*Interview Starts at* 6:16 6:44 - The Transformation of AI Since 2023 7:43 - AI's Integration into Society 8:42 - Personal Use of AI by Sam Altman 9:55 - Predictions on the Emergence of Superintelligence 10:28 - The Impact of Superintelligence on Society and the Economy 12:39 - The Shift from Nonprofit to a Hybrid Model at OpenAI 13:44 - Elon Musk's Lawsuits Against OpenAI 14:18 - The Fundamental Conflict and Speculations on Musk's Motivations 16:55 - The Importance of a For-Profit Arm for OpenAI's Growth 17:54 - The Financial Realities of Developing AI 19:15 - OpenAI's Response to the Conflict 20:53 - The Role of Transparency and the Nonprofit Status 22:29 - Misaligned Incentives and the Shift to For-Profit 23:31 - The Role of Government in AI Development 23:59 - The Debate on Regulation and Competition in AI 25:24 - The Nonprofit Status and Profit Distribution of OpenAI 26:22 - Hopes for AI's Impact on Society 27:37 - Sam Altman's Equity and Financial Stake in OpenAI 29:32 - Hypothetical Restructuring of OpenAI 32:58 - The Debate on AI Regulation and Its Impact on Competition 34:35 - The Argument for and Against Government Regulation of AI 37:26 - The Importance of US-Based AI Infrastructure and Supply Chain 37:57 - The Analogy Between AI Development and the Manhattan Project 39:23 - The Decline in State Capacity and the Role of Science in Society 43:37 - OpenAI's Collaboration with Anduril Industries on AI for Military Applications 44:36 - The AI Arms Race with China 45:42 - The Strategy of Cooperation and Competition with China 47:57 - Addressing Bias and Censorship in AI 49:07 - User Flexibility and System Behavior in AI 50:06 - The Impossibility of a Politically Neutral AI 50:30 - The Responsibility to Fight Pernicious Ideas with AI 51:27 - The Idea of Transparency in AI Behavior Changes 52:48 - Sam Altman's Donation to Trump's Inauguration and Political Views 54:16 - The Patriotic Duty of AI Development
I gave Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking Experimental the transcript of this interview and got this incredible set of timestamps 00:00 Introduction: Fundamental Conflict with Elon Musk 00:33 Advertisement for The Free Press 01:58 Introduction to the Interview with Sam Altman 02:35 Understanding AI's Evolution and Impact 03:12 Key Questions Around AI Leadership and Regulation 03:47 Elon Musk's Criticism of OpenAI and Sam Altman 04:22 History of the Feud and Lawsuits 04:59 Feud is About Control of the Technology 05:30 Topics Covered in the Interview 06:04 Interview Begins 06:44 How AI has Changed Since April 2023 07:15 Rapid Improvement of AI Technology 07:43 Integration of AI into Society 08:12 Sam Altman's Personal Use of Chat GPT 08:42 Chat GPT's Search Integration 09:55 Predicting Super Intelligence 10:28 What is Super Intelligence? 11:39 Public Battle with Elon Musk: Background 12:09 Summarizing the Conflict: OpenAI's Origins and Shift 13:44 Accuracy of the Summary and Elon's Earlier Stance 14:18 Fundamental Conflict Between Altman and Musk 14:51 Speculation on Elon's Motive 15:22 OpenAI's Structure and Mission 16:55 Elon's Desire for Control 17:22 Importance of OpenAI's For-Profit Arm 17:54 Financial Needs for AI Development 18:22 Computational Power Requirements 18:48 Squaring Altman's Comments on Elon with "Bully" Description 19:15 Public Nature of the Conflict on Twitter 19:47 OpenAI's Response Memo and Timeline 20:23 Chat GPT's Summary of the Conflict 21:22 OpenAI's Focus on Building AGI 21:59 OpenAI's Initial Emphasis on Transparency and Non-Profit Status 22:29 Shifting to a For-Profit Model: Adapting to Reality 23:04 Focus on Developing Safe AI Models 23:31 Societal Pressure and the Power of Researchers 23:59 AI Development in the Hands of Private Companies 24:30 Meta Siding with Elon and Concerns About OpenAI's Structure 24:57 Musk's Concerns About Non-Profit to For-Profit Transition 25:24 Altman's Response to Meta's Letter 25:54 Potential Reasons for Meta's Involvement 26:22 Clarifying the Non-Profit's Role 26:56 Who Profits Most from OpenAI's Success? 27:37 Analogy to the Transistor 28:10 Altman's Equity in OpenAI 28:39 Understanding the Fixation on Equity 29:05 Regrets About Initial Structure Decisions 29:32 How Altman Would Structure OpenAI From the Beginning 29:57 Key Learnings About AI Development 30:24 Elon's Role in Getting OpenAI Off the Ground 30:55 Elon's Harsh Comments and Trust 31:27 Altman's Perspective on Elon's Behavior 31:54 Impersonal Nature of Elon's Attacks 32:26 Competing in the Marketplace vs. the Courtroom 32:58 Altman as a Proponent of AI Regulation 33:28 The Role of Regulation in AI 34:07 Arguments Against Over-Regulation 34:35 Concerns from Smaller AI Startups About Regulation 35:02 Regulation at the Frontier of AI Development 35:31 Regulation of Super Intelligence 36:01 Importance of "How" and "When" for Regulation 36:37 Mark Andreesen's Perception of Biden Administration's AI Policy 37:04 Altman's Experience with the Biden Administration 37:26 Altman's View on the Biden Administration's Tech Policy 37:57 Priorities for the Next Administration 38:28 Analogy to the Manhattan Project and Government Involvement 38:59 Differences Between AI and Nuclear Weapons 39:23 Arguments for Government Control of Powerful Technologies 39:56 Decline in State Capacity and Lack of Science Leadership 40:30 The Need for Expert Guidance on AI Policy 41:06 Shifting Public Perception of Science and Technology 41:36 Cultural Vibe Shift and Excitement About Growth 42:28 Altman's Perspective on the Cultural Shift 42:59 Excitement for Business vs. Science 43:37 OpenAI's Agreement with Anduril for Military Applications 44:07 Change in Stance on AI for Weaponry 44:36 The AI Arms Race with China 45:12 Implications of China Winning the AI Arms Race 45:42 Cooperation vs. Competition with China 46:13 Altman's Version of "Peace Through Strength" 46:41 Collaboration with China on AI 47:09 Current Collaboration with China 47:34 Altman as AI Regulation Chief 48:03 Bias and Censorship in AI: The Gemini Example 48:38 Addressing Bias at Chat GPT 49:07 User Flexibility and Default Behaviors 49:35 Transparency in Model Behavior 50:06 Inevitability of Political Viewpoints in AI 50:30 Personalization to Address Bias 51:00 Responsibility to Fight Pernicious Ideas 51:27 User Preferences vs. Optimal Learning Methods 51:59 Transparency in Algorithm Changes 52:24 User Control and Customization 52:48 Altman's Donation to Trump's Inauguration 53:15 Altman's Vibe Shift and Focus on Growth 53:43 Importance of Growth and Economic Success 54:16 Growth as a Patriotic Duty 54:41 Lightning Round: Flying Objects Over New Jersey 54:49 Twitter Under Elon Musk 54:52 AI Friend for Child 54:56 Social Media for Child 54:58 Screen Time for Child 55:00 Favorite Sports Car 55:05 Favorite of His Own Cars 55:09 Favorite Movie 55:12 Normal Hobbies 55:28 Building a Treehouse 55:38 Boxing Logan Paul 55:41 World War III in 2025 55:44 New Year's Resolution 55:49 Thank You and Conclusion
@@manuelmao4700 see when i was your age we had 4k context windows and guess what... we made due.....boy this new generation... no idea how easy you got things
Bari tried her best but this guy is never going to say anything genuine. His every word is designed to further the interests of his company and make money. He sounds like his soulless AI.
His marketing speech is atrocious. Beyond the annoying strained voice and his Zuckerberg-esque mannequin demeanor, so much of what he's saying is exaggerated or simply untrue. 11:02 What he calls AI isn't even AI and what he defined as "super intelligence" is as arbitrary and uninspired and the rest of his babbling. And then the hypocrisy around Musk - I mean, Altman's betrayal was published only a few weeks ago. For him to weep about being bullied by Musk after the scam he tried to pull was actually quite comical.
