We The People with Barkha Dutt: Are all personal laws anti-women?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 5 лют 2025
  • Leading Muslim scholar and former Minorities Panel chief Tahir Mahmood calls the 'Triple Talaq' an "uncivilised law", and says it should go. We debate whether all personal laws of all religions are anti-women, and whether the time has finally come for a uniform civil code?
    Watch more videos: www.ndtv.com/vi...

КОМЕНТАРІ • 74

  • @jaisinha3634
    @jaisinha3634 9 років тому +15

    Expecting that, reform will come form itself in some specific community. This is same as we expecting one tarriest, will become a novel man him self .......GOI should implement civil code as soon as possible for all Indian citizen .....For all this non-sense congress policy is responsible ............

  • @sk_network6198
    @sk_network6198 8 років тому +2

    Some of the panelists are comparing rituals like saath phere,Nikha with triple talaq and polygamy. There will be some points in every religion which have to be governed by law.So Uniform Civil code should be implemented.

  • @listencarefully3891
    @listencarefully3891 8 років тому +8

    Kamal Faruqui is waste of time. Barkha, you must not invite him. He is so irritating. He is neither intelligent nor brave.
    Mr.Manish Tewari expressed almost the similar views like Mr.Kamal, you can see the clarity of thought. Though im against the views of Mr.Manish, I atleast felt like listening. But Mr.Kamal is so waste, I felt like forwarding the video when he was talking, he does not use logic at all.

  • @jeetnjoy
    @jeetnjoy 9 років тому +4

    religion is and should be personal and it should be left to the individual,but when it comes to LAW it sould be equal for all the citizens,especially in a DEMOCRATIC country like ours, how come a women or a childs right of a certian religion different from the rights of a women and children from a different community,that to when they belong to da same COUNTRY,if religion is cosidered to be personal,then why should it interfere with the law of a country,i think the govt is moving in da right direction,there should be more debate on this issue on a regular basis,at panchayat level,schools,colleges and public & pvt institutions

  • @ravishkumartipu
    @ravishkumartipu 9 років тому +6

    Why Manish tewari ever-interrupting. Is he trying to prove that he is bigger muslim than Sahabuddin ?
    BTW, its a Ghar Waapsi of Burka Dutt to Barkha Dutt !! Lolwa !! Modi effect ?

  • @gopeshjha4845
    @gopeshjha4845 8 років тому

    The name of Muslim speaker is Kamal Faruqi instead of Maruf Raza

  • @harshshah64
    @harshshah64 8 років тому +8

    Congress has done nothing in 65 years..

    • @DipakBose-bq1vv
      @DipakBose-bq1vv 8 років тому

      Since 1915 The Congress was taken over by a some of the most evil people of India, Gandhi, Gokhle, Patel, Rajendra Parsad Yadav, Nehru etc etc. They only wanted power and to get the power they were prepared to do anything, polishing the boots of the British, appeasement of the Muslims, partitioning India, asking refugees to return back to Pakistan.

    • @omprakashsoni6823
      @omprakashsoni6823 8 років тому

      6 बच्चों की मां को 35 साल की उम्र में एक सासं में तीन बार तलाक कहने पर वह औरत इस्लामी कानून के अनुसार हराम हो जाती है। मेहर की राशि देकर उससे छुटकारा पाया जा सकता है।

  • @Paharimaanu
    @Paharimaanu 9 років тому +4

    will uniform civil code also ban Sikhs to carry Kirpan or Swords with them ?

