Men are also much louder environmentalist protesters, and created the science behind renewable energy and sustainable development. Where's the "toxic femininity about the ecosystem" for women like Taylor Swift who produce more of a carbon footprint in a single day than most people do in their lifetime? Men are more likely to pick up garbage, too, considering most garbage people are MEN. Fast fashion is also a significant contributor to environmental degradation and unethical treatments of worker and sweatshops and guess who the perpetrators of that are? Women. Specifically gen z and millenial white women from the western hemisphere.
Not sure of your point? Most programmers are male, too. That doesn't stop sports from being part of hyper masculinity. It just means there's both a nerd/geek masculine culture and a jock one. In that same vein, as someone in Texas, I can guarantee you that extended cab truck ownership and people who have converted electric cars are both mostly male populations due to different forms of masculine identity.
It makes me wonder if more men own EVs in the UK because men can make more money - that women may wish they could own EVs, but have to make do with used gas cars. Similarly, men typically commute only to and from work, whereas women have school pickup, after school classes, errands, and work. And so a bike might be much less viable for a women's life than for a man with a simple commute. Also, there haven't been any large capacity EVs that can carry two kids and their friends. At least few that can compete with gas minivans.
@mckennakills72 At an national level, cycling 🚲 infrastructure is abysmal in the UK 🇬🇧 and in many of its former colonies - especially the US 🇺🇸 & Australia 🇦🇺. That more men cycle in these countries is not a gender thing, per se, but is an indication that the cycling infra & cycling culture is poor & that car culture is dominant. Very generally speaking, women are more safety conscious & and risk-averse than men. When you see large numbers of women & younger children cycling 🚲 for transportation, that is an indication that you have a healthy cycling culture & good cycling infrastructure. Prime examples of this are Denmark 🇩🇰 & the Netherlands 🇳🇱.
Every time I hear some stupid combination of words that serves as a substitute for an argument and as a consolation for the thought block in the head of a stupid lefty, I play a game with myself trying to crack what it could mean. I lose every time because my mind, thank God, is not so "open" that my brain fell out of it.
I think this issue can be looked at through a compassionate lens to optimize the deconstruction of masculinity and earth-stifling behaviors. Its actually because men have been forced to suppress feelings of sadness and responsibility for something greater than their own survival in a hypermasculine (sometimes referred to as ‘toxic’ which perpetuates the behaviors, so stop using that term) world that these issues exist. The solution is beyond the recognition of this issue: how to we engage men in a way thats accessible? Not all men are the ‘powerful misogynists’ that people make them into (like a boogeyman, which is unhelpful and actually contributes to the issue).
Great. Now do a video on toxic femininity and its connection to environmental degradation. Fast fashion pollution was started by women and continues to rise as more women and girls encourage the unethical usage of clothes in honor of "trends". We can also encourage more women to contribute to sustainable development knowledge and renewable technology innovation since men have paved the way for such scientific breakthroughs. But making the garbage cleanup workers gender equal would be a start, too.
@@kikijewell2967even if it is whataboutism, y’all try to tie masculinity to every problem, when things like fast fashion are clearly consumed by woman.
@@kikijewell2967Although his argument may be in bad faith, this argument is technically correct, woman and teenage girls make up a large portion of the demographics that buy fast fashion, most of which end up in land fills in third world countries. We need to do better, not as men, and not as woman, but as humans to fix this ongoing climate change issue
@kikijewell2967 It is not whataboutism if it's about protecting the environment and saving the planet. Toxic feminine behaviors are destroying the planet. Your comment is part of the problem. You would rather attack masculinity rather than save the planet. Your comment is an example of toxic femininity.
It's still masculinity, actually. I mean, a large chunk of fast fashion brands are actually run by men and the first formal fashion designer was actually a man. And this "fashion=feminine" narrative is still a product of masculinity/patriarchy trying to enforce gender roles on people, especially women and brands(again owned by men) cash in on this by targeting that demographic. Also, it is true that being environmentally friendly is seen as feminine and that's the reason why some eco-friendly brands still have to "masculinize"(ex. no soft colors, angular shapes, masculine(?) words like "rush" or "adventure") their packaging in order to cater to men.
