't going to oppose his guest when he doesn't have an understanding of what exactly Terrance was wrong about. One thing I always thought about Joe Rogan is that he is willing to hear anything out and is willing to learn and be wrong. He did say that he thought Terrance Howard should send his findings to a lot of different mathematicians and scientists and then see what they all say about it.
Joe Rogan is a moron according to _Joe Rogan_
@@anthonyernst999 lol. No. Joe is willing to let anyone on his show he thinks will improve the buzz, profile, and sensationalism of his show, no matter how deranged. This is the guy that hosted fear factor. Status and money are the only two things operating his compass.
@@Noodles1771 We said the same thing only you're a pessimist and I'm not
He made Neil out to be an asshole to people who believed Terrance Howards math.
Not only is Terrance Howard's paper wrong about 1*1=2, his paper subtly insinuates that prime numbers don't exist meaning i cant multiply a number "A" *1 and get the number "A" back. His idea doesnt just mess with multiplication but his idea rejects prime numbers and subsequently the field of cryptography, credit card encryption, VPNs etc. i could go on. He also never acknowledges the case of -1. His paper is so bad on so many levels.
Indeed. I was wondering about what he thinks about primes.
But then... I don't think he "thinks" too much at all about that whole stuff. One of the problems that I found "so bad" in his paper is his inconsistency. He can't follow through with his ideas, contradicts himself, doesn't consider consequences, never tries to build a consistent system. He declares all of maths to be "a lie"... but doesn't have anything to offer as a replacement, except fancy words.
Considering that his whole approach is less based on mathematics than on attitude, I don't think any objection might be enough to convince _him_ that he isn't the most genial genius and sole saviour of civilization... but perhaps it might get to reconsider some of those who think he's right, just because he says others are wrong.
It was a very considerate response from Neil.
If you are interested, "Metatron" talks more about how linguistics can explain the issues with the notions presented by Terence, and why he thinks Terence says what he said.
The video is more interesting that it sounds ar first, explaining the foundations of conspiracy theory and stuff.
Neil DeGrasse Tyson delivering the most polite and eloquent clapback of all times
Neil's reply video was beautiful tbh
alot of the world's problems would be solved if we could all speak, discuss and listen like Neil
Couldn’t disagree more. We need to be blunt and stop treating morons with respect.
@@maxwell8758 ?
Agreed 👍 i didn’t expect that for sure
You obviously haven't seen alot of Tyson's "peaceful logical discussions" recently. Dude flips out when hes called out.
Straight lies 😂😂@@via_negativa6183
5 minutes in and Luke already pulled out ms paint this is a perfect video
Terrence Howard Refuted? Yeah, no shit!
But you can’t understand how a genius thinks, at a higher level than you. Howard figured these things out in the womb. Your feeble mind can’t compare.
I figured it out in my dad's balls. 1x1 = 2 balls. Bisexual wave frequency.
lol, satire at it's finest!
@@lukaszzylik4437Gotta love Bisexual waves😂😂
In all sincerity: that's why I think (good) teachers are better then "geniuses".
Someone might be a genius; their thoughts on a higher level than yours; so much higher than your feeble mind can't fathom them.
But if you already admitted that you don't understand them... how could you evaluate if they reakky are a genius... or if they are just bullshitting you?
A good teacher on the other hand can _get you to understand..._
To be fair he actually played in some classic movies. Crash, prisoners, the best man, get rich and die trying, iron man, and hustle & flow
You expect Luke to know about Hustle & Flow? 😂
@@SolidSnake240 absolutely not 😂
As a historian I meet armchair historians a lot that think they have understood X source in a way that no other historian has and its a conspiracy against them that no one will listen.
I used to try explain that perhaps they have misunderstood the source or don't understand the context around it. But now I just nod and smile. I'm just tired of meeting people that don't bother to go through the methodical process of research but instead read one thing and draw a multitude of false conclusions. I've met amature historians that are fantastic and their work is groundbreaking but they are few and far between these days.
Really enjoying your content Luke. I enjoy hearing your critiques, but I also would love to see more random stuff like this
Terrance Howard is trolling everyone. He's trying to stay relevant in the public's eye.
How Neil was acting is how teachers should act when a child is misguided
Howard quoting himself is pure gold : i´m right because i say so...