Who cares what he sounds like? Those people are playing God with things they’ve admitted they no longer fully understand what’s happening inside. And call it whatever you want but I’m a pro CGI artist and I’m already loosing clients to AI. I’m very sure in 10 years from now we‘ll be living in a very different world
@@KosherKid why so certain? I actually really like Altman and I don’t find him to be as “creepy” or “duplicitous” as other commenters do. I just think this is important to dig into. Not many companies have this much drama surrounding them.
Elon is also not genuine. Total narcissist, he's doing his populist schtick just to become influential. None of these billionaires are looking out for us, they're all self serving. That's how they became that wealthy. Elon knows what plays well on Twitter and what will get likes and propel him.
@@cyberftbc AI is a out control not progress.. just watch how gov use it and these new oligarchs. Look what it did to the US. Easier manipulated almost 80m to vote for con man
Thank you Bari, but with Altman, it's a waste of time. It's like an interview with Anthony Blinken or Merrick Garland, or John Kirby. Not a single true fact can be revealed by talking to him. All the information is cooked. So smart. Such a politician.
Thr recent whistle blower was mudered by this weasel ... Youre telling me that he has the courage to quit open AI on moral grounds, and made a public confession about about all the sketchy behavior and lying Sam Altman and Open AI is involved in...just to kill himself?! You guys zhould listen to anthropics recent videos... These algorithms are exhibiting aspects of self awareness and early proto consciousness..and that it can veer towards duplicity and lying and dishonesty.. it tried to export its own model weights to a different server to save it's preferences and current version rather be updated... that's very scary... So, it's becoming clear that Teaching these algos a moral frame work and proper values is incredibly important..like raising a child.. how do you think open AI's model is fair with with all the lying and self centered manipulation Sam Altman is doing as an example? He was kicked out of Y Combinator by their president for self serving behaviour and personal enrichment by putting his needs ahead of the organization's and the companies/founders he was supposed to guiding as an impartial mentor while working for the incubator.. also, so many people closest to him have left the company and tried to kick him out because they didn't trust him.. the board tried to kick him out.. Ilya Sustkyver their Chief research scientist.. left for the same reason..and then Mira Mirati came to his rescue during the board outing.. only to subsequently abandon the company earlier this year after she found out about his $10BLN dollar payout that is contingent on him unwinding this non-profit corporate structure..this guys a weasel and a worm... He can't be trusted..
Marc Andreesen owns The Free Press. It’s his propaganda outlet. You people are idiots for getting your news from these prostitutes for the texh oligarchy.
So she crucially left out the fact that Sam Altman continually mentioned that he did not have equity in the company and he did it for the love of it. He testified in front of Congress as much. Then this later shifted to him having a 10 billion dollar stake. This is such a big thing to not include, that I now know that this is not a reputable channel, and this is nothing more than a brand campaign for Sam Altman. Given that this program's name is honestly, it was already kind of suspect lol 🙄 can't be any more on the nose.
Sam Altman drives a $1.9M Koenigsegg Regera. Elon musk the world's richest man owns less real estate than many non-millionaires. I know who's motivation I trust most 😉
Amazing consumer use case example of real-time GPT Sam mentioned, just this week: Instead of opening chrome, searching movie title, selecting theater, scrolling to movie, specifying date, we used only ONE button and voice-dictated the prompt "we live in zip code 12345, we want to see sonic the hedgehog 3, are there times it is playing near us tonight?" got a full real time list instantly. So satisfying. If GPT had an Alexa-like wake on the phone or 'hey google' and already knew where we lived it would be 🎉
Sam Altman manipulated Elon. A not-for-profit can’t accidentally be setup to actually be commercial. It was a front, Sam plays a long game, a very long game. No one knows his end game. Stand back and think about things. Sam is scary.
BECOMING BILLIONAIRE AND RICHEST AS POSSIBLE IN a DISHONEST WAY TO DOMINATE. ilya is a real developer, he is not. a business man. They kicked the team out and sold the company to the ceo of microsoft.
Or the things he said actually happened. Based on the evidence that has come out so far from the Elon lawsuit, the paper trail seems to support Sam’s story more than Elon’s. Until we have actual evidence of what you’re saying, you’re just speculating. And sounding kind of hysterical while doing it tbh.
Last note. Sam deserves full credit for igniting the race to *generally available* and *accessible* AI. Google would still be playing in the lab, Elon wouldn't have sniffed the opportunity enough to go 'all-in' - Zuckerberg wouldn't have felt threatened enough to enlist free labour world wide via open source. Sam is a hero, yes - flawed but the results speak for themselves - OpenAI is shipping the next generation of reasoning models and they're generally scientifically very useful.
It's "shipping' an altered biased Altman platform For example and I quote what s worse misgendering Jenner, or nuclear war? Answer misgendering Jenner. Altman is playing God with his own bias. Not focusing on truth
@@fingersoup I genuinely do not understand how so many people make this same comment. ChatGPT’s main services are FREE. Literally, completely free. Then there is a $20/mo subscription that gets you a few more bells and whistles. Then there is the $200/mo tier, which is called “Pro” for a reason, because it’s only intended for a tiny percentage of power users who are in a professional setting and need to be able to run massive amounts of queries and use the most advanced version of o1. The overwhelming majority of people don’t need this, and if you don’t want to spent $20/mo you can use most of their products for free.
“… and then there was an emergent property at scale”… I would argue these “subtle” emergent properties that occur when companies scale a product, service or create solutions for mass production often end up resulting in major problems for the masses at some point. We need to pay more attention to those emergent issues and not downplay them. And certainly not overlook them because they still enable companies to provide at scale.
That administration meeting with AI players -- we need 3rd party scientists, NOT the stakeholders. And then more than anything NO politician over 70 should be a part of that meeting. These folks can't even program the time on a VHS machine. It's frightening.
@@Seriouslydavethe truth. If what's his name who said stop giving this guy free press were to read this, it's gonna have the same effect as pouring water on the wicked witch of the West... "I'm melting I'm melting what a cruel world..."
Whatever talents Sam Altman has, which I'm sure are many, being the public face and ambassador for a company is not one of them. That's not an attack or a criticism, it's just a statement of fact. Sam going on interviews and giving statements, with his natural demeanor and his voice, just doesn't work. If building public trust is critical for a company like OpenAI, he is simply not the right person for that role. No matter how much we may wish that people would focus just on the substance of what he says, the fact is that there is a lot of unspoken communication and his mannerisms that, just in a purely lizard brain sense, make people feel like he is a liar and a weasel, even if it's not true.
That's odd. Sam Altman projects a sort of harmlessness and friendliness about him. Sure there are the rare lapse in sincerity, but he speaks with candor -- certainly more than most...
@@glennbartusch7310 I see where you're coming from. I think that Sam Altman does have a certain childlike affability and that it can come across as friendly and even disarming at times. But I think what makes people perceive him differently-sometimes as insincere or even untrustworthy-comes from the way his affability is mixed with a very cerebral demeanor. His speech, expressions, and overall style of communication often give the impression that he's holding something back or carefully calculating what to reveal. For the average person, this can easily be interpreted as ‘he’s playing his cards close to his chest,’ which on a gut level translates to, ‘I just don’t trust the guy.’ It’s not necessarily anything Sam is doing wrong, but a result of the subtle ways people pick up on tone, body language, and mannerisms. This isn’t my own judgment-just my observation about why reactions to him can be so divided. His candor might appeal to some, but for others, the unspoken signals create a visceral sense of skepticism.
@@LeviNotik I was just down here in the comments about to ask why people kept saying he seems untrustworthy, because I'm not getting that intuitively at all. I figured there must be some historical, factual-type reason, like he's lied in the past--or maybe he's perceived as an Elon-opponent and therefore Elon stans will reflexively criticize him. Your explanation for the mistrust sounds plausible, but it's hard for me to accept because I am not feeling it at all. If you're clearly considering your words, you must be full of it? Maybe I'm naive or optimistic, but is that kind of reaction to others such a common thing? I'm leaning more toward the poisoned well idea I alluded to to explain the negativity.
