Mobile devices do not cause any interference whatsoever with avionics on an aircraft. In fact, it's illegal to manufacture and sell a mobile device that even has he ability to operate on certain frequencies. The reason they tell you to stow and turn off your mobile devices for takeoff and landing is because of legal reasons regarding safety and liability. Technically it's the PIC's job to make sure passengers are paying attention to the safety briefing before every flight, and as for takeoff and landing, it's best not to have loose, heavy, metal objects flying around if there's some turbulence. Your pilot has a tablet and a smartphone in the cockpit with him, and neither are on airplane mode.
Chris Shihadeh I'm not sure that you know enough about this to be speaking about it. I'm a pilot myself, I just explained to you why that rule exists. Also please explain what "a flight system" is, you're sounding like the current president when he talks about "nuclear weapons and things". Do you just improvise as you go?
Chris Shihadeh It's almost laughable how ignorant you are, but it's too sad to laugh at. "...is because of legal reasons regarding safety and liability. Technically it's the PIC's job to make sure passengers are paying attention to the safety briefing before every flight, and as for takeoff and landing, it's best not to have loose, heavy, metal objects flying around if there's some turbulence." How's that for business politics? A rule in place for a federal aviation regulation, for liability concerns. Notice how we tell you to stow devices and enable "airplane mode" only for takeoff and landing? Notice your pilot using the in flight WiFi to stream music from his phone? Notice the tens and sometimes hundreds of mobile devices performing all sorts of wireless shenanigans during flight? Maybe they aren't so concerned with interference after all.
+Computer being a GA pilot doesn't qualify you as an expert in the field. Get over yourself. This isn't an avionics problem. It is an electronics problem. Electromagnetic interference can occur from just about anything. Shielding has helped to reduce this issue in recent years. +Pigmoon K the DVD player gives off EMR and that can affect an electronic device. What the DVD player did was interfere with the VOR receiver (they aren't talking GPS here). In RF, the more powerful signal wins. Attenuation by distance between transmitter and receiver is what we are talking about here. The DVD player certainly wasn't producing more power than the VOR transmitter, but it was closer to the receiver, therefore it had a relative power stronger than the transmitter. Which caused the indicator to point in the opposite direction. Since antennas receive every signal regardless of frequency, it is safe to assume that either the DVD player emitted a frequency similar (doesn't have to be the exact frequency to interfere) or the receiver was overwhelmed by the relative power and couldn't differentiate the two different signals. I'm not going to assume that the FAA and PIC just want you to pay attention to the safety briefing. That's not an educated assumption. That's a GA pilot who heard something from somebody, who heard that from his friend's cousin's uncle's half-sister-in-law's (twice removed) ex-husband's high school girlfriend. (you get my point) An educated assumption is that sometimes shielding and countermeasures don't work. It's an exact science without exact results. Sometimes EMR just doesn't do what you want it to do. So many things can attenuate a signal. So it would be safe to assume that the FAA doesn't want to assume the risk of allowing frequency emitting device usage during flight. It is a "just in case" situation. I'm an explosives engineer. I deal with EMR shielding. I also evaluate and improve electronic countermeasures used in improvised explosive device interrogation. Oh and a GA pilot with IFR rating. (just in case that is the deciding factor in making this an expert opinion).
J C 14 CFR 135.117 is not an educated assumption. www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?c=ecfr&SID=03efb7c1b34301bf39ff6d98084cdd45&rgn=div8&view=text&node=14:3.0.1.1.11.2.3.34&idno=14 First off, most commercial aircraft, and ESPECIALLY airliners, do not utilize VORs for navigation, in fact the only time the word VOR is mentioned in relation to real world navigation is when you are using it as waypoint on your GPS receiver. Bearing this in mind, to suggest that they ask you to put your device into airplane mode, and then just assume you did it, in order to prevent interference with a VOR is madness. If you would just apply some critical thinking to this you would be able to avoid looking like a fool, too late for that though. If you'd refer to my previous comment I wouldn't have to repeat myself; If in fact they have this 'rule' to prevent interference with the VOR receiver they don't use or probably don't even have installed, then why would they only ask you to use airplane mode for takeoff and landing? Those are the only two phases of flight where you WOULDN'T be using your VOR receiver. Your entire comment is just one big joke.
I`m a pilot and my like is up there!!! Untill a few years ago (5 maybe) we could hear in the cockpit the cel phones looking for the network and it was VERY annoying!!! Todays main issue is only on takeoff and landings... you dont want an iphone flying in to your head!!!
@@VistaPanoramicabyLello I appreciate pilots and understand the high responsibility of their work but passengers don't have other options than sleeping or using their electronic devices during flights.
As an aircraft mechanic, i’ve been on the phone while performing some operational checks on communication and navigation equipment. No interference at all.
Yeah, but it is only your phone... Imagine 300 passengers using 300 phones at the same time during a flight... Are you sure that you are an aircraft mechanic? 🤔
@@matthewallen6875 Isn't it written on the manuals of the planes somewhere? They must be a chapter mentioning about how the phone's signal and radiowaves can interfere with the aircraft's electronic systems.
@@Google_Does_Evil_Now as far as i know the only plane you can smoke on is one you own or if the captain says you can (once the wheels leave the ground the captain is the word of god on the plane)
That DVD player was never proven to have done that. In fact, it was nothing more than a scapegoat for the plane heading in the wrong direction. It was likely caused by a careless programming error and no one caught it. They then blamed it on a DVD player to keep their jobs. Hi, I'm an electronics tech. I'm one of those experts on this matter. I have worked on Aviation Electronics equipment dating from the early 1940s all the way to the early 2000s. I have degrees in Aviation Electronics, Biomedical Electronics, and Electronics Technology. A portable DVD player can no more affect any of the systems on any plane that has ever existed than I can affect the direction of a plane with the power of my mind. It simply cannot happen. Walk into any Avionics shop where they test and calibrate Avionics and you'll see it filled with way larger machines than a DVD player and none of them are telling a plane to go in another direction (unless they are specifically designed to do so). It am really disappointed in you for not doing your homework on this. Shame! Believing that a DVD player can affect a plane? Shame on you, Linus! I've calibrated navigation and communication Avionics from periods spanning 6 decades and have done so while using my cell phone and never once have they ever had any effect on what I was doing.
Pffft. Is your name even John Smith? Perhaps you're going to tell me you have a "flight machine" too? A blue one, perhaps? With a weird shape...? You sir, seem like a liar!
