@Abby from wii sports in cagayan he would be voted out just like in game changers but trish was his little stool, he bettered himself here and thats why he deserves to be a winner
He had the relationships with people within his alliance. It reminds me of Brian's social game in his Chuay Gahn alliance and nobody targeted Brian because they trusted him so much
Natalie didn't take him on in fire. Had her chance and blew it. With Michelle it wasn't a strong game in their eyes. They felt that she was just a vote and out of the vote the whole time.
@@user-gc1wj8tt2p eh, he didn't do too much. Even Spencer admitted most of them were already thinking of voting for Tony anyway. Unless you're talking about a different Spencer that I currently can't think of
@@user-gc1wj8tt2p you use the phrase "change the outcome" like the winner was already decided before the final tribal council. The whole point of the final tribal is to try to persuade the jury to your side. Jury members can change their opinions just hearing other jury members phrase their question a particular way; there's really not much difference. At the end of the day, jury members have their own opinions, and whether or not they change their opinions is COMPLETELY their choice. If it got changed by another jury member, it just means they felt that the jury member made a good point
@@user-gc1wj8tt2p why is it not fair? you got new information, you assess how that affects your opinion. That's how opinions are SUPPOSED to work. Maybe it changes your opinion, maybe it doesn't. But you're never supposed to completely ignore new information just because you already formed an opinion. And if their decision was still up in the air, you should be ignoring new information even less
@@user-gc1wj8tt2p that IS new information. Information isn't necessarily objective. Other people's opinions and their reasoning for it, however outlandish it may be, is STILL new information. Your opinions are allowed to change based on the opinions you hear from other people
@@user-gc1wj8tt2p I'm surprised you don't see your own flaw in your argument. If a jury member pursuades another to vote one way, then that's on the person who was persuaded. You're basically arguing that people should vote for who they decided before final tribal council. Jury members can still pursuade other jury members in this format; however, this format simply benefits louder, more aggressive speakers to have more power (ie. Boston Rob and Jeremy)
I remember when I first watched this final episode, I was already impressed with Tony in how he nailed this tribal council despite Nick and Jeremy toughly question him at first and I already predicted that Tony will win this season
I’m satisfied with the ending BUT Michele deserved the runner up position. If Natalie would have beat Tony I seriously would have never watched again lol
She would've deserved the win if she decided to take Tony on in the Fire-making challenge and beat him. But after deciding against doing that, she lost any chance of winning. Like Rob said.
@@Zaiqahal no she would not no way. What she did was impressive but the edge of extinction is so flawed as a whole Michele deserved it more than Natalie regardless of what Natalie did.
Natalie didn't deserve shit. Got voted out first and lucked out on the awful twist. Thank God Survivor purists had more sense than to give the win to someone who wasn't even in the real game that long.
Why the hell natalie thinks she can say anything about Tony and Jeremy's friendship? She wasn't even in the camp to know anything about it. God, I fuckin hate edge of extinction
I feel like the individual speeches were juicier in watching like seeing people vent of how salty they are is much more fun that way but this way you can’t really do that
Although I do miss the jury speeches, this town hall format is much more fitting when trying to get direct answers from the finalists. Sometimes jury speeches get a bit too personal and just add to the drama instead of getting down to brass tax.
this allows for everyone to do their speeches and everyone can pitch in when they feel something has been left out. i love it so much. the first tribal when they implemented this was like watching fireworks 🤩
@@Martial300 Michele has never been voted out and I feel like in general she is well rounded because she can play from the bottom but she can also be apart of a big alliance. She can win immunity challenges. Michele's ability to lie might be above Parvati's but she never hurts anyone's feelings.
Michele should’ve been the runner up. Edge of extinction is a joke. Natalie got voted out first!!! That docks her resume a LOT of points. And her win to get back in the game wasn’t that impressive either. She used 3 advantages in the challenge, ofc you’d win with that many advantages. Edge of extinction is a joke, only because you’re allowing the returnee DIRECT communication with the jury, the people who’ll be deciding who wins which is definitely a huge advantage in the game. Michele played from the bottom, used an advantage wisely, and avoided going home so many times. If Natalie took on tony in the fire making challenge then I would have more respect for her.
I'm not sure what Natalie did, but that is a horrible thing to say, why on earth should she question the sincerity of it? She wasn't even there, talk about desperate, don't even get me started on Jeremy, we all know who he's voting for.
