@@HDL_CinC_Dragon yeah it's a solid "visual storytelling" point. It's interesting they didn't use that. Especially since it would only have to be shown like 1 or 2 times in the entirety of the series. So it's not that much more work I'd think.
@@SyntheticFuture No pretty way to make that early scene with Norrington work, I guess. Pretending to offer a friendly handshake, then suddenly revealing the pirate brand is pretty straightforward. Forcibly pushing aside Jack's headband is a much more hostile move to modern sensibilities and coming up with an innocuous excuse to have Jack move the headband himself would just come off as incredibly contrived (and dumb on Jack's part if he actually did it and revealed the brand).
Actually, they could have branded Jack's forehead and Jack just covers it with the bandana, but anyone else who was caught and branded would have to also have the letter 'P' on their foreheads. By the way, if you missed what Jack says in one of the movies, as it's in the deleted scenes, people should check out the reason why he was branded as a pirate in the first place. Makes you really see Jack as a true hero worth rooting for. Cutler Beckett: "I contracted you to deliver cargo on my behalf. You chose to liberate it." Jack: "People aren't cargo, mate."
When the video mentioned "Lighting the way" in Titanic, I thought it was going to be about the moonlight. It looks like the full moon is out which allows us to see the actors as the ship is going down, but the Titanic sank on a moonless night. That's part of the reason the iceberg was nearly impossible to spot until it was too late. The ocean was also very calm which meant no breaking white water against the berg.
I came here to say this. It also means that the Titanic would have been invisible when the lights finally went out and it's why there was so much debate on whether the ship broke in two during the sinking or after the ship was already submerged. The survivors simply could not see it in the black of the night.
To be fair in the Skyfall chase you never actually see the central bit of the escalator until after Silva has pretty much slid down it. There's even a dislodged 'stand on the right' sign on the floor as Silva lands (6:47), suggesting he knocked it (and others) off as he went down. Of course in reality they wouldn't just pop off like that but the filmmakers clearly tried to acknowledge they'd be there. But then they also tried to suggest that Silva knew exactly where - and when - he'd be chased so he could set up an explosive that dropped a tube train on Bond, so...
In "The Matrix" they could use the fact they were inside a simulation to hide mistakes in plain sight. Morpheus could change glasses instantly because he's inside a simulation created by the humans, not inside the Matrix.
It’s in the construct too, so I see it as not being “rendered” yet because the matrix is more advanced than floppy disks. Even though Neo gives the guy software stored on minidiscs.
If you make a part 2 of this, I know that in Gravity there is an easter egg where you can see a cameraman and another person holding a boom mike in spacesuits in a reflection on one of the character's space suit helmet glass. It was put there as a joke to reference that the movie was actually filmed in space instead of using CGI.
They at least call the storm in the Martian record breaking which gives it a pretty normal "what if" structure. "What if a freakishly strong storm interfered with the first manned mission to Mars "
#1: *The Flash-* Director defends that the CGI being bad when the Flash uses his speedforce is intentional because, you know, the Flash has the power to warp CGI.
I always thought it was a rather neat, subtle use of CGI in Avatar where they had gas masks with no glass, which they filled in later, because all of the reflections in a digital environment would have been wrong.
While this was probably not an intentional mistake in Commando it does have a fantastic continuity error. Just after Matrix tells Sully he lied about promising to kill him last and drops him off a cliff, (with a hilarious scream from Sully as he falls I might add). Matrix pushes Sully's Porsche back onto it's wheels & it's smashed all along the drivers side but as they drive away it's completely undamaged.
You are right, although at first, I thought you were wrong, as I remember this movie from the eighties. I remembered that when he drove off, the right side was undamaged, as the Porsche landed on the left side, so, that made sense. Only now, after having checked this particular scene on YT, I realize that the left side miraculously recovered instantly. This escaped my attention then, as DVD quality was apparently not good enough as to have revealed it to me when I watched the movie in the nineties on a rather small TV screen.
The only one of these I think isn't justifiable is the sandstorm in The Martian. The rest of the book and film were so accurate that this stands out. If your goal is accuracy, you shouldn't settle on something inaccurate just to forward the plot. There are any number of more realistic disasters Andy Weir could have used to achieve the same goal.
The author did a great job, not a perfect one. He couldn't exactly visit the scene to test theories. Another problem is that there is less insolation on Mars, meaning the potato patch wasn't big enough.
