3:35 Oh yes the ´´balance´´ things like mig19 , sabers , G91YS , F104A/C and much much more goings against Aim 9L´s , R60M´S , Magics ... yea the true balance
R-73 removed for balance? meanwhile F-14 having 6x Aim7's and 2x 9H's F-16's got 4x 9Ls and 2x Aim 7's dude with how much inbalance there is we unironically need an SU-27 to balance out the F-14... make it like SU-27 Early ( basically not have the R-77 ARH missile ) and then add some normal SU-27 with it to balance the F-15 lol just give R-73's they are basically equivalent of Aim 9L's ... R-60's are ancient at 11.7
they're not interested in actual balance. a flare sensitive r73 would have been perfect. make the mig 29 a menace at short range, while f14 and 16 dominate medium and long range. but instead they "balanced" it by making the mig 29 good at nothing and the tomcat/viper best at every range. the incompetence/greed is staggering
i think, and i'm not compeleteley sure about this, that if you fly at high altitude in a bomber, you get the vapour effect. just seem to remember seeing it in those circumstances.
are you planning to add the br of 0.5? by adding a max up-/downtier to 0.5-0.7, you could decompress your actual br system and make matches fairer. some vehicle still need a br-rebalance though.
Q: can you show the fastest and slowest vehicles in each of the 5 vehicle options (tank, plane, heli's, bluewater, and coastal ships) in a race of sorts?
What For "To keep the balance" the F 14 can easily keep up with the Mig 29, you guys shoud have not added the F 16, all players playing Air Realistic or Arcade matches in an nation other then america have been suffering in top tier jet fights for month with the F 14 and now F 16. Why did you remove the R-73 from the Mig 29, if the F 16´s get a nearly unflareable missiles, which is as good as the R-73. You dont eaven give other Nations the chance of bullying the F 14 and F 16 players, in return for the last 6 Month or so. Give the Mig 29 their missiles back, its just fair to give the pain back to the F 14 and F 16 players! Btw, I spend all my 40 Flares and Chaff from the Mig 23 ML on trying to avoid being hit by an Aim 9L from an F 16 or Aim 7E from an F 14, still hit me, how is that fair? Pls nerv the radar of the F 14 so that the missiles cant hit that easily, btw the Radar of the F 14A which is in the model, only had the F 14B not the F 14 A. And make a barrier between Cold War (Mig 23, Mig 21, F 14 ...) and the new F 16 and Mig 29, so that Air mid tier can still make fun!
If gaijin think about balance and not able to release R-73 in game, what's going on with F-14 and F-16s capable of right now. AIM-9L = R-60M??? Even R-27ER are highly potential but shitty ass radar snaps all the full advantages. They are planning to add R-73 when Su-27 or AIM-9M show up in the game lol
@@t65bx25 No, he's got a point, gaijin considers the aim9L a counterpart to the r60m despite its much higher range and incomparably higher flare resistance, with both being able to pull 30g. That makes it clear that they won't add r-73 unless the US team gets something much better, which would probably be the 9X. Underlying reason is likely that gaijin makes more money from US jets players, so they want to make sure that the balance favors them at the expense of other nations. Basically making war thunder a PvE game for US players.
@@CloudEcho The gap between the AIM-9L and 9X is an entire generation, and decades. I’m not contesting its dumb that Gaijin’s overestimating the Soviet missiles so hard, but the 9X is not the next iteration right around the game’s corner. Versions like the 9M were a major player, again for decades. We are not going to be getting the 9X before the AMRAAM, and we are not going to be getting the AMRAAM before the 9M, or even the 7M for that matter. What I’m saying is the 9X is becoming a buzzword that reduces the credibility of anyone protesting the R-73’s omission.
@@t65bx25 You could be right but that depends on how they implement the r-73. If it has zero flare resistance like every soviet missile currently in the game then they will say it's equivalent to a 9m, if it has any kind of flare resistance then it's obvious that it will be compared to the 9x. both of these situations would reflect what's currently going on in the game with r60m being a "counter" to the 9L.
With the new french 2C bis add, I'd love to see an early multiturretted tanks comparison . I'm thinking Nb.Fz., T-35, Independant, Ro-Go and dont forget the M3 Lee.