He is bitter and from interviews and podcasts she's a nasty person. Attacking people on edge like yul. Stealing peanut butter, production having to get involved. Ridiculous
I still don't understand why they did not throw Tony in the last 2 challengers when he did not win an idol? Can they not see that he of the remainding players might win the 2 million dollars?
First challenge they knew he had an immunity idol so couldn't get him. Second challenge he won so couldn't get him. Third challenge he lost, and he won the firemaking. Firemaking was the only chance to get rid of him at final six and later.
Me too, congratulations to Tony I am glad he won and my bet was right, but nat endured the hardship of staying and doing everything she could to come back, she did not quit like Sandra yet she is still being criticized, she played the best she could
I am so happy Tony won. He easily played the best game this season. He’s a top tier winner for both of his wins. That’s incredible
Even though I wanted Michelle to win, I can’t deny Tony’s game
@@jacksonia7724 but she would be undeserving compared to tony why would you want her to win
FlamingRavenMC I just thought she improved a whole lot from her season
@@jacksonia7724 doesnt mean she should have won
FlamingRavenMC I have my opinion
He literally outwitted, outplayed and outlasted all of the winners.
An all round champion of the game!
I have more respect for Tony, but how did he get so far without even getting a vote
@Abby from wii sports in cagayan he would be voted out just like in game changers but trish was his little stool, he bettered himself here and thats why he deserves to be a winner
He had the relationships with people within his alliance. It reminds me of Brian's social game in his Chuay Gahn alliance and nobody targeted Brian because they trusted him so much
he also won four immunities... total legend
He had meat shields
Natalie didn't take him on in fire. Had her chance and blew it.
With Michelle it wasn't a strong game in their eyes. They felt that she was just a vote and out of the vote the whole time.
Tony the GOAT, GLADIATOR, KING, PSY DOUBLE AGENT, PUPPET MASTER Congratulations my Man.!!!🍻
Skiiiiiiiiiuuupp!!!
- Shannon Sharpe
I hope they talk and they bring back the jury speech.
@@user-gc1wj8tt2p eh, he didn't do too much. Even Spencer admitted most of them were already thinking of voting for Tony anyway. Unless you're talking about a different Spencer that I currently can't think of
@@user-gc1wj8tt2p you use the phrase "change the outcome" like the winner was already decided before the final tribal council. The whole point of the final tribal is to try to persuade the jury to your side. Jury members can change their opinions just hearing other jury members phrase their question a particular way; there's really not much difference. At the end of the day, jury members have their own opinions, and whether or not they change their opinions is COMPLETELY their choice. If it got changed by another jury member, it just means they felt that the jury member made a good point
@@user-gc1wj8tt2p why is it not fair? you got new information, you assess how that affects your opinion. That's how opinions are SUPPOSED to work. Maybe it changes your opinion, maybe it doesn't. But you're never supposed to completely ignore new information just because you already formed an opinion. And if their decision was still up in the air, you should be ignoring new information even less
@@user-gc1wj8tt2p that IS new information. Information isn't necessarily objective. Other people's opinions and their reasoning for it, however outlandish it may be, is STILL new information. Your opinions are allowed to change based on the opinions you hear from other people
@@user-gc1wj8tt2p I'm surprised you don't see your own flaw in your argument. If a jury member pursuades another to vote one way, then that's on the person who was persuaded. You're basically arguing that people should vote for who they decided before final tribal council. Jury members can still pursuade other jury members in this format; however, this format simply benefits louder, more aggressive speakers to have more power (ie. Boston Rob and Jeremy)
Sophie looked like she was ready to shrivel up and die
Yeah she was sick or something. Never seen anyone miss a tribal council, any idea if it was food poisoning or something?
She was actually sick. She didn't even get to speak because she's just making sure she can vote.
Tony's gameplay is now the blueprint for winning Survivor. He's the GOAT of survivor.
"He voted us out." - Jeremy
Bro-
I remember when I first watched this final episode, I was already impressed with Tony in how he nailed this tribal council despite Nick and Jeremy toughly question him at first and I already predicted that Tony will win this season
I’m satisfied with the ending BUT Michele deserved the runner up position. If Natalie would have beat Tony I seriously would have never watched again lol
Fr after being the first boot
She would've deserved the win if she decided to take Tony on in the Fire-making challenge and beat him. But after deciding against doing that, she lost any chance of winning. Like Rob said.
