OMG 100% this!!! A textbook example of how not to run an interview/discussion in my opinion. I appreciate Cory is a fast talker and goes into great detail at length which is probably hard to curtail if you want to to engage passive attendees and their questions. The hosts either didn’t know this about Cory (not done their own research on the speaker) or didn’t adapt the format to make the speaker feel at east to talk about their expertise, the very thing they were invited to speak about. - Interrupting the speaker was just plain rude. - Interrupting them mid-flow to let them know that the topic they were talking about is something they wanted to address later in the session was just ludicrous! - “hey I’m going to stop you there so you know we wanted you to talk about this” - Interupting them to hurry through their grounded explanations and background context was hugely disrepectful. - Having prior warning that the speaker has to leave the session a few mins early for a radio interview, have them awkwardly sit through your 5 mins of outro spiel and shoutouts, and force them to cold hang up on the call without a proper goodbye was, frankly, the nail in the coffin. From the intro of the session the series sounded really interesting but if the sessions were all facilitated like this I don’t think I’ll bother.
Cory has opened so many vistas for my mind
delighted to find your Crash Course webinars back again. I found the previous ones really helpful, good clear information, that we all need.
Thanks a lot. Glad to be back!
Found CrashCourse after seeing a Cory reference. Good job and format. Obviously not easy to get intro, overview, summary and Q&A in
"Hey, can I interrupt you and quote parts of your book so I sound like I know what I'm talking about?"
OMG 100% this!!!
A textbook example of how not to run an interview/discussion in my opinion.
I appreciate Cory is a fast talker and goes into great detail at length which is probably hard to curtail if you want to to engage passive attendees and their questions. The hosts either didn’t know this about Cory (not done their own research on the speaker) or didn’t adapt the format to make the speaker feel at east to talk about their expertise, the very thing they were invited to speak about.
- Interrupting the speaker was just plain rude.
- Interrupting them mid-flow to let them know that the topic they were talking about is something they wanted to address later in the session was just ludicrous! - “hey I’m going to stop you there so you know we wanted you to talk about this”
- Interupting them to hurry through their grounded explanations and background context was hugely disrepectful.
- Having prior warning that the speaker has to leave the session a few mins early for a radio interview, have them awkwardly sit through your 5 mins of outro spiel and shoutouts, and force them to cold hang up on the call without a proper goodbye was, frankly, the nail in the coffin.
From the intro of the session the series sounded really interesting but if the sessions were all facilitated like this I don’t think I’ll bother.
How does a channel with such amazing content has so few subscribers? Subbed, hope you'll post more in the future.
33:26 -
34:24 - Twiddling
35:24 - Shareholders - or speculators 35:35 -
35:44 -
38:07 - That was adversarial interoperability
Any contract which breaks common / constitutional Law is null and void, and furthermore a written admission of guilt by the drafter of said contract.
38:10 - And if you tried to do that to fb, now, they would bomb you until the rubble bounced, right
38:19 - They'd [ facebook would ] use all those IP theories to stop you from doing unto them as they did unto others
37:00 - Mark's new plan was low resolution Second Life
38:15 - They'd [ facebook would ] use article six of the copyright directive
As much as I want to see the fall of Big Tech, still waiting for it to happen. So far they are richer and more powerful than ever...
38:18 - They'd [ facebook would ] use torous interference
31:45 yes we lied to our customers😂
medificazione :)