The perfect messenger would be a philosopher. Someone who could actually explain the reasoning behind their stance. You know, bodily autonomy, thought experiments, etc. Someone who concludes that there is no right answer and that it's up to the individual the decide what they want to do not the government. Unfortunately people who can think are rarely successful.
i've thought a lot about how it would go down to propose a thought experiment against a republican in a debate. they'd just call you a gay baby and then everyone would cheer
I had just recently been giving Chapo some praise . . . And then I listened to this absolute garbage of false equivalence and apathy . . . Literally the desired result of authoritarian gaslighting campaigns. Don’t get me wrong, there was still a bit of good comedy in there, but the overall tone is of just sheep complaining, “both sides suck” which certainly is true, without going that extra bit to clarify that one side supports converting Margaret Atwood’s dystopian fiction into reality.
@@ElPINGAS9000 Thank you for clearly making my point. (Probably unintentionally) HRC is pretty horrible, but we wouldn't have had a minimum of 500k unnecessary deaths and $1.7 trillion in tax cuts for the ultra rich and corporations had she been elected. And there will be no guardrails for a second term.
@@seanpatrick1243 "HRC is pretty horrible, but we wouldn't have had a minimum of 500k unnecessary deaths and $1.7 trillion in tax cuts for the ultra rich and corporations had she been elected." This is based on literally nothing. The democrats were the opposition party, had nothing to lose, and would have never been held to account because it would have never even passed, but they didn't even try to virtue signal at some form of universal healthcare during a pandemic.
"Abortion? Have you seen my son?" - Perfect Messenger 2024
It's like the dog that caught the car, but it caught the front bumper and keeps getting run over.
The perfect messenger would be a philosopher. Someone who could actually explain the reasoning behind their stance. You know, bodily autonomy, thought experiments, etc. Someone who concludes that there is no right answer and that it's up to the individual the decide what they want to do not the government. Unfortunately people who can think are rarely successful.
i've thought a lot about how it would go down to propose a thought experiment against a republican in a debate. they'd just call you a gay baby and then everyone would cheer
What is up with this audio?
Nonconsentual compression
There is a worm in your ear.
This podcast was recorded in 2006. I’ll give it to them though, they were remarkably clairvoyant.
Ok, I’m genuinely not trying to be mean. But please get the guest guy a better microphone. I can barely pick out what he’s saying.
But enough from the geezers on womens rights, lets hear from Mr Chapo!
The youngest sounding 40-somethings in the game!
This comment section is too gay. Buncha babies
hey man, bad news, it's your doctor here, you've caught the gay
Correction. This comment section ain’t gay enough!
Not what your dad was saying when I was plowing him last night
i would watch more than 3 minutes of most of your videos at a time if you stopped having on guests with pieces of cardboard for mics
You don’t enjoy listening to two cackling hyenas reacting to an inaudible pun? Sounds like a you problem.
I had just recently been giving Chapo some praise . . . And then I listened to this absolute garbage of false equivalence and apathy . . . Literally the desired result of authoritarian gaslighting campaigns.
Don’t get me wrong, there was still a bit of good comedy in there, but the overall tone is of just sheep complaining, “both sides suck” which certainly is true, without going that extra bit to clarify that one side supports converting Margaret Atwood’s dystopian fiction into reality.
pokemon go to the polls
@@ElPINGAS9000
Thank you for clearly making my point. (Probably unintentionally) HRC is pretty horrible, but we wouldn't have had a minimum of 500k unnecessary deaths and $1.7 trillion in tax cuts for the ultra rich and corporations had she been elected. And there will be no guardrails for a second term.
@@seanpatrick1243
"HRC is pretty horrible, but we wouldn't have had a minimum of 500k unnecessary deaths and $1.7 trillion in tax cuts for the ultra rich and corporations had she been elected."
This is based on literally nothing. The democrats were the opposition party, had nothing to lose, and would have never been held to account because it would have never even passed, but they didn't even try to virtue signal at some form of universal healthcare during a pandemic.
Have you not listened to much of the show?
I thought the HRC comment was copy pasta. You know she loves war, historically right? 😂