@@robertlaschever3935 She knew his words were more BS - he went total thug when he didn't get his way, as in, he claimed he was ripped off by rappers so what does he do? he bullies & punches an innocent man who was hired to do a job. Defendant is a big baby, too.
I agree... a guy doesn't wear his working gloves all the way during his break .. to the time he is inside ringing a bell to meet someone .. same goes for the sunglasses. Most people will take them off while answering the door.
Yeah when I would meet my ex at work he’d take them off before even walking in my direction and put them in his pocket or hold them him still wearing them says trouble
He also had a mask. It was down around his neck, but (in my opinion) he did have it in case he needed to cover his face. Especially since the plaintiff did not know what he looked like before.
My husband drives forklifts and he doesn't take off his gloves til hes home and done. But he just likes gloves. He doesn't have to wear then he just does.
The guy is definitely a bully. And the guy with the glasses is the type of guy that would stick his tongue out while standing behind the teacher and go nana nana nana
Actually he seems very gentle and sincere to me, the Defendant. He’s physically stronger than the Plaintiff because the P is a geeky little nerd but that’s just DNA. Normally she would dismiss somebody’s case without evidence but she completely took the Plaintiff’s side just on face value. Judge is horrible.
BTW. I looked up the word *”Kniggits”,* and what I found is that it is from a 1975 Monty Python skit, and it was used as an intentional mispronunciation of the word *”Knight”,* where French soldiers were mocking English knights in broken English. The defendant should’ve taken the time to look it up while he was stalking dude’s FB page. 🤷🏽♀️
But, the defendant said the plaintiff used the word “niglet”, not “kniggits”. The judge even repeats “niglets” when asking him for the meaning and the plaintiff tells her it’s from Monty Python. As you clarify, it is not. I think the judge would’ve liked to have known the truth of the word’s meaning. He should’ve been outed for being the slimy racist he apparently is.
@@earlisanorman3709 He didn't call anybody anything... He cited a direct Monty Python quote on a post asking for people's favourite movie quotes. He never said 'nigglets'. Were you listening at all? The word he said it's exactly as the person says above... It's a comedic mispronunciation of the word 'Knights'. If it was racist toward anyone, it would be French people.
@@heftyelf There’s no way that you can convince a layperson that he was so naive not to know what it could’ve been interpreted as. His smile when he spelled it said it all!!!
@@laquanperez2425 No, his smile was because before the guy started saying what the post said he had no idea what he was talking about... The smile indicated that he finally knew what he was referring to, and that he had a reasonable explanation as to how it came about and how it was misinterpreted. Outside of the US (and I suspect in some pockets inside the US as well), Monty Python is huge... I recognised the line instantly despite the butchered memory of guy who misinterpreted it.
@@JS-uj2yi A speech impediment did not make him write that psychotic email. He’s unbalanced-which is probably why he fantasized he wrote the song in the first place.
Maybe not. Kesha, Dua Lipa Ashanti, Nicki Minaj. This isn't a rare thing in the music industry. Plenty of artists take what sre meant to be samples and pass them off as their music. JLO is notorious for this
This rapper who apparently doesn’t rap for a living, but rather works in construction and can’t afford $750 is so good at rapping that these very rich and successful competitors had to take recordings of his voice and use it illegally, instead of using literally anyone else on the planet to make this song.
You can literally use a fart noise as a sample and loop it into a beat. Famous singers and producers are not estranged to the concept of stealing from the unknown artists because it's much easier to recognize let's say Michael Jackson's voice than Kevin's from the hood.
@@audiodynamixBagzzit’s happened to my family personally… they take people NO ONE KNOWS and steal their entire music… and it comes off like “what makes you special” if u say something or stick up for yourself.. crazy stuff 🤦🏾♀️
12:25 he’s right that’s a quote from Monty python. As a black man I’ve watched that movie when I was a kid, and that is word for word the quote in the movie. The defendant took some liberty’s with his interpretations.
@@courtneycarpenter5283 why do movies have to be for a demographic and not just for the general public? 🤔 I’m so white I’m damn near translucent and I like plenty of your so called “Common Black movies”
I dunno, I think it is more telling that the Defendant's position was "I just went over to apologize and then left" but then later when asked about the laptop/briefcase in his own words he said "I dunno what happened to it, it fell on the ground." If there really was no altercation, why was the briefcase even on the ground? Did the Plaintiff just...drop it? If it was just a chat then why would he have dropped it? I think it is far more likely that the Plaintiff was either exaggerating the attack (possibly due to not being accustomed to being accosted aggressively) or the rip itself was actually relatively minor. He did say it was around the pocket area-- so it is possible the pocket was pulled out of its stitching slightly which would be hard to see on the video. However, most importantly, in the video: the briefcase, which we KNOW was there based on the Defendant's own testimony that it was "on the ground" when he left, is now not being carried by the Plaintiff. If he was lying about his briefcase being stolen, wouldn't he still have it in the footage? What, did he just leave his own briefcase in the parking lot? The Defendant is lying about stealing it, it makes no sense otherwise. Unless we are going to claim that the Plaintiff decided to set his own briefcase off to the side off-view, rush in and fake a flustered reaction in front of the door cam just so he could then frame the defendant for money to replace his not-stolen laptop? Why? Some guy he didn't know walks up to him, rambling, and his reaction is to try and set up a scam via the hassle of small claims court? He had no reason to lie whereas the Defendant had every reason to. The Defendant was there to try and get his money back, not to "apologize". We don't know what was said during the convo, but I think it is far more likely that the Defendant realized he wasn't getting a refund and decided to steal the case in hopes to recoup some losses (or just out of spite). It takes far fewer leaps of logic to assume that the Plaintiff was slightly exaggerating about his shirt rip but telling the truth mostly than it is to assume he lied about the whole thing. Correct ruling.
I think the Plaintiff was using that line as a cover/substitute for the N-word. The movie dialogue was fitting because it's supposed to be an insult but i think the Plaintiff used the excuse of k-nig-ihts (knights) as a "PC", veiled attempt to refer to the defendant in a derogatory way and get away with it. I've seen the movie and agree that the line is funny in the movie but he was just a bigot for using it in this context. He knew what he was doing and acting like it was unrelated just makes him look foolish.
