@@markcorrigan3930 I don't know if that specific game works well but CS:GO, a Dx9 title, now runs really good according to this video (370 FPS, with the i3 13100 the CPU is probably the limmiting factor). So it appeares the big performance issues with older titles are fixed.
@@RandomGaminginHD yeah I'm not confident in Intel's innovative drive to produce a 2nd gen. I'm sorry, but due to their plodding nature with their CPU business, I see them as an aging dinosaur. Whereas AMD is the new sexy. Also, as I own a Viotek GF127DBXA 27 inch 1440p monitor, GREAT buy by the way, I appreciate the resolution, and it points out the glaring difference of 1080p on a higher res monitor. The games look fantastic at my native res, in spite of YT compression.
@@gavjlewis In this case even fully functional chips are used WHEN the higher end parts are piling up. So A770 and A750 are selling OK... really hope Intel doesn't give up!
Mad props to you on 1 thing. I have seen HUNDREDS of videos on YT where the performance is tested on Cyber Punk 2077. But you’re the only 1 out of those hundreds to show a proper rampage in that gameplay footage. Good on ya for showing that off, was beginning to wonder if that was even possible.
Nice to see how much better these are doing. I really do hope that Intel keeps up with Arc as I think they have the potential to be competitive... and we desperately need it. And despite the issues... they're doing a lot better for their first dedicated gaming GPU than I expected.
Launch was rough, but these are looking pretty good rn. Especially considering their RT performance. Just wish they were better at content creation software, because that's what keeps me chained to my overlords at Nvidia.
Hey RGiHD, Missing the old content where you would find bargains / less known components that were great for gaming, Absolutely loved those, Maybe go used market soon? :)
Thanks for this. I'm building a new PC with an i5 12400f and have been hesitant to go with an Arc but this has convinced me it is worth seriously considering. One thing holding me back (on any card really) is that I don't play any of the games every one uses in these reviews, so the inclusion of Elden Ring was much appreciated. edit to add: So I did go with an Arc, the Acer Predator Bifrost.
Awesome video once again 💪👍😇! Intels new i3’s are definitely a powerhouse with the new Alder Lake cores. Definitely puts the i3 above its weight class for for decent price imo! The Arc gpus now with most driver issues resolved, are great gpus, especially the A750 and 770! We deserve way more and better competition between manufacturers than we currently have.
Good to hear the driver improvements are coming along nicely for Intel GPUs. Stable enough to be competitive in the lower to middle end may just give them a chance.
With their latest change to their drivers with how they handle DX11 games, this 13100f/a750 combo is looking tempting for a budget 1080p competitive settings rig.
the witcher 3 single frame stutters are not a card problem but are due to the game engine loading or caching stuff during gameplay, it was in the old gen version too and it happened on every rig i saw the witcher 3 on and every video with the frametime graph on
Nice! I've been benchmarking my ARC A770 and putting out videos too. Seems like people are really interested. Also im taking requests for games if people want
Recently updated my son's rig - went from a i7 3770 on a H61 board to a i3-10105 in a z590, huge difference with the performance and has allowed the RX 580 8GB to stretch it's legs in games at 1080p. Next I plan on moving him to a higher refresh panel.
@@karanveer6130 the best thing i could think of is that you can easily swap out the 10105 to something like an 11th gen i7 and that guarantees you that you have quality vrms to handle the power but other than that yeah its a bit overkill for an i3
@@luukverhoek4243 tbh you don't know how much he got the z590 for. It's now 2 generations old and are under £100 (just) at some etailers, or less second hand. I would rather a z board than an H or B board.
It was a nice surprise to see how well the cards are really performing, now that the drivers are much better optimized. I am curious to see how well the A750 and A770 stacks up to the competition now, especially considering the weak results ARC had in 1080p in many games. If Intel continues to develop the drivers, and further optimize them, I am positive that the Intel ARC GPU's will age like a fine wine, much like what has been the case with AMD Radeon. Guess we will have to wait and see how the future of Intel ARC will turn out, because we desperately need a third competitor in the graphics market
Im really impressed with that arc gpu, I heard they were kinda garbage but it seems like driver improvements have really made it a competitor in the entry level gpu market
I’ve had the Intel Arc A750 GPU for 6 months, and I’ve played Horizon Zero Dawn, World of Warcraft, League of Legends, Hogwarts Legacy, Lego Star Wars: Skywalker Saga, Forza Horizon 5, God of War, Cyberpunk, and Wukong, among other modern games. I haven’t had any problems; everything runs incredibly well and smoothly at 1080p with high graphics settings. Nintendo emulators also work perfectly-Mario Kart 8, Zelda: Breath of the Wild and Tears of the Kingdom, Luigi’s Mansion, etc. The performance of the graphics card is really impressive for only $170 on Amazon. I should clarify that performance in DX10 and DX9 games is poor; some games don’t even start. But it works perfectly with DX11 and DX12. It’s also important to note that older builds perform poorly; it’s crucial that the motherboard supports R-BAR and DDR5 to achieve maximum performance.