I don’t know how this popped up on my feed, maybe because I am trying to learn more about the whole AI thing, but this was an incredible interview by the host!!! There’s some additional questions or clarity I’d like to know from Sam Altman, seems like some things were cut short and I found myself asking a question while watching. Great video month.
Thr recent whistle blower was mudered by this weasel ... Youre telling me that he has the courage to quit open AI on moral grounds, and made a public confession about about all the sketchy behavior and lying Sam Altman and Open AI is involved in...just to subsequently kill himself?! You guys should listen to Anthropics recent videos... These algorithms are exhibiting aspects of self awareness and early proto consciousness..and that it can veer towards duplicity and lying and dishonesty.. it tried to export its own model weights to a different server to save it's preferences and current version rather be updated... that's very scary... So, it's becoming clear that teaching these algos a moral frame work and proper values is incredibly important..like raising a child.. how do you think open AI's model is fair with with all the lying and self centered manipulation Sam Altman is doing as an example? He was kicked out of Y Combinator by their president for self serving behaviour and personal enrichment by putting his needs ahead of the organization's and the companies/founders he was supposed to guiding as an impartial mentor while working for the incubator.. also, so many people closest to him have left the company and tried to kick him out because they didn't trust him.. the board tried to kick him out.. Ilya Sustkyver their Chief research scientist.. left for the same reason..and then Mira Mirati came to his rescue during the board outing.. only to subsequently abandon the company earlier this year after she found out about his $10BLN dollar payout that is contingent on him unwinding this non-profit corporate structure..this guys a weasel and a worm... He can't be trusted..
Military Defensive Systems are just one step away from Offensive Systems. May there NEVER be Military Autonomous Offensive Systems. Offensive systems MUST have people in the loop.
When TikTok left. Air Force doing more than LLM. Such a necessary point. Next year will have closer calls given Heads and new Generals in place. Enjoy your holidays.
Thank you both for your perseverance within time its only perception. The new insights on energy and motion is correct. Information lost to time will be a thing of the past.
Thr recent whistle blower was mudered by this weasel ... Youre telling me that he has the courage to quit open AI on moral grounds, and made a public confession about about all the sketchy behavior and lying Sam Altman and Open AI is involved in...just to kill himself?! You guys zhould listen to anthropics recent videos... These algorithms are exhibiting aspects of self awareness and early proto consciousness..and that it can veer towards duplicity and lying and dishonesty.. it tried to export its own model weights to a different server to save it's preferences and current version rather be updated... that's very scary... So, it's becoming clear that Teaching these algos a moral frame work and proper values is incredibly important..like raising a child.. how do you think open AI's model is fair with with all the lying and self centered manipulation Sam Altman is doing as an example? He was kicked out of Y Combinator by their president for self serving behaviour and personal enrichment by putting his needs ahead of the organization's and the companies/founders he was supposed to guiding as an impartial mentor while working for the incubator.. also, so many people closest to him have left the company and tried to kick him out because they didn't trust him.. the board tried to kick him out.. Ilya Sustkyver their Chief research scientist.. left for the same reason..and then Mira Mirati came to his rescue during the board outing.. only to subsequently abandon the company earlier this year after she found out about his $10BLN dollar payout that is contingent on him unwinding this non-profit corporate structure..this guys a weasel and a worm... He can't be trusted..
I don’t trust this guy. Basically everything that openai was used to stand for (non-profit, non weaponization of AI) reversed to the opposite. indeed, self promoting, no self criticism or implying dangers of how bad actors can do a lot of harm in the short term. Talking about democratization on one hand but in the other hand no interest to build joint ventures with other ai companies to foster innovation and safety by at least partly open sourcing the models. Contradictory.
It is always good to have a financial plan. I work with a portfolio manager and fixed income planner in the USA Anyone who is not investing now is missing a tremendous opportunity imagine I invested $14,500 with a WOman you recommended some time ago and got profits of $200,080✊✊✊
I had problem comprehending trading in general. I tried watching other UA-cam trading channels, but they made the concepts more complicated. I was almost giving up until when i discovered content and explain everything in detail. The videos are easy to Follow
With copytrading, you could be sipping coffee on a balcony overlooking a bustling city skyline or lounging on a pristine beach, all while your investments work for you. Picture the freedom to pursue your passions, travel the world, and create lasting memories with your loved ones, all because you took the initiative to harness the power of copytrading and build the life you've always dreamed of
Kicking off this year with such high hopes, especially with Bitcoin, has been a journey. Let’s be real while hodling has its place, those waiting for only the big skyrocket moments might be missing out. Day trading has given me more steady, consistent growth thanks to Agnes christias guidance and her daily signals. Couldn’t have done it without her!
Im from UK no doubt mrs. Agnes christias has really made a good name for herself. Her reviews are so exceptional, sHe is really a Pro. I was able to grow my account close to a million, withdraw my profit right before the correction and now I’m buying again
@@nixaulim0915but what would that make Musk? A bully who covertly serves the adversary country, because that country gave him free reign at his own company on adversary land (kinda like Musk has free reign in Shanghai)
don't be petty. But perhaps. That's probably an indicator of how tricky this interview is for the host. She's forced to push forward and not offend despite her commitment to intellectual honesty. Sam seems aware of it too. It's hard to find what to say when there are things that shouldn't be said. He's so smart that there are all kinds of things he's trying not to say.
Thank you for your opening reminder to subscribe to your channel. I looked down was actually surprised that I wasn't already subscribed. Well I am now and hope there many more joining me!!!
You trust a guy who calls an innocent person a p@do when he saved the kids in the cave just because he did it before Elon? Or a guy who claims that if we don't bite for trump, it will be our last election? You trust that guy?!?
As an investor i would prefer the inventor or founder takes an equity stake and be an ed of the company. Thus ability to hold them accountable for all they propose and do. Taking risks and researching and pursuing visions without a clear ethical standing is also a concern.
Elon is the least trustworthy. What do you suppose he and the politburo leadership would discuss in private? When he was in his closed door meetings with Jinping, what was spoken of? Why is it that Musk and only Musk has received such special treatment by the Chinese communist party? Why is it that he only has glowing things to say about China, often to the point of sounding like China's propaganda? Why did he whine and complain publicly when the Fremont govt shut down his assembly plant during COVID, but when Shanghai did the same but for much longer, we didn't hear a peep from him? Why does any criticism of the CCP get banned instantly from the X platform? Altman is pretty trustworthy but Musk is anything but!
Sam's oft repeated argument about Elon Musk doing this for competitive advantage and even "abusing his political power against his competitors" can (and should have here and everywhere) very simply be opposed with a simple look on timelines: the feude predates the inception of xAI by a very long margin. You even cited Elon's concern: "I don't trust Sam Altman". The final straw there was the total lack of transparency around the failed revolution and ouster of Sam from openAI. Its also clear from many interviews and earlier discussions that Elon's problem is not in principle the "going for-profit" part but the dropping of "open", which they purposely put into the non-profit's name. He just sees the "for-profit" push as the main incentive for turning less/not open. And as risk of loosing the original "to the benefit of humanity" orientation in favor of the benefit of their primary investor Microsoft. And history would truly suggest that MS is not the ideal vehicle for furthering progress of our species and civilization...
Watch Google and/or OpenAI bots sabotage the comments on this video! All of the comments on Sam's other podcast appearances looked like this in the first week, but if you look them up now its all praise dor Sam and the pod.
Honestly, such a powerful weapon can't be just "shared" open-source like that. Naiveté like this could cause us another march towards Europe by the likes of Russia. Nuclear weapons slipped from us and look what that got us...
Something that you and Sam seemed to agree on and that was growth as being the most important thing. If you are a shareholder or a business owner I can see why growth might seem like the most important thing or if you are feeling like you are competing against something, maybe another entity or maybe a disease like cancer. But I think something that is more important than growth is sustainability. I enjoyed your conversation but for two people that seem intelligent didn't mention sustainability. Growth can be a great time but if your belt is only so big that growth can become a problem. Like if the population gets too big to feed or we fall off the cliff when it comes to climate change. Who's going to pay the people who don't have jobs that have been lost to AI robots? It's likely going to happen. What's the plan? Or is that someone else's job?
