Gatekeeper | Worth Your Time and Money (Overview)

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 12 тра 2024
  • Gatekeeper is the new game we are looking at today with a Review of what it is and how its gameplay plays. First we will review the need to know basics of Gatekeeper before jumping into deeper gameplay impressions. Gatekeeper is a fast-paced rogue-like. Go on a quest to find the stolen Heart of the Universe and shoot your way through the hordes of machine enemies guarding the planetary gates. Play solo or in 4 people co-op and become the next Guardian!
    Worth Your Time and Money | Reviews | 2024: • Worth Your Time and Mo...
    Worth Your Time and Money | Overviews | 2024: • Worth Your Time and Mo...
    Worth Your Time and Money | Special Events | 2024: • Worth Your Time and Mo...
    #Gatekeeper #gameplay #review @TheScarletSeeker
    / thescarletseeker
    / discord
    / scarletseeker
    / @thescarletseeker
    KEY PROVIDED BY THE DEVELOPER
  • Ігри

КОМЕНТАРІ • 14

  • @rustyshackleford6534
    @rustyshackleford6534 Місяць тому +11

    I agree with your main argument; developers should be making the game they wanted to make rather than the game they think people want.
    Small feedback: the title of the series seems like a statement, you might want to consider adding a question mark after it.

  • @-LightSmit
    @-LightSmit 29 днів тому +1

    Wanted to get the game, but not anymore. It looks so safe as you've said. Thanks for saving me a buck.

  • @TommiLAWL
    @TommiLAWL Місяць тому +4

    I agree with you, game looks like it has no soul, no true identity of its own, just another generic action roguelite, except boringly dull. I even recognised a lot of the store bought assets they used.

  • @CyberKnightt
    @CyberKnightt Місяць тому +1

    I loved the demo (Infinity) and am trying to fall in love with the current EA version. I find that the difficulty ramped up mercilessly; I can barely get through 30 minutes whereas on the demo I would go for hours and have to shut it off. I think the visuals, sounds, and controls are spot on.

  • @senditall152
    @senditall152 Місяць тому +1

    Good point that I fail to consider from time to time.

  • @user-vd4or3ek8d
    @user-vd4or3ek8d 14 днів тому

    Ive played this for 4 or 5 hours and It feels like a mix of RoR 2 and soulstone survivors aesthetic/music.
    I think its good and didnt know about all the beta branches, looking forward to unlocking all the classes
    I agree on the random limititedness, its reverse engineered and regurgiatated as all hell, i suppose they wanted to get closer to the meta maybe? who knows.

  • @achalkley92
    @achalkley92 25 днів тому +2

    i think them taking the whole unique aspect about defending the gate is a big L for me. played the earlier builds and enjoyed them. but knowing now that it has been removed makes me feel that they have removed the only unique thing about the game. without that, what is actually unique about this game anymore. unless they add it back, it's a hard pass for me now. sad times because i was actually hyped for this, but not anymore.

  • @nomoturtle1788
    @nomoturtle1788 Місяць тому +1

    It seems unfair to make your whole review about what you did, but I agree with your point anyway, it is uninspiring.
    Regardless, I enjoy it for it's proximity to risk of rain, and the isometric perspective and its consequences are good enough to shake that up enough to be distinct.

    • @NTelling
      @NTelling 22 дні тому

      Well said, but I think he makes a valid point. They've basically remade RoR with little innovation. I feel like if this is a game you're interested in, you might as well just play RoR which looks much better. If you've already played RoR then you've basically already played this too. I'm also glad to have reviewers that are this critical; there are so many games that are worth playing, so a game better offer something of substance if the devs want players to buy it over another title. I definitely see that this game has potential, but they'll need to find their own niche; as of now, it seems kinda bland.

  • @Kushey4025
    @Kushey4025 Місяць тому +2

    First video I've disagreed with lol

  • @daleflanagan5140
    @daleflanagan5140 Місяць тому

    Homeworld 3

  • @Salamangkero
    @Salamangkero Місяць тому

    To be fair they have to keep the game afloat. There's so many games that decided to do their own thing and became really good games, but it wasn't well received financially. Omega strikers, pvz heroes, clash mini, kurtzpel and many more tried to do their own thing, and what happened is that they became great games, but bad money-makers. To be fair kurtzpel crashed and burned because of the maintainance they were doing themselves but there really are great games out there only supported by word of mouth and not by wallets, and just died because of it.

  • @yabani2012
    @yabani2012 Місяць тому

    So much gibberish, just showcase the game

    • @DarkMatter500
      @DarkMatter500 Місяць тому +5

      Did you click on the video and just not read the title?