Personally, I think it has more so to do with people viewing compassion and sensitivity as feminine. Male vegetarians are often viewed as effeminate because they care about animals, so I guess it’s viewed the same as being compassionate towards the planet.
And no one is viewing compassion as feminine. That is a complete strawman. But real men don’t bow down to your fascist version of „compassion“. I won‘t let y‘all dictate me how to travel and what to eat.
Another aspect is that dominating the land is like doninating women. So it is very much tied to seeing women/nature as inferior, to violently bring into cowering submission. So breakdown of the climate is a sign of _success_ in these terms.
@@alementary4065 it's men who are having a loneliness epidemic, not women. And it's this desire to dominate and control that's at the core of that. Women aren't having it anymore. Edit: to be clear, _you're projecting._
You really should watch Penn and Teller. Recycling takes more energy than not doing so. Recycling is actually the toxic behavior. And climate isn't determined by CO2. It's determined by location on the planet relative to the sun. Florida doesn't worry about blizzards, and Montana doesn't worry about hurricanes. (that's latitude) California at sea level usually doesn't get snow. California in the mountains does. (that's altitude) Btw, we only produce 4% of the total volume of CO2. The earth produces 96%. Lowering our emissions won't change climate because CO2 doesn't determine it and we don't produce enough to make any difference whatsoever in temps. Also, a 2 deg. difference up or down doesn't change the climate either. In Iowa, we have a temperate climate. A 2 deg. fluctuation is natural variability.
What increased our lifespans was better sanitation and vaccines. We have many more children surviving into adulthood. Has nothing to do with Industrial Revolution.
Most guys in the US tie thier masculinity to their cars and guns especially how loud they are its not a stretch to see the correlation between toxic masculinity & toxic fumes
Do you know most men, is this something your gender studies professor told you, or did you just pull this out of your butt? I suspect the latter two. 😂😂
@@deathlytree434 What a cheap copout. A bad argument does not equal fragile masculinity. Maybe masculinity is a threat to your fragile femininity, which is far more likely. Leftism is nothing more than projection, after all.
An electric truck cannot tow, haul, plow, or do most other work related truck activities. As the range on a ehummer is 35 miles with a load... I guess it could be a farm truck... but then it's 110,000 plus an ev hookup as opposed to a 1000 dollar unregistered beater with gas he already uses for his tractors... speaking of. E tractor? Also... where are the e semis? I'm not saying families and commuters shouldn't drive responsibly... but if being unable to work, or afford to work, is somehow displaying my fragile masculinity, then I'd say you've got me pegged.
it's bad culture of political debate. both sides try to discredit the other by inventing new terms. you don't have to laugh here. you are right but the people you support are not better.
@@SomeKidFromBritain I agree. Culture should have no place in politics, only rationality (including science of course) and pragmatism. Unfortunately, with the USSR, atheism was also weakened globally and the previously clear boundaries between state and religion are disappearing. Nationalism and preservation of traditions (with the goal to keep social cohesion and prosperity of the BROAD masses - which clumsily result in national socialism) are countermoves to globalization, diversity and meritocracy. Neither side brings a better world, just a different one. And the debate is predominantly conducted ideologically and unobjectively.
We're in Michigan, and my husband bought a Rivian back in March. We use canvas bags for groceries and for fruits and veggies. We just got solar put on our house, and eventually we'll get a second electric vehicle for me. My husband has no issues with doing what is right to reduce our carbon footprint. We grow our own veggies in the summer too. I really wish more people would care about doing what is right. There is nothing wrong with caring about the environment. It's about saving humanity, as the planet will be here long after we're gone. Without humans, the planet will heal itself and hopefully get better. But while humans are on this planet, we NEED to take better care of it for the sake of humanity.
@CanadianRose Your virtue signaling. It's both hilarious and repellent. Your EVs have a higher carbon footprint than an ICE vehicle over its lifetime, and you're also contributing to child slavery in the places where the cobalt, nickel, lithium, etc. are mined, not to mention the devastation the mining itself entails. But you thought you were soooo virtuous, dintcha? And what happens to those solar panels when they go bad and have to be replaced? Toxic metals in your water supply, anyone? Not to mention the ever expanding mountains of non-recyclable trash. And don't get me started on wind power...a wind turbine will never generate enough electricity to compensate for what it took to make, and the blades are 100% non-recyclable. But do go on thinking you're doing something good for the planet, when in reality you're as bad or worse than Halliburton on an individual level. Good on you for the canvas bags and gardening, though.