@@inayaarime I know you're expecting some huge rebuttable, but honestly, if you think this video is more believable than my response, that, sir, is a whole kind of stupidity that I have no interest in trying to correct.
Nick Gregory I always make calls and watch videos and I never put my phone in airplane mode when I go on the plane I used to because if I didn't my battery would go to shit on my Galaxy note 2 but now with my Mi note 4 I have better battery life than ever
While I think it's extremely unlikely a phone could ever interfere with navigation equipment (unless held right next to an older instrument)-- cell phones (especially when receiving calls) will often introduce light interference/feedback in our headsets (sounds like stuttering over the hum of 400z 3-phase AC). I've heard this numerous times when in the cockpit, typically if I or the other pilot forget to switch to airplane mode; it has also occurred as a result of passengers leaving their phones on (I'm guessing the headset wire that plugs into the wall acts as a conductor in the presence of the phone's RF) However, it's rare that it happens and doesn't really do anything other than present a minor annoyance. The biggest reason to go to airplane mode is to prevent your battery from eating itself as it searches for a signal above 3000'. I think most of us agree though, thank God people aren't allowed to talk on their phones at altitude.
I knew I heard something somewhere about phones on planes making the pilots headsets make a vaguely irritating noise and to be honest I thought that was the only reason phone usage was banned during takeoff and landing bc. Pilots need to focus
@@theletters9623 The FAA is typically very conservative and very slow to change when it comes to rule implementation. Many regulations may appear anachronistic today and were founded to address issues that are no longer a concern; however, barring sufficient interest in and evidence supporting the regulation's removal, they remain. Considering the rapid proliferation of variable power cell phones within the public and the myriad of frequency bands that would saturate disparate aircraft designs, restricting their use was reasonable. Whether or not it's still necessary-if it ever was-it's a minor inconvenience considering the potential risks. Numerous aircraft types and vintages may comprise an individual airline's fleet, and fleet size and composition vary considerably across the nation's airlines, all of whom are subject to FAA regulation. Aircraft designed in the '70s and '80s routinely fly people across the country, employing navigation and communication equipment potentially more at risk to electromagnetic interference. Newer jets come equipped with LCDs, solid-state chips, and a modern electrical system, while older aircraft sport round-dials and CRTs, vacuum tubes, and lots of coiled copper. In a few of the planes I've flown, the automatic direction finder (ADF)-an instrument with a needle that gives your relative bearing to a radio station (NDB)-would spin in circles if you held a cell phone right next to it. While this is a clear example of interference that could certainly compromise flight safety, NDB navigation isn't used anymore in the US. However, it may still be used abroad, depending on the country and plane. As I said, the biggest issue is that your phone eats through the battery when you leave it on. Personally, I'm far more concerned with the rollout of 5G and the deleterious effects on the airlines, pilots, and the flying public. The duty and prudence of the FAA and the FCC ultimately fell apart when it comes to how they handled the implementation of 5G service and its presence near major airports. At first, I thought this was a demonstration of governmental incompetence, but now I'm suspicious that they knew what they were doing. Corruption and greed… Apparently, aviation safety matters to them until it doesn't.
My friend, Elon Musk, is already working on that, it's called: Neuralink. Your brain will literally be connected to the phone so you're never separated. Pretty trippy, but it's true.
I saw something a while ago (I can't remember where from) that said another reason to use airplane mode is because of the antenna hopping that happens when going as fast as a plane and at its altitude. Apparently the combination of the two caused phones to hop between cell antennas and cause a ton of unnecessary traffic jams, as the requests made by the phone weren't completed, as the phone was no longer in range or connected to the tower it made the request to.
My mom told me that if I kept my psp on it would be able to control the plane and I would crash and kill us all. Specifically using my game controls I never touched my psp on the plane for the rest of my childhood again... lol
Lynas, the origin of the 'no-cellphone-while-flying' rule has little to do with the avionics, which have always been well shielded against spurious radiation. The cell network, by its very nature depends on a user being able to access very few towers - the topology of the land saw to this. Radio range in the UHF bands has a lot more to do with line-of-site then power - remember your long-range wifi video. Mobile phones, especially older ones, produced a lot of power and, once airborne, could access potentially dozens of towers in metropolitan areas at the same time, tying up one particular channel over a potentially large area. Modern phones use lower power and spread-spectrum technology to mitigate these issues, hence the relaxation of the rules in Europe..
Also, there are absolutely zero bands in common between HF, VHF, UHF, SATCOM, ILS, etc and cell phones. Avionics are shielded. In fact, ALL electrical aircraft systems that are flight-critical are shielded...
I've been leaving on my cell phones in planes since 2010 to present day, and all the flights were safe and landed in the correct airports. I played games or took pictures, so I can say those 2 things does not interfere with airplane communications.
don't you know that was really just covert racism? 'certain people' that talk on their phones extremely loud (yet will yell at anyone who makes a comment indicating they overheard them-which everyone within 50 feet did). So Pai bans phone calls on planes. Surprised no news groups jumped on that
The Rikmeister I think a lot of people didn't want to hear other people talking loudly on their phones in a place where you can't just get up and walk away. Ajit is seemingly listening to the consumer complaints here. Although why they don't allow data usage, that's probably him getting bribed by a cushy exec job at an airline I'm sure.
Some guy: Hey, I really hate EA for that battlefront 2 fiasco and pay to win. *Looks at credit card reader attached to lavatory door* guy:Oooookay, never mind.
According to my mother public bathrooms at some public places used to have coin slots. This was however done away with as preventing people from using the bathroom isn't really a good thing, for you or for them.
@@danielmallory4687 It certainly can be. But most politicians aren't very logical. They're more into knee-jerk feel-good legislation that does nothing.
@@CharlieMikeNS could be good though cause you dont want to be distracted in case of a plane crash which happens at takeoff, landing, and maybe even cruise, ofc you will be startled and will stop using your electronic device during a crash, but every second counts in an emergency.
3:53,that's not true! I live in Austria, and when I flew from Romania (Bucharest) to Austria (Vienna), we were allowed to use our phones BUT ALLWAYS ENABLE AIRPLANE MODE. In the mid of the flight, people were using their mobile phones, with Bluetooth headphones and stuff like this. A stuardize came to us and told us to SHUT DOWN ALL ELECTRONIC DEVICES because the autopilot wasn't working properly. Yeah, we tuned of all devices and we landed properly.
