LOL it’s not that bad but maybe if you needed to do a bunch of partition management it would be cumbersome? The interface seems a little wonky compared to Calamares but I had no problem getting through it personally
I went with Fedora because of the installer. I needed a RAID setup and when it comes to unorthodox setups Red Hat has made it way easier, and it shows by a mile. Test yourself, try to set up RAID or some other atypical setup on Arch, Manjaro, what have you, and on Fedora its the easiest. Have to say though, the bleeding edge repo's on Arch though is light years ahead of Fedora, and I sincerely miss them.
I feel like having vanilla GNOME is one of Fedora's strongest advantages over other distributions. I absolutely use extensions, but I'd rather be the one choosing them and having a clean install out of the box. My extensions are just, like, hiding the top bar unless I'm in the overview, adding a middle click to close windows in the overview, a couple minor menu tweaks, things like that. I don't want my distribution to hack a Start menu or persistent dock paradigm onto a DE that's fundamentally not designed for it and is, frankly, much better than other DE's strictly because of its overview paradigm.
You will always struggle to convince me that Gnome in its vanilla form is a user-friendly or newbie friendly desktop environment. I'm just an old-fashioned (and old lol) mouse point and click sort of person. I don't 'want' to change, I don't 'want' to learn a new and different desktop paradigm. To me, personally, Gnome is a bit like Arch, it's better for people who are technologically competent and who enjoy fiddling with their systems to get them exactly where they want to be. And, I understand that Gnome probably is really good for people who use their computers for 'work'. For the basic, simple, day to day computer user who likes using a mouse and a GUI, I could never recommend either Gnome or any 'pure' version of Arch... just too high maintenance... IMO :) Oh, the Gnome exceptions are Zorin Core and perhaps Manjaro Gnome... for 'me' :) And the only version of Arch I will ever use is Manjaro. I follow a few simple rules on Manjaro and so far it's always been good for me (I'm talking stable for years now as a basic user) - I avoid the AUR if at all possible, I stick to an LTS kernel wherever possible, and I always do major updates in TTY rather than on the desktop itself. Maybe one day I'll come unstuck on Manjaro... I also accept that nothing is perfect :) DEs and distros are very much an individual user thing and probably always will be. Manjaro and Fedora ARE my two favourite distros, Cinnamon is my favourite DE, it does everything that 'I' need it to do :) Oh, I don't mind Mint and MX either... and Zorin :)
This all started on Fedora 32, since then it went from meh, to surprisingly good, to the best distro for EVERYONE. Coders, scripters, everyday users, whatever you want to do, Fedora is for you. Hats off to Fedora and their developers, every release they set the bar higher for everyone
I couldn't agree more. Linus from LTT kept knocking Fedora as a meme but he really missed out on a stable user friendly distro. Personally I use arch but my wife and mother are both using fedora and I'm debating about switching back as I'm getting a bit tired of random things breaking and like you said... most things have an RPM or flatpak version nowadays.
Believe me been on arch for a long time, it's not worth it. There is more to love on Fedora. Yes, it's on arch first, but you don't need to manually switch to latest new thing as it will come by default with a new release. Think of pipewire. It's manual work on arch and meanwhile on Fedora pulseaudio will automatically be swapped after an update. And you can be quite certain that the switch won't be rushed or unstable.
I switched to linux ater the LTT videos and everything i learned since then tells me linus was an absolute idiot. He made the worst possible decisions at every step, almost like he wanted to point out bugs and scare his nooby audience/create drama rather than try to make it work.
@@kanishcktewatia597 I've been gaming on Linux for quite some time now, and to be completely fair, they did make some good points in that series. The truth is, is that Linux isn't Windows, and it's easy to forget that in terms of games, we are often jumping through a compatibility and translation layer to get those games to work. There are challenges associated with that. The trouble comes in when people expect Linux to behave just like Windows, and close their mind to learning a new way of thinking about things. Those people tend to have a very very hard time. And Linus seemed to be a little stuck in that rut during his segments. There are elements of the Linux experience that need work, and elements that should be made more accessible, but Linux doesn't need to be like Windows to be great. I think a lot of folks get stuck on that.
Been using fedora since fedora 32, and it has been an amazing experience. The biggest hassle I faced was the extension support when gnome went from version 3.38 to 40, I had to wait months, or find a replacement for most of the extensions I used. Other than that, It has been great. Having nothing but a small bar on top is so much better for my productivity.
I've been on Fedora since the early 20's release. The only update that was unbearable was F26 because of the kernel 4.4 and the Nvidia GPU issues.Immediately after that, It has been flawless.
Those Ubuntu 10.10 clips gave me nostalgia and reminded me of why I used to love it so much. I loved Unity too. Good for Canonical for being able to turn a profit, but maybe it would be better if they exited the desktop space. Or make Ubuntu Desktop a full community project.
@@AdiPrimandaGinting Correct, it is not completely community run, but it is largely community managed, Fedora is run by the Fedora Council (great name btw), which is made up of members of both the community and Red Hat Employees. The Council Chair is selected by Red Hat and approved by the Fedora Council. The idea is to let Fedora function independently but make sure it stays on a path where it can act as upstream for RHEL. Contrast with Ubuntu, which is made in house by canonical.
@@dstinnettmusic Not correct on Ubuntu part. Ubuntu is like the fruit of labor between community and Canonical although I think Canonical has always have more power being the financier of the project. Ubuntu community has its own community structure with community council and technical board being on top. Although from your comment, I think Fedora community has more power than Ubuntu community in deciding the life of their respective distro.
After building my first desktop PC in 20+ years, and trying Ubuntu first... I ultimately went with Fedora 35 + Windows 10. Fedora's been working great, and the most annoying thing so far (which is completely surface-level) is that OpenRGB requires a bit more work to get it running on Fedora. And sometimes other packages assume you use a Debian derived OS, and you have to compile or manually install something on Fedora.
Great to see that you landed on Fedora! I'm a RX600XT user on F35 myself and it's great. You should read up on dnf as the package manger, it has some awesome features like downloading rpms (or cloning full on repos), rolling back transactions based on a bash like history, not breaking over a wonky ssh connection (not great on apt ....), updating the repos without running update and installing rpms directly from URLs with depency check and everything.
Packaging would be my main concern for switching to Fedora as well. I think of it as probably a cooler distro than Ubuntu, but less effortlessly practical due to not being the default/most mainstream choice. I also don't want to learn a new package manager and package repo/package ecosystem... Hmm.
@@MrSmitheroons it's actually not hard at all. Instead of debs you have rpms that you can install with dnf install ./my.rpm . To do all other stuff it's quite similar to apt, you just don't need to update the repos all the time, dnf does it automatically. So to update use dnf update. And if you want to install software from the repos use dnf install xyz. That's it. All of that can also be done in gnome software, so don't be afraid.
I agree 100%. I've been on Fedora KDE for several months and I feel like it's my new long-term distro; no more temptation to distro-hop! It's great for users, and it's great for developing on top of. And the KDE version is not a second-class citizen! The worst feature is the installer, but hopefully you'll only have to see it once...
@@4n0nmann5 Some of us do. But Neon Unstable is actually better for QA than development. For development, you generally build everything from source yourself (because you're hacking on it), so you don't need a distro in which everything is built from source every day for you. For developers it's more inortant that supporting software libraries are kept up to date, and for this a rolling release distro or semi-rolling distro like Fedora is better. But Neon Unstable is quite useful for dedicated QA people, bug triagers, etc.
