Not really that big of a difference, the acceleration phase is the most time consuming in this application. The traveltime difference should be only like 200ms higher. But the most important, the supply of cocaine and amphetamine does most likely not have infinite buffer so it makes sense to load both at the same time.
You only had to do 1 thing right over and over to not be replaced by a machine. You still managed to screw that up over and over. That's why the machine has your job now.
And here it goes my dream of becoming palletizing sorter PD: i am actually joking. I am a computer science undergrad who also happens to have taken Robotics module this semester and got of the highest highest mark in the class :)
@@moreclips805 bete operator ki salary nhi pta h tujhe lagta h. It is less than 10k, even labour earns double than this and this machine eated more than 10 peoples job
@@moreclips805, I work in technology too. These machines most definitely don't create more jobs overall. More technology jobs, sure. More jobs overall, no way. It's common sense really. Why would a company invest in these machines if they replaced fewer low wage jobs with more high wage jobs? That would never happen. The whole point of using technology in business is to do things more efficiently. More efficiently, by definition, means less work/money is required to get the same end results. Less work means less WORKers. This one robot replaces at least two humans working full time. If it operates 24 hours a day it is covering 3 shifts x 2 workers = 48 man hours per day = 6 full time jobs minimum. The tech people that install and support these things probably only spend a handful of hours a month dealing with this machine at most. And it isn't an issue of "being lazy." A lot of people (most people) are not cut out for programming work or advanced technology in general. As this kind of technology advances and continues to replace human jobs, society is going to have to figure out how to adjust so that society overall benefits from these advances and not just the people who own the machines.
i estimate the rate in video to be 17 bags per minute. this looks almost perfect (only two places show slowdown - after dropping the bag). we have done same job using same robot that does 25-26 bags per minute. not quite the double speed but some 40% faster. the motion speed in this video seem to be purposely reduced since feed rate is not too high so no point in stressing the robot and burning energy if it can keep up.
Concur. To reduce wasted motion, the arm should be focused on palletizing one load at a time. Maybe switch lines in-between pallet swaps. There's probably something where there isn't enough storage or start-stop capability in either line to accommodate unloading one line at a time.
@@bosef1 So, if the stacker is keeping up with both lines, what does it matter? SUre, you could probably make it a little more efficient from a time and motion standpoint, but unless you could save enough time that it could stack from 3 lines instead of 2, or the current stacking process is slowing the entire process .. what does it matter?
yeah :D i agree, it is ineffizient 2 Robots Arms would be better there, i played Factorio :D and was thinking the same and looked for someone who see it too. nice
@@X11-35-2 up to 2m/s in linear moves, ptp can be faster but that still isnt fast... other brands (kawasaki for example) can move with the full speed even in linear moves🤷♂️
The stacks are interlocked, less chance of them toppling over, making them much safer. Thsn if they were just stacked straight up one top of each other. Its similar to staggered brick walls as opposed to non staggered walls. A staggered wall is far stronger
@@MinkieWinkle I'm talking about the arm rotating the bags 180 degrees so they are facing the opposite way, I can understand rotating 90 degrees to make the pattern, but 180? It might as well spin it 360... only a 0 or 90 degree rotation is ever needed but the arm rotates some of them 180, the bag is surely identical for packing purposes in either position, so why rotate it at all?
@@pramotexp Thats definitely high volume. But the velocity of the movements does not look like the highest imaginable. Its a simple robot goddammit. It should be abnormaly fast. These bags and pellets are normed. Everything it does is predictable and controllable. Nessecary hardware is accessible (chips, sensors, joints, motors, conveyor belts..) or can be build with existing knowlege, same for the software I guess. If one lightning fast unit can do he work of 10 regular production facilities, we get more output wih less ressources. Thats good for everybody and everything I suppose. We can live without high speed machinery. But isn't life better with it? At he moment technological advancement eases chores that wouldnt exsist without it. Repetitive human labour in a shoe factory can be automazied gradually but wouldnt exsist if shoe makers would work in their craft room. Then, on the other hand, only mass prouction can lower he prices so much that most people can afford a basic version of almost everyhing and not seldom a lot of it. Every year you have multiple pairs of shoes at your behalf. In the middleages shoes where passed on from father to son (not exclusively of course). So higher material standart of living came at the expense of something that can be thinked of as the joy of work. (Is this true?) If machinery of zhe future can fulfill our materialstic needs and wants (read: food, shelter, transport, medicine..), thereby constantly freeing more people of performing manual labour - then we as human societies can devote more time and attention to social and artesian contexts of human interaction. Otherwise, giving away contol of the provision of our livlyhood by leaving it to a.i. is to big of a risk. (Is it?) Humanity must advance in thoughts first. What can be depends on our imagination. Ask how a better world looks like and how you can be part of it already. "Don't say something should be done. Do." -S. "Be the change you want to see in the world." -G.