    • @Attitudezero884
      @Attitudezero884 8 років тому +1

      no dude it applies in judicial system only while we r following same judicial system as u

    • @Aravind-xm7gg
      @Aravind-xm7gg 5 років тому

      It mandates uniformity only when it comes to Marriage, divorce, adoption, property rights and a few others. It doesn't impose against religious beliefs

  • @parthpatel-rm5gi
    @parthpatel-rm5gi 8 років тому

    good discussion

  • @usmanhameed2364
    @usmanhameed2364 8 років тому

    so if uniform civil code is implemented there wont be any beef ban bcoz it is as we know a relgiously inspired law that left other communities vulnerable to senseless violence

    • @vishal12272227
      @vishal12272227 8 років тому +2

      tell me one thing that why only men want to follow muslim personel law, do they want ******** from more and more women,, u lusty people

  • @AnwarMasihUddin
    @AnwarMasihUddin 8 років тому +1

    We the People with Barkha Dutt, thanks to conduct the TV debate “in between the lines” on the subject of Triple Talaq in Muslim Community.
    Talaq is not the appreciated by our lord, either in one sitting or in triple, during the Three Months Time period. Only Marriage is precious and respectable in view of our lord. Talaq will come after the Marriage, even as a last resort in complete failure of the married life of the couple (Husband & Wife) proved that, they have no more kept happy each other. The evils of the society takes the Married couple closer to the Talaq. Islam from the day one, made the provision for easy marriages and closed the door for adultery, not enjoy the sex like the animals.
    Sex is the most important element in our daily life, it is one of the primary needs of the adult Gender. Every adult Gender (Male & Female) should have the legal partnership in shape of marriage. Carried out the responsibility of the relationship being a Husband & Wife, Father & Mother, Grand Father & Grand Mother, To establish the health society.
    Those who have been raised the voice for the uniform civil code. They are innocent and lack of knowledge.
    A comprehensive religion-debate will conduct, in between the man-made religions and its policies and the lord made Islam for our clear understanding, believe and practicing.

  • @pranavendharreddy5855
    @pranavendharreddy5855 9 років тому +5

    its up to muslim women to take rights by kicking manish tiwari by not voting to congress than they will agree

  • @mahendradwivedi5635
    @mahendradwivedi5635 5 років тому

    do not know why people discussed on jahil

  • @pbrbhakta
    @pbrbhakta 5 років тому

    How come Nehru 'imposed' a common Hindy Code but could not do the same for Muslims?

  • @vishal12272227
    @vishal12272227 8 років тому

    best debate in indian news channel,,, best of luck barkha

  • @pranavendharreddy5855
    @pranavendharreddy5855 9 років тому +5

    jai modiji the reformer in chief ,he is amking these channels to bring out real issues which were put on back burner.............uniform civil code is a must...one law for every one...for ones well done NDTV

  • @listencarefully3891
    @listencarefully3891 8 років тому

    Prof Neera Chandhoke is super intellect. Mr. Kamal and Mr.Manish learn from her, shouting does not make u great but quality points willl make u great

  • @S_fdr01
    @S_fdr01 8 років тому +1

    she was raped before talaq, so y not national discussion on rape.

    • @acv5841
      @acv5841 6 років тому

      There is already law in which one can get death sentence for rape

  • @student-hs5dq
    @student-hs5dq 8 років тому

    There is no need of this debate with participants who are not qualified. Hindu law does it based on any legal and valid source, if they are changing it makes nothing. Hindus in North India Can not marry cousins or relation or nevies (Son/ gaughter of sister / brother) but these relations are most preferable. An own sister in Maharashtrian Brahmin offer her daughter to her own brother for marriage and accept him as son in law, can you change this. Who can say some thing for marriage of Hindu film actors to muslim girls..

  • @md.asadkamal4075
    @md.asadkamal4075 2 роки тому

    Instant triple talaq is not in quran

  • @vickykr5686
    @vickykr5686 8 років тому +6

    see how shah bano son is supporting her mother injustice. aise gaddar paida hote hain mullo mei.

    • @MrIndee4u
      @MrIndee4u 8 років тому

      Vicky Kr he will be killed if not bought

  • @MrRambhakt
    @MrRambhakt 8 років тому

    marriage is simply a contract in Islam , so the relation between husband & wife is like that of an engineer & a contractor !!!

  • @vickykr5686
    @vickykr5686 8 років тому

    see her first 3 lines how she addresses.

