Prehistoric Planet 2 - SEASON REVIEW (Did it Hit the Mark?)

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 9 лют 2025
  • Season 2 review!

КОМЕНТАРІ •

  • @DinoGuy8
    @DinoGuy8  Рік тому +15

    There is SO much more I can say about this season. All in all, a step up in accuracy, quality, etc. From smaller animals getting the spotlight, to the creature designs (a lot of which were designed by Gabriel Ugueto, whom is one of my favorite paleoartists). But for sake of brevity, these are my basic thoughts of the show. I would love to talk about it more in the very near future.

    • @abodabo65
      @abodabo65 Рік тому

      love your videos i think im getting inspired to make a dino channel and show stuff about dinosaurs thank you

  • @TheVengefulVadam
    @TheVengefulVadam Рік тому +15

    Phenomenal season. My only gripe that I also had for S1 was the lack of sharks. You'd think they would include a few considering when people think of the oceans, they think of sharks. Seeing a shark get eaten by a larger Mosasaur would have been a no-brainer introduction to the Mosasaurs (although personally I would have liked to see sharks just doing their thing like with the rest of the creatures on the show). I would have also liked an adult Pyroraptor. I literally went 👀when I heard its name.

  • @joshuavis2736
    @joshuavis2736 Рік тому +15

    It’s a bit of a shame that we got less time in the second season but it was well paced which I’m glad about. It was also good to have the uncovered segments in the episodes as it really helps the education part of the documentary but it is a bit of a shame that the episodes were shorter, they could’ve had an extra segment or more time for each segment

  • @alexmerguie4688
    @alexmerguie4688 Рік тому +1

    It may not have much content as season 1, but it did make up for it with twice the amount of uncovered.

  • @archosaur_enjoyer824
    @archosaur_enjoyer824 Рік тому +4

    Simosuches is a pug mix with a croc
    I would keep it as a pet tbh

  • @Cody38Super
    @Cody38Super Рік тому +1

    What's made both seasons great is its animals being animals!!!!!! Not Jurassic Fight Club horse$hit. I can only hope we get another 2 or 3 seasons, atleast.

  • @MourningCoffeeMusic
    @MourningCoffeeMusic Рік тому +2

    It took everything that made the first season great and then some !

  • @abodabo65
    @abodabo65 Рік тому +1

    close to 1k subs keep up the great work

  • @bkjeong4302
    @bkjeong4302 Рік тому +4

    I’d argue Season 2 was overall a slight improvement on Season 1.

  • @kevinyan6079
    @kevinyan6079 Рік тому +1

    i liked season one better as a whole, but season two has some of my fav moments, like the Isisaurus segment.

  • @mikeilles6427
    @mikeilles6427 Рік тому +6

    This season was a much better improvement than season 1, this series will never reach the heights that Walking with Dinosaurs did if this is the same route they are taking, playing it waaay to safe and limited. So if anything it did not hit the mark, more so it's closer to the mark but not hitting it.

  • @elainemaguire2269
    @elainemaguire2269 Рік тому

    Good review, on a great show. :) One note though, the pack hunting may not be quite as speculative as you think.. seeing as both wolves and some big cats, like lions, work together to make traps. Dinos weren't stupid! lol and although certainly speculative, there's no reason to think that they weren't intelligent enough to work together.

  • @rosastephens8966
    @rosastephens8966 Рік тому +2

    Great review! Thanks

  • @the_death_phantom533
    @the_death_phantom533 Рік тому +2

    Just to be clear, the "Velociraptors" in the show aren't actual Velociraptors, they're based on indeterminate velociraptorine remains from the Maastrichtian age and were called Velociraptors in the show for simplicity and to support the idea that they may represent a third species of Velociraptor. The "Velociraptors" were depicted as opportunistic hunters, "partly social" animals that moved and possibly hunted in numbers of two to three members or more. Possibly the ones in the Badlands episode were a family group which could be an explanation as well.

    • @DinoGuy8
      @DinoGuy8  Рік тому

      The fact of the matter is that they were made as Velociraptors for the general public. A Velociraptorine doesn't equal the genus Velociraptor the same way a Triceratops isn't called Chasmosaurus on account of it being a Chasmosaurine. And the fact it doesn't represent a true Velociraptor is never made clear in the show, nor bonus content. Documentaries I hold to higher standards than regular media.
      And I've heard the opportunistic idea for this behavior, but it's simply just pack behavior shown because the audience is used to it from Dromeaosaurs. Their inclusion is in no way a deal breaker, but they are based off of indeterminate finds, and were really just a way for them to have their cake and eat it too.