It’s crazy how most of these fools can’t see that man is in disguise! I’ve never walked around with my work gloves on and never seen any if my coworkers doing it.
I think I’m most offended that neither of them including the “fan” didn’t understand Monty python was making a joke out of the word “ Knights” if pronounced the way it was spelled.
Some of you are overplaying the ripped pocket on the shirt... yes although he has said it on the testimony there was no doubt the defendant was present at the plaintiff jobs to incite some type of revenge which is unreasonable.
@@kay22100 really cause it actually supports his claim, and so does the defendant so really it’s already a known thing the attack happened which thus does not in fact make him a liar.
Well I see it this way, I said what I could do and you attack me……I’m going for everything I can…..fuq him like I’m gonna be nice after that? Makes sense to me
He said his shirt was ripped along with the pocket on his shirt. But in the footage after the attack, the pocket looks fine to me and so does the shirt.
Defendant lost because he helped prove plaintiffs case. He emailed the plaintiff a thinly veiled threat and then shows up at plaintiff’s workplace a year later dressed all sus . The majority of civil claims are subjected to a preponderance of evidence standard.
Both the plaintiff and the defendant sound shady af. Once the plaintiff started getting bizzare emails, he should have just given him the money back and not dealt with him. Something def. sounds off with the defendant
He knew how to exploit the laws. File the police report and then rush to Family court and get the restraining order. This happens alot on the Major Cities.
Defendant should have paid the plaintiff the $4000 especially if he wanted a shot at bringing to light (alleged) theft of his music by prominent recording artists. With all the cameras outside everywhere, I don't see why more was not caught on tape....somewhere. I hope the plaintiff will be ok. I'm glad he won his case.
I see a lot of people in the comments being caught up on the "barely ripped shirt" as proof that the plaintiff is lying. And even if he is exaggerating quite a bit, that does not mean the defendant is telling the truth. A huge part of solving any mystery good enough for small claims is trying to figure out if someone would even have a motive for doing what they do. Then, if there are two conflicting stories, determining which of the two requires fewer assumptions to be true. Personally I think it is an easy call between "plaintiff lied about his briefcase being stolen just because he wanted to drag some stranger through the court system in an annoying hassle multiple times since he is cruel or has nothing better to do" or "plaintiff exaggerated the attack but his briefcase WAS stolen, then looking back he got really angry at being mugged and did his best to try and bloat his experience when retelling it to be even more in his favor to get a sense of justice over the situation" For small claims court there doesn't need to be a huge amount of evidence. In cases like this mostly the judges rule on human nature and what logically follows. Plaintiff had no reason to lie about the stolen goods. Defendant did. Motive alone nearly seals the deal the Defendant is guilty.
Music - Exactly right. First of all in this type of court it’s done by “a preponderance of evidence”, and if this cannot be established they go by who is telling the truth or more honest. Plaintiff got caught in a lie as none of his clothes even look like it’s been touched let alone torn or ripped. He looks like he’s lied about things, exaggerated things, and not kept his word, throughout his whole life. His privilege allows for him to get away with this.
@@bubblegum1948 I'm not saying I believe the defendant, however in the court of law it shouldn't be about what you believe happened it should be based on what you can prove. Do I believe he did it, Yes, but if i was a judge and couldn't prove it then i would never convict without evidence? This is scary that a judge can convict based on how they feel instead of the facts
@@bubblegum1948 you're full of it. The video isn't good enough quality to tell if the pocket is torn. A judge in criminal court found evidence to justify a restraining order. Why don't you just say you hate Jews? Defendant is so delusional he probably fantasized that he wrote the song.
Hmmm I’m kinda torn. Both of their stories seem like either could be true. Also I have zero evidence and never heard 2 seconds of his song but in my mind I think the migos stole it! 🤣 fight me
He actually clarified and said that 'his pocket was ripped open', not like his entire shirt was, but I can't see any ripped pocket either, although it's not the best video, but it doesn't look like much of anything in this video.
I'm in "the neighborhood," with gloves... plus the laughing smirk when he said he "blocked" his punch... guilty 😂😅 ... let's not even get into the Monty Python reference. Hemight as well have said he was heading into a game of Dungeons and Dragons with his high school clubmates.
The plaintiff might have misremembered his pocket or shirt torn etc When you’re in a situation like that and being attacked out of the blue, it’s hard to recall a lot of things. Either way, the fact that the defendant SHOWED up at his work place, used a false name to look for him, there was premeditated ill will towards the plaintiff. That dude got serious issues. He needs real medical/mental help.
I think the attorney felt threatened, overreacted and threw the briefcase at him and ran (Fight or Flight). The briefcase could've been stolen by a passerby in the parking lot, or the briefcase may not have been taken at all. -The judge totally relied on the plaintiff's word with zero evidence, and also in the video the plaintiff's shirt is NOT ripped or even disheveled.
Even if that were so, the fact that the defendant initiated the confrontation in the first place, caused for the briefcase to be lost. Some people can't be confronted like that because they may have issues with conflict that will cause them to freak out and run.
@@lupinaocean4326 But my point is if he freaked out and ran?, --He's an attorney and straight up lied about what happened in court. Shady attorney means the plaintiff was probably right about the fake ass price hike for doing less than nothing in his case.
He went back a year later and decided to act unchristian and fist fight a weaker person. he lost big time. No wonder he ain't famous, the defendant is a jerk.
The defendant seems mentally ill to me, based on how grandiose he seems to be about who he is-and he is definitely a legend in this own mind…and nobody else’s.
This judge is annoying, she asks them to explain and than cuts them to finish for them 🙄 😒 😑 although I like her but it's hard to understand the situation i still love her show though 😅🥰
@@Jean0987654321 he didn't pay for it lol. Did you not hear that part. He only paid 750 bc he thought that's all it was going to be then dude told him days later 4K is the grand totally for my expert opinion.
@@Jean0987654321 that's NOT WHAT YOU MEANT! PLEASE DON'T GO BACK AND EDIT YOUR COMMENT!!!! AFTER I MADE A POINT OF WHAT YOU WAS SAYING DIDN'T MAKE ANY SENSE.
