Graphene in Composites Comparative Study

The results of a comparative study of graphene materials in composites systems is presented and discussed. Thisincludes the implications for the composites sector and how companies can learn more about graphene enhanced composites.

[@patricioalvarezromanini8085]

My congratulations to Terrence Barkan for the effort he makes in spreading the technologies associated with graphene and 2D materials. Very grateful for the information and the quality of the exhibitors in this virtual event.😇

[@reginaldburnbridge2217]

Could this clumping be down to electrical static generated.

[@ryantrollip5734]

19 graphene materials which you don't mention at all. Not very useful. Why hide the results? smells like marketing B.S.

[@AdvancedCarbonsCouncil-ACC]

Dear Ryan, All of the materials we tested are defined as graphene under ISO Standards. The 19 forms and types of graphene included graphene nano-platelets, graphene oxide, reduced graphene oxide and functionalized graphene materials. We do not name the producers or products because our objectives was to conduct an unbiased, head to head, non-optimized test to simply determine if graphene can significantly improve composites. The net results is that even though the tests were not optimized at all for the materials tested, we saw significant improvements which can be made even better when optimizing specific graphene materials with the target application.
Anyone that would like to connect with qualified graphene producers and those that provide functionalized graphene for the composites sector can contact The Graphene Council at [e-mail] or visit www.thegraphenecouncil.org to request more information.
Thank you for your interest.

[@randalmoroski1184]

I appreciate the details and patient diligence in your response.

[@ramondrongonui1024]

Thank you for your expertise, knowledge is power...

[@AdvancedCarbonsCouncil-ACC]

Our pleasure, it is part of our mission to share knowledge that helps inform all stakeholders.