11:28 View distance only counts for objects and terrain. Enemies are uneffected by this setting and many ESport players actually set it to low, because if players far away hides behind something they see the player regardless
I've been very curious about how the Arc cards have been coming along to see if they can even be considered. With what I've seen here, for 1440p gaming, they clearly can. Thanks for putting this out there. I now have the potential for putting together a relatively cheap 1440p gaming rig for a friend who's been down on his luck, financially speaking. Thumbs up clicked!
Did u go through with it? If yes may i ask how was your experience and what you paired it with? Where i live the Arc cards are wayyy cheaper than the 3060 and 60-70$ cheaper than the rx6600 so I'm considering the arc card but I've heard mixed reviews 🙁
@@rakuzan5839 I actually didn't go through with it because, like you, I too have been seeing mixed reviews. Apparently, in some games the cards run just fine whereas in others, the frame rates really suffer. I got my friend a 6600 paired with a last gen 5600x and 16GB DDR4 3600 CL 18 RAM. I was on a limited budget though since I've also just bought and built my own PC. Sorry I couldn't be of anymore help
1:37 with this card I’d probably run identical quality, ultra FSR and native 1080p with my 144 hz monitor just to be competitive. Maybe even a little lower settings or balanced for shipment where the chaos can impact performance a little
I really feel for Intel here, they still have a lot of catching up to do. The work they've put in to the drivers seems pretty good. Hopefully Battlemage can have some improvements built in for some of the weak areas. I have a 1660 Super, and it's not really viable for me, some games will run worse.
I bought an ARC A750 GPU and I am having constant issues with Adaptive Sync (Freesync). My monitor was originally compatible with nVidia G-Sync and then later updated to work with AMD. Now it seems like it sometimes works and sometimes doesn't. I hope Intel driver updates solve this issue.
I bought an a750 at launch and don’t too much to complain about thus far. Performance in the games that I generally play was good to start with and is only getting better. No buyers remorse here.
I'm on a tight budget so I built exactly this, I3 13100 F + ARC 750 8gb + 16 gb 5200 patriot Venom ram on a TUF B760M Gaming plus wi fi, it's a blast coming from a I5 650 1st gen and GTX 950 EVGA FTW , it was easy to be more than happy with this setup. In GW2, 150 fps+ roaming on the map, it's good because the 750 is supposed to have difficulties in old game, drv 4953 Good vid, thks. Edit: monitor 27'' 1440p 144hz, your video has been the decisive factor to buy this setup, thks again.
G'day Random, Down here in Australia the RX6600 is the better buy, Best prices for this performance level where I shop at Scorptec or PCCG are Sapphire RX6600Pulse $369AUD, Intel ARC750 $449AUD & Gigabyte RTX3060GAMING OC $489AUD
6:30 XeSS is really good on ARC cards, better than FSR 2.x. So at least Ultra Quality should always be enabled imho And for Fortnite, TSR Medium is what I'd use in almost every case (except on high end cards where I'd go with TSR high)
Have you tried escape from tarkov, its a really cpu dependant game, I would love to see you try the game out on different hardware. Keep up the amazing work brutha
These are always the issue with first gen. Drivers. But I'm hopeful. 1440p at medium to high that cost less than $400 at below 250W of power is gonna be an interesting ground to compete in, seeing how many are targeting the higher end. Can't wait for Arc gen 2. I think they should improve the Arc Control Center to have better control.
The i3 13100f really does punch above its weight and is a great starter processor for those just getting involved with PC gaming. The first PC I built was with a Ryzen 3 3200G and a RX 570, and that can run a lot of games at 1080p medium settings, but I think my next dedicated gaming PC will be an Intel build. My Ryzen system is being used as an HTPC atm.
Could i ask you to try to tests with some older games (like GTA) but using DXVK? Apparently that often works surprisingly well with Nvidia and Amd, and considering that Intel still has some performance problems with the older DX-APIs this might be interesting to see.
