The Real First 3D Printed Building (1930's)

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 29 вер 2024
  • Let's examine the patents and technology behind the Urschel wall building machine. We'll also discuss what this means for todays 3D Printed Construction industry as people compete to win patents for their 3D printed house technologies. The real OG was right here in America and his name was William E. Urschel. His company is still around today as a testament to the functionality and innovative nature of his designs although these days they are primarily focused on food processing.
    Sign up for the "How to 3D Print a House" course available now at the beta pricing!
    automate.const...
    Book a Consulting Call with Me
    jarettgross.yo...
    Check out my website
    automate.const...
    Free demo & signup link for the Virtual Village of 3D Printed Houses
    automate.const...
    Urschel UA-cam Channel
    / urschellabs

КОМЕНТАРІ • 153

  • @MrIzzyDizzy
    @MrIzzyDizzy 3 роки тому +9

    love the spinning smoother

  • @srmhetmketmk
    @srmhetmketmk 3 роки тому +62

    Woah! That looks better than most modern 3d printed walls.

    • @joe7272
      @joe7272 3 роки тому +1

      Add in a third guy who's job it is to sculpt corners and you got a very nice 'long brick' laying machine

    • @extraclip
      @extraclip 2 роки тому +5

      Why dont new 3d printers use the slicer tech the same way?

    • @thePavuk
      @thePavuk 11 місяців тому

      They are. Some use cutter on extruder that rotates parallel to trajectory of movement.

  • @cureworks
    @cureworks 3 роки тому +3

    Thanks Jarett Gross for this powerful history lesson. I too am in complete AWE!
    From what I see, the evolutionary leap we now call modern 3d printing happened when the construction print head met the CAD file, as in contour crafting.
    Information is transformation and the root history of the art form will make it easier for millions or more to understand what's going on and how we can best use these modern tools to save lives in the face of our climate emergency.
    This information will help LET THE PEOPLE PRINT!
    Please keep up your brilliant works. You are building a masterpiece of evidence for why we need to change now. GREAT JOB!

    • @cureworks
      @cureworks 3 роки тому +1

      Jarett Gross - If the theory of reincarnation is true, then you may have been one of them in a previous life. You're that good at what you do.
      The work you are doing is powerful. Thanks again.

    • @automateconstruction
      @automateconstruction  3 роки тому +1

      Thanks!

  • @I.no.ah.guy57
    @I.no.ah.guy57 9 місяців тому +1

    Wow thats awesome to learn about. How ahead of their time 😮 how did this not become more mainstream???

  • @budgetaudiophilelife-long5461
    @budgetaudiophilelife-long5461 3 роки тому +4

    AMAZING WHAT YOU HAVE DUG UP 🤗😍😍😍 THANKS JARRETT FOR YOUR 🧐 RESEARCH

  • @nikolaysalutski3270
    @nikolaysalutski3270 2 роки тому +1

    This is just brilliant Jarett! many thanks for sharing so much interesting and useful info...very much appreciated

  • @lasertagdreamer
    @lasertagdreamer 3 роки тому +3

    8:19
    They did not envisage a rotary bunker :)

  • @DubbelDutch1
    @DubbelDutch1 2 роки тому +1

    Great content in general! Thx Jarett

  • @mattmont1247
    @mattmont1247 3 роки тому +3

    it makes you wonder why this tech isn't more mainstream.

    • @KayoMichiels
      @KayoMichiels 3 роки тому +3

      Because back then.. it was not easy to get documentation.... now you can google almost everything.. but back then... yeah... mostly books or some magazines..

    • @automateconstruction
      @automateconstruction  3 роки тому +3

      Great point also they didn’t have all the excellent parametric design and slicing software we have today which increases the capabilities of the printer by many magnitudes.

    • @automateconstruction
      @automateconstruction  3 роки тому +1

      The homes being cheap point is a really good one too. There still isn’t detailed code for these buildings. There is an official statement saying it’s allowed and to be reviewed by the local municipality to determine whether or not to award the permit but it goes into no further detail.