Must be nice to be able afford one of those Revians and have your own property to plant veggies and install solar panels Also, is it really for the sake of humanity when you limit access to cheap and reliable energy? Like, what happen after Trudeau denied exporting natural gas to Japan and Germany?
I live in the first city to implement residential curbside recycling. 94% of everything we recycled in this program went to the landfill. The perception recycling is saving the environment is no different than the perception men who dont recycle are toxic
This makes sense in some ways and in certain areas of the US especially. Here I believe it has to do with interests and Mysoginist thought process, male & female. It has to go! This is an important topic. ✌
Um, no, this makes no sense in the slightest. This is a futile attempt to sound intellectual and was a miserable failure. What this person just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in this rambling, incoherent statement was there even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone who watches this video will be dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.
This is a very interesting topic, and I'm glad to see it discussed. Speaking of disgust, can you either clean your fingernails or just keep them out of the frame? Much support to your direction and purpose, but that is really gross.
Lool so you identified the connection between the improved quality of life that harnessing fossil fuels facilitated and the fact that said improvement was largely conceived and executed by men. So now men's unwillingness to regress to a lesser quality of life is a defense of masculinity, rather than just a stupid idea? For the avoidance of doubt, please educate us as to which other "form of modern industrial society" there is, aside from the one built on fossil fuels? I won't hold my breath.
Women like this don't know how the world works. Seriously, they have NO IDEA what it takes for the modern world to be what it is. They don't know what it takes to make a car, let alone produce millions. You think she knows what's behind the building of a plane? Or a cargo ship? She probably has never thought of what it takes to build the camera she uses. Or the sheer amount of machinery it takes to building housing for the millions of people that need it. That woman never once stopped talking for a second and thought about the fact that before the industrial age people lived until 50. She thinks live can just be sitting on a garden and talk about her feelings. It's hilarious because at the end feminism went to such extreme efforts to get away from the traditional female role of being a dumb girl whose heart desires things while the men take care of things and she ended up in the same spot. Talking about things she has no idea about, fantasizing about a fictitious society, no concept of how things work while the men are out there making it all happen.
When renewables replace fossile fules (i.e. solar, wind, tidal, nuclear), of which men will contune to make up the majority of the workforce in those industries, are we going to continue making up terms like "sustainamasculinity" or "renewamasculinity"
Never mind "renewables" are anything but renewable. Oil is actually a-biotic and is truly renewable because it's manufactured by the planet - it doesn't come from fossils. It's found deeper in the ocean than any fossil has ever been.
@@abraxasjinx5207 it’s possible that was sarcasm, it’s really hard to tell whether the original comment or was actually saying this person is amazing or just recognizing how ridiculous the video is
Just reminds me of a woman that doesn't have a boyfriend and if she does he dodes on her hand and foot. That sounds more like projecting than anything else.
This is an excellent example of what it means to 1) project guilt, and 2) think too much about a topic that concerns life. Truth: masculine and feminine are both needed to address this issue. Ignore the lies.
Hm. I can see where you'd see it that way. No doubt both men and women are needed for the change. She has a valid point, though. We latch onto different facets of life and make it become who we are. There's truth in the message that the fossil fuel industry taps into men, not women, for ad campaigns. Their demographic is the masculinity graphic, no doubt! Guns, fossil fuel, industry - all evoke images of a man. That's what we've been raised with. It's not a hard stretch to think some males feel threatened by who a part of what they see as who they are and what they represent when talking about climate change. She was just highlighting one part of the problem, not all. For instance she could have talked about the fast fashion industry, which targets women hard-core. Lack of bringing up all the issues for climate change in this short video shouldn't equate to her trying cover up.
Is this really what the world is coming to? Seriously who gives a $h!t! Let people act how they want and think what they want. We don’t all have to be exactly the same. I recycle. But if my buddy doesn’t want to recycle because he thinks it’s feminine then ok that’s fine he’s allowed to think and feel that way.
@@samvsmedia8680 Don't take it from me - there's a lot written about this topic! The S*xual Politics of Meat: A Feminist-Vegetarian Critical Theory by Carol J Adams is a good one.