Great GPU, I would totally go for it if I didn’t need more for my use. Again, I’ll be keeping an eye out if there will be something of an “A790” and whether that can push 60fps+ at 1620p 21:9 for most games. - Right now, I need a 6800XT for that, but that’s still a bit too much for my budget at the moment. That said, the A750 seems absolutely great for playing many games at nice settings for a good price.
LEVEL OF DETAIL >>... so proud i remember seeing all the LOD on the sprite based foliage .... looks a lot better not some hitches on hand offs and carry overs since what you see being rendered is technically a weird render shape of the chip... .that helps as well..
I needed to comment cause I saw you were testing GTA san Def edtion. And man not only am I happy you tested that supposed trainwreck of a game, so I get to see how it runs and looks. Good video for that!
Wow, I'm actually quite impressed. I need to see the pricing of this card in my area now curious if it would be worth it to get a cheaper but still good GPU for my friends first PC
Guessing the few Intel Arc A-Series Laptops have improved as well. Intel seems fragmented with the Iris, Xe and Pro naming scheme all under laptop banner.
I have an A750 and after 3 weeks had to rip it out of my PC again. Performance is solid, some games work well. But some games keep crashing as some API calls are just not present, and it's impossible to use Arc for work (GPU programming) as it just keeps crashing the PC til reboot, eliminating any unsaved files. Drivers still are an untested mess.
My local Microcenter has the RX 6600 for $220 and RX 6650 for $250, seems a way better deal if you can get that, considering the A750 is being sold for $250.
Could you do a test of 1080ti in 2023 as these card are getting really cheap these days? It would be interesting to see how it performs compared to this.
I'm sad that there were no XeSS enabled/disabled for the few games that support it in the graph (on quality settings, ultra quality isn't something too interesting due to low boost)
Can you try benchmarking on Escape From Tarkov? That game is super demanding when it comes to CPU wise and I want to see how an i3 13th gen performs on that game.
Usual break balls that spends his time reading comments and comments for just correcting them on a freaking social media. Good job, now I'm sure i will be a better person thank you. 👍
Thx for the test. Could you (or someone else) measure the CPU-Z benchmark (17.01.64) in single and multi thread with this 13100 cpu? I would like to compare it to my current cpu. Thank you.
I'd love to love the 13100 but the 13400 just throws so many cores at you that the i3 feels barely acceptable. Glad to know there's a 1440p build for $600 out there though :)
I've had the previous generation i3 12100F for about 6 months or so and am very happy with it. I've still held onto my trusty old GTX 1060 though as GPU prices were bonkers back then. I'm looking at what I can replace it with- maybe the ARC750 would be a good upgrade?
I have the 12100f as well and upgraded from 1650super to arc a770 and difference is pretty huge. a750 isn't far behind the a770 in benchmarks. The only reason I went for the a770 is because I got a deal on it, I was planning on the a750 originally. Plus, Im hoping it lasts a long time and the 16gb of vram is more future proof.
@@JakeTaco83 there's around £100 difference between the 750 and 770 in the UK at the moment. Going to wait until some of the lower end rdna3 cards from amd are released before I choose.
I have the A770 and looking forward to more driver level optimisations and even the upcoming Meteor lake where it uses the Arc as a base for the iGPU. The IPC increase of 12th gen and 13th gen is kinda quite refreshing to see. Where the mobile 1260p in some encoding workloads can even compete with my 5900x in terms of rendering time. Impressive. If Intel keeps this up, I might switch to an Intel CPU again for my next rig but that's gonna be at least 5 years from now.
@@boohzr I have only tried it with native Linux games with vulkan, emulation using OpenGL does work. It is still considered experimental in stable distribution releases so I is not on my daily driver machine (which is used for work). I have an A380 that I wanna upgrade my mainboard to use it for AV1 encoding but software support for it isn't as good as I would like. Sorry I can only speak on a Linux point of view.
Hey there, I have a question for you about this system. I'm thinking to build a pc very similar to this one and already have a 500w psu so I'm thinking of reusing it. It has one 12v rail that supports up to 456watts. Problem I have is that psu only has one 8 pin pci power cable. I think wattage wise, psu will be enough, so I was wondering if I could leave 6pin slot on the gpu unhabited or must I daisy chain that pci cable.
it seems that intel got their hardware done right, judging from the differences in game performance pointing to the drivers. and their pricing is adjacent to their performance and if it remains the same as they maximise their driver potential across all games will genuinely be the better option compared to 3060 and 6600(cant remember which cards were in the 350 price range but thats what i mean)
I think they are just hoping for people to then buy the next higher CPU. I did go with the 12600K for my last build specifically cause of the e-cores (on a B660 board), and was really hoping that this time Intel would not cut desktop-CPUs that hard. 2p8e and 96 EU - that i would buy instantly cause that would be enough for a small, light, portable multimedia-station, but that is only available on mobile -.-
I hope intel pays attention to the low-end market as well as high-end market, their current GPUs aren't for everyone specially those who own older Intel CPUs.