Due to balance you can’t add R73??? Wait what? I wonder why USA has a higher win rate over everyone in air RB. If only there was a way to balance that…🤪
Me who is about to restart playing after some months because I got a little bored and went play other good games but now seeing that THESE vehicles are in: let’s see if I remember how it works
Just a small observation. The Klimov RD-33 is a turbofan engine, as well as the F-100 in the F-16. The Mig-29 and the Su-27 were the first to use them in the East.
Q: Are you guys looking to make the new VASI and PAPI lights on airfields actually functional? It’d be super helpful especially when trying to learn to land new/unfamiliar aircraft!
Will the Japanese Type 10 MBT receive modular armour in a future update? The tank weighs 44 tons in "standard configuration," but it can be fitted with extra armour, bringing its mass to 48 tons, and significantly improving its protection. (It can also be stripped to a 40-ton "base configuration" so it can drive on some bridges in Japan.) Will this be implemented in-game in the future?
Well things like the m1a2 sep and the t80BVM have an addon armor package, so it is possible for them to implement such a feature for the type 10 aswell
Although this information could be classified and, thus, not yet available, the additional protection such a package could provide could be extrapolated from other armour add-ons from the same era based on weight and (possible) composition.
If you have a WWII era airplane where the canopy slides back and forth on rails, it may be possible to fly with little effect with the canopy open. If you have a modern canopy which opens upwards, it should rip itself from its mountings not much after you reach gear-up speed. There might be some turbulence but the major performance issues are human factors. It gets severely cold at higher altitudes and the lack of pressurization (even with 100% Oxygen) can lead to some serious life-threatening bubbles in the joints, lungs and circulatory system.
Q: Are there any plans to include more frontal hull MGs in tanks? there are some, like the stuart, that have loads, while others, such as the Comet 1 have the machine gun in the hull modelled, but it does not exist on x-ray, and does not fire.
Gaigin should add the 40mm upgraded warrior it would give Britain a capable ifv like every other nation has at higher tiers E.G puma, marder, dardo, Bradley
Q: What are the seven Planes on the papers on the Tactical briefing screen when you enter a battle? My best Guess is the A6M, Bf 109, P-51, MiG 17, and maybe a B-17 but i have no idea what the other 2 are.
one thing tho Mig 29s ramps should start closing only after the engines start, and spool up to somewhere around 50 % RPM and the top louvres are spring loaded so they should only open once the ramp is closed and engines on and under high G maneuvers.
Q: would you guys ever think about improving the vr aspect of the game e.g. being able to you use your actual hands in the cockpit and being able to press buttons?
You're asking them to completely finish the modeling to all cockpits. As it stands nearly all cockpits that do have complete visual modeling don't actually have all the gadgets modeling completely. Many of them don't move and are more of a wallpaper cover of sorts. The ones that do actually function are mainly just standard stats that can be found in the top left-hand corner of the screen, to begin with. Sure some people would love to have functionality like that even I would like just a little bit of that but in truth, if it were to come we are still so far away from acquiring that. I'd suggest sticking to DCS, for now, other than that probably not gonna see that happen for a long while. Wishful thinking for sure though.
Q: Why has the abrams m1a2 sep armor not been updated. Many military magazines described the armor enhancement in this modernization of this tank. And why is the hull armor so different from the turret when it should be almost identical as well?
My favorite attack plane is the A-26. It works well for me and it's in that super fun 5.0BR range. I get a good amount of air kills from the gunners, the many offensive 50 cals make it easy to hit light ground targets, and the 4 1000lb bombs make short work of both heavy GT and bases
Personally I either use the .50s and 37mm or just the duel 37mm guns and I generally do this with the 10 500lb bombs To say the least it shreds ground targets air targets and bases alike
Can we have large Air RB PvE map like the helicopter one? And include all mission like Air-to-Air, Air-to-ground, SEAD, CAP, Convoy assault, convoy support etc..
10:41 speaking of new hit markers can you make it an option for the new one and the old one? Personally I prefer the old one and I know lots of others who do. I think being able to choose would be a great addition!