I’m not going to say what I want to say about the plaintiff . But I know the type and the entitlement they feel and I don’t mean his nationality. He paid $750 just for someone to just listen to his song ? The man should have told him that he only deals with clean voice samples . He knew this man was sending over music . Smh 🤦🏽♀️
U know the business is dirty! He got played and he did look like the killer but I do think they profiled him in to “a big scary black guy came here today and we is scared.”
That was the estimate if they were able to compete the check. He said they would refund anything paid past the point of getting an error message. So, 4k would be for a verified answer.
THE GUY OUTSIDE HAS A SHIRT WITH THE PRINT FROM THE OVERLOOK HOTEL! (The Shining, Kubric version.) First guy Harvey talks to-he's wearing a hat! That's the exact same carpet from when the ball is rolled to Danny when he's playing with his cars. Can't believe I caught that!
14:20 You can clearly see corner of plaintiff’s pocket is torn. I was all prepared to be upset with him for lying but now I am just upset by the anti-Semitic eagerness of so many to refuse to see what’s there.
I don't think the judgement was fair whatsoever. The plaintiff should have gotten more in damages. Defendant threatened him via phone and email then came to his place of business assaulted and stole from him.
The plaintiff lied when he testified that the defendant ripped his shirt pocket in the parking lot. In the video there isn't anything wrong with his pocket!
Revelation 3:9 King James Version 9 Behold, I will make them of the synagogue of Satan, which say they are Jews, and are not, but do lie; behold, I will make them to come and worship before thy feet, and to know that I have loved thee.
There's a couple things iv noticed here, the defendant was wearing gloves which yeah he's saying he's working but those gloves are clean, also the glasses and that he gave a fake name when going to his work put that with the I was just in the neighborhood story and find this very alarming but I feel the plaintiff exaggerated a bit because his shirt pocket doesn't look all that torn in the video and the fact he called police Infront of that camera, just think of the walk from the parking lot to the office door and that's not a outside door by the looks of it so that's a fair amount of time where he wasn't calling the police 🤔
@@ms.anderson967 he didn’t say niglet, the plaintiff even spelled it as “knigget” which is not a racial slur. It’s the word “knight” being said like person who can’t read well so they pronounce the “k”
I feel the plaintiff knew how to orchestrate all of this and it worked. I just don’t believe he so happened to walk outside and stand in front of his doorbell camera and call the police. When the D showed up, he wasn’t even confrontational.
Yeah, me too. However, no one seemed to understand the French taunting pronunciation of the English "Knight". The defendant thought it was "Racist" because everything today is "Racist".
Violence awful 💔 assault what is wrong with people period but IAM so impressed with this beautiful 🙏 judge she listens cares and is respectful to both sides she listens cares about what's happening hearing cases but she's smart period she's a great role model 👌👍
I dunno man, the plaintiff was trying not to smirk the whole time. I feel like that dude did want to kick his ass, but the plaintiff is not telling the whole story.
Wait, you're telling me the Jewish guy is suing for $6k for pain and suffering, and the defendant is countersuing for his voice & music being stolen? You can't make this shit up. 😂
The seam of the pocket could have popped and continued to lay flat on his shirt, especially of it was starched. Just because it's not fraid with fibers sticking externally doesn't mean it's not ripped. What I do know is an burden of proof was needed to grant the restraining order. That burned of proof was met whether or not we see it here.
Monty Python in The Holy Grail is yelling at the knights, “your mother is a hamster and your father smelled of Elderberries you English Kniggetts”. He was mispronouncing the word knights. Lol Monty Python is hilarious and they are not making fun of any race in the movie just themselves. It’s funny try and watch it sometime. 😊
@@lovelymemarie exactly... i honestly dont think he attacked him. prob he advance towards him and he got all jumpy and scream and just draw attention. as u look at him u can see he is a crook and a coward.
That was my thought to. The attorney might say, in order to proceed/prove the case we will need to engage the services of a forensic analyst and their retainer fee is $750, followed by do you want me to hire them?
I'm kinda disappointed in the ruling on this smh Judge Milan normally seems to be great at navigating smoke screens but this plaintiff was obviously lying about that attack smh his shirt was not ripped on the pocket like he claimed (and I insist that this is very clear in that camera clip). He's supposedly so afraid & traumatized that he doesn't even look behind him when attempting to get into his office. I believe the defendant has been misunderstood based on his appearance, for instance his size yet if you listen to his words and observe his demeanor, he doesn't come across as someone who is interested in violence at all but an older, settled man who wants his credit for something he's already been screwed over on. Showing up at the plaintiff's job was a terrible idea yet I don't doubt that it happened as he said, he wanted to request his money back, plaintiff became afraid, having been taken off guard by an unknown large man who he then obviously recognized from their conversations once he'd identified himself (and possibly afraid because of the lyrics to whatever song this was) and he likely was so spooked that he dropped his belongings & ran. Defendant was probably nervous too, realizing he had scared this man, and ran off also. Leaving his belongings to be grabbed by any other random person crossing that parking lot. I have so many thoughts & opinions on this but mostly am disgusted at how the defendant was portrayed overall. He seems to have some sort of delay when responding but none of that is considered for his defense. He clearly stated that he turned his life around and seemed completely transparent when he said that he's a lot of things but not a thief. He shouldn't have come to the man's job unannounced for the exact reasons that resulted yet had explained that he was on a job in the area. This is disheartening.
1.shirt looks torn at 14:20 2.another judge found enough evidence against defendant to grant restraining order 3 defendant is so delusional, he probably fantasized that he wrote the song
When he said “I was already in the neighborhood.” I couldn’t help but burst out laughing. F*ck you mean you were in the area 😆
So true. Your comment is on point. 👍 🎼
I really wanted the judge to ask him what construction job he was there to work on. It would be easy to check to see if he would be lying about that.
Especially since he was living in Vegas 🤔🧐
@@robertlaschever3935 She knew his words were more BS - he went total thug when he didn't get his way, as in, he claimed he was ripped off by rappers so what does he do? he bullies & punches an innocent man who was hired to do a job. Defendant is a big baby, too.
@@carriepriegel6477 Spot on.
30 seconds in and this case sounds like a movie.
Be cool 😂
Lol
Its crazy when i was a kid..i thought the intro was serious af...now im laughing my ass off lmaoo
Same! My mom would watch this on tv and I was intimidated lol
I know right!!!😬😵💫
My shoulders always shimmy involuntarily 😁
Same here
@@Zera223 why I shimmied bc of your comment🤣🤣🤣
The gloves I found strange. When guys work in gloves, they are almost always the first thing taken off. I'd say that's a sign of a planned attack.