It's a misguided thought that slaves built the pyramids when in fact they were well paid labourers and architects around each pyramid was a small village where the workers could rest eat and drink they would even be small hospitals inside these villages to take care of any injuries.
I'm just shocked how many people don't understand multiplication. Like, they know the surface level methods, but they seemed to not understand the conceptual understanding of how it works which is kinda scary. More so how arrogant in their stubborness they are when being corrected.
Interrupted Neil Degrasse Tyson explaining the Dunning Krueger effect to give a worse and much longer winded explanation.... That's peak lol
what’s actually really funny about this whole podcast episode on Joe Rogan is Joe Rogan himself stated multiple times and other episodes. How actors are just bat shit crazy most of the time and funny enough. The first thing he does is think I like Terrence Howard let me bring him on and guess what crazy as fuck I bet you ain’t bringing another famous person on again🤣
I invent a new geometry every time I pass out on the couch after too many beers.
Your perfect summary of Dunning Kruger helps me appreciate going to college and experiencing that slide of humility so much. I feel like a huge rift between friends of mine who barely got an education is often related to the fact that they've never experienced the middle of the valley and 'knowing enough to know you know very little' - They strut around with bewildering confidence about so much, primarily argue emotionally, and are constantly vulnerable to all kinds of scams, exploitation, hype and impulsivity.
Some friend you are, talking shit about them on the internet behind their back
@@bonjour2838 Fair, I suppose? But I would suggest that you miss the bigger picture.
The point is not to demean, and I wouldn't mention anyone by name. I think people recognize that to hold patience and make room for friends who can display problematic behavior is both a taxing and altruistic venture.
One of the tell tale signs of Narcissism is that when they aren't a subject matter expert on anything they have to be on something. Examples; conspiracy theories, politics, law and especially acting.
Love it! Keep them coming
mate your content keeps getting better kudos
I have to be honest, I did not expect Niel to be so patient and nice to this degree. As of late he has at times came off very narcissistic and crude.
It was enjoyable to watch
“the precipice of Mt stupid” 😂
The flat earther stuff. LOL GOATED
I wanna ask Terrence if 2x3 =6 makes sense to him.
Cuz there’s only 2 and 3. On one side. But 6 on the other side. Lol
don't know why this is here, even tho I'm not saying you can't speak about whatever you like... even if you have actively talked about this b4... for... reasons...
but even if I assume this is just an attempt to respond to a wave of folks backing howard, I don't think those people who believe 1x1=2 will ever be dissuaded from their views/beliefs on it... and frankly I question the "need" to try and convince them otherwise, obviously those folks do not work on anything crucial to us as a species.. but let's assume, for a sec, that some of them do, oh bo-i then we surely have much bigger problems indeed...
Neil responding to this tho makes sense, not so much for being a scientist and being involved in spreading knowledge through social media, but in fact cuz he was directly referenced and interacted w/ by howard...
Yeah. They don’t need evidence to back their claims but then there are people who don’t know the right answer who actually do value evidence
Ppl like Terrance are a normal occurrence in 2024 unfortunately
Terrence Howard needs help. I think he is genuinely clinically insane. He thinks he's a god.
Terrence Howard's thesis is "If you have haters, you're doing something right."
Terrence Howard calls all the "establishment scientists" for the last millennia "liars". So they must be doing something right.
One of TH's many many problems is that he is completely inconsistent in his "reasonings".
So what's it called when someone stays at Mt Stupid without gaining any new knowledge to learn they were wrong.....
Professor Dave is just evil😭😭😭that guy was tearing Terrence apart like a psychopath😂😂🤣🤣
2:45 HAH He said "Duty" lol😂
Hey Terrance. I have a bag of apples. I want you to reach in and take 1 apple 1 time. Tell me how many apples you have?
Great video!!.................I have to ask lol . How are you actually seating? (minute marker 8:45) are you lounging...but seating ...crooked? Are you comfortable? I guess you are otherwise you would not be seating/lounging like that? Sorry about my random thought! Great video/explanation!!
I like Neil because he explains it in a way that an idiot could understand but he doesn’t say “you’re an idiot and here’s why you’re wrong”
"The precipice of Mt. Stupid." Gonna log that winner away for a rainy day. Thanks Luke, lol.