Q:The Tornado has anti ship missiles but its br is too hight to bring it to naval matches, are you plannig to add modern ships with higher battlerating?
Q: I have been trying for awhile now. is there a way to manually set your wings (on planes like Tornado IDS/F-14/MiG 23) to set your wings to full sweep while on runway? even setting to "manual" mode doesn't seem to allow it.
Is there any way to remove the hit indicators for ground vehicles? Sometimes they can be misleading and annoying and other times (such as RB battles) I'd rather have them off.
Why does no one talk about that the F4J has the same aim feature for its IR missiles, like that you can lock the missile without having you to point your nose to your enemy?
I do love the IL-2s as an attack aircraft, but I wish they had their PTAB bombs, which they were most effective with. The Ilyushins ingame seem to be lacking a bit without them.
Q: With the addition of completely new voice lines in the naval side of war thunder will that eventually translate over to other areas of war thunder? In other words, will the Air and Ground forces get similar voice line additions? An example for ground could be either the gunner or loader of a tank reporting damage of the gun breach or the driver reporting damage to the engine or transmissions. An example of air could be the RIO and or WSO reporting damage to the aircraft or reporting enemy contacts, positions, fuel load, etc. If something like this is to come eventually to the game I would love to hear all about it.
Q : Why is the Mig-29’s radar so weak ? Its TWS mode doesn’t keep the “soft-lock” track vertically (unlike on the F-14), it doesn’t have any other ACM modes other than the vertical one, it doesn’t have any other scope other than than 50km… ?
When more counter parts with equal strength come out the Mig 29 will get not only the R73 but the R77's along with the Su 27 right? after all the F-15 and F-18 can carry Aim120's
Q: the Bt series had a function to drive without tracks due to suspension, is there something in the game, or something that could be added regarding this?
Question is there a chance that signal lights and headlights can be added as a choice in the selection menu that you can turn on/off for both tanks and planes??
Q: In the trailer "the battle is on" released 8 years ago showed a panther with only the driver alive and the turret off rushing towards the enemy as a last ditch effort. Can a feature like this be added to War Thunder or can't it happen because of technical reasons?
Hey gaijin, this one is not a question but you said that you read all the comments on the video. Sooo the marineflinger tornado drop tank has the same leaking part and looks like not connceted to the sweep wing
Q: On all Tornado's (or any other aircraft that can cover their engines like the tornado,) does the reversing of thrust make it's heat signature smaller due to the direct source of heat being covered?
3:35 Oh yes the ´´balance´´ things like mig19 , sabers , G91YS , F104A/C and much much more goings against Aim 9L´s , R60M´S , Magics ... yea the true balance
mk*
Do you remember the Harrier GR1? Against Mig15s
@@Fughzet there's both
Honestly, this game is broken
@@emergency_broadcast_system fax bro
R-73 removed for balance?
meanwhile F-14 having 6x Aim7's and 2x 9H's
F-16's got 4x 9Ls and 2x Aim 7's
dude with how much inbalance there is we unironically need an SU-27 to balance out the F-14... make it like SU-27 Early ( basically not have the R-77 ARH missile ) and then add some normal SU-27 with it to balance the F-15 lol
just give R-73's they are basically equivalent of Aim 9L's ... R-60's are ancient at 11.7
they're not interested in actual balance. a flare sensitive r73 would have been perfect. make the mig 29 a menace at short range, while f14 and 16 dominate medium and long range. but instead they "balanced" it by making the mig 29 good at nothing and the tomcat/viper best at every range. the incompetence/greed is staggering
@@CloudEcho it’s funny because with the r27ers it can out joust both of those planes. However once you use them it becomes mediocre at best
We don’t need a su we need minor nations to get things on par with the Tom cats like Japan not Russia with a mig 29
F-14A : 11.3 (with AIM-9H & AIM-7F & AIM-54A)
MiG-29 : 11.7 (with R-60M & R-27ER)
Balanced?
Attack means ground strike like killing tanks
@@tropic2464 ?
Q: Are we going to see Vapor Wing effects in the future? Or there is no plan to add that in-game? 👀
i think, and i'm not compeleteley sure about this, that if you fly at high altitude in a bomber, you get the vapour effect. just seem to remember seeing it in those circumstances.