And the sunglasses.
I agree... a guy doesn't wear his working gloves all the way during his break .. to the time he is inside ringing a bell to meet someone .. same goes for the sunglasses. Most people will take them off while answering the door.
Yeah when I would meet my ex at work he’d take them off before even walking in my direction and put them in his pocket or hold them him still wearing them says trouble
He also had a mask. It was down around his neck, but (in my opinion) he did have it in case he needed to cover his face. Especially since the plaintiff did not know what he looked like before.
My husband drives forklifts and he doesn't take off his gloves til hes home and done. But he just likes gloves. He doesn't have to wear then he just does.
Defendant is really laying the BS on thick. Father of four, a coach, and the enemy of the devil. LOL.
🤣
More like besties of the devil.
😂😂😂 yes!!!
The guy is definitely a bully. And the guy with the glasses is the type of guy that would stick his tongue out while standing behind the teacher and go nana nana nana
For sure
Yeah but how can the Judge say she believes that the guy hit him without proof that he did. Crooked Justice?
Actually he seems very gentle and sincere to me, the Defendant.
He’s physically stronger than the Plaintiff because the P is a geeky little nerd but that’s just DNA.
Normally she would dismiss somebody’s case without evidence but she completely took the Plaintiff’s side just on face value. Judge is horrible.
@@bubblegum1948 shut up Latoya .. all u do is defend black people when they are guilty .
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
BTW. I looked up the word *”Kniggits”,* and what I found is that it is from a 1975 Monty Python skit, and it was used as an intentional mispronunciation of the word *”Knight”,* where French soldiers were mocking English knights in broken English. The defendant should’ve taken the time to look it up while he was stalking dude’s FB page. 🤷🏽♀️
But, the defendant said the plaintiff used the word “niglet”, not “kniggits”. The judge even repeats “niglets” when asking him for the meaning and the plaintiff tells her it’s from Monty Python. As you clarify, it is not. I think the judge would’ve liked to have known the truth of the word’s meaning. He should’ve been outed for being the slimy racist he apparently is.
Girl that’s what I’m saying! There wasn’t a “L” anywhere in that word! I am NOT a Monty Python fan and I know that skit!! And it was actually funny!
I came here to say just this!
Who else is dying to know what artists/what song he's talking about here?
He's suing LL COOL J for the song "I'M GONNA KNOCK U OUT"....
@@Jayzan-mt4gl how do you know? Just curious
@@joelldaugherty4917 I was jk 🤦♂️
@@Jayzan-mt4gl 🤣🤣🤣
Glitter by Mariah Carey.
The Monty Python thing is a joke about the spelling of “knights.” The French has trouble pronouncing it.
I was REALLY glad he had a reasonable explanation for a post the defendant tried to twist into racism.
@@earlisanorman3709 He didn't call anybody anything... He cited a direct Monty Python quote on a post asking for people's favourite movie quotes. He never said 'nigglets'. Were you listening at all? The word he said it's exactly as the person says above... It's a comedic mispronunciation of the word 'Knights'. If it was racist toward anyone, it would be French people.
@@heftyelf There’s no way that you can convince a layperson that he was so naive not to know what it could’ve been interpreted as. His smile when he spelled it said it all!!!
@@laquanperez2425 No, his smile was because before the guy started saying what the post said he had no idea what he was talking about... The smile indicated that he finally knew what he was referring to, and that he had a reasonable explanation as to how it came about and how it was misinterpreted. Outside of the US (and I suspect in some pockets inside the US as well), Monty Python is huge... I recognised the line instantly despite the butchered memory of guy who misinterpreted it.
@@heftyelf 🙄
The defendant is insane based off what he was emailing the plaintiff.
He probably imagined that he wrote the song
Idk the defendant sounds like something isn’t quite right
He sounds like he has speech difficulty or something probably why he lost. I feel like the other guy is lying about something!
True
He sent at least one email that babbled nonsense.
@@JS-uj2yi A speech impediment did not make him write that psychotic email. He’s unbalanced-which is probably why he fantasized he wrote the song in the first place.
@@ct6410 I was talking about him being able to speak properly in court and being able to defend himself.
The defendant is completely delusional 🙄
I want to know what the song is
Maybe not. Kesha, Dua Lipa Ashanti, Nicki Minaj. This isn't a rare thing in the music industry. Plenty of artists take what sre meant to be samples and pass them off as their music. JLO is notorious for this
I'm may so
This rapper who apparently doesn’t rap for a living, but rather works in construction and can’t afford $750 is so good at rapping that these very rich and successful competitors had to take recordings of his voice and use it illegally, instead of using literally anyone else on the planet to make this song.
You can literally use a fart noise as a sample and loop it into a beat. Famous singers and producers are not estranged to the concept of stealing from the unknown artists because it's much easier to recognize let's say Michael Jackson's voice than Kevin's from the hood.
I could imagine what a BAD rapper he is, too.
He has 4 kids dude.
That's the exact way they think when they pirate your music. You unintentionally hit it it right on the head, no one will ever figure it out.
@@audiodynamixBagzzit’s happened to my family personally… they take people NO ONE KNOWS and steal their entire music… and it comes off like “what makes you special” if u say something or stick up for yourself.. crazy stuff 🤦🏾♀️
He grabbed the briefcase to hold it hostage for the refund of his $750 fee.
Which he cannot do.
It is more than that.
Okay... this guy was just comical. He threw his stuff at me and ran! What 😅🧐🤣
The case is wild af. Wish it was longer.
its pretty lon and old and hmmm cool name and that guys fees are to hgh
There's a bunch of lies coming out of the defendant 💯
I think he’s so unstable, he doesn’t know what’s true.
And the plaintiff
@@ct6410 he imagined he wrote that song.
hi.. once.. the plaintiff.. said 'hebrew name'.. i knew he was telling pure lies.. be blessed
Uhm. Anyone notice how the shirt was not ripped at all???
Same. I was like uhhhhhhh
@@poshpearls23 right I was confused
You cannot determine that from the video.