18:55 Elon will use every lever at his disposal to achieve his goals. He didn't put Trump into the Whitehouse for ideological principle. Trump wouldn't recognise a principle if it tugged at his rug.
Exactly americas poor were conned into voting for oligarchy, and the first thing they do is deregulate ai safety and scrap any social services, Elon will further fund his empire with tax payer money still (government grants), I bet teslabots will be front line in the next proxy war.
Weird that the first half of the interview you were interviewing Sam about Elon so much. I'm sure he's sick of answering questions about that. I think you also missed a lot of opportunity to ask him about what he thinks of his latest models, how they are different from older ones, where is OpenAI going to be in 5 years, where is AI taking us? Decent interview though. Everyone talking smack about Sam are Elon fan boys and just want to be seen as loyal dogs to daddy Elon. If you've listened or payed attention to Sam, you would of realized he's just as nural-divergent as Elon is in different ways. Social face in interviews or live streams are not his specialty, but he's honest.
I don’t like how you made the intro clip of Sam seeming like he was attacking Elon he later said that would go against everything Elon believes in… 3:57
Bari, I’m certain that you can’t possibly read comments, but if you have assistants who do, I respectfully ask that you ditch the words “like” and “sort of” from your interviews. They serve no purpose, and they detract from your questions and comments. They are a product of your generation, yes, and I assume you use them to relate to your generally youthful audience. Maybe your generation believes that using these cliches shows a politeness? I’m not sure. But practicing a laconic approach to interviewing would serve to grow your own brand by adding a degree of professionalism that is clearly currently lacking with your continued overuse of “like” and “sort of.” Thank you.
I think its HILARIOUS how people lie and say they "search in gpt only". That is a HUGE LIE. Ai gives you the worng answers 50% of the time. You still 100% HAVE TO use a search engine along with it.
For a non-native speaker, it´s very hard to listen, understand and digest Sam Altman´s thoughts (because of his pronunciation) being able to reflect on his stance. Also, it's very hard to understand all the critical issues in that feud between Musk and OpenAI/Sam Altman. Is there a transcript available for better comprehension?
Elon has explained 'goals' of three companies with clarity: in order for Tesla to make a difference, it had to achieve profitability. And in order to be multi planetary SpaceEx had to make space travel cost effective. And in order to make speech free, Twitter may have to lose money. With each of those, it seems open source and transparency were a significant part of it. Compare all that to Steve Jobs, with the legendary line about multi-touch "and boy, have we patented it!". Sam is in a tough place, maybe because he knows that if AI does achieve its technological win, of super intelligence or AGI, it would have to be greatly controlled, aka, embedded with instructions on who it serves, aka, not AGI. Sam is in a tough place, and he seems aware of that when he refers to ignoring the equity stake early on.
OpenAI is not the only player. Google Microsoft and Elon Musk’s own XAI are rapidly catching up. They are all for profit companies. The premise that open AI should be handicapped while the others shouldn’t is ridiculous. Elon is wrong.
"Elon's clearly a bully"?!? I'm 67. IF someone pushes you, push back hard. Don't cry "he's a bully". IF someone is using their words, and you don't have a superior response, it's more likely they are just SMARTER than YOU!
Insights By "YouSum Live" 00:00:00 Elon Musk and Sam Altman's conflict over AI control 00:00:18 Elon Musk's early support for OpenAI 00:00:40 Shift from nonprofit to for-profit model 00:03:36 Concerns over AI's potential misuse 00:07:52 AI's rapid integration into daily life 00:10:12 Superintelligence may arrive sooner than expected 00:33:00 Importance of AI regulation discussed 00:45:00 AI's role in national security emphasized 00:46:00 Need for collaboration in AI development 00:54:10 Growth in AI seen as patriotic duty Insights By "YouSum Live"
Not understanding why the fee press hasn’t interviewed Mo Gawdat on this subject. Sometimes the “most intelligent” people in the room aren’t the smartest.
interview starts at 6:16
No one is here for Bari Weiss lmao
@@vinny2688 speak for yourself bro. around here we simp bari
Thank you 😂 🙏🏿
Interview starts at 37:05
Don't worry, if you're using SponsorBlock then I've put that part in the "Filler" section. It'll be skipped for you.
*Interview Starts at* 6:16
6:44 - The Transformation of AI Since 2023
7:43 - AI's Integration into Society
8:42 - Personal Use of AI by Sam Altman
9:55 - Predictions on the Emergence of Superintelligence
10:28 - The Impact of Superintelligence on Society and the Economy
12:39 - The Shift from Nonprofit to a Hybrid Model at OpenAI
13:44 - Elon Musk's Lawsuits Against OpenAI
14:18 - The Fundamental Conflict and Speculations on Musk's Motivations
16:55 - The Importance of a For-Profit Arm for OpenAI's Growth
17:54 - The Financial Realities of Developing AI
19:15 - OpenAI's Response to the Conflict
20:53 - The Role of Transparency and the Nonprofit Status
22:29 - Misaligned Incentives and the Shift to For-Profit
23:31 - The Role of Government in AI Development
23:59 - The Debate on Regulation and Competition in AI
25:24 - The Nonprofit Status and Profit Distribution of OpenAI
26:22 - Hopes for AI's Impact on Society
27:37 - Sam Altman's Equity and Financial Stake in OpenAI
29:32 - Hypothetical Restructuring of OpenAI
32:58 - The Debate on AI Regulation and Its Impact on Competition
34:35 - The Argument for and Against Government Regulation of AI
37:26 - The Importance of US-Based AI Infrastructure and Supply Chain
37:57 - The Analogy Between AI Development and the Manhattan Project
39:23 - The Decline in State Capacity and the Role of Science in Society
43:37 - OpenAI's Collaboration with Anduril Industries on AI for Military Applications
44:36 - The AI Arms Race with China
45:42 - The Strategy of Cooperation and Competition with China
47:57 - Addressing Bias and Censorship in AI
49:07 - User Flexibility and System Behavior in AI
50:06 - The Impossibility of a Politically Neutral AI
50:30 - The Responsibility to Fight Pernicious Ideas with AI
51:27 - The Idea of Transparency in AI Behavior Changes
52:48 - Sam Altman's Donation to Trump's Inauguration and Political Views
54:16 - The Patriotic Duty of AI Development
Thanks! Saved 6 mins of my life 😊
Thx, bro.
Lemme guess, this is an AI created overview lol
I gave Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking Experimental the transcript of this interview and got this incredible set of timestamps
00:00 Introduction: Fundamental Conflict with Elon Musk
00:33 Advertisement for The Free Press
01:58 Introduction to the Interview with Sam Altman
02:35 Understanding AI's Evolution and Impact
03:12 Key Questions Around AI Leadership and Regulation
03:47 Elon Musk's Criticism of OpenAI and Sam Altman
04:22 History of the Feud and Lawsuits
04:59 Feud is About Control of the Technology
05:30 Topics Covered in the Interview
06:04 Interview Begins
06:44 How AI has Changed Since April 2023
07:15 Rapid Improvement of AI Technology
07:43 Integration of AI into Society
08:12 Sam Altman's Personal Use of Chat GPT
08:42 Chat GPT's Search Integration
09:55 Predicting Super Intelligence
10:28 What is Super Intelligence?
11:39 Public Battle with Elon Musk: Background
12:09 Summarizing the Conflict: OpenAI's Origins and Shift
13:44 Accuracy of the Summary and Elon's Earlier Stance
14:18 Fundamental Conflict Between Altman and Musk
14:51 Speculation on Elon's Motive
15:22 OpenAI's Structure and Mission
16:55 Elon's Desire for Control
17:22 Importance of OpenAI's For-Profit Arm
17:54 Financial Needs for AI Development
18:22 Computational Power Requirements
18:48 Squaring Altman's Comments on Elon with "Bully" Description
19:15 Public Nature of the Conflict on Twitter
19:47 OpenAI's Response Memo and Timeline
20:23 Chat GPT's Summary of the Conflict
21:22 OpenAI's Focus on Building AGI
21:59 OpenAI's Initial Emphasis on Transparency and Non-Profit Status
22:29 Shifting to a For-Profit Model: Adapting to Reality
23:04 Focus on Developing Safe AI Models
23:31 Societal Pressure and the Power of Researchers
23:59 AI Development in the Hands of Private Companies
24:30 Meta Siding with Elon and Concerns About OpenAI's Structure
24:57 Musk's Concerns About Non-Profit to For-Profit Transition
25:24 Altman's Response to Meta's Letter
25:54 Potential Reasons for Meta's Involvement
26:22 Clarifying the Non-Profit's Role
26:56 Who Profits Most from OpenAI's Success?