And updates effects from the engines. Afterburners are just an orange rod and they look dumb
yes
r73 removed for balance? you guys delusional?
Q: Will wing vapor effects be added to jets? I have heard many people want this too.
This, as well as proper contrails and reducing the mach effect so it doesn't happen unless the conditions are right
Q: Should we expect tier 8 in ground battles adding tanks like the T90M, Leopard2A7 and m1a2 sepv3?
are you planning to add the br of 0.5? by adding a max up-/downtier to 0.5-0.7, you could decompress your actual br system and make matches fairer. some vehicle still need a br-rebalance though.
Q: can you show the fastest and slowest vehicles in each of the 5 vehicle options (tank, plane, heli's, bluewater, and coastal ships) in a race of sorts?
What For "To keep the balance" the F 14 can easily keep up with the Mig 29, you guys shoud have not added the F 16, all players playing Air Realistic or Arcade matches in an nation other then america have been suffering in top tier jet fights for month with the F 14 and now F 16.
Why did you remove the R-73 from the Mig 29, if the F 16´s get a nearly unflareable missiles, which is as good as the R-73.
You dont eaven give other Nations the chance of bullying the F 14 and F 16 players, in return for the last 6 Month or so.
Give the Mig 29 their missiles back, its just fair to give the pain back to the F 14 and F 16 players!
Btw, I spend all my 40 Flares and Chaff from the Mig 23 ML on trying to avoid being hit by an Aim 9L from an F 16 or Aim 7E from an F 14, still hit me, how is that fair?
Pls nerv the radar of the F 14 so that the missiles cant hit that easily, btw the Radar of the F 14A which is in the model, only had the F 14B not the F 14 A.
And make a barrier between Cold War (Mig 23, Mig 21, F 14 ...) and the new F 16 and Mig 29, so that Air mid tier can still make fun!
If gaijin think about balance and not able to release R-73 in game, what's going on with F-14 and F-16s capable of right now.
AIM-9L = R-60M???
Even R-27ER are highly potential but shitty ass radar snaps all the full advantages.
They are planning to add R-73 when Su-27 or AIM-9M show up in the game lol
They claim that r-60m is equivalent to aim-9L and r-73 is equivalent to aim-9X. what a balance🤣🤣🤣
“9x” “9x”
You know there are other missiles, right? P5’s, S’s, M’s are all to come to many of the planes that used them.
@@t65bx25 No, he's got a point, gaijin considers the aim9L a counterpart to the r60m despite its much higher range and incomparably higher flare resistance, with both being able to pull 30g. That makes it clear that they won't add r-73 unless the US team gets something much better, which would probably be the 9X. Underlying reason is likely that gaijin makes more money from US jets players, so they want to make sure that the balance favors them at the expense of other nations. Basically making war thunder a PvE game for US players.
@@CloudEcho The gap between the AIM-9L and 9X is an entire generation, and decades. I’m not contesting its dumb that Gaijin’s overestimating the Soviet missiles so hard, but the 9X is not the next iteration right around the game’s corner. Versions like the 9M were a major player, again for decades. We are not going to be getting the 9X before the AMRAAM, and we are not going to be getting the AMRAAM before the 9M, or even the 7M for that matter.
What I’m saying is the 9X is becoming a buzzword that reduces the credibility of anyone protesting the R-73’s omission.
@@t65bx25 You could be right but that depends on how they implement the r-73. If it has zero flare resistance like every soviet missile currently in the game then they will say it's equivalent to a 9m, if it has any kind of flare resistance then it's obvious that it will be compared to the 9x. both of these situations would reflect what's currently going on in the game with r60m being a "counter" to the 9L.
@@CloudEcho what you mean by zero flare resistance in soviet missiles lol most missiles go away by seeing 1 enemy flare unless it’s bvr 😂
Q:Is there going to be condensation for turning Jets in the future. I would really like to see that
For balance? Do you really think that's the right way? You guys need to think again from the beginning.