I have a 770 Version and i am be very happy to get a card for not my soul as the price. She is very high Quality (Cooler) and a nice card for a lot of interessting things i never seen in my 20 years of Computer Experience. We need the Blue ones as a third player. Please, if you need a card, buy a blue one. She is Beautifull. :-D
The improvements compared to the performance at launch is really impressing. I hope Intel continues to improve their drivers and stays competitive.
Yeah same, would like to see some 2nd gen stuff too from Intel
Have they fixed the problems with DirectX 9,10,11? Because Fallout 4,New Vegas didn't perform well
@@markcorrigan3930 I don't know if that specific game works well but CS:GO, a Dx9 title, now runs really good according to this video (370 FPS, with the i3 13100 the CPU is probably the limmiting factor). So it appeares the big performance issues with older titles are fixed.
@@RandomGaminginHD yeah I'm not confident in Intel's innovative drive to produce a 2nd gen. I'm sorry, but due to their plodding nature with their CPU business, I see them as an aging dinosaur. Whereas AMD is the new sexy. Also, as I own a Viotek GF127DBXA 27 inch 1440p monitor, GREAT buy by the way, I appreciate the resolution, and it points out the glaring difference of 1080p on a higher res monitor. The games look fantastic at my native res, in spite of YT compression.
@@mattparker9726 AMD shill detected.
The most appealing looking Arc GPU was the A580 but it never materialised!
Yeah I want to get an a310 as well but that seems to be non existent
@@gavjlewis In this case even fully functional chips are used WHEN the higher end parts are piling up. So A770 and A750 are selling OK... really hope Intel doesn't give up!
@@RandomGaminginHD I like your videos im from south Africa can you maybe do a video in the future if and when you get an a380 paired with i7 4790
@@gavjlewis ah, like what happened to the Ryzen 3300
@@RandomGaminginHD low end GPUs in south Africa is still very expensive the 1050 to 4gb is over R5000 in south Africa
Mad props to you on 1 thing. I have seen HUNDREDS of videos on YT where the performance is tested on Cyber Punk 2077. But you’re the only 1 out of those hundreds to show a proper rampage in that gameplay footage. Good on ya for showing that off, was beginning to wonder if that was even possible.
I would really like to see what 4p and 4e cores looks like in games that can use 6 cores. vs something like a 12400
6 core 12400 would still be better , the 4 ecores don't do much while gaming
E cores wont do any shit in games only in productivity
@@mikkodoria4778 they can help with 1%lows, since your only using the p cores to game, and the e cores for everything else.
E core performance is about haswell ipc.
A simple way to look at it is that E cores are about half the performance of P cores.
Nice to see how much better these are doing. I really do hope that Intel keeps up with Arc as I think they have the potential to be competitive... and we desperately need it. And despite the issues... they're doing a lot better for their first dedicated gaming GPU than I expected.
Launch was rough, but these are looking pretty good rn. Especially considering their RT performance. Just wish they were better at content creation software, because that's what keeps me chained to my overlords at Nvidia.
Hey RGiHD, Missing the old content where you would find bargains / less known components that were great for gaming, Absolutely loved those, Maybe go used market soon? :)
Yeah for sure got a couple of things lined up
@@RandomGaminginHD yay!
These are bargain parts
@@GhettoPCbuilds u clearly don't know about the hd 7750 1080p graphics card for $10.80
@@ozairahmed1352 LMFAO
Thanks for this. I'm building a new PC with an i5 12400f and have been hesitant to go with an Arc but this has convinced me it is worth seriously considering. One thing holding me back (on any card really) is that I don't play any of the games every one uses in these reviews, so the inclusion of Elden Ring was much appreciated.
edit to add: So I did go with an Arc, the Acer Predator Bifrost.
How do you like it so far?
I’m also getting this gpu is it good or should I find a different one
Imagine if the the cards launched with these drivers initially, the mindset would've been completely different!