    • @tragedyofwind
      @tragedyofwind 3 роки тому +4

      probably the same reason why we don't have composite material car or car with plastic cover for a long time. Because the industry is unwilling to change, especially the worker union.

    • @markzalavari1780
      @markzalavari1780 2 роки тому

      @Zen Economics I think it is not as hard to get building code for it. You need one for the material and one for the structure, that implies the tech behind. But if you have a company you can make this tech eligible to construct.

  • @donovandelaney3171
    @donovandelaney3171 Рік тому +1

    Anyone could bring that technology back into production.

  • @deafblindnoob2748
    @deafblindnoob2748 3 роки тому +3

    This end effector seems way more efficient and sophisticated than the simple nozzles today's printers use.

    • @automateconstruction
      @automateconstruction  3 роки тому +2

      On some level it has certain benefits however the need to manually load the concrete makes for a very imprecise mix and the wall is only as strong as the weakest layers so if the loader messes up then the whole thing is kind of ruined. Today they use more complex mixer pump systems that allow for a much greater degree of consistency. I think mixer pump systems are one of the biggest areas for improvement in this sector. At the end of the day automation is the name of the game so although loading directly into the extruder by hand is simple, a silo system or truck loaded system would be much more efficient.

    • @deafblindnoob2748
      @deafblindnoob2748 3 роки тому +2

      @@automateconstruction Of course the pump system is one of the integral parts and biggest advancements of today's printers. I only meant that the shown extrusion system seems to be superior to the simple nozzles of current printers.

    • @markzalavari1780
      @markzalavari1780 2 роки тому

      @@automateconstruction but here the material is also very simple. As I know "modern" 3D print materials are filled with additives to fullfil the printing consistency needs. But it is really solveable to use estrich pumps for a simple, "earth dry" mixture as well.

    • @heartobefelt
      @heartobefelt Рік тому +1

      @@automateconstruction If you look closely you can see the system moves forward driven by the compaction hammers hitting the laid product , If the loader is too slow to load the hopper the system will stop moving forwards so its an "auto detect drive interrupter".
      I actually cursed when i saw this video because i designed a center pivot system and thought i was the first .. lol
      Mine has rubber tyred drive wheels that roll on the floor slab , driven by a variable speed drive , inner and outer slipform molds , screw jack to raise the slipforms and a grout pump to feed the forms.
      My intention was for third world countries to build their own for cheap , They need the help more than Western Countries.
      I didnt think of their rotary wall polisher , mine is just a spring loaded trowel and rotary sponge with a water spray misting nozzle.
      The Urschel family would have grown up through the depression years of 1928 > so they had nothing much to work with and lots of spare time to have efficient innovative thought . Glad to read the family is still around.

  • @anubismva
    @anubismva Рік тому

    Hey Jarett Gross, where is the complete video. I only found 2 urschellabs' videos.

  • @donovandelaney3171
    @donovandelaney3171 Рік тому +1

    I wouldn’t be too surprised if it turned out that the Ancient Egyptians had the same technology.

  • @benjones5107
    @benjones5107 3 роки тому

    where can we get the plans to make this device.Is there someone that can build the tamper type. ? ready to get this machine ,here in Oregon

  • @juliamarsh2077
    @juliamarsh2077 Рік тому +1

    Wow, do any of these buildings still exist? if they do, what condition are they in?

    • @automateconstruction
      @automateconstruction  Рік тому

      I interacted with the grandson of William Urschel, a company owns the land it’s on now and built over the original structure. I may get to visit one day theres not much evidence left.

  • @thePavuk
    @thePavuk 11 місяців тому

    So... why it doesn't success? It looks like they solved everything.

  • @skillworldwide
    @skillworldwide Рік тому

    2d concrete pouring is more accurate.

    • @automateconstruction
      @automateconstruction  Рік тому

      Tamping is the most accurate

    • @skillworldwide
      @skillworldwide Рік тому +1

      @@automateconstruction wrong. Those day dont have automation and cnc concept. Topping up with guilder is exactly the word. Similar concept derived from soil and mud wall used thousands of years before.

