How to CRUSH DATA BROKERS with Rob Shavell from DeleteMe

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 29 чер 2024
  • How do data brokers work? How do they find your data? What can you do? A super insightful interview with Rob Shavell from Abine DeleteMe to offer an inside look into the data industry of people-searching sites.
    Our Patreon: / techlore
    Our Forum: discuss.techlore.tech
    Techlore Talks Podcast & RSS: dispatch.techlore.tech/
    Timestamps:
    00:00 Introducing Rob
    01:00 Defining 'people-searching websites'
    04:12 Why do people-searching sites even exist?
    06:06 How are people-searching sites different from phone books?
    13:27 Where does all this data come from?
    18:17 How do these sites correlate data to an individual?
    22:04 How do people investigate themselves? Is this a wordwide problem?
    25:05 The emotional, personal, and 'real' side of privacy
    29:05 What options do people have to address the problem?
    34:22 Covering preventative measures
    36:38 Covering automatic profile deletion & services like DeleteMe
    38:41 What's the scope of what DeleteMe deletes?
    41:05 Is DeleteMe available outside of the US?
    42:18 What's the long-term solution to this problem?
    47:03 Does privacy regulation impact DeleteMe effectiveness?
    49:52 The story behind Rob, privacy, and DeleteMe
    53:17 Closing Words
    References:
    DeleteMe Kickback Link: www.anrdoezrs.net/click-10037...
    Standard DeleteMe Link: joindeleteme.com/
    🔐 Our Website: techlore.tech
    🕵 Go Incognito Course - to learn about privacy: techlore.tech/goincognito
    🏫 Techlore Coaching - to get direct support: techlore.tech/coaching
    💻 Techlore Forum - to connect with other advocates: discuss.techlore.tech
    🦣 Mastodon - to stay updated: social.lol/@techlore
    We cannot provide our content without our Patrons, huge thanks to:
    BRIGHTSIDE, Clark, Ente, Larry, Afonso, Boori, Brad, Casper, Cookie, Floyd, JohnnyO, kevin, love your content, NotSure, Poaclu, x
    🧡 Join them on Patreon: / techlore
    💚 To see our production gear, privacy tools we use, and other affiliates: techlore.tech/affiliates
    💖 All Techlore Support Methods: techlore.tech/support
    #deleteme #privacy #techlore
  • Наука та технологія

КОМЕНТАРІ • 55

  • @techlore
    @techlore  Рік тому +8

    Major thanks to Rob for coming on Techlore 🙏
    *➡If you enjoy these interviews, support us on Patreon so we can keep them going - thanks for watching everyone!* patreon.com/techlore

    • @kulled
      @kulled Рік тому +2

      FIRSTTTTT

    • @HelloWorld-zu3ru
      @HelloWorld-zu3ru 11 місяців тому

      Was there a reason a certain "word " was cut out at 30:13 - 30:15 ?

    • @rosanneallen-hewlett9973
      @rosanneallen-hewlett9973 4 місяці тому

      Are you saying that since my personal info. had been Hi-jacked' (some of it wrong), and because I'm not in Calif., that it would be useless to sign up for your service? Are you? -R

  • @MalachiMarvin
    @MalachiMarvin Рік тому +19

    If I remember correctly, not only was the phone book opt out, you had to pay a fee to opt out. They called it an 'unlisted number'.

    • @Provocateur3
      @Provocateur3 Рік тому +1

      Also back then there was a resource called the City Directory. You could not opt out. It had much more information than the phone book. It was available at any public library to anyone.

    • @laurencefraser
      @laurencefraser Рік тому +3

      Of note, such phone books and directories tended to only be for a specific area, and quite scarce or difficult to access if you weren't in that area. Usually, anyway.

    • @Provocateur3
      @Provocateur3 Рік тому

      @@laurencefraser:
      Yes, good point.

    • @SirenaSpades
      @SirenaSpades 4 місяці тому

      It was the phone company. You paid the phone company for an unlisted number. Also, operators could connect people to numbers, so it wasn't just the phone book. You had to pay for the unlisted number. There were various grades of phone services. From party lines, which was the most basic service, a shared line among multiple houses where your neighbor down the street might pick up and listen in on your call. A listed number. The unlisted number. There may have been more options.

