What is Aether? A history of the debate about the substance of the universe by Jeff Yee.

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 20 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 819

  • @0ldblo0d45
    @0ldblo0d45 4 роки тому +48

    It’s seems common sense to me that as it is with every single medium. A wave cannot travel if there is no medium to pass through. In space light travels and it changes color and wave length depending what medium it is going through. It almost seems like common sense to believe that space is simply not empty, but rather filled with different particle at different temperatures and pressures. A “new kind of medium” for light and other things to travel through.

    • @1Flyingfist
      @1Flyingfist 3 роки тому +5

      But we are taught at senior school level, that it isn't empty though. It's filled with subatomic particles.
      At the very very least, you were taught that those particles that come off the sun (the solar wind) are the reason that a comet's tail points away from the sun.
      You are only told that it's empty at primary / elementary school level. 🤔

    • @pumpkingamebox
      @pumpkingamebox 2 роки тому

      If parallel lines that are crossing another line at 90 degrees each (what makes them parallel), then that means they will never intersect. Said Euclide, inventor of math, or maybe definer of math?
      Anyway. Parallel lines cannot intersect no matter how long they are, therefore they’re parallel, right? Seems logical, rational, commons sense. But yet in quantum physics they do intersect.
      To me this just goes to show how irrational the world truly is, and that you can’t simply say “It’s logical, therefore it is.” The world is much stranger and weirder than you can possible imagine. Like the 4th dimension, it’s extremely hard to imagine what living in one would be like. We’re limited by our understanding of the universe.

    • @ReaperOfTheSpirit
      @ReaperOfTheSpirit Рік тому

      You are right there is a aether. What the guy in the video failed to mention is that there was two options the earth isn't rotating or there isn't a eather that people believed and understood for hundreds of years.
      But the earth not rotating went against there Godless pseudoscience space religion.

    • @ZalamaTheDragonGod
      @ZalamaTheDragonGod Рік тому +1

      ​@@1Flyingfistsafe to say the sun isn't the reason for photon waves. PS, most of space is empty per cubic meter, a near perfect vacuum.

    • @1Waarheid
      @1Waarheid Рік тому

      @@ZalamaTheDragonGod What happens when you open a bottle of soda?.... That's why we have a CL os ED system.

  • @Arkane117
    @Arkane117 3 роки тому +46

    Nikola Tesla talked about the aether and his understanding of it is probably one of the keys to all his inventions...

    • @1Waarheid
      @1Waarheid Рік тому +3

      Long before him this was already known and used.

    • @Arkane117
      @Arkane117 Рік тому +5

      @@1Waarheid yes of course. Not saying Tesla first to discover it.

    • @LordDeBahs
      @LordDeBahs Рік тому

      cathedrals,pyraminds were able to extract aether . hidden in plain sight

    • @Parablecode
      @Parablecode 10 місяців тому +1

      @@1Waarheid Damn, you lack reading comprehension.

    • @weltschmerzistofthaufig2440
      @weltschmerzistofthaufig2440 7 місяців тому

      Tesla didn't use the aether to make his inventions, and not all of his claims were true. The aether doesn't exist.

  • @trentonoliver6328
    @trentonoliver6328 5 років тому +144

    It is a Minecraft mod that we all used to believe to be an actual thing and tried to build a portal for it

    • @user-rl5kg8fn9z
      @user-rl5kg8fn9z 4 роки тому +5

      True

    • @keithrich2761
      @keithrich2761 4 роки тому +4

      Einstein proved you right🤣🤣🤣🤣

    • @visheshgupta6962
      @visheshgupta6962 3 роки тому +3

      Its nether not either

    • @RujiNight
      @RujiNight 3 роки тому +3

      its also the main character in genshin impact

    • @AlexRubio
      @AlexRubio 3 роки тому

      @@keithrich2761 Einstein was a fraud. Nikola Tesla knew this. This video doesn't explain anything good long have they tried to prove gravity?

  • @cdscan2636
    @cdscan2636 4 роки тому +131

    There is a big difference between failing to detect something vs. proving it doesn't exist. The ether provides a very simple way to explain what Electric Fields and Magnetic Fields are made of, why some "particles" are massless, removes the duality of light mystery, and what gravity is. It also makes it easy to discuss longitudinal propagation at speeds much higher than the traditional speed of light. However it means putting away a century of superstitious belief systems embedded in Physics. It is very embarrassing and inconvenient.... The mathematics works both ways.

    • @ajitkumar1579
      @ajitkumar1579 3 роки тому +12

      Thanks very critical things you mentioned... Gravity is a pull (distortion) in aether

    • @cdscan2636
      @cdscan2636 3 роки тому +6

      @@ajitkumar1579 Light is a ripple in the ether. A ripple in water has energy, A ripple in the ether has energy. What is the rest mass of a ripple. ie. the ether makes it easy to explain the rest mass of a "photon"?

    • @substantivalism6787
      @substantivalism6787 3 роки тому +7

      Proposing an aether explains nothing at all. Early aether ideas were just abstract analogous models from our everday circumstances in attempting to model known phenomenon. As time went on this concept of the aether grew so vague. . . its the vacuum particles, the Higgs field, Spacetime, the electromagnetic field. . . that you could define it as:
      Aether: thing that does the thing we observe.
      In reality such a concept is useless in this respect and the only way it wouldn't be is if you proposed a new mathematical/abstract model. . . but this wouldn't be unique to aether models and the concept of an aether would have proved to be useless in proposing successful models. As it all boils down to not what phenomenon are but what they do and how we can predict this.

    • @nathanneiman
      @nathanneiman 3 роки тому +2

      @@cdscan2636 The aether has very low mass, maybe it's massless. Even so the aether should be matter, because it has at least two physical properties, permeability and permittivity. We know mass is a measure of electromagnetic energy.

    • @TheArtWithinYou3
      @TheArtWithinYou3 3 роки тому +1

      Photons are massless so as glucons its all energy. Its simple. Human makes everything so damn complexity with all their ignorance. Eye mean study the body, we are light. Light needs a medium which is solid. Our body is the medium for light. Light is only a vehicle for energy. Humans have to codified everything even their existence to bring it down in order for them to comprehend anything. Their uniqueness is their unit of measure, as we were taught 1+1=2. 1+1 never has equal 2 n never will. Its one force, not 2, 3, 4 or 5. Uno. Humans brain retarded.

  • @truthbetold818
    @truthbetold818 5 років тому +29

    They didn't fail, they simply proved the earth was motionless. Sagnac proved the existence of the Aether. Einstein had to say there was no aether to maintain the heliocentric lie

    • @LionofLight777
      @LionofLight777 5 років тому +10

      ....Mutually agreed!...Albert Einstein was a hoax and a fool,but a fool who was wise enough to know and understand who the Real Genius was and so he was always secretly consulting that genius. That remarkable man he consulted was known as Nikola Tesla!...That's all...Shalom

    • @Larson3575vc
      @Larson3575vc 5 років тому +4

      Right. The earth is motionless. The aether is moving!

  • @kingcosworth2643
    @kingcosworth2643 3 роки тому +20

    I'm sure the Aether absolutely exists and has zero density. The concept of something existing with no mass seems greatly counter-intuitive but the fact is electromagnetic fields absolutely exist and are measurable, but have zero mass, the field has to be travel through something. Aether and gravity are intertwined. It's amazing to think that absolutely everything in the universe not only orbits around another object, but really everything is orbiting around each other. The gravitational field that exists between earth and an object on the other side of the universe would be beyond tiny, but it exists, and due to there been zero friction in the Aether, this miniscule force does act on these bodies. Every object in the universe is connected by a force of energy.

    • @nicholasbeckwith7055
      @nicholasbeckwith7055 Рік тому +2

      What's crazy is that the electromagnetism pairs with the earths magnetism , gravity is literally combined / inseparable with magnetic fields which by the way never stand still right so that is what's described as Aether let's gooo

    • @WtfYoutube_YouSuck
      @WtfYoutube_YouSuck 11 місяців тому

      Gravity isn't a force

    • @weltschmerzistofthaufig2440
      @weltschmerzistofthaufig2440 7 місяців тому +1

      Please stop conflating aether with quantum fields.

    • @weltschmerzistofthaufig2440
      @weltschmerzistofthaufig2440 7 місяців тому +1

      ​@@nicholasbeckwith7055 I'm not sure where you heard that gravity has been unified with electromagnetism, but it's not true whatsoever.

    • @MrMoose1347
      @MrMoose1347 5 місяців тому

      Dont twist this please. Fix or delete the comment

  • @GiraelCS
    @GiraelCS 23 дні тому +1

    I would suggest looking up Norbert Feist's ultrasonic Michelson-Morley experiment. I believe the core assumptions applied in the original MM experiment about the expected nature of wave propagation in mechanical media is the crux of the issue of the null result.
    Mr. Feist's experiment indicates that mechanical waves (in air), measured in an analogous way to EM waves in the MM experiment (sent from a source to a reflective surface and bounced back to the detector next to the source), result in a two-way (average) speed that does depend on (decrease with) the velocity of the measurement system relative to the medium, however it is spacially ISOTROPIC, therefore it cannot be detected with an interferometer.
    If we can explain how this happens in mechanical media, then we can extrapolate and use it to reconstruct a new model of the Aether with this principle in mind, so that it's finally consistent with the MM experiments and, consequently, with all experiments testing the so called Lorentz's invariance. All that while still allowing for superluminal speed, as well as absolute space and time.

    • @EnergyWaveTheory
      @EnergyWaveTheory  23 дні тому +1

      Yes, agree with you and it would be great if it could be extrapolated from other experiments that we can do and measure.

  • @Kyle_Mortonx
    @Kyle_Mortonx 4 роки тому +58

    In one of my dreams I was told I was connected to the Aether, still trying to interpret it. It was a very powerful dream

    • @bobthebutler
      @bobthebutler 4 роки тому +9

      It would have ment that you would have been connected to the reality. You connected to a infinity stone😂

    • @Kyle_Mortonx
      @Kyle_Mortonx 4 роки тому +2

      @@bobthebutler 😎

    • @aburns9396
      @aburns9396 4 роки тому +5

      Had a similar dream years ago. I'd like to read more about your dream. I have considered publishing my trip as well

    • @susanbohannon2603
      @susanbohannon2603 4 роки тому

      @@eclipse369. Then why is it wrong. Support your correction if you can

    • @kirocket1226
      @kirocket1226 4 роки тому

      Go threw the Minecraft portal then it’s calling you

  • @eugeniusbear2297
    @eugeniusbear2297 3 роки тому +12

    I have been searching for this for about 6 years now. Michaelson-Morley has underlying assumptions which are never articulated that perfectly explain why one would expect to achieve the null result. Assumption #1 - the Aether is a field that extends UNIFORMLY in all directions. Assumption #2 - the Aether does not rotate locally about the experimental apparatus.