Awesome video once again 💪👍😇! Intels new i3’s are definitely a powerhouse with the new Alder Lake cores. Definitely puts the i3 above its weight class for for decent price imo! The Arc gpus now with most driver issues resolved, are great gpus, especially the A750 and 770! We deserve way more and better competition between manufacturers than we currently have.
Just waiting for Nvidia to pull their cpus, might not buy but just for the competition
Good to hear the driver improvements are coming along nicely for Intel GPUs. Stable enough to be competitive in the lower to middle end may just give them a chance.
With their latest change to their drivers with how they handle DX11 games, this 13100f/a750 combo is looking tempting for a budget 1080p competitive settings rig.
Excellent video idea. Excellent execution. Love your content random guy.
You can always count on Jhevier for a great comment!
@@KushiKush lost brother of xavier?
the witcher 3 single frame stutters are not a card problem but are due to the game engine loading or caching stuff during gameplay, it was in the old gen version too and it happened on every rig i saw the witcher 3 on and every video with the frametime graph on
Nice! I've been benchmarking my ARC A770 and putting out videos too. Seems like people are really interested.
Also im taking requests for games if people want
Recently updated my son's rig - went from a i7 3770 on a H61 board to a i3-10105 in a z590, huge difference with the performance and has allowed the RX 580 8GB to stretch it's legs in games at 1080p. Next I plan on moving him to a higher refresh panel.
who buys a z590 for an i3
@@karanveer6130 the best thing i could think of is that you can easily swap out the 10105 to something like an 11th gen i7 and that guarantees you that you have quality vrms to handle the power but other than that yeah its a bit overkill for an i3
@@karanveer6130 Exactly, that is just ridiculous!
@@luukverhoek4243 tbh you don't know how much he got the z590 for. It's now 2 generations old and are under £100 (just) at some etailers, or less second hand. I would rather a z board than an H or B board.
Thats crazy good performance for that price. it comes almost down to the price of a next gen console for more performance. Sick
Surprisingly great combination.
The continuing improvements has me very excited!
It was a nice surprise to see how well the cards are really performing, now that the drivers are much better optimized.
I am curious to see how well the A750 and A770 stacks up to the competition now, especially considering the weak results ARC had in 1080p in many games.
If Intel continues to develop the drivers, and further optimize them, I am positive that the Intel ARC GPU's will age like a fine wine, much like what has been the case with AMD Radeon.
Guess we will have to wait and see how the future of Intel ARC will turn out, because we desperately need a third competitor in the graphics market
They just have to be cheaper to compete at this point
fhd is not so great on arc - it needs higher resolution to saturate the shaders.
Im really impressed with that arc gpu, I heard they were kinda garbage but it seems like driver improvements have really made it a competitor in the entry level gpu market
Question, what happened to the video that you released which was about testing a graphics card on GTA V singleplayer and online?
Felt incomplete, am working on a better version
Was about to ask lol.
@@RandomGaminginHD Oh, okay. Take your time with it, was just curious on why it got removed after a few hours.
I’ve had the Intel Arc A750 GPU for 6 months, and I’ve played Horizon Zero Dawn, World of Warcraft, League of Legends, Hogwarts Legacy, Lego Star Wars: Skywalker Saga, Forza Horizon 5, God of War, Cyberpunk, and Wukong, among other modern games. I haven’t had any problems; everything runs incredibly well and smoothly at 1080p with high graphics settings. Nintendo emulators also work perfectly-Mario Kart 8, Zelda: Breath of the Wild and Tears of the Kingdom, Luigi’s Mansion, etc. The performance of the graphics card is really impressive for only $170 on Amazon.
I should clarify that performance in DX10 and DX9 games is poor; some games don’t even start. But it works perfectly with DX11 and DX12. It’s also important to note that older builds perform poorly; it’s crucial that the motherboard supports R-BAR and DDR5 to achieve maximum performance.
11:28 View distance only counts for objects and terrain. Enemies are uneffected by this setting and many ESport players actually set it to low, because if players far away hides behind something they see the player regardless
Very cool!
It makes perfect sense that Intel should make a GPU, and it is awesome to see some strong new competition in the market.
Did you record any footage with Arc's Av1 encoder by chance? If so, what was that like?
I've been very curious about how the Arc cards have been coming along to see if they can even be considered. With what I've seen here, for 1440p gaming, they clearly can. Thanks for putting this out there. I now have the potential for putting together a relatively cheap 1440p gaming rig for a friend who's been down on his luck, financially speaking. Thumbs up clicked!
