F22 didn’t have the first production AESA that was on a chilean Boeing 707 early warning aircraft, and if you want to then say no you meant on a fighter it’s the J-APG 1 on the Mitsubishi F2.
India has also developed AESA radar (Uttam). Although for now it is Gallium arsenide based, but in a year or so India will also have developed Gallium Nitrite based array which is easier to cool
This technology is similar to how Star-link works. It can both send and receive data. The antenna is stationary while the array uses technology to allow it to 'scan' over a wide field of view.
First aesa radar was the one of the mig31, launch at the beginning of the 80’s… usa had just follow and France 🇫🇷 a few years after. Mig 31 aesa radar had a specificity, it’s the only one who work on 2 differents bands, x and L, which allow a better range of detection. He also allow low altitude detection, through l16 mig31 are linked all together and they can share data, 4 of them are enough to cover 560 km of front. Good luck.🍀
Maybe aesa radar is invisible to a conventional radar sending heat flare like background noise but surely and an 0.7m interference tube cantenna to satellite dish Will detect any any metal object hidden behind the clouds just using uT metal detector phone app in the node quater of wavelength. You wont cheat that with random noise
You underestimate the Russians? They have the Himalayan AESA with a target detection of 400km further than that of the F-22 and they are installing them now to Su-35 in addition to Su-57.
they have shit. Their AESA radar is an old technology. The N036 have slotted antennas and the Zhuk-AM a patch or ring antennas. American AESA radars use notch antennas.
'wurrld', not 'worrld', no matter where you live. Sorry for being pedantic, but the more people hear wrong pronunciation, the more they think it is correct.
appreciate posting the vid but the outline of it is pretty horrible. go from point a to b. not a to z let me talk about y wait before that t. not trying to be negative but it is rather jarring andtakes away from the presentation a bit .
maybe better the original radar for the f-35, but the new one being made for the f-35 that is CURRENTLY being put in them is 100% better than what the su-57 may have
lol - the chance of anyone having enough information to make an informed comparison of both radars AND be able to talk about it publicly is ...um .....zero
@@superskullmaster the problem in your opinion is the same what NATO sufferd , you have no information of how many SU-57 are operable , otherways you would`nt state this kind of Question ! i think that Russia forced his manufacturer to bust it ratio in Production of this Model !
@@saab35drakenenjoyer62 you state this comment without any knowing about specifications and under very propaganda of NATO. or you was flying SU-57 "FELON" by yourself ???!!
For those who want to know more on the working principle, look up phased arrays.
F22 didn’t have the first production AESA that was on a chilean Boeing 707 early warning aircraft, and if you want to then say no you meant on a fighter it’s the J-APG 1 on the Mitsubishi F2.
The Gripen-E also have AESA
India has also developed AESA radar (Uttam). Although for now it is Gallium arsenide based, but in a year or so India will also have developed Gallium Nitrite based array which is easier to cool
Great work! Thank you!!
Yes, great vork!
This technology is similar to how Star-link works. It can both send and receive data. The antenna is stationary while the array uses technology to allow it to 'scan' over a wide field of view.
star-link is similar to how AESA radars work, AESA radars have been here longer, so they should be the object of comparison
F22 is not the first fighter to have AESA, it's F2 Mitsubishi that got it first.
So did the Mig-31 Zaslon radar in the 1980’s
@@GhostRider-hp3te Mig-31 is the first aircraft to Have PESA radar not AESA
@@jonlaurenzreyes1902 I was responding to the beam steering thank mechanically steering
I agree with you brother.
Wrong, F-18s had them back in 2000. I used to partially troubleshoot these radars with Consolidated Automated Support System.
AESA is...the future technology fighter jet....
it's a current technology
It is also used on combat ships of all size, even small patrol boats.
Thnkyou,brother.
Love this vdeo.
Hv nice day too...🙏👍👍😊👌👌
Wished to learn more, but still - goosd material. Thank You. Thumb up & subscribed.