  • @Mikeesocal69
    @Mikeesocal69 3 роки тому +22

    You hit the nail on the head. The Urschel companies 3d printer is definitely well thought out, especially for the time 1930.

  • @julienboucaron9780
    @julienboucaron9780 3 роки тому +13

    Thank you for sharing this gem. Pretty elegant design. This kind of mixer/extruder can be very useful to experiment with a larger range of materials.

  • @Corum001
    @Corum001 3 роки тому +3

    The reason we get surprised about the cleaver past is because of the arrogant now.

  • @matthewglaysher6081
    @matthewglaysher6081 3 роки тому +5

    I imagine these buildings are long gone. If not would be interesting to pay a visit. What part of the country is this?

  • @marsgizmo
    @marsgizmo 2 роки тому +3

    This is pretty incredible Jarret! 👏😎 Thanks for showcasing it!

  • @robbenson7034
    @robbenson7034 3 роки тому +8

    How has the printed builds held up over the years? Cracks, structure failures ?

    • @floobertuber
      @floobertuber 3 роки тому +4

      Came here to ask the same. If the company is still around, surely somebody knows the answer to this!

    • @automateconstruction
      @automateconstruction  3 роки тому +9

      Looking into it.

  • @Comm0ut
    @Comm0ut 2 роки тому +2

    That's not really printing it's linear pouring without forms but the video title will get more views. It's a circular variation on linear kerb casting machines (see videos) but VERY elegant in its exceptional simplicity. Had the inventors used it for kerbs they'd have made millions because the machine is compact and mobile. It could run on any track straight or curved to produce any desired kerb of any reasonable size. It's a fascinating machine so thanks very much for posting. A competent fabricator could assemble one inexpensively and the limitation of round structures (round "rooms" are best for tanks and silos) bypassed by using modern reinforced (fiberglass for light work, steel for heavier work) concrete.

    • @automateconstruction
      @automateconstruction  2 роки тому +1

      It’s very hard to convince modern engineers to agree with bypassing modern reinforcement. You totally understand the UA-cam title game haha. I try not to spin it too much.

  • @psilonautika
    @psilonautika 3 роки тому +8

    Brilliant history and research! Thanks Jarett as always!

  • @AircreteHarry
    @AircreteHarry 3 роки тому +3

    I saw this video a year ago and hoped no one saw it(Thanks Jarett)lol. I want to make one myself the walls come out smooth no pancake look.

  • @joe7272
    @joe7272 3 роки тому +2

    Soooo sell this hopper fed wall printing machine, and let the user add their own tube feed system!!

  • @xwilly5552
    @xwilly5552 3 роки тому +8

    Great share, Jarett!!
    I too thought that this tech was something developed over maybe the last decade or so.
    Keep up the great work; your videos are my go-to when it comes to this subject.

    • @automateconstruction
      @automateconstruction  3 роки тому +4

      Thanks I will!

    • @eiennofantasy
      @eiennofantasy 3 роки тому +2

      Afaik, modern 3d printing has actually exists since the 80s but had been patented so it was not commercially available and widespread as we know it now. Correct me if I'm wrong here please!

  • @brandonfigueroa7399
    @brandonfigueroa7399 3 роки тому +5

    another great episode. someone should recreate this inch by inch.

  • @ericlajoie8028
    @ericlajoie8028 3 роки тому +3

    Found a new favorite channel!!! Awesome job on the video dude!!!

  • @TheWalkOnCoach
    @TheWalkOnCoach 3 роки тому +4

    This one really is a banger

  • @shawntilluck
    @shawntilluck 3 роки тому +2

    Hang on that machine may be able to 3D print Hempcrete. You have to find some to make one!

  • @johnparrish9215
    @johnparrish9215 3 роки тому +4

    I'll give you one that everyone thinks is modern, Electronic Fuel Injection in cars. Everyone thinks that happened in the 80s but no it happened in 1958 by Chrysler before the computer was small enough to fit in a car. It worked great in the lab but in real life, the electromagnetic waves produced by high-power electrical lines would shut your engine down so almost all were recalled and replaced.