  • @redeyesdrogon786
    @redeyesdrogon786 Рік тому +7

    This was a great interview. I hope to see more interviews like these in the future!

  • @danieru3
    @danieru3 Рік тому +3

    A great interview, thanks!

  • @greob
    @greob Рік тому +3

    Nice interview!

  • @maxmustermann7365
    @maxmustermann7365 Рік тому +10

    Does anybody know how this applies to EU?
    In the EU
    - giving personal information to 3rd parties without consent is strictly prohibited
    - we have a right to be forgotten
    Are there such data broker companies in the EU and how should they receive data if I didn't gave my consent in cookie banner?
    (Sure they could illegaly but that would shut down the company legally)

    • @jacquelinemanzano9328
      @jacquelinemanzano9328 Рік тому

      absolutely, how do you think the for profit corporations market their products to the consumers. Not everyone watches TV but just about everyone receives mail and phone messages.

    • @maxmustermann7365
      @maxmustermann7365 Рік тому

      @@jacquelinemanzano9328 I mean Google does not share personal data to 3rd in terms of transferring copy's of data.
      Google just sells advertising customers the possibility to publish their ads to targeted groups (according to them) so I wonder what those shady cooperations are.
      With Meta idk, they openly contradict GDPR in so many ways

    • @adam.maqavoy
      @adam.maqavoy 12 днів тому

      @@jacquelinemanzano9328 Thats not what he asked?
      Were you *Born Yesterday* as the rest of your Nation?

  • @shayantsital1783
    @shayantsital1783 Рік тому +6

    The only issue i have is that it's not available in most countries outside of US

    • @kerjakita2609
      @kerjakita2609 Рік тому

      Yes too bad, we also this features internationally

    • @cytroyd
      @cytroyd Рік тому

      Try Incogni.

    • @kerjakita2609
      @kerjakita2609 Рік тому

      @@cytroyd too bad also US, UK, EU only

  • @accidentsafe
    @accidentsafe 8 місяців тому +1

    My mom paid $5 a month to keep her name out of the phone book. Also gave her a private number.

  • @Not_Your_Regular_News
    @Not_Your_Regular_News 5 місяців тому +1

    Ever notice how few views around these videos. Makes you wonder why

  • @rwgreene999
    @rwgreene999 Рік тому +1

    In the 'old days' we had to pay to op-out of the phone book.

  • @JEdwardBanasikJr
    @JEdwardBanasikJr Рік тому +1

    Being removed from the yearly printed "White Pages" residential phone book was not as simple as calling your phone company. You had to pay the equivalent in today's money of $10 a month for an unlisted number. People could still dial 411 and pay ($2.50 today) to get your phone number and address. Only a fool would have listed their cell phone number in the phone book back in the 90s if it was even an option. It was also $50 equiv a month for each service: Home phone number (caller-id extra), Internet (dial-up only) and Cell Phone (no free minutes at $1.75/minute for both incoming and outgoing calls). The only good thing back then was no company could afford to collect your data.

  • @adam.maqavoy
    @adam.maqavoy 12 днів тому

    *DeleteMe* Only exists in US (where the servers are located)
    None of The Suggestion you just *Provided* applies - For the rest.

  • @Kas_Styles
    @Kas_Styles Рік тому +3

    Great interview

  • @lister1580
    @lister1580 Рік тому

    Is there going to be an arken tutorial?

  • @rwgreene999
    @rwgreene999 Рік тому +1

    I moved half way across the country. I used google street view extensively as well as google earth. I would go up and down the street, check the next blocks, check the view from Earth, before I would ever contact the real-estate people about a house. The moving company reviewed street view to make sure they could get their truck up to the house. The tree trimming people reviewed street view to determine if it was worthwhile coming out to make an estimate. If you managed to block street views, then you are blocking potential sales ability and work contracts.
    The real thing to do is block private information and project public information.

  • @quickmythril2398
    @quickmythril2398 Рік тому +3

    the phone book conversation is a bit off here. they did have names, addresses and numbers. yes they required you to ask to be unlisted, but it was a very easy thing to do. no one considered that extreme. and you CAN still get calls. several times you make it sound like an unlisted number is practically disconnecting your line. no, you can get calls from anyone you give your number to. it just wasn't public.