@@ps5hasnogames55 Yes, Fedora KDE does need to 'modernize' some of their 'older' apps into newer and more viable ones... but, you can still elect to use X11 rather than Wayland at the login screen. Still, not sure if that is really Fedora's fault with the apps or KDE's fault :)
You speak exactly from my soul. I've been using Fedora for a few years and the system runs and runs. I don't have to fix anything all the time. I would only change three things about Fedora: Flathub directly integrated Offer RPM Fusion completely as a third-party source. Installer also for beginners (but they're already working on that).
I 100% agree with everything you said here. Fedora is awesome because its not bleeding edge but is current. Provides stock desktop and apps instead of bloated messes. And uses the godly Flatpaks by default along with Wayland, Pipewire, etc. It's like legitimately my ideal distro. Fedora's only weakness is its installer. If it adopted the Elementary/PopOS installer it would be god-tier.
I like this channel a lot. The exact stuff I want to know in order to move to another distro as my daily driver is covered here. I wish I had more time to experiment with more distros but as a freelance web dev time gets scarse 😞, however I agree and share these feelings of Ubuntu and after using it for years I'll move to fedora and feel excited about the experience of working on it full time and see how it goes. Thanks for that!.
In my experience Fedora is one of the best distribution. I like the default features, the look and feel, and the stability. Especially when developing applications, the performance is perfect. But, the only issue that I faced is some libraries being incompatible when working with machine learning. Ubuntu has a bigger community when talking about ML, which comes in handy when I get stuck on something related to libraries and packages dependencies.
I've been saying this for a while. Fedora is my new goto recommendation for new users. It "just works*" more than Ubuntu far more often for me. Flatpaks by default is also good for letting new users avoid the terminal.
Linus level sponsor segues, love it Everyone: You should put everything on your desktop in a folder Me: but the desktop is a folder Everyone: ... You aren't wrong, but I hate you
but in some distributions the system adds icons dynamically to the desktop (usb...), if all your stuff is in a single subfolder, the system icons will be much easier to find/see ... imo
Don't forget that Fedora Server with Cockpit is also an amazing experience! Makes me wonder why people got all mad about the CentOS switch (I mean I know why they got mad, but still)
Two years ago, i hopped from Ubuntu to Fedora after finally having had enough of outdated Ubuntu repos, and I never looked back. And like you said, despite the cutting-edge mentality, Fedora has been rock-solid for me since day 1.
Both Fedora 36 and Ubuntu 22.04, which both will be released in April, include GNOME 42, which itself was released on March 23. I'm glad to see Ubuntu devs are starting to prioritize the implementation of the latest GNOME versions. It's probably thanks to distros like Fedora that give Ubuntu a little wakeup call and make them compete harder.
I wanted to dip my toes in the 'immutable filesystem' OS waters. After surveying the landscape, chose Fedora Silverblue to try mainly because it defaults to GNOME (bonus that Fedora tracks the GNOME release cadence; note, Fedora Kinoite is the KDE spin of Silverblue). So, I installed Fedora Silverblue in a VM and was pleased to find that its defaults are things that I'd normally need to configure myself like btrfs w/compression, zram, /tmp on in-RAM tmpfs, a release-tracking Linux kernel, etc. Finding toolbox was also a pleasant surprise, as it makes using containers for running apps & doing software development super easy. Flatpak wasn't much of a consideration but it'll be nice to have fresh apps with no dependency problems. I was tired of maintaining franken-buntu & franken-debian installations, so after a trial run on some older hardware and finding Firefox pre-configured for Wayland (Intel graphics) and buttery smooth, I made the jump to Fedora Silverblue as my main desktop OS. Adding RPM Fusion's libva-intel-driver & ffmpg-libs was an easy fix for hardware video decode for Firefox. So yeah, I think Fedora is quickly becoming the new Ubuntu.
I've been preaching this like a madman for a while now ! All these ubuntu based distros should really consider rebasing themselves on Fedora, if that's even possible. I think a Fedora based PopOS, Mint or Elementary would be great and would reduce the workload of distro mantainers trying compensate for the Ubuntu LTS delay when implementing new teck and updating packages. It would also would help pull more people into working on the teck that's trully driving Linux desktop towards the future.
well, Mint is not going to use Fedora, as their backup option is pure Debian (check LMDE) still, Pop!_OS on Fedora would be great considering the fact it's a quite good gaming distro
@@erned8445 If Mint used Fedora as their base they wouldn't 'need' to have LMDE as a back up. I prefer LMDE to Mint Cinnamon these days anyway, lighter, faster and more stable.
Basically Ubuntu needs to drop all of its Snaps and one-off customizations and become an APT-based version of Fedora-a constant, vanilla, cutting-edge release without an LTS every 2 years to slow it down. Then produce a completely separate, biannual distro called Ubuntu LTS that incorporates the features from the mainline distro that have proven to be stable. Ubuntu needs to do this, because right now the “perfect distro” for beginners really doesn’t exist. Fedora is DARN close, but they still fall short with auto-signing kernel modules for secure boot. DNF is also really great-better than APT frankly-but 90% of online forums and UA-cam tutorials assume APT is being used.
@@emjaycee I don't think Fedora base would be something that's in line with Mint's vision - to be nothing but stability and ease to use. especially minding that Fedora utilises Anaconda installer, which might be confusing to the beginner, comparing to Ubiquity.
@@erned8445 Mint could use any installer they want. I know the Ubiquity and/or Calamares installer is simpler, but I actually like the new LMDE5 installer of all of them. As far as stability goes, I think Fedora is significantly more stable than what Ubuntu offers these days. The Debian base is very stable, but Debian also has its limitations. I do agree with you though that the Fedora base probably isn't in Mint's vision... doesn't mean it shouldn't be though :) If Mint used Fedora's standard package base and then added what is included in RPM Fusion (like Ultramarine does), they would have everything they need. Some of Mint's special GUI apps would 'probably' translate across pretty well. I'm sure it would be a lot of work to make the transition, but if they are looking to the future, it probably should be under consideration. And just add in the latest LTS kernel every 6 months and you'd be set :)
Btw "typing the name of the app I want" is usually just typing 2 or 3 letters of the name .The shell learns your commonly used apps and will highlight those selections. Also you don't even need to know the name: "ph..." will bring up a selection of photo related apps such as shotwell and GIMP
Glad to see Fedora getting the love it deserves. Fedora is amazingly stable for a semi-rolling release style distro, and it has been amazing for gaming.
@@babyboomertwerkteam5662 On Fedora, you get regular app updates (not just bugfixes (like on Debian) but real updates to newer versions) even within a version cycle. You even get regular kernel updates within a version cycle. Compared to Debian which sticks with the same LTS versions of their apps for two years. So when compared to Debian, Fedora can be seen as semi-rolling.
@@sebKern91 The amount of updates you get isn't what makes a distro "rolling" or not. Rolling releases pull from the same repositories forever and never branch into different versions. It doesn't matter if the distro freezes on one app version like Debian or gives you new app versions during a release like Fedora - if the distro has multiple versions, it by definition cannot be considered a rolling release. I should also mention that you're not guaranteed to get new app versions on one version of Fedora - this is especially true with desktop environments - each version of Fedora stays on one version of its desktop per release with the only exception being KDE due to its release schedule and buggier nature, and even then typically only one upgrade is allowed per Fedora version, with very rare exceptions (for example, Fedora 35 got two Plasma upgrades, but it was only because Plasma 5.23 couldn't be thoroughly tested in time for its release so Fedora 35 had to ship with Plasma 5.22.5 on release). Fedora's stable update policy for apps specifically disallows updating apps and libraries if they change the user interface or API, with only some exceptions (web browsers for example), and all new app versions are putt through testing before they're released to Fedora's repositories. If an app doesn't pass testing, it gets delayed until it's fixed, or it doesn't get shipped. Kernel versions for example; major versions do not get shipped until there's been about 2 weeks of testing. Also, there is a rolling version of Fedora called Rawhide, but it's experimental (to the point where even the kernel is straight off Linus Torvalds' git master branch) and isn't intended for anyone other than developers.