Thank you
First aesa radar was the one of the mig31, launch at the beginning of the 80’s… usa had just follow and France 🇫🇷 a few years after. Mig 31 aesa radar had a specificity, it’s the only one who work on 2 differents bands, x and L, which allow a better range of detection. He also allow low altitude detection, through l16 mig31 are linked all together and they can share data, 4 of them are enough to cover 560 km of front. Good luck.🍀
No, that is a PESA. First air operational AESA was actually the Swedish Erieye.
@@patriklind545 They copied from PESA. PESA gave them the idea to create AESA.
Thanks. That's how the USA distorts/alter history to give USA credit for inventing everything.
@@patriklind545 PESA led the development of the AESA radar.
@@patriklind545The first AESA on an airplane was not used as AWAC like Eareye and on a fighter it was the Mitshubishi J2 if i remember correctly.
Its only really useful in sams. Sarh missiles aren't really used anymore so hard locks aren't required
Very good, but it would be so much better if you had a Human do the narration. Many words get pronounced very oddly with a bot.
I really hate AI videos. Just the worst.
That's amazing. I didn't know that.
And Türkiye is also producing his own aesa radar system called Murad
and there is another one, fartogan....
Turk oldugunuz stealth yerine ghost demenizden anlasiliyor.
If you play dcs nd know how old f18 15 16 radar works…u know this is the game changer.
Maybe aesa radar is invisible to a conventional radar sending heat flare like background noise but surely and an 0.7m interference tube cantenna to satellite dish Will detect any any metal object hidden behind the clouds just using uT metal detector phone app in the node quater of wavelength. You wont cheat that with random noise
How do the radio waves change direction pls
Using phased array principles.
Good video
You underestimate the Russians? They have the Himalayan AESA with a target detection of 400km further than that of the F-22 and they are installing them now to Su-35 in addition to Su-57.
f-22 is over 20 years old lol!
They also use google maps and android phones for navigation.
@@ml1186 And you believe that. lol. Glonass is just floating in space wasting space.
they have shit. Their AESA radar is an old technology.
The N036 have slotted antennas and the Zhuk-AM a patch or ring antennas.
American AESA radars use notch antennas.
F-22 is over 20+ years old lol
Russia is 20 a 30 years behind U.S in radar technology
China is #1 in radar technology then US then Russia
@@ahmadalastal5303 first its South africa
0:40 America is not a country, it is 2 continents.
This is not very accurate
Made by the Dutch ;)
Is that all? I thought with the advent of computer, we can hve much much better technology than this. What a load of baby boomers tech!
'wurrld', not 'worrld', no matter where you live. Sorry for being pedantic, but the more people hear wrong pronunciation, the more they think it is correct.
please write more annoying.
fucking hell, this is torture.
Now, lets talk about A E S A RADAR, First let me explain blablabal
😂😂😂
appreciate posting the vid but the outline of it is pretty horrible. go from point a to b. not a to z let me talk about y wait before that t. not trying to be negative but it is rather jarring andtakes away from the presentation a bit .
F-22 is getting a 10.9 BILLION dollar upgrade.
Never going to subscribe
Russians have the AESA radar in the nose of the Su-57 and it is comparable if not better to the F-35's.
How many SU-57’s are flying again? Russia does not prioritize AirPower, we do. Russia prioritizes air defense.
maybe better the original radar for the f-35, but the new one being made for the f-35 that is CURRENTLY being put in them is 100% better than what the su-57 may have
lol - the chance of anyone having enough information to make an informed comparison of both radars AND be able to talk about it publicly is ...um .....zero
@@superskullmaster the problem in your opinion is the same what NATO sufferd , you have no information of how many SU-57 are operable , otherways you would`nt state this kind of Question !
i think that Russia forced his manufacturer to bust it ratio in Production of this Model !
@@saab35drakenenjoyer62 you state this comment without any knowing about specifications and under very propaganda of NATO. or you was flying SU-57 "FELON" by yourself ???!!