Looks ripped at 14:15
His left pocket does look torn he said he tore my pocket
Dude outside in brown hat was excited af to give his opinion. He act like it was a celebrity interview lmaooo
I’m like why is he dresses like and retired Italian low level mobster who lives in boca
12:25 he’s right that’s a quote from Monty python. As a black man I’ve watched that movie when I was a kid, and that is word for word the quote in the movie.
The defendant took some liberty’s with his interpretations.
💯
Wym “as a black man?” That’s not a common black movie whatsoever
Also sounds like he was stalking him. I’d Be like why you checking my Facebook weirdo
Yeah, it is a joking mispronunciation of "knight". I don't know why no one knew that on the show.
@@courtneycarpenter5283 why do movies have to be for a demographic and not just for the general public? 🤔
I’m so white I’m damn near translucent and I like plenty of your so called “Common Black movies”
Missed opportunity:
Judge: Who were you working for in Los Angeles?
Now, give me their phone number!
That would have settled the case.
M
Lo
Judge Judy would have done that and then been all over his case lol.
@@chainsawsally1802 Judge Judy doesn't hesitate to use the Bat Phone.
@@chainsawsally1802i was just about to comment that!
I think that the plaintiff is lying cause he said the pocket of his shirt was riped and in the video after the attack it isn't
I'm going to say the same thing where's the rip shirt
Yeah that did it for me. The plaintiff is a blatant lier!!
EXACTLY!
Wow! It sure is! I wish this could be overruled!
I dunno, I think it is more telling that the Defendant's position was "I just went over to apologize and then left" but then later when asked about the laptop/briefcase in his own words he said "I dunno what happened to it, it fell on the ground." If there really was no altercation, why was the briefcase even on the ground? Did the Plaintiff just...drop it? If it was just a chat then why would he have dropped it?
I think it is far more likely that the Plaintiff was either exaggerating the attack (possibly due to not being accustomed to being accosted aggressively) or the rip itself was actually relatively minor. He did say it was around the pocket area-- so it is possible the pocket was pulled out of its stitching slightly which would be hard to see on the video.
However, most importantly, in the video: the briefcase, which we KNOW was there based on the Defendant's own testimony that it was "on the ground" when he left, is now not being carried by the Plaintiff. If he was lying about his briefcase being stolen, wouldn't he still have it in the footage? What, did he just leave his own briefcase in the parking lot?
The Defendant is lying about stealing it, it makes no sense otherwise. Unless we are going to claim that the Plaintiff decided to set his own briefcase off to the side off-view, rush in and fake a flustered reaction in front of the door cam just so he could then frame the defendant for money to replace his not-stolen laptop? Why? Some guy he didn't know walks up to him, rambling, and his reaction is to try and set up a scam via the hassle of small claims court? He had no reason to lie whereas the Defendant had every reason to.
The Defendant was there to try and get his money back, not to "apologize". We don't know what was said during the convo, but I think it is far more likely that the Defendant realized he wasn't getting a refund and decided to steal the case in hopes to recoup some losses (or just out of spite).
It takes far fewer leaps of logic to assume that the Plaintiff was slightly exaggerating about his shirt rip but telling the truth mostly than it is to assume he lied about the whole thing.
Correct ruling.
OH FFS. CLEESE WAS PRONOUNCING 'KNIGHTS' PHONETICALLY, THAT'S WHY IT'S FUNNY.
In old English that is how it was pronounced.
they are in search of ever smaller grievances, victimhood is social currency.
You would love Monty python then lol
I think the Plaintiff was using that line as a cover/substitute for the N-word. The movie dialogue was fitting because it's supposed to be an insult but i think the Plaintiff used the excuse of k-nig-ihts (knights) as a "PC", veiled attempt to refer to the defendant in a derogatory way and get away with it. I've seen the movie and agree that the line is funny in the movie but he was just a bigot for using it in this context. He knew what he was doing and acting like it was unrelated just makes him look foolish.
Yeeeah not many young people know about monty python.
Coconuts for horse shoe sounds...best part.
$750 initially then $275 an hour after that ? Wow I am in the wrong job !!!😅😅😅😅😅😅😅
😮 Are you Jewish? 😂🤣
Defendant looks like he's in disguise and wearing them gloves. That was a failed attempt of an attack
It’s crazy how most of these fools can’t see that man is in disguise! I’ve never walked around with my work gloves on and never seen any if my coworkers doing it.
I think I’m most offended that neither of them including the “fan” didn’t understand Monty python was making a joke out of the word “ Knights” if pronounced the way it was spelled.
Lol 😂right?
I know!!! I thought everybody understood Monty Python!!
Some of you are overplaying the ripped pocket on the shirt... yes although he has said it on the testimony there was no doubt the defendant was present at the plaintiff jobs to incite some type of revenge which is unreasonable.
Well it proves the plaintiff is a liar
If you look at the video, there is no ripped pocket. I just find the plaintiff very dodgy.
@@SBShah-qq7st same
@@kay22100 really cause it actually supports his claim, and so does the defendant so really it’s already a known thing the attack happened which thus does not in fact make him a liar.
The defendant attacked him. That much is easy to see. The plaintiff was also trying to get extra money off his lawsuit. Classic.
Well I see it this way, I said what I could do and you attack me……I’m going for everything I can…..fuq him like I’m gonna be nice after that? Makes sense to me
“Oh absolutely you can’t just ambushed somebody in the parking lot”(nods heads)
It was his time to shine 🤣
He was READY
😂😂😂😂😂😂@@Verharri
Lol he probably rehearse on that moment @@poshpearls23
Too funny 😂😂
Can’t believe the plaintiff tried the “pain and suffering” bs.. and saying he’s seeing a counselor.
If anyone needs pain and suffering counseling, it should be the AA here in America.
Well, he does have small hat
“Help me fight evil” 👀I wanna hear that song
😂😂😂
"It's Pimpin" by Too Short and E-40. The song sucks so I'm not sure why he chose this one to claim as his.
brutha went DEEP, like Immortal TechNIQUE! hahaha
Thumbs up if you recognized the Monty Python quote before it was explained.
6:30 The best part of this entire video is the dark haired kid's reaction in the back. He has the biggest grin on his face 🤣
He said his shirt was ripped along with the pocket on his shirt. But in the footage after the attack, the pocket looks fine to me and so does the shirt.
yep.. pockets were intact
yes he didn't look roughed up at all. Looked very pristine.