    • @kuklama0706
      @kuklama0706 Рік тому +2

      It seems ether sticks to massive celestial bodies like a jelly to a spoon.

    • @austinschleicher9797
      @austinschleicher9797 Рік тому +2

      Is this basically what dark matter might be??

    • @eugeniusbear2297
      @eugeniusbear2297 Рік тому +2

      @@austinschleicher9797 Yes

    • @austinschleicher9797
      @austinschleicher9797 Рік тому

      @@eugeniusbear2297 really interesting, I’ve never heard of the Aether concept before watching this, but that’s what it immediately reminded me of.

    • @weltschmerzistofthaufig2440
      @weltschmerzistofthaufig2440 7 місяців тому +1

      ​@@austinschleicher9797 No, this is not dark matter.

  • @mattgassenheimer
    @mattgassenheimer 5 років тому +55

    The Aether is the Reality Stone
    Duh

    • @LionofLight777
      @LionofLight777 5 років тому +2

      ....Mutually agreed! And therefore all material reality that has substance and physicality in the known three dimensional realm maintains it's existence thru the Aetherforce that surrounds us...That's all...Shalom

    • @ganapathisubramanians7928
      @ganapathisubramanians7928 4 роки тому

      Waaaat?????

  • @rod3134
    @rod3134 5 років тому +31

    You have hit it correctly!!! There is a intense effort to keep the basics of the ether wave theory out of the concept of the human mind. When it becomes realized how simple ether physics is ... Is when the truth of our material and energetic existence will be made manifest. All limits will be broken upon this acceptance forever. The universe will be unlocked.

    • @lukiepoole6701
      @lukiepoole6701 5 років тому

      @zezt zezter Nothing can be elaborated. To prove aether, free energy must be proved first.

    • @lukiepoole6701
      @lukiepoole6701 5 років тому +3

      @Cosmic Landscape Did I say energy existed from nothing? The energy is from the aether.
      There is entropy but there is ALSO negative entropy. Thermodynamics lied.

    • @briankumeroa5854
      @briankumeroa5854 4 роки тому

      Right on Rodney 😊

    • @ReaperOfTheSpirit
      @ReaperOfTheSpirit Рік тому

      ​@@lukiepoole6701 No you are lying weirdo..😂😂😂

  • @wesbaumguardner8829
    @wesbaumguardner8829 5 років тому +9

    The Michelson Morley experiment failed to detect an ether wind. The experiment was not designed to detect the ether. There is no known way to detect the ether itself. All electromagnetic phenomena, including light, are ether perturbations. We observe with ether perturbations and therefore cannot detect the ether. Can we use sound to detect air? Can we use sonar to detect water? No to both. The Michelson Morley experiment had a faulty premise.

    • @muntee33
      @muntee33 5 років тому +2

      Wes Baumguardner
      Not necessarily true. We don’t understand the mechanism for potential transition of energy. Who said it is composed of transverse EM style Wave Functions. The fact that Tesla demonstrated ‘Super Luminal’ velocities exist, one would assume the information transfer was carried out through this field. This field would obviously have different attributes to what we ate conceptually familiar with. Maybe this is where the golden ratio is manifests from, I feel Vortex based mathematics would be more applicable here.

    • @wesbaumguardner8829
      @wesbaumguardner8829 5 років тому +5

      @@muntee33 You would be surprised how much Tesla, Oliver Heaviside, Charles Proteus Steinmetz, and their contemporaries knew. There are several books written on the topic of the underlying principles and numerous equations regarding electromagnetic energy conversions. People pretend these books do not exist today. Electromagnetism requires an ether. Without it, there can be no causal relations between electromagnetic phenomena. However, as I said earlier, electromagnetic phenomena are all ether perturbations and thus cannot detect the ether itself because they consist of the ether. Trying to do so is much like trying to use water waves to prove water exists. There are two possible ways which superluminal speeds may be attained, contrary to relativism. The first, which I know Tesla used is longitudinal waves which propagate faster than the transverse waves of light because the initiating disturbance is in the same direction as the wave (whereas transverse waves have a 90 degree angle to the initiating disturbance.) The other is to have a time or space scalar. Either are possible in electromagnetic theory. Direct current electricity is a time scalar because it is nothing more than electrostatic pressure, much like water coming out of a hose as soon as the spigot is turned. Space scalars are much more complicated and information on them is difficult to acquire. It is quite possible Tesla used time or space scalars, but I have not found any information to confirm this.

    • @marcusanderson9042
      @marcusanderson9042 5 років тому

      The MM is the LIGO detector. The only problems were scale and layer upon layer, upon layer or error correction factors, like the Earth's own vibrations.

    • @cheeseburger625
      @cheeseburger625 7 місяців тому

      @@wesbaumguardner8829 what is the composition of Aether?

    • @wesbaumguardner8829
      @wesbaumguardner8829 7 місяців тому

      @@cheeseburger625 The aether has no composition as it is what comprises everything.

  • @Khwartz
    @Khwartz 2 роки тому +2

    So Glad to see that with probably Very Different Backgrounds, and with Different Approaches, we can come to the Very Same Conclusions 🙂

  • @danimal967
    @danimal967 4 роки тому +9

    Very well done explanation. Easy for everyone to follow.

  • @BuildingFaith2007
    @BuildingFaith2007 10 місяців тому +1

    Does anyone know what page Sir Isaac Newton said that the Aether was the medium for gravity in Principia?

    • @AETHERscience
      @AETHERscience 4 місяці тому

      It is at page 325 (query 21) of Newton's Opticks, 2nd Ed. , 1718.

  • @malectric
    @malectric 6 місяців тому +2

    From a non-physicist's naive view but that of someone who has practiced electronics for decades I've come to think that perhaps e.m. propagation through the "medium of space" shall we say, is expressed as transverse waves with electric and magnetic fields propagating at "right angles" in lockstep and gravitational waves are longitudinal. I sitll wonder.

  • @giles1322
    @giles1322 5 років тому +17

    Would make a lot more sense if you explained it before everything else

  • @RichardAlsenz
    @RichardAlsenz 4 роки тому +5

    My opinion, is the aether is the electric field. It is space which does not exist. Has anyone ever observed a point, line or circle? If your answer is yes, ask yourself was it a picture of a point I observed. One of Einstein's last published works admitted that space has no existence.

  • @curtiselmore727
    @curtiselmore727 Рік тому +3

    If there's no "aether", then what is gravity distorting

    • @EnergyWaveTheory
      @EnergyWaveTheory  Рік тому +2

      This video implies there is an aether. Gravity is distorting the aether.

    • @curtiselmore727
      @curtiselmore727 Рік тому

      We agree @@EnergyWaveTheory

  • @eu29lex16
    @eu29lex16 2 роки тому +4

    Light is basically just a vibration, it's not made of anything particle-like ! When you talk about "sound" you don't say that the sound is air, you say that sound is a vibrational Wave ! Same with light, light is a VIBRATION of something, as with all energy, light is the movement of something !
    But Einstein said light wasn't pure vibration/energy, he said that it was a particle, like water is a particle ! So, since he was saying that light is a particle, he started saying that light doesn't need a medium for movement ! Cuz LIGHT is it's OWN MEDIUM due to being a particle.
    But, if light were a particle, it would destroy our atmosphere in a small amount of time.
    I think you see the implications.
    Then, you may ask, if Light is a vibrational wave(and not a particle), like sound, then what does it use to travel in space ? Sound can't travel in waves in space cuz there is no air for it to travel on, so what does light use to travel as a wave ? Well, it's called ether .
    Also, in present times the ether is also called "quantum field"

  • @aloywong658
    @aloywong658 4 роки тому +25

    Came here from genshin impact and this is Aether huh, damn he powerful then any archon.

    • @unlikelysus6206
      @unlikelysus6206 3 роки тому +1

      Imagine his original power plus all elements plus an extra elements plus this aether

    • @UnknownGodOfCelestia
      @UnknownGodOfCelestia 3 роки тому

      @MrBeαst 🅥 Muji Muji Daruma

  • @acid2957
    @acid2957 3 роки тому +18

    "What is aether?"
    Genshin impact and minecraft:``Hello there,I'd like to introduce myself``

  • @freddyabreu3931
    @freddyabreu3931 6 місяців тому +1

    Hi,
    Do you have a pdf book about this?

    • @EnergyWaveTheory
      @EnergyWaveTheory  6 місяців тому +1

      A book on Amazon at www.amazon.com/Particles-Universe-Jeff-Yee/dp/1731583737

    • @freddyabreu3931
      @freddyabreu3931 6 місяців тому

      @@EnergyWaveTheory thanks man

  • @johnhodge6610
    @johnhodge6610 5 років тому +17

    Michelson-Morley DID detect an effect. It was below their pre-conceived value. Other similar experiments done by Dayton Miller did detect, also. Many other experiments also had a positive value.

  • @broderen6234
    @broderen6234 5 років тому +16

    This experiment does not fail to prove the aeter ! It proves that the earth is not moving. The assumption of the earth moving dictated the reading of the result

    • @ColeBeeRyan
      @ColeBeeRyan 5 років тому +5

      Maybe the aether is moving around us at a fixed velocity.

    • @jg4847
      @jg4847 4 роки тому +4

      In conclusion we live In a motionless plane.

    • @DriscolDevil
      @DriscolDevil 4 роки тому +1

      That makes no sense. Did you actually finish the video?

    • @daleg1679
      @daleg1679 4 місяці тому +1

      Exactly! The only way they 'prove' anything is with computer modeling, which isn't reality. Absolutely loved this video for reasons the maker never even considered.

  • @EnergyWaveTheory
    @EnergyWaveTheory  5 років тому +7

    A new paper detailing the structure of the aether (spacetime) and the unification of forces has been posted here: www.researchgate.net/publication/334316805

  • @TheZooman22
    @TheZooman22 Рік тому +2

    The speed of light is actually “the rate of induction “ in the ether or medium. If it is constant, and it seems to be , then a change in the rate of induction ( in the medium) would not be detected in this experiment. In much the same way that light doesn’t propagate faster when a laser is shot from a space ship, it remains the same.

  • @jamesbarrett3958
    @jamesbarrett3958 3 роки тому +3

    Aether is Photon. ‘’Light” is a specific frequency of energy moving through the Photon Field. The material world emerges from the flow of energy through the Photon Field.

  • @norman_sage2528
    @norman_sage2528 4 роки тому +11

    The discovery of the Higgs Field was the confirmation of the aether. The field of physics needs an enema.
    If that doesn't do it then how about the Casimir Effect?