@@marcelluswallace4076 if it is already as fast as the input/upstream capacity, then making it faster just means it will be waiting more, and put more load/wear on the components and increase the chance of something going wrong. It can probably go faster(and perhaps the speed is even modulated based on the backlog of bags), but there is no point
You only had to do 1 thing right over and over to not be replaced by a machine. You still managed to screw that up over and over. That's why the machine has your job now.
this is KUKA 5-axis palletizer with KRC4 controller. Robot arm is most likely KR180R3200PA (180kg payload, 3.2m reach, palletizer). similar arms for other payloads exist as well. older models are 4-axis and needed more space due exposed linking arms. this is a beautiful machine, low maintenance and very very nice.
@@briancherry1 6 people at say 40k/Yr would be 240k every year, plus overheads, so maybe at least 50-200% more on top of that. Maybe the robot lasts 10 years (probably more), so equivalent is then more than 2.4 million + overheads(or leave them out to compensate for robot overheads/maintenance). And the robot will be nearly perfectly consistent the whole time. If it uses 10 kW continuous (possible, but I personally expect less), then it costs 25000/Yr in electricity (assuming 30c/unit)
The path and cross over every item isn’t needed , by reducing the clearance hight , , given travel time as well one layer at at a time per side may also reduce loading times we are talking a second here or so but multiplied it can also on return the device goes back to x point before reaching for another at point y, that process can be reduced further lowing op time. It’s a very broad outline I strongly suggest simulating in the relevant tools first to see what I mean
the sad part is that someone would do this back breaking job when it can be done by machine. this job is lost but others are created. someone had to design and build the robot, design and build the cell, program cell, do a safety assessment, market it, maintain it, train etc. it is a good thing that labor intensive, monotone and repetitive jobs like these are lost to machines. work smarter not harder.
@@xy7571 10 hours 4 days a week and then the factory shuts down? No. You have a second team that goes on when they go off. Then 2 more teams that work for the 3 days that those 2 teams are off. So looking at 16 men to work 24/7, all men that need breaks, lunch hours, overtime pay etc. The robot is so so so much cheaper in the long run. It's not even close.
i watched one High speed robot video and now my feed in full of this stuff.
Me too lol, but I prefer to get this as recommended instead of some tiktok shit
the robot overlord is giving us vision, we are the chosen ones
feel you, i watched ONE kuka video and now spammmmmmm
That’s how it works
Well, you clicked this video as well, looks like it worked!
Would have been a blessing for Escobar.
I wish the Kuka robots moved this fast at my work. Lucky to drill and fill one hole every 5 minutes.
Sounds like bad programming. You should be able to bump up your cycle time.
Its interesting to note that if you got in its way, it will go through you without missing a single step.
There's safety faults for torsion overload, yeah it would hurt like hell when it hits you but it wouldn't continue.
there is most likely light curtains calibrated for the operation area of the robot so if anything trips it, it will stop
There are multiple light curtains on the fences that will issue a robot hold
Robot: I was born to do this
Luddites: He doesn't realize the gravity of the issue
Точность его работы просто поражает.Грузщик больше не нужен!
100 % )
I don’t like that robots attitude!!! It should be more grateful to have a job!!!
Wouldn't it be quicker to stack each row at a time instead of alternating between them? less distance between each stack
There must be a reason for doing it this way.
Trust me, the engineers know what they doing.
@@PacificoAyala321 "trust me I'm an engineer"
Not really that big of a difference, the acceleration phase is the most time consuming in this application. The traveltime difference should be only like 200ms higher. But the most important, the supply of cocaine and amphetamine does most likely not have infinite buffer so it makes sense to load both at the same time.
intentional slow down so the line can keep up with the robot.