    • @joe7272
      @joe7272 3 роки тому +1

      It's hilarious how early vs modern electrical problems compare

    • @АртемЕкимов-щ5с
      @АртемЕкимов-щ5с 4 місяці тому

      Добрый день. Технологии открываются - иследуются - внедряются в повседневность. Этот процес может расстянуться на несколько веков. Так как технология рассматривается не только с технической точки зрения но и с социальной. Понятие электричество введено в 1600 году. Внедрение в повседневность - начало 20 века.

  • @RickyDownhillRDH
    @RickyDownhillRDH 2 роки тому +3

    That's pretty amazing, I had no idea they were doing this. Look how refined the outside and inside finishing of the concrete is. I don't know if you said it or not in the video, but are these still standing today?

  • @joe7272
    @joe7272 3 роки тому +2

    NGL modern 3d printing construction companies can learn from the simplicty of this design. Who cares if there is "zero" human hands on construction, what if it's 1/30th the number of people? Hiring 2 guys to toss premix into a hopper is hellofa lot easier than maintenence and monitoring of a modern 3d printed house. This old tech is also stronger and better insulating.

  • @---Snaporaz---
    @---Snaporaz--- 3 роки тому +2

    9:59 😂 make a collab, " highest 3d printed structure in the world!!! "

  • @tonyarcus
    @tonyarcus 3 роки тому +3

    Jarett, I have known for a while that Ihad to do some binge watching of your videos. I have a project that I am writing up at the moment for a three D printed village, however it is so involved I think I am at least five years away, and a lot of research. I would rather spend time on this project than watch Mr Beast Videos. But who am I kidding, i'll do both.

    • @automateconstruction
      @automateconstruction  3 роки тому +3

      Enjoy! I wish I could make my videos as entertaining as his increasing my average watch time would be really helpful to grow my channel.

  • @shawntilluck
    @shawntilluck 3 роки тому +2

    It is not just that they were years ahead of the 3D printing revolution, but their inventions were compacting and shaping dirt and plastics. Years ahead of today's trend to find "Green Materials and strategies " for building homes and such.

  • @EarthlyF0rg0ten
    @EarthlyF0rg0ten 3 роки тому +3

    Well this really took off

    • @automateconstruction
      @automateconstruction  3 роки тому +2

      They didn’t have the software to truly utilize what they had.

    • @EarthlyF0rg0ten
      @EarthlyF0rg0ten 3 роки тому +1

      @@automateconstruction I get that I was referring to the views. Had 50 when I first watched it. Shared it all day.

    • @automateconstruction
      @automateconstruction  3 роки тому +2

      @@EarthlyF0rg0ten thanks! I thought you were being sarcastic, I appreciate the early support! Analytics show 60% of the views are actually coming from Google search!

    • @EarthlyF0rg0ten
      @EarthlyF0rg0ten 3 роки тому +1

      @@automateconstruction it happens we can't really convey tone over text without emojis 😆

  • @linusmcmanamey5
    @linusmcmanamey5 3 роки тому +3

    Brilliant. Great research.

  • @Crosshatch1212
    @Crosshatch1212 Рік тому +1

    Well the windexe machine is now being made in Austria and Australia,will be finished in one week from today 19,4,2023

  • @martinwashington3152
    @martinwashington3152 Рік тому +1

    I actually thought "patents" if that's correct were only useful for a term of 25 years and that's If you kept up the subscription costs paid yearly, after that someone else can re-patent what you had prior.. I only say and mention this is because it's what family slate me over and it's not worth wasting monies obtaining patent, they just want a quick-cash money flow notion going for business.
    So am assuming after 25 years anyone can copy something else of others design.

  • @JMGrimm
    @JMGrimm 3 роки тому +3

    Is the building in this video still standing? If so, where is it?