    • @Sciurus
      @Sciurus 4 роки тому +5

      Physics is funded to help create competitive minds to bring into the military industrial complex for geopolitical advantages for those nations that fund them.
      Tsun Tzu says Military Science is essentially the Art of Deception. Combine that with the ancient mystery religions of the ancient world you can easily see why certain technologies that when developed which would lead to great geopolitical military advantages and intelligence capabilities, it seems almost clear as day why Thomas Townsend Brown's work is still classified and we constantly hear rumours of secret space programs using electrogravitics based technologies that essentially whirl up and push off the æther! Everyone from Walter Russell's periodic table and transmutation experiments to Thomas Henry Moray to Victor Shauberger to TT Brown to N Tesla himself! Makes you wonder how much Paracelsus knew with the great Gothic cathedrals being built essentially as giant vibrational laboratories with their monster sized brass pipe organs according to Fulcanelli! Commander Fravor's subordinate's infrared search and track video is a good example of this as you can see red and blue shift around the craft similar to the effects of seeing a magnet in a ferrocell!
      The real question is the material cost of building a working flying advanced electrogravitic propulsion system that influences the æther around the craft into lifting off and propelling itself with reliability and safety economically feasible for the average middle class person or is it as far out of reach as it would be to build a Saturn V rocket to take you to the moon. Something tells me if the technology was so inaccessible due to material constraints, it wouldnt need to be so well hidden under a mountain in the desert of Nevada surrounded by an off limits military base!

    • @Rubyllim
      @Rubyllim 3 роки тому +1

      @@Sciurus I don't wanna be "that guy" but who asked?

    • @Sciurus
      @Sciurus 3 роки тому +3

      @@Rubyllim dont worry I probably had it coming, I came out of the womb an asshole and have no plans to change my ways anytime soon!
      But you should have picked a post that wasnt 4 months old and isnt off topic if you really wanted to rip into me! 😅

    • @mrsbethaniesmith
      @mrsbethaniesmith 3 роки тому

      @@Rubyllim I like and agree with his original comment.

    • @Rubyllim
      @Rubyllim 3 роки тому

      @@Sciurus lmao I only got the notif when some other dude replied
      I really wasn't tryna rip into you chief, with all due respect o7

  • @sebastianstewart6894
    @sebastianstewart6894 Рік тому +2

    2:50 actually all travel through the lattice we call aether, it is literally the matrix of the universe.

  • @philoso377
    @philoso377 3 роки тому +2

    M&M didn’t understand light wave and Aether enough have committed to design and ran experiments with a negative results, as expected.
    All electromagnetic and light wave requires a medium (dielectric) to propagate. It is e0 in Maxwell’s equation. The instance we let air infiltrate the experiment then air becomes the medium and not Aether.
    Aether exists in absolute empty space with a measurable dielectric constant e0 of 8.8541817128 pF/meter. At this point of writing, Aether’s properties are not fully understood.
    We can’t insert jars of low pressure vessel as part of M&M’s apparatus on earth to validate the apparatus for Aether compliance because Aether in it moves as much as the jar moves. Unless the whole experiment is space far from any galaxies, spiral arm, molecular clouds or cosmic plasma to make result conclusive.
    Besides that Aether is a dielectric medium in the local space can be dragged along with the interferometer.

    • @cryptonein
      @cryptonein 3 роки тому

      See "The Dynamic Ether of Cosmic Space: Correcting a Major Error in Modern Science" by James DeMeo is a great book to clearly show what went wrong with science and history and how the aether drift was clearly detected. Also Ionel Dinu has some great papers on gravity and aether waves (aka electro-magnetic or radio waves).

    • @philoso377
      @philoso377 3 роки тому +1

      @@cryptonein
      Thank you for head up on valuable books.
      One UA-cam channel shows that M&M did report Aether drift. Michelson-Morley report this “we are 99.9% sure that the Earth’s velocity is between 6km/s and 10km/s”. While the absolute error is (30-8)=22km/s. On the other hand, the absolute error may be (8-0)km/s, leaving the theory of Relativity is only 1% correct.
      Drawn from my own observation, the claim of c in SR as universal constant (regardless of observer, source, relative location and velocity all will experience the same c), that contradicts Doppler’s equation for red shift. If Einstein’s SR is right on c then Hubble’s red shift is wrong, mutually exclusive.

    • @cryptonein
      @cryptonein 3 роки тому

      @@philoso377 definitely check out this book. The clear demonstration that the speed of light is not constant even by Michelson's later experiments that were corrupted by his "students" / "research assistants" is also extremely interesting. There are so many things that are important to recognize and understand that are entirely left out of our current context in order to hold up the sanctity of current (bad) paradigms.

  • @baolujiang9060
    @baolujiang9060 Рік тому +1

    In chemistry, we assume the electrons are arranged in different shells around the nucleus, not because that is the truth, but this model can help us to understand the common chemical process. If later one day we get the technology to take pictures of those electrons, we can improve on this model, or bring up a new model.
    When trying to explain light as a wave, there is no better way than assuming light has a medium. As for the Michelson-Morley experiment, it did not prove that aether does not exist, but only showed there is no relative motion between Aether and Earth. The length contraction is another explanation, but unless you can tell me why this contraction exactly cancelled out the relative motion between Aether and Earth, I won't take it seriously.

  • @jonbold
    @jonbold 6 місяців тому +2

    Yes, the Aether exists. We know a list of facts about it but not everything. We know that something about it moves at c, and since normal matter cannot move at c, therefore the aether cannot be made of normal matter. We think photons do not propel themselves, they simply energize the aether, locally. We think it lends wavelike properties to the EM radiation. The photon is the particle and the medium provides the wave. When light moves slower through a lens material, it is because the aether , energized by the EM, is passing through the lens material, creating a mixed medium. This also explains why the light speeds up again upon exiting the lens material. As in all other cases, the medium determines the speed of the wave. An undersea radio antenna needs to be shortened by the index of refraction of light (n=1.33) to work correctly. The Aether penetrates and saturates the entire Earth. I wonder what the index of refraction of the core of the Earth is? The aether penetrates and energizes the subatomic matter in every atom, forcing the subatomics to maintain c. As the subatomics are captivated in the construct of normal matter, the subatomics are constantly accelerating in essentially every direction at once. Gravity? Any change in c causes a net acceleration amongst the subatomics, which translates to a force in the normal matter. Gravity is that simple. No matter how fast matter is moving, the subatomics are moving at exactly c, relative to the Aether, the medium of the galaxy. Thus, no speck of normal baryonic matter will ever move faster than c unless we can locally energize c and motivate it in the right vector. C is whatever speed the aether is moving. The aether moves in all directions at once as a superfluid. It is not captive and not accelerating. The speed of the aether is dependent on its energy to matter ratio. The aether slows as it nears great quantities of normal matter because it is rendering energy into that matter. This slowing causes gradients of time dilation, which cause the gravity mentioned earlier. Light, crossing a gradient will curve. the waves that stay in phase will curve. The non-accelerating aether interacts with with the subatomic to which it is rendering energy, not in a chemical way, in a physical way. Equivalence is constant. Mass is normal matter's resistance to acceleration, as produced by the same mechanics as gravity mentioned earlier, but with kinetic input instead of a chronic input. Thanks for a great explainer video.

    • @JoeDeglman
      @JoeDeglman 4 місяці тому +1

      The same equation used by the MMX and Miller can be used by GPS experiments to determine the GPS satellites velocities wrt the Earth's magnetic field. Using an anisotropic speed of light.
      GPS experiments indicate that there IS an anisotropic speed of light due to the motion of the satellite wrt the magnetic field, in contradiction of the Einstein model or relativity but in support of Lorentz relativity.
      Geostationary satellites do not register a variance in the speed of light but moving GPS satellites do.
      So because there is no ether drift for geostationary experiments like MMX and Miller they used the wrong equation for the experiment. Their equation assumed an aether drift.
      Like a radio telescope that can detect an anisotropy of energy from the solar wind, had they used the superposition of waves equation in the experiment they would have computed an Earth orbital velocity or 30km/ sec instead of 7.5 km/sec.
      The interferometer experiments actually confirm something completely different than an ether drift. Like detecting what direction a sound is coming from.