The airline I usually fly has a rule of only turning on airplane mode during taxi/take-off and landing but im mid flight we can have it off. And theres in-flight wifi and we can call anytime. This airline takes round trips almost everywhere in US and Asia, it's US and Taiwan based. The airline is called EVA Airways. They are the 3rd safest airline amd never had a single crash or emergency landing since the airline's first flight, AVOD System is the newest system also the same as British Airways Newest AVOD and Asiana Airlines's. In conclusion, If you're going to US or Asia I'd recommend EVA
Neil Grace is one of the few bureaucrats that I will remember for having brought about good things, I absolutely despise noise and one of the greatest things about airplanes is the amazing silence, despite having quite a few people around. Thank you very much Neil!
To my consideration an I-Phone or some else device is useable in an air-plane and has no effect on the plane-technology but I am not for sure if this is the same with many of them, thanks and kind regards.
True. I agree with that. A plane is too confined for multiple people yapping around with their phones. Silence is needed during this circumstances and don't get me started when a baby starts crying on a 15 hour flight for 2 hours straight on a repetitive basis.
megalith But that doesn't explain why data use is banned as well, especially since the EU allows it. Lobbying sounds like the most plausible explanation in my opinion
megalith Lol, a baby was crying the whole flight two hours straight. The flight attendants even needed to help to make the baby more relaxed... That Mom doesn't fucking now how to feed a baby...
Working in aviation and having friends in the mobile career, as well as working in it myself, what i have heard is that the required power and data needed to send the signals up to reach you in the sky would severely hurt all those on the ground. There are many more people on the ground than in the sky and so you favor to the masses. Now if you were to say yes it is fine to use it in flight, people would then see a no signal and be mad, thus demanding one from their carriers during flight so that they didn't have to pay for the in-flight WiFi. Thus begins the cycle and a huge money pit for carriers to have to build towers to direct the signal up into wasted space so that the occasional plane flying over can get cellular signal for an hour or two until it is out of the tower's range.
Tejas Karande you cannot call in a plane because radio waves can disturb the plane instruments even if they are protected its really just a precaution. you can still listen to music and watch videos because you are not emiting radio waves
Taco Squad yes I know I watched it but I talked to some pilots in the military and they say its just a precaution newer planes should be protected. basicly its just in case
It may be normal to use your phone (with airplane mode on) in the North American and European areas, but every time I take a flight in China, the flight attendants always tell me to turn off my phone even after reaching cruising altitude. I tell the FA that my phone is on airplane mode, yet they would still not allow me to use it. -_-
I heard somewhere that it caused problems with the broadcasting towers or something, because you'd switch too fast from tower to tower. I didn't fact check though.
Never used it though I may have to check it out, but c'mon man it's a one off payment of $14 :') Open source is only good because it's free and a large number of people can work together to improve it, it is so vulnerable to malicious interference though, so that extra $14 for piece of mind is actually fantastic for the consumer
The hand-off of cellular handsets traveling across cellular node coverage areas takes a bit of network resources on cellular providers hardware. Every so often you may notice the cell network being over crowded and become temporarily unavailable, like at a concert or huge event (4th of July in the city, etc). For rural areas where cellular infrastructures are not built to accommodate so many users, a large low altitude plane full of cell phones traveling the entire distance of the country could effect these rural communities by jamming a network and interfering with potential 911 requests.
Bro I agree with the guy that talked "a moment of peace" , Im not the kind of guy that talks on for hours on the phone... but I do know people that do this even at work whenever they have the chance... talking and talking and talking, all kind of stuff, sometimes laughing loud and so on. I can see how this could get very annoying on planes.... hell ride with some crazed phone person.
Adrian A Ageed, while it'd be nice to use my cellphone to make a call and tell people on other end of flight whether I'll be arriving on time, I don't want to listen to a bunch of chatty teenage girls yamnering on about nothing, or some bored businessman talking to his office about his sales presentation.
But were talking about data transmission. This stops people from browsing the internet and watching Netflix with headphones on as well. Besides, if it was purely a pleasantry thing, it's up to the airlines to ban it, not the FCC.
I was told by a pilot once that the Sprint push to talk features from the early 2000s actually registered a small beep I'm pilot headphones when transmissions we're sent/received. I guess it was similar to the noise you hear from your computer speakers when you receive a text message on an og tracphone sitting nearby.
Actually, in earlier days it would have not worked even if allowed. A friend of me tried to use his mobile phone in his glider back in the 90s. The problem was that at 2000m altitude, the phone saw so many towers, and couldn't lock to one. Also image flying at 10000m, you are well out of range of 7 km for GSM network. Also the plane is a faraday cage.
This is something I expected to see in the video. I remember some old Reddit post about how phone companies had cell phone usage blocked on planes because they would cause significant problems with the cell towers, and it makes perfect sense.
it works for me when i jam my phone between the window and window shade with personal hotspot active though i have to sit in a very specific row for it to work properly (usually the row just infront of the wing so the signal will bounce off the leading edge of the wing and into the window) i can get relatively good data speeds at 37000ft when the plane flies within 20km a tower (the towers in my country all use high power transmitters in the outback) i even had an online game of inflight CSGO and won (though it was pretty laggy)
wow, I knew there was no risk but my mom yelled at me when she saw me using my data, I’m about to send her this video Edit, I was using headphones (not that headphones make a difference since planes are loud) and my brightness was all the way down facing away from her.
As a pilot that flys a small plane I can say they do affect the radios. When my passengers forget to turn there phones to airplane mode you'll hear a clicking on the radio when they are getting a text or a call.
banning the use of mobile devices even for the sake of quiet in the cabin is fine. what isn't is the flight attendant pestering me to stop using my phone saying phones have to be off, airplane mode doesn't cut it.
@@KaisTheFireWarrior laptops are allowed so your understanding is wrong. flight attendants simply like to show that bit of authority they have over the customer cause you don't get to boss a customer around doing any other service work.
The other reason why you can't play youtube, or anything else that need internet connection from your electronic devices, such as phone is just because... there is no connection in the plane. The plane is too fast that your provider can't handle it.
In the US we still have to turn off cell phone and devices until they get to a certain altitude which I think is 10000 ft. Also applies to coming in for a landing. I think this is more for cell phone triggered bombs than interfering with flight systems, since most cell phones will stop working close to 10,000 feet or above. The FCC has watched too many mission impossible movies LOL
i never thought of this until now but id fucking hate to be on a plane with someone talking the whole fucking time on their phone and im sitting next to them or something.