  • @alexandermoisessaldanaacev3303
    @alexandermoisessaldanaacev3303 3 роки тому +5

    Es realmente asombroso, muchas veces he escuchado que solo estamos redescubriendo las cosas, pues hubo un pasado tecnológico. Muchas gracias por compartir éste video. Tal vez el proximo paso sea tener edificios construidos de una sola pieza debido a la union quimica de sus partes de forma que queden completamente unidas. Saludos.

  • @jasenkoh76
    @jasenkoh76 3 роки тому +2

    Awesome video,i am impressed!
    Thanks for sharing!

  • @greggv8
    @greggv8 Рік тому +1

    Make the head able to rotate on a vertical axis and the arm able to vary in length. Add CNC operation and it's a polar 3D concrete printer. Vase mode concrete printing. ;) Something other than the spinning discs would be needed to accommodate variable turn radii. Might be a way to make it do sharp corners with the way it can be stopped and restarted.

  • @alirezakashani5410
    @alirezakashani5410 3 роки тому +3

    It was a very interesting footage. Thanks Jarett.

  • @metacombs
    @metacombs 3 роки тому +1

    I wonder if those buildings are still there. Maybe Google earth could help.

  • @shawntilluck
    @shawntilluck 3 роки тому +1

    An interesting plot twist would be someone 3D printing some of the parts to make this.

  •  3 роки тому +7

    What a great find! Instant classic, IMO. OG of 3D printing structures. Also makes me a bit sad realizing that apparently there has been little to no progress for over half a century since then and we're only now starting to see this idea revived.

  • @shawntilluck
    @shawntilluck 3 роки тому +1

    Most of the 3D concrete printers you have demonstrated so far have had one "Head" printing a single thing (concrete), but their designs incorporates placing the reinforcing steel as well. Does that mean they have the first "Dual Head" or "Multi-Head" 3D concrete printer?

  • @shawntilluck
    @shawntilluck 3 роки тому +1

    Great work! Try to have some one transfer the patient drawings to CAD, and feature is on you website!

  • @ALominsky
    @ALominsky Рік тому

    This is absolutely amazing! Thank you for sharing this video!🥰🙏🙏🙏

  • @3DPT
    @3DPT 3 роки тому +3

    This has gone viral across the 3D printing community.. Where is the source for the original video? Library of Congress? I checked the Urschel site, they don't have the video posted.

    • @automateconstruction
      @automateconstruction  3 роки тому +3

      I have the link to their youtube channel with the original video in the description.

    • @3DPT
      @3DPT 3 роки тому +2

      @@automateconstruction Thank you, I found it buried in the Urschel Channel. Do you know if any of the printed buildings are still around?

  • @3dpprofessor
    @3dpprofessor Рік тому +1

    Is this really 3D printing? I mean, it's technically moving around the X and Y technically, but it really only has 2 movements it can do, a polar movement around the center, and Z. This is really just a flat wall wound around on itself. I couldn't do rooms or other things.
    I mean, it's cool, but technically, not 3D.

    • @automateconstruction
      @automateconstruction  Рік тому

      Technically not 3D printing, you are correct. From my understanding this is mostly because there is no G-code or digital tool path.

    • @3dpprofessor
      @3dpprofessor Рік тому

      @@automateconstruction I know that's how many people define 3D printing, but I prefer a tech-agnostic definition. GCode is just a way of communicating movement. Markus Kayser made an inspirational laser cutter that used shaped disks to define the movement of the X and Y gantry. Totally non-digital, and no gcode, but a comparable enough process that I wouldn't say "that's not a laser cutter, it doesn't use GCode".
      Also, his used the sun, and the sun is a deadly laser.

    • @automateconstruction
      @automateconstruction  Рік тому

      ​@@3dpprofessoryes that is a laser cutter but it is not CNC

    • @3dpprofessor
      @3dpprofessor Рік тому

      @@automateconstruction That's true.

  • @manuel56354
    @manuel56354 2 роки тому +1

    Really like the idea of exploring old patented machines

  • @brandonfigueroa7399
    @brandonfigueroa7399 3 роки тому +2

    i want one

  • @friedaspyder8485
    @friedaspyder8485 3 роки тому +2

    That was cool Jarett. Thanks.