    • @CaptainJack351
      @CaptainJack351 Місяць тому

      ​@@JoeDeglman . @Jonbold suggests that the aether powers sub atomic particles which I have also hypothesised for some time. I noted that the MMX was done with the apparatus measuring with respect to a parallel situation with earth's surface. I hypothesise that if the aether is powering subatomic particles then a large body of mass like the earth might be damn hungry for it and that the aether is hence flowing directly into the earth. So I find the GPS observations very interesting.
      This flow of aether directly into the earth giving rise to a friction effect on all objects in its path as all objects contain subatomic particles and hence absorb some of the flowing aether and hence the change in velocity of the aether causing the effect of gravity. So might the measurement of weight vs mass be a direct measurement of the flow of aether?
      One can also imagine that two giant bodies in space rotating around each other do so because they are fighting over the available aether in the local vicinity of which, because of it's restricted access between the two bodies, might exhibit a lower field density? A vacuum effect? And at a micro scale, a subatomic particle of mass being like a space vacuum cleaner, so that subatomic particles of mass effectively suck themselves together like two individual vacuum cleaner nozzles. Might this explain the strong nuclear force? That the subatomic particles that absorb the aether effectively suck the hardest? And that as multi particle structures develop, there is a tendency for the structures to inhibit the flow of either into such subatomic particles and hence the weaker outlying vacuum forces we observe? Also the necessity for toroidal pathways to form within the structures being the most efficient pathways for the aether to supply subatomic particles. One can only imagine that at the macro scale, the vacuum force between the two bodies of a quasar might approach the vacuum force of subatomic particles?
      So why the spin? If we imagine the low field pressure between two bodies of mass, and we imagine that this low field pressure is being fed by non local either from the plane perpendicular to the axis that passes through the centre of the two masses, then it's likely there will be an increase in field velocity in the vicinity of this plane. And might it then be in the best interest of each mass to move toward that higher velocity of the field to garner an increase in supply? Also that there may be an optimal rotational velocity whereby excess rotational velocity might defeat the benefit of the increased supply effect? A self tuning process that may explain why solar systems don't seem to decay or fly apart? And that why particles are mostly stable? It seems all rotational systems either decay, stabilise or blow apart. But of those that reach equilibrium, what do we know? That the energy going in equals the energy going out? So is the aether a form of energy? Some speculate that it is a form of consciousness.
      But if we speculate that there is a field and that it has changing density or changing field pressure, what happens when the field is exhausted? Meaning no existence whatsoever? Is this what we refer to as dark energy? The inability of light to pass? Such as sound not passing through a vacuum? The un-existence of the medium?
      According to the double split experiment, particles act in accordance of the concept of probability. So might it be that the aether field is a field of probability? And I speculate that the field of probability is a dynamic entity, meaning that regions of dense either exist because the probability of existence in that region is high. Meaning that existence affects the probability of existence. What!!!?? But if this were the case then might regions between large bodies of matter where the aether density is reduced, be hotbed regions for the new supply of existence itself? Materialisation of the field itself and so negate the vacuum effect between such large bodies of matter? And it seems like here we are at the gates of Yin and Yang. The proverbial cat chasing its tail.
      I also speculate here about time. That time is a velocity change not in relation to matter but in relation to the field of aether. Such that where aether flows the fastest, like at the earth's surface, there can be a greater velocity of change. So it appears there is a relationship between gravity and time, but effectively time, like gravity is a resistance to the flow of aether. Aether being based in probability. In such that if we proceeded away from the mass of the earth then gradually the flow of aether would lessen but its density would increase, maybe in a similar way to how we see compressible fluid dynamics. So possibly a small object relatively stationary to the aether field in deep space and that which only causes a very weak inflow of aether might experience time much more slowly than that of the surface of the earth, but a small body of mass at a high velocity relative to the aether field eg. a propelled space ship at a high percentage velocity of the speed of light might experience a faster rate of time relative to the earth's surface. It's difficult to speculate on the velocity of the aether at the earth's surface. I don't think we can measure it against the speed of light. Because light is relative to the aether. It's like saying, measure the speed of a wave in a river that's flowing. Or more specifically the hull speed of a boat travelling in a flowing river relative to the shore. It's just useless information. Especially if the flow rate of the river is the rate of time itself.
      Ok then..... so why do satellites stay in orbit? Well according to Einstein it's because of the time gradient that the satellite travels in. Meaning the top of the satellite is in a faster time altitude than the bottom of the satellite so the satellite follows the curve of space time.
      But what is causing the time gradient? Might it be a gradient in the aether field density? Meaning that the closer you get to the earth's surface, the faster the flow of the field and the less dense the field becomes? So a satellite would then indeed be traveling in a time gradient, but that gradient is governed by the field density gradient. If this were correct, then it's likely the velocity of the satellite might exceed the velocity of the flow of aether toward the earth at that altitude? I would love to be able to do the mathematics on this speculation.
      Might it be that the aether field behaves like a field of treacle in as far as it sticks to itself and resists the tendency to tear open into nothingness. Images of the langoliers come to mind.
      As a final note on todays ramblings consider how we escape the earth's surface. We build a boat that can travel faster than the downward flow of the river of either. The boat must have a low enough resistance to the friction of aether (low enough mass) and high enough opposing force to be able exceed the aether's downward velocity. But hang on!!? If satellites are riding the curve of space time due to the density gradient of the aether field, which is it? What is holding us on the surface? Are we held to the surface by a downward river or aether or are we held down because we are in a space time gradient? Can it be both?!?!
      Consider a shallow but wide funnel with a flow of water that causes an initially slow but then an increasing rotation of water towards the central drain. Consider a rubber duck in a slow orbit around the drain. What are the forces involved? The mass of the duck resists the change in direction because the time gradient is in the vertical not the horizontal. The gradual inward flow of the water acts as a friction on the duck. And the very slight gradient in the water causes the duck to slide downhill toward the centre due to the vertical time gradient. Is it possible at some point that all three forces will cause orbital equilibrium? Meaning that gravity might not just be one force?

  • @branchingvine
    @branchingvine 6 років тому +8

    The Aether does exist, and the Nicholson/Morley experiments were not failures. What they demonstrated is the fact the earth is not rotating, and is in fact stationary. It is not moving at all, just as our senses tell us.

    • @strad404
      @strad404 5 років тому

      interesting, so what do you believe?

    • @xdmilos1
      @xdmilos1 5 років тому +1

      @@strad404 He is Flat Earther probably lol.
      Thise Ether theory is pushed by conspiracy theorists, religious people and people who have zero knowledge about physics, that tells you all about theory..

    • @strad404
      @strad404 5 років тому +3

      ste1fan1 nice use of a logical fallacy. for someone who says they care about science and facts, I'm surprised.

  • @libertykrueger1433
    @libertykrueger1433 3 роки тому +2

    What isn’t considered in the question of an aether is that the pulsing motion of atomic nuclei generate varying densities of aether to form a concentric series of spherical, constructive standing waves extending from each nuclei outward in all directions. These spherical standing waves of aether act as the structure of matter. Since aether is continually being resorted into these material structures by each nuclei in existence more than nine billion times every second, it’s not hard to see why an apparatus, itself constructed of pulsing atoms, would have simply reordered the aether it was passing through into and around each of these atoms many times faster than the earths progression through the universe. The Michelson Morley experiment would have shown nothing.

    • @EnergyWaveTheory
      @EnergyWaveTheory  3 роки тому

      Well said...

    • @cryptonein
      @cryptonein 3 роки тому +1

      See "The Dynamic Ether of Cosmic Space: Correcting a Major Error in Modern Science" by James DeMeo is a great book to clearly show what went wrong with science and history and how the aether drift was clearly detected. Also Ionel Dinu has some great papers on gravity and aether waves (aka electro-magnetic or radio waves).

  • @BrandyJoyTV
    @BrandyJoyTV 4 роки тому +8

    Thank you! This is a brilliant presentation on this subject. I have been hearing people theorize that dark matter is the aether. I'd love to hear your thoughts on this. I am going to go through your videos to find information on that theory. Thanks again!

    • @EnergyWaveTheory
      @EnergyWaveTheory  4 роки тому +5

      I think dark matter will need to be more than just aether itself. Possibly neutrally charged particles that still interact with gravity but are not detected with electromagnetic apparatus.

    • @BrandyJoyTV
      @BrandyJoyTV 4 роки тому +3

      Energy Wave Theory thank you so much for the quick reply! This makes sense. I’ve been watching your videos on dark matter and dark energy this afternoon. I do energetic work like Qigong, energy rituals, and yogic exercises that increase energy and I’m trying to understand it from a more scientific perspective. If you have any theories, I’d love to see a video on the idea of energy work and what’s really going on. Thank you for your videos. I’m sharing the one on aether with my class. 🙏

    • @EnergyWaveTheory
      @EnergyWaveTheory  4 роки тому +2

      @@BrandyJoyTV There is a video on energy at ua-cam.com/video/fot957d5sTk/v-deo.html, but I think it is probably explaining it at a lower-level than perhaps you might want to explain energy within people. But I'll try to make a connection if that's helpful. Everything truly can be described as energy and there is a simple law in physics that energy is always conserved. It transfers forms. So, for example, my body needs energy for me to move, or think, or for the internal processes that are going on inside me even if I'm motionless. This comes from stored energy of foods we eat where the chemical processes in our bodies are essentially re-arranging atoms and molecules to release the energy. That stored energy in foods like plants, comes from the Sun and its light (photons) which carry energy and absorbed by plants in the photosynthesis process. I could go on about how the Sun creates photons from gravitational energy, but hopefully the point is already illustrated that everything is a conservation of energy that transfers forms.

    • @ajitkumar1579
      @ajitkumar1579 3 роки тому +2

      @brandy there is metaphysical dark matter of philosophy ..which matches exactly with notion of aether....what scientist call as dark matter could be totally different thing which i don't know

    • @elijahbachrach6579
      @elijahbachrach6579 3 роки тому +3

      The similarity I see between aether and dark matter, is the way that both models came about. Nobody began by observing aether or dark matter and then went on to ask the question, “what is this thing?” Instead, what was observed in either case were certain troubling phenomena which the existing physical models didn’t account for. Aether and dark matter are then brought in to plug the gaps. I’m not sure how the dark matter question will turn out, but it’s safe to say that we’re in for a major overhaul if we finally fail to observe it.

  • @eu29lex16
    @eu29lex16 2 роки тому +2

    6:06
    Yeah, like I said, if the aether particles exist(they must exist) then they are exactly what PHOTONS are, but without any energy/charge to them ! The photon wave/particle duality can be better explained if you are saying that the aether is a massive field of particles, which have the same properties of photons, but are mostly still and have no significant energy by themselves.
    Also, I think that you can make any types of matter from these particles and it respects the principle of conservation because you are NOT creating new particles, you are just using the aetherial ones which ALWAYS existed.
    And matter is a dense structure of aether particles, which is why light travels slower through matter than through space, it's cuz it has more aether particles through which is has to pass ! Also, these aether particles can retain/grab/attract energy for a SMALL time, and the MORE OF these aether particles you have in one point of space, the more TIME is required for energy/light to pass ! And then, when energy is RELEASED into the AETHER/Field, from the matter particles, the aether particles become VISIBLE under the FORM of PHOTONS which retain/grab/attract energy much faster than atomic particles, due to being fewer particles into point of space, so energy will AGAIN require LESS time to travel.
    But, because these aether particles also require TIME to retain/grab/attract energy, they give what we see as "light" a finite speed .
    So, unlike the current wide-accepted theory of the Genesus of the Cosmos, the aether/field theory of still photon-like particles respects the principle of conservation when it comes to matter, cuz you are NOT creating something new out of the void, you are actually making use of PARTICLES which always existed in a aetherial&field still state. And these particles have the SAME properties as PHOTONS but they have no significant energy by themselves, they are mostly just a medium! And, unlike what they think about photons they DO "disappear", but not into the void, the photons go back into the STILL state of the aether particles when it/s energy touches an atom.

  • @internetexpert8153
    @internetexpert8153 3 роки тому +6

    I'm reading think and grow rich and the ether is mentioned many times

  • @joshbonnefin1732
    @joshbonnefin1732 8 місяців тому +1

    Why can't the aether just be another name for the 'medium' of spacetime? e.g spacetime curves around large mass, and electromagnetic waves follow this curvature of the spacetime. So the Michelson-Morley experiment had the wrong assumption that aether was moving in a different direction to earths movement. Perhaps aether is so hard to detect because we are all a part of it...

    • @EnergyWaveTheory
      @EnergyWaveTheory  8 місяців тому +1

      I think you have it correct on both fronts. 1) terminology... it's just another name for spacetime and 2) one of the reasons it is hard to detect is that we are a part of it (matter is made of the same aether material).

    • @joshbonnefin1732
      @joshbonnefin1732 8 місяців тому +1

      @@EnergyWaveTheory
      could radiowaves be used to manipulate space time in any significant way? Also, have you considered the Aharanov-Bohm effect? How might the electromagnetic four-potential play into your theory? I'd love to see you in a long form conversation with someone like Kurt Jaimungal.

