I haven’t watched the movie yet but seen bits and pieces. And I can’t believe how much she loved her family before she met her lover. Then gave everything up for a man she barely knew, even her life.
Hi, so in the book it is clear she loves her son, but she was matched to her husband when she was only 19 years old and he was 39. It was a marriage of status. Alexia her husband also took this as a marriage of status and connection and never was a very emotionally intimate or available for Anna and she was very lonely. When she met Vronsky it was the first time Anna ever fell in love and the first time she hadn't felt alone in a long time, because she could share all her pain with Vronsky and he stayed in the beginning. She was never okay with the fact that she had to leave her son, but ended up doing it because of a deep depression she entered after she gave birth to her and Count Vronsky's daughter. I'm not saying that was right by any means, but the way her mind goes in the book makes you really feel bad for her and she really was struggling with her mental health. Later on, she is literally addicted to drugs. It's just a tragedy from the very beginning. Especially when you realize her brother made worse mistakes than she did, he ends up gambling away his fortune and has to use his wife's inheritance for help, he also continuously cheats on his wife with a variety of women and doesn't care if his wife knows or not, because he realizes she can never leave. Anna on the other hand realizes that she has made a mistake in her life and makes another big mistake by cheating on her husband, but still it was with only one person and she gets shunned by society and loses her parental rights to her son and then isn't even granted a divorce that could possibly give her a little more social acceptance. It really did highlight the gender differences that existed and still exist in society.
@@aruglaempire2518Maybe it was both. The complete package so few get. And everyone else hated that she had found it and they had settled so they set out to ruin it. We really don’t know. What we do know was that Anna was okay with it until society wasn’t. Had she just not cared what jealous, hateful people thought, she may have felt safe enough to be true to herself and find out. Self-discovery is one of life’s greatest purposes, no? What if Anna was able to discover truth without all the shame? Truth, by its nature, will be revealed. Why all the societal need to manipulate her into it?
This is the kind of scenes you get when the director is obsessed with the craft rather than telling the story. Brilliant to watch as standalones, horrible injustice to the original book
Ive only read the book so idk if the movie is a little different, but Anna karenina was not a love story. If anything it was the opposite. It shows the suffering of even the purest love.
Keira Knightley is believable in the title role, and Jacqueline Durran's Oscar-winning costumes are alluring. Joe Wright's stylish direction is distracting though, and dilutes any emotional bandwidth in the film. 👎
Several of the characters in this adaptation were miscast imo. Jude Law is not unlikeable enough as Karenin and Aaron Taylor-Johnson is not dashing enough to be Count Vronsky while Keira Knightly is too disheveled and shrill to be alluring as Anna.
Одним словом фарс! Всё нелепо и неискренне( Даже на комедию не тянет. Какая-то ересь неопределенного жанра 🤦 Люди не позорьтесь не смотрите это 💩, читайте оригинал.
I cant believe it, its like a theatrical farce of Anna Karenina, its an art-for-art trial with zero wee bit of concern of addressing the audience.. Knightley is weak in acting and MacFadyen is downgraded by making him played a caricature role, the actors picked for wrong roles.. this AK version is amazingly a failure to me..
I haven’t watched the movie yet but seen bits and pieces. And I can’t believe how much she loved her family before she met her lover. Then gave everything up for a man she barely knew, even her life.
Cheaters never win.
Read the book. Just a suggestion.
Hi, so in the book it is clear she loves her son, but she was matched to her husband when she was only 19 years old and he was 39. It was a marriage of status. Alexia her husband also took this as a marriage of status and connection and never was a very emotionally intimate or available for Anna and she was very lonely. When she met Vronsky it was the first time Anna ever fell in love and the first time she hadn't felt alone in a long time, because she could share all her pain with Vronsky and he stayed in the beginning. She was never okay with the fact that she had to leave her son, but ended up doing it because of a deep depression she entered after she gave birth to her and Count Vronsky's daughter. I'm not saying that was right by any means, but the way her mind goes in the book makes you really feel bad for her and she really was struggling with her mental health. Later on, she is literally addicted to drugs. It's just a tragedy from the very beginning. Especially when you realize her brother made worse mistakes than she did, he ends up gambling away his fortune and has to use his wife's inheritance for help, he also continuously cheats on his wife with a variety of women and doesn't care if his wife knows or not, because he realizes she can never leave. Anna on the other hand realizes that she has made a mistake in her life and makes another big mistake by cheating on her husband, but still it was with only one person and she gets shunned by society and loses her parental rights to her son and then isn't even granted a divorce that could possibly give her a little more social acceptance. It really did highlight the gender differences that existed and still exist in society.