  • @igotatan1
    @igotatan1 Рік тому +1

    Much appreciated tech from a century ago. I want one to build a dome home on pillars... Perfect for floods, and hurricanes.

  • @didierfertil6334
    @didierfertil6334 2 роки тому +1

    Hello from France. Do you know if they have made some sillages silos with this technique in the 40' in some Us dairy stages ?

  • @josephstinebaugh9867
    @josephstinebaugh9867 3 роки тому +1

    Does the building exist to today?

  • @ChielScape
    @ChielScape 2 роки тому +1

    "about 70 years late"
    1930s to 2020s is a 70 year gap now?

    • @automateconstruction
      @automateconstruction  2 роки тому +1

      No, in 2000 contour crafting started 3D printing concrete again.

  • @kaviator
    @kaviator 15 днів тому

    Notice they didn't need computers. Also, they had a strong sense of humor. Truly remarkable how ahead of its time this was!

  • @aydanaliev5723
    @aydanaliev5723 3 роки тому +2

    Good job thanks for the good video

  • @CUBETechie
    @CUBETechie 2 роки тому +1

    It would be used for Clay too

  • @willyng911
    @willyng911 Рік тому +1

    Ain't rocket science, that for sure! Love it! Can't stop watching it!

  • @gregf6297
    @gregf6297 2 роки тому

    I haven't read through all the other comments to see if it has been mentioned, so in any event this will be newer:
    Patents expire after 20 years and they can not be "renewed". The patent on the tongue and groove expired in the 70s. "Exclusive rights" claims by other companies, however, is BS.

  • @wnfernand
    @wnfernand Місяць тому

    This something way beyond their years..excellent innovations

  • @StephenCoorlas
    @StephenCoorlas 2 роки тому

    Wait... What?! This is amazing!

  • @Pumpkin-Brain
    @Pumpkin-Brain Рік тому

    Do you know if any of the buildings from the 1930’s still exist?

  • @billsauer3164
    @billsauer3164 2 місяці тому

    And yet there's people today that claimed to be the first ones to use this technology LOL

  • @MrNikke96
    @MrNikke96 3 роки тому +1

    Hey, this is a long shot but what the hell.
    I´m a civil engineer student in Finland doing my thesis on 3D-printing construction and you have been bulk of my information on the thesis! (dont worry you are in the references)
    But if you wanted to hop on a teams chat some day in the next few weeks for a chat that would be super! :D id record the chat but only for my own notes so there will only be text out of the conversation.
    Anyway, i really like your stuff and im grateful for your work that im kinda piggy backing on :D
    Edit: and of course i wrote this before watching the video where you inform how to get a call with you, but unfurtunally i dont have money to spare :(

    • @automateconstruction
      @automateconstruction  3 роки тому +1

      Shoot me an email via jarett@3dprinted.construction I may not have time for a video call but at the very least I can answer some questions via email.

  • @justanumber427
    @justanumber427 3 роки тому +1

    super cool!! looks better than modern equivalent!

  • @jairoantoniofictoriejovel4298

    Vergona esa época dorada de Vida de gente Sana laboriosa y de calories vivan los 1930s

  • @amagro9495
    @amagro9495 Рік тому

    Not only the first 3D print construction, the also the first non planar!

  • @aviatormaxim
    @aviatormaxim 3 місяці тому

    Илон Маск? Чел, эту технологию придумали в США в 1939 в штате Индиана

  • @billdavis9612
    @billdavis9612 Рік тому +1

    The Vidett-Messenger, Valparaiso, Indiana, January 29, 1977 has a special section on "Progress." On page 26 of that section (page 46 of online image) it shows a map of the Urschel building at 158 S. Napoleon Street in Valparaiso when the building was to be sold and rehabilitated by an architectural firm. The map shows behind that building a "castle-shaped garage" and an "igloo" next to the railroad tracks. A current view shows those structures are now gone, but the map suggests that they were still there in 1977. The main building still contains a curved wall that Urschel incorporated into his building in 1939, constructed with his 3-D method.

