Pythagoras' Theorem (3 of 3: Summary)

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 5 лют 2019
  • More resources available at www.misterwootube.com

КОМЕНТАРІ • 52

  • @captainalpha4853
    @captainalpha4853 5 років тому +47

    I wish you were my school teacher back in school.

  • @alexrobinson2825
    @alexrobinson2825 5 років тому +32

    I'm commenting during Mr Woos class right now.

  • @valerio_doublent
    @valerio_doublent 5 років тому +45

    guys, I'm from Italy, 00:11 right now, I don't know why I'm watching this but... hell yeah, this is just incredible, the passion he puts in his work it's huge, I could stay hours listening to him, great job mr Woo!

  • @staffanwadsworth
    @staffanwadsworth 3 роки тому +2

    Thanks, my 9 year old son learned a lot by watching your video!

  • @titaniumdiveknife
    @titaniumdiveknife 5 років тому +4

    Impressive grasp.
    Only someone similarly knowledgeable in their field:
    as Richard Feynman was, can teach with such passion.
    Thank you for being a pro.

  • @sanchafung4759
    @sanchafung4759 5 років тому +10

    It could also be called a 'Pythagorean Triple'

  • @IlValentino100
    @IlValentino100 5 років тому +12

    Wow, the circles do work indeed, I just tried it

    • @IlValentino100
      @IlValentino100 5 років тому +5

      -> (a/2)^2*pi+(b/2)^2*pi=(c/2)^2*pi
      -> (a/2)^2+(b/2)^2=(c/2)^2
      -> a^2/4+b^2/4=c^2/4
      -> a^2+b^2=c^2

    • @BaljitSingh-yu9sq
      @BaljitSingh-yu9sq 3 роки тому

      Me too tried, and man was I shocked that it worked!

  • @ZwiftyZwifter
    @ZwiftyZwifter Рік тому

    Great stuff. Really nice

  • @lehuyvo3812
    @lehuyvo3812 5 років тому +8

    im so enjoy the lecture lol

  • @rajumishra1267
    @rajumishra1267 5 років тому +1

    Fantastic explanations

  • @Ianna897
    @Ianna897 4 роки тому +1

    I hope i see you in australia,i‘m sooooo happy

  • @avi12
    @avi12 5 років тому +2

    Thanks for uploading in 4K! I can use my monitor properly now

  • @JohnM...
    @JohnM... 5 років тому +8

    The school system in Australia must really want good teachers, as this guy really engages his students. Here in Scotland, the system doesn't want teachers who can actually educate. Instead, they want teachers who have massive egos and peacock around displaying their vast (supposedly) mathematical knowledge to students, teachers who concentrate solely on the top students and leave the others to drown in a sea of confusion, as it's an easier job for your £35 k a year. Teachers here disgust me so much I feel like becoming a tutor. I tried to get into teacher training, but they saw that I actually GAVE A CRAP about educating students. It's kind of sad that schools put too much emphasis on the correct method and learning by wrote instead of employing your intelligence to FIGURE OUT the correct answer. I can hear Richard Feynman turning in his grave.

    • @emilcarr7190
      @emilcarr7190 5 років тому +1

      Hey, at least the SQA don't treat Maths as badly as Computing Science. Now THAT, my friend, is a big mess.

    • @masters.1000
      @masters.1000 5 років тому +1

      Here in my country they didn't even know Math... Or rather they just know more than their students.

    • @titaniumdiveknife
      @titaniumdiveknife 5 років тому +2

      Feynman's lecture on "the relationship between mathematics & physics".
      He lays it out, so poetically.

    • @Xarius01
      @Xarius01 5 років тому

      It's the same in each country lol

  • @paominlienguite2397
    @paominlienguite2397 5 років тому +1

    I'm from India and Mathematics teacher as well... like your video.

  • @liberty2641
    @liberty2641 4 роки тому

    thank you so much. was very helpful

  • @draketitanoboa7581
    @draketitanoboa7581 4 роки тому

    Mr. Woo. Pls come to Adelaide and teach us there

  • @geekmac9349
    @geekmac9349 5 років тому +1

    I‘m from germany and over here when I watched the vid it was actually the same time the clock says in this video....just at night and since I‘m already really tired and couldn’t comprehend much information this kinda freaked me out a bit at first xD

  • @bobfrank4480
    @bobfrank4480 5 років тому +3

    The good old easy days of maths...

  • @SierraKomodo
    @SierraKomodo 5 років тому +1

    I just tried it out and holy cow, half circles _do_ work.

  • @t.bundlesaurus
    @t.bundlesaurus 2 роки тому

    You are a homework Hero! (you helped me in homework)

  • @TomAijerrie
    @TomAijerrie 5 років тому +5

    Il explique tellement bien que je comprends tout, même si on ne parle pas la même langue

    • @frenchwyvern5262
      @frenchwyvern5262 5 років тому +2

      C'est vrai, je suis bilingue mais j'ai quand même de la difficulté à comprendre les termes mathématique en anglais. Cependant avec lui c'est beaucoup plus claire.

  • @bryantreacher5793
    @bryantreacher5793 3 роки тому

    What were talking about hear is some thing that I've not heard mention and yet is quite obvious is area,ok but a squared plus b squared might equal c squared but that don't prove it's a right angled triangle it is not proven

  • @snlplus6
    @snlplus6 4 роки тому +1

    I never noticed why you dissected the b square. Did I miss it? I'm terribly curious!