They told me to turn off my Gameboy, I wasn't at a save point.
F
F
Then I just turned down the brightness to pretend it lel
F
F
"Enjoy a moment a quiet at 30,000 feet" with a random baby crying out loud because his ears hurt.
Even without baby it is very loud in the plane during the fliight
Only Ajit Pai would give that as a reasoning. Total piece of shit
Yeah, babies suck, why are people still making more people?
@@andreisuvorkov2023 yeah but continuous monotonous noise will he ignored by your brain after a few moments
@@clarkevander tinitus: iam a joke to you
**Turns on airplane mode**
My iphone shall no longer bring death to airplanes.
@ɲƹǿȿȼǿřρɨǿɲ
Just your wallet.
It still will on a 737 max 🤣
@@tigermaster1784 , Oi, the 737 max(s) could’ve been saved so easily, just do the trim cutout! It’s two damn switches!
Anytime he says FCC, I think about "Without Me" by Eminem
trueeeee lol
The FCC wont let me be, so let me be me...
and let me see,
they tried to shut me down on MTV
but it feels so empty without me
So come on hit,
Bum on your lips.
So does he
"Why you can't use phones on planes"
man i cant even afford their wifi to use my phone
CriticLX u spelled access wrong lolel
@@waekn geteyefo
@@waekn my bad lmao
Never been in a plane with wifi tbf
@@rubenjanse3065 me neither
Mobile devices do not cause any interference whatsoever with avionics on an aircraft. In fact, it's illegal to manufacture and sell a mobile device that even has he ability to operate on certain frequencies.
The reason they tell you to stow and turn off your mobile devices for takeoff and landing is because of legal reasons regarding safety and liability. Technically it's the PIC's job to make sure passengers are paying attention to the safety briefing before every flight, and as for takeoff and landing, it's best not to have loose, heavy, metal objects flying around if there's some turbulence.
Your pilot has a tablet and a smartphone in the cockpit with him, and neither are on airplane mode.
Computer ii
Chris Shihadeh
I'm not sure that you know enough about this to be speaking about it. I'm a pilot myself, I just explained to you why that rule exists.
Also please explain what "a flight system" is, you're sounding like the current president when he talks about "nuclear weapons and things". Do you just improvise as you go?
Chris Shihadeh
It's almost laughable how ignorant you are, but it's too sad to laugh at.
"...is because of legal reasons regarding safety and liability. Technically it's the PIC's job to make sure passengers are paying attention to the safety briefing before every flight, and as for takeoff and landing, it's best not to have loose, heavy, metal objects flying around if there's some turbulence."
How's that for business politics? A rule in place for a federal aviation regulation, for liability concerns. Notice how we tell you to stow devices and enable "airplane mode" only for takeoff and landing? Notice your pilot using the in flight WiFi to stream music from his phone? Notice the tens and sometimes hundreds of mobile devices performing all sorts of wireless shenanigans during flight?
Maybe they aren't so concerned with interference after all.
+Computer being a GA pilot doesn't qualify you as an expert in the field. Get over yourself. This isn't an avionics problem. It is an electronics problem.
Electromagnetic interference can occur from just about anything. Shielding has helped to reduce this issue in recent years.
+Pigmoon K the DVD player gives off EMR and that can affect an electronic device. What the DVD player did was interfere with the VOR receiver (they aren't talking GPS here). In RF, the more powerful signal wins. Attenuation by distance between transmitter and receiver is what we are talking about here. The DVD player certainly wasn't producing more power than the VOR transmitter, but it was closer to the receiver, therefore it had a relative power stronger than the transmitter. Which caused the indicator to point in the opposite direction. Since antennas receive every signal regardless of frequency, it is safe to assume that either the DVD player emitted a frequency similar (doesn't have to be the exact frequency to interfere) or the receiver was overwhelmed by the relative power and couldn't differentiate the two different signals.
I'm not going to assume that the FAA and PIC just want you to pay attention to the safety briefing. That's not an educated assumption. That's a GA pilot who heard something from somebody, who heard that from his friend's cousin's uncle's half-sister-in-law's (twice removed) ex-husband's high school girlfriend. (you get my point)
An educated assumption is that sometimes shielding and countermeasures don't work. It's an exact science without exact results. Sometimes EMR just doesn't do what you want it to do. So many things can attenuate a signal. So it would be safe to assume that the FAA doesn't want to assume the risk of allowing frequency emitting device usage during flight. It is a "just in case" situation.
I'm an explosives engineer. I deal with EMR shielding. I also evaluate and improve electronic countermeasures used in improvised explosive device interrogation.
Oh and a GA pilot with IFR rating. (just in case that is the deciding factor in making this an expert opinion).
J C
14 CFR 135.117 is not an educated assumption.
www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?c=ecfr&SID=03efb7c1b34301bf39ff6d98084cdd45&rgn=div8&view=text&node=14:3.0.1.1.11.2.3.34&idno=14
First off, most commercial aircraft, and ESPECIALLY airliners, do not utilize VORs for navigation, in fact the only time the word VOR is mentioned in relation to real world navigation is when you are using it as waypoint on your GPS receiver. Bearing this in mind, to suggest that they ask you to put your device into airplane mode, and then just assume you did it, in order to prevent interference with a VOR is madness.
If you would just apply some critical thinking to this you would be able to avoid looking like a fool, too late for that though. If you'd refer to my previous comment I wouldn't have to repeat myself; If in fact they have this 'rule' to prevent interference with the VOR receiver they don't use or probably don't even have installed, then why would they only ask you to use airplane mode for takeoff and landing? Those are the only two phases of flight where you WOULDN'T be using your VOR receiver. Your entire comment is just one big joke.
The 1.9K dislikes are from Airplanes pilot
I`m a pilot and my like is up there!!!
Untill a few years ago (5 maybe) we could hear in the cockpit the cel phones looking for the network and it was VERY annoying!!! Todays main issue is only on takeoff and landings... you dont want an iphone flying in to your head!!!
Another issue was... "no one could certify that there would be no problems and in aviation if you have doubts is better to simply ban it!!!
@@VistaPanoramicabyLello I appreciate pilots and understand the high responsibility of their work but passengers don't have other options than sleeping or using their electronic devices during flights.
InfiniteGamer 4307 red Barton Intensifies
1.3k now hahaha
As an aircraft mechanic, i’ve been on the phone while performing some operational checks on communication and navigation equipment. No interference at all.