@@Zaiqahal no she would not no way. What she did was impressive but the edge of extinction is so flawed as a whole Michele deserved it more than Natalie regardless of what Natalie did.
Unfortunately, people were afraid to vote for Michele because they were scared it would make Tony not win.
For sure, hopefully this is the last time we see edge of extinction. The twist is just broken between Chris and Natalie
Tony was the most manipulative, strategic player.
Natalie didn't deserve shit. Got voted out first and lucked out on the awful twist. Thank God Survivor purists had more sense than to give the win to someone who wasn't even in the real game that long.
Natalie was more concerned with defending her god Jeremy than trying to convince the jury imo
Why the hell natalie thinks she can say anything about Tony and Jeremy's friendship? She wasn't even in the camp to know anything about it.
God, I fuckin hate edge of extinction
Natalie was real assy about tony.
@@survivorfandan_sa9 Didn’t matter in the end. Natalie was always getting Jeremy’s vote no matter what, they’re like family
I really hate the new Final Tribal. I hope they do the individual jury speech.
I agree
Same
I feel like the individual speeches were juicier in watching like seeing people vent of how salty they are is much more fun that way but this way you can’t really do that
Individual speeches are more entertaining, but the new format is fairer to let the F3 explain their games.
Yeah too many voices in the kitchen.
Natalie questioning the sincerity of Tony’s response to Jeremy is insane
Yul is so cute hahahahaha
Jeremy was so bitter this whole season. He was definitely a cooler player in Cambodia.
Michelle did great this season, from being in the out, underdog to final 3.
But Tony is a better player. Both socially and strategically .
It's so weird seeing Rob and Parvati in the jury.
Why Parvati, she's 1 of 5 people there that have already been on jury
@@ZNearX it's just weird because you can see her full game in Micronesia and HvV and it's just weird
@@tripped_and_fell_into_his_bed Her first time playing the game she was on the jury though.
@@fianle and its weird seeing her on the jury there too after watching 16-20.
@@fianle I know but its just as weird as Cook Islands
The fire token thing was such a bust. Hopefully they fix it down the road.
Although I do miss the jury speeches, this town hall format is much more fitting when trying to get direct answers from the finalists. Sometimes jury speeches get a bit too personal and just add to the drama instead of getting down to brass tax.
this allows for everyone to do their speeches and everyone can pitch in when they feel something has been left out. i love it so much. the first tribal when they implemented this was like watching fireworks 🤩
Want to see another island of the idols season but with Tony and Sarah
You mean Lacina
Sophie looks like she is suffering
She was probably still sick
She died dude
@@muhammedautobahn214 lmao
@@muhammedautobahn214 pls-
I don't know but Jeremy is so bitter! Why should he just admit it that Tony did that for his game!
Natalie is his best friend so of course he will vote for her
Jeremy isn't bitter, he just always would vote for Natalie who's like a sister on the outside, same with so many pairs on this cast.
He had nothing against Tony, he said it just so Nathalie gets vote
Jeremy wasn't bitter in a behind the scene interview he praised tony with his play is just that he wanted to help nat.
Tony and Michele cemented as the two greatest players of all time
I’d put Sarah up there too, but yeah those two are legends
Yeah I'd rank Sarah higher than Michelle
Michele? She had almost no agency in this season at all. Yea she made it to the final tribal council again but as a goat this season. She had no power
@@Martial300 Michele has never been voted out and I feel like in general she is well rounded because she can play from the bottom but she can also be apart of a big alliance. She can win immunity challenges. Michele's ability to lie might be above Parvati's but she never hurts anyone's feelings.
@@Martial300 She played from the bottom extremely well. She at the very least deserved 2nd place bc Natalie certainly didn't
Did I hear right that Natalie tanked her own chance at FTC because of her behavior on Edge?
Team Tony all the way baby I knew he’d make it to the final 3 Tony’s boss yo
Jeremy was so bitter towards Tony lol😂
He wasn’t but he just voted for Natalie because he knew her outside the game
Michele should’ve been the runner up. Edge of extinction is a joke. Natalie got voted out first!!! That docks her resume a LOT of points. And her win to get back in the game wasn’t that impressive either. She used 3 advantages in the challenge, ofc you’d win with that many advantages. Edge of extinction is a joke, only because you’re allowing the returnee DIRECT communication with the jury, the people who’ll be deciding who wins which is definitely a huge advantage in the game. Michele played from the bottom, used an advantage wisely, and avoided going home so many times. If Natalie took on tony in the fire making challenge then I would have more respect for her.