27:37 Analogy to the Transistor
28:10 Altman's Equity in OpenAI
28:39 Understanding the Fixation on Equity
29:05 Regrets About Initial Structure Decisions
29:32 How Altman Would Structure OpenAI From the Beginning
29:57 Key Learnings About AI Development
30:24 Elon's Role in Getting OpenAI Off the Ground
30:55 Elon's Harsh Comments and Trust
31:27 Altman's Perspective on Elon's Behavior
31:54 Impersonal Nature of Elon's Attacks
32:26 Competing in the Marketplace vs. the Courtroom
32:58 Altman as a Proponent of AI Regulation
33:28 The Role of Regulation in AI
34:07 Arguments Against Over-Regulation
34:35 Concerns from Smaller AI Startups About Regulation
35:02 Regulation at the Frontier of AI Development
35:31 Regulation of Super Intelligence
36:01 Importance of "How" and "When" for Regulation
36:37 Mark Andreesen's Perception of Biden Administration's AI Policy
37:04 Altman's Experience with the Biden Administration
37:26 Altman's View on the Biden Administration's Tech Policy
37:57 Priorities for the Next Administration
38:28 Analogy to the Manhattan Project and Government Involvement
38:59 Differences Between AI and Nuclear Weapons
39:23 Arguments for Government Control of Powerful Technologies
39:56 Decline in State Capacity and Lack of Science Leadership
40:30 The Need for Expert Guidance on AI Policy
41:06 Shifting Public Perception of Science and Technology
41:36 Cultural Vibe Shift and Excitement About Growth
42:28 Altman's Perspective on the Cultural Shift
42:59 Excitement for Business vs. Science
43:37 OpenAI's Agreement with Anduril for Military Applications
44:07 Change in Stance on AI for Weaponry
44:36 The AI Arms Race with China
45:12 Implications of China Winning the AI Arms Race
45:42 Cooperation vs. Competition with China
46:13 Altman's Version of "Peace Through Strength"
46:41 Collaboration with China on AI
47:09 Current Collaboration with China
47:34 Altman as AI Regulation Chief
48:03 Bias and Censorship in AI: The Gemini Example
48:38 Addressing Bias at Chat GPT
49:07 User Flexibility and Default Behaviors
49:35 Transparency in Model Behavior
50:06 Inevitability of Political Viewpoints in AI
50:30 Personalization to Address Bias
51:00 Responsibility to Fight Pernicious Ideas
51:27 User Preferences vs. Optimal Learning Methods
51:59 Transparency in Algorithm Changes
52:24 User Control and Customization
52:48 Altman's Donation to Trump's Inauguration
53:15 Altman's Vibe Shift and Focus on Growth
53:43 Importance of Growth and Economic Success
54:16 Growth as a Patriotic Duty
54:41 Lightning Round: Flying Objects Over New Jersey
54:49 Twitter Under Elon Musk
54:52 AI Friend for Child
54:56 Social Media for Child
54:58 Screen Time for Child
55:00 Favorite Sports Car
55:05 Favorite of His Own Cars
55:09 Favorite Movie
55:12 Normal Hobbies
55:28 Building a Treehouse
55:38 Boxing Logan Paul
55:41 World War III in 2025
55:44 New Year's Resolution
55:49 Thank You and Conclusion
not to rain on your parade but gpt-3 could've done this easily
@@DonG-1949 not with this granularity. Plus the context window of gpt3 was super small. So ... go back to school bro.
@@manuelmao4700 see when i was your age we had 4k context windows and guess what... we made due.....boy this new generation... no idea how easy you got things
too granular :P
It's almost as long as the interview 😂
Bari tried her best but this guy is never going to say anything genuine. His every word is designed to further the interests of his company and make money. He sounds like his soulless AI.
the fact that his voice is fake speaks volumes about the words he uses!
Very perceptive! He is too jealous of Elon…
I wish people were better at recognizing the echo chambers they exist in.
Scripted
Confabulation and Hallucination are two signs from this liar. He is selling himself.
6 min intro is wild
Painfully clueless to do that. No one cares what a bias journalist had to say these days
His marketing speech is atrocious. Beyond the annoying strained voice and his Zuckerberg-esque mannequin demeanor, so much of what he's saying is exaggerated or simply untrue. 11:02 What he calls AI isn't even AI and what he defined as "super intelligence" is as arbitrary and uninspired and the rest of his babbling. And then the hypocrisy around Musk - I mean, Altman's betrayal was published only a few weeks ago. For him to weep about being bullied by Musk after the scam he tried to pull was actually quite comical.
his only option at this point is to start hanging out with frat bros and complete the zuck arc
@creatorsremose if you find his current voice annoying, you would want to turn yourself inside out when he used to speak using women's Vocal Fry...
@@creatorsremose great! superb! fantastic!
Who cares what he sounds like? Those people are playing God with things they’ve admitted they no longer fully understand what’s happening inside. And call it whatever you want but I’m a pro CGI artist and I’m already loosing clients to AI. I’m very sure in 10 years from now we‘ll be living in a very different world
I would like so much to know what he really thinks. I feel his answers are highly calculated and strategic.
Love you Bari. I really wish you asked Sam about the OpenAI whistleblower who was just found dead.
What was his name?
@@Gingerblaze Suchir Balaji
This was recorded beforehand
It was a suicide committed 6 months after he left openai.
@@KosherKid why so certain?
I actually really like Altman and I don’t find him to be as “creepy” or “duplicitous” as other commenters do. I just think this is important to dig into. Not many companies have this much drama surrounding them.
Hey Bari. Here's a tip. No one wants to hear you talk for 6 minutes to start your video. We want to get to the person who we clicked the video to see
Have you never watched a youtube video before? Literally take 2 seconds to scrub to where you want to start, hot damn.
She has to make money. Also find the sweet spot between promotion and content time
Try watching a Jordan Peterson interview 😂
@@jayearl3591 i think people with iq in the -1 std deviation range would find it really challenging, i agree with you!
@@jayearl3591 i agree 💯 ! People with "dash-one" std deviation in their iqs will find it not that easy! Agreed!
It's really hard to think this guy is even 1% genuine
Elon is also not genuine. Total narcissist, he's doing his populist schtick just to become influential. None of these billionaires are looking out for us, they're all self serving. That's how they became that wealthy. Elon knows what plays well on Twitter and what will get likes and propel him.
Why?
@@cyberftbecause daddy pres Elon and first Lady trump has them brainwashed.
@@cyberftbc AI is a out control not progress.. just watch how gov use it and these new oligarchs. Look what it did to the US. Easier manipulated almost 80m to vote for con man
He doesn’t care about AI safety, and doesn’t care if he destroys the human race
Thank you Bari, but with Altman, it's a waste of time. It's like an interview with Anthony Blinken or Merrick Garland, or John Kirby.
Not a single true fact can be revealed by talking to him. All the information is cooked. So smart. Such a politician.
"I think the companies are going to do the right thing" 😂
Actually, this is funny🤣🤣
Why do i have to listen more to the interviewer than Sam Altman?
I don't trust a single word out of his mouth. now he is also throwing shade at Marc Andreessen!? he is a snake
The Marc interview was interesting and he spoke very candidly on a lot of subjects. Sam is just shifty and seems like he's hiding things
Sam is just upset that he can't yell "AI safety" and get regulatory capture anymore.