I understand if an initial axiom is incorrect, then what follows is irrelevant. I also understand the reviewed paper is online, but I would like to hear Neil comment on the last 30 pages.
Either Neil was being charitable to a fellow brotha, or he was leaving the door open in case Howard might possibly be on to something that might manifest in the future.
.
Why even give a platform to people like Howard? He obviously is unbalanced.
I think the term is “lack of whole object relations” which is tied to a “lack of object constancy.” He thinks in terms of “all good” or “all bad” when it comes to himself, others and institutions. Regular people that don’t lack OC can see themselves and others as an integrated whole with both positive and negative attributes. Terrence is unable to make appropriate predictions about others or himself because of the way he splits his negative attributes away from her identity (and subsequently how he projects negative or positive attributes onto others), usually caused by the immense emotional sting of shame. So the adaption he and other narcissists develop is essentially a feedback loop that avoids self shame. Primary reason why he doesn’t need evidence because evidence in many cases is “all bad” and would lead to an enormous amount of shame for Terrence. This also goes into why narcissists avoid empathy, if they were ever able to empathize with someone who sees a flaw in them they’d self destruct. You can see it in his Oxford speech when several of the students challenge him on his ideas, he quickly changes the subject or snaps (due object constancy), or uses his patents and weirdly constructed drone device as evidence, though 1x1=2 couldn’t have possibly been used in the formation of that drone.
I was trying to think of a way that you could possibly make 1x1=2 work. The only thing I could think of would be a container with 2 things in it. My thought process was if you have 1 container with 2 items in it times itself you could stretch that into being 1x1=2, but in reality that would actually look like (1x2)x1=2, simplified into 2x1=2. Any additional factor you try to include to make 1x1=2 changes the equation into something else, which falsifies the math you're trying to force.
the smug arrogance of being confidently wrong about everything that just oozes from Terrence's pores is pretty funny
The problem with people today is that they WANT TO BELIEVE. They are looking at the universe and thinking “is this all there is?… not on my watch!”. By hook or by crook people will believe what they want to believe.
This is the best video breakdown of megalomania that I have seen 😁👍
Bro, it’s so messed up that people do these kinds of videos and don’t have a link to the original video
I bet Terrence thinks Dirf is a real number.
6:33 I’ve lost track of how many times I’ve seen interstellar and still have issues understanding theory of relativity and time dilation 😂
If I play 1 video game 1 time how many video games have I played? If I have 1 cookie 1 time how many cookies do I have? Terrance Howard isn't just the Dunning Kruger effect he's actually insane He obviously has Grandiose Ideas and narcissism probably severely Bi polar it's why he's been married so many times for short periods.
VERY nice explanation of the Dunning Kruger effect! I'd say you can TRULY never reach the top of "Mount Wisdom" though.
I forget who said it but they're were like if 1x1 = 2 then the phone you used to watch the video wouldn’t work cause our math is based on the concept that 1x1 = 1. Therefore, it’s impossible for 1x1 to equal anything but 1
Terrence probabtly believed he shoulda been iron man, then he let that live inside his head over the years and nows he thinks is terrence stark.
Theres nothing to be refuted when it's about a proven scientic fact that has been sucessfully applied in different fields for more than a century...
Neil took that effing fool far too seriously. I can't stand it.
Neil is so much nicer than I am.
Funny enough, one of the top physicists used to be a plumber.
The power of the son in the palm of my hand.
This reminds me of Rosanne on Piers Morgan when she said Jill Biden was a baby sitter for Joe Biden when the picture was of her when she was 24. Peirs told her that this was wrong and she said... I read it on Google haha.
Valley Girl Tyson and his Geeks is crazy.
Neil has always come off as a bit of a douche like he's the guy that would be in a room full of people and make it his goal to make sure EVERYONE knows he's the smartest person in that room but it's actually kinda nice to see him take this in a nice way without tearing into Terrance even though anyone could tell him how stupid his 1x1=2 thing is
You should listen to Billy Carlson. He makes Terrance a normal person 😂😂
A segue to the Dunning Kruger Effect - there is no mount and valley of stupid most of the times, and that interpretation is one of the most criticized. It's pretty hilarious that Luke pretty much confirms the thesis by himself that way. No offense, it's a really small thing 😊
There's a Bhudist saying that encapsulates the dunning krueggar effect: before a person begins the path to enlightenment, mountains are mountains and rivers are rivers on the path mountains are no longer mountains and rivers are no longer rivers, after enlightenment mountains are once again mountains and rivers are once again rivers.