Fedora “just works”, which is good insofar as it keeps you focused on your work and the system is very stable. It’s a downside when you want to dig into the inner workings of the system. I love Fedora on my laptop, where the trackpad gestures and streamlined UI really take advantage of that device’s hardware. However for my desktop I’m sticking with Endeavour+KDE for now since it is more pleasant to customize to my liking, and KDE has a lot of useful features and powerful stock apps.
I'd use Fedora Gnome myself, but currently using EndeavourOS Gnome with pacman and AUR, and the EndeavourOS community its just so good I can't imagine using anything else right now.
I've been using Fedora KDE, and it's really solid. A good in-between for those getting into Linux and power users that don't like the instability that Arch can have at times. It even has a UEFI boot logo screen, which is nice from a polish perspective. Only downside is that there's no option in the installer for Fedora KDE to automatically install NVIDIA Drivers, Flatpak, and RPMFusion.
Yeah, the default no third party packages can be a pain, but I think since it’s sponsored and basically owned by red hat, there might be some legal issues when hosting the software versus giving the software in a repo for you to install afterwards. That’s what a red hatter told me from the legal side of things.
@@ps5hasnogames55 Could just uninstall those pieces of software. Or just install regular Fedora, install KDE Plasma, and then remove the GNOME portion of it. So far, I've had less issues with that than KDE on Arch for example, which doesn't even install packagekit-qt5 by default, leading to Discover and a lot of stuff not working.
@@ps5hasnogames55 Not necessarily. It's more like the KDE Desktop environment option used for archinstall installs Discover by default without installing the dependencies that are required to use it. I definitely do agree that distributions should be more lightweight, and that Fedora should just give the option of installing an alternate desktop environment from the installer image rather than relying on a third-party for a good OOB experience. Manjaro from my experience is way more bloated than this spin of Fedora though, although that's not really saying much.
Interesting to hear that. In the past, I read about some people having issues with Fedora KDE. I read that the KDE spin isn't as well polished as the Gnome version. But if it's now stable, maybe I should give it a try. I currently use Fedora Gnome but I'm thinking about switching back to KDE. Gnome 41 is great but still I sometimes think that KDE is better suited for me. In the past, I used KDE neon, but with its Ubuntu LTS base, it has problems with outdated software. For example, you get a rather old version of the Flatpak platform, thus some apps like Eclipse won't work. You get old kernels, lacking features like proper NTFS support (kernel 5.15) or support for the Nintendo Switch controller (kernel 5.16). Pulseaudio showed some instabilities, while in Fedora, you get PipeWire, which just works fine (even with effect programs like EasyEffects). So I think about installing Fedora KDE anytime soon.
I still have to install dash to panel, input output device picker and a few other extensions. Stock gnome is perfectly usable and i feel like casual users would love it, but when it comes to getting stuff done, a taskbar will always be the best option for me. It also gives you the ability to switch workspaces with the mouse wheel hover the taskbar, and the ability to isolate them, which stock gnome doesn't do. What's the point of workspaces if the apps running in each are not separate instances?
@@maxarendorff6521 I don't like KDE. KDE feels worse than windows to me. Gnome is so sleek and starts off so barebones. Thats what I want, and then add stuff as I seee fit. 90 percent of apps and prebuilt stuff on KDE distros I don't want. I also don't like many of their apps that start with K
@@maxarendorff6521 like I really really don't like KDE. The settings app, the way the whole thing is basically. The only two things I like is they let you change default file manager and dolphin s "extract here" "extract to seperate folder" context menu options. Other than that there is nothing that I like about KDE. Xfce is much much better and gnome is the best
You should switch from virtualbox to virt-manager then you could play with pci-passthrough (note: chose windows as the machine install type even installing linux for pci passthrough) And You can do this with one video card if you have another machine you can use to connect to it using x2go.
@@TheLinuxEXP yeah especially since VirtualBox needs uses dkms and has to build the kernel modules on every kernel update... And dkms modules tend to break, sooner or later. I tried VB for some time for vagrant but VB is just terrible software imho and just completely switched libvirt for vagrant as well. Gnome boxes and virt-manager ftw. To see your boxes VMs you only need to add the libvirt user session in virt-manager. And virt-manager really isn't hard to use!
In my experience of using Fedora, the installation was more awkward than others, but the main issue for me is that performance was noticeably slower compared with Debian/Ubuntu based distros, such as Kubuntu, Mint, MX Linux, Neon, Feren etc.
Great video.. glad I subscribed.. I'm looking forward to trying out this Linux version.. I'm just doing my homework first in what's best for me . Thanks a lot.. great advice!
I like the rolling updates that I barely notice. Well, I notice the system being updated, but I don't notice any changes. That way it keeps me updated while also giving me stability.
A rolling release done right is OpenSuse Tumbleweed. Builds go through their OpenBuild and OpenQA services to ensure stability and they usually match or beat Fedora on introducing new tech.
@@ChaiBronz Same. I’ve have Tumbleweed on a laptop for 2 years now and have never had an update break something. Either updating several times a week, or letting them build up for months.
I was once interested in Krypton, which is based on openSUSE Tumbleweed. But then Suse disabled support for F2FS, so I have to avoid Suse now, until they re-enable it.
I changed from Ubuntu to Fedora last saturday and man, i really, really like fedora it's smooth af! The only pain in the ass is the need to sign the nvidia kernel if i have secure boot but i can deal with it. Really happy with the change so far. :D
Title: Fedora vs Ubuntu Content: Fedora does . Meanwhile Manjaro, Elementary do :) Ubuntu does what it has always been doing. It's still the Linux for human beings. Even more so maybe Linux Mint. Easy to install, easy to use, stuff works, easily find what you need, point and click. The video presents non-arguments, except for the fact that Red Had is indeed pushing for the future, although I don't see how Ubuntu isn't... I tried Fedora 35 this weekend and at first glance it does look gorgeous even on the live USB, *but*. First install failed. I had to search through the error logs and then the web to understand that Fedora doesn't like my existing swap partition for some reason (I already had Ubuntu and Mint partitions that could use it). Solution: Install GParted in the live session and reformat the swap partition to linux-swap (or to ext4 to disable it). Fedora will now work, but Ubuntu won't, so a few more steps are needed. Joy! After installing, I tried to get Clementine and Krusader. Well, QT apps don't have shadows and their menus don't work. Turns out it's a Wayland thing which is the default. Fedora Media Writer, installed by default, also has no shadows. So you have 2 options: 1. Use the xorg session. 2. Get the flatpak version of the apps, if available. Those work under Wayland for some reason. Krusader is a must for me, but no flatpak. On a Skylake Optimus laptop, installing Nvidia drivers requires multiple incantations at the command line and reading manuals on the web. And patience. And they only work in the xorg session. If you do get them to work. In Linux Mint it's click, click, install, reboot, done. Codecs are missing but you won't know until some media file or random news site isn't working properly. Fedora docs have an entry on what to install from RPM Fusion. DNF is pretty slow. Although the Software Manager seems fast. Booting up Fedora presents me with that scrolling wall of text which I hadn't seen in quite a while. As a note, the nice touchpad gestures only work on Wayland. All this in the first day. I didn't try any games or cloud sync, Docker, dev stuff etc. Fedora is a nice distro, but I don't see Ubuntu loosing the title of "Ubuntu" anytime soon :)
My thought exactly. I've been thinking about switching to Fedora for a while now. It seems they are the cutting edge/stability friendly to newcomers. The installation process feels fresh and easy and the onboarding is perfect. Ubuntu is always stuck in the past, thanks to their lts not being sync with Gnome Releases. It's always the same. You get a new Ubuntu release with packages that are 6months old already and you are stuck with them for 2 years.