Didn't he say that he did that just for drama and thrill? In one of the interview. He was initially going something with an engine experiment gone wrong.... didn't go that much tho.
One "mistake" I like is from 2001: A Space Odyssey with the missing blue sweater. When Dr. Floyd meets the Russians, one of the ladies has a blue cashmere sweater laying over her chair, but in some camera angles, the sweater is missing, then reappears again in other shots. Seems like an error in continuity, but just a few minutes before Dr. Floyd even meets the Russians, a pa announcement says, "A blue ladies cashmere sweater has been found in the restroom, it can be claimed in the managers desk." Foreshadowing the movie's strange themes of time and space travel.
As far as "Titanic" (Not that I give a shit about the movie, or anything. I give it 5 on a 10 scale, at best), there has been a constant argument over whether or not Jack would have fit on the headboard with Whatshername. I've come to the conclusion that whether or not Jack wouldn't fit didn't matter, he wouldn't have attempted to climb onto the headboard, because it might've FLIPPED. He deduced correctly that getting Kate Winslet's character onto that plank of wood wasn't the problem, would it have flipped while she was moving over to make room for his half-dead struggling ass? He decided to let it be. Love sometimes asks for ultimate sacrifice, one of the few realistic plot points dealt with effectively. Unfortunately, this leaves the audience hanging on for one of the lamest endings of a movie ever created. Yeah, they met again in heaven. People loved that. I don't disregard the existence of heaven, I just think that any movie that ends in the Afterlife without it being a present- part of the main story is a douchey fucking cop-out ending. Just thought I'd mention it.
Another "mistake" is that there was no moonlight the night the titanic sank, but then again, the movie couldn't just go completely dark for one hour, with just some stars in the background, once the lights of the titanic went off (although it might have been cool)
2:35 So it wasn’t intentional. This makes no sense at all to include. It’s literally in the film because of an accident, and they would have removed it if they could.
or they was put there as a "paper town" so in court they can "your honor the legit copy we forgot to render 1 frame of movement where as the imposter rendered that frame"
During the beginning of inglorious bastards, in the scene where you can see soldiers standing in a file line and brad pitt walking left and right that file, notice is movement carefully and you’ll see him teleport back. Probably a mistake which was overlooked, felt super bug brain to be the person to notice the error
If we're talking about realism, the King Kong should have a giant sausage flopping all over the screen but movie magic makes him asexual (his bottom has literally nothing).
Is there something weird going on with Jules' mic? I'm hearing some very high pitched digital artifacts that are amplified for the first half of the video I've watched so far
@@el-kiote yes, because being in quotation marks means they aren't really mistakes. In other words, they're INTENTIONAL. I don't know why you aren't grasping this concept lol
There is a photo taking scene in The Martian. He is looking directly at the camera. But what is sent? A movie camera still. I've noticed this films where pictures are taken. Why is that?
Couldn't they digitally erase the camera on Morpheus's glasses? I think they did that when they realized that C3PO reflective surface showed a camera in the remake.
that would require additional CGI budget and they were already spending a lot on more important effects sometimes practical solutions are best, they also have one other scene where they need to shoot a shiny doorknob a character was using and instead of digitally removing the camera for that scene they just shot it using a hidden camera sewn in the actors suit button
Not your fault by any means and I'm sure a lot of staff disagreed probably but the disney one is just plain stupid. If you lack the ability to keep an injury canon from scene to scene maybe you should use a different injury. That or more simply agree that 'white-washing' (in the regards that you're 'purifying' the scene, not in reference to race - like how schools saying pilgrims and native Americans got together in harmony and shared food together happily despite it basically being a one sided invasion is white-washing) gruesome injuries and downplaying the consequences of prior events is insulting to reality.
Saw though it is to admit I have physical experience regarding the escalator goof having attempted such a ‘stunt’ back in my youth way before Daniel Craig had even become a household name. I should add that I’m in no way proud of said childhood antics as I still recall the severe grazing it gave my bum hole and testes and how I subsequently had to hide the pain, embarrassment and severe chafing from my fellow teenage ‘rebels’ until I could get home and apply some much needed first aid and padding to me extremely sore backside. Definitely a case of shaken, stirred, scratched, sore and for my eyes only!
