With a $20k bankroll I would be tempted to just do a four or five hand Press. $25-$50-$100-$150-$200 then start over. I think you would come out way better.
@@dylansmith7274 yes it is low, but if you were to actually lose 8 hands, would you be able to handle losing $4000? Compare that to if you win, you would only win $15.
I've lost 11 hands straight before. Luckily I wasn't using this system. Most I've bet using this system was 5$min and biggest bet was 640$. Playing the 5$ table you can lose quite a bit before you start getting into the low thousands. Every time I'd hit Vegas I would spend 3 to 5 hours playing 5$-10$ BJ at whatever casino I happened to be at , using this system, I'd walk away every time with over 300-500$. I would then take 50-100$ and walk around maxing quarter slots, usually wheel of fortune. Id watch to see who had been playing a while and when they'd leave, I'd hit their machine. Ive won so many low/ mid level jackpots that way playing wheel of fortune. But if the machine doesn't start hitting in 3 to 5 plays, I move to the next one. The 50-100 gets spent all on machines after the BJ table. I keep winning chips in my right pocket and the chips/ cash im willing to lose, that I play with in my left pocket. I haven't been to Vegas in 10 years or so and I've heard that they don't use coins in the machines anymore? Everything is on a card now? Man that sounds horrible! I mean I guess I could stick the card in, max bet 3 to 5 times and either keep playing or pull the card and move along but it seems tedious compared to carrying a bucket of quarters or dollar coins and plopping in 3 then hitting the spin button or pulling the wheel. What's everyone's preference? Coins or cards?
@@joshualim3941it’s playing odds, it’s not winning only 15, it’s recovering your losses over and over, you can come up hundreds quick with this method, is there a chance to lose 10 hands perpetually? Of course, you’re gambling, but it’s a good system to win quick.
The great thing about martingale on blackjack is when you hit a blackjack when you are down you get 50% more gains on the same risk. You get way ahead on those, of course that is just a perk and unreliable at best. its all about the slow and steady race and hoping you don't empty your bank before your next win.
I didn’t count how many hands you won but without the huge double on the last hand, if you played a no double, no split Marty, you would have been up around $300 or so which isn’t a bad day of work in what less than 40 minutes. At the table limits you set $15-5000, you would only be able to Marty 9 times. So you’d only need $7,665 to play. Like I said yesterday it’s all about risk tolerance. $20K at 1% apr. is $200 a year! And the probability of losing 9 hands in a row is 1 in 323. If you’re smart, disciplined, get in and get out, you can make money with the Marty.
Kenneth So I completely understand the want to double or split in hopes of taking advantage of the small edge to win an extra bet. It does make sense. The only problem with it when using the Martingale is that you lose a bet. If you are betting $5, 10, 20 and on that third bet you double to $40 and lose, your next bet is 80. So you went from your third bet right to your fifth bet. Which means you lost a step in your progression. The Marty is based on basically winning one hand out of a certain number of hands. For me, I’d rather have more chances to win that one hand, than winning a few extra units. Now maybe if you only doubled on your first two bets and if you lost stayed with the progression and just accepted the loss of the doubled be. You can make up 1-2 units quickly but if you lost a doubled let’s say 5th step bet 16 units would be harder to recoup. So for me the risk just isn’t worth the reward. If you play the Marty +1 system you will win 1-4 units for each hand won. That should be plenty, there is no need for the added risk.
I would only double when the dealer doesn't have a 7 or better showing. You need to double to get the odds on the game without it the advantage goes way up for the casino
Let's be real here: You have to double independent how high the bet is, otherwise the house wins more. Also, when you are doubling, you invest your money with a more than 50 percent chance to win. So you won't chase the doubles with martingale, just the base bet. With the splits it is a bit special: lose / lose = double bet, lose / win = keep the same bet, win / win = start over with initial bet. If you double during a split, check whether the split was overall a success, a push or a loose and act accordingly. Thats how I play usually and it makes sense for me.
It's a good system but it is quite risky especially if the shoe goes south. I personally use it but the lower the table limit the better this can work since your doubles can be slower and given more time
Stephen Levine I agree. It’s solid until it doesn’t work but that goes with every system out there. They all win and they all lose, it’s just about maximizing your wins.
