Yes it is appropriate. But please avoid cornering and braking on corners while you are going uphil or downhil on roads which have snow, mud, sand, loose soil, etc. Sometimes when the temperature is much much lower a layer or transparent ice gets deposited on the road. It looks like the road itself, but it is actually a very thin layer of transparent ice. In such cases the meteor'r tires may skid easily.
@@rides-reviews i know it is called pala bro and I'm pretty used to mountainous roads and conditions😅 actually i belong to mountains, that's why I want to know if i should buy meteor .... Or Should I look towards classic or hunter Considering meteor's way forward foot pegs position.. Is it not a little uncomfortable on the mountain roads to ride? As in plain terrain it is the perfect bike for me I guess..... But I have doubts about mountains......Btw you belong to plain terrain or mountainous?
@@ajaysinghrawat8745 I belong to a plain area and bought the bike in November 2023. However, my friend who is using meteor since it was first launched in India and he has been to many hill stations, including Rudra Prayag and similar places. he never complained about the bike. He does almost 1 trip to per month to Rishikesh and other hilly areas. As far as you on a ROAD, I don't think there is a problem. I think if I were you, I would have gone for a lighter bike, like the hunter. But as far as the extended foot peg position is concerned, I never find it troublesome while riding on the road, obviously here in the planes. Don't know, if I answered your question properly, but here is what I meant in short: Extended footage position - No problem in plains Mountain experience of my friend with a 2 year experience of meteor 350 - No problem Recommendation: If you are around 5.5 feet or a few inches more, and will be riding in the mountains, my recommendation is Hunter or Meteor. Not classic, because my feet don't touch the ground properly on the Classic 350 and it feels much much heavier compared to the meteor while both are same weight. I your height is good, you can go for classic as well. Problem with Classic 350: use of cast iron in many parts, so parts get rusted easily.
@@rides-reviews thanks for the detailed response brother... That explains pretty much all ..... I guess the meteor it is.......also I'm 5'6"... For hunter i read about pillion less comfort and smaller seat length..also heating exposure to the rider is more than meteor.... If hunter had longer seat i would have gone for it.
Yes, when you get a hang of it, then this bike doesn't feel that heavy. This maybe partially due to the low seat height, which allows people of even my height, effortlessly move this bike.
Good review
Thanks a lot @ nayaktc 😇😇
Is it appropriate for hilly region's corners and tilted roads and all ?
Yes it is appropriate. But please avoid cornering and braking on corners while you are going uphil or downhil on roads which have snow, mud, sand, loose soil, etc.
Sometimes when the temperature is much much lower a layer or transparent ice gets deposited on the road. It looks like the road itself, but it is actually a very thin layer of transparent ice.
In such cases the meteor'r tires may skid easily.
@@rides-reviews i know it is called pala bro and I'm pretty used to mountainous roads and conditions😅 actually i belong to mountains, that's why I want to know if i should buy meteor .... Or Should I look towards classic or hunter Considering meteor's way forward foot pegs position.. Is it not a little uncomfortable on the mountain roads to ride? As in plain terrain it is the perfect bike for me I guess..... But I have doubts about mountains......Btw you belong to plain terrain or mountainous?
@@ajaysinghrawat8745 I belong to a plain area and bought the bike in November 2023. However, my friend who is using meteor since it was first launched in India and he has been to many hill stations, including Rudra Prayag and similar places. he never complained about the bike. He does almost 1 trip to per month to Rishikesh and other hilly areas. As far as you on a ROAD, I don't think there is a problem.
I think if I were you, I would have gone for a lighter bike, like the hunter. But as far as the extended foot peg position is concerned, I never find it troublesome while riding on the road, obviously here in the planes.
Don't know, if I answered your question properly, but here is what I meant in short:
Extended footage position - No problem in plains
Mountain experience of my friend with a 2 year experience of meteor 350 - No problem
Recommendation: If you are around 5.5 feet or a few inches more, and will be riding in the mountains, my recommendation is Hunter or Meteor. Not classic, because my feet don't touch the ground properly on the Classic 350 and it feels much much heavier compared to the meteor while both are same weight. I your height is good, you can go for classic as well.
Problem with Classic 350: use of cast iron in many parts, so parts get rusted easily.
@@rides-reviews thanks for the detailed response brother... That explains pretty much all ..... I guess the meteor it is.......also I'm 5'6"... For hunter i read about pillion less comfort and smaller seat length..also heating exposure to the rider is more than meteor.... If hunter had longer seat i would have gone for it.
Well, then Welcome to the Meteor Family 😇😇
Have you checked mileage??
Not exactly, but my guess is around 40 kmpl for highway
In city, it may be less.
Will be checking it soon and making a video of the same.
Meteor looks heavier overall, could be used for local rides as well.
Yes, when you get a hang of it, then this bike doesn't feel that heavy. This maybe partially due to the low seat height, which allows people of even my height, effortlessly move this bike.