I'm not sure what Natalie did, but that is a horrible thing to say, why on earth should she question the sincerity of it? She wasn't even there, talk about desperate, don't even get me started on Jeremy, we all know who he's voting for.
He is bitter and from interviews and podcasts she's a nasty person. Attacking people on edge like yul.
Stealing peanut butter, production having to get involved. Ridiculous
If you didn’t cry when Sarah went out on her shield for Tony then you A.) Don’t love this game as much as a super fan and B.) You don’t have a heart
I actually teared up inside that I just had to let it out. The storyline between the two is complete for me the moment Tony's rope snapped.
or i hate the cops 😦
@@blakewhite6920 i pray that your bigotry goes away
well, I freely admit to A, and the jury is still out on B lol.
Amanda: I hold the record of playing108 days of survivor straight without getting voted out.
Michelle F.: Hold my torch.
Amanda still has the record tho
Oh yes, she's one of the non-winners who played better than some of the survivor winners LOL
aww poor sophie
Survivor should win an Emmy every single year for editing they take 39 days and turn it into 13-20 hours of riveting tv
Can we have their ponderosa moments?
Tyson and Sophie are painful to watch.
And Jeremy with those big ole eyeballs
@@bravoprojectrunwayfans lmao what you got against his eyeballs? 💀
Sophie wasn't feeling well
This setting really complimented Sarah’s eyes. She’s shivering and drenched and it’s still like damn her husband. he’s really blessed
I still don't understand why they did not throw Tony in the last 2 challengers when he did not win an idol? Can they not see that he of the remainding players might win the 2 million dollars?
What do you mean?
First challenge they knew he had an immunity idol so couldn't get him. Second challenge he won so couldn't get him. Third challenge he lost, and he won the firemaking. Firemaking was the only chance to get rid of him at final six and later.
Oh god. It really is weird seeing rob on the jury.
Still can't decide who was the bigger man in the conflict between Jeremy and Ben.
So proud of Michelle and Natalie
Me too, congratulations to Tony I am glad he won and my bet was right, but nat endured the hardship of staying and doing everything she could to come back, she did not quit like Sandra yet she is still being criticized, she played the best she could
This Season is The Winners At War Best Survivor
I still hate this new format of FTC. Didn't get to hear from so many people
same this finale also felt so rushed. A return challenge, 3 vote outs, final tribal, winner announced all in 3 hours with no reunion
MR Milosz you can think covid
Its understand able when there are like 16 jurors
@@survivorbest4589 eoe stinks
@@MP-ef9yo yea there was covid when they revealed the winner they did it over zoom
That thumbnail 🤣
I freaking love Yul lol
tony is a great player
Team Tony😍
For me Michelle won this season but Congrats Tony
Michele was awesome and my totes favorite here. But Tony trully deserved it more and Michele second imo.
Natalie wouldve won if she had just taken out tony instead..
She have a chance but I think Sarah would have won cause Sarah and tony was running the show.
I Glad Tony Won Survivor
Survivor :Challenges, Hunger, Survivor ☠️💣
SURVIVOR FINALE : Talkshow...
Natalie 1000%
Due to the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020
I don’t like tony but I have to give him credit
Sophie looks miserable. Wasn't she sick during this?
Natalie is completely classless
calm down, it's a game.
@@sheMan32 when two people are making fire for $2 million...you should keep ur trap shut.
@@gianlucaromano2138 No, she wants to win. Of course she should make noise.
@@sheMan32 and that's the definition of classless.
ofc bc shes a woman and shes not white
Yul
I hate this jury format so much
Where is the queen? Oh right she quit. Not surprised
She’s no queen
She didn’t need an all winners season to win a second time tho
Do you have nothing better to do than bitch about her for no reason?
When someone is 2 million dollars richer than you..
@@aniketp.8596 good one
Tony wasn't vulnerable, he never shared any with people he was just "as long as it isn't me" but that's sandra mantra so he wasn't social at all....
Natalie 🤮
I don't get why everyone loves Yul. He's so boring.