Patrick Flaven you would hate it. Let’s say you start at $5, when you lost 3 hands you’d be down $30. You would need to win 6 hands without losing 3 in a row again just to be even. The limits on tables usually get you 6-8 Marty bets. Trust me, you will want to have the max amount of times you can bet, you will need it. And yes eventually you will lose it all, so be prepared for that.
@@briandempsey4291 What about playing even money until you lose 3 hands in a row then start doubling to a maximum of 3 more times? Seems more reasonable that way
Patrick Flaven the system could be modified in lots of ways. Losing 3 hands in a row still puts you down 3 units, and you will still need 3 wins to make that up. Let’s say you lose 3 $5 bets then double to 10 on your 4th bet and win, your down $10, then you repeat that, now you’re down $20. Eventually you will lose your starting bankroll. The beauty of the Martingale is that you only need to win once to be even for all of your loses and up 1 unit. And it takes a really bad streak for you to lose it all, which do happen. Same with positive progression, you need to have a really good win streak to make that work well. Like a player streak in baccarat. If you won 10 hands in a row and started at $5 and let it ride each time you would have $5120, but as soon as you lose a hand, you’re down $5. Every system out there can win and lose. You just gotta pick one you like and try it out. Go play on the free casino sites and try them all out and see how they work.
Depending on your card strategy, you need to factor in your win percentage. If you are likely to win 33% of the time, you MIGHT get away with it, but the entire principle is about waiting for that single win an reset. If you average a 25% win rate... then you might end up frequency winning after the larger lost. What ever your strategy. Do it 100%. Mixing strategies usually subjects you the disadvantages of those systems while simultaneously removing the advantages of them.
Not fool proof. I spun 21 red on the wheel and the person hit the max then lost he was begging them to raise the limit. It only works with unlimited table max and unlimited bankroll
Tim B. Facts. You can find tables like that but I feel that there very far and few between. Also if you just use math you’ll be okay lol love seeing this stuff cuz people think this works lol
610231718 I was in the the gaming industry for 25 years. I’ve only heard of 1 place where they would give you uncapped limit. You had to bet that the first bet. I’ve seen them give certain players a higher limit but never seen personally any table given no max ever
Tim B. That’s very interesting! Wonder how many people put 25$ down then tried 50$ and was like nope max bet is 25$ haha dry interesting rule thank you for that piece of knowledge I’ll be looking for that infamous table
610231718 I’m not talking about that I’m talking about table max for the casino. The table I was dealing with all the red was a 10k max this particular player could go to 15k . He was begging for 30k if they would’ve been able to bet that 30k he would’ve lost that too.
But what if that person paused every 3 reds, in other words you lose 3 you wait for your color then you continue. I did some simulations and I never reached more than 10 double downs but I assumed I need a bankroll for at least 12.
Skip the Martingale and use the Stearn 3.0 And to be fair you really should be playing perfect Black Jack... Splitting, Doubling and surrendering regardless of where you are in the system. Play at a Quarter table buy in for $3,250 and walk when you are up $500. You will not always win... but over a 1,000 try sample I have a losing session 1 in every 10 sessions. So 9 wins @$500 = $4,500 minus 1 lose @ #3,250 you net on average $1,250 a day when you play 10 sessions a day.
can you please try the 1 - 2. . . 1 - 2 - 4 Betting System Explanation: The way it works is you bet 1 unit, if that bet wins you increase your bet to 2 units. If your second bet wins, you go back down to playing one unit. If your first or second bet loses, you go right to the 1 - 2 - 4 betting sequence, One that sequence is completed you go back down to the 1 - 2, Thank you so much
For those people who can read this message. This system is the way to keep your money “thrown” at the casino. How confident and silly he is when he says that “Step One: Get $20,000 dollars”. I highly recommend don’t use this system if you want to keep your money in your pocket.
No negative progressions can work. It's not true they don't affect the house edge. For example positive systems like paroli actually increase the house edge and negative progressions may lower it if done right.
