I feel like star trek is more loved here they had all the toys where none of the emperor toy were at show like the ties ion canons or the tracker beam and that outpost would have gun
Take the Shields out and Beam a couple Torpedos to the Reactor area. The Death Star gets a Phased Torpedo to the Reactor like the one that Dr Crusher helped make that can killed a Star.
I get that this is an original Federation Starship you've cooked up, and while I feel the Federation of planets would never build a singular warship THAT massive, I feel you are underestimating exactly how big and exactly how many guns a Executor Class can bring to bear. The amount of mass and armor it has as well, would make transporting warheads into it's reactor on the same relative level as trying to transport through a planet. Possible, but again, you are under Ion Cannon fire the entire time. Shields tend to not like that kind of thing. Another factor often gets overlooked is that within Star Wars, "Turbolaser" is misleading. It's closer to a Particle Cannon or Plasma round. All Sci Fi has there perks and their pits. the seemingly never-ending war between Star Wars and Star Trek is just another example of One-Upsmanship. The USS Titanic is impressive, I won't deny that, but I can see, feel and smell the bias against star wars.
Hi zerosen2141. Yes, I agree about most of the facts you comment. However I haven't demonstrate all my ship capability, and there are still more things I need to overwork on it. Also I am not sure, but I think ion cannon has blue laser effect not green (I think, or maby is cyan).
well turbo lasers are not lasers they are plasma canons ... you know the stuff rumulans shoot ... and i guess a single tie bomber can take out the enterprice ion cannons and proton torpedos
@@gehtdichnixan3200 Plasma torpedoes is a very loose category in terms of firepower in ST - depending on the type they were either very primitive "21st century" tech that could not damage a shield (as seen in SNW), or quite powerful (as seen for the Romulan episode).
@@alexslgato1735 like anything in star trek .... and still mentioning"those lasers cant penetrate our shield .... " is enough to claim that a star destroyer will not stand a chanze( and the destroyer dont even has laser ) and we all have seen what a single ion gun did when the breen fired it
@@gehtdichnixan3200 the Breen draining weapon is not an Ion Weapon, it is composed of energy and works under very different principles. And even then, Ion Weapons work very differently on SW and ST vessels, on SW ones they are instant shield and vessel disablers, while on ST they are a mild shield-draining weapon. As far as I know, the only time I've used the laser part in any comment is for the fighters, which actually use lasers or at most blasters and not actually Tibanna-powered turbolasers. Also the Star Destroyers have lasers... as Point-defence weapons alongside the turbolasers. At least the Imperial-I star destroyers did. However, while turbolasers are supposed to be powerful, there was one episode in Star Wars Rebels that either stated that the imperials use turbolaser loosely for a lot of different yield weapons, or that turbolasers were a joke (probably the former since in Rogue One one of them sliced in half a corvette), it was an episode where Admiral Thrawn was enforcing a blockade with a bunch of Imperial star destroyers and started shooting at an X-Wing and a standard TIE fighter. The TIE-Fighter received two direct hits and only took mild damage.
why not use all those heavy cannons, got one grp on each side of the saucer facing to the side, one grp faceing forward on the front of the saucer, then a pair of super heavy cannons facing forward on the secondary hall.
Each weapons are set on different level of firepower. Those Heavy Cannons you mention are only set for dealing against huge fleet of ships, advance powerful ships and instance kill on small ships(Like the Star Destroyer).
When Starfleet decides to decorate a ship for Christmas
clearly a star trek fan more than star wars.
That's right you should hide behind that moon
FOR THE EMPEROR WE SHALL CLENSE THIS GALAXY OF THE XENOS FILTH😂
I feel like star trek is more loved here they had all the toys where none of the emperor toy were at show like the ties ion canons or the tracker beam and that outpost would have gun
Take the Shields out and Beam a couple Torpedos to the Reactor area. The Death Star gets a Phased Torpedo to the Reactor like the one that Dr Crusher helped make that can killed a Star.
Umm...That is a good idea. But I have different plan for that.😉
I get that this is an original Federation Starship you've cooked up, and while I feel the Federation of planets would never build a singular warship THAT massive, I feel you are underestimating exactly how big and exactly how many guns a Executor Class can bring to bear. The amount of mass and armor it has as well, would make transporting warheads into it's reactor on the same relative level as trying to transport through a planet. Possible, but again, you are under Ion Cannon fire the entire time. Shields tend to not like that kind of thing.
Another factor often gets overlooked is that within Star Wars, "Turbolaser" is misleading. It's closer to a Particle Cannon or Plasma round.
All Sci Fi has there perks and their pits. the seemingly never-ending war between Star Wars and Star Trek is just another example of One-Upsmanship.
The USS Titanic is impressive, I won't deny that, but I can see, feel and smell the bias against star wars.
Hi zerosen2141. Yes, I agree about most of the facts you comment. However I haven't demonstrate all my ship capability, and there are still more things I need to overwork on it. Also I am not sure, but I think ion cannon has blue laser effect not green (I think, or maby is cyan).
@@kronosmk6192 Ion Cannons are generally blue, yes. regardless of IP.
I don't think that's to scale
Somebody forgot the line where Riker says in TNG, "Lasers? They won't even penetrate our navigation shields!"
well turbo lasers are not lasers they are plasma canons ... you know the stuff rumulans shoot ... and i guess a single tie bomber can take out the enterprice ion cannons and proton torpedos
@@gehtdichnixan3200 Plasma torpedoes is a very loose category in terms of firepower in ST - depending on the type they were either very primitive "21st century" tech that could not damage a shield (as seen in SNW), or quite powerful (as seen for the Romulan episode).
@@alexslgato1735 like anything in star trek .... and still mentioning"those lasers cant penetrate our shield .... " is enough to claim that a star destroyer will not stand a chanze( and the destroyer dont even has laser ) and we all have seen what a single ion gun did when the breen fired it
@@gehtdichnixan3200 the Breen draining weapon is not an Ion Weapon, it is composed of energy and works under very different principles. And even then, Ion Weapons work very differently on SW and ST vessels, on SW ones they are instant shield and vessel disablers, while on ST they are a mild shield-draining weapon.
As far as I know, the only time I've used the laser part in any comment is for the fighters, which actually use lasers or at most blasters and not actually Tibanna-powered turbolasers.
Also the Star Destroyers have lasers... as Point-defence weapons alongside the turbolasers. At least the Imperial-I star destroyers did.
However, while turbolasers are supposed to be powerful, there was one episode in Star Wars Rebels that either stated that the imperials use turbolaser loosely for a lot of different yield weapons, or that turbolasers were a joke (probably the former since in Rogue One one of them sliced in half a corvette), it was an episode where Admiral Thrawn was enforcing a blockade with a bunch of Imperial star destroyers and started shooting at an X-Wing and a standard TIE fighter. The TIE-Fighter received two direct hits and only took mild damage.
When you mess with the best you go down like the rest
why not use all those heavy cannons, got one grp on each side of the saucer facing to the side, one grp faceing forward on the front of the saucer, then a pair of super heavy cannons facing forward on the secondary hall.
Each weapons are set on different level of firepower. Those Heavy Cannons you mention are only set for dealing against huge fleet of ships, advance powerful ships and instance kill on small ships(Like the Star Destroyer).
Either the titanic is gigantic or those star destroyers have been scaled down.
All these ship have set to specific dimensions. It is the camera that has been set in front of them and in Perspective Type.
@@kronosmk6192 how big is the Titanic suppose to be?
Titanic is 9 km long
@@kronosmk6192 ‘it’s over 9000!!! (Meters)’ 😂
😂😂😂 no pasaría eso