With the new french 2C bis add, I'd love to see an early multiturretted tanks comparison . I'm thinking Nb.Fz., T-35, Independant, Ro-Go and dont forget the M3 Lee.
The m3 lee is already in the game and has been for years
@@sugarflame1833 All of this tanks
MiG-29 - the star of Ace Combat series.
45 years of MiG-29 "Fulcrum" in 2022.
F-16 can get 2 AIM-7M and 4 AIM-9L but MiG-29 can't even have a missile that won't eat the first flare it sees. Even R-27T is nerfed to oblivion.
Due to balance you can’t add R73??? Wait what? I wonder why USA has a higher win rate over everyone in air RB. If only there was a way to balance that…🤪
Is it possible to add a button for the aircraft to go directly to the pod view?
Me who is about to restart playing after some months because I got a little bored and went play other good games but now seeing that THESE vehicles are in: let’s see if I remember how it works
in sake of balance lol, you are wiping your ass with top tier balance for 3 years
Q:will the WT team update the single player in the future?
Q: YES PLEASE AND HOW ABOUT FINISHING THE SINGLE PLAYER CAMPAIGN THAT ENDS IN 42/43?
Nothing like starting off the year with a terrific episode. Good stuff, Gaijin!
🤖
@@Haloguy7 Well, that's an odd reply.
how is it bad?
@@dhmhtrhs. i think he means terrific in a good way.
THX for adding the MIG-29
Q. Will stealth fighters be included in any major updates at some point?
We will see them one day, but we are not close
@@OzzyTheWild nighthawk could be added
I'm so happy about these changes especially Stryker one! :3
Just a small observation. The Klimov RD-33 is a turbofan engine, as well as the F-100 in the F-16.
The Mig-29 and the Su-27 were the first to use them in the East.
Q- who is the diference on the japanese bomb of 800kg whit 30 kg of TNT and the bomb of 800kg whit 400kg of TNT?
In response to the MiG-29 not having R-73s I might ask what balance did you achieve?
Q: Are you guys looking to make the new VASI and PAPI lights on airfields actually functional? It’d be super helpful especially when trying to learn to land new/unfamiliar aircraft!
This is what i really want
Might 29 is cool but Imma stick with my P-51 for now
THANKS Gaijin for adding MiG29 !! MUCH LOVE!!!
Q:will their be more squadron helicopters ?
Ehhh how long does it take to explore this plane(((✈
Q why wasn’t the f14a tomcat moved to rank viii even though It’s an early 4th gen fighter
Q:Will you add the T-64 (1963)-The OG T-64 with weaker armor and 115mm cannon
Will the Japanese Type 10 MBT receive modular armour in a future update?
The tank weighs 44 tons in "standard configuration," but it can be fitted with extra armour, bringing its mass to 48 tons, and significantly improving its protection. (It can also be stripped to a 40-ton "base configuration" so it can drive on some bridges in Japan.)
Will this be implemented in-game in the future?
they should that would be cool
Well things like the m1a2 sep and the t80BVM have an addon armor package, so it is possible for them to implement such a feature for the type 10 aswell
Although this information could be classified and, thus, not yet available, the additional protection such a package could provide could be extrapolated from other armour add-ons from the same era based on weight and (possible) composition.
If you have a WWII era airplane where the canopy slides back and forth on rails, it may be possible to fly with little effect with the canopy open. If you have a modern canopy which opens upwards, it should rip itself from its mountings not much after you reach gear-up speed. There might be some turbulence but the major performance issues are human factors. It gets severely cold at higher altitudes and the lack of pressurization (even with 100% Oxygen) can lead to some serious life-threatening bubbles in the joints, lungs and circulatory system.
Q: Are there any plans to include more frontal hull MGs in tanks? there are some, like the stuart, that have loads, while others, such as the Comet 1 have the machine gun in the hull modelled, but it does not exist on x-ray, and does not fire.
Q: is the Kfir C.10 or an upgraded C.7 too advanced for the Israeli Tech Tree? Would it been a better option or an upcoming option for the future?
