The Difference Between NL10 And NL10,000

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 20 сер 2024
  • Source of clips: • LLinusLLove vs Stefan1...
    Use solvers to crush your opponents - out now:
    ► www.2cardconfi...
    Use Code "CRUSH2024" for $100 off!
    A hand on NL10 and NL10k might look similar at first glance, but there are a lot of differences. In this video, we explore the difference between an NL10 losing player and the world's best poker players Linus "LLinusLLove" Löliger and Stefan "Stefan11222" Burakov.
    For that, we use the help of solver tool GTO Wizard - Get 10% off your first purchase through this link:
    ► gtowizard.com/... (*)
    Crush your player pool by exploiting them preflop:
    ► www.2cardconfi...
    Join the newsletter for additional breakdowns and insights:
    ► www.2cardconfi...
    Start crushing MTTs - up to $150 off tournament courses:
    ► www.raiseyoure... (*)
    BLACK FRIDAY SALE:
    ► www.raiseyoure...
    PAIRRD - Save to 10% on your first month:
    ► pairrd.com/?vi... (*)
    #poker #highstakespoker #pokerstars
    ___________________________________________
    More high stakes battles analyzed:
    Endboss Secrets: How To Use GTO To Exploit People:
    • Endboss Secrets: How T...
    The Most Epic Battle In Online Poker History - GTO?!:
    • The Most Epic Battle I...
    LLinusLLove's and Stefan11222's Overbet War: Genius or Madness?:
    • LLinusLLove's and Stef...
    ___________________________________________
    Contact me for inquiries:
    ► email: info@2cardconfidence.com
    ► discord: 2cardconfidence
    (*) affiliate link, which helps me continue to make these videos for free

КОМЕНТАРІ • 78

  • @miguelik
    @miguelik Рік тому +92

    They had us at the first half not gonna lie

  • @2CardConfidence
    @2CardConfidence  Рік тому +8

    Use solvers to play poker with confidence - out now: www.2cardconfidence.com/solver-mastery
    Additional notes for hands of the video:
    - In the simulation used, the river is never a donk shove for Stefan, but a range check
    Re 79s vs 6To:
    - flop play is approved, turn overbet is not a thing for Linus, solver only bets 50% pot
    - Stefan would almost never raise turn and 79s is a close call. But raising is actually also slightly +ev
    - Linus' 3bet is actually happening with many 6x
    - Linus' river check is approved, Stefan would never use the tiny size, but only jam or check. 79s is 100% jam
    -> Just for those that are interested. Not a judgement on good or bad play, as players might have reasons for deviations

    • @luckymaggie6594
      @luckymaggie6594 Рік тому

      Can I use gto+: for your upcoming course?

    • @consumer61
      @consumer61 Рік тому

      @2CardConfidence Great vid as usual.
      Having thought about the 79s vs T6 hand, I actually like Stefan's turn raise:
      He knows Linus shouldn't overbet here in theory and therefore the range is very polar, probably 6x or air / weak draws which he dominates (think hands like 78, 89, 74s, 43s). So he gets to punish this by raising for value vs these hands and checking back rivers (but also keeping the option to bluff river). Especially if Linus is imbalanced towards bluffs here (unlikely but possible since Linus is trying to exploit Stefan).
      Linus 3b ott also makes sense because he's saying fuck you I actually do have tonnes of 6x, and now Stefan is getting a good enough price to peel.
      Only thing I don't understand is river block bet from Stefan. What is he targeting? Surely he should jam to get fold equity or xb and win against the aforementioned missed draws he beats...
      Any ideas about this river play?

    • @2CardConfidence
      @2CardConfidence  Рік тому

      @@luckymaggie6594 Yes! The course includes PioSolver, GTO+ and GTO Wizard and most concepts can be applied with all of them

    • @2CardConfidence
      @2CardConfidence  Рік тому

      @@consumer61 Yeah I like your explanation and agree both players basically rep extremely polarized ranges. Regarding the riverbet I can only imagine Stefan thinks Linus would have a few draws/air hands in there that beat 9 high and which he could fold out

    • @consumer61
      @consumer61 Рік тому

      @@2CardConfidence Yeah it's the only thing which makes sense, but it would have to be spades, like Txss/Jxss specifically, but I am not sure Linus would 3b turn with these. Seems to me the block just isn't great... But Stefan knows a lot more than me xD

  • @straightup3329
    @straightup3329 Рік тому +41

    I didn't fall for the "bad play". Population at NL10 would not have floated on the turn with KQo.

