Really good explication. I agree with others, your ability to explain things and get to the point in a short (shortest possible) amount of time is fantastic. Hopefully the magical UA-cam algorithm kicks in and starts recommending these videos to a large audience. I think once anyone watches one of your videos, they will come back for other topics.
It is often cumbersome to write the ⊗ symbol. Therefore you should be aware that the tensor product |φ> ⊗ |χ> is often written more simply as |φ>|χ> , or even as |φχ> .
Really good explication. I agree with others, your ability to explain things and get to the point in a short (shortest possible) amount of time is fantastic. Hopefully the magical UA-cam algorithm kicks in and starts recommending these videos to a large audience. I think once anyone watches one of your videos, they will come back for other topics.
This is the video I needed.
amazing
this help me lot in my study thanks
nice explained, your videos are under rated i think
thank you
Pls come to my school and replace my professor
Well explained but can you make a video for 3-Qubit Computational Basis States, Tensor Products.
can you explain how the 2x1 vectors inside the 4x1 vector collpase into inidices for the 4x1 vector??
What does the symbolism |0,1> means then??? (or |0,0> etc.)
How can the state | 0 0 > or | 1 1 > be a physically acceptable state? Aren't they violating Pauli's Exclusion Principle?
It is often cumbersome to write the ⊗ symbol. Therefore you should be aware that
the tensor product |φ> ⊗ |χ> is often written more simply as |φ>|χ> , or even as |φχ> .
@@amouxx1052 Yes, but don't do that in teaching this subject.
@@jacobvandijk6525 agree
Wouldn't that be the Kronecker Product at the start rather than the tensor product? Or are they the same thing.