Hitting 24 reds in roulette or lose about 16 hands in blackjack have so low odds that you're not likely to see it in millions of hands or spins. So if someone had a system than can survive 16 straight losses in blackjack he's very likely to be profitable for life. Ofc there's tiny chance he will lose it but most likely not. And if you add things like stopping after 3 losses and waiting for dealer to bust you actually increase amount of hands needed to hit 16 losses so you're even less likely to fail. In most online casinos you have 0.10 limit for online blackjack and live Blackjack that usually have up to 5k limit and much more in vip rooms. so with already big bankroll you can profit from Martingale.
you could technicaly survive 16-17 hands with a 5k bankroll playing 10cents per game (breaking even with loses, if you want that extra unit anyways then it is 15-16 hands) still low bc you would need to win around 130 games to get a daily salary in my country but look at those youtubers with like 50k bankroll, with 1 dollar bets they could get a minimum wage salary in my country in 13 wins with that 17 hand losing protection, its crazy like, daily salary of the day in like an hour and with that extra large loss protection like they say you need to survive at least 7 games with martingale and you have 17 here haha
This system would be a little less stressful on a freebet table...but still 8 hand losing streaks happen and push 22's suck too...but better than losing a high double down
I took 20K to baccarat and used this system at $200 bet until I lost 6 to 7 hands in a row. I was down to my last $12800 bet and I lost it. Before that I was up but I kept going. This system can backfire if you get emotional and scared. I suggest before you play, have a limit of how much you want to win and not play crazy like i did.
Another great video! Hope you guys are practicing "safe social distancing"! How about doing a 3x Martingale vid? Same $15 minimum, 20k bank roll, no splits, no doubles. The pucker factor can kick in fast on that one but you can actually make a lot instead of just getting back your initial bet. (15 , 45, 135, 405, etc.)
Next time when u do martingale do it with a table limit.... it probably won’t go as successful but you atleast can show your viewers how martingale actually plays out
You did well. My personal goal is to reach a total bet of 100 over the next few months. On my daily visits to the casino I will get up after winning 3-5 bets. Thoughts?
Basic strategy is easy... Doesn't help when you keep getting 15 and 16 .. But that's ok I've developed my own doubling system that works pretty good for me.. I would also point out that there a different odds for systems based on your bankroll.risk of ruin or ror goes up considerably when you risk more than 10% on any 1 bet
No... I've played 1000s of hands so the odds start to approach 100% for instance if you play just 1000 hands your odds of losing 7 in a row are nearly 100%
Doesn't work this way in a real casino. Most casinos have a low enough Maximum Bet that would stop you out after losing a number of hands. If that maximum bet limit is $500 for example, and you hit that, you can't double your bet again to $1000 and so on.
That’s why they said theirs a 15-5000$ table at the Wynn I’m Vegas. But yeah local casinos this would never work. I think the max bet high limit where I’m at in Minnesota is 500 . mayyybe 1000 if your lucky
Martingale is absolute garbage! Don’t be tricked if you use this you will lose the shirt off your back! Now with that said Martingale is highly effective in sports betting with plus money odds.
You lose both those doubles and your down 2 grand. And that’s assuming you don’t uo the bet to two 2 thousand the next hand after the double down loss. Which strategy says you do. Then you lose that hand so you have to go 4 grand I guess 🤷🏻♂️and pray. Lose that it’s over. I get it’s not perfect but those big doubles kinda make or break ya.
Timmy hitting the slopes I see how fast he’s dealing
Timmy's scented lube comes in two choices: shame and failure.
With a $20k bankroll I would be tempted to just do a four or five hand Press. $25-$50-$100-$150-$200 then start over. I think you would come out way better.
it's a dangerous system, and people may think that it is a good one watching this, because you were lucky not to have a 8+ losing hands
I mean if you were in a 10-6kspread game and you had like 10.4K on you, you’d have to lose 10 hands in a row to run out of funds
Odds of you losing 8 times in a row is low
@@dylansmith7274 yes it is low, but if you were to actually lose 8 hands, would you be able to handle losing $4000? Compare that to if you win, you would only win $15.