Gaigin should add the 40mm upgraded warrior it would give Britain a capable ifv like every other nation has at higher tiers E.G puma, marder, dardo, Bradley
Every nation except France lmao
Q: will props ever get drop tanks? Such as a 108 gallon tank on the P-51C
Q: Will Planes like the Mustang and P-47 Get drop tanks in 2023?
Keep breaking the game you're very good at it!
Q: What are the seven Planes on the papers on the Tactical briefing screen when you enter a battle? My best Guess is the A6M, Bf 109, P-51, MiG 17, and maybe a B-17 but i have no idea what the other 2 are.
Q: When are you going to update the bomber cockpits or is there a reason why you don't?
Q:would you ever consider adding some of the ship launched floatplane to the tech trees (i would love to see the supermarine walrus)
Q. How do you effectively use aircraft laid magnetic mines?
one thing tho Mig 29s ramps should start closing only after the engines start, and spool up to somewhere around 50 % RPM and the top louvres are spring loaded so they should only open once the ramp is closed and engines on and under high G maneuvers.
Q: are you able to use drones like the predator in custom battles and how?
Q:Hello gaijin, could we see in the game all planes with their additional fuel tanks? (if they had in the past)
they all ready did, additional fuel tanks were just added last update
Q: what plane has the most turrets? not guns per turret
Probably bv-238 or pe8
Q: would you guys ever think about improving the vr aspect of the game e.g. being able to you use your actual hands in the cockpit and being able to press buttons?
You're asking them to completely finish the modeling to all cockpits. As it stands nearly all cockpits that do have complete visual modeling don't actually have all the gadgets modeling completely. Many of them don't move and are more of a wallpaper cover of sorts. The ones that do actually function are mainly just standard stats that can be found in the top left-hand corner of the screen, to begin with. Sure some people would love to have functionality like that even I would like just a little bit of that but in truth, if it were to come we are still so far away from acquiring that. I'd suggest sticking to DCS, for now, other than that probably not gonna see that happen for a long while. Wishful thinking for sure though.
Q: Hey gaijin-team, can you tell me if the German planes with 75 mm cannons where effective in the real world and where were the used
Have you researched the matter yourself? I'm sure there is something written on the Hs 129s performance in the vast seas of internet.
@@AlreadyTakenTag It's very debated.
Q: Will wing vapor effects be added to jets?
Is there any chance of you adding the Cromwell vi/viii ( the 95mm version)?
Q: Why has the abrams m1a2 sep armor not been updated. Many military magazines described the armor enhancement in this modernization of this tank. And why is the hull armor so different from the turret when it should be almost identical as well?
My favorite attack plane is the A-26. It works well for me and it's in that super fun 5.0BR range. I get a good amount of air kills from the gunners, the many offensive 50 cals make it easy to hit light ground targets, and the 4 1000lb bombs make short work of both heavy GT and bases
Personally I either use the .50s and 37mm or just the duel 37mm guns and I generally do this with the 10 500lb bombs
To say the least it shreds ground targets air targets and bases alike
Lower repair costs when?
When snails fly
Can we have large Air RB PvE map like the helicopter one?
And include all mission like Air-to-Air, Air-to-ground, SEAD, CAP, Convoy assault, convoy support etc..
Why can we only test drive vehicles that are available for purchase? How will I test the plane I want to buy at a much later stage?
10:41 speaking of new hit markers can you make it an option for the new one and the old one? Personally I prefer the old one and I know lots of others who do. I think being able to choose would be a great addition!
Yes sir!
These new hitmarkers giving world of tank vibes
@@adhip0574 my thoughts exactly, don't want war thunder to turn into another WoT type game
Wish you guys add a tutorial on settings for console and pc players that would be nice.
Q:The Tornado has anti ship missiles but its br is too hight to bring it to naval matches, are you plannig to add modern ships with higher battlerating?
Of course they will
yes, i hope they will.
Will there be Greek polish or Greek vehicles be added? Also will we have the t50 on metal beasts on shooting range any time soon?
So do you think when it has been pushed up to 12.0 fighting F15s and F16s with 9ms that adding r73s are plausible now?
Q: I have been trying for awhile now. is there a way to manually set your wings (on planes like Tornado IDS/F-14/MiG 23) to set your wings to full sweep while on runway? even setting to "manual" mode doesn't seem to allow it.
only the f14 can do it for carrier operation.
