What did this litigant claim the issue was that caused them to go to this extreme? The duty of the judiciary is to uphold Rights of "The People". "Laws" continue to be created that restrain the people. In many cases judges share the addresses of victims who have reached out o the courts as a last resort for help from abuse. And in "family court" cases across this country, judges give custody to convicted abusers and create "orders" of No-contact for victims - to prevent them from speaking up. There are several databases of abuse victims across this country that belong in this category. Biological families separated for speaking out about abuse and the teafficking of children through the federally funded state agencies.
What did this litigant claim the issue was that caused them to go to this extreme? The duty of the judiciary is to uphold Rights of "The People". "Laws" continue to be created that restrain the people. In many cases judges share the addresses of victims who have reached out o the courts as a last resort for help from abuse. And in "family court" cases across this country, judges give custody to convicted abusers and create "orders" of No-contact for victims - to prevent them from speaking up. There are several databases of abuse victims across this country that belong in this category. Biological families separated for speaking out about abuse and the teafficking of children through the federally funded state agencies.