Did u go through with it? If yes may i ask how was your experience and what you paired it with? Where i live the Arc cards are wayyy cheaper than the 3060 and 60-70$ cheaper than the rx6600 so I'm considering the arc card but I've heard mixed reviews 🙁
@@rakuzan5839 I actually didn't go through with it because, like you, I too have been seeing mixed reviews. Apparently, in some games the cards run just fine whereas in others, the frame rates really suffer. I got my friend a 6600 paired with a last gen 5600x and 16GB DDR4 3600 CL 18 RAM. I was on a limited budget though since I've also just bought and built my own PC. Sorry I couldn't be of anymore help
1:37 with this card I’d probably run identical quality, ultra FSR and native 1080p with my 144 hz monitor just to be competitive. Maybe even a little lower settings or balanced for shipment where the chaos can impact performance a little
Excellent video. Enjoying the timeliness of Arc
Thank you, I hadn't thought about the ARC A750 for weeks.
You don't stop surprising me for years.. ;-)
A380,would love to see a review of this budget banger with all it's updated drivers thus far
I really feel for Intel here, they still have a lot of catching up to do. The work they've put in to the drivers seems pretty good. Hopefully Battlemage can have some improvements built in for some of the weak areas. I have a 1660 Super, and it's not really viable for me, some games will run worse.
I bought an ARC A750 GPU and I am having constant issues with Adaptive Sync (Freesync). My monitor was originally compatible with nVidia G-Sync and then later updated to work with AMD. Now it seems like it sometimes works and sometimes doesn't. I hope Intel driver updates solve this issue.
i studied NVIDIAs tricks.... they would change a lot of settings to make it run smoother but to us they OPTIMIZED IT...
These are likely some of the smoothest experiences you have posted so far!
You have my respect for adding W3 Next gen on your testing.
Wow this gpu is really good now
It’s had some solid driver updates :)
Dang this is a solid combo!
I bought an a750 at launch and don’t too much to complain about thus far. Performance in the games that I generally play was good to start with and is only getting better. No buyers remorse here.
a dream i had. of an ALL BLUE intel PC... so proud of you
I'm on a tight budget so I built exactly this, I3 13100 F + ARC 750 8gb + 16 gb 5200 patriot Venom ram on a TUF B760M Gaming plus wi fi, it's a blast coming from a I5 650 1st gen and GTX 950 EVGA FTW , it was easy to be more than happy with this setup.
In GW2, 150 fps+ roaming on the map, it's good because the 750 is supposed to have difficulties in old game, drv 4953
Good vid, thks.
Edit: monitor 27'' 1440p 144hz, your video has been the decisive factor to buy this setup, thks again.
13th gen i3s are such insane value. It can really stick it to the big dogs for most games
Loved the video man. Next time can you give us the 1080p numbers as well, would like to know.
G'day Random,
Down here in Australia the RX6600 is the better buy,
Best prices for this performance level where I shop at Scorptec or PCCG are Sapphire RX6600Pulse $369AUD, Intel ARC750 $449AUD & Gigabyte RTX3060GAMING OC $489AUD
Not sure if you've seen it yet, but ASRock have an A380 in ITX form on Amazon. First custom PCB I've seen of any of the Arc GPUs.
6:30 XeSS is really good on ARC cards, better than FSR 2.x. So at least Ultra Quality should always be enabled imho
And for Fortnite, TSR Medium is what I'd use in almost every case (except on high end cards where I'd go with TSR high)
Dude hitting that 360 on GTAV
This is exactly the content I subscribe for!
I would probably pair a higher-end CPU with this GPU due to my video creation hobby, but the GPU certainly seems promising.
Have you tried escape from tarkov, its a really cpu dependant game, I would love to see you try the game out on different hardware. Keep up the amazing work brutha
These are always the issue with first gen. Drivers. But I'm hopeful. 1440p at medium to high that cost less than $400 at below 250W of power is gonna be an interesting ground to compete in, seeing how many are targeting the higher end.
Can't wait for Arc gen 2. I think they should improve the Arc Control Center to have better control.
Interesting combination for gaming
Too bad it's not that affordable for budget gamers
Love this new format, please keep it up brother!)))
The i3 13100f really does punch above its weight and is a great starter processor for those just getting involved with PC gaming. The first PC I built was with a Ryzen 3 3200G and a RX 570, and that can run a lot of games at 1080p medium settings, but I think my next dedicated gaming PC will be an Intel build. My Ryzen system is being used as an HTPC atm.