    • @EnergyWaveTheory
      @EnergyWaveTheory  8 місяців тому +1

      @@joshbonnefin1732 could radio waves be used to manipulate spacetime? If a) spacetime is the medium for electric and magnetic waves to travel, and b) radio waves are a specific frequency of transverse electromagnetic waves, and c) matter is standing, longitudinal waves, then I would suggest that radio waves can influence matter or other EM waves, but not spacetime. Spacetime is the medium for waves to travel, but any of the waves within spacetime could affect each other. For example, radio waves can cause motion of matter (electrons in an antenna).
      I have not considered the Aharanov-Bohm effect. But as a variation of the double slit experiment, I think the double slit needs to be explained first. I did a write up on this experiment and how it fits within a wave structure of matter theory in which electrons are waves themselves and how it affects their motion: energywavetheory.com/explanations/double-slit-experiment/

  • @tracyrichardson3010
    @tracyrichardson3010 4 роки тому +5

    Stwven B Bryant's "Disruptive" is a must read. He shows that Michelsen-Morley DID detect the aether. The result was 7 km/s which in not zero. There was a calculation error in the data conversion. When adjusted the result was 34 km/s when the prediction was 33 km/s. There has to be an aether. Exactly the conclusion of the video even if MMX was not fully understood. The fact that MMX is understood should end the discussion.

    • @EnergyWaveTheory
      @EnergyWaveTheory  4 роки тому

      Thanks for the clarification Tracy!

    • @csaitruthorg393
      @csaitruthorg393 4 роки тому

      Einstein in his 1920 lecture has stated that space without ether is unthinkable for then space would not possess any physical qualities when in reality it possesses numerous qualities. The Michelson-Morley experiment failed to detect ether because it is present from above the KARMAN LINE i.e. outer space. To know about the various physical qualities of space and irrefutable presence of ether in outer space you must watch the video in my you tube link. ua-cam.com/video/kFSemmlKOb8/v-deo.html Please subscribe and share our channel so that more and more people become aware of the truth.

  • @philoso377
    @philoso377 8 місяців тому

    The answer on page 3:28 is
    That Aether adheres to all matter in the near field drag with equal speed with the test equipment, however Aether speed lag behind the object at a departure distance by a scale of 1/r until it approaches to the second nearest one.

  • @youtoober2013
    @youtoober2013 4 роки тому +1

    4:33
    Are you saying that we would need the universe to stop relative to itself in order to detect an either?

    • @EnergyWaveTheory
      @EnergyWaveTheory  4 роки тому

      At that point in the video, the reference is the Earth stopping relative to its motion in the universe. Trying to consider possible explanations for the length contraction of the interferometer.

  • @vahagnmelikyan2906
    @vahagnmelikyan2906 6 років тому +12

    Maybe Michelson experiment failed to detect aether, because earth is at zero motion relative to aether. In other words earth is not moving

    • @GAMESTERVISION
      @GAMESTERVISION 6 років тому +5

      Or they are moving at the same time.

    • @muntee33
      @muntee33 5 років тому

      Brrr... sorry timmy. Wrong

    • @lukiepoole6701
      @lukiepoole6701 5 років тому +2

      The earth IS moving. The aether is the one that is not moving.

    • @lukiepoole6701
      @lukiepoole6701 5 років тому +2

      @@jesusisking1-v6v You are wrong. Enough with the old "Earth as the center of the universe" misconception.

    • @lukiepoole6701
      @lukiepoole6701 5 років тому +2

      @@TheCellCreator That's just the dielectric inertial plane, aka accretion disk of the universe. The universe is a mega magnet having mega magnetic field and accretion disk/DIP.
      All those "good and evil" crap gives me headache when one can be good at being evil. Religion teaches fake shits.
      The REAL opposite of evil is *kind* . Kind vs evil. However kind failed. That's why kind be fierce. Fierce kind vs pure evil. Fierce kind win.

  • @ElizabethRussell144
    @ElizabethRussell144 Рік тому

    Can anyone tell me what is the similarity / difference relationship between Aether, chi, shakti, Hawaiian mana, the Holy Spirit, etc.?

  • @epictweegirl7
    @epictweegirl7 5 років тому +45

    no it’s a minecraft portal

  • @Obsidian_Dad
    @Obsidian_Dad Рік тому +1

    I believe the reason science is getting no where with string theory is the work of Dayton Miller was thrown away.

  • @SuperKnowledge4You
    @SuperKnowledge4You 5 років тому +19

    Thank you for the history. Interesting, I did not know all of that history. However, you have one part of the history in error, which understanding may help you immensely: originally, the Michelson/Morley experiment was to determine if the aether drifted with the earth, or if the earth drifted through it. After all if it is indeed responsible for Gravity (Isaac Newton), it must follow the earth a bit, stuck with the larger pieces yet still invisibly small pieces. The detection of no drifting through it was thought to answer this original question. Only later did some people start believing that this somehow proved no aether. I still can't find the reason why people stopped believing in aether! But they always point to that experiment, not realizing that, that very experiment proves the aether. For if the particles of the aether were not real, like everything else, then yes they would be unaffected by the sun and the earth, but no, these particles are real and are effected by the earth's gravity (and are responsible for it) just like everything else. The aether is everything else = just really fine dust. For more info, check out my videos (the production quality is just me, but the understanding is complete).

    • @lukabc31
      @lukabc31 5 років тому +4

      I suppose that aether is fabric of space and it does not travel with matter.. And what they proved is that aether does not travel correct?
      But tell me, did not they prove aether with Higg's particle? They say particles have mass thanx to Higg's field. Which is all around us.. Well, they clearly speak of aether, do not they?

    • @marcusanderson9042
      @marcusanderson9042 5 років тому +1

      ​@@lukabc31 The LIGO detection of gravity waves would be more of a proof than the Higgs since that still talks about mass. Question is how does light propagate as a wave through an empty medium? You need something to carry the wave, hence the ether or Luminous Aether.

    • @lukabc31
      @lukabc31 5 років тому +1

      @@marcusanderson9042 the wave or series of waves we call light is a feature of ether. It is not somehting separate, without ether light cannot exist.

    • @92587wayne
      @92587wayne 4 роки тому

      The Aether does not travel, the Primary particle is not readily apparent, is not measurable as to location and momentum in Space-Time. The primary particle is an omnipresent Infinitely Finite Indivisible Singular Particle that is not readily apparent, has no relative, numerical value, that has a numerical value of Zero-0 that exists within the omniscience of Space-Time, the Great Void.

    • @92587wayne
      @92587wayne 4 роки тому

      The existence or non-existence of the Aether particles is uncertain, Aether particles have no mass, are not readily apparent are not relative and have no numerical value,, have a numerical value of Zero--0. A Singularity of Zero-0 does not exist until it is reborn a Singularity of One-1, issues forth into the Light at the Event Horizon as the Reality of First Cause.

  • @Frost-bs6xr
    @Frost-bs6xr 4 роки тому +4

    It’s what existed so long ago with the keepers until they became corrupted in agartha

  • @dawnkinateder9617
    @dawnkinateder9617 24 дні тому

    "On the aethers" is how information traveled nearly instantaneous in the 80's before cell phones or the internet. I promise. What a time to be alive. Technology has destroyed everything good.

  • @cosmosaic8117
    @cosmosaic8117 2 роки тому +11

    I believe that Aether = Nonlocal Cosmic Consciousness and that the reason we can’t detect an Aether is because we also do not understand what Consciousness is and when we are looking for Aether, we are unknowingly looking for Consciousness.

    • @nightfears3005
      @nightfears3005 Рік тому +1

      Gibberish. You might as well say aether = jabberwocky.

    • @sshreddderr9409
      @sshreddderr9409 7 місяців тому +2

      I think consciousness is a sense of quality that is certainly carried by eather. it is not to be found inside the brain or its material, instead is a quality of the electromagnetic and gravitational field of and around the body . electricity also flows around the wire in the form of a traveling interacting field, trying to locate electricity inside the wire fails because despite detecting flow, the global energy inside the wire is still zero, and the fields around the wire are actually whats carrying the energy or electromagnetic fluid density that turns on the light on the other end

    • @cosmosaic8117
      @cosmosaic8117 7 місяців тому

      @@sshreddderr9409 Thanks for the response. Gives me some things to think about on my way to the library tomorrow

    • @Srelus
      @Srelus 3 місяці тому

      Ether was discovered through the experiments of Dayton Miller and several decades later by the U.S. Air Force in 1986.

    • @istrumguitars
      @istrumguitars Місяць тому

      Real scientific theory you got there bro

  • @itonylee1
    @itonylee1 4 роки тому +2

    It maybe easier to accept a wave like energy can be transmitted without medium. Newton taught us gravitational force but Einstein told us gravity is just an illusion of time and space. Nothing is certain, only what is the best for that era.

    • @ZackWolfMusic
      @ZackWolfMusic 4 роки тому

      Gravity is a lie so is time and space!

  • @CopingWithExistence
    @CopingWithExistence 6 місяців тому

    I started my youtube channel today thanks to videos like yours

  • @ThisUnifiedField
    @ThisUnifiedField Рік тому +5

    Nice video! Modern knowledge seems to not have caught up to ancient wisdom which states Aether is the medium which allows all matter to come into existence. What if Aether is what we are currently calling Dark Matter🤓? Perhaps our unrefined tools and biological instruments, which are made of or mostly enclosed within gross matter, cannot detect subtle matter and there lies the crux of the problem?

    • @EnergyWaveTheory
      @EnergyWaveTheory  Рік тому +1

      Yes! It is likely the problem that makes it hard to detect an aether. If aether gives rise to matter, and our instruments to detect the aether are made of matter, then it's difficult to detect or measure it.

  • @xennojeremy
    @xennojeremy 4 роки тому +1

    This is rather simple.
    The Michelson/Morley experiment failed to detect the Earth's magnetic field, which is a strong force, blocking a weak force (aether wind).
    When you spin an interferometer horizontal (side/side), you won't get a phase differential, but if yku spin it vertically (up/down), you get a phase differential, due to the EM pressure of the Earth's magnetic field.

  • @JohhnyJo-t1o
    @JohhnyJo-t1o 5 місяців тому

    Was tryna find vids about the Minecraft Aether but stumbled upon this can’t say I’m disappointed though very interesting to hear about this for the first time

  • @christinaggraham79
    @christinaggraham79 6 років тому +2

    Ok forgive me for not understanding, but if the “aether” is a substance that was theorized to exist outside of earth’s atmosphere and moved celestial bodies how can we test it IN earth’s “atmosphere” from the surface of earth?