After doing a long weeks researching about Fedora for my daily driver as a software developer, this video finally convince me. And its has been far away from disappointing. I have zero problem installing it, and aside from wifi problem, everything are just great. I can see myself using Fedora for a long time now.
If anyone games on Linux and want a gaming-based Fedora version, the Nobara-project can strongly be reccomended. It is made by Glorious Eggroll and is (since its a Fedora Workstation) SUPER stable!
I tried it, but unfortunately it refused to install my proprietary nvidia driver for some reason. That made me sad D: I run a youtube gaming channel, and I'd LOVE to become a Linux gaming channel one day. I hope Fedora itself becomes a great, natural choice for gaming along the road.
Anaconda and dnf was the weak parts of my last Fedora experience, I heard they're working on a new installer and importance of dnf decreases year by year. Exciting stuff!
@@rishirajsaikia1323 I mean you (fortunately) don't have to use dnf that much anymore. Especially when there are flatpak and toolbx/distrobox etc. I find it really sluggish whatever I do to workaround.
@@Beryesa. There are some tweaks that need to be made in the dnf.conf, such as setting it to use the fastest mirrors and increasing the parallel downloads... For some reason the Fedora team won't make those changes a default.
Fastest mirror might be fastest ping-wise, but download speed itself might be awful, hence developers do not make it default option. So basically YMMV.
Sometimes I feel allot of Linux users don't realise or understand that Ubuntu is an Enterprise distribution with a vast user base and they need to cater for the masses not the niche. Ubuntu doesn't have the luxury of what Fedora is to Redhat where Redhat can pick and choose what they want to put in the next version or RHEL. No the Linux community demand that Ubuntu has to be Bleeding edge and Enterprise at the same time and if they falter, they get their ass handed to them by the community! I’ve said this many times but the Linux community needs to step out side the box and understand that the wider world doesn't really care about the OS. It needs to be stable, simple to use and do the job. Ubuntu fits this well and that’s why we see it everywhere in the wild. Stablity is key to the enterprise world and Ubuntu gives you that with the bonus of a modern look and feel.
"It needs to be stable, simple to use and do the job" The issue is that the impression is that these things are not so much the case anymore. It looks a lot like other distro's are getting so much better whith all these things... "gives you that with the bonus of a modern look and feel" Well, they all do that...
This is an old comment but I really believe Ubuntu has its own place in the Linux community. Most schools and colleges just keep using Ubuntu and expect their students to be familiar with Ubuntu tools.
I was on arch with KDE it was cool then I switched to Fedora Gnome feeling like going from the chad distro to nooby distro But after a week I realized that it s just a great distro. Everything works fine, I don't have to take care of anything. Now it s my favorite distro I ve installed sway on it s great The only problem is the installer They should take ideas from opensuse installer and Yast. And also I m not a big fan of flatpak they should have borrowed more idea from NixOS when creating silverblue but well it cam still evolved and right now it s one of the greatest distro And nice business model too so it will last
I been using Fedora for past few weeks.. last 6 months had been distro hopping rolling releases Manjaro, Endeavor, Arch , OpenSUSE tumbleweed and all of them except Tumbleweed broke at some point... Tumbleweed never gave me issues except some missing packages that I was just too lazy to maintain myself thus I moved to Fedora.. love it so far super stable up to date with the lastest Stable software and is great for gaming and productivity.. moving all six of the PCs in my house to Fedora and do not regret it.. it is like you said the new "Ubuntu". Rolling releases have taught me you do not need the bleeding edge to be moving forward and to be frank they are more trouble then they are worth it.. let the people that use them worry about things breaking and maintaining it while we just use our PCs with Fedora haha
Solid comparison between a Ubuntu and Fedora. I discussed Fedora in my July 2019 video where I examined the larger picture and show the switch from Microsoft Windows. Great to see Fedora’s potential realized in today’s discussion.
One good thing about Fedora is it's easy to game with hybrid graphic laptops now with no need for a switcher. Just install Nvidia driver and right click the game and launch using discreet graphics.
@Shen Bapiro I've experienced this myself. I know there are distros working hard to fix the battery issues but I'm curious now if something like system 76 does well since it's pre-installed. Doubtful though.
Having Flatpak as an option for certain applications is good to have, but I prefer "native" packages maintained by my distribution maintainer. The future is not Flatpak, the future is a mix of different technologies including Flatpak. I recently needed an application, but could not use it in Linux because they only offered a Snap and I do not have Snap enabled on my system and do not plan to. Ah I remember what it was, it was the App from Github to verify my system or something similar. Currently I can't do that, because I do not use official Google store either on my smartphone with an old LineageOS.
When I was looking for a distro to replace Windows with in 2020, I first tried Kubuntu and PopOS, but I encountered some bugs I couldn't live with. Then I tried Fedora 33. It's almost everything I was looking for in an OS (I still cannot fathom why customizing the looks requires so much tinkering). Now I am using Fedora 39 and I am happy with it. Been using it for gaming and digital art. Really stable.
I went with Fedora Silverblue to try the while immutable Filesystem and sandboxing thing. And it's been pretty awesome so far. I really like about Fedora that we get the new technologies without being bleeding edge with all the packages and libraries.
I was thinking of going with it. I already install every possible app from flatpak (even replace built in apps with the flatpak version), but what about apps that don't have a flatpak? System apps, some less popular apps like XDM which only have an installation (SH) script. Can silverblue even handle those?
@@ent2220 you have a bunch of tools to address those. For those apps from the repos you need closely integrated into the system, you can use rpm-ostree to layer them on the base image. For the others, there is always toolbox-containers to run them in, since you have proper dnf and stuff in that to set up all the dependencies
I'm considering trying this as immutable appears to be gaining popularity. Anything that would cause you to switch to mainstream fedora or is everything simple to work with?
@@kevinbreen4510 for me? No. I love it. Everything is neatly compartmentalized or layered, i don't have to worry about the system itself. It just took a bit to get used to, so, the more you are a Poweruser who installs arch from the bare ones base for breakfast, the harder it's probably gonna be.
@@Wrzlprnft the main reason I like flatpak is because it reminds me more of windows. They get installed in var/lib/flatpak and user files go to the .var folder in your home directory. This way every app goes in its own folder. I really don't like the way Linux typically installs things otherwise. Where it puts files in who knows how many folders all over the root directory. Flatpak really is the future
I dont mind the gnome workflow. although not having to hide windows in dock feels weird, it's like reaching for another candybar still holding the first one in your hand, you either eat the hole candybar or throw it away otherwise you have to hold it open in your hand, you cannot hide it into your pocket... but it is an interesting experience nonetheless. I mind the way gnome is uncustomizable. I mind the gnome onscreen keyboard which lacks arrows and ctrls/alts/shifts. I mind that gnome terminal cannot have a beautiful blurred transparent background and rounded bottom corners of windows :) And I mind the weird way the gnome compositor works which looks as if everything is heavy. every font, button and panel feels heavy, am I the only one having that experience?.
Customization is always a double edged sword. Gnome limits the customization by default because it's trying to be consistent everywhere, the UI, the GTK apps etc. This is the main selling point of what Gnome is and one of the reason I much prefer Gnome over Windows that has tons of legacy GUI that still exists even in W11. The Gnome approach is basically the MacOS approach, they give app developer the tools to easily build apps and which will keep the Gnome design to give the best consistent experience to the user. On the other hand, you've got KDE which gives you the ultimate power to customize everything for people that want this capability and don't mind if a margin is a bit bigger here and there and if the overall experience is not the best but could be considered the best "for you". This is the great thing about Linux, there's choice for everyone, but let's not try to make every desktop environment focus on everything and become master of none and with no philosophy behind it.