Terry should be asked to built a computer device based on 1 x 1 = 2. easiest way to disprove him.
Now do the vid where Neil says it’s crazy that guys and girls have separate competitions
You just made a flat Earther watching somewhere very angry for that explanation! 😂😂
People are intellectually lazy.
Man spent longer explain the duning kruger effect than watching the video that explained it in 10 seconds
To be fair, he's addressing someone who claims they remember being born.....
Tyson is wrong about science not being a thing until around 1600. Greek philosophers proved the world round before the telescope and the microscope has nothing to do with that branch of science at all. Research into selective breeding is most definitely science and that was happening long before the invention of the microscope.
That is not a point for Howard in any way. Howard is still completely a nutbar. Just disputing Tyson's sense of history on those points.
i think terrance might be right on 1x1=2. In reference to a musical mathmatical theory, there is a quote that states "1, 2 buckle my shoe". What do shoes come in...they come in pairs. Think about it.
To fully understand Howard's thought processes, you have to watch the entire 3 hour JRE episode. There is a point where he explicitly states that to "multiply" is to "increase". That is the informal definition. The formal definition is the repeated ADDITION of equal sets of numbers. Saying "one times one" is the same as saying "count the number 'one' one time", 1+0. Two times one, count "one" two times, 1+1. One times three, count one three times, 1+1+1. Repeated addition. Division is the exact opposite, repeated subtraction. Howard also makes the error of trying to attribute physical characteristics to numbers. When you do that, it becomes impossible for there to be a number less than one. Zero has no attributes, therefore it does not exist. Another statement he made on JRE. If zero does not exist, then 1*1 does equal 2. 1*1 would be the same as saying 1+1 and the sum will always increase. If you have watched the JRE video, you may have missed where he completely tanks his thesis multiple times. He constantly was pulling up graphs and diagrams on his tablet. He also showed a Blender video which he says proves gravity is not a force. Both of those rely on 1*1=1 to operate. If 1*1=2, they would not work.
That alot of words for someone that also does not know what they are talking about
Multiplication does not mean to increase....and it certainly isn't right just cause you call it an informal def
@@DD-gi6kxRe-read what I wrote a bit slower this time. We are saying the same thing. I clearly said "...HE explicitly states that to 'multiply' is to 'increase'." I explain that is the informal definition. I then give the formal definition, the repeated addition of equal sets of numbers, which DOES NOT require an increase in the sum. Set theory. The long established and accepted theory. Which includes zero, or a null set. He changes the rules to make his thesis work by eliminating zero.
This guy looks and sounds like a young David Fincher. it's uncanny
I want to see Jamie pull up Dr Tysons response next JRE.
I hear this talk with the black isrealite/panafrican folk a lot. I had a friend who got into this stuff, and he speaks like Terrance. It's just a bunch of nonsense that fools others using big words incorrectly but sounds right enough to the uneducated.
1 x 1 means 'one instance of a particular sum, 1'. One instance of 1 is 1. 1× 2 means 'two instances of a particular sum, 1' which is 2: 1 x 2 = 2. Simple. I'm not sure how anyone could think differently. I don't get it.
1x1, for tax reasons, equals 2
I would not be surprised if Howard started a cult based on his ideas in the near future.
his session in oxford had lost me because he wasnt being clear about the power of life made me think its the power of weed tho u can see the determination and passion when he talks about it xD his cofidence was there but the explanation isnt enough
Tesla idea that if we were able to harness the power of the sun the other power sources are true. Our current inability to fully harness that power doesn't make the idea incorrect.
There are still people that think the Earth is flat too!🤦♂️
Imagine getting 1 coin from your pocket once. It can't be 2 since you got only 1 coin 1 time so 1×1=1. You get 2 coins once so 2×1=2. 1x1=2 can be debunked by elementary examples. It's fckin common sense.