An integrative review is supposed to be inclusive and not exclusive. So, excluding a study as sensitivity analysis is not needed or recommended. Instead, if you find a study to be very different from the others, you can discuss it rather than conduct a sensitivity analysis. If you conduct a qualitative synthesis, it is still possible to conduct a sensitivity analysis. Here are some approaches: - Varying Inclusion Criteria: Test how including or excluding certain studies impacts your synthesis. - Different Analytical Methods: Compare results using different qualitative analysis techniques. - Subgroup Analysis: Examine specific subgroups within your data to see if findings hold across different contexts. - Quality Assessment: Assess the impact of including only high-quality studies versus all studies.
@@SystematicReview Thank you so much for your reply, it is really helpful. Can you please mention specific techniques or examples for Different Analytical Methods to compare the results of the eligible studies? Or, for subgroup analysis, can we make groups of the studies based on random criteria (for example studies analysing land versus studied analysing sea ecosystems) and then create dummy variables in an Excel and apply tests like chi square or relevant? Please, your help is valuable.
@@anastasiagkargkavouzi5379 Thematic Analysis, Grounded Theory, Content Analysis, Narrative Synthesis, and Framework Analysis are some qualitative analysis techniques that can provide a deeper or different understanding of your data and ensure the robustness of your findings.
@@SystematicReview for subgroup analysis, can we make groups of the studies based on random criteria (for example studies analysing land versus studied analysing sea ecosystems) and then create dummy variables in an Excel and apply tests like chi square or relevant? Please, your help is valuable.
@@SystematicReview for subgroup analysis, can we make groups of the studies based on random criteria (for example studies analysing land versus studied analysing sea ecosystems) and then create dummy variables in an Excel and apply tests like chi square or relevant? Please, your help is valuable.
Can you explain a bit more? Do you need to know why there are duplicate records when running searches for Systematic Review or why we should remove duplicates?
You saved me. I will pray for you ❤. Thank you so much for posting this tutorial. I’m waiting for a tutorial on new version of rayyan
@rightventricle5147 Thank you for your positive feedback. We will certainly create a tutorial on the new version. We're glad you found it useful.
How do we perform a Sensitivity analysis in an integrative review(not meta-analysis included) if it is qualitative in nature?
An integrative review is supposed to be inclusive and not exclusive. So, excluding a study as sensitivity analysis is not needed or recommended. Instead, if you find a study to be very different from the others, you can discuss it rather than conduct a sensitivity analysis.
If you conduct a qualitative synthesis, it is still possible to conduct a sensitivity analysis. Here are some approaches:
- Varying Inclusion Criteria: Test how including or excluding certain studies impacts your synthesis.
- Different Analytical Methods: Compare results using different qualitative analysis techniques.
- Subgroup Analysis: Examine specific subgroups within your data to see if findings hold across different contexts.
- Quality Assessment: Assess the impact of including only high-quality studies versus all studies.
@@SystematicReview Thank you so much for your reply, it is really helpful. Can you please mention specific techniques or examples for Different Analytical Methods to compare the results of the eligible studies? Or, for subgroup analysis, can we make groups of the studies based on random criteria (for example studies analysing land versus studied analysing sea ecosystems) and then create dummy variables in an Excel and apply tests like chi square or relevant? Please, your help is valuable.
@@anastasiagkargkavouzi5379 Thematic Analysis, Grounded Theory, Content Analysis, Narrative Synthesis, and Framework Analysis are some qualitative analysis techniques that can provide a deeper or different understanding of your data and ensure the robustness of your findings.
@@SystematicReview for subgroup analysis, can we make groups of the studies based on random criteria (for example studies analysing land versus studied analysing sea ecosystems) and then create dummy variables in an Excel and apply tests like chi square or relevant? Please, your help is valuable.
@@SystematicReview for subgroup analysis, can we make groups of the studies based on random criteria (for example studies analysing land versus studied analysing sea ecosystems) and then create dummy variables in an Excel and apply tests like chi square or relevant? Please, your help is valuable.
I can't understand the point of duplicate 😣
Can you explain a bit more? Do you need to know why there are duplicate records when running searches for Systematic Review or why we should remove duplicates?