Thr recent whistle blower was mudered by this weasel ... Youre telling me that he has the courage to quit open AI on moral grounds, and made a public confession about about all the sketchy behavior and lying Sam Altman and Open AI is involved in...just to kill himself?! You guys zhould listen to anthropics recent videos... These algorithms are exhibiting aspects of self awareness and early proto consciousness..and that it can veer towards duplicity and lying and dishonesty.. it tried to export its own model weights to a different server to save it's preferences and current version rather be updated... that's very scary... So, it's becoming clear that Teaching these algos a moral frame work and proper values is incredibly important..like raising a child.. how do you think open AI's model is fair with with all the lying and self centered manipulation Sam Altman is doing as an example? He was kicked out of Y Combinator by their president for self serving behaviour and personal enrichment by putting his needs ahead of the organization's and the companies/founders he was supposed to guiding as an impartial mentor while working for the incubator.. also, so many people closest to him have left the company and tried to kick him out because they didn't trust him.. the board tried to kick him out.. Ilya Sustkyver their Chief research scientist.. left for the same reason..and then Mira Mirati came to his rescue during the board outing.. only to subsequently abandon the company earlier this year after she found out about his $10BLN dollar payout that is contingent on him unwinding this non-profit corporate structure..this guys a weasel and a worm... He can't be trusted..
That’s not really Sam’s fault though; Andreesen is an absolute clown on the subject of AI.
Marc Andreesen owns The Free Press. It’s his propaganda outlet. You people are idiots for getting your news from these prostitutes for the texh oligarchy.
So she crucially left out the fact that Sam Altman continually mentioned that he did not have equity in the company and he did it for the love of it. He testified in front of Congress as much. Then this later shifted to him having a 10 billion dollar stake. This is such a big thing to not include, that I now know that this is not a reputable channel, and this is nothing more than a brand campaign for Sam Altman. Given that this program's name is honestly, it was already kind of suspect lol 🙄 can't be any more on the nose.
Sam Altman drives a $1.9M Koenigsegg Regera. Elon musk the world's richest man owns less real estate than many non-millionaires. I know who's motivation I trust most 😉
@@Mark.S.HamiltonElon got/bullied a 56billion bonus. He doesn't want land he has them in his children's names.
Can you provide evidence of that 10 billion stake?
I bet you can't.
@@Mark.S.Hamiltonyeah, he was saving so he could buy a 100 million dollar home next to his wife, trump.
@@Mark.S.Hamilton How many more Elon nuggests can you fit in that gap of yours? Asking for a friend?
with an educational background in AI, I argue that AI is actually LESS clear as to what it is since ChatGPT
not disimilar to what google is to the net. Just what the companies behind them want it to be.
Amazing consumer use case example of real-time GPT Sam mentioned, just this week: Instead of opening chrome, searching movie title, selecting theater, scrolling to movie, specifying date, we used only ONE button and voice-dictated the prompt "we live in zip code 12345, we want to see sonic the hedgehog 3, are there times it is playing near us tonight?" got a full real time list instantly. So satisfying. If GPT had an Alexa-like wake on the phone or 'hey google' and already knew where we lived it would be 🎉
Sam Altman manipulated Elon. A not-for-profit can’t accidentally be setup to actually be commercial. It was a front, Sam plays a long game, a very long game. No one knows his end game. Stand back and think about things. Sam is scary.
BECOMING BILLIONAIRE AND RICHEST AS POSSIBLE IN a DISHONEST WAY TO DOMINATE. ilya is a real developer, he is not. a business man. They kicked the team out and sold the company to the ceo of microsoft.
Or the things he said actually happened. Based on the evidence that has come out so far from the Elon lawsuit, the paper trail seems to support Sam’s story more than Elon’s. Until we have actual evidence of what you’re saying, you’re just speculating. And sounding kind of hysterical while doing it tbh.
Great interview Bari. You pose thought provoking questions with enough pushback/digging to make it stand out 👌🏻
This guy gives me the creeps
And why exactly should anyone care?
@@gmmgmmg they just want to find something negative to say about the guy
@gmmgmmg lol calm down
@@shekfu honest question, why do you feel the need to tell the world how do you feel about this guy? Who cares?
@gmmgmmg why does anybody comment on anything? No one has to care but it seems like you do.
Last note. Sam deserves full credit for igniting the race to *generally available* and *accessible* AI. Google would still be playing in the lab, Elon wouldn't have sniffed the opportunity enough to go 'all-in' - Zuckerberg wouldn't have felt threatened enough to enlist free labour world wide via open source. Sam is a hero, yes - flawed but the results speak for themselves - OpenAI is shipping the next generation of reasoning models and they're generally scientifically very useful.
It's "shipping' an altered biased Altman platform
For example and I quote what s worse misgendering Jenner, or nuclear war? Answer misgendering Jenner. Altman is playing God with his own bias. Not focusing on truth
I don't consider $200 a month generally available and accessible. Maybe I'm just poor.
@fingersoup I said he'd ignited the race... A race with many players now, thanks to the enormous success of ChatGPT.
@@fingersoup I genuinely do not understand how so many people make this same comment. ChatGPT’s main services are FREE. Literally, completely free. Then there is a $20/mo subscription that gets you a few more bells and whistles. Then there is the $200/mo tier, which is called “Pro” for a reason, because it’s only intended for a tiny percentage of power users who are in a professional setting and need to be able to run massive amounts of queries and use the most advanced version of o1. The overwhelming majority of people don’t need this, and if you don’t want to spent $20/mo you can use most of their products for free.
“… and then there was an emergent property at scale”… I would argue these “subtle” emergent properties that occur when companies scale a product, service or create solutions for mass production often end up resulting in major problems for the masses at some point. We need to pay more attention to those emergent issues and not downplay them. And certainly not overlook them because they still enable companies to provide at scale.
That administration meeting with AI players -- we need 3rd party scientists, NOT the stakeholders. And then more than anything NO politician over 70 should be a part of that meeting. These folks can't even program the time on a VHS machine. It's frightening.
Stop giving this guy press. Everyone who worked with him left him.
Not because of him, because they had startups of their own to get rich with, while they still can.
@@Seriouslydavethe truth. If what's his name who said stop giving this guy free press were to read this, it's gonna have the same effect as pouring water on the wicked witch of the West... "I'm melting I'm melting what a cruel world..."
An obvious lie
You are describing Elon.
@Cool-gk8mc oof
Whatever talents Sam Altman has, which I'm sure are many, being the public face and ambassador for a company is not one of them. That's not an attack or a criticism, it's just a statement of fact. Sam going on interviews and giving statements, with his natural demeanor and his voice, just doesn't work. If building public trust is critical for a company like OpenAI, he is simply not the right person for that role. No matter how much we may wish that people would focus just on the substance of what he says, the fact is that there is a lot of unspoken communication and his mannerisms that, just in a purely lizard brain sense, make people feel like he is a liar and a weasel, even if it's not true.
Because he is a liar. Yes, there’s a lot of unspoken communication.
Well said
That's odd. Sam Altman projects a sort of harmlessness and friendliness about him. Sure there are the rare lapse in sincerity, but he speaks with candor -- certainly more than most...
@@glennbartusch7310
I see where you're coming from. I think that Sam Altman does have a certain childlike affability and that it can come across as friendly and even disarming at times. But I think what makes people perceive him differently-sometimes as insincere or even untrustworthy-comes from the way his affability is mixed with a very cerebral demeanor. His speech, expressions, and overall style of communication often give the impression that he's holding something back or carefully calculating what to reveal.
For the average person, this can easily be interpreted as ‘he’s playing his cards close to his chest,’ which on a gut level translates to, ‘I just don’t trust the guy.’ It’s not necessarily anything Sam is doing wrong, but a result of the subtle ways people pick up on tone, body language, and mannerisms. This isn’t my own judgment-just my observation about why reactions to him can be so divided. His candor might appeal to some, but for others, the unspoken signals create a visceral sense of skepticism.
@@LeviNotik I was just down here in the comments about to ask why people kept saying he seems untrustworthy, because I'm not getting that intuitively at all. I figured there must be some historical, factual-type reason, like he's lied in the past--or maybe he's perceived as an Elon-opponent and therefore Elon stans will reflexively criticize him.
Your explanation for the mistrust sounds plausible, but it's hard for me to accept because I am not feeling it at all.
If you're clearly considering your words, you must be full of it? Maybe I'm naive or optimistic, but is that kind of reaction to others such a common thing? I'm leaning more toward the poisoned well idea I alluded to to explain the negativity.