Smart
True!!
I said the same thing
Defendant lost because he helped prove plaintiffs case. He emailed the plaintiff a thinly veiled threat and then shows up at plaintiff’s workplace a year later dressed all sus . The majority of civil claims are subjected to a preponderance of evidence standard.
Both the plaintiff and the defendant sound shady af. Once the plaintiff started getting bizzare emails, he should have just given him the money back and not dealt with him. Something def. sounds off with the defendant
Na, I would had told him to never email me again, if you do then I will file a restraining order aganist you.
He’s an employee, he can’t just give out refunds because he got “bizarre emails”
He said no more emails and that we'll handle this in person.
Judge: okay and then what did he do?
And then he sent some emails....
I see them chuckling and giggling. Do they hear the voice overs?
Lol ive always wondered that..
They play out loud for the audience and both Plantiffs & Defendants can hear
Yes they do.
Check all the episodes and watch closely, you'll see their reactions immediately after the announcer is done hin introductions.
Obviously
@@jessphiladendron9295 same..
14:34 no torn shirt, got me side eyeing the plaintiff.
He knew how to exploit the laws. File the police report and then rush to Family court and get the restraining order. This happens alot on the Major Cities.
@@ChristopherLeonJohnson yep especially when the defendant is African American and plaintiff is white in this case Jewish.
Girl I was trying my best to find a torn pocket 👀🤣
Same smh I'm like "torn shirt!?"
@Alexander The Great No baby - he is no Morris Chestnut lol...Morris is whew...tall glass of hot chocolate!
Defendant should have paid the plaintiff the $4000 especially if he wanted a shot at bringing to light (alleged) theft of his music by prominent recording artists.
With all the cameras outside everywhere, I don't see why more was not caught on tape....somewhere.
I hope the plaintiff will be ok. I'm glad he won his case.
Yes. And don't forget, the guy could get any money that has been made on the music by the thief.
Thank you. Something said that wasn't biased.
this dude is crazy and would no doubt be a danger to anyone that disagrees with him
I see a lot of people in the comments being caught up on the "barely ripped shirt" as proof that the plaintiff is lying. And even if he is exaggerating quite a bit, that does not mean the defendant is telling the truth. A huge part of solving any mystery good enough for small claims is trying to figure out if someone would even have a motive for doing what they do. Then, if there are two conflicting stories, determining which of the two requires fewer assumptions to be true.
Personally I think it is an easy call between "plaintiff lied about his briefcase being stolen just because he wanted to drag some stranger through the court system in an annoying hassle multiple times since he is cruel or has nothing better to do" or "plaintiff exaggerated the attack but his briefcase WAS stolen, then looking back he got really angry at being mugged and did his best to try and bloat his experience when retelling it to be even more in his favor to get a sense of justice over the situation"
For small claims court there doesn't need to be a huge amount of evidence. In cases like this mostly the judges rule on human nature and what logically follows. Plaintiff had no reason to lie about the stolen goods. Defendant did. Motive alone nearly seals the deal the Defendant is guilty.
Well said
YEah but how can the Judge say she believes he hit him without proof? Crooked Justice?
Music - Exactly right.
First of all in this type of court it’s done by “a preponderance of evidence”, and if this cannot be established they go by who is telling the truth or more honest.
Plaintiff got caught in a lie as none of his clothes even look like it’s been touched let alone torn or ripped.
He looks like he’s lied about things, exaggerated things, and not kept his word, throughout his whole life. His privilege allows for him to get away with this.
@@bubblegum1948 I'm not saying I believe the defendant, however in the court of law it shouldn't be about what you believe happened it should be based on what you can prove. Do I believe he did it, Yes, but if i was a judge and couldn't prove it then i would never convict without evidence? This is scary that a judge can convict based on how they feel instead of the facts
@@bubblegum1948 you're full of it. The video isn't good enough quality to tell if the pocket is torn. A judge in criminal court found evidence to justify a restraining order.
Why don't you just say you hate Jews?
Defendant is so delusional he probably fantasized that he wrote the song.
Plaintiff seems very weasely, and defendant seems very shifty. Here's what you get when two annoying people encounter each other.
"I'm a lot of things"...A liar is definately one of those things!!
The judge did not ask the plaintiff where his torn shirt was
The corner could have been torn. You can't tell that from the video. He didn't say his pocket was ripped completely off.
UK MedicFRCS oh but he did!
@@liveandlearn6504 9:53
He did not say his pocket was torn off. He said and I quote ' my pocket was torn open '.
@@liveandlearn6504 And in the video you can see the left side of his shirt is torn. 14:34
@@ukmedicfrcs no you can't. You get a good look at the pocket towards the end of the video and there is definitely no tear at all.
Not doubting that there was a confrontation but he stated his shirt was ripped by the defendant. In the video playback does it look ripped?
he said his pocket actually, but do not see anything.
Aww, Motti seems awesome. May Hashem keep you safe and happy. You did good.
Man, anyone can accuse you of anything without any evidence and cost you sooo much. A former tenant sued me for my own futon and cost me a day’s work.
Pretty much, especially if they can, even slightly, prove it.
It’s insane in the states, don’t breathe or you’ll get sued
Do you do this a lot?
Do... get attacked?
Me: 🙄🤦🏿♀️🤣🤣🤣 you know full damn well he wasn't asking if you "do"/get attacked a lot
Hmmm I’m kinda torn. Both of their stories seem like either could be true. Also I have zero evidence and never heard 2 seconds of his song but in my mind I think the migos stole it! 🤣 fight me
That’s so funny. My mind went straight to the migos. We might be weird ‼️🤣🤣
Lmao 🤣🤣🤣 oh my, I had the exact same thought that the migos stole it too
Weirdos unite! lol lol
haha! i said kanye
Migos or Travis Scott
I love the narrators voice in the beginning lol
I thought he said his shirt was ripped on camera his shirt looks fine
Good catch.
He actually clarified and said that 'his pocket was ripped open', not like his entire shirt was, but I can't see any ripped pocket either, although it's not the best video, but it doesn't look like much of anything in this video.