  • @superpasi7315
    @superpasi7315 Рік тому +16

    i feel like the primery difference is the cost of one big blind but maybe thats just me idk

  • @jordanconnor1223
    @jordanconnor1223 Рік тому +6

    you got me i was laughing until you showed the prank

  • @Tobi-pn2xs
    @Tobi-pn2xs Рік тому +5

    Awesome intro!
    Edit: had to look back to see that you just mixed up the letters in their names. Hard to pay attention to 10NL player names

  • @joshuamanley6721
    @joshuamanley6721 Рік тому +3

    Always excited to see a new video. This channel is awesome!

  • @jlaux7
    @jlaux7 11 місяців тому +7

    2:19 Interesting point about Stefan deviating from theory -- Magnus Carlsen does this as well in chess. He tends to deviate from the game tree in order to throw his opponents off.

  • @gorydays28
    @gorydays28 Рік тому +3

    Lol great beginning to the vid

  • @ItsBeausy
    @ItsBeausy Рік тому +1

    Playing heads up in nl10 is crazy😭

  • @2332Stephen
    @2332Stephen Рік тому

    I love when people float drawing dead. It just makes me feel ooey gooey inside.

  • @danielgarciajulliard7560
    @danielgarciajulliard7560 Рік тому +1

    What about the db ai river ? Is it Because Linus doesn't bluff Q-x that much while it's a big part of the SDV hands type Aq, Kq Steffen could have ? And that now Linus would X back a lot his underpairs ? What would Steff bluff here ? Turning As-x into a bluff like Ak-Aj, At, A2, A5 ? Also donking missed FD ?

    • @2CardConfidence
      @2CardConfidence  Рік тому +1

      Actually, the river donk is not happening in the solver. Because Linus would have too many bluffs which would barrel (and even a lot of low pairs would bet for thin value).
      But yeah, if you wanted to implement a bluffing range on the river, choosing the hands you mentioned sounds reasonable

  • @zxcdeaddeamon4678
    @zxcdeaddeamon4678 11 місяців тому

    Insanely good vids man! Keep it up! Any dates on the course? :)

    • @2CardConfidence
      @2CardConfidence  11 місяців тому

      Thanks man! :)
      It's right around the corner! Shouldn't be more than 2 weeks from now

  • @matmindsjj
    @matmindsjj 10 місяців тому

    awesome channel btw, love your videos

  • @peter4339
    @peter4339 Рік тому +3

    what about the river donk?

    • @2CardConfidence
      @2CardConfidence  Рік тому +2

      Not a thing according to this simulation, his complete range would be a check. I put everything that didn't fit into the video in the pinned comment

  • @Procastinatestoomuch
    @Procastinatestoomuch Рік тому

    Wow, really well said and put together video.

  • @dommmmm7544
    @dommmmm7544 8 місяців тому +1

    How much would cost you rating my plays? Or me playing vs you for idk.. hour and next hour we discuss

    • @2CardConfidence
      @2CardConfidence  8 місяців тому

      Hey man, can you contact me at info@2cardconfidence.com or discord '2cardconfidence'? :)

  • @chewsday5919
    @chewsday5919 11 місяців тому

    Love the content man❤

  • @fernandesl
    @fernandesl 6 місяців тому

    This is the channel that makes me feel the most stupid on all UA-cam

  • @jeffk3746
    @jeffk3746 Рік тому +1

    As a sticky player myself I don’t mind Stefan’s play until the donk jam. It’s just so hard to be balanced there while keeping a strong X raise range

  • @antihackerify
    @antihackerify Рік тому +4

    I think a lot of those really high stakes players arent that better than a good nl1k player, i think they just had more time to get a bankroll and probably some luck involved as well, to move up from nl1k is really hard, there arent many tables above that, and even if you are really good, to get to nl100k, it would take at least 3 or 4 years with a good winrate .

    • @florianwo1902
      @florianwo1902 Рік тому

      yeah that for sure is very very wrong lot of players play with stakers anyways and their winrate determines the stakes the get to play and naturally over time the best will gather in the highest of stakes

  • @javison_4
    @javison_4 10 місяців тому

    very interesting

  • @rgee5952
    @rgee5952 Рік тому

    mind BLOWN when flipped the script on me

  • @deathbymonkeys
    @deathbymonkeys Рік тому

    lmao great way keeping us off balance hahahah very well done

  • @hereweareagain.4463
    @hereweareagain.4463 Рік тому

    Yo, 2CC, can you please tell me the same of the intro song you used in your RedBaron end boss video?