Is there any way to remove the hit indicators for ground vehicles? Sometimes they can be misleading and annoying and other times (such as RB battles) I'd rather have them off.
Q: Why does the SU22m3 only able to carry IR rear aspect R60s? why not other missiles?
Why does no one talk about that the F4J has the same aim feature for its IR missiles, like that you can lock the missile without having you to point your nose to your enemy?
did you watch the entire episode
@@jewjet1165 Sorry have not watched the whole episode... Now I realized
Why do canopies not break when open and flying at mach 1+? Shouldn't they break?
Great Job. Isn't it too soon? How about some planes from The Great War? Great Job. Looking for more. Submarines maybe?!
I do love the IL-2s as an attack aircraft, but I wish they had their PTAB bombs, which they were most effective with. The Ilyushins ingame seem to be lacking a bit without them.
Q: With the addition of completely new voice lines in the naval side of war thunder will that eventually translate over to other areas of war thunder? In other words, will the Air and Ground forces get similar voice line additions? An example for ground could be either the gunner or loader of a tank reporting damage of the gun breach or the driver reporting damage to the engine or transmissions. An example of air could be the RIO and or WSO reporting damage to the aircraft or reporting enemy contacts, positions, fuel load, etc. If something like this is to come eventually to the game I would love to hear all about it.
Personally I think the MiG-27 series is the best of all the attackers, it’s fast, has a 30mm rotary cannon and has really good anti armor missiles.
Q:¿Which Russian MBT is better? ¿A T-72B3 or a T-90A?
Will a6m zero get fuel tanks like how history goes and how do I go to carrier battles
Q: in RB battles how do successfully drop bombs from dive bombers close to your intended target?
Q : Why is the Mig-29’s radar so weak ? Its TWS mode doesn’t keep the “soft-lock” track vertically (unlike on the F-14), it doesn’t have any other ACM modes other than the vertical one, it doesn’t have any other scope other than than 50km… ?
When more counter parts with equal strength come out the Mig 29 will get not only the R73 but the R77's along with the Su 27 right? after all the F-15 and F-18 can carry Aim120's
Hi could you do a feature for adding or removing thing added on tanks like storage box that are not on the real industrial model.
Q: Can you update the texture of afterburner ? They look odd and old next to the models .
Q: the Bt series had a function to drive without tracks due to suspension, is there something in the game, or something that could be added regarding this?
Favourite attack aircraft is a intresting one the yak38 premium because of its versitility
when does the effective pulling apart of the BR take place?
will you consider adding the modular armor for the leo 2a6 ? (german )
Question is there a chance that signal lights and headlights can be added as a choice in the selection menu that you can turn on/off for both tanks and planes??
Q: In the trailer "the battle is on" released 8 years ago showed a panther with only the driver alive and the turret off rushing towards the enemy as a last ditch effort. Can a feature like this be added to War Thunder or can't it happen because of technical reasons?
Hey gaijin, this one is not a question but you said that you read all the comments on the video. Sooo the marineflinger tornado drop tank has the same leaking part and looks like not connceted to the sweep wing
Why does has the F-82E two pilots, and what are the tasks of the 2nd person?
Q: On all Tornado's (or any other aircraft that can cover their engines like the tornado,) does the reversing of thrust make it's heat signature smaller due to the direct source of heat being covered?
whats the point of PAPI lights to airports if there is no night battles in air RB and air SB
A-18 warthog. Is my favourite attack aircraft
Q: if your tank is hit and the engine catches fire but you drive it into a lake or a river (in game), will the fire be put out?
Q. Whats the little pole between the rocket launchers on the U-SH?
Gunner sight
Q: We gonna see more modern aircraft carriers? So we can have air battles in the middle of ocean in Air RB
Hey war thunder will u guys be updating the pilots looks on modern aircraft
Q: are you guys going to add the su 35 and the f18 eventually
My fav attack plane in war thunder is now the a1h
SO MANY BOMBS
SO MANY ROCKETS
SO MANY GUNS
Why does the Ju88 C6 have downwards fireing Guns?