I've lost 11 hands straight before. Luckily I wasn't using this system. Most I've bet using this system was 5$min and biggest bet was 640$. Playing the 5$ table you can lose quite a bit before you start getting into the low thousands. Every time I'd hit Vegas I would spend 3 to 5 hours playing 5$-10$ BJ at whatever casino I happened to be at , using this system, I'd walk away every time with over 300-500$. I would then take 50-100$ and walk around maxing quarter slots, usually wheel of fortune. Id watch to see who had been playing a while and when they'd leave, I'd hit their machine. Ive won so many low/ mid level jackpots that way playing wheel of fortune. But if the machine doesn't start hitting in 3 to 5 plays, I move to the next one. The 50-100 gets spent all on machines after the BJ table. I keep winning chips in my right pocket and the chips/ cash im willing to lose, that I play with in my left pocket. I haven't been to Vegas in 10 years or so and I've heard that they don't use coins in the machines anymore? Everything is on a card now? Man that sounds horrible! I mean I guess I could stick the card in, max bet 3 to 5 times and either keep playing or pull the card and move along but it seems tedious compared to carrying a bucket of quarters or dollar coins and plopping in 3 then hitting the spin button or pulling the wheel. What's everyone's preference? Coins or cards?
@@joshualim3941it’s playing odds, it’s not winning only 15, it’s recovering your losses over and over, you can come up hundreds quick with this method, is there a chance to lose 10 hands perpetually? Of course, you’re gambling, but it’s a good system to win quick.
The great thing about martingale on blackjack is when you hit a blackjack when you are down you get 50% more gains on the same risk. You get way ahead on those, of course that is just a perk and unreliable at best. its all about the slow and steady race and hoping you don't empty your bank before your next win.
I didn’t count how many hands you won but without the huge double on the last hand, if you played a no double, no split Marty, you would have been up around $300 or so which isn’t a bad day of work in what less than 40 minutes. At the table limits you set $15-5000, you would only be able to Marty 9 times. So you’d only need $7,665 to play. Like I said yesterday it’s all about risk tolerance. $20K at 1% apr. is $200 a year! And the probability of losing 9 hands in a row is 1 in 323. If you’re smart, disciplined, get in and get out, you can make money with the Marty.
Brian Dempsey you have a good point. I would modify no split. Only double down on 10 or 11. Thoughts?
Kenneth So I completely understand the want to double or split in hopes of taking advantage of the small edge to win an extra bet. It does make sense. The only problem with it when using the Martingale is that you lose a bet. If you are betting $5, 10, 20 and on that third bet you double to $40 and lose, your next bet is 80. So you went from your third bet right to your fifth bet. Which means you lost a step in your progression. The Marty is based on basically winning one hand out of a certain number of hands. For me, I’d rather have more chances to win that one hand, than winning a few extra units.
Now maybe if you only doubled on your first two bets and if you lost stayed with the progression and just accepted the loss of the doubled be. You can make up 1-2 units quickly but if you lost a doubled let’s say 5th step bet 16 units would be harder to recoup. So for me the risk just isn’t worth the reward. If you play the Marty +1 system you will win 1-4 units for each hand won. That should be plenty, there is no need for the added risk.
Brian Dempsey that’s another great point. Thanks for your feedback👍
I would only double when the dealer doesn't have a 7 or better showing. You need to double to get the odds on the game without it the advantage goes way up for the casino
Let's be real here: You have to double independent how high the bet is, otherwise the house wins more. Also, when you are doubling, you invest your money with a more than 50 percent chance to win. So you won't chase the doubles with martingale, just the base bet. With the splits it is a bit special: lose / lose = double bet, lose / win = keep the same bet, win / win = start over with initial bet. If you double during a split, check whether the split was overall a success, a push or a loose and act accordingly. Thats how I play usually and it makes sense for me.
It's a good system but it is quite risky especially if the shoe goes south. I personally use it but the lower the table limit the better this can work since your doubles can be slower and given more time
Stephen Levine I use it also at a $5-$500 table which gives me 6-7 bets depending on which system I use. Have I lost? Yup. But do I win? Absolutely!
@@briandempsey4291 yeah same for, sometimes I will lose, and other times I win pretty good so I say it's a pretty solid system.
Stephen Levine I agree. It’s solid until it doesn’t work but that goes with every system out there. They all win and they all lose, it’s just about maximizing your wins.