    • @JeffYee
      @JeffYee 6 років тому

      Aether should be a substance everywhere, both inside and outside of Earth's atmosphere. But your question is valid. How can it be tested from Earth? Previous tests failed to detect the aether, which is why we are in stuck in a position where many physicists do not believe that it exists.

    • @christinaggraham79
      @christinaggraham79 6 років тому

      Jeff Yee when I look up the origin of of this word “aether”, it originates from the Greek meaning “air/wind”. And air/wind is on the earth, of course, but did the early scientists believe that air/wind existed between the sun/planets and earth in the heliocentric system?
      Sorry, I’m having a hard time understanding what the scientific definition of “aether” is.

    • @christinaggraham79
      @christinaggraham79 6 років тому

      Jeff Yee also..in addition, I have to bring up the Michelson and Morley experiments. It is said the experiment “failed to detect the aether”.
      My question to this is “how”?
      I thought the experiment was set up to detect changes in paths of light on longitudinal/latitudinal arms of an apparatus with, allegedly, the arm facing the direction of earth’s rotation being slowed down? If that is true then they failed to detect earth’s MOTION.
      And if the excuse is that the steel arm of the apparatus “contracting” (later called Lorentz contraction) then that means, hypothetically, the experiment DID detect the “aether” but that the arm of the apparatus “contracted” causing the results to be exactly the same as the result would be from earth’s motion? That’s one hell of a coincidence in results and seems contradictory. Either there was this “aether” and “Lorentz contraction” caused the results to be “null” or there is no “aether” and Lorentz contraction is bogus. Or..many other things like, for instance, maybe the earth doesn’t move. There is just too many ways to begin thinking to determine the results.

    • @JeffYee
      @JeffYee 6 років тому +1

      @@christinaggraham79 It's a word used from Greek times, but their original concept of it would have been very different given the limited resources they had centuries ago. The strongest argument that I have for a universal substance that allows electromagnetic waves to travel (an aether) is from calculations. Everything in the EWT model comes from a base equation for waves, including a density property. It's my belief that this density is the "substance", i.e. aether. Note that particle energies and all forces (except the weak force) have been derived from the equation, so it's a necessity in the equations. See energywavetheory.com/equations/.
      The challenge is now to explain the M-M experiment, and others, that show a null result of the aether. There could be different explanations for it. I favor the Lorentz explanation, but there could be another valid explanation too. Here's a page that Gabriel LaFreniere wrote on the Lorentz transformation and aether that you might find interesting: www.rhythmodynamics.com/Gabriel_LaFreniere/sa_Lorentz.htm

    • @christinaggraham79
      @christinaggraham79 6 років тому

      Jeff Yee could you tell me what you know as far as empirical evidence of the Lorentz contraction/expansion? I couldn’t find anything as far as how they proved that when digging into what was written during that time

  • @mrsbethaniesmith
    @mrsbethaniesmith 3 роки тому +2

    I enjoyed your presentation and was able to follow along. Thank you!

  • @danieljust295
    @danieljust295 6 років тому +2

    Hooke, Galileo, Descartes, Huygens already described fundamental lows of mechanics which assumed the existence of the aether. Newton took over Hooke’s work and removed aether from the equations because he didn’t understand its necessity. In fact, it was Abraham Yahuda who spread Newton’s papers after his death. The lack of aether in Newton’s law caused countless paradoxes in current physics: lack of description of rotation movement in Newton’s law (although all rotates in heliocentric system), inertia in vacuum is caused by unknown forces, photon has weight but not mass, the nature of gravitational force is unknown, the direction of gravitational force is different than central force of more than two bodies with mass are considered, gravitation must act faster than speed of light (must be instantaneous - so called “spooky actions on distance”) . Einstein was well aware of it. The removal of the aether lead to quantum physics and eventually to experiments in which observer changes the result of the experiment - and this is not science anymore but metaphysics. The brainwashed society is unable to understand anymore that specific shape of motionless object is able to disturb (or change the pressure ) of the aether becoming aether resonator generating electric energy (as the result of the causes disturbance).
    Hint: Waves moves faster the denser is the medium. In vacuum e-m wave moves the fastest, conclusion ? Yes, aether is extremely dense (see Planck constant) and all objects with mass are less denser, yet we can easily move through it. Paradox ? Imagine a bubble in the water.

    • @ajitkumar1579
      @ajitkumar1579 3 роки тому

      You've provided me plenty of gems...i am following their trace.. but waves move faster in less dense (subtle) mediums..just compare sound wave and water

    • @Wolffanghurricane
      @Wolffanghurricane 2 роки тому

      @@ajitkumar1579 I think sound waves differ from energy waves like electric or light, in that while they're all called waved sound waves are vibrations while energy/light waves is a form of energy itself moving through/past other mediums. For example sound waves travel worse the denser the medium, and in space where currently perceive nothing but are hypothesizing the aether exists, sound cannot travel at all. Keeping the logic that aether particles are extremely dense true

  • @MichaelJohnson-jt5cu
    @MichaelJohnson-jt5cu 3 роки тому +2

    You forgot about about Tesla, Maxwell, Steinmetz and Heavyside all believed there is an aether, makes more sense than atomist theories.

  • @victor7574
    @victor7574 Рік тому

    The Michelson Morley interferometer experiments disproved the existence of a stationary aether, something which coincides with Newton's concept of absolute space. However, their work did not rule out an aether that is in motion.

  • @leroyjenkins2647
    @leroyjenkins2647 Рік тому +1

    Ok but from what I’ve read Aether was on the periodic table until about 1908, how did Aether make it on to the periodic table if its existence was never proven?

    • @EnergyWaveTheory
      @EnergyWaveTheory  Рік тому

      Mendeleev built the first version of the Periodic Table in 1869 and the M-M experiment on the aether was not until 1887. Aether was accepted at the time he built the first version of the Periodic Table and furthermore it was a prediction of elements (a lot of things on the table were not proven at that point).

  • @mundymorningreport3137
    @mundymorningreport3137 4 роки тому +4

    This simply does not add up. Aether as a medium for waves is consistant with all physical phenomenon we experience, yet, no scientist (except Nikola Tesla could figure out how the Aether could work with electricity, even doing experiments that proved electricity was more than chargeed partiles.. So, lacking the imagination to conceive of how Aether could be there, they instead decide waves can travel without a medium ( by magic).
    And everyone agreed. Why? Not because it makes sense, but because, when Tesla proved it was there and that he could manipulate the Ether to do what matter was doing, he took matter out of the equation of all industrial systems which would devalue the wealth of anyone invested in a monopoly of any commodity; also put the value of any commodity at risk, a quickly made Ether wave (for free) could replace that commodity... So, for a few dollars and control of untold billions of people, Ether was rejected. Mankind did not need free, clean energy and endless abundance for billions of lives on the planet, so keep on keeping on polluting the planet and exhausting the natural resources and destroying the natural beauty and eliminating the diversity of life... Well, at least we kept the wealthyest industrialists in power and protected their wealth. party on dudes, be good to each other.

    • @EnergyWaveTheory
      @EnergyWaveTheory  4 роки тому

      Solar is a good example of clean energy which can be harnessed, yet companies have figured out a way to capitalize on it for revenue by selling the hardware that collects this energy. My point is that the two can coexist. Solar is certain frequencies (light) of electromagnetic waves traveling from the Sun to the Earth. To your point, waves should travel in a medium (aether). We just can't see it, nor understand it, so it was concluded that it doesn't exist. Once we do have a better grasp of it, I believe we'll have many more practical applications that can harness energy.

  • @lilflipsta2385
    @lilflipsta2385 5 років тому +4

    What about the experiment Morley did with the splitter being on a turn table...... produce all the fact next time.....

    • @muntee33
      @muntee33 5 років тому +1

      Lilflip Sta
      So does magnetic torque play a role?

  • @patrickday4206
    @patrickday4206 2 роки тому +2

    It's funny how in physics they avoided the aether and yet proposed similar concepts dark matter and string theory! I think Einstein was partially right about things moving very fast and how they become pure energy things like light that move fast interact with something that seems out of phase from matter! It makes me wonder if everything is energy and the matter that we interact with is traveling slower creating voids where it exists and the energy creates a repulsion field which means empty space has more energy than matter which makes planets mostly made of empty space!

  • @jacobthomas3201
    @jacobthomas3201 6 років тому +12

    Yes aether absorbs and carries thought therefore manifesting and recording

    • @johnnyaingel5753
      @johnnyaingel5753 5 років тому +5

      TRUTH it is the RECORDING ANGEL nothing escapes it

    • @LionofLight777
      @LionofLight777 5 років тому +3

      Indeed!...Many people's thoughts are pulling from the same sea of Aether. That Aether is like a majestic pool of Light that is poured out like Water, quenching both,the curiosity and the minds of thirsty Men,by filling their imaginations up with marvelous epiphanies and surrounding them with the magnificent Light of serendipity!.....That's all.....Shalom

    • @cyberspice4401
      @cyberspice4401 4 роки тому

      Esoteric name of 5th element is Eather..in other cultures that is Akasha,Dragon pearl,Chi,Chintamani,Zohar,Mercaba,Soul,Holy spirit...!
      Corse when are all elements in balans and in rightchesnes,in truth,with out violence,in peace..that is love..godes part of evrithin..
      Dharma!
      🙏🙏🙏

  • @Hydroverse
    @Hydroverse 10 місяців тому

    If the aether does exist, then it has to have exotic properties to explain the speed of light and the amplitude of said waves being visible light years away (this is nothing like sound propagating through particles).
    Of course, if matter is light's source, then matter must be an alternative form of energy in said aether. The only alternative form of energy in addition to waves would be rotational fields.
    Of course, this would reveal more about aether because the size of those vortexes is small, which when coupled with their stability seems to suggest a lack of drag.
    Furthermore, if aether is just a featureless ocean out of which particles exist, then it would be improper to describe it as having things like temperature and viscosity because those emerge from particles interacting.
    This makes predicting the aether very difficult because it would be rash to assert that it would behave anything like sound moves through air.
    This leaves the door open for aether to exist if the presence of particles influences the aether to exist in discrete amounts that move in synchronization with particles. Meaning, there would be no relative motion between Earth and aether. It'd be like trying to measure the speed of an airplane or a car by sound interference where the temperature and pressure is constant.

  • @johnhodge6610
    @johnhodge6610 5 років тому +8

    It was Fitzgerald not Lorentz whosuggested length contraction. Boy, this video really has some big problems.

  • @trysilspiste5058
    @trysilspiste5058 5 років тому +4

    They have detected aether rotation around Earth surface about 1666 km/h. It was Michelson-Gale 1925 and Sagnac 1913 (Sagnac effect). M&M tried to detect 30km/sec speed of revolved Earth, but get only 3-4 km/sec speed of aether.