    • @o4_
      @o4_ 3 роки тому

      The dissection happened in the previous part.

  • @yuichiyh
    @yuichiyh 3 роки тому

    6:56 wait, it works? idk someone pls tell me if it works, I'm really curious about that
    Yep, it works, just tested it and I feel like I discovered something that I shouldn't

  • @ZwiftyZwifter
    @ZwiftyZwifter Рік тому

    Oh man. Maths for last period.

  • @rysea9855
    @rysea9855 5 років тому +1

    Vsauce? Who cares, this is much better!

  • @giuseppelucianoferrero8916
    @giuseppelucianoferrero8916 2 роки тому

    prof! Eccellente!
    Tuttavia se fossi un suo studente le domanderei se sia fondata l'ipotesi che il Teorema di Pitagora sia stato dimostrato per via algebrica e poi, e solo poi in via geometrica perché è intuitivo che il Numero (N) sia prima una cifra seguita da un'altra cifra aumentata di 1.
    Pitagora dve averlo dimostrato scrivendo ,in un primo tempo; c=(b+1); a=(b-1) ; ed (a)
    nel caso in esame Pitagora considerò di levare al quadrato le uguaglianze e scrisse :
    [(b+1)^2-(b-1)^2=b^2 ] >> poi sviluppò, sommando e sottraendo algebricamente ed ottenne b^2-4b=0 da cui si ottiene che b=4 e di conseguenza :a= 4-1=3 poi c=4+1=5 ed ecco come si generò l Atripla pitagorica.
    Naturalmente, impostando la questione rispetto ad a ed rispetto a c si ottengono le due parabole: [a^2-2a-3=0 ] ed[c^2-6c+5=0]
    Ma qui prof siamo andati oltre al teorema di Pitagora che offre una curiosità interessante rispetto al rapporto aureo 𝛗.
    Si dimostra infatti che nel triangolo retto, inscritto nella semi-circonferenza= (all'ipotenusa unitaria, ovvero 2r=5 si ottengono questi 4 valori dei segmenti del triangolo retto:
    c=5; b=4;a=3; h=2,4
    le proiezioni dei cateti a; b; sull'ipotenusa valgono 1,8 e 3,2
    l'area= 6 e il perimetro = 12
    𝛗≃ A/P±√ (c/b)>> 6/12±√(5=4) >> ≃0,5±√1,25≃ 0,5±1,118..≃ ± ( 1,618) e (-0,618)
    Saluti
    li 16/10/2021)
    Italia/(Torino)
    PS) il buon Maestro Pitagora volle portare nella tomba il suo segreto perché la comunità scientifica della sua Accademia non era ancora pronta a ricevere la scoperta.
    Si tenga presente infine la presenza del 5 nella formula che era il numero magico della scuola pitagorica.
    Oggi il Pentagono, invece, rammemora la sede della Potenza militare degli USA.

  • @hibyedotcom1291
    @hibyedotcom1291 Рік тому

    3:53
    15 black pens!!!!!
    my school mathematics teacher borrows from the students. lmao😅

  • @thinkbeforeyoupost9766
    @thinkbeforeyoupost9766 3 роки тому +1

    I'm sorry but its pronounced "PythAgorean" not PythagOrean"

    • @tanelkagan
      @tanelkagan Рік тому

      In "Py-THA-go-ras", yes, the stress is on the "THA", but in "Pythagorean" the emphasis can shift to give us "Py-tha-GOR-e-an". I've also heard it as "Py-tha-go-RE-an", although there is semi-emphasis on the "tha" in that case, a little closer to what you may have been thinking.
      It's just a quirk of English that sometimes it prefers emphasis on different syllables with connected words, because it makes the word sound more pleasing or balanced, or because it makes the word easier to say.
      For example - "Benefit". We say "BE-ne-fit", stressing the first syllable. But if we make a longer word from this such as "Beneficial" we say "Be-ne-FI-cial". We don't retain the emphasis on the "BE" at the beginning and "BE-ne-fi-cial" would sound unbalanced. Or with the word "Interpret" - we say "In-TER-pret", but if the word is extended to "Interpretation", the usual pronunciation would be "In-ter-pre-TA-tion".
      There's no hard and fast rule for this, and it's something that you simply have to learn. There is a little more leeway with words of a foreign origin, and that would include a Greek name such as Pythagoras. In any case, I hope that whatever the pronunciation, the theorem itself is well understood!

  • @RealRohanP
    @RealRohanP 3 роки тому

    Anyone else notice that the board says april second, 2019 while this was uploaded on February 6, 2019.
    Anyone else watching this in quarantine?

    • @arghyarupdatta883
      @arghyarupdatta883 3 роки тому

      That's February fourth 2019

    • @RealRohanP
      @RealRohanP 3 роки тому

      @@arghyarupdatta883 Oh i forgot thats how they write it in England

    • @arghyarupdatta883
      @arghyarupdatta883 3 роки тому

      @@RealRohanP no problem...
      But the format is different in Asia and Australia...
      U r frm England?

    • @RealRohanP
      @RealRohanP 3 роки тому

      @@arghyarupdatta883im from da US we write the month first so it would be the fourth month second day of 2019 which is april second, 2019

  • @MrLemonsChannel
    @MrLemonsChannel 5 років тому

    It's Pythagorean Triple not Triad

  • @miketimmerman6291
    @miketimmerman6291 5 років тому

    IN A RIGHT ANGELED TRIANGLE: a squared + b squared = c squared, why do teacher never stress the most important part.