hmm, sad that the title is total emission, while the chart is for annual. not the same. also, if you use annual data, why the heck you use non existing countries?
All the data on this topic uses existing countries with their present day borders. It's not on the channel for using the data. This is of course adds limitations, but it introduces a standardization that would otherwise make collecting this data extremely difficult.
The title is wrong. This is annual not the total emissions. US and EU emtted a lot more CO2 than China. Total CO2 emissions in percentage USA 25% EU 22% China 12.7% India 6% Russia 6% Canada 2%
Thank you for sharing this video as it's an important one which presents one data set, of many, that is a part of a much larger discussion. I also understand the topic of Co2 emissions gets nuanced pretty quick as annual (or total) emissions are just one part of the overall Co2 emissions subset of the overall "climate change" discussion. Finally, I recognize that the represented nations reflect today's national boundaries and that the older the data is, the less fidelity there is in the data as technology & precision degrades the further back you go in time, which can be said with any and every topic. Thank you again for sharing this.
This is graph of pollutions year by year. Not cumlulative pollutions at all. It must be understand properly. We need every year measurement of pollution producers to compare, how it is.
Carbon emssions do not matter, if there is more in the air, plants grow faster. Once it dropped low, plants grow slower, until its back where it has been ever since we can measure the content about 150 years ago, nothing changed.
You have got to be kidding me. China has higher CO2 emission due to the fact that they produce many products for the world and that they are more industrialised. India has lower CO2 emission because they have yet to achieve the industrialisation level. China has been making strides in renewable energy, before long we will see CO2 emission peaking. To add on, should put another video on CO2 emission per capita
It's guesswork, but there's a lot of historical data that can be used to infer historical emissions (fuel consumption data, data on finished products, historical prices, records of machinery, etc.) We can get some useful insights from this even if there's a lot of uncertainty in these estimations.
hmm, sad that the title is total emission, while the chart is for annual. not the same. also, if you use annual data, why the heck you use non existing countries?
All the data on this topic uses existing countries with their present day borders. It's not on the channel for using the data. This is of course adds limitations, but it introduces a standardization that would otherwise make collecting this data extremely difficult.
But yeah, I expected cumulative emissions based on the title.
The title is wrong. This is annual not the total emissions. US and EU emtted a lot more CO2 than China.
Total CO2 emissions in percentage
USA 25%
EU 22%
China 12.7%
India 6%
Russia 6%
Canada 2%
Wrong title!
Annual not total emissions.
Thank you for sharing this video as it's an important one which presents one data set, of many, that is a part of a much larger discussion. I also understand the topic of Co2 emissions gets nuanced pretty quick as annual (or total) emissions are just one part of the overall Co2 emissions subset of the overall "climate change" discussion.
Finally, I recognize that the represented nations reflect today's national boundaries and that the older the data is, the less fidelity there is in the data as technology & precision degrades the further back you go in time, which can be said with any and every topic.
Thank you again for sharing this.
If the term carbon emission was changed to wealth and political influence it would give a greater understanding of world history.
This is graph of pollutions year by year. Not cumlulative pollutions at all. It must be understand properly. We need every year measurement of pollution producers to compare, how it is.
Did someone noticed there is no year 1994.
World Championship of Football (soccer) in USA made the world to forget about emitting Co2.
Carbon emssions do not matter, if there is more in the air, plants grow faster.
Once it dropped low, plants grow slower, until its back where it has been ever since we can measure the content about 150 years ago, nothing changed.
Stop lying.
You seem to know better than all the scientists who have studied this subject all their lives. This is utter nonsense.
I see, the Sovietunion never existed.
India has larger population than China but only 1/4 of CO2 emission. This shows how advanced India is!!! China should learn from India.
You have got to be kidding me. China has higher CO2 emission due to the fact that they produce many products for the world and that they are more industrialised. India has lower CO2 emission because they have yet to achieve the industrialisation level.
China has been making strides in renewable energy, before long we will see CO2 emission peaking.
To add on, should put another video on CO2 emission per capita
China is the world's factory, producing most of the world's industrial products. This is where China’s carbon dioxide emissions come from
@@ck1416 he has no rain
@@ck1416 China might already have reached peak emissions this year.
With an industry nearly eight times the size of India's and less than four times its carbon dioxide emissions, China is far ahead of India
Germany 1953= Germany 2023👍
Home…
Please do these per capitalist!!!
Damn auto correct "capita(sp)"
China ...just, WOW
Where did they get these figures from??? Anything prior to 1940 has to be pure guesswork! What a load of shite
It's guesswork, but there's a lot of historical data that can be used to infer historical emissions (fuel consumption data, data on finished products, historical prices, records of machinery, etc.) We can get some useful insights from this even if there's a lot of uncertainty in these estimations.
9years biology is green life need co2 and doing food