Yeah, but it is only your phone... Imagine 300 passengers using 300 phones at the same time during a flight... Are you sure that you are an aircraft mechanic? 🤔
@@Nemesis2446 that would be a question for a pilot i suppose. but i’ve been an aircraft mechanic for 7 years.
@@matthewallen6875 Isn't it written on the manuals of the planes somewhere? They must be a chapter mentioning about how the phone's signal and radiowaves can interfere with the aircraft's electronic systems.
@@Nemesis2446 yeah but it’s referring to super old phones that needed much more powerful signals. modern cell phones don’t interfere
No smoking signs all over the plane
Ashtray in lavatory
Kevin Lu it’s when some passenger brings a cigarette
Seems legit
if someone is going to break the rules and spark one up in the shitter
its better that they butt it out in the ashtray rather than in the bin
Kevin Lu All seats used to have ashtrays. Flying on a smoke filled plane used to be a thing. Is it legal anywhere in the world now?
@@Google_Does_Evil_Now as far as i know the only plane you can smoke on is one you own or if the captain says you can (once the wheels leave the ground the captain is the word of god on the plane)
I put my phone in airplane mode,
I threw it,
It didnt fly..
alikedeegan underrated comment
Lol
How original.
alikedeegan That joke is older than you fuckface shut the fuck up you unfunny disgrace
You forgot to turn on airplane mode!!
I wait you already did.
Yeah I can’t fix it sorry.
That DVD player was never proven to have done that. In fact, it was nothing more than a scapegoat for the plane heading in the wrong direction. It was likely caused by a careless programming error and no one caught it. They then blamed it on a DVD player to keep their jobs.
Hi, I'm an electronics tech. I'm one of those experts on this matter. I have worked on Aviation Electronics equipment dating from the early 1940s all the way to the early 2000s. I have degrees in Aviation Electronics, Biomedical Electronics, and Electronics Technology. A portable DVD player can no more affect any of the systems on any plane that has ever existed than I can affect the direction of a plane with the power of my mind. It simply cannot happen. Walk into any Avionics shop where they test and calibrate Avionics and you'll see it filled with way larger machines than a DVD player and none of them are telling a plane to go in another direction (unless they are specifically designed to do so).
It am really disappointed in you for not doing your homework on this. Shame! Believing that a DVD player can affect a plane? Shame on you, Linus! I've calibrated navigation and communication Avionics from periods spanning 6 decades and have done so while using my cell phone and never once have they ever had any effect on what I was doing.
Nice
Yeah, first vid I've watched of his, and he doesn't sound like he actually knows what he's talking about.
Glad someone here does. Cheers.
I didn't bother to read that
Pffft. Is your name even John Smith? Perhaps you're going to tell me you have a "flight machine" too? A blue one, perhaps? With a weird shape...? You sir, seem like a liar!
@@inayaarime
I know you're expecting some huge rebuttable, but honestly, if you think this video is more believable than my response, that, sir, is a whole kind of stupidity that I have no interest in trying to correct.
1:12 holy that voice crack might bring down a plane tho
LoL
ha
If that doesn't, that fact that this man is married will
Lul
@@marquisethomas5611 He's a millionaire, that's enough for most women to ignore his squeaky voice.
An iphone wont bring down a 737.
But a 737max will
they would bring each other down
@@shaansingh6048 LOL, i understood the reference.
MCAS will
Shaan Singh wouldnt be so sure. If they couldnt position the engine correctly, how do you now the TCAS is installed propertly
Or a building
2:55 who have that many unchecked emails? like for real, 32 512?
Nikola Obradovic He's a CEO of a company, most higher ups in companies have thousands of unreads
I have nearly 5000 unchecked on my iPhone, mainly because I dont know how to uncheck and I hardly use the phone
I currently have 33031, not including work email.
Nikola Obradovic Most of that shit is garbage.
My old man has 43000..
Airplane mode on my old phone only blocked calls, but not wifi, bluetooth or anything else
Stupid
@@Paul-ir8lt But real
@@f8_prez I had samsung galaxy a3,what you?
That's true on my iPad Pro as well as my phone. Airplane mode only blocks cellular calls and data
Me too!
2:39 Set flaps to-
Wait did I leave the oven on?
lol
Should have been "Shit, did I leave the stove on?"
Hilarious deadpool reference.
I remember they tested this on Mythbusters and found that it's pure bullshit.
Nick Gregory I remember when mythbusters existed.
lol
Triston Sistare 😭😭😥
Nick Gregory it’s not interference with the avionics, it’s when the object becomes a safety hazard on the flight is when it becomes e a problem.
Nick Gregory I always make calls and watch videos and I never put my phone in airplane mode when I go on the plane I used to because if I didn't my battery would go to shit on my Galaxy note 2 but now with my Mi note 4 I have better battery life than ever
While I think it's extremely unlikely a phone could ever interfere with navigation equipment (unless held right next to an older instrument)-- cell phones (especially when receiving calls) will often introduce light interference/feedback in our headsets (sounds like stuttering over the hum of 400z 3-phase AC). I've heard this numerous times when in the cockpit, typically if I or the other pilot forget to switch to airplane mode; it has also occurred as a result of passengers leaving their phones on (I'm guessing the headset wire that plugs into the wall acts as a conductor in the presence of the phone's RF) However, it's rare that it happens and doesn't really do anything other than present a minor annoyance.
The biggest reason to go to airplane mode is to prevent your battery from eating itself as it searches for a signal above 3000'.
I think most of us agree though, thank God people aren't allowed to talk on their phones at altitude.
I knew I heard something somewhere about phones on planes making the pilots headsets make a vaguely irritating noise and to be honest I thought that was the only reason phone usage was banned during takeoff and landing bc. Pilots need to focus
@@theletters9623
The FAA is typically very conservative and very slow to change when it comes to rule implementation. Many regulations may appear anachronistic today and were founded to address issues that are no longer a concern; however, barring sufficient interest in and evidence supporting the regulation's removal, they remain.
Considering the rapid proliferation of variable power cell phones within the public and the myriad of frequency bands that would saturate disparate aircraft designs, restricting their use was reasonable. Whether or not it's still necessary-if it ever was-it's a minor inconvenience considering the potential risks.