Probably better than having an entire pallet of bags queued up on the conveyor
I don't know what the youtube algorithm is doing to me but at this point I'm not even gonna fight it
neiter am I
It’s evolving…it’s trying to tell us our days are numbered
They toke aur jobs! Derka derka!
You only had to do 1 thing right over and over to not be replaced by a machine. You still managed to screw that up over and over.
That's why the machine has your job now.
They forgot to say you need to set the watch speed to x2
And this is why when you buy a bag of soil it always leaks dirt in your car. ;-)
And here it goes my dream of becoming palletizing sorter
PD: i am actually joking. I am a computer science undergrad who also happens to have taken Robotics module this semester and got of the highest highest mark in the class :)
While I know you’re kidding, technology creates more jobs than it destroys- higher paying wages, less work 💪
Become a pallet sorter technician 😂
or just be faster 24/7 ;)
@@moreclips805 bete operator ki salary nhi pta h tujhe lagta h. It is less than 10k, even labour earns double than this and this machine eated more than 10 peoples job
@@moreclips805 ..wrong
@@moreclips805, I work in technology too. These machines most definitely don't create more jobs overall. More technology jobs, sure. More jobs overall, no way. It's common sense really. Why would a company invest in these machines if they replaced fewer low wage jobs with more high wage jobs? That would never happen. The whole point of using technology in business is to do things more efficiently. More efficiently, by definition, means less work/money is required to get the same end results. Less work means less WORKers.
This one robot replaces at least two humans working full time. If it operates 24 hours a day it is covering 3 shifts x 2 workers = 48 man hours per day = 6 full time jobs minimum. The tech people that install and support these things probably only spend a handful of hours a month dealing with this machine at most.
And it isn't an issue of "being lazy." A lot of people (most people) are not cut out for programming work or advanced technology in general. As this kind of technology advances and continues to replace human jobs, society is going to have to figure out how to adjust so that society overall benefits from these advances and not just the people who own the machines.
👍very productive. No tiresome for that repetition. how about maintenance, such as lubrication, etc?
Pls share your email
Daily maintenance
It's having gears like in the rear axle, I don't know about oil used in this case,
This is even more impressive at 2x video speed
i estimate the rate in video to be 17 bags per minute. this looks almost perfect (only two places show slowdown - after dropping the bag). we have done same job using same robot that does 25-26 bags per minute. not quite the double speed but some 40% faster. the motion speed in this video seem to be purposely reduced since feed rate is not too high so no point in stressing the robot and burning energy if it can keep up.
Why do they split the paths into chunks where they stop inbetween? Seems like a waste of time and energy to me
Concur. To reduce wasted motion, the arm should be focused on palletizing one load at a time. Maybe switch lines in-between pallet swaps. There's probably something where there isn't enough storage or start-stop capability in either line to accommodate unloading one line at a time.
@@bosef1 So, if the stacker is keeping up with both lines, what does it matter? SUre, you could probably make it a little more efficient from a time and motion standpoint, but unless you could save enough time that it could stack from 3 lines instead of 2, or the current stacking process is slowing the entire process .. what does it matter?
Get a purple one and you can go even faster.
Here goes the jobs!!
yes stupid, back breaking jobs. but here come the the jobs for skilled people.
@@ivicakvasina4957 what we fear is terminator type robots that can repair itself and think better than humans
Dey terk err jerbs!
The way its dropping those pallets, looks like its fed up
You have a approximation bug in your robot code on the left palletizing position. The robot should not stop
I'm gonna just order one of these up for my cement mixer....
A little truth in advertising - robot is running at 17 bags/min, not 20. Still a very good rate!
At first I was like; this is over engineered, _why are these guys using a robot of that magnitude to pack pillows?_ 😂😂😂
Factorio flashbacks
It would be better of doing one pallet at a time
Could be faster, but the robot is likely already fast enough for the remaining production line.
yeah :D i agree, it is ineffizient 2 Robots Arms would be better there, i played Factorio :D and was thinking the same and looked for someone who see it too. nice
The pallets seem to carry different bags
The good old windows movie maker
That robot just left my moms house !
employee of the month?
$15 an hour!
That's it easy teaching I seen with Kuka robot
Streching as well provided?