    • @automateconstruction
      @automateconstruction  Рік тому

      Wow very insightful thank you for sharing this!

    • @billdavis9612
      @billdavis9612 Рік тому

      @@automateconstruction Google Maps Street view car drove behind the building, so you can see the upper part of the two-story curved wall in the building.

    • @automateconstruction
      @automateconstruction  Рік тому

      @@billdavis9612 Wow how can you be sure the curved portion was printed? It seems very likely but is there further evidence? I will try to stop by in person.

    • @billdavis9612
      @billdavis9612 Рік тому

      @@automateconstruction The map says that portion of the building was built in 1939, which is the date I've seen given for his demonstration films, and somewhere in the course of my searches it said that part of the building was constructed using that process. A modern aerial view also looks like there MIGHT be a serpentine retaining wall nearby, which makes me wonder if it that was also created with this method.

    • @billdavis9612
      @billdavis9612 Рік тому

      @@automateconstruction The text below the map in the newspaper I cited before says the main building was added to in sections, "often using construction methods he invented."

  • @isaacsegura
    @isaacsegura 5 місяців тому

    it looks like 1950 movie, there were no color in 1930

  • @jairoantoniofictoriejovel4298

    Vergona esa maquina pa contruir edificaciones casas, edificios cualquier cosa

  • @briangschaefer7048
    @briangschaefer7048 9 місяців тому

    Great video, Jarett. Thank you :)

  • @WeberMachineWorks
    @WeberMachineWorks 9 місяців тому

    Does anyone have any idea about the cement mix?

  • @jairoantoniofictoriejovel4298

    ¡Qué vergona esa maquinaria sin andarse jodiendose tanto!

  • @jameshouse2909
    @jameshouse2909 6 місяців тому

    That was so interesting! These guys were true pioneers.

  • @jairoantoniofictoriejovel4298

    Vergón el video qué a color en los 1930s

  • @serbanmike
    @serbanmike 3 роки тому +1

    Hey Jarret,
    Write a book about 3D printing ,. History, methods developed along time, materials, etc.. You have pictures
    You will tell in what fields these 3D printed constructions are/were used. It's going to an interesting book.

    • @automateconstruction
      @automateconstruction  3 роки тому

      I think I will!

    • @serbanmike
      @serbanmike 3 роки тому

      @@automateconstruction
      Please do. you have so much material and knowledge gathered on this subject.. You can contact companies that you visited and for sure they will give you info which is not proprietary. This will keep you busy for a while.
      Good luck !

  • @oakld
    @oakld 2 роки тому +1

    Nice! I like Jarett's work very much, even though I don't share all the enthusiasm about 3D printing. Really good videos!

    • @automateconstruction
      @automateconstruction  2 роки тому +1

      I’m more interested in construction automation I will try to diversify my content beyond 3d stuff.

    • @oakld
      @oakld 2 роки тому

      @@automateconstruction Looking forward to that!

  • @bearnaff9387
    @bearnaff9387 2 роки тому

    Hilarious thing to note: Another piece of film of this process just turned up on the 3D printing subreddit. Apparently, Urschel's grandson is not only still involved in the company, he's active on the subreddit. Formless construction is apparently in the Urschel blood!

  • @alexanderstrelets8234
    @alexanderstrelets8234 2 роки тому

    Человек, как всегда, занимается самой ответственной частью работы :)

  • @impresiones3D
    @impresiones3D 3 роки тому

    Thanks for the video 🙌🏼

  • @ADOENDRA
    @ADOENDRA 2 роки тому

    I wonder if these buildings still exist?

    • @automateconstruction
      @automateconstruction  2 роки тому

      One of them does, I am talking to the grandson of William to see if I can find it.

    • @ADOENDRA
      @ADOENDRA 2 роки тому

      @@automateconstruction That would be cool ! Thanks

  • @ДмитрийЛебенков-ы1ы

    круто