    • @quickmythril2398
      @quickmythril2398 Рік тому +1

      also henry, it was not the "cell company". this was before cell phones. :)

  • @Jzombi301
    @Jzombi301 Рік тому +1

    i searched on multiple different search engines using a bunch of different search terms but i couldn’t find any information about me. i did find stuff about my mom. i looked on whitepages and searched many different variations of my name and my phone number and address but i still couldn't find myself. i know im not invisible but i did delete nearly all my social media and changed my name on the ones that i kept. but i still feel like i should've found something, especially with my phone number and address. am i doing something wrong? is it normally this hard to find information about yourself?

    • @SirenaSpades
      @SirenaSpades 4 місяці тому

      You just go on google and search your first and last name. Example: John Smith

  • @mukkaar
    @mukkaar Рік тому

    Third party sharing of information is really the most problematic part, and ofc just internal security of the service you are using in first place.
    But third party sharing just doesn't make sense, if data is shared with third party, what about their terms of service? Or what about one after that if third party shares it? Customer didn't agree to those.
    I mean terms of service is kinda shaky subject anyways, but at very least customer should shown every single third party service they share data with and made to agree with sharing of data and possibly terms of service for those. And possibly ones after that.
    If that's too hard, they could just not share anything.

  • @hamzah9089
    @hamzah9089 Рік тому +1

    Some of this stuff in inaccurate. The vast majority of the data on people search websites comes from you and services you sign up for. For example, if you go and get a bank account or sign up for some order with your true name, address, phone number etc. When you give that info to your bank or a service, they sell that information to marketing companies and data aggregators like Lexis Nexis, CLEAR, etc. Many of these people search sites just buy the data from these guys, or source them from leaks. I don't believe much of it comes from social media sites,

  • @DougGrinbergs
    @DougGrinbergs 10 місяців тому

    6:17 White Pages then vs now

  • @c-LAW
    @c-LAW Рік тому +9

    Isn't DeleteMe a data broker since they also collect all your personal information to battle tech companies who collect all your personal information?

    • @UNcommonSenseAUS
      @UNcommonSenseAUS Рік тому +6

      Ding!

    • @laurencefraser
      @laurencefraser Рік тому +6

      Comes down to a single outfit that Might be trustworthy vs many that definitely are not, I suppose.

    • @UNcommonSenseAUS
      @UNcommonSenseAUS Рік тому +3

      @@laurencefraser lol

    • @quickmythril2398
      @quickmythril2398 Рік тому +3

      @@laurencefraser reminds me of the VPN situation.

    • @adam.maqavoy
      @adam.maqavoy 12 днів тому

      By your definition - Is *Facebook* not a *Data broker?*

  • @zoenagy9458
    @zoenagy9458 Рік тому +6

    $129/year :D

    • @quickmythril2398
      @quickmythril2398 Рік тому +1

      oof, yeah no thanks. not sure why it needs to be recurring anyway. can't we just do it as a one-time? that kind of makes no sense.

    • @maxmustermann7365
      @maxmustermann7365 Рік тому +6

      If you pay for a recurring service, the payment must be recurring too, to be profitable.
      You probably can't go to a barber and pay once per lifetime either

  • @jacquelinemanzano9328
    @jacquelinemanzano9328 Рік тому +4

    Data Brokers are NOT immune from the law. They can , have been and will be sued by consumers for non disclosure and no, written, express or implied consent. These data brokers are committing a voluntary act by publishing your private and public information, there is no law that I can find that gives them authority, they simply assumed to role to do it for profit. So, I am going to assume the role of {Plaintiff and sue them for violations of my privacy and identity theft, since they have my private info without my consent.

    • @CatalinaFOIA
      @CatalinaFOIA 16 днів тому

      Should be a class action lawsuit against data brokers who post your information.

  • @uniquecintron3119
    @uniquecintron3119 2 місяці тому

    Who drinks out of a vase 😂

  • @M0rn1n6St4r
    @M0rn1n6St4r Рік тому +8

    Until I watched this interview, I had _no idea_ - Joe Rogan knows a lot about technology, _digital_ security, and privacy. 🐵

  • @gnawledge9083
    @gnawledge9083 Рік тому

    He didn't know the answer....

  • @CCCC-tq8yo
    @CCCC-tq8yo 9 днів тому

    Whow did u see there privacy and there right to sell ur date