Idk why ppl think this system is dangerous. Play to 6 losses then if u loose #6 go back to #1
Curious about a Martingale 3 and out type system. Only double up 3 times, start back to your initial bet if you lose on the 3rd double
Patrick Flaven you would hate it. Let’s say you start at $5, when you lost 3 hands you’d be down $30. You would need to win 6 hands without losing 3 in a row again just to be even. The limits on tables usually get you 6-8 Marty bets. Trust me, you will want to have the max amount of times you can bet, you will need it. And yes eventually you will lose it all, so be prepared for that.
@@briandempsey4291 What about playing even money until you lose 3 hands in a row then start doubling to a maximum of 3 more times? Seems more reasonable that way
Patrick Flaven the system could be modified in lots of ways. Losing 3 hands in a row still puts you down 3 units, and you will still need 3 wins to make that up. Let’s say you lose 3 $5 bets then double to 10 on your 4th bet and win, your down $10, then you repeat that, now you’re down $20. Eventually you will lose your starting bankroll. The beauty of the Martingale is that you only need to win once to be even for all of your loses and up 1 unit. And it takes a really bad streak for you to lose it all, which do happen. Same with positive progression, you need to have a really good win streak to make that work well. Like a player streak in baccarat. If you won 10 hands in a row and started at $5 and let it ride each time you would have $5120, but as soon as you lose a hand, you’re down $5. Every system out there can win and lose. You just gotta pick one you like and try it out. Go play on the free casino sites and try them all out and see how they work.
Depending on your card strategy, you need to factor in your win percentage. If you are likely to win 33% of the time, you MIGHT get away with it, but the entire principle is about waiting for that single win an reset. If you average a 25% win rate... then you might end up frequency winning after the larger lost. What ever your strategy. Do it 100%. Mixing strategies usually subjects you the disadvantages of those systems while simultaneously removing the advantages of them.
Not fool proof. I spun 21 red on the wheel and the person hit the max then lost he was begging them to raise the limit. It only works with unlimited table max and unlimited bankroll
Tim B. Facts. You can find tables like that but I feel that there very far and few between. Also if you just use math you’ll be okay lol love seeing this stuff cuz people think this works lol
610231718 I was in the the gaming industry for 25 years. I’ve only heard of 1 place where they would give you uncapped limit. You had to bet that the first bet. I’ve seen them give certain players a higher limit but never seen personally any table given no max ever
Tim B. That’s very interesting! Wonder how many people put 25$ down then tried 50$ and was like nope max bet is 25$ haha dry interesting rule thank you for that piece of knowledge I’ll be looking for that infamous table
610231718 I’m not talking about that I’m talking about table max for the casino. The table I was dealing with all the red was a 10k max this particular player could go to 15k . He was begging for 30k if they would’ve been able to bet that 30k he would’ve lost that too.
But what if that person paused every 3 reds, in other words you lose 3 you wait for your color then you continue. I did some simulations and I never reached more than 10 double downs but I assumed I need a bankroll for at least 12.
Skip the Martingale and use the Stearn 3.0 And to be fair you really should be playing perfect Black Jack... Splitting, Doubling and surrendering regardless of where you are in the system. Play at a Quarter table buy in for $3,250 and walk when you are up $500. You will not always win... but over a 1,000 try sample I have a losing session 1 in every 10 sessions. So 9 wins @$500 = $4,500 minus 1 lose @ #3,250 you net on average $1,250 a day when you play 10 sessions a day.
can you please try the 1 - 2. . . 1 - 2 - 4 Betting System
Explanation:
The way it works is you bet 1 unit, if that bet wins you increase your bet to 2 units. If your second bet wins, you go back down to playing one unit. If your first or second bet loses, you go right to the 1 - 2 - 4 betting sequence, One that sequence is completed you go back down to the 1 - 2,
Thank you so much
Sounds dumb. You're not only wasting your money but your time as well.
For those people who can read this message. This system is the way to keep your money “thrown” at the casino. How confident and silly he is when he says that “Step One: Get $20,000 dollars”. I highly recommend don’t use this system if you want to keep your money in your pocket.
I would like to see this martingale with adding $15 for every double down so that you are always getting $15 a hand no matter what
How many deck are you guys playing with now??