Especially when you consider how overconsumption is a huge factor to environmental degradation. Guess who perpetuates that the most? Women. Fast fashion and women being 70-80% of all capitalist consumers seems to evade these videos.
In the UK 76% of EV owners are men. Men also have much higher cycling rates.
Men are also much louder environmentalist protesters, and created the science behind renewable energy and sustainable development. Where's the "toxic femininity about the ecosystem" for women like Taylor Swift who produce more of a carbon footprint in a single day than most people do in their lifetime? Men are more likely to pick up garbage, too, considering most garbage people are MEN.
Fast fashion is also a significant contributor to environmental degradation and unethical treatments of worker and sweatshops and guess who the perpetrators of that are? Women. Specifically gen z and millenial white women from the western hemisphere.
Not sure of your point? Most programmers are male, too. That doesn't stop sports from being part of hyper masculinity. It just means there's both a nerd/geek masculine culture and a jock one. In that same vein, as someone in Texas, I can guarantee you that extended cab truck ownership and people who have converted electric cars are both mostly male populations due to different forms of masculine identity.
It makes me wonder if more men own EVs in the UK because men can make more money - that women may wish they could own EVs, but have to make do with used gas cars.
Similarly, men typically commute only to and from work, whereas women have school pickup, after school classes, errands, and work. And so a bike might be much less viable for a women's life than for a man with a simple commute.
Also, there haven't been any large capacity EVs that can carry two kids and their friends. At least few that can compete with gas minivans.
@mckennakills72
At an national level, cycling 🚲 infrastructure is abysmal in the UK 🇬🇧 and in many of its former colonies - especially the US 🇺🇸 & Australia 🇦🇺. That more men cycle in these countries is not a gender thing, per se, but is an indication that the cycling infra & cycling culture is poor & that car culture is dominant.
Very generally speaking, women are more safety conscious & and risk-averse than men. When you see large numbers of women & younger children cycling 🚲 for transportation, that is an indication that you have a healthy cycling culture & good cycling infrastructure. Prime examples of this are Denmark 🇩🇰 & the Netherlands 🇳🇱.
🎉qw
Every time I hear some stupid combination of words that serves as a substitute for an argument and as a consolation for the thought block in the head of a stupid lefty, I play a game with myself trying to crack what it could mean. I lose every time because my mind, thank God, is not so "open" that my brain fell out of it.
You’re one of those million dollar cowboys… You’ll get a DM if you paste your credit score.
I think this issue can be looked at through a compassionate lens to optimize the deconstruction of masculinity and earth-stifling behaviors. Its actually because men have been forced to suppress feelings of sadness and responsibility for something greater than their own survival in a hypermasculine (sometimes referred to as ‘toxic’ which perpetuates the behaviors, so stop using that term) world that these issues exist. The solution is beyond the recognition of this issue: how to we engage men in a way thats accessible? Not all men are the ‘powerful misogynists’ that people make them into (like a boogeyman, which is unhelpful and actually contributes to the issue).
I swear people make up issues that don’t exist
Great. Now do a video on toxic femininity and its connection to environmental degradation. Fast fashion pollution was started by women and continues to rise as more women and girls encourage the unethical usage of clothes in honor of "trends". We can also encourage more women to contribute to sustainable development knowledge and renewable technology innovation since men have paved the way for such scientific breakthroughs. But making the garbage cleanup workers gender equal would be a start, too.
"Whataboutism"
@@kikijewell2967even if it is whataboutism, y’all try to tie masculinity to every problem, when things like fast fashion are clearly consumed by woman.
@@kikijewell2967Although his argument may be in bad faith, this argument is technically correct, woman and teenage girls make up a large portion of the demographics that buy fast fashion, most of which end up in land fills in third world countries. We need to do better, not as men, and not as woman, but as humans to fix this ongoing climate change issue
@kikijewell2967
It is not whataboutism if it's about protecting the environment and saving the planet.
Toxic feminine behaviors are destroying the planet. Your comment is part of the problem. You would rather attack masculinity rather than save the planet. Your comment is an example of toxic femininity.
It's still masculinity, actually.
I mean, a large chunk of fast fashion brands are actually run by men and the first formal fashion designer was actually a man.