  • @HeadLxck
    @HeadLxck 6 років тому +3

    What is the medium for gravity. Because as far as we know gravity has moving waves.

    • @EnergyWaveTheory
      @EnergyWaveTheory  6 років тому +2

      It is the same thing for gravity... aether. There is no need for multiple fields (or fluid wave substances) for multiple forces. Just one substance (aether) and forces are a result of different wave types and interactions in the aether. There is a video in this channel on gravity if you are interested in the details.

    • @muntee33
      @muntee33 5 років тому +2

      Space time fabric apparently

    • @kudr66
      @kudr66 5 років тому +4

      @@EnergyWaveTheory Interesting idea about aether as a medium for light. However, as we know today, the light is very different from all other waves you mentioned:
      1. The light is not mechanical (or pressure, or acoustic) wave. There are no moving particles, bouncing to each other causing the propagation of the pressure differences and so on. It is a combination of two oscillating fields - electric & magnetic. Change in one produces the change in other.
      2. At any moment the total energy of the wavefront is the sum of energies of those 2 fields.
      3. Both (E & M) fields are transverse (perpendicular to the direction of propagation) which in case of acoustic waves would require the aether to be solid.
      4. If the light wave was mechanical, there would be no difference between E & M fields. Both would be a mechanical stress of the aether material, so we would no be able to distinguish between them - but we obviously are. How is that possible? Are there 2 different aethers (one E and one M)? And the third one for G waves?
      Could you please address those issues and elaborate a bit more? Your explanation is so vague, that it seems to be only narrative without any substantial background (similar to flat earth or electric universe). To be considered at least a scientific hypothesis it requires that one can test it. So what are the testable predictions?
      thanks in advance

    • @muntee33
      @muntee33 5 років тому +1

      Follow the harmonic spiral down.... further than hydrogen....

    • @EnergyWaveTheory
      @EnergyWaveTheory  5 років тому +1

      @@kudr66, thanks for the questions. The aether video is a quick introduction but without getting into any details. The EWT web site goes into the details and includes calculations matching existing experiments and also proposes new, testable predictions. The relevant page to answer questions #1 - #4 is this page on the photon: energywavetheory.com/photons/. It's also high-level, but it links to details from that page and hopefully addresses your questions. Also note the links to calculations of 250+ photon energies, complete with equations and data that can be downloaded from the web site. The second question in #4 about gravity waves is not in that section. Gravity is explained separately here: energywavetheory.com/forces/gravity/.

  • @mattm4557
    @mattm4557 4 роки тому +11

    I’ve always wondered if Aether does exist but we don’t have technology that can detect it and quantify it.

    • @ZackWolfMusic
      @ZackWolfMusic 4 роки тому +6

      All wireless telecommunications such as phone network, internet, tv use the aether because phones have antenna in them so do most other electronics that send and receive radio wave signals to and from one electronic device to cell tower. Aether sends and
      Receives radio signals to and from . Why do you think their is cellur towers they are sending and receiving cell signal using antennas pointed up at the sky so the radio waves can be sent using the aether! Wireless radio waves can travel thousands of miles away because the aether is every where in the sky! Satellites are a hoax to hide the free energy resources that the aether provides! Your comcast, direct tv, spectrum, dish and many others are using cell towers to send and receive radio signals across large distances using the aether! And charging you for free resources! All wireless technology is based on radio waves using the aether to send and receive signals! Or else satellites would actually be real!

    • @chadamitecheckoutredpillpl2641
      @chadamitecheckoutredpillpl2641 3 роки тому +7

      the aether is real and earth is flat. these things are obvious and selfevident.

    • @LZYDOG
      @LZYDOG 3 роки тому

      @@ZackWolfMusic LOL

    • @1Flyingfist
      @1Flyingfist 3 роки тому +3

      @@ZackWolfMusic Sorry, explain why satellites aren't real. 🤔🤔 You aren't the first person that I've heard say this.
      I don't believe that satellites work in the way that I was taught at school, because the dishes never point up into the sky. The ones that I see, point horizontally, conveniently in the same direction as the nearest radio tower.

    • @ZackWolfMusic
      @ZackWolfMusic 3 роки тому +2

      @@1Flyingfist @1Flyingfist satellites aren't real because nothing can just free float in mid air
      Without anything keeping it a float! Having cell towers for telecommunications proves satellites don't exist because
      Cell towers can send receive signals hundreds of miles away! Reason why you may see satellites pointed horizontally is because it is using a line of sight and or it has a better connection the network tower pointing horizontally. Most dishes do point upwards and that is so they can get a clear line of sight to the aether where it sends and receives radio waves from the cell tower back to antenna dish.. Were told antenna dishes are pointed up towards the sky to satellites to hide the aether is real, truth is that radio waves are pointed up to send and receive signals to the aether and bounce off it downwards to the cell tower. Aether is the rut cause of all wireless TECHNOLOGY above ground. If satellites were real why is internet have cables to trans Atlantic cable line that connects many countries all around the world to the grid?

  • @lewebusl
    @lewebusl 5 місяців тому

    What is waving is the particle itself. Its field its expanding and contracting in a perodic way. This periodic oscilation when described graphically looks like a sin or cosine. Thats the wavelike behavior. It does not need a media like the aether.

  • @rdpurdom
    @rdpurdom Рік тому +1

    In the Michelson-Morley intereometer experiment, it actually DID detect the Aether and in Mcihealson’s 1925 experiment! Einstein’s General theory of relativity stated this!

  • @OthmaneLougrari
    @OthmaneLougrari Рік тому +1

    I am also with the theory of eather existingis not possible to move without its existance:
    thid dtructure is a primitive forme that energy takes when it is displaced from a point to other like a container (exemple of a cubic formes wher energy is entring in this cube it modify its dimention and this what occure the space curvature, like an absorption of space depending of the energy level) this space absorption occures a space deformation and then what we understand as gravity. each cube deformed will dilatate the cubes around it and this dilatation will continue till the energy effect will stopped.
    I HAVE NOT EXPLAIN THIS BECAUSE OF MY ENGLISH LEVEL AND MY CONCEPT IS REALLY A BIG REVOLUTION IN PHYSICS AND I WANT TO SHARE IT WITH SCIENTISTS AND PHYSICIANS TO EXPLAINE MORE MY IDEA ABOUT THE GRAVITY, EATHER, SPACE TIME, ....

  • @sebastianstewart6894
    @sebastianstewart6894 Рік тому +1

    When you realize the Morley experiment created an entanglement that automatically prevented the success of the experiment as the the particles replicated each other's movement.

  • @remusboldis6177
    @remusboldis6177 2 роки тому +6

    The Michael and Morley experiment was designed to investigate whether the ether is immobile or driven by the rotational motion of the Earth. The rotation movement of the Earth around its axis was used and it was destined to fail, because the rays followed exactly the same path when leaving and returning, therefore the possible effects were canceled. I understood this from high school and I kind of annoyed the physics teacher. Despite the main stream science, today I believe that the ether exists and is the medium for the propagation of electromagnetic waves.

  • @goodguywake6084
    @goodguywake6084 2 роки тому +2

    The Aether has been suppressed and buried since the beginning of 19th century ,its not the fifth element it’s the the central element

  • @nightmisterio
    @nightmisterio 5 років тому +1

    What if light is a Longitudinal pulse perturbation??? What if light needs no eather to propagate? Is space full of it all the way from the stars?

    • @EnergyWaveTheory
      @EnergyWaveTheory  5 років тому

      Regarding the first question, light has transverse wave characteristics as do all EM waves. The following is a good explanation of it: socratic.org/questions/why-is-electromagnetic-radiation-a-transverse-wave. Regarding the second question, that's the difficult question to be solved. Currently, modern theories do not assume an aether, so how does light propagate? Regarding the third question, the answer would be yes in an aether theory. It would fill the universe.

    • @Xeno_Bardock
      @Xeno_Bardock 5 років тому +3

      Light and entire electromagnetic spectrum is a disturbance of the ether medium at various frequencies similar to how sound waves are disturbance of the air medium at various frequencies. Light doesn't travel through the ether, light is the ether and so are all other electromagnetic waves. Density of the ether medium determines the speed of the light and electromagnetic waves.
      Nikola Tesla said: "Light cannot be anything else but a longitudinal disturbance in the ether, involving alternate compressions and rarefactions. In other words, light can be nothing else than a sound wave in the ether."

    • @lukabc31
      @lukabc31 5 років тому +3

      the way light propagates the space is a feature of ether, not the light. We call this perturbation light but it is an impulse which has encoded a lot of information about the source which caused it.

    • @nightmisterio
      @nightmisterio 5 років тому

      A question for some of you:
      Is space void or is space full of ether?
      Because if we do need eather for light to pertobate thru then it's full of it and if it's void of it then we don't need a medium for it to pertobate thru.

    • @lukabc31
      @lukabc31 5 років тому +1

      @@nightmisterio space = ether, without ether we will never understand neither light nor particles nor EM nor gravity. Since gravitational field is in ether they are not able to find it. Cause gravity + ether = same "forbidden" agenda

  • @buddysnackit1758
    @buddysnackit1758 2 роки тому +1

    ALL...I am in need of some software that does simple simulations of particle collisions in space. Similar to the old game asteroids. If it is written in C or C++ that would be best. I found one years ago written in java script and made a quick program to see if La Sage gravitation made sense. I threw that away after being convince it was indeed a likely real thing. I'm looking for a better software platform. All replies are welcome.

    • @EnergyWaveTheory
      @EnergyWaveTheory  2 роки тому

      Lori Gardi has simulations and I think it's C or C++. You'll find her UA-cam channel at Fractal Woman. I don't want to publish her email in a comment, but it's quite easy to find if you look through papers like this one: www.researchgate.net/publication/335101008_The_Geometry_of_Particles_and_the_Explanation_of_their_Creation_and_Decay

  • @ARM_DM
    @ARM_DM 4 роки тому +6

    "What is an ether?"
    "and if we go back to earlier times"
    *Cheers bud*

    • @EnergyWaveTheory
      @EnergyWaveTheory  4 роки тому +1

      It would be nice to travel back to earlier times. :)

  • @bjarterundereim3038
    @bjarterundereim3038 4 місяці тому

    Why not just say, that Aether is the age old word for the medium that may or may not exist,
    and that we know nothing else about, other than that it would have been a good explanation if we had it?

  • @92587wayne
    @92587wayne 4 роки тому +2

    The Aether is the same as the so called Higgs Field but instead, exists as a sea of singularities that are not relative, have no numerical value, have a numerical value of Zero-0. Nada, Nothing.