    • @BigAl2-u7e
      @BigAl2-u7e Рік тому

      I mean, there are a lot of Velociraptor-like things from the Maastrichtian of Mongolia, and some of them could just straight up be different species of Velociraptor. We just gotta wait for the scientists to describe them.
      Edit: Not to mention, doesn't Velociraptor count as a Maastrichtian dinosaur? Velociraptor lived 75 to 71 million years ago, while the Maastrichtian is 72 to 66 million years ago. That means that it is age appropriate as it lives during the time PP is set.

    • @the_death_phantom533
      @the_death_phantom533 Рік тому

      @@BigAl2-u7e The only other velociraptorine from the same location in the Nemegt as the "Velociraptors" is Adasaurus, but it's larger and has a more blunter toe claw.

    • @BigAl2-u7e
      @BigAl2-u7e Рік тому

      @the_death_phantom5332
      You do realize that animals have huge ranges, right?
      Not to mention, the Nemegt and Djadochta are like right next to each other.
      Edit: Also, you completely missed what I even said. There are a lot of Velociraptor-like undescribed fossils from Mongolia. So things that aren't described new species, genera, or fossils of already existing species/genera.

    • @the_death_phantom533
      @the_death_phantom533 Рік тому

      @@BigAl2-u7e I was referring to the ones in the Nemegt specifically, because that's where these "Velociraptors" are living in.

  • @tyrannotherium7873
    @tyrannotherium7873 Рік тому +12

    SEASON 2 was much better

    • @Mr.Pteranodon
      @Mr.Pteranodon Рік тому +1

      I do not agree but 100% enjoyed season 2

  • @MonsieurFeshe
    @MonsieurFeshe Рік тому +1

    unfortunately season 2 still didn't give any focus on fish. Xiphactinus is SUCH A COOL ANIMAL, SO MUCH MORE SUCCESSFUL THAN MOSASAURS, AND WHAT DID THEY GIVE IT?.... It ate some fish, ate a bird or two, then ate itself.... Fish are just so disrespected man.

  • @nightfuryman1209
    @nightfuryman1209 Рік тому +2

    I feel like Prehistoric Planet season 2 should’ve focused on a different period in earth’s history instead of the Cretaceous
    I really wanted a season set only in the late Permian period but what we still got was fine, I just hope AppleTv+ doesn’t only saw Prehistoric Planet as marketable just because it was set in the Maastrichtian age of the late Cretaceous
    Because then it wouldn’t be called Prehistoric Planet at all since Prehistoric literally means the entirety of earths natural history and not just the late Cretaceous period
    It would be sad if they stick to the late Cretaceous going forward to future seasons of this show because it would just be called Cretaceous Planet and not Prehistoric Planet
    I pray that if we do get a season 3 it’s set in a different time period or different Era in earth’s history

    • @juanyusee8197
      @juanyusee8197 Рік тому

      Both Seasons 1 and 2 were made about the same time TBF, hence the return to the Maastrichtian setting.

    • @ilyadratutin6385
      @ilyadratutin6385 Рік тому

      Spermian 😂😮🎉😆😆👌🥹🥹😂😂😂👌❤️❤️😄😄😄😂👌👌😆🥲😃😅😅😄😄😄🥲🥲🥲😺😼😄❤️😆😆☝🏽☝🏽☝🏽🙌🏾🙌🏾🙌🏾🙌🏾🙌🏾🖕🏿🖕🏿👋🏽✌🏿✌🏿✌🏿🤜🤜🫸🏾👆☝🏽🫴🏿🖐️🖐️🖐️🖐️🖐️

  • @tonybusch8771
    @tonybusch8771 Рік тому +1

    Let’s just hope it was.

  • @zadas1132
    @zadas1132 Рік тому

    One thing I wish they did was showcase other time periods. Another flaw I noticed is that they kinda just rush the segments, and go from one thing to the next, with some biomes not even being accurate to the actual episode name. At least they toned down on the mating segments. But other than that... not much to say about season 2 really.

  • @Gus_Max
    @Gus_Max Рік тому +1

    Could you do a video on the austroraptor? I was really interested in that one

  • @Gus_Max
    @Gus_Max Рік тому +1

    Can you do opinions on prehistoric kingdom animals?

  • @ToxicPancake88
    @ToxicPancake88 Рік тому

    Would love for them to step out of the Cretaceous period for future seasons though. For a show called “prehistoric planet” it seems to focus on a very small and already overplayed period of prehistory.