![Lp. Сердце Вселенной #60 РОЖДЕНИЕ ЛОЛОЛОШКИ [Финал] • Майнкрафт](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/YoR0pAV9FVQ/mqdefault.jpg)
Honestly, the brand being on Jack's forehead would work with him always wearing that headband.
Actually would make sense for him to wear the headband to hide the brand.
That's what I thought too! It'd be the perfect explanation for that part of his wardrobe.
@@HDL_CinC_Dragon yeah it's a solid "visual storytelling" point. It's interesting they didn't use that. Especially since it would only have to be shown like 1 or 2 times in the entirety of the series. So it's not that much more work I'd think.
@@SyntheticFuture No pretty way to make that early scene with Norrington work, I guess. Pretending to offer a friendly handshake, then suddenly revealing the pirate brand is pretty straightforward. Forcibly pushing aside Jack's headband is a much more hostile move to modern sensibilities and coming up with an innocuous excuse to have Jack move the headband himself would just come off as incredibly contrived (and dumb on Jack's part if he actually did it and revealed the brand).
@@martenkahr3365😂😂😂😂 yeah that's a good point
Actually, they could have branded Jack's forehead and Jack just covers it with the bandana, but anyone else who was caught and branded would have to also have the letter 'P' on their foreheads.
By the way, if you missed what Jack says in one of the movies, as it's in the deleted scenes, people should check out the reason why he was branded as a pirate in the first place. Makes you really see Jack as a true hero worth rooting for.
Cutler Beckett: "I contracted you to deliver cargo on my behalf. You chose to liberate it."
Jack: "People aren't cargo, mate."
When the video mentioned "Lighting the way" in Titanic, I thought it was going to be about the moonlight. It looks like the full moon is out which allows us to see the actors as the ship is going down, but the Titanic sank on a moonless night. That's part of the reason the iceberg was nearly impossible to spot until it was too late. The ocean was also very calm which meant no breaking white water against the berg.
I came here to say this. It also means that the Titanic would have been invisible when the lights finally went out and it's why there was so much debate on whether the ship broke in two during the sinking or after the ship was already submerged. The survivors simply could not see it in the black of the night.
To be fair in the Skyfall chase you never actually see the central bit of the escalator until after Silva has pretty much slid down it. There's even a dislodged 'stand on the right' sign on the floor as Silva lands (6:47), suggesting he knocked it (and others) off as he went down. Of course in reality they wouldn't just pop off like that but the filmmakers clearly tried to acknowledge they'd be there.
But then they also tried to suggest that Silva knew exactly where - and when - he'd be chased so he could set up an explosive that dropped a tube train on Bond, so...
In "The Matrix" they could use the fact they were inside a simulation to hide mistakes in plain sight. Morpheus could change glasses instantly because he's inside a simulation created by the humans, not inside the Matrix.
It’s in the construct too, so I see it as not being “rendered” yet because the matrix is more advanced than floppy disks. Even though Neo gives the guy software stored on minidiscs.
yeah was kinda thinking the same thing a sort of LOD thing
If you make a part 2 of this, I know that in Gravity there is an easter egg where you can see a cameraman and another person holding a boom mike in spacesuits in a reflection on one of the character's space suit helmet glass. It was put there as a joke to reference that the movie was actually filmed in space instead of using CGI.
mic*
They at least call the storm in the Martian record breaking which gives it a pretty normal "what if" structure. "What if a freakishly strong storm interfered with the first manned mission to Mars "
#1: *The Flash-* Director defends that the CGI being bad when the Flash uses his speedforce is intentional because, you know, the Flash has the power to warp CGI.
The classic background music!
I always thought it was a rather neat, subtle use of CGI in Avatar where they had gas masks with no glass, which they filled in later, because all of the reflections in a digital environment would have been wrong.
While this was probably not an intentional mistake in Commando it does have a fantastic continuity error. Just after Matrix tells Sully he lied about promising to kill him last and drops him off a cliff, (with a hilarious scream from Sully as he falls I might add). Matrix pushes Sully's Porsche back onto it's wheels & it's smashed all along the drivers side but as they drive away it's completely undamaged.
Well he wouldn't be much of a Commando if he couldn't fix cars...