    • @2CardConfidence
      @2CardConfidence  Рік тому

      Hey man, sorry wanted to answer you, but forgot. It's called "extreme action" from the site bensound.com

    • @hereweareagain.4463
      @hereweareagain.4463 Рік тому

      np. thanks alot!@@2CardConfidence

  • @franciscodelpozobaluarte5907

    Great plot twist

  • @d0zeboy
    @d0zeboy Рік тому

    GTO solvers are the new dogma of poker

    • @CrimzinEclipse2010
      @CrimzinEclipse2010 11 місяців тому

      Solvers and GTO in general are useful to study the theory, but they’re mostly useful when playing against other mathematically sound opponents.
      If you tried to use the “best GTO plays” against average opponents in 90% of lower stakes games, without adjusting to how they play, you’re profitability will go out the window.

  • @pudelinocacalat2951
    @pudelinocacalat2951 Рік тому +2

    Stefan is always losing these hands

  • @samirabdo8210
    @samirabdo8210 11 місяців тому

    i think that also what really matters its your bank accountig but i guess you are not ready for this conversation

  • @kokozy721
    @kokozy721 10 місяців тому

    Is he real Linus? He is Korean reg player. Linus uses his name. Here is the link

    • @2CardConfidence
      @2CardConfidence  10 місяців тому

      Linus uses his real name on GGPoker. On pokerstars he's LLinusLLove

  • @seblind132
    @seblind132 Рік тому

    Best video so far!

  • @OGRE_HATES_NERDS
    @OGRE_HATES_NERDS Рік тому

    you have same accent as dr strangelove

  • @stevenkleiboer9564
    @stevenkleiboer9564 11 місяців тому

    I loved llinus love.. but buttonclicker is also a great endboss

    • @stevenkleiboer9564
      @stevenkleiboer9564 11 місяців тому

      Thanks for the heart you know wilhasha too.. always watched the higher stakes... its a great educational video.
      Nothing like ive ever seen before

  • @symeonalexandridis9081
    @symeonalexandridis9081 11 місяців тому

    I am sorry. I don’t think Stefan is an endboss

  • @santaclause3487
    @santaclause3487 Рік тому +1

    If these dudes do something it’s probably solver approved. They probably use one while playing.

    • @michealjaymurphy
      @michealjaymurphy Рік тому +1

      well these videos are really just estimates anyways no one knows linus and stephans ranges in every spot

    • @2CardConfidence
      @2CardConfidence  Рік тому

      Agree with Michael. Also the river jam isn't solver approved and neither are the lines from the first hand, so not a convincing argument for RTA use

    • @YoyoDevo
      @YoyoDevo Рік тому

      the whole video is showing that they didn't do what the solver said. I don't know how you came to this conclusion.

  • @justshowup6207
    @justshowup6207 Рік тому

    There's no justification for this play, just bad and that's it. Find me hand where he floats this this spot with shit draw and dnks river when it misses to prove otherwise. Case closed.

  • @SultanOfSwings
    @SultanOfSwings Рік тому +1

    lfg

  • @marekkawalec8581
    @marekkawalec8581 11 місяців тому

    It is a terrible play anyways

  • @Samuel88853
    @Samuel88853 11 місяців тому

    Who plays HU anyway. only egomaniacs. poker is meant to be played multiway

  • @LapesFame
    @LapesFame Рік тому

    Bro it’s one hand.. hu they are not thinking this deep. It’s all instinct. STOP. Especially in 15 seconds

    • @2CardConfidence
      @2CardConfidence  Рік тому +1

      And instinct is built from practical and theoretical experience

  • @user-ov2pe8wj6h
    @user-ov2pe8wj6h Рік тому +1

  • @Dyl3423
    @Dyl3423 Рік тому

    No river breakdown?🥲

    • @2CardConfidence
      @2CardConfidence  Рік тому +1

      Sorry, didn't really fit the video 🙃 I put the missing solver outputs in the pinned comment

  • @hansmuller5879
    @hansmuller5879 11 місяців тому +1

    Solvers are bullshit anyways. Poker became boring because of solvers. I never used solvers and still 100% or more on every Site i play. Intuition is the key.