  • @KhalidMehmood-mj3by
    @KhalidMehmood-mj3by 6 років тому

    submit putra can be minster anyway he can replace jetly
    he speaks good english

  • @student-hs5dq
    @student-hs5dq 8 років тому

    Ask the participants do they know that there is on big chapter with the name AL TALLAQUE in Quran. Can any of the religious book in the world show such example. All these participants are showing there view to take position only. Uniform civil code can not be adopted due to variation in the religous orders. First make UCC for Hindues, Sikhs, Christian, tribles etc

    • @ravikirange10983
      @ravikirange10983 8 років тому

      +student 1949 Uniform Civil Code is for all. Nobody except some Muslim clerics opposing this.

  • @parmess5875
    @parmess5875 8 років тому

    who has devoloped india....in 65 years

  • @nishaupadhyay2648
    @nishaupadhyay2648 2 роки тому

    22:30

  • @vmahant1
    @vmahant1 7 років тому

    One of the examples of marriage is marriages without registration. I personally know some people marry under Hindu tradition and come to USA and marry again without divorcing the original wife. This is sad, but it is bound to happen. Uniform civil code is very important! Answers have to come from within sounds great, but that is not to happen!

  • @mahadevpowar6553
    @mahadevpowar6553 5 років тому

    Common civil law is about rights notabout rituals

  • @listencarefully3891
    @listencarefully3891 8 років тому

    Mr.Kamal behaves as if he is the sole defender of Islam. Take some rest Mr.Kamal, just chill. Have a beer(even if it is not allowed in Islam). Double standards.

  • @jatinkumawat6387
    @jatinkumawat6387 7 років тому

    NDTV, why are you biased only about rights of Muslims only?

  • @ASHOKYADAV-to7on
    @ASHOKYADAV-to7on 5 років тому

    Kya english me debet krana jruri he , jo victim banu he vo english nhi janti agar hindi me debet hoti to vo banu samaj shakti jo actually victm of muslim law is it in london aur india drbeting , this like a some stupid that banu need to undrstand in hindi bhash....

  • @nishaupadhyay2648
    @nishaupadhyay2648 2 роки тому

    12:50

  • @advocatedanishahmadansari8800
    @advocatedanishahmadansari8800 8 років тому

    M nt gouging to abuse you ma'am like all BJP suppoters but I will tell you Muslim personal law iz very good for us

  • @SHIVAMSINGH-oy4pp
    @SHIVAMSINGH-oy4pp 5 років тому +1

    sanbit patra is good in english ...kanhaiya jeet nhi paayega

  • @MrIndee4u
    @MrIndee4u 8 років тому

    Brute force over turned it, arrogant
    Choir ki daadi mein tinka
    Incentive to convert is lost --- that's the crux

  • @pranavendharreddy5855
    @pranavendharreddy5855 9 років тому +2

    congress should be kicked out of the country..

  • @md.asadkamal4075
    @md.asadkamal4075 2 роки тому

    Gender justice more important

  • @yantpsinghp7713
    @yantpsinghp7713 7 років тому

    EN GREEB MAHELAO KAY PISSA KHANAKO HAIN NAHE, WAKEEL KAY LIYA PISSA KAHA SAY LAYAGIE. BHASHAN ,BHASHAN AUR BHASHAN. YES DR. QURASHI ENLIGHTEN THE BLIGH MINDS OF FUCKROOKHI AND OTHERS.MANISH TAWARI WILL ALWAYS FIND A WAY AROUND ONLY CONGRESSI CHORS CAN DO THAT.

  • @md.asadkamal4075
    @md.asadkamal4075 2 роки тому

    Ban the aimplb

  • @shankarlinga2493
    @shankarlinga2493 9 років тому

    ndtv news i a so sad this channel must and should banned govt

  • @asadkamal4329
    @asadkamal4329 10 місяців тому

    Ucc needed

  • @afghanmohammad1177
    @afghanmohammad1177 9 років тому

    .......