And this "fashion=feminine" narrative is still a product of masculinity/patriarchy trying to enforce gender roles on people, especially women and brands(again owned by men) cash in on this by targeting that demographic.
Also, it is true that being environmentally friendly is seen as feminine and that's the reason why some eco-friendly brands still have to "masculinize"(ex. no soft colors, angular shapes, masculine(?) words like "rush" or "adventure") their packaging in order to cater to men.
Personally, I think it has more so to do with people viewing compassion and sensitivity as feminine. Male vegetarians are often viewed as effeminate because they care about animals, so I guess it’s viewed the same as being compassionate towards the planet.
Vegetariarians and vegans do NOT care about animals. We are omnivores
And no one is viewing compassion as feminine. That is a complete strawman. But real men don’t bow down to your fascist version of „compassion“. I won‘t let y‘all dictate me how to travel and what to eat.
Drill baby drill...? Michael Steel, but also Sarah Palin.
Another aspect is that dominating the land is like doninating women. So it is very much tied to seeing women/nature as inferior, to violently bring into cowering submission.
So breakdown of the climate is a sign of _success_ in these terms.
Couldn't get a date, huh? 😂😂😂
@@alementary4065 it's men who are having a loneliness epidemic, not women. And it's this desire to dominate and control that's at the core of that. Women aren't having it anymore.
Edit: to be clear, _you're projecting._
Don't skip your meds
@@j.7701 get off your drugs.
@@kikijewell2967 I live in reality, you live in a fantasy land.
You really should watch Penn and Teller. Recycling takes more energy than not doing so. Recycling is actually the toxic behavior. And climate isn't determined by CO2. It's determined by location on the planet relative to the sun. Florida doesn't worry about blizzards, and Montana doesn't worry about hurricanes. (that's latitude) California at sea level usually doesn't get snow. California in the mountains does. (that's altitude) Btw, we only produce 4% of the total volume of CO2. The earth produces 96%. Lowering our emissions won't change climate because CO2 doesn't determine it and we don't produce enough to make any difference whatsoever in temps. Also, a 2 deg. difference up or down doesn't change the climate either. In Iowa, we have a temperate climate. A 2 deg. fluctuation is natural variability.
Maybe it's because fuel-burning built industrial civilization and increased our average lifespan from 35 to 79....
What increased our lifespans was better sanitation and vaccines. We have many more children surviving into adulthood. Has nothing to do with Industrial Revolution.
That was then. This is now.
@@tomdonahoe3539sounds like there is a statue that needs taking down somewhere
Most guys in the US tie thier masculinity to their cars and guns especially how loud they are its not a stretch to see the correlation between toxic masculinity & toxic fumes
Do you know most men, is this something your gender studies professor told you, or did you just pull this out of your butt? I suspect the latter two. 😂😂
That is a stupid opinion. Most guys will agree with me.
@j.7701 if its just an opinion then what do you care? Not my fault their masculinity is so fragile
@@deathlytree434 What a cheap copout. A bad argument does not equal fragile masculinity. Maybe masculinity is a threat to your fragile femininity, which is far more likely. Leftism is nothing more than projection, after all.
@@deathlytree434 there is no "if" it is just your opinion.
i feel dumb for even watching this.
Love this video! 😂 Btw are you guys looking for editors ?
I would message them directly if you are serious
Suppose I „suffer“ from „petro-masculinity“😂
An electric truck cannot tow, haul, plow, or do most other work related truck activities. As the range on a ehummer is 35 miles with a load... I guess it could be a farm truck... but then it's 110,000 plus an ev hookup as opposed to a 1000 dollar unregistered beater with gas he already uses for his tractors... speaking of. E tractor? Also... where are the e semis? I'm not saying families and commuters shouldn't drive responsibly... but if being unable to work, or afford to work, is somehow displaying my fragile masculinity, then I'd say you've got me pegged.
PETRO MASCULINITY
😂😂😂😂😂😂
it's bad culture of political debate. both sides try to discredit the other by inventing new terms. you don't have to laugh here. you are right but the people you support are not better.
@@santaclaus0815 I condemn the cultural nonsense coming from either side of the climate debate.