Martingale doesn’t work unless there’s no table limit lmao.... a very dangerous system aswell
No negative progressions can work. It's not true they don't affect the house edge. For example positive systems like paroli actually increase the house edge and negative progressions may lower it if done right.
Hitting 24 reds in roulette or lose about 16 hands in blackjack have so low odds that you're not likely to see it in millions of hands or spins. So if someone had a system than can survive 16 straight losses in blackjack he's very likely to be profitable for life. Ofc there's tiny chance he will lose it but most likely not. And if you add things like stopping after 3 losses and waiting for dealer to bust you actually increase amount of hands needed to hit 16 losses so you're even less likely to fail. In most online casinos you have 0.10 limit for online blackjack and live Blackjack that usually have up to 5k limit and much more in vip rooms. so with already big bankroll you can profit from Martingale.
Since every casino I've played at has a table limit that prevents 7'th, 8'th, or 9'th double, good luck finding one.......
you could technicaly survive 16-17 hands with a 5k bankroll playing 10cents per game (breaking even with loses, if you want that extra unit anyways then it is 15-16 hands) still low bc you would need to win around 130 games to get a daily salary in my country but look at those youtubers with like 50k bankroll, with 1 dollar bets they could get a minimum wage salary in my country in 13 wins with that 17 hand losing protection, its crazy like, daily salary of the day in like an hour and with that extra large loss protection like they say you need to survive at least 7 games with martingale and you have 17 here haha
btw i did the math and the odds of you losing 17 times are 0.000763% by the time that happens you probably already profited a ton
Question of the Video: That face is when Alex has just sat down to do another muckbang spread. Keep up the videos and stay safe.
This dealer is cracked lol relax homie 😂
This system would be a little less stressful on a freebet table...but still 8 hand losing streaks happen and push 22's suck too...but better than losing a high double down
Crazy how by having that bank you could make the daily minimum wage of my country in 1 win lmao
Aren't you allowed to double for less?
I took 20K to baccarat and used this system at $200 bet until I lost 6 to 7 hands in a row. I was down to my last $12800 bet and I lost it. Before that I was up but I kept going. This system can backfire if you get emotional and scared. I suggest before you play, have a limit of how much you want to win and not play crazy like i did.
@ 2:10 shoulda coulda woulda😂
$10 start. It would pay off if by chance you lost 6hands in a row. 10-20-40-80-160-320. Then 640 hits blackjack
I thought Slippery Timmy sounded familiar. I have been listening to his channel for longer than CQ and CEG.
Martingale is like that bad day every now and then. Its all fun and games until you hit that 0.12% 10 loss streak and gg college funds 😀
@KANE
Oh yeah?...
@KANE it's not impossible but unlikely and tables have upper limits.
I'm digging the martingale! When/if the casinos reopen I'm so trying this system
they literally tell you the exact opposite in this video
Super sick video either way
Use it since 1992 .. Just Work the Table Limits ! Good Dealer 💫
Hi , saludos desde México , me encanta su canal es muy divertido me la paso muy bn viéndolos
I wonder if there’s a max bet per table?
Lean Coprado I’ve seen limits on some. On all the cruise ships I’ve been on they’re usually like 500$ max bet per hand.
Casinos love Martingale players because they will eventually lose it all.
You will lose it all no matter what because you lose portion of your bankroll every hand and eventually you will lose it all.
Your absoluly right！They are super friendly to Martingale players. It‘s not out of the kindness of their hearts
Another great video! Hope you guys are practicing "safe social distancing"!
How about doing a 3x Martingale vid? Same $15 minimum, 20k bank roll, no splits, no doubles. The pucker factor can kick in fast on that one but you can actually make a lot instead of just getting back your initial bet. (15
, 45,
135,
405, etc.)
Timmy did 3x martingale baccarat a while back.
Next time when u do martingale do it with a table limit.... it probably won’t go as successful but you atleast can show your viewers how martingale actually plays out
riized he said the table limits are the same as the Wynn Casino $15-$5000 when he started.
go to a diff game when you hit the table limits. high limit baccarat you'll get your money back.
You did well. My personal goal is to reach a total bet of 100 over the next few months. On my daily visits to the casino I will get up after winning 3-5 bets. Thoughts?