Did she though? Or did she play roles: perfect mother, perfect wife, perfect sister? And became unable to sustain the performance after Vronsky?
It's a {mysteriously, hypnotically} good film ❤ ❤ ❤
Matthew Macfadyen can act even through his face getting smooshed 💀
Never give everything for love .... Love is beautiful and in same time can destroy you ..
Loving someone completely is worth the pain even if it's never meant to be
That was not love. It was lust. BIG difference.
@@aruglaempire2518Absolutely correct. Love is not a feeling, it's an act of the will.
@@aruglaempire2518Maybe it was both. The complete package so few get. And everyone else hated that she had found it and they had settled so they set out to ruin it. We really don’t know. What we do know was that Anna was okay with it until society wasn’t. Had she just not cared what jealous, hateful people thought, she may have felt safe enough to be true to herself and find out. Self-discovery is one of life’s greatest purposes, no? What if Anna was able to discover truth without all the shame? Truth, by its nature, will be revealed. Why all the societal need to manipulate her into it?
This is the kind of scenes you get when the director is obsessed with the craft rather than telling the story. Brilliant to watch as standalones, horrible injustice to the original book
Ive only read the book so idk if the movie is a little different, but Anna karenina was not a love story. If anything it was the opposite. It shows the suffering of even the purest love.
I think shows how far one is will go for love, the passion comes with love.
@@margaretbailey491You mean lust.
" YOU'RE A CHARMING CREATURE " . . . I AGREE
I can only see Mr Darcy with a funny mustache! Love him!!!
" PAPERWORK IS THE SOUL OF RUSSIA . . FARMING IS ONLY THE STOMACH " (SO FUNNY)
Mr. DARCY! AMAZIN ACTOR! ❤❤❤❤
Mr. Darcy, yes, trying to help the bumbling redhead win over the blonde!
Why did they make Vronsky look like a gay dancer??
Her eyes are enough for role
A rich woman basically royalty sharing a passenger cabin, albeit a 1st class one? Unlikely. She'd have her own carriage
No it's because at that time train was a new trasportation in russia that's why she's sharing with another aristocrat
How bizarre that you think you have a better understanding than the novelist who wrote in the period.
#beautiful l Love You Keira Knightley 💞💞💞💞🇧🇷
I went ask you, where did you watch the movie?
I can send it to you it's very hard to find it free ... if you want give me your instagram or whatsapp so I can send it to you ....
I watched it on Amazon prime
In orderly 2:37
This film version of Anna Karenina is a true masterpiece!
I want to watch it again and again!
Keira Knightley is believable in the title role, and Jacqueline Durran's Oscar-winning costumes are alluring. Joe Wright's stylish direction is distracting though, and dilutes any emotional bandwidth in the film. 👎
Stevia is my favorite
He’s such a bumbler. The epitome of the mediocre male who has more than he deserves.
Трагедия показана нелепой комедией, ужас
Отвратительная постановка
Кому как, а по мне так очень интересно, хоть и своеобразно
Образ Анны удался, а вот представление о русской жизни мне кажется не достоверным, немного надуманным.
God I really wanted to see Mr and Mrs darcy😢
But here they r siblings 😩
Levin is too intense.
And socially awkward too.
Read the book. Levin is a train crash.
I must admit this is the most miscast adaptation of Anna Karenina.
Sorry all wrong
why do you feel so?
I love Keira so much, but I imagined Anna really different.
Love Keira as Anna ; but think Vronsky is miscast, as well as McFadden. Love the film as experiment though
Several of the characters in this adaptation were miscast imo. Jude Law is not unlikeable enough as Karenin and Aaron Taylor-Johnson is not dashing enough to be Count Vronsky while Keira Knightly is too disheveled and shrill to be alluring as Anna.
I very much disagree about Vronsky, but ok. I think he’s a nutcase but he’s hot af
Одним словом фарс! Всё нелепо и неискренне( Даже на комедию не тянет. Какая-то ересь неопределенного жанра 🤦
Люди не позорьтесь не смотрите это 💩, читайте оригинал.
I don't know why buy I didn't find the actess to be very beautiful in this movie she looks like she had some work done after the pride and prejudice.
I cant believe it, its like a theatrical farce of Anna Karenina, its an art-for-art trial with zero wee bit of concern of addressing the audience.. Knightley is weak in acting and MacFadyen is downgraded by making him played a caricature role, the actors picked for wrong roles.. this AK version is amazingly a failure to me..
I have read the book several times, but have not seen any of the films.
Which adaptation of AK do you recommend?