@@SomeKidFromBritain I agree. Culture should have no place in politics, only rationality (including science of course) and pragmatism. Unfortunately, with the USSR, atheism was also weakened globally and the previously clear boundaries between state and religion are disappearing. Nationalism and preservation of traditions (with the goal to keep social cohesion and prosperity of the BROAD masses - which clumsily result in national socialism) are countermoves to globalization, diversity and meritocracy.
Neither side brings a better world, just a different one. And the debate is predominantly conducted ideologically and unobjectively.
We're in Michigan, and my husband bought a Rivian back in March. We use canvas bags for groceries and for fruits and veggies. We just got solar put on our house, and eventually we'll get a second electric vehicle for me. My husband has no issues with doing what is right to reduce our carbon footprint. We grow our own veggies in the summer too. I really wish more people would care about doing what is right. There is nothing wrong with caring about the environment. It's about saving humanity, as the planet will be here long after we're gone. Without humans, the planet will heal itself and hopefully get better. But while humans are on this planet, we NEED to take better care of it for the sake of humanity.
😅😅😅😅
@@alementary4065 And why do you find what I said funny?
@CanadianRose Your virtue signaling. It's both hilarious and repellent. Your EVs have a higher carbon footprint than an ICE vehicle over its lifetime, and you're also contributing to child slavery in the places where the cobalt, nickel, lithium, etc. are mined, not to mention the devastation the mining itself entails. But you thought you were soooo virtuous, dintcha? And what happens to those solar panels when they go bad and have to be replaced? Toxic metals in your water supply, anyone? Not to mention the ever expanding mountains of non-recyclable trash. And don't get me started on wind power...a wind turbine will never generate enough electricity to compensate for what it took to make, and the blades are 100% non-recyclable. But do go on thinking you're doing something good for the planet, when in reality you're as bad or worse than Halliburton on an individual level. Good on you for the canvas bags and gardening, though.
Must be nice to be able afford one of those Revians and have your own property to plant veggies and install solar panels
Also, is it really for the sake of humanity when you limit access to cheap and reliable energy? Like, what happen after Trudeau denied exporting natural gas to Japan and Germany?
I live in the first city to implement residential curbside recycling. 94% of everything we recycled in this program went to the landfill. The perception recycling is saving the environment is no different than the perception men who dont recycle are toxic
This makes sense in some ways and in certain areas of the US especially. Here I believe it has to do with interests and Mysoginist thought process, male & female. It has to go!
This is an important topic. ✌
And uh, not a joke, doctors help you live, but nurses make you want to live, if there is anyone in heaven, it’s nurses, male and female!
Um, no, this makes no sense in the slightest. This is a futile attempt to sound intellectual and was a miserable failure. What this person just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in this rambling, incoherent statement was there even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone who watches this video will be dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.
@@dcttd8022whut.
Oh man im so happy i found this channel 😂
A bunch of dudes in raised white trucks are on their way to protest you right now.
Pahhahaha! Indeed!
@kioloup
And they're probably all modified to "roll coal". 😊
This is a very interesting topic, and I'm glad to see it discussed. Speaking of disgust, can you either clean your fingernails or just keep them out of the frame? Much support to your direction and purpose, but that is really gross.
I didn't even notice. That's definitely a _you_ problem.
@@danidejaneiro8378pay attention
Lool so you identified the connection between the improved quality of life that harnessing fossil fuels facilitated and the fact that said improvement was largely conceived and executed by men. So now men's unwillingness to regress to a lesser quality of life is a defense of masculinity, rather than just a stupid idea?
For the avoidance of doubt, please educate us as to which other "form of modern industrial society" there is, aside from the one built on fossil fuels? I won't hold my breath.
Women like this don't know how the world works. Seriously, they have NO IDEA what it takes for the modern world to be what it is. They don't know what it takes to make a car, let alone produce millions. You think she knows what's behind the building of a plane? Or a cargo ship? She probably has never thought of what it takes to build the camera she uses. Or the sheer amount of machinery it takes to building housing for the millions of people that need it.
That woman never once stopped talking for a second and thought about the fact that before the industrial age people lived until 50. She thinks live can just be sitting on a garden and talk about her feelings.
It's hilarious because at the end feminism went to such extreme efforts to get away from the traditional female role of being a dumb girl whose heart desires things while the men take care of things and she ended up in the same spot. Talking about things she has no idea about, fantasizing about a fictitious society, no concept of how things work while the men are out there making it all happen.