Hola tendria mas datos para poder comprar la maquina
Seems, that chinese technology (kuka is a subsidiary of the chinese mother company midea) conquers the world.
was here Pallettech used?
Imagine if you across the path of this robot 😵
Hanzhen harmonic gear , industrial robot arm gear reducer
Expected higher speed
inserter inserting into two chests? is this some mod or what?
On left side the robot stop every time on right side work better.
it stops on both sides
택배 상하차 알바가 환장할 장비네...
How much his salary?
That isn't really fast😅 our kawasaki bx200l has a similar range, 200kg of payload in all 6 degrees of freedom and moves faster😂
I guess that could be faster too, kuka moves with up to 2m/s
@@X11-35-2 up to 2m/s in linear moves, ptp can be faster but that still isnt fast... other brands (kawasaki for example) can move with the full speed even in linear moves🤷♂️
But this is recorded in slomotion.
Camera work induces motion sickness. Use a wider angle with less camera movement. Tracking fast objects makes it unwatchable.
How much does something like this cost?
for one robot 1 input and 1 output shoud be around 100K USD
@@pramotexpI can do for less
Why does it bother turning some of them 180 degrees? Seems pointless
The stacks are interlocked, less chance of them toppling over, making them much safer. Thsn if they were just stacked straight up one top of each other. Its similar to staggered brick walls as opposed to non staggered walls. A staggered wall is far stronger
@@MinkieWinkle I'm talking about the arm rotating the bags 180 degrees so they are facing the opposite way, I can understand rotating 90 degrees to make the pattern, but 180? It might as well spin it 360... only a 0 or 90 degree rotation is ever needed but the arm rotates some of them 180, the bag is surely identical for packing purposes in either position, so why rotate it at all?
Its to be able to load two different pallets, and to preserve momentum, which ends up being more energetically efficient.
Este robot va terminar con dolor de espada y reumas
y tambien con mucho trabajo que hacia la gente
pero bueno
habra que evolucionar y estudiar para hacer otras cosas
I expected high speed
for 1 infeed 1 outfeed robot can handele around 1200 bag per hour
@@pramotexp
Thats definitely high volume. But the velocity of the movements does not look like the highest imaginable. Its a simple robot goddammit. It should be abnormaly fast. These bags and pellets are normed. Everything it does is predictable and controllable. Nessecary hardware is accessible (chips, sensors, joints, motors, conveyor belts..) or can be build with existing knowlege, same for the software I guess.
If one lightning fast unit can do he work of 10 regular production facilities, we get more output wih less ressources. Thats good for everybody and everything I suppose.
We can live without high speed machinery. But isn't life better with it?
At he moment technological advancement eases chores that wouldnt exsist without it. Repetitive human labour in a shoe factory can be automazied gradually but wouldnt exsist if shoe makers would work in their craft room. Then, on the other hand, only mass prouction can lower he prices so much that most people can afford a basic version of almost everyhing and not seldom a lot of it. Every year you have multiple pairs of shoes at your behalf. In the middleages shoes where passed on from father to son (not exclusively of course). So higher material standart of living came at the expense of something that can be thinked of as the joy of work. (Is this true?)
If machinery of zhe future can fulfill our materialstic needs and wants (read: food, shelter, transport, medicine..), thereby constantly freeing more people of performing manual labour - then we as human societies can devote more time and attention to social and artesian contexts of human interaction. Otherwise, giving away contol of the provision of our livlyhood by leaving it to a.i. is to big of a risk. (Is it?)
Humanity must advance in thoughts first. What can be depends on our imagination. Ask how a better world looks like and how you can be part of it already.
"Don't say something should be done. Do." -S.
"Be the change you want to see in the world." -G.
@@marcelluswallace4076 if it is already as fast as the input/upstream capacity, then making it faster just means it will be waiting more, and put more load/wear on the components and increase the chance of something going wrong.
It can probably go faster(and perhaps the speed is even modulated based on the backlog of bags), but there is no point
@@jackaw1197 exactly.
You only had to do 1 thing right over and over to not be replaced by a machine. You still managed to screw that up over and over.
That's why the machine has your job now.