Been trying the Ubuntu 22.04 development version for a couple of days and have been very pleased with the aesthetics, performance and stability. The user interface and desktop interface are top notch, really beautiful and customizable. Well done for the Ubuntu team. Great LTS release! Congratulations
Just started trying dev builds of Fedora 36 with GNOME 42. Other than the occasional bug that is expected from pre-release software, it’s been absolutely amazing! Fedora 36 polishes up a few things and of course includes all the new features of GNOME 42, which is chocked full of awesome stuff! (I particularly love the new text editor, dynamic light/dark wallpapers, and redesigned overlays for volume / brightness / switching workspaces, but there are so many more new features in it that all feel fresh yet polished.)
You know what? I've been having a lot of trouble with Manjaro recently, especially with updates almost every time I turn my PC on. KDE has also been pretty buggy, it seems, and basic functionally like remembering my desktop layout has just completely broken. The last time I tried Fedora, I accidentally briked it while trying to install Nvidia dirvers, but you've convinced me to give Fedora another go! Cheers
I flip flop from Fedora and Pop!_OS. I wish Pop would rebase on top of Fedora. Probably won't happen, especially with Pop focusing on their own desktop environment, but one can dream.
I distro hop all over, trying different Linux distributions, but I kept coming back to Fedora. It felt the most comfortable to me. I love it! Great review bro.
As i mentioned a few days ago in one of your previous videos (about ubuntu) Fedora is the most stable and functional distro while i really don't like the anaconda installer. Also Fedora used to focus on Gnome which is great. I like Gnome, but i prefer much more the KDE Plasma Desktop and i would like to see more attention from the Fedora Dev Team on it. I would like also to mention (as addition) about the BTRFS Filesystem. Btrfs is used by default in Fedora since version 33, even though OpenSUSE use it earlier(maybe other distros too), Fedora's adoption made more people to play with it. Somehow the same thing as you told about Wayland. You know i'm very happy to see such video about Fedora on this channel and i really thank you because i believe this video will attrack more people to Fedora.
Does Plasma put as much emphasis on accessibility? The only desktops that will win in the long run are ones that have comprehensive accessibility settings, because without that many people will continue to use desktops that do or continue to use Windows and MacOS for these features instead.
Seriously. After lots of distro hopping, making my own system on arch for a few years....when I checked out Fedora 32 I felt like I found some sort of open secret in the community. Gets out of my way, plenty of support for rpms, current software without being unstable? Fedora's awesome.
How do you feel Fedora compares with openSUSE? I've been using Linux for a little over 2 years and tried just about everything, but these two RPM distros have felt by far the most polished, stable, and mature (maybe because of their roots as professional/workstation distributions?)
I have been using fedora for a while now on my laptop and stock gnome really is amazing on laptops. The mousepad gestures are something I’d never like to miss
I remember back in 05 when I first tried linux and Fedora and Suse were considered the beginner friendly distros, with Ubuntu being the literally brand new kid on the block, at it's second iteration I think. Nice to see the more things change the more they stay the same ;-P EDIT. I was with you until you said Ubuntu or ZorinOS don't get the latest Gnome. That's a plus for them and a minus for Fedora. True, Gnome is a minus for all, but it's a smaller minus in the cases of Ubuntu and ZorinOS.
@@walking_on_earth There are 4 types of linux users: 1. People who live in the TTY - we call these people sys admins. 2. People who post images on r/linuxporn - we call these people WM users. 3. People who think that KDE isn't polished enough and who might use something other than KDE because they don't want to spend their day setting KDE up just like they want - we call these people Desktop Linux users. 4. People who think Gnome has too many features and could do with a few being removed - preferably while increasing the memory footprint of Gnome as a whole - we call these people Gnome developers. Now, to answer your question with another question: why are you a Gnome apologist?
I tried fedora for a while back around 18-20, It was a good experience. I switched to CentOS 7 for some very specific reasons (I was training for a Linux admin cert and CentOS is much closer to RedHat enterprise.). Later going to Debian stable for the larger package selection and well supported Xfce. I haven't switched in several years because I don't currently have a second workstation and can't afford an interruption to my workflow. (also why I use Deb stable) Manjaro was on my old laptop. I liked it, very nice driver and kernel handling utilities, but it had the rare broken updates, mostly due to the old age of my install and the need to shift away from certain legacy dependencies; not unfixable for a knowledgeable admin but certainly would cause problems for a new user.
I've been using Linux Mint for years, but I decided to give Fedora a try a few months ago. The experience has been a mixed bag. It is "stable" in the sense it will not hang your PC, but it's riddled with minor annoyances you can't solve. Some applications will not run on Wayland, and while there's a compatibility layer named "XWayland" that should allow me to run Xorg apps, it's either not included with Fedora, or not working for every app. The inclusion of Flatpak support is more than welcomed. You're probably right about "the default experience", since it's enough for most users. But I'm having difficulties to see the benefits, while the defects are right in front of my face . Bottom line, the title is correct, it's definitely "the new Ubuntu" in the sense of being too edgy, with all the pros and cons.
Been using Fedora for 4 years now. Love it. It’s basically upstream for RHEL and I use RHEL a lot at work so it’s nice to play with the cool new stuff before it’s put in the new builds for RHEL.
THANK YOU for mentioning that Manjaro has ISSUES-- so many pitched a FIT when I said that once... and ebuzz Central-- they had a HUGE fit over that.. but he was RIGHT- it does!!!! I like Manjaro and MABOX- (have the newest and it ooks smoother).. but I'm kinda stuck on MX 21 now--- have a hard time letting it go- and always come right back to it-- because I can use MY CUSTOM ISO and have it running in 5 minutes..
I'd love to use it. Last time I tried a Fedora 35 install, I discovered that there's no support for zfs in that version, which is a show-stopper for me.
just add the fedora repos from zfs yourself. Fedora does not support it because upstream (linus towarlds/the kernel) does not want to support it for licensing reasons. I must say, I have not tried it because of that, but it should be possible
Fedora is more stable and more powerful than Ubuntu ever was or could even dream of. New features, no idea. I’m running Fedora 34 with an updated kernel. Everything works and I see no reason to update.
I used Fedora for almost a decade, but shifted to Debian back in 2017. I am now running Manjaro, but I am really glad to hear that Fedora is still awesome.
Is it true Manjaro tends to break a lot ? I've heard people saying that even Arch is more stable, but I've been using it without issue for two years now. 🤔
I don't like the standard Gnome experience, but it needs few modifications to be usable. I do like this: 1 - I install the "just perfction" extension, and "hot edge". 2 - Using Just perfection I move the panel down, the clock to the right and configure the panel to appear only in the overview, and hide some other things I don't like. And that's it, a clean environment that you can use with the mouse without depending on the super key.
Interesting video. I was using Fedora a couple of yers ago, now switched to Mac + Kali (Security-related job). So maybe it's time to check Fedora out in a VM. Thanks for the video!
Fedora and Ubuntu, my two most favourite distros...I love ubuntu due to its simplicity and hardware support since several years ago. But Fedora has a special place in me. I know deeper about text mode for the first time when I bought a book contains Fedora tutorials. Not only text mode but also LVM, source codes, etc. It's very important for me to do many things in Linux properly, as all Linux enthusiasts think. I even still save some written notes in text mode to install ATI driver, just for memories not to be typed because hardware support nowadays is far more sophisticated than when ATI graphics were in their gold era back then...