I bought a light-saber today
Really interesting.
When renewables replace fossile fules (i.e. solar, wind, tidal, nuclear), of which men will contune to make up the majority of the workforce in those industries, are we going to continue making up terms like "sustainamasculinity" or "renewamasculinity"
Never mind "renewables" are anything but renewable. Oil is actually a-biotic and is truly renewable because it's manufactured by the planet - it doesn't come from fossils. It's found deeper in the ocean than any fossil has ever been.
The insanity of this channel never ceases to entertain and amaze me.
Powerful
Interesting. I know auto racing attracts way more men than women.
＞気候変動とは、化石燃料の燃焼をはじめとした人間の活動を主な要因とする、気温と気象 パターンの長期的なシフトを指します。
化石燃料を燃やすと空中に粉塵が蔓延して太陽光を遮断するため地表温度が下降する。排ガス規制をすればするほど
空気がきれいになり温度は上昇する。温度の上昇は２０世紀の大気汚染を改善した結果でしかないわけだろ。
この当たり前の話を理解できないって国連は知性のかけらもないよな。
Nonsense!
Academia is a parody of its former self.
So happy to see this collab with the AMAZING Emily Atkins 👏👏👏
Do you know her? Can you talk to her about her fingernail hygiene? And once she gives them a good wash, give her a high five from me.
@@abraxasjinx5207 it’s possible that was sarcasm, it’s really hard to tell whether the original comment or was actually saying this person is amazing or just recognizing how ridiculous the video is
Is this related to the big truck to compensate for ya know 😜😂
Just reminds me of a woman that doesn't have a boyfriend and if she does he dodes on her hand and foot. That sounds more like projecting than anything else.
This is an excellent example of what it means to 1) project guilt, and 2) think too much about a topic that concerns life.
Truth: masculine and feminine are both needed to address this issue.
Ignore the lies.
Hm. I can see where you'd see it that way. No doubt both men and women are needed for the change. She has a valid point, though. We latch onto different facets of life and make it become who we are. There's truth in the message that the fossil fuel industry taps into men, not women, for ad campaigns. Their demographic is the masculinity graphic, no doubt!
Guns, fossil fuel, industry - all evoke images of a man. That's what we've been raised with. It's not a hard stretch to think some males feel threatened by who a part of what they see as who they are and what they represent when talking about climate change.
She was just highlighting one part of the problem, not all. For instance she could have talked about the fast fashion industry, which targets women hard-core. Lack of bringing up all the issues for climate change in this short video shouldn't equate to her trying cover up.
Thank petro masculinity for allowing me the conveniences of the modern age.
It saved the whales, that's for sure.
Is this really what the world is coming to? Seriously who gives a $h!t! Let people act how they want and think what they want. We don’t all have to be exactly the same. I recycle. But if my buddy doesn’t want to recycle because he thinks it’s feminine then ok that’s fine he’s allowed to think and feel that way.
😂😂😂😂 theres not a sane person on earth who wont just laugh at this. You are so out of touch with reality
And the obsession with meat being a thing real men do! We live in a meat centered society
Not sure it's a men thing, just people who want to be strong eat protien.
@@samvsmedia8680 Don't take it from me - there's a lot written about this topic! The S*xual Politics of Meat: A Feminist-Vegetarian Critical Theory by Carol J Adams is a good one.
@@TG8.No such thing. Meat is good for us. Sugar and wheat are the problem, not meat. Stop eating junk food, vegan or not
Lets get real here. This is a bit of a stretch.
Especially when you consider how overconsumption is a huge factor to environmental degradation. Guess who perpetuates that the most? Women. Fast fashion and women being 70-80% of all capitalist consumers seems to evade these videos.
It's not just a stretch...it's infantile feminist nonsense (redundant, I know). Like pretty much everything else they say.
You really have to laugh at america sometimes
*NO FATHER FIGURE DETECTED*
And this also applies to guys that cant have fun unless they are burning petro fuels. Rolling coal is the worst example.
What a freak
You people just make stuff up, don't you? 😂😂😂
Thank you for demonstrating that this is all a joke.
No real problem, so it does not need a solution.
This a dude
You are totally lost.