Happy intel gpus getting better with driver optimisation 😊
tbh this arc is better than expected
Could i ask you to try to tests with some older games (like GTA) but using DXVK? Apparently that often works surprisingly well with Nvidia and Amd, and considering that Intel still has some performance problems with the older DX-APIs this might be interesting to see.
I'm pretty sure that big improvement to Arc drivers was due to them actually integrating DXVK
@@shineymcshine Yeah it was
I'd really like to see some productivity or non-gaming benchmarks, especially when you look at less common hardware like the Intel GPUs
To be fair, this is a gaming channel.
If it can run elden ring it can do anything u want
Nice to see some channels revisiting this graphics card. Pretty good performance at 1440P. Great video.
what a fantastic build.
around 20 to 40% software to curve to drain left on gpu for render fluidity
Great GPU, I would totally go for it if I didn’t need more for my use. Again, I’ll be keeping an eye out if there will be something of an “A790” and whether that can push 60fps+ at 1620p 21:9 for most games. - Right now, I need a 6800XT for that, but that’s still a bit too much for my budget at the moment.
That said, the A750 seems absolutely great for playing many games at nice settings for a good price.
Nice video!
How come no one uses vsync? I hate the screen tearing without it...
For Elden ring, the area you really wanna test is all around caria manor. From Iji the blacksmith to back behind the manor
Grass Quality setting will wreck the fps there 😆I'm able to hold 60 fps on max settings everywhere but there (it drops to
LEVEL OF DETAIL >>... so proud i remember seeing all the LOD on the sprite based foliage .... looks a lot better not some hitches on hand offs and carry overs since what you see being rendered is technically a weird render shape of the chip... .that helps as well..
I needed to comment cause I saw you were testing GTA san Def edtion. And man not only am I happy you tested that supposed trainwreck of a game, so I get to see how it runs and looks. Good video for that!
Wow, I'm actually quite impressed. I need to see the pricing of this card in my area now curious if it would be worth it to get a cheaper but still good GPU for my friends first PC
I wish Intel success with their Arc graphics cards simply because it will lead to more competition which will ultimately be good for consumers.
Guessing the few Intel Arc A-Series Laptops have improved as well. Intel seems fragmented with the Iris, Xe and Pro naming scheme all under laptop banner.
I have an A750 and after 3 weeks had to rip it out of my PC again. Performance is solid, some games work well. But some games keep crashing as some API calls are just not present, and it's impossible to use Arc for work (GPU programming) as it just keeps crashing the PC til reboot, eliminating any unsaved files. Drivers still are an untested mess.
Arc is exactly like that drunk friend who suddenly remembered that he's supposed to be doing a favor for you
Great vid. But is a used 3060 a safer choice ?
My local Microcenter has the RX 6600 for $220 and RX 6650 for $250, seems a way better deal if you can get that, considering the A750 is being sold for $250.
Its 229 right now, im still on the edge if I wanna get this or the 6650xt for my first build.
So what did you get?
Could you do a test of 1080ti in 2023 as these card are getting really cheap these days? It would be interesting to see how it performs compared to this.
I'm sad that there were no XeSS enabled/disabled for the few games that support it in the graph (on quality settings, ultra quality isn't something too interesting due to low boost)
Can you try benchmarking on Escape From Tarkov? That game is super demanding when it comes to CPU wise and I want to see how an i3 13th gen performs on that game.
Don't encourage russian made games.
lots of multiplayer games use more cpu than single player ones
Man that Cyberpunk result is AWFUL... the RX 6600 non XT can run 1080p ultra with FSR quality at well over 60fps...
i think they have become a viable option now for these budget gaming builds.
love your videos
Strange but I think that the Gpuz specs for the a750 here shows way lower values then the specs we having for example in techpowerup.
I'm glad I'm not the only one saw that.
Usual break balls that spends his time reading comments and comments for just correcting them on a freaking social media. Good job, now I'm sure i will be a better person thank you. 👍
Thx for the test.
Could you (or someone else) measure the CPU-Z benchmark (17.01.64) in single and multi thread with this 13100 cpu? I would like to compare it to my current cpu.
Thank you.
Please do Intel Core i3 13100F paired with Intel Arc A380.
I'd love to love the 13100 but the 13400 just throws so many cores at you that the i3 feels barely acceptable.
Glad to know there's a 1440p build for $600 out there though :)
Can you do an updated review now that we have the latest improvements with the newer drivers? Thanks.
Hi bro, are you going to test the new version of DLSS?
Thanks for cool videos!