I don’t think you’ll remember this but a few months back you dropped a fedora video and just a day before that I distributed hopped to pop os or something. But watching your video craved me to install fedora and it’s been in my laptop ever since! Before that I used to distort hop literally every week but not anymore! Thanks to fedora I’ve stopped hopping distros because as you said,”it’s THAT good!”. As always great video Nick. ❤️
I can only agree with you! Personally, I use Arch linux, but recently a friend (pretty much a computer noob) needed help installing _any_ OS for light office work on their new laptop. Arch wasn't an option as it gets updates too often and tends to break without administration, while Ubuntu gets updates too infrequently and I don't want to be bothered having to upgrade to the newest Ubtuntu release every few months. Also, I just can't stand Canonical since they felt like the proprietary Snap store was a good idea. Fedora really was the ideal choice - up to date, modern and a vanilla (Gnome) experience, the way my Arch desktop is set up. I just installed a few extensions to help them transition from Windows to Gnome, but that was really it. My friend had this laptop in use for some weeks now and never once complained or came with a question to me - it just works, updates and all included :D
Agreed. Fedora is a really well made Linux distribution that is quite impressive. Some do not like the installer but at least the Fedora installs quick and you should only have to do it once.
I love hearing about your experience with dnf because I'm a Linux Admin, but our servers run CenOS and Fedora, so to me, dnf is just simple. Meanwhile I run Linux Mint on my iMac for work and PopOS on my Laptop and apt is still something I'm working to learn better. I just started dabbling in Manjaro and really like it, so going to start now learning pacman now as well 😂
They just need an installer that humans can use and its going to be perfect
Hahaha yeah
the installer is actually getting a rework, according to them. Don’t know when it will be pushed out, though.
LOL it’s not that bad but maybe if you needed to do a bunch of partition management it would be cumbersome? The interface seems a little wonky compared to Calamares but I had no problem getting through it personally
I went with Fedora because of the installer. I needed a RAID setup and when it comes to unorthodox setups Red Hat has made it way easier, and it shows by a mile.
Test yourself, try to set up RAID or some other atypical setup on Arch, Manjaro, what have you, and on Fedora its the easiest.
Have to say though, the bleeding edge repo's on Arch though is light years ahead of Fedora, and I sincerely miss them.
Ouch. Burn....
But yeah. Installer is solid, but the UX is horrendous for Mr everyone.
I feel like having vanilla GNOME is one of Fedora's strongest advantages over other distributions. I absolutely use extensions, but I'd rather be the one choosing them and having a clean install out of the box. My extensions are just, like, hiding the top bar unless I'm in the overview, adding a middle click to close windows in the overview, a couple minor menu tweaks, things like that. I don't want my distribution to hack a Start menu or persistent dock paradigm onto a DE that's fundamentally not designed for it and is, frankly, much better than other DE's strictly because of its overview paradigm.
Exactly! I think going vanilla GNOME makes things much more consistent and reproducible across installations and devices.
I feel the same way, it's easier to start from vanilla and add what you want rather than start from a mess and get it to where you want :p
@@ps5hasnogames55 I don't give a damn about desktop icons. They are not good and you're better using your file manager.
@@ps5hasnogames55 it is actually bad
You will always struggle to convince me that Gnome in its vanilla form is a user-friendly or newbie friendly desktop environment. I'm just an old-fashioned (and old lol) mouse point and click sort of person. I don't 'want' to change, I don't 'want' to learn a new and different desktop paradigm. To me, personally, Gnome is a bit like Arch, it's better for people who are technologically competent and who enjoy fiddling with their systems to get them exactly where they want to be. And, I understand that Gnome probably is really good for people who use their computers for 'work'. For the basic, simple, day to day computer user who likes using a mouse and a GUI, I could never recommend either Gnome or any 'pure' version of Arch... just too high maintenance... IMO :) Oh, the Gnome exceptions are Zorin Core and perhaps Manjaro Gnome... for 'me' :) And the only version of Arch I will ever use is Manjaro. I follow a few simple rules on Manjaro and so far it's always been good for me (I'm talking stable for years now as a basic user) - I avoid the AUR if at all possible, I stick to an LTS kernel wherever possible, and I always do major updates in TTY rather than on the desktop itself. Maybe one day I'll come unstuck on Manjaro... I also accept that nothing is perfect :) DEs and distros are very much an individual user thing and probably always will be. Manjaro and Fedora ARE my two favourite distros, Cinnamon is my favourite DE, it does everything that 'I' need it to do :) Oh, I don't mind Mint and MX either... and Zorin :)
This all started on Fedora 32, since then it went from meh, to surprisingly good, to the best distro for EVERYONE. Coders, scripters, everyday users, whatever you want to do, Fedora is for you. Hats off to Fedora and their developers, every release they set the bar higher for everyone
I see what you did there.
@@turanamo Bios plan got rejected. Comment aged like milk
@@turanamo How old are you talking. As my HP Elitebook from 2013 has UEFI. Even some machines before then also have UEFI.
@@jimmywoods7404well efi is from the 90s.
The problem is there were many compatability issues with uefi for many years.
I couldn't agree more. Linus from LTT kept knocking Fedora as a meme but he really missed out on a stable user friendly distro. Personally I use arch but my wife and mother are both using fedora and I'm debating about switching back as I'm getting a bit tired of random things breaking and like you said... most things have an RPM or flatpak version nowadays.
Believe me been on arch for a long time, it's not worth it. There is more to love on Fedora. Yes, it's on arch first, but you don't need to manually switch to latest new thing as it will come by default with a new release. Think of pipewire. It's manual work on arch and meanwhile on Fedora pulseaudio will automatically be swapped after an update. And you can be quite certain that the switch won't be rushed or unstable.
@Modzilla I agree. The manual work in arch is getting old. It was more about if I could and less of if I should. 😆
I kind of facepalmed when he poked fun at Fedora.
I switched to linux ater the LTT videos and everything i learned since then tells me linus was an absolute idiot. He made the worst possible decisions at every step, almost like he wanted to point out bugs and scare his nooby audience/create drama rather than try to make it work.
@@kanishcktewatia597
I've been gaming on Linux for quite some time now, and to be completely fair, they did make some good points in that series. The truth is, is that Linux isn't Windows, and it's easy to forget that in terms of games, we are often jumping through a compatibility and translation layer to get those games to work. There are challenges associated with that. The trouble comes in when people expect Linux to behave just like Windows, and close their mind to learning a new way of thinking about things. Those people tend to have a very very hard time. And Linus seemed to be a little stuck in that rut during his segments. There are elements of the Linux experience that need work, and elements that should be made more accessible, but Linux doesn't need to be like Windows to be great. I think a lot of folks get stuck on that.
Been using fedora since fedora 32, and it has been an amazing experience.
The biggest hassle I faced was the extension support when gnome went from version 3.38 to 40, I had to wait months, or find a replacement for most of the extensions I used.
Other than that, It has been great. Having nothing but a small bar on top is so much better for my productivity.
@@ps5hasnogames55 Imagine being a manchild like you
I've been on Fedora since the early 20's release. The only update that was unbearable was F26 because of the kernel 4.4 and the Nvidia GPU issues.Immediately after that, It has been flawless.
I've been using Fedora since version 7. It was pleasant ride all the way. :)
Those Ubuntu 10.10 clips gave me nostalgia and reminded me of why I used to love it so much. I loved Unity too.
Good for Canonical for being able to turn a profit, but maybe it would be better if they exited the desktop space. Or make Ubuntu Desktop a full community project.
They need to keep some influence on the Desktop although if it is minimal, Ubuntu Desktop can be a profitable in the future
@@AdiPrimandaGinting a perfect world would be if they went the Red Hat route.
A community distro that acts as upstream for a commercial distro.