  • @hosh1313
    @hosh1313 Рік тому

    The rules for an aether theory -
    1/ Photon Momentum must be conserved
    2/ The speed of light relative to the aether is always c.
    Let us consider, according to the MM Experiment, that aether is entirely dragged. This means that as a photon approaches the earth perpendicularly that it would encounter aether moving perpendicular to it. So the assumption has always been that this would mean that a photon would be “blown” in that direction. In that case, it has a component of velocity added laterally, but to maintain c that would mean that it's velocity component toward earth would need to decrease. But how could that happen? There is no force opposing the photon! For the photon to change direction would mean we break the law of conservation of momentum. The momentum can only change if the component of velocity toward earth is decreased, and again, there is no force present to do that.
    Energy travelling in a medium is not a feather blowing in a breeze! Aether cross winds do not effect photons.
    If there is an aether it will lead to space travel when we learn how to swim in it (propeller). We have been fools to allow our gaze to be taken off aether!

  • @phyarth8082
    @phyarth8082 2 роки тому +1

    Introduction to Energy Wave Theory - The Simplicity of Particles, Photons, Atoms, and Forces. Is very nicely shown the linearity of particles energy where the smallest particle with the lowest energy is neutrino (massless particle). Ok it is a bit chicken and egg logical loop but yeah all other sounds, waves water waves require media with density. I thin answer hides in the Plank equation it was derived with summation where radiation can not have zero frequency, the neutrino is a particle with very very very low frequency (energy) and is massless and in my view, we lowest wave-particle neutrino is media, where other higher frequency particles exist electron is not a particle, is just wave equation and is according Heisenberg Matrix which based on Fourier series and Schrodinger wave equation based on classical mechanics wave equation. I think neutrino - aether wave is a building block of our reality, our space is filled with low-energy neutrino particles and the random nature of intelligent design created all matter from it. Massless means the density of neutrino particles is very very small which is a contradiction to the Higgs boson The Higgs particle gives everything else in the universe mass, To me, the Higgs boson is a viscosity physics unit that is very bad thinking Higgs Boson slows down the light speed and particles acceleration it is opposite to your theory where starts from smallest to highest and smallest particles is building material for heavier particles with linear tendency from a neutrino. Plank constant can be neutrino aether energy value and density value.

  • @philoso377
    @philoso377 8 місяців тому

    M&M experiment and interferometry was based on incorrect understanding Aether’s properties. That Aether wind blows pass and not attached to all matter.
    When a medium isn’t attached to matter vibration energy cannot couple through the matter-medium junction to transmit or receive wave. Such as sound wave in vacuum jar. Ripple in a dried pond. Wale call in waterless ocean.
    The experiment tells us that Aether attached to the interferometer responsible for null fringe activities.
    However Aether velocity lags by a factor of 1/r to the nearest body or bodies.
    Aether velocity in deep space has a mean value of all matter in the universe scaled by the distance r.

  • @635574
    @635574 6 років тому +4

    Just because there is a medium it shouldn't be called ether, since as the electric universe research shows the space isn't empry, it is invisble plasma and as such even the so called vacuum is a medium, and anything else is its own medium. Air, water, glass anything. Ether assumes that there is additional medium regardless of the known ones that makes it unnecessary.

    • @EnergyWaveTheory
      @EnergyWaveTheory  6 років тому +3

      You raise a good point. It is essentially an "electric universe" as you refer to it. The property of the aether in the energy wave constants is density. It's one of only five constants needed for the theory to derive the fundamental constants, including the properties of the electric universe such as the magnetic constant (vacuum permeability) and the electric constant (vacuum permittivity). The information on the EWT constants are here: energywavetheory.com/equations/ and how they derive the fundamental physical constants are here: energywavetheory.com/physics-constants/calculations-fundamental-physical-constants/

    • @lukiepoole6701
      @lukiepoole6701 5 років тому +1

      Sadly the concept of aether is misunderstood. Be it that there is matter.
      The most important point that *absolutely* proof the aether is magnetic flux themselves. First, flux don't cancel itself. Second, flux obeys action and reaction and proven by alternator, electrical transformer(HEAVILY MISUNDERSTOOD BY ELECTRICAL ENGINEERS), and motor.

  • @rlohiya234
    @rlohiya234 4 роки тому

    Sir You are saying that aether is existing but the special theory of relativity would become wrong then why we are taught special theory of relativity if it is wrong

    • @EnergyWaveTheory
      @EnergyWaveTheory  4 роки тому

      I didn't say special theory of relativity is wrong. In fact, the Doppler effect of wave motion in a substance (i.e. aether) helps to explain some of the behaviors of relativity. energywavetheory.com/explanations/what-is-relativity

    • @rlohiya234
      @rlohiya234 4 роки тому

      But if aether is not existing then it implies that special theory of relativity is wrong because then speed of light would not remain constant

    • @rlohiya234
      @rlohiya234 4 роки тому

      And in fact einstien himself required aether to explain general theory of relativity

    • @EnergyWaveTheory
      @EnergyWaveTheory  4 роки тому

      @@rlohiya234 To your point, Einstein didn't rule out an aether so I don't know why they would be mutually exclusive (relativity and aether). Einstein did publish his works after the Michelson-Morley experiment on the aether, so he would have to be careful about referencing it in his works to be accepted.

    • @rlohiya234
      @rlohiya234 4 роки тому

      If aether does not exist then how can aether even have density as used by you

  • @eu29lex16
    @eu29lex16 2 роки тому +1

    Hmm, another thing I think about aether ! I genuinely think it's not infinite, I think it has a limit, cuz nature must have a limit, we see finite LIMITS in EVERYTHING, and that the limit of the ether should be about the size of the cosmos ! The ether having a finite size makes sense(even tough space can be endless), you can see that LIGHT requires TIME in order to get somewhere, something which is infinity is not bound by time, it would have a infinite speed, and light does NOT have a infinite speed, it's a finite one, which MEANS that the COSMOS cannot EXPAND instantly in all reality, only in a concentrated/focused amount.
    Because of this, I personally think there is no other cosmos, and instead of other universes, we have a lot them GROUPED into one.

  • @AnnoyingCritic-is7rp
    @AnnoyingCritic-is7rp 5 місяців тому

    You can have an aether and measure all motion with respect to it. The point is you don't have to have one. That motion is relative to the observer.

  • @BlagenLogin
    @BlagenLogin 5 років тому

    The Michelson Morley experiment did not fail to detect an Aether wind. It detected a very low movement. But that is significant because there isn't NO movement.
    The Aether was just mathematically removed. It wasn't discarded. Think about the Sagnac effect.
    The Aether is there, it's just mis-described.
    What if the Earth is stationary and this energy is the source of 'gravity' and why everything we see in the sky moves.

  • @mediawolf1
    @mediawolf1 5 місяців тому

    It would be more accurate, as well as more supportive of your argument, to say that the experiment was designed to detect, and failed to detect, the predicted aether *wind*. Whatever aether is if it exists, it doesn't behave like a stationary medium through which we can measure our motion, like we can air.

  • @katzelo8694
    @katzelo8694 4 роки тому +4

    As Carl Sagan famously said, “absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.” We have no proof that the aether exists, but can never prove the negative: that no aether exists. All we can demonstrate, and have demonstrated, is that if the aether exists, it has no properties that affect the matter and radiation that we do observe.

  • @JeshuSavesEndTimeMinistry21C
    @JeshuSavesEndTimeMinistry21C 2 роки тому

    Simple laser shows amplification medium requirement
    Gain medium is a material with properties that allow it
    to amplify light by way of stimulated emission.

  • @ShawnDaniel
    @ShawnDaniel Рік тому +6

    They've always known the aether exists. They simply changed the name from 'aether' to 'dark matter' and said "We don't know what it is, but we know it's there!"

  • @furryface1057
    @furryface1057 4 роки тому +1

    could the Aether be a living Entity and therefore God ? and could the Aether block out the Sun but cause no shadow or darkness ?

    • @ZackWolfMusic
      @ZackWolfMusic 4 роки тому +3

      God spoke aether into existence read your bible. The aether is a light as stated in the bible and it surrounds the entire world!

    • @furryface1057
      @furryface1057 3 роки тому

      @@ZackWolfMusic the aether is not the light that's the sun

    • @ZackWolfMusic
      @ZackWolfMusic 3 роки тому +4

      @@furryface1057 No Aether is the light that is mentioned in the bible during the creation period. Sun, moon and other celestial bodies are powered by the aether.

    • @furryface1057
      @furryface1057 3 роки тому

      @@ZackWolfMusic powered by the Aether hmmm interesting

    • @ZackWolfMusic
      @ZackWolfMusic 3 роки тому

      @@furryface1057 Yup!

  • @leonhardtkristensen4093
    @leonhardtkristensen4093 3 роки тому

    I have the thought that the Photon is a wavy blob of energy. It can collapse into an energy spot like an electron. This will in my mind eliminate a need for an Aether.

  • @sebastianstewart6894
    @sebastianstewart6894 Рік тому +1

    We can find gravity waves (aether) but no one can detect aether (it is literally space) aether is an ancient Aryan concepts for Russia that the Indians also have called akasha.

  • @spiritsplice
    @spiritsplice Рік тому

    The MM didnt fail to detect aether (they through out a bunch of data) and it was done incorrectly. Sagnac showed that the mechanism had to be rotating, which he does confirm aether.

  • @takster050974
    @takster050974 6 років тому +6

    Can I mistake ether for dark matter. It looks if that’s the same missing element.

    • @johnnyaingel5753
      @johnnyaingel5753 5 років тому +2

      TRUTH

    • @dehilster
      @dehilster 5 років тому +3

      Dark energy is based on a false premise. Dark matter does not exist.

    • @dehilster
      @dehilster 5 років тому +1

      Plasma Matter aether has not been proven. Actually there are several viable models. We don’t know which is correct.

    • @lukabc31
      @lukabc31 5 років тому +4

      @@dehilster re your "dark matter does not exist": how would you call matter that vibrates in different density? we do not see it but it is there physically and it does interact gravitationally. Why do you deny this option? Are you also in denial of Bashar existence? There is a content that he is real. So why should not this theory of "hidden matter" exist? please answer me.

    • @ramoni58
      @ramoni58 5 років тому +2

      David de Hilster USA Air force re created the michealson experiment and the ether was proven to exist.

  • @rgaleny
    @rgaleny Рік тому +1

    walter russel calls the ether light, still and as a vortex. light beams are waves of energy in it

  • @PedroHenrique-x17
    @PedroHenrique-x17 Рік тому

    If Aether doesn't exist, and since subsequent Michelson Gale experiment used the same apparatus of MM experiment set up to detect relative rotation instead of revolution, detecting 98% of it, what was being detected? What was causing the interference pattern corresponding 98% of necessary rotation speed? You are trapped