I'm in "the neighborhood," with gloves... plus the laughing smirk when he said he "blocked" his punch... guilty 😂😅
... let's not even get into the Monty Python reference. Hemight as well have said he was heading into a game of Dungeons and Dragons with his high school clubmates.
The plaintiff might have misremembered his pocket or shirt torn etc
When you’re in a situation like that and being attacked out of the blue, it’s hard to recall a lot of things.
Either way, the fact that the defendant SHOWED up at his work place, used a false name to look for him, there was premeditated ill will towards the plaintiff.
That dude got serious issues. He needs real medical/mental help.
He said his shirt was torn…the pocket was torn. The pocket is a component of a shirt, his statement was accurate!
I think the attorney felt threatened, overreacted and threw the briefcase at him and ran (Fight or Flight). The briefcase could've been stolen by a passerby in the parking lot, or the briefcase may not have been taken at all. -The judge totally relied on the plaintiff's word with zero evidence, and also in the video the plaintiff's shirt is NOT ripped or even disheveled.
Even if that were so, the fact that the defendant initiated the confrontation in the first place, caused for the briefcase to be lost. Some people can't be confronted like that because they may have issues with conflict that will cause them to freak out and run.
@@lupinaocean4326 But my point is if he freaked out and ran?, --He's an attorney and straight up lied about what happened in court. Shady attorney means the plaintiff was probably right about the fake ass price hike for doing less than nothing in his case.
the defendant walked in looking nervous and guilty,,,gonna watch now
That's riley from the boondocks all grown up 😂
Omg now I can't see anything but that! 🤣🤣🤣 Young Reezy 💯
oh god, hahaha
Who the hell has not seen monty python & the holy grail? Seriously...it's a iconic classic
This!! I’m wondering the same thing
Never seen it and I have no desire. Seen snippets looks boring
@@StevenDoh sorry you're boring but ok
@@StevenDoh 👍 it's total garbage. Maybe two good jokes at best.
The Life of Brian however... 👌
I think 5 mins of that movie is too much
How uncomfortable is the defendant when the plaintiff is telling about the actual encounter, body language is screaming y'all
Yes!
Such a good episode!
The very first sentence was enough for me to drop everything and watch this
He went back a year later and decided to act unchristian and fist fight a weaker person. he lost big time. No wonder he ain't famous, the defendant is a jerk.
The defendant seems mentally ill to me, based on how grandiose he seems to be about who he is-and he is definitely a legend in this own mind…and nobody else’s.
It’s known that a lot of upcoming producers have their music stolen and used with major artists.
This judge is annoying, she asks them to explain and than cuts them to finish for them 🙄 😒 😑 although I like her but it's hard to understand the situation i still love her show though 😅🥰
Yea she admitted on one of the episodes she has a problem cutting people off talking also in her words said it’s rude
agreed. i swear sometimes shes pms'ing
@@Melanin_Rich_ deadass
She’s always been like this tbh. She does in every episode. So annoying 🙄😒
I do have a problem with Motti lying about his being torn , his pocket was in tact.
Watch again. I clearly looks different at the corner. Tearing the pocket doesn't mean its hanging off.
4K to listen to a 5 minutes song is ridiculous and a money grab.
Then he shouldn't pay for it and find someone else to analyze for his music for less
@@Jean0987654321 he didn't pay for it lol. Did you not hear that part. He only paid 750 bc he thought that's all it was going to be then dude told him days later 4K is the grand totally for my expert opinion.
@@Vanessa_Martinez that's what I meant. Typo there
@@Jean0987654321 that's NOT WHAT YOU MEANT! PLEASE DON'T GO BACK AND EDIT YOUR COMMENT!!!! AFTER I MADE A POINT OF WHAT YOU WAS SAYING DIDN'T MAKE ANY SENSE.
@@Jean0987654321 stand in your sht don't be editing your comments after I reply that's fake sht.
“ you do this alot?” What get attacked 😂😂
Forget the case.... Douglas (Baliff) is a cutie. Is Douglas Cuban?? He doesn't say much. BLESSINGS MR. DOUGLAS 🌹
That’s what I’m saying he is fine!
Cuban? Ummm, no!
I did not see a ripped shirt. The judge already made her mind up.
He was done the minute he showed up at dude's door. He was there to get his money and if he didn't he was going to try and beat it out of him.
I’m not going to say what I want to say about the plaintiff . But I know the type and the entitlement they feel and I don’t mean his nationality. He paid $750 just for someone to just listen to his song ? The man should have told him that he only deals with clean voice samples . He knew this man was sending over music . Smh 🤦🏽♀️
U know the business is dirty! He got played and he did look like the killer but I do think they profiled him in to “a big scary black guy came here today and we is scared.”
Yes, I get you because I am thinking the same thing. He played his entitlement cards well and screwed the plaintiff over.
Exactly
Well said.
I know what you mean sis because I was thinking the same thing
That guy was too proud of his own answer. 😂😂😂😂 16:09
A rare instance where punitive damages were also awarded in a case on this series of programs
When defending your case and add unrelated info like I'm a father of four and a coach 😂😂you guilty
How are you going to charge $4,000 just to say you can't do anything. Seems scammy to me.
That was the estimate if they were able to compete the check. He said they would refund anything paid past the point of getting an error message. So, 4k would be for a verified answer.
THE GUY OUTSIDE HAS A SHIRT WITH THE PRINT FROM THE OVERLOOK HOTEL! (The Shining, Kubric version.) First guy Harvey talks to-he's wearing a hat! That's the exact same carpet from when the ball is rolled to Danny when he's playing with his cars. Can't believe I caught that!
14:20 You can clearly see corner of plaintiff’s pocket is torn. I was all prepared to be upset with him for lying but now I am just upset by the anti-Semitic eagerness of so many to refuse to see what’s there.
Why do Jewish people always claim that someone is being antiSHEMetic? There are many nations of SHEMETIC people. AA are SHEMETIC people.
So you feel that if that guy really swung on him he was able to block it while holding a suitcase? Please make it make sense.
I don't think the judgement was fair whatsoever. The plaintiff should have gotten more in damages. Defendant threatened him via phone and email then came to his place of business assaulted and stole from him.
Monti lied about the attack, his pocket wasn' t ripped!
You can't tell. Video quality isn't good enough
Crook he is
The plaintiff lied when he testified that the defendant ripped his shirt pocket in the parking lot. In the video there isn't anything wrong with his pocket!