Which model is it ?
this is KUKA 5-axis palletizer with KRC4 controller. Robot arm is most likely KR180R3200PA (180kg payload, 3.2m reach, palletizer). similar arms for other payloads exist as well. older models are 4-axis and needed more space due exposed linking arms. this is a beautiful machine, low maintenance and very very nice.
I’m sure it’s cheaper to buy an actual palletizer instead of a robot.
someone with a name like sandwichtube you must be knowledgeable about automation.
Telling my kids this 9is how the pyramids were made
🇩🇪❤
so fast
Is anybody in Miami?
no
yes
Did you know a word "kuka" means lift or pick up
In my language
Nice! But the name is actually an acronym for "Keller und Knappich Augsburg" (Keller & Knappich from Augsburg)
In hungarian kuka means trash can/dumpster
@@gaborperak2333 These KUKA robots might be hard to sell in Hungary due to the name.
I've seen a guy do this faster with 1 shoulder and drinking tea!
Nailed 😂 for one side one guy, here it's about all day that's why
Slow speed
I feel like 2 men would be faster, and cheaper
yeh but far more unpredictible
The robot can do that 24/7. So you need 6 persons and pay them extra for working at night and on weekends.
@@cbaurtx the think probably costs 200k upwards, plus how much it costs to power the thing. So nah, I still don't see the economics of it.
@@briancherry1 6 people at say 40k/Yr would be 240k every year, plus overheads, so maybe at least 50-200% more on top of that. Maybe the robot lasts 10 years (probably more), so equivalent is then more than 2.4 million + overheads(or leave them out to compensate for robot overheads/maintenance). And the robot will be nearly perfectly consistent the whole time.
If it uses 10 kW continuous (possible, but I personally expect less), then it costs 25000/Yr in electricity (assuming 30c/unit)
@@jackaw1197 what warehouse operator throwing bags gets 40k a year??
this robot have 4 or 5 axis?
At least 5 from what i can see
Its a palletizing robot. They only have 4 axis.
This is a 5 Axis Robot. You can see it on the 5 Motors :)
@@Diranio Regardless, you only use 4 axis for palletizing.
@@robpeto3502 when you have a connected 4th axis yes, this one just uses an extra servo instead
Burdaydim
Что то он волоебит мне кажется 🤔😂
Ну а оно ему надо? :D
Factorio RTX
you are working at a 14-15 sacks per minute rate :/
Because of that robot, there is four men drunk at home doing nothing else than drunk all day long.
drunk but with a healthy back and joints
@@pronoe drunks are usually not very healthy, though too hard work is not good for health either.
Looks Weird, not efficent
What an inefficient program routine
why do you say that?
The path and cross over every item isn’t needed , by reducing the clearance hight , , given travel time as well one layer at at a time per side may also reduce loading times we are talking a second here or so but multiplied it can also on return the device goes back to x point before reaching for another at point y, that process can be reduced further lowing op time. It’s a very broad outline I strongly suggest simulating in the relevant tools first to see what I mean
Machine replacing man
I have a unit robot for sale,
Boring someone stick a V8 on that things
2 man can do 60 or more
A robot can also more than this and employees are expensive and uncomfortable to handle.
The robot can work 24/7, doesn't need days off, no paid vacation, no social payments and no risk of injury
Imagine loosing you job to this sad thing.
I mean that also looks like a very tiring and unfulfilling job
the sad part is that someone would do this back breaking job when it can be done by machine. this job is lost but others are created. someone had to design and build the robot, design and build the cell, program cell, do a safety assessment, market it, maintain it, train etc. it is a good thing that labor intensive, monotone and repetitive jobs like these are lost to machines. work smarter not harder.
4 guys can do it faster
Agreed, this thing is sad to even watch.
24 hours a day, 7 days a week, for virtually no pay?
@@johndoe1909 it's called condensed work days, 10 hours - 4 days a week, $20/hour, over time Fridays, pussy
@@xy7571 10 hours 4 days a week and then the factory shuts down? No. You have a second team that goes on when they go off. Then 2 more teams that work for the 3 days that those 2 teams are off. So looking at 16 men to work 24/7, all men that need breaks, lunch hours, overtime pay etc. The robot is so so so much cheaper in the long run. It's not even close.
@@Andrew-yl7lm 16 people without work is a lot when multiplied, to this is greed at work, literally.