That's stop loss and it doesn't work. Its all one long blackjack session unless you get up and never play again
Hey guys love your videos love see a no hitting on a bustable hand virses the perfect play stradagee n please forgive my spelling hope to visit
I luv playing MG but I’ve lost 9MG in a row multiple times so eventually it always catches up to you
MG + NB + quit when you reach a profit that's 10% of your bankroll. Don't be greedy and you'll leave with the casino's money 90% of the time.
@@sblivinintxs6297 what’s nb? System?
@@bigbusiness87 No Bust
I have a system which will enhance the martingale method...
Tell
We need a system for them smaller tables with max bet of $250
I've lost 16 in a row before. ..
So no I would probably get hit first time out..
you can get attack by a Polar bear in a desert.
either your basic system concept is all wrong or you're just damn unlucky. I think the latter is less likely to be honest.
Basic strategy is easy...
Doesn't help when you keep getting 15 and 16 ..
But that's ok I've developed my own doubling system that works pretty good for me..
I would also point out that there a different odds for systems based on your bankroll.risk of ruin or ror goes up considerably when you risk more than 10% on any 1 bet
so you basically hitted a 0.000763% chance or you are not good at blackjack
No...
I've played 1000s of hands so the odds start to approach 100% for instance if you play just 1000 hands your odds of losing 7 in a row are nearly 100%
Martingale sucks so bad, table limit......
martingale seems okay
Doesn't work this way in a real casino. Most casinos have a low enough Maximum Bet that would stop you out after losing a number of hands. If that maximum bet limit is $500 for example, and you hit that, you can't double your bet again to $1000 and so on.
That’s why they said theirs a 15-5000$ table at the Wynn I’m Vegas. But yeah local casinos this would never work. I think the max bet high limit where I’m at in Minnesota is 500 . mayyybe 1000 if your lucky
@@bigbusiness87 my local casino it's 5000 Max at all tables high and low limit, but they have one upstairs which much higher limits but a high minimum
@@ratataran dang that’s rare, at least in MN. Where is that at?
9 losses in a row starting with 15$ and your 20k is blown
No, that's only about 7500.
Graham Stephen is da man
No one used 20.000.00 to make 15.00 a hand
But if you did... you would be up 12% in 30 minutes. Sounds genius to me
ALWAYS DOUBLE 11.... you would be up more thank $1K and could walk. That's what you were waiting for... not $15 profit per win.
That's greed, my friend. Do the math. :/
Very very risky system, you risk more money than you hope win
Martingale is absolute garbage! Don’t be tricked if you use this you will lose the shirt off your back! Now with that said Martingale is highly effective in sports betting with plus money odds.
Why have the flat better ? What is the point of him. Just for extra win 🤷🏻♂️
No I would not buy in with 20,000$ when I have seen many people win about that much buying in with like 300$
Try this evert time you lose you dubbel and if you win you go back to the begin i ust this strategy
thats martingale lmao
Can you Martingale on a slot machine?
Sure, just put your money in a shredder
@@ratataran 😳🤣🤣
There is no system or strategy can beat the house the best system is do not gamble.
Not true. What is true is martingale is a suicide mission tho lol
Anyone ever see "Vegas Vacation" and think that this is where #slipperyTimmy actually learned to deal BJ?
ua-cam.com/video/cvH34nJ7EFE/v-deo.html
11 vs 10 isnt a double with basic strategy
yes it is
Yes it is...you always go dbl if you have 11
Where you learn that bs?
table limit MAX
you can change tables tho
I Martingale the field numbers in Craps all the time.
Just the Field?
@@jordanfranklin189 Well, maybe the pass line etc. LOL.
You lose both those doubles and your down 2 grand. And that’s assuming you don’t uo the bet to two 2 thousand the next hand after the double down loss. Which strategy says you do. Then you lose that hand so you have to go 4 grand I guess 🤷🏻♂️and pray. Lose that it’s over. I get it’s not perfect but those big doubles kinda make or break ya.
Genius!
I love it
6
First comment and like 👍🏻
🎰
never play bj , its a house game .. play baccarat ists a player game
This system is better with no table limit betting. Most Casinos they have a table limit. Intuation is the best stratigy.
Intuition is the best strategy... :-) :-) LOLOLOL