4:43 casually pulling a 360 Drift
I've had the previous generation i3 12100F for about 6 months or so and am very happy with it. I've still held onto my trusty old GTX 1060 though as GPU prices were bonkers back then. I'm looking at what I can replace it with- maybe the ARC750 would be a good upgrade?
I have the 12100f as well and upgraded from 1650super to arc a770 and difference is pretty huge. a750 isn't far behind the a770 in benchmarks. The only reason I went for the a770 is because I got a deal on it, I was planning on the a750 originally. Plus, Im hoping it lasts a long time and the 16gb of vram is more future proof.
@@JakeTaco83 there's around £100 difference between the 750 and 770 in the UK at the moment. Going to wait until some of the lower end rdna3 cards from amd are released before I choose.
@@RolanTheBrave that's what I was originally planning. Was waiting for the rx 7700
I have the A770 and looking forward to more driver level optimisations and even the upcoming Meteor lake where it uses the Arc as a base for the iGPU. The IPC increase of 12th gen and 13th gen is kinda quite refreshing to see. Where the mobile 1260p in some encoding workloads can even compete with my 5900x in terms of rendering time. Impressive. If Intel keeps this up, I might switch to an Intel CPU again for my next rig but that's gonna be at least 5 years from now.
How do you like your A770? I think that's what I want to put in my rig when I get some more money. I think for 350 it seems like its so worth it.
@@boohzr I have only tried it with native Linux games with vulkan, emulation using OpenGL does work. It is still considered experimental in stable distribution releases so I is not on my daily driver machine (which is used for work). I have an A380 that I wanna upgrade my mainboard to use it for AV1 encoding but software support for it isn't as good as I would like. Sorry I can only speak on a Linux point of view.
@@jierenzheng7670 that’s okay man thanks i appreciate it.
What I like about Ark is how the gpu clock speeds are locked until you overclock
Did you run COD’s numbers thru the built in benchmark or just straight out of multiplayer games?
I'm curious now how intel apus would look like I mean would it even be worth it compared to amd apus?
Do you think the Arc A750 will run well inside of an Optiplex 7010, which has an i5-3470 and 16GB of ram and a sufficient PSU?
No. Arc does best with rebar, which is not available on older machines.
I'd recommend the 6600 instead or a Pascal card.
as the dude above me said. the 6600 is a 100 watt gt 1080 for $270 usd. best value per dollar along with wattage man kind has witnessed to see
Great video.
Hey there, I have a question for you about this system. I'm thinking to build a pc very similar to this one and already have a 500w psu so I'm thinking of reusing it. It has one 12v rail that supports up to 456watts. Problem I have is that psu only has one 8 pin pci power cable. I think wattage wise, psu will be enough, so I was wondering if I could leave 6pin slot on the gpu unhabited or must I daisy chain that pci cable.
it seems that intel got their hardware done right, judging from the differences in game performance pointing to the drivers. and their pricing is adjacent to their performance and if it remains the same as they maximise their driver potential across all games will genuinely be the better option compared to 3060 and 6600(cant remember which cards were in the 350 price range but thats what i mean)
RX6600 is at 235-250, for 350 I think it will be RX6600XT 🤔
I'd like to see them add E cores to the I3s. even if its only 2.
Yeah that would be good, maybe someday
@@RandomGaminginHD It would take budget to a whole new level!
I think they are just hoping for people to then buy the next higher CPU. I did go with the 12600K for my last build specifically cause of the e-cores (on a B660 board), and was really hoping that this time Intel would not cut desktop-CPUs that hard.
2p8e and 96 EU - that i would buy instantly cause that would be enough for a small, light, portable multimedia-station, but that is only available on mobile -.-
@@ABaumstumpf I agree. I was really hoping the E cores would finally come since they were adding them to the mobile versions. Maybe next gen🤞
Surprisingly good performance! I'm still rocking RX 580 8GB. Good enough for me....
Have you thought about adding horizon zero dawn to your test suite ?
I love your videos man! keep up the work! (Also I'd love to see a video like the ones where you bought a box of unknown graphics cards)
Thanks :) I’ll have an update on that soon actually
@@RandomGaminginHD Niiice! can't wait maybe you can do something with these after all :D
I hope intel pays attention to the low-end market as well as high-end market, their current GPUs aren't for everyone specially those who own older Intel CPUs.
I have a 770 Version and i am be very happy to get a card for not my soul as the price. She is very high Quality (Cooler) and a nice card for a lot of interessting things i never seen in my 20 years of Computer Experience. We need the Blue ones as a third player. Please, if you need a card, buy a blue one. She is Beautifull. :-D