@@komodosp LMAO 😆
You are right, although at first, I thought you were wrong, as I remember this movie from the eighties. I remembered that when he drove off, the right side was undamaged, as the Porsche landed on the left side, so, that made sense. Only now, after having checked this particular scene on YT, I realize that the left side miraculously recovered instantly. This escaped my attention then, as DVD quality was apparently not good enough as to have revealed it to me when I watched the movie in the nineties on a rather small TV screen.
The only one of these I think isn't justifiable is the sandstorm in The Martian. The rest of the book and film were so accurate that this stands out. If your goal is accuracy, you shouldn't settle on something inaccurate just to forward the plot. There are any number of more realistic disasters Andy Weir could have used to achieve the same goal.
The author did a great job, not a perfect one. He couldn't exactly visit the scene to test theories.
Another problem is that there is less insolation on Mars, meaning the potato patch wasn't big enough.
Didn't he say that he did that just for drama and thrill? In one of the interview. He was initially going something with an engine experiment gone wrong.... didn't go that much tho.
Best formatting in a while!!!
One "mistake" I like is from 2001: A Space Odyssey with the missing blue sweater. When Dr. Floyd meets the Russians, one of the ladies has a blue cashmere sweater laying over her chair, but in some camera angles, the sweater is missing, then reappears again in other shots. Seems like an error in continuity, but just a few minutes before Dr. Floyd even meets the Russians, a pa announcement says, "A blue ladies cashmere sweater has been found in the restroom, it can be claimed in the managers desk." Foreshadowing the movie's strange themes of time and space travel.
The scarecrow in wizard of Oz sporting a pistol in one scene would of been a good one to hear the story behind too
I would have assumed the matrix simulation wasn't running on ultra high quality for a moment until someone realized XD
Love your channel guys!😊😊❤😊❤😊😊❤
The power lines and satellite dishes visible on the French houses in Hornblower: Loyalty have always made me chuckle
Great video as always🎉🎉🎉🎉
Wizard of Oz was not intentional... It was unavoidable
What bugged me way more than the bulky electric lantern was the second crewman's sleek MagLite :D
Five films later: have we seen Sparrow's forehead once?! 😮
My favorite mistake in The Wizard of Oz
Tin Doesn't Rust
I can't tell if you really believe that or not. It doesn't if it's galvanized. otherwise....
Not a Tyrannosaurus.
A Vastatosaurus.
As far as "Titanic" (Not that I give a shit about the movie, or anything. I give it 5 on a 10 scale, at best), there has been a constant argument over whether or not Jack would have fit on the headboard with Whatshername. I've come to the conclusion that whether or not Jack wouldn't fit didn't matter, he wouldn't have attempted to climb onto the headboard, because it might've FLIPPED. He deduced correctly that getting Kate Winslet's character onto that plank of wood wasn't the problem, would it have flipped while she was moving over to make room for his half-dead struggling ass? He decided to let it be. Love sometimes asks for ultimate sacrifice, one of the few realistic plot points dealt with effectively. Unfortunately, this leaves the audience hanging on for one of the lamest endings of a movie ever created. Yeah, they met again in heaven. People loved that. I don't disregard the existence of heaven, I just think that any movie that ends in the Afterlife without it being a present- part of the main story is a douchey fucking cop-out ending. Just thought I'd mention it.
Another "mistake" is that there was no moonlight the night the titanic sank, but then again, the movie couldn't just go completely dark for one hour, with just some stars in the background, once the lights of the titanic went off (although it might have been cool)
Forget the yellow noses on the planes in Dunkirk. The "German" planes are the entirely wrong planes!
Also the beach looks like a nice tourist destination instead of the blasted hellscape filled with destroyed vehicles and wounded soldiers that it was
Tarzan and the leopard have Wolverine's healing factor, confirmed.
The producers are geniuses for convincing us of this.
Laurence Fishburne’s googly eyes in the thumbnail is now my full-time mental image when someone mentions his name.
You could do a hole list of mistakes in military movies. Rank, awards, uniforms, haircuts, saluting wrong to name a few.
2:35 So it wasn’t intentional. This makes no sense at all to include. It’s literally in the film because of an accident, and they would have removed it if they could.
One boat in the disaster did have an electric torch.
But not Lowe's.
It was a walking stick with a built in torch. Mrs Ella white
I always thought that reflections on Morpheus' glasses were CGI'd
0:35 mf hit it with the r_cleardecals
or they was put there as a "paper town" so in court they can "your honor the legit copy we forgot to render 1 frame of movement where as the imposter rendered that frame"
During the beginning of inglorious bastards, in the scene where you can see soldiers standing in a file line and brad pitt walking left and right that file, notice is movement carefully and you’ll see him teleport back. Probably a mistake which was overlooked, felt super bug brain to be the person to notice the error
There's a scene in the Matrix with a closeup of a shiny doorknob, you see the camera in it, they didn't care and just left it in
In the Matrix a much better reason would be the virtual world was loading in and ray tracing wasn't ready yet
Why don't escalators have slides nearby? Just lean into the fact that people want to slide and there aren't enough adult parks.
If we're talking about realism, the King Kong should have a giant sausage flopping all over the screen but movie magic makes him asexual (his bottom has literally nothing).
Is there something weird going on with Jules' mic? I'm hearing some very high pitched digital artifacts that are amplified for the first half of the video I've watched so far
It didn’t even sound like Jules. I didn’t even know it was him until it showed his picture
My bet is it's a reupload of a much older video, this doesn't sound like a modern recording, especially given Jules' current setup.
If it's intentional, is it a mistake?
That's why it's in quotation marks- "mistakes".
@@LavenderLydia but should it be if it's intentional?
@@el-kiote yes, because being in quotation marks means they aren't really mistakes. In other words, they're INTENTIONAL. I don't know why you aren't grasping this concept lol
I suppose IMDB's terminology "incorrectly regarded as goofs" may be a bit too long for a youtube title
You 100% could slide down the center of escalators until relatively (I'm old) recently.
There is a photo taking scene in The Martian. He is looking directly at the camera. But what is sent? A movie camera still.
I've noticed this films where pictures are taken. Why is that?
There's another one in The Martian (movie). When Watnew said that if the hab breaches, he implodes. This isn't true and it's also correct in the book
"we know it's unrealistic but did it anyway because how else would we make money"
The Wizard of Oz is still a mistake
Whomever's reading this that's closest to the coordinates: get to the studio and look for the Easter egg! 🥚
If its intentional then by definition it is Not a mistake!
Freaking hell people.
interesting one
Couldn't they digitally erase the camera on Morpheus's glasses? I think they did that when they realized that C3PO reflective surface showed a camera in the remake.
that would require additional CGI budget and they were already spending a lot on more important effects sometimes practical solutions are best, they also have one other scene where they need to shoot a shiny doorknob a character was using and instead of digitally removing the camera for that scene they just shot it using a hidden camera sewn in the actors suit button
@@reijek990 Why not have a hidden camera for the other scene?
I wonder how many on this list were noticed in post production and the directors just say it was intentional
How is "Totally intentional" that they only had a bad take to use on wizard of Oz?
Jules it's you!
Skyfloor you say?
What?!
If you squint at the thumbnail it looks like the Morpheus on the right has googly eyes.
I've tried it on escalators...no bum left. And very little ba...
If they were intentional then they were not mistakes......
Not your fault by any means and I'm sure a lot of staff disagreed probably but the disney one is just plain stupid. If you lack the ability to keep an injury canon from scene to scene maybe you should use a different injury. That or more simply agree that 'white-washing' (in the regards that you're 'purifying' the scene, not in reference to race - like how schools saying pilgrims and native Americans got together in harmony and shared food together happily despite it basically being a one sided invasion is white-washing) gruesome injuries and downplaying the consequences of prior events is insulting to reality.
Nolan shit on the real Dunkirk story anyway....
Saw though it is to admit I have physical experience regarding the escalator goof having attempted such a ‘stunt’ back in my youth way before Daniel Craig had even become a household name. I should add that I’m in no way proud of said childhood antics as I still recall the severe grazing it gave my bum hole and testes and how I subsequently had to hide the pain, embarrassment and severe chafing from my fellow teenage ‘rebels’ until I could get home and apply some much needed first aid and padding to me extremely sore backside. Definitely a case of shaken, stirred, scratched, sore and for my eyes only!
snoooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooze
Remember that scene where the guy throws up and the other guy is like "gross"? Not a mistake!
why didn't you mentione they hanging man in the "wizard of ozz" coward?!
Titanic was great
You talk so fast, slow down, take your time.
Why do you have to be vulgar with speech and action? It's completely unnecessary. [Don't recommend channel] clicked.
I think a better title would be 'intentional flaws'.