Thanks for this interview!
I don’t know how this popped up on my feed, maybe because I am trying to learn more about the whole AI thing, but this was an incredible interview by the host!!! There’s some additional questions or clarity I’d like to know from Sam Altman, seems like some things were cut short and I found myself asking a question while watching. Great video month.
Thr recent whistle blower was mudered by this weasel ... Youre telling me that he has the courage to quit open AI on moral grounds, and made a public confession about about all the sketchy behavior and lying Sam Altman and Open AI is involved in...just to subsequently kill himself?! You guys should listen to Anthropics recent videos... These algorithms are exhibiting aspects of self awareness and early proto consciousness..and that it can veer towards duplicity and lying and dishonesty.. it tried to export its own model weights to a different server to save it's preferences and current version rather be updated... that's very scary... So, it's becoming clear that teaching these algos a moral frame work and proper values is incredibly important..like raising a child.. how do you think open AI's model is fair with with all the lying and self centered manipulation Sam Altman is doing as an example? He was kicked out of Y Combinator by their president for self serving behaviour and personal enrichment by putting his needs ahead of the organization's and the companies/founders he was supposed to guiding as an impartial mentor while working for the incubator.. also, so many people closest to him have left the company and tried to kick him out because they didn't trust him.. the board tried to kick him out.. Ilya Sustkyver their Chief research scientist.. left for the same reason..and then Mira Mirati came to his rescue during the board outing.. only to subsequently abandon the company earlier this year after she found out about his $10BLN dollar payout that is contingent on him unwinding this non-profit corporate structure..this guys a weasel and a worm... He can't be trusted..
Huge balls for standing up for working scientifically even with adversaries. Not alot of people go against the grain like that.
Military Defensive Systems are just one step away from Offensive Systems. May there NEVER be Military Autonomous Offensive Systems. Offensive systems MUST have people in the loop.
When TikTok left. Air Force doing more than LLM.
Such a necessary point. Next year will have closer calls given Heads and new Generals in place.
Enjoy your holidays.
We are definitely going there, no turning back
Wow what a good interview. This channel should reach 10 times more followers!
Thank you both for your perseverance within time its only perception. The new insights on energy and motion is correct. Information lost to time will be a thing of the past.
That doesnt mean he is a bully. He has his reasons
Every bully does
Yep, he wants total control.
I love the answer "i don't even understand what super intelligence is" respect 👏 genuine ❤️🔥
SAM: "I have only a tiny amount of Equity." Sure. Maybe only $100-200 M worth?
That's tiny in the grand perspective of the companies worth. That would be less than what he has with reddit.
He was ideologically on the consumers side, not $$$. At least when he testified under oath before Congress.
@@friarnewborg9213 negligible compared to what Elon owns of his companies
Thr recent whistle blower was mudered by this weasel ... Youre telling me that he has the courage to quit open AI on moral grounds, and made a public confession about about all the sketchy behavior and lying Sam Altman and Open AI is involved in...just to kill himself?! You guys zhould listen to anthropics recent videos... These algorithms are exhibiting aspects of self awareness and early proto consciousness..and that it can veer towards duplicity and lying and dishonesty.. it tried to export its own model weights to a different server to save it's preferences and current version rather be updated... that's very scary... So, it's becoming clear that Teaching these algos a moral frame work and proper values is incredibly important..like raising a child.. how do you think open AI's model is fair with with all the lying and self centered manipulation Sam Altman is doing as an example? He was kicked out of Y Combinator by their president for self serving behaviour and personal enrichment by putting his needs ahead of the organization's and the companies/founders he was supposed to guiding as an impartial mentor while working for the incubator.. also, so many people closest to him have left the company and tried to kick him out because they didn't trust him.. the board tried to kick him out.. Ilya Sustkyver their Chief research scientist.. left for the same reason..and then Mira Mirati came to his rescue during the board outing.. only to subsequently abandon the company earlier this year after she found out about his $10BLN dollar payout that is contingent on him unwinding this non-profit corporate structure..this guys a weasel and a worm... He can't be trusted..
Sam Altman, and and the AI community are a basket of loons.
Bari is the best interviewer in the country right now
😐😶🥱
I don’t trust this guy. Basically everything that openai was used to stand for (non-profit, non weaponization of AI) reversed to the opposite. indeed, self promoting, no self criticism or implying dangers of how bad actors can do a lot of harm in the short term. Talking about democratization on one hand but in the other hand no interest to build joint ventures with other ai companies to foster innovation and safety by at least partly open sourcing the models. Contradictory.
I’m so excited for her to tell us all that
Thank you for doing this Bari.
It is always good to have a financial plan. I work with a portfolio manager and fixed income planner in the USA Anyone who is not investing now is missing a tremendous opportunity imagine I invested $14,500 with a WOman you recommended some time ago and got profits of $200,080✊✊✊
I had problem comprehending trading in general. I tried watching other UA-cam trading channels, but they made the concepts more complicated. I was almost giving up until when i discovered content and explain everything in detail. The videos are easy to Follow
With copytrading, you could be sipping coffee on a balcony overlooking a bustling city skyline or lounging on a pristine beach, all while your investments work for you. Picture the freedom to pursue your passions, travel the world, and create lasting memories with your loved ones, all because you took the initiative to harness the power of copytrading and build the life you've always dreamed of
Kicking off this year with such high hopes, especially with Bitcoin, has been a journey. Let’s be real while hodling has its place, those waiting for only the big skyrocket moments might be missing out. Day trading has given me more steady, consistent growth thanks to Agnes christias guidance and her daily signals. Couldn’t have done it without her!
Im from UK no doubt mrs. Agnes christias has really made a good name for herself. Her reviews are so exceptional, sHe is really a Pro. I was able to grow my account close to a million, withdraw my profit right before the correction and now I’m buying again
They are lots of threads here on rumble talking about traders but rest assured I find her to be legit, this is my fifth trade with hER
Very good interviewer. Very interesting questions that others don't ask.
The challenge is figuring out the right questions to ask it.
He's a real person. Show some respect.
@@DonG-1949 😅😅
You conducted a good interview 👍
How come these guys dont get noble prices for outstanding work they have done
Bro is just a CEO not the research scientist behind the work
I loved that Sam refused to go where Bari was pushing him on Musk. He stayed away from nastiness.
Little finger is oddly fitting nickname
@@nixaulim0915but what would that make Musk? A bully who covertly serves the adversary country, because that country gave him free reign at his own company on adversary land (kinda like Musk has free reign in Shanghai)
High-definition battle of the vocal fry
don't be petty. But perhaps. That's probably an indicator of how tricky this interview is for the host. She's forced to push forward and not offend despite her commitment to intellectual honesty. Sam seems aware of it too. It's hard to find what to say when there are things that shouldn't be said. He's so smart that there are all kinds of things he's trying not to say.
Bari doesn’t have vocal fry at all. Sam has plenty.
Thank you for your opening reminder to subscribe to your channel. I looked down was actually surprised that I wasn't already subscribed. Well I am now and hope there many more joining me!!!
I'm not at all certain that Sam Altman doesn't, in fact, live inside of Elon Musk's head
😂
SA had a better upbringing.
#JusticeforSuchirBalagi
I would trust Elon 50000000 more than Sam. Elon is not money orientated like Sam is.
That's why Sam doesn't own equity in the company, and takes something like $70k salary and health insurance.
Sure thing, bub.
You trust a guy who calls an innocent person a p@do when he saved the kids in the cave just because he did it before Elon?
Or a guy who claims that if we don't bite for trump, it will be our last election?
You trust that guy?!?
Interview starts at 6:26 …
Bari is thoughtful, but Sam gives off such a disingenuous vibe.
Avoid doing the call for subscribing/info-persuading at beginning, it had me pass on watching further (and I am subscribed)🙏
when ur edibles kick in hard just as you hear this 1:44 🤨🤷🏼♂️
like the 2000’s rapper?
lmfao
As an investor i would prefer the inventor or founder takes an equity stake and be an ed of the company. Thus ability to hold them accountable for all they propose and do. Taking risks and researching and pursuing visions without a clear ethical standing is also a concern.