@@dstinnettmusic I don't think Fedora is completely community run. Redhat has a lot of stake to drive Fedora in a way that would turn profit for them
@@AdiPrimandaGinting Correct, it is not completely community run, but it is largely community managed,
Fedora is run by the Fedora Council (great name btw), which is made up of members of both the community and Red Hat Employees.
The Council Chair is selected by Red Hat and approved by the Fedora Council.
The idea is to let Fedora function independently but make sure it stays on a path where it can act as upstream for RHEL.
Contrast with Ubuntu, which is made in house by canonical.
@@dstinnettmusic Not correct on Ubuntu part. Ubuntu is like the fruit of labor between community and Canonical although I think Canonical has always have more power being the financier of the project. Ubuntu community has its own community structure with community council and technical board being on top. Although from your comment, I think Fedora community has more power than Ubuntu community in deciding the life of their respective distro.
After building my first desktop PC in 20+ years, and trying Ubuntu first... I ultimately went with Fedora 35 + Windows 10. Fedora's been working great, and the most annoying thing so far (which is completely surface-level) is that OpenRGB requires a bit more work to get it running on Fedora.
And sometimes other packages assume you use a Debian derived OS, and you have to compile or manually install something on Fedora.
Great to see that you landed on Fedora! I'm a RX600XT user on F35 myself and it's great. You should read up on dnf as the package manger, it has some awesome features like downloading rpms (or cloning full on repos), rolling back transactions based on a bash like history, not breaking over a wonky ssh connection (not great on apt ....), updating the repos without running update and installing rpms directly from URLs with depency check and everything.
Packaging would be my main concern for switching to Fedora as well. I think of it as probably a cooler distro than Ubuntu, but less effortlessly practical due to not being the default/most mainstream choice. I also don't want to learn a new package manager and package repo/package ecosystem... Hmm.
@@MrSmitheroons it's actually not hard at all. Instead of debs you have rpms that you can install with dnf install ./my.rpm . To do all other stuff it's quite similar to apt, you just don't need to update the repos all the time, dnf does it automatically. So to update use dnf update. And if you want to install software from the repos use dnf install xyz. That's it. All of that can also be done in gnome software, so don't be afraid.
fedora new king of bloatware?
@@MrSmitheroons with flatpak is not really a problem anymore, for GUI apps ofc
I agree 100%. I've been on Fedora KDE for several months and I feel like it's my new long-term distro; no more temptation to distro-hop! It's great for users, and it's great for developing on top of. And the KDE version is not a second-class citizen! The worst feature is the installer, but hopefully you'll only have to see it once...
I remember installing RH 7.3 being better than fedora nowadays, it's a pity
I thought you guys use daily built KDE Neon?
@@4n0nmann5 Some of us do. But Neon Unstable is actually better for QA than development. For development, you generally build everything from source yourself (because you're hacking on it), so you don't need a distro in which everything is built from source every day for you. For developers it's more inortant that supporting software libraries are kept up to date, and for this a rolling release distro or semi-rolling distro like Fedora is better. But Neon Unstable is quite useful for dedicated QA people, bug triagers, etc.
@@ps5hasnogames55 Yes, Fedora KDE does need to 'modernize' some of their 'older' apps into newer and more viable ones... but, you can still elect to use X11 rather than Wayland at the login screen. Still, not sure if that is really Fedora's fault with the apps or KDE's fault :)
I love Fedora. I have had absolutely 0 issues. I can not say the same for arch
Been on Fedora since 27, upgraded all the way until 35 and looking forward to 36. Welcome to Fedora fam!
Thanks :) I'm eagerly awaiting for Fedora 36!
@@TheLinuxEXP if you want to push updates to an after though, enable auto updates on the app store. Also works for Flatpaks!
You speak exactly from my soul. I've been using Fedora for a few years and the system runs and runs. I don't have to fix anything all the time.
I would only change three things about Fedora:
Flathub directly integrated
Offer RPM Fusion completely as a third-party source.
Installer also for beginners (but they're already working on that).
I 100% agree with everything you said here. Fedora is awesome because its not bleeding edge but is current. Provides stock desktop and apps instead of bloated messes. And uses the godly Flatpaks by default along with Wayland, Pipewire, etc. It's like legitimately my ideal distro.
Fedora's only weakness is its installer. If it adopted the Elementary/PopOS installer it would be god-tier.
Flatpaks are shit, just install software with your package manager from the terminal using simple and easy to learn commands.
I like this channel a lot. The exact stuff I want to know in order to move to another distro as my daily driver is covered here. I wish I had more time to experiment with more distros but as a freelance web dev time gets scarse 😞, however I agree and share these feelings of Ubuntu and after using it for years I'll move to fedora and feel excited about the experience of working on it full time and see how it goes. Thanks for that!.
In my experience Fedora is one of the best distribution. I like the default features, the look and feel, and the stability. Especially when developing applications, the performance is perfect. But, the only issue that I faced is some libraries being incompatible when working with machine learning. Ubuntu has a bigger community when talking about ML, which comes in handy when I get stuck on something related to libraries and packages dependencies.
Using guix or nix on fedora as a overlay. Is the ultimate dev setup
I've been saying this for a while. Fedora is my new goto recommendation for new users. It "just works*" more than Ubuntu far more often for me. Flatpaks by default is also good for letting new users avoid the terminal.
Linus level sponsor segues, love it
Everyone: You should put everything on your desktop in a folder
Me: but the desktop is a folder
Everyone: ... You aren't wrong, but I hate you
but in some distributions the system adds icons dynamically to the desktop (usb...), if all your stuff is in a single subfolder, the system icons will be much easier to find/see ... imo
Don't forget that Fedora Server with Cockpit is also an amazing experience! Makes me wonder why people got all mad about the CentOS switch (I mean I know why they got mad, but still)
Two years ago, i hopped from Ubuntu to Fedora after finally having had enough of outdated Ubuntu repos, and I never looked back. And like you said, despite the cutting-edge mentality, Fedora has been rock-solid for me since day 1.
Both Fedora 36 and Ubuntu 22.04, which both will be released in April, include GNOME 42, which itself was released on March 23. I'm glad to see Ubuntu devs are starting to prioritize the implementation of the latest GNOME versions. It's probably thanks to distros like Fedora that give Ubuntu a little wakeup call and make them compete harder.
I wanted to dip my toes in the 'immutable filesystem' OS waters. After surveying the landscape, chose Fedora Silverblue to try mainly because it defaults to GNOME (bonus that Fedora tracks the GNOME release cadence; note, Fedora Kinoite is the KDE spin of Silverblue).
So, I installed Fedora Silverblue in a VM and was pleased to find that its defaults are things that I'd normally need to configure myself like btrfs w/compression, zram, /tmp on in-RAM tmpfs, a release-tracking Linux kernel, etc. Finding toolbox was also a pleasant surprise, as it makes using containers for running apps & doing software development super easy. Flatpak wasn't much of a consideration but it'll be nice to have fresh apps with no dependency problems.
I was tired of maintaining franken-buntu & franken-debian installations, so after a trial run on some older hardware and finding Firefox pre-configured for Wayland (Intel graphics) and buttery smooth, I made the jump to Fedora Silverblue as my main desktop OS. Adding RPM Fusion's libva-intel-driver & ffmpg-libs was an easy fix for hardware video decode for Firefox.
So yeah, I think Fedora is quickly becoming the new Ubuntu.
I've been preaching this like a madman for a while now ! All these ubuntu based distros should really consider rebasing themselves on Fedora, if that's even possible. I think a Fedora based PopOS, Mint or Elementary would be great and would reduce the workload of distro mantainers trying compensate for the Ubuntu LTS delay when implementing new teck and updating packages. It would also would help pull more people into working on the teck that's trully driving Linux desktop towards the future.
well, Mint is not going to use Fedora, as their backup option is pure Debian (check LMDE)
still, Pop!_OS on Fedora would be great considering the fact it's a quite good gaming distro
@@erned8445 If Mint used Fedora as their base they wouldn't 'need' to have LMDE as a back up. I prefer LMDE to Mint Cinnamon these days anyway, lighter, faster and more stable.