Numerous aircraft types and vintages may comprise an individual airline's fleet, and fleet size and composition vary considerably across the nation's airlines, all of whom are subject to FAA regulation. Aircraft designed in the '70s and '80s routinely fly people across the country, employing navigation and communication equipment potentially more at risk to electromagnetic interference.
Newer jets come equipped with LCDs, solid-state chips, and a modern electrical system, while older aircraft sport round-dials and CRTs, vacuum tubes, and lots of coiled copper.
In a few of the planes I've flown, the automatic direction finder (ADF)-an instrument with a needle that gives your relative bearing to a radio station (NDB)-would spin in circles if you held a cell phone right next to it. While this is a clear example of interference that could certainly compromise flight safety, NDB navigation isn't used anymore in the US. However, it may still be used abroad, depending on the country and plane.
As I said, the biggest issue is that your phone eats through the battery when you leave it on.
Personally, I'm far more concerned with the rollout of 5G and the deleterious effects on the airlines, pilots, and the flying public. The duty and prudence of the FAA and the FCC ultimately fell apart when it comes to how they handled the implementation of 5G service and its presence near major airports. At first, I thought this was a demonstration of governmental incompetence, but now I'm suspicious that they knew what they were doing. Corruption and greed… Apparently, aviation safety matters to them until it doesn't.
We need a REAL airplane mode for our phones.... You know! The one that can fly and follow me around!
😂😂attach your phone to drone, and you're done 😂😂
And someone can just snatch while it’s in the air
Yea
Ok Boomer
My friend, Elon Musk, is already working on that, it's called: Neuralink.
Your brain will literally be connected to the phone so you're never separated.
Pretty trippy, but it's true.
I saw something a while ago (I can't remember where from) that said another reason to use airplane mode is because of the antenna hopping that happens when going as fast as a plane and at its altitude. Apparently the combination of the two caused phones to hop between cell antennas and cause a ton of unnecessary traffic jams, as the requests made by the phone weren't completed, as the phone was no longer in range or connected to the tower it made the request to.
all of a sudden the driver hears hentai
miraicoder ecchi
miraicoder pilot*
miraicoder Driver......right. And the pilot wouldn't hear peoples devices from the cock pit.
Kadomex i ment pilot smh
And suddenly the word "cockpit" got a whole new meaning.
$20 a minute for a call! Rather use 2 cans and a longgggg string.
Hang that up from newyork to oregon probably a few K but bam u got a cell service😂😂😂
Gamer 101 XD
Linus: “The FCC”
Me: “Wont let me be”
I'm the single one who use airplane mode to stop getting calls??😂
no you aren't
Lol
Alexandru BOSS RO then how do u use wifi cause airplane mode turns of wifi
Do not disturb is a thing
Th3Common Kid you can use wifi and airplane mode
My mom told me that if I kept my psp on it would be able to control the plane and I would crash and kill us all. Specifically using my game controls
I never touched my psp on the plane for the rest of my childhood again... lol
xD
Sicc game bro
Sounds like something from Surf Ninjas
Shes saying the frickin parent lies again
Sounds like you were tapping too loud and she got irritated😭
"AIRPLANES ARE MAGIC!"
- That hostess in College Humor episode
Lynas, the origin of the 'no-cellphone-while-flying' rule has little to do with the avionics, which have always been well shielded against spurious radiation. The cell network, by its very nature depends on a user being able to access very few towers - the topology of the land saw to this. Radio range in the UHF bands has a lot more to do with line-of-site then power - remember your long-range wifi video. Mobile phones, especially older ones, produced a lot of power and, once airborne, could access potentially dozens of towers in metropolitan areas at the same time, tying up one particular channel over a potentially large area. Modern phones use lower power and spread-spectrum technology to mitigate these issues, hence the relaxation of the rules in Europe..
Just saying, I'm pretty sure its Linus, not Lynas bro
Also, there are absolutely zero bands in common between HF, VHF, UHF, SATCOM, ILS, etc and cell phones. Avionics are shielded. In fact, ALL electrical aircraft systems that are flight-critical are shielded...
watching this while i’m in the plane.. ✈️
nooo lmao
It would be funny if you didnt finish the sentence on purpose
Same
Same
And this is the last we have heard from simplyskye
just use air plane mode
Boxish yes
Ahmad Alturki i used the air plane mode. but my phone didnt fly...
Eyezzzonly Did you try to turn it off and turn it back on?
+Ahmad Alturki thanks, I only watch youtube videos in air plane mode
LOL
I've been leaving on my cell phones in planes since 2010 to present day, and all the flights were safe and landed in the correct airports. I played games or took pictures, so I can say those 2 things does not interfere with airplane communications.
I believe it's just online interactions,this is why airplane mode exists
First recorded stupidity of Ajit Pai before net neutrality argument?
Confirmation that Ajit Pai is a fucking troll.
don't you know that was really just covert racism? 'certain people' that talk on their phones extremely loud (yet will yell at anyone who makes a comment indicating they overheard them-which everyone within 50 feet did). So Pai bans phone calls on planes. Surprised no news groups jumped on that
He was not in charge of it. Also the moment of quite is under rated
The Rikmeister I think a lot of people didn't want to hear other people talking loudly on their phones in a place where you can't just get up and walk away. Ajit is seemingly listening to the consumer complaints here. Although why they don't allow data usage, that's probably him getting bribed by a cushy exec job at an airline I'm sure.
He just wanted to get in front of the shit storm he would unleash for fucking over net neutrality.
Because that was the only thing he was hired for.
Some guy: Hey, I really hate EA for that battlefront 2 fiasco and pay to win.
*Looks at credit card reader attached to lavatory door*
guy:Oooookay, never mind.
Theres a credit card reader on the lavatory door?
Nothing a swift kick wouldn't solve.
According to my mother public bathrooms at some public places used to have coin slots.
This was however done away with as preventing people from using the bathroom isn't really a good thing, for you or for them.
So many stupid laws are passed over "concerns" and not scientific research and fact.
In all fairness science study can be biased or misunderstood so using logic is helpful
@@danielmallory4687 It certainly can be. But most politicians aren't very logical. They're more into knee-jerk feel-good legislation that does nothing.
@@CharlieMikeNS fair enough
true
@@CharlieMikeNS could be good though cause you dont want to be distracted in case of a plane crash which happens at takeoff, landing, and maybe even cruise,
ofc you will be startled and will stop using your electronic device during a crash, but every second counts in an emergency.
1:11 nice voicecrack
0:33 I failed that class tho...
3:53,that's not true!