EXACTLY!
Revelation 3:9
King James Version
9 Behold, I will make them of the synagogue of Satan, which say they are Jews, and are not, but do lie; behold, I will make them to come and worship before thy feet, and to know that I have loved thee.
@@vainw3694 exactly what I thought too! I told my husband about this case and said, and he's a Hebrew Jew!😥💔
It doesn't matter if it was exaggerated. He had no business being there on the property and attacking him. Civil courts exist for this reason.
It looks slightly torn to me. So he wasn’t attacked hard enough for you folks?
There's a couple things iv noticed here, the defendant was wearing gloves which yeah he's saying he's working but those gloves are clean, also the glasses and that he gave a fake name when going to his work put that with the I was just in the neighborhood story and find this very alarming but I feel the plaintiff exaggerated a bit because his shirt pocket doesn't look all that torn in the video and the fact he called police Infront of that camera, just think of the walk from the parking lot to the office door and that's not a outside door by the looks of it so that's a fair amount of time where he wasn't calling the police 🤔
HThanks he just said that he called 911 and the police came. Smh
Notice matti came back WITHOUT a briefcase!
He quoted “niglet”, but he’s not sure what it means 🤔 hmm
Exactly!
If you're a Monty Python fan, you get it. It's spoken by a guy trying to say "knight," but sounding it out like an idiot.
Exactly......he knows what he used it for
@@ms.anderson967 he didn’t say niglet, the plaintiff even spelled it as “knigget” which is not a racial slur. It’s the word “knight” being said like person who can’t read well so they pronounce the “k”
I feel the plaintiff knew how to orchestrate all of this and it worked. I just don’t believe he so happened to walk outside and stand in front of his doorbell camera and call the police. When the D showed up, he wasn’t even confrontational.
12:50 LOVE the Monty Python quote!
Yeah, me too. However, no one seemed to understand the French taunting pronunciation of the English "Knight". The defendant thought it was "Racist" because everything today is "Racist".
I knew it was downhill when he sent a Jewish man an email about Jesus Christ 😩
😂😂😂 maybe why the plaintiff is lying. Jesus pisses them off
Violence awful 💔 assault what is wrong with people period but IAM so impressed with this beautiful 🙏 judge she listens cares and is respectful to both sides she listens cares about what's happening hearing cases but she's smart period she's a great role model 👌👍
I dunno man, the plaintiff was trying not to smirk the whole time. I feel like that dude did want to kick his ass, but the plaintiff is not telling the whole story.
Poor Douglas is always the punching bag. 😂
If that BIG dude swung on him, then I highly doubt he would just block it like a trained fighter…. Suspicious
I didn't know raising your arms was only taught to fighters...
@@fortifarse 😂😂😂 RIGHT!
Wait, you're telling me the Jewish guy is suing for $6k for pain and suffering, and the defendant is countersuing for his voice & music being stolen? You can't make this shit up. 😂
I hope she regrets this judgement smfh
The seam of the pocket could have popped and continued to lay flat on his shirt, especially of it was starched. Just because it's not fraid with fibers sticking externally doesn't mean it's not ripped.
What I do know is an burden of proof was needed to grant the restraining order. That burned of proof was met whether or not we see it here.
😆 Plaintiff has NEVER been in a fight in his life and the lies are hilarious! He swung and hit the inside of your arm, eh? 😆
Same arm that was holding the coffee apparently 🙄🙄🙄🙄
THE DEFENDANT IS JUST SO MAD AND WASN'T SATISFY ENOUGH FOR THE RESULTS/RESOLVE OF THE TEST.
God I want to know what rappers hes referring to.
"It's Pimpin" by Too Short and E-40. The song sucks so I'm not sure why he chose this one to claim as his.
What song and what artists were using his music lol
Monty Python in The Holy Grail is yelling at the knights, “your mother is a hamster and your father smelled of Elderberries you English Kniggetts”. He was mispronouncing the word knights. Lol Monty Python is hilarious and they are not making fun of any race in the movie just themselves. It’s funny try and watch it sometime. 😊
Sike
Defendant is paranoid and dangerous.
still looking to see the rip shirt pocket
Mee too he lied
@@lovelymemarie exactly... i honestly dont think he attacked him. prob he advance towards him and he got all jumpy and scream and just draw attention. as u look at him u can see he is a crook and a coward.
Yesss thats what i was looking for......its not even ripped
Right I noticed that too
If he had an attorney, the attorney would be the one to hire the forensic analyst because they would have to get him.
That was my thought to. The attorney might say, in order to proceed/prove the case we will need to engage the services of a forensic analyst and their retainer fee is $750, followed by do you want me to hire them?
I'm kinda disappointed in the ruling on this smh Judge Milan normally seems to be great at navigating smoke screens but this plaintiff was obviously lying about that attack smh his shirt was not ripped on the pocket like he claimed (and I insist that this is very clear in that camera clip). He's supposedly so afraid & traumatized that he doesn't even look behind him when attempting to get into his office. I believe the defendant has been misunderstood based on his appearance, for instance his size yet if you listen to his words and observe his demeanor, he doesn't come across as someone who is interested in violence at all but an older, settled man who wants his credit for something he's already been screwed over on. Showing up at the plaintiff's job was a terrible idea yet I don't doubt that it happened as he said, he wanted to request his money back, plaintiff became afraid, having been taken off guard by an unknown large man who he then obviously recognized from their conversations once he'd identified himself (and possibly afraid because of the lyrics to whatever song this was) and he likely was so spooked that he dropped his belongings & ran. Defendant was probably nervous too, realizing he had scared this man, and ran off also. Leaving his belongings to be grabbed by any other random person crossing that parking lot. I have so many thoughts & opinions on this but mostly am disgusted at how the defendant was portrayed overall. He seems to have some sort of delay when responding but none of that is considered for his defense. He clearly stated that he turned his life around and seemed completely transparent when he said that he's a lot of things but not a thief. He shouldn't have come to the man's job unannounced for the exact reasons that resulted yet had explained that he was on a job in the area. This is disheartening.
1.shirt looks torn at 14:20
2.another judge found enough evidence against defendant to grant restraining order
3 defendant is so delusional, he probably fantasized that he wrote the song