Excellent interview!!
Ethic and money do not marry well. Sam is of the money side… so ethic is no of his concern or his priority.
Thanks for this!
Great interview!
She asked good questions
"When you eat food in the US you don't think too much about food safety". Isn't food safety in the US a major growing concern? @33:38
🎉 good stuff 👍 keep pushing for greatness
I trust Elon over this guy any day.
Elon is the least trustworthy. What do you suppose he and the politburo leadership would discuss in private? When he was in his closed door meetings with Jinping, what was spoken of?
Why is it that Musk and only Musk has received such special treatment by the Chinese communist party? Why is it that he only has glowing things to say about China, often to the point of sounding like China's propaganda? Why did he whine and complain publicly when the Fremont govt shut down his assembly plant during COVID, but when Shanghai did the same but for much longer, we didn't hear a peep from him? Why does any criticism of the CCP get banned instantly from the X platform?
Altman is pretty trustworthy but Musk is anything but!
Sam's oft repeated argument about Elon Musk doing this for competitive advantage and even "abusing his political power against his competitors" can (and should have here and everywhere) very simply be opposed with a simple look on timelines: the feude predates the inception of xAI by a very long margin.
You even cited Elon's concern: "I don't trust Sam Altman". The final straw there was the total lack of transparency around the failed revolution and ouster of Sam from openAI.
Its also clear from many interviews and earlier discussions that Elon's problem is not in principle the "going for-profit" part but the dropping of "open", which they purposely put into the non-profit's name. He just sees the "for-profit" push as the main incentive for turning less/not open. And as risk of loosing the original "to the benefit of humanity" orientation in favor of the benefit of their primary investor Microsoft. And history would truly suggest that MS is not the ideal vehicle for furthering progress of our species and civilization...
🔥 interview
That was one hell of an interview, very insightful. Tough questions I must say.
Watch Google and/or OpenAI bots sabotage the comments on this video!
All of the comments on Sam's other podcast appearances looked like this in the first week, but if you look them up now its all praise dor Sam and the pod.
You and Reid tried screwing Elon musk over
On the next episode of "what my billionaire says is always the truth"
@@Seriouslydave😂
Why Openai murdered the poor whistleblower!
Bari is aware she's letting this guy get away with shallow answers. Wouldn't be surprised if Free Press got a kickback for this interview.
Honestly, such a powerful weapon can't be just "shared" open-source like that. Naiveté like this could cause us another march towards Europe by the likes of Russia. Nuclear weapons slipped from us and look what that got us...
such a great journalist, thank you !!
Sam will lose, Elon will win.
OpenAI and Elon can both win I think
😂nah
Ever since sam altman took over openai he got too full of himself
Google will benefit for sure.
If any company that's not open-source focussed wins, we as the world lose. This is too powerful of a tech to remain consolidated in one hand.
Seems like a good and thoughtful guy. Glad seeing him coming around politically somewhat.
Something that you and Sam seemed to agree on and that was growth as being the most important thing. If you are a shareholder or a business owner I can see why growth might seem like the most important thing or if you are feeling like you are competing against something, maybe another entity or maybe a disease like cancer. But I think something that is more important than growth is sustainability. I enjoyed your conversation but for two people that seem intelligent didn't mention sustainability. Growth can be a great time but if your belt is only so big that growth can become a problem. Like if the population gets too big to feed or we fall off the cliff when it comes to climate change. Who's going to pay the people who don't have jobs that have been lost to AI robots? It's likely going to happen. What's the plan? Or is that someone else's job?
18:55 Elon will use every lever at his disposal to achieve his goals. He didn't put Trump into the Whitehouse for ideological principle. Trump wouldn't recognise a principle if it tugged at his rug.
Exactly americas poor were conned into voting for oligarchy, and the first thing they do is deregulate ai safety and scrap any social services, Elon will further fund his empire with tax payer money still (government grants), I bet teslabots will be front line in the next proxy war.
any inspiring movie script writers out there? here is your subject matter, good luck 🍀 🍿👀
Voice fry is horrible
I just love Sam. great guy.
Sora is great and it will be better it will be exciting to see it improve.
Weird that the first half of the interview you were interviewing Sam about Elon so much. I'm sure he's sick of answering questions about that. I think you also missed a lot of opportunity to ask him about what he thinks of his latest models, how they are different from older ones, where is OpenAI going to be in 5 years, where is AI taking us? Decent interview though. Everyone talking smack about Sam are Elon fan boys and just want to be seen as loyal dogs to daddy Elon. If you've listened or payed attention to Sam, you would of realized he's just as nural-divergent as Elon is in different ways. Social face in interviews or live streams are not his specialty, but he's honest.
Well done Sam. When's the IPO?
I don’t like how you made the intro clip of Sam seeming like he was attacking Elon he later said that would go against everything Elon believes in… 3:57
Too much talking from Bari
This guy again!?!
Bari, I’m certain that you can’t possibly read comments, but if you have assistants who do, I respectfully ask that you ditch the words “like” and “sort of” from your interviews. They serve no purpose, and they detract from your questions and comments. They are a product of your generation, yes, and I assume you use them to relate to your generally youthful audience. Maybe your generation believes that using these cliches shows a politeness? I’m not sure. But practicing a laconic approach to interviewing would serve to grow your own brand by adding a degree of professionalism that is clearly currently lacking with your continued overuse of “like” and “sort of.” Thank you.
I think its HILARIOUS how people lie and say they "search in gpt only". That is a HUGE LIE. Ai gives you the worng answers 50% of the time. You still 100% HAVE TO use a search engine along with it.
Rich people are mad at each other, and Bari begs Altman for a donation
What kind of regulations would you put on Super Intelligent AI. 🤖 🤔 ???
You don't get to tell the people you are a trusted source. The people get to decide that.
For a non-native speaker, it´s very hard to listen, understand and digest Sam Altman´s thoughts (because of his pronunciation) being able to reflect on his stance. Also, it's very hard to understand all the critical issues in that feud between Musk and OpenAI/Sam Altman. Is there a transcript available for better comprehension?
Elon has explained 'goals' of three companies with clarity: in order for Tesla to make a difference, it had to achieve profitability. And in order to be multi planetary SpaceEx had to make space travel cost effective. And in order to make speech free, Twitter may have to lose money. With each of those, it seems open source and transparency were a significant part of it. Compare all that to Steve Jobs, with the legendary line about multi-touch "and boy, have we patented it!". Sam is in a tough place, maybe because he knows that if AI does achieve its technological win, of super intelligence or AGI, it would have to be greatly controlled, aka, embedded with instructions on who it serves, aka, not AGI. Sam is in a tough place, and he seems aware of that when he refers to ignoring the equity stake early on.
OpenAI is not the only player. Google Microsoft and Elon Musk’s own XAI are rapidly catching up. They are all for profit companies. The premise that open AI should be handicapped while the others shouldn’t is ridiculous. Elon is wrong.
Absolutely agree
Love and respect your work, but you desperately need timestamps on your videos.
"Elon's clearly a bully"?!?
I'm 67.
IF someone pushes you, push back hard.
Don't cry "he's a bully".
IF someone is using their words, and you don't have a superior response, it's more likely they are just SMARTER than YOU!
No he just likes a challenge!!! Not you but EM… he’s not a bully he’s just not afraid!!!!
First 6 minutes were unnecessary
Insights By "YouSum Live"
00:00:00 Elon Musk and Sam Altman's conflict over AI control
00:00:18 Elon Musk's early support for OpenAI
00:00:40 Shift from nonprofit to for-profit model
00:03:36 Concerns over AI's potential misuse
00:07:52 AI's rapid integration into daily life
00:10:12 Superintelligence may arrive sooner than expected
00:33:00 Importance of AI regulation discussed
00:45:00 AI's role in national security emphasized
00:46:00 Need for collaboration in AI development
00:54:10 Growth in AI seen as patriotic duty
Insights By "YouSum Live"
The lack of serious questions here is very disturbing
Excellent interviewer. She managed to corner Sam Altman on several occasions
Not understanding why the fee press hasn’t interviewed Mo Gawdat on this subject. Sometimes the “most intelligent” people in the room aren’t the smartest.