Basically Ubuntu needs to drop all of its Snaps and one-off customizations and become an APT-based version of Fedora-a constant, vanilla, cutting-edge release without an LTS every 2 years to slow it down. Then produce a completely separate, biannual distro called Ubuntu LTS that incorporates the features from the mainline distro that have proven to be stable.
Ubuntu needs to do this, because right now the “perfect distro” for beginners really doesn’t exist. Fedora is DARN close, but they still fall short with auto-signing kernel modules for secure boot. DNF is also really great-better than APT frankly-but 90% of online forums and UA-cam tutorials assume APT is being used.
@@emjaycee I don't think Fedora base would be something that's in line with Mint's vision - to be nothing but stability and ease to use. especially minding that Fedora utilises Anaconda installer, which might be confusing to the beginner, comparing to Ubiquity.
@@erned8445 Mint could use any installer they want. I know the Ubiquity and/or Calamares installer is simpler, but I actually like the new LMDE5 installer of all of them. As far as stability goes, I think Fedora is significantly more stable than what Ubuntu offers these days. The Debian base is very stable, but Debian also has its limitations. I do agree with you though that the Fedora base probably isn't in Mint's vision... doesn't mean it shouldn't be though :) If Mint used Fedora's standard package base and then added what is included in RPM Fusion (like Ultramarine does), they would have everything they need. Some of Mint's special GUI apps would 'probably' translate across pretty well. I'm sure it would be a lot of work to make the transition, but if they are looking to the future, it probably should be under consideration. And just add in the latest LTS kernel every 6 months and you'd be set :)
Btw "typing the name of the app I want" is usually just typing 2 or 3 letters of the name .The shell learns your commonly used apps and will highlight those selections.
Also you don't even need to know the name: "ph..." will bring up a selection of photo related apps such as shotwell and GIMP
Spyware at its best.
Glad to see Fedora getting the love it deserves. Fedora is amazingly stable for a semi-rolling release style distro, and it has been amazing for gaming.
Fedora is not semi rolling.
@@babyboomertwerkteam5662 On Fedora, you get regular app updates (not just bugfixes (like on Debian) but real updates to newer versions) even within a version cycle. You even get regular kernel updates within a version cycle. Compared to Debian which sticks with the same LTS versions of their apps for two years.
So when compared to Debian, Fedora can be seen as semi-rolling.
@@sebKern91 The amount of updates you get isn't what makes a distro "rolling" or not. Rolling releases pull from the same repositories forever and never branch into different versions. It doesn't matter if the distro freezes on one app version like Debian or gives you new app versions during a release like Fedora - if the distro has multiple versions, it by definition cannot be considered a rolling release.
I should also mention that you're not guaranteed to get new app versions on one version of Fedora - this is especially true with desktop environments - each version of Fedora stays on one version of its desktop per release with the only exception being KDE due to its release schedule and buggier nature, and even then typically only one upgrade is allowed per Fedora version, with very rare exceptions (for example, Fedora 35 got two Plasma upgrades, but it was only because Plasma 5.23 couldn't be thoroughly tested in time for its release so Fedora 35 had to ship with Plasma 5.22.5 on release). Fedora's stable update policy for apps specifically disallows updating apps and libraries if they change the user interface or API, with only some exceptions (web browsers for example), and all new app versions are putt through testing before they're released to Fedora's repositories. If an app doesn't pass testing, it gets delayed until it's fixed, or it doesn't get shipped. Kernel versions for example; major versions do not get shipped until there's been about 2 weeks of testing.
Also, there is a rolling version of Fedora called Rawhide, but it's experimental (to the point where even the kernel is straight off Linus Torvalds' git master branch) and isn't intended for anyone other than developers.
Fedora “just works”, which is good insofar as it keeps you focused on your work and the system is very stable. It’s a downside when you want to dig into the inner workings of the system. I love Fedora on my laptop, where the trackpad gestures and streamlined UI really take advantage of that device’s hardware. However for my desktop I’m sticking with Endeavour+KDE for now since it is more pleasant to customize to my liking, and KDE has a lot of useful features and powerful stock apps.
I'd use Fedora Gnome myself, but currently using EndeavourOS Gnome with pacman and AUR, and the EndeavourOS community its just so good I can't imagine using anything else right now.
Give Fedora KDE a spin, it's been really fine on my laptop for quite a while
@Sergio Cuervo yeah I was gonna say that
I've been using Fedora KDE, and it's really solid. A good in-between for those getting into Linux and power users that don't like the instability that Arch can have at times. It even has a UEFI boot logo screen, which is nice from a polish perspective.
Only downside is that there's no option in the installer for Fedora KDE to automatically install NVIDIA Drivers, Flatpak, and RPMFusion.
Yeah, the default no third party packages can be a pain, but I think since it’s sponsored and basically owned by red hat, there might be some legal issues when hosting the software versus giving the software in a repo for you to install afterwards.
That’s what a red hatter told me from the legal side of things.
@@ps5hasnogames55 Could just uninstall those pieces of software. Or just install regular Fedora, install KDE Plasma, and then remove the GNOME portion of it.
So far, I've had less issues with that than KDE on Arch for example, which doesn't even install packagekit-qt5 by default, leading to Discover and a lot of stuff not working.
@@ps5hasnogames55 Not necessarily. It's more like the KDE Desktop environment option used for archinstall installs Discover by default without installing the dependencies that are required to use it.
I definitely do agree that distributions should be more lightweight, and that Fedora should just give the option of installing an alternate desktop environment from the installer image rather than relying on a third-party for a good OOB experience. Manjaro from my experience is way more bloated than this spin of Fedora though, although that's not really saying much.
Ive always thought of Fedora as a Gnome distro, I might check out the KDE spin if people dont have the issues with KDE like we did in the past.
Interesting to hear that. In the past, I read about some people having issues with Fedora KDE. I read that the KDE spin isn't as well polished as the Gnome version. But if it's now stable, maybe I should give it a try.
I currently use Fedora Gnome but I'm thinking about switching back to KDE. Gnome 41 is great but still I sometimes think that KDE is better suited for me.
In the past, I used KDE neon, but with its Ubuntu LTS base, it has problems with outdated software. For example, you get a rather old version of the Flatpak platform, thus some apps like Eclipse won't work. You get old kernels, lacking features like proper NTFS support (kernel 5.15) or support for the Nintendo Switch controller (kernel 5.16). Pulseaudio showed some instabilities, while in Fedora, you get PipeWire, which just works fine (even with effect programs like EasyEffects).
So I think about installing Fedora KDE anytime soon.
Couldn't agree more. I recently fell in love with Fedora and vanilla Gnome as well. I'm really looking forward to Fedora 36 and Gnome 42!
I still have to install dash to panel, input output device picker and a few other extensions. Stock gnome is perfectly usable and i feel like casual users would love it, but when it comes to getting stuff done, a taskbar will always be the best option for me. It also gives you the ability to switch workspaces with the mouse wheel hover the taskbar, and the ability to isolate them, which stock gnome doesn't do. What's the point of workspaces if the apps running in each are not separate instances?
@@ent2220 Use KDE then I guess? People need to stop turning Gnome into something it was never meant to be IMO.
@@maxarendorff6521 I don't like KDE. KDE feels worse than windows to me. Gnome is so sleek and starts off so barebones. Thats what I want, and then add stuff as I seee fit. 90 percent of apps and prebuilt stuff on KDE distros I don't want. I also don't like many of their apps that