I live in Austria, and when I flew from Romania (Bucharest) to Austria (Vienna), we were allowed to use our phones BUT ALLWAYS ENABLE AIRPLANE MODE. In the mid of the flight, people were using their mobile phones, with Bluetooth headphones and stuff like this. A stuardize came to us and told us to SHUT DOWN ALL ELECTRONIC DEVICES because the autopilot wasn't working properly. Yeah, we tuned of all devices and we landed properly.
The airline I usually fly has a rule of only turning on airplane mode during taxi/take-off and landing but im mid flight we can have it off. And theres in-flight wifi and we can call anytime. This airline takes round trips almost everywhere in US and Asia, it's US and Taiwan based. The airline is called EVA Airways. They are the 3rd safest airline amd never had a single crash or emergency landing since the airline's first flight, AVOD System is the newest system also the same as British Airways Newest AVOD and Asiana Airlines's. In conclusion, If you're going to US or Asia I'd recommend EVA
Well I carry my 20tb porn collection with me on a hard drive so I'm good
Only 20 terabytes? Casual.
flameshana9 i have 20 peta bytes
What your device that carry 20tb?
69 likes jeez
Never understood why would someone want to have porn collection, I never fap twice to the same video.
Just watch The Simpsons... "Turn it on! turn it ON!!!"
Accuweather
Accuwether
So one thing to keep in mind. You aint getting internet up there anyway, as you thousands and thousands of feet away from a Cell Tower.
Good to know...
3:48
Ajit Pai using flawless logic as always
Once I was on a boat with a walker talkie and I some how got on the captain’s frequency.
Russian Trex lol
Russian Trex WOW lmao
Walkie*
lol
Lmao
Phones are much too disturbing on the plane but the baby screaming to your right is just fine
Neil Grace is one of the few bureaucrats that I will remember for having brought about good things, I absolutely despise noise and one of the greatest things about airplanes is the amazing silence, despite having quite a few people around. Thank you very much Neil!
4:33 shhhh Linus don’t give them ideas
😆
4:30 Yeah fuck that, if I had to pay to use the restroom, I'd rather just take a shit right in front of the door.
lol
Vandalozi O Damn, death by shit
What a way to die.
vgamesx1 do it and make the CEO eat it
These comments made my day
That net neutrality being hampered would kill a business overnight
pretty sure thats been a lie for the last decade. ive left my phone on fully every flight ive been on
To my consideration an I-Phone or some else device is useable in an air-plane and has no effect on the plane-technology but I am not for sure if this is the same with many of them, thanks and kind regards.
Nomercy 661 Because Planes use RNAV (GPS, INS, IRS, RNP) instead of Tradition Radio Navigation (VOR, DME, NDB).
@@abbysnowmist da fuk
*Engine gets lit on fire*
Me who forgot to turn on airplane mode
True. I agree with that. A plane is too confined for multiple people yapping around with their phones. Silence is needed during this circumstances and don't get me started when a baby starts crying on a 15 hour flight for 2 hours straight on a repetitive basis.
megalith But that doesn't explain why data use is banned as well, especially since the EU allows it. Lobbying sounds like the most plausible explanation in my opinion
Yacob Gugsa: Neither does it explain why some flights have telephones which you can pay for (albeit at extortionate prices).
Call it a necessary extortion. The lesser people would want to use it the better.
megalith I think babies instead of having half the price of the ticket they should have twice the price for annoying other passengers
megalith Lol, a baby was crying the whole flight two hours straight. The flight attendants even needed to help to make the baby more relaxed...
That Mom doesn't fucking now how to feed a baby...
Working in aviation and having friends in the mobile career, as well as working in it myself, what i have heard is that the required power and data needed to send the signals up to reach you in the sky would severely hurt all those on the ground. There are many more people on the ground than in the sky and so you favor to the masses. Now if you were to say yes it is fine to use it in flight, people would then see a no signal and be mad, thus demanding one from their carriers during flight so that they didn't have to pay for the in-flight WiFi. Thus begins the cycle and a huge money pit for carriers to have to build towers to direct the signal up into wasted space so that the occasional plane flying over can get cellular signal for an hour or two until it is out of the tower's range.
We can use phones on planes to listen to music and watch videos. 😉
Tejas Karande you cannot call in a plane because radio waves can disturb the plane instruments even if they are protected its really just a precaution. you can still listen to music and watch videos because you are not emiting radio waves
Taco Squad can you be more precise please
+ Myron Kidswatter so we can watch porn
Myron Kidswatter there is a whole myth busters episode on how phones has zero effect on planes instruments
Taco Squad yes I know I watched it but I talked to some pilots in the military and they say its just a precaution newer planes should be protected. basicly its just in case
“Did I leave oven on”
Lol
I use a cassette player on planes, just to be safe!
Calling a ‘Seven Eight Seven’ a “Seven EIGHTY Seven” is a sim that can’t be ignored
It may be normal to use your phone (with airplane mode on) in the North American and European areas, but every time I take a flight in China, the flight attendants always tell me to turn off my phone even after reaching cruising altitude. I tell the FA that my phone is on airplane mode, yet they would still not allow me to use it. -_-
Weird, do you know if they're wrong or is it part of the law to ban all usage?
Watching while I am taking off
Such a rebel
make video on how wikipedia works?
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia
wikipedia-ception
I heard somewhere that it caused problems with the broadcasting towers or something, because you'd switch too fast from tower to tower. I didn't fact check though.
I feel good for living in Europe
Ok well good and that's it???
DavieJones1111 ME TOO
Me 2
Europe is the best.
You really want to have that phone call while on flight ? lol
Oh no, he said “Tarmac.” My love of aviation and technology are now conflicted.
U Can’t Have My Name I got so triggered at that
2:19 Someone downloaded some stock photo from shutterstock for this Techquickie episode.
Airplain attendant: Please turn off all devices
Everyone: No.
Plane: *crashing*
"Sorry, accidentally turned off airplane mode on my 3ds"
I don’t think airplane mode was on the 3ds...
@@itztoru330 it was
"Synergy doesn't do that!" . . . Thumbs up if you remember when Synergy was free and open source.
Never used it though I may have to check it out, but c'mon man it's a one off payment of $14 :') Open source is only good because it's free and a large number of people can work together to improve it, it is so vulnerable to malicious interference though, so that extra $14 for piece of mind is actually fantastic for the consumer
@@freakaknight Open Source is more secure, not less. Anyone can contribute; doesn't mean every change makes it in.
@@freakaknight It's not just about open source or being free of charge, it's about being free as in freedom. Look up "free software"
4:35 SHHH! Don't give them any ideas!
In the back of Southwest and American way magazine it clearly says: ‘Please do not use galaxy Note 7 on aircraft’ or something similar.
because it's explosive XD
Lol
When i went on holiday British Airways has a Wi-Fi thingy, so we could use our phones.
3:47 what happened 😂😂
He said because the quote
I am about to fly in 5 hours!😂
Junior Cyclist You good?
Jake hope so
u Alive?
Guys, i dont think junior cyclist made it. No answer was given. R.I.P junior cyclist
Junior Cyclist Aye man you good boi?
The hand-off of cellular handsets traveling across cellular node coverage areas takes a bit of network resources on cellular providers hardware.
Every so often you may notice the cell network being over crowded and become temporarily unavailable, like at a concert or huge event (4th of July in the city, etc).
For rural areas where cellular infrastructures are not built to accommodate so many users, a large low altitude plane full of cell phones traveling the entire distance of the country could effect these rural communities by jamming a network and interfering with potential 911 requests.
That was a pretty damn good video, guys!
3:41 "In April, 2017"
Well... Then it must be an April Fools Prank... LOL
Almost 2 years ago I was in a plane, listening to music with bluetooth headphones and was told bluetooth devices were not allowed to function :/
How come phones worked on the hijacked 911 phones in 2001 but they do not have any signals in modern days.
He talks rather slower than he used to in the older videos. I'm glad cause I can digest what he says much quickly and easier
Bro I agree with the guy that talked "a moment of peace" , Im not the kind of guy that talks on for hours on the phone... but I do know people that do this even at work whenever they have the chance... talking and talking and talking, all kind of stuff, sometimes laughing loud and so on. I can see how this could get very annoying on planes.... hell ride with some crazed phone person.
Adrian A Ageed, while it'd be nice to use my cellphone to make a call and tell people on other end of flight whether I'll be arriving on time, I don't want to listen to a bunch of chatty teenage girls yamnering on about nothing, or some bored businessman talking to his office about his sales presentation.
But were talking about data transmission. This stops people from browsing the internet and watching Netflix with headphones on as well. Besides, if it was purely a pleasantry thing, it's up to the airlines to ban it, not the FCC.
Having the 4G data enaled will not bring down an airplane
*5G: hold my beer*
Hilarious
I was told by a pilot once that the Sprint push to talk features from the early 2000s actually registered a small beep I'm pilot headphones when transmissions we're sent/received. I guess it was similar to the noise you hear from your computer speakers when you receive a text message on an og tracphone sitting nearby.
Actually, in earlier days it would have not worked even if allowed. A friend of me tried to use his mobile phone in his glider back in the 90s. The problem was that at 2000m altitude, the phone saw so many towers, and couldn't lock to one. Also image flying at 10000m, you are well out of range of 7 km for GSM network. Also the plane is a faraday cage.
This is something I expected to see in the video. I remember some old Reddit post about how phone companies had cell phone usage blocked on planes because they would cause significant problems with the cell towers, and it makes perfect sense.
@@flak4438 Yeah. I'm surprised that this important fact didn't make it into the video.
it works for me when i jam my phone between the window and window shade with personal hotspot active
though i have to sit in a very specific row for it to work properly (usually the row just infront of the wing so the signal will bounce off the leading edge of the wing and into the window)
i can get relatively good data speeds at 37000ft when the plane flies within 20km a tower (the towers in my country all use high power transmitters in the outback)
i even had an online game of inflight CSGO and won (though it was pretty laggy)
Epic Terrorrist attack
Use the phone
API as quick as possible
“ it’s like freaking magic” I died when he said that shit. Just the way he said it was hilarious.
I’m watching this on a plane right now to Adelaide soo
O_O
wow, I knew there was no risk but my mom yelled at me when she saw me using my data, I’m about to send her this video
Edit, I was using headphones (not that headphones make a difference since planes are loud) and my brightness was all the way down facing away from her.
cellphones did 9/11
A nokia sliced through the steel beams
the explosives where used was a Samsung
CALL 9/11 !!!
note 7s melt steel beams
_puts phone into aeroplane mode and points it at tower_
>:3
1:39 - Beautiful
As a pilot that flys a small plane I can say they do affect the radios. When my passengers forget to turn there phones to airplane mode you'll hear a clicking on the radio when they are getting a text or a call.
banning the use of mobile devices even for the sake of quiet in the cabin is fine. what isn't is the flight attendant pestering me to stop using my phone saying phones have to be off, airplane mode doesn't cut it.
alvachan88 actually it's electronic devices not just phones
@@KaisTheFireWarrior
laptops are allowed so your understanding is wrong. flight attendants simply like to show that bit of authority they have over the customer cause you don't get to boss a customer around doing any other service work.
In other words when it comes to airlines they determine what is acceptable, it's definitely not because the flight attendants want authority
I think, I recommend turning any device has airplane mode be careful
The other reason why you can't play youtube, or anything else that need internet connection from your electronic devices, such as phone is just because...
there is no connection in the plane. The plane is too fast that your provider can't handle it.
Bruh i got this on recomended when sitting on an airport
You sit on airports?
You a giant?
In the US we still have to turn off cell phone and devices until they get to a certain altitude which I think is 10000 ft. Also applies to coming in for a landing. I think this is more for cell phone triggered bombs than interfering with flight systems, since most cell phones will stop working close to 10,000 feet or above. The FCC has watched too many mission impossible movies LOL
0:28 it’s not called the tarmac!!!!!!!!!!
The day there is a credit card reader in a lavatory door is the day I die
i never thought of this until now but id fucking hate to be on a plane with someone talking the whole fucking time on their phone and im sitting next to them or something.
But they're not talking about cell phones they're talking about data transmission of any kind.
The first person that told me to dislike or like. That deserves a like
You can use phones...there is something called AIRPLANE MODE
Yeah but you don't need to turn it on, you just can't make calls without getting caught.
Well with the iPhone Xs Max you'd expect the phone to turn into an airplane itself with airplane mode at that price
@@p-mies1192 you are the funny guy at partys arent you?
@@sukondisnuts8806 not the funny guy but the "funny" guy
@@p-mies1192 k
Didn't think I'd be watching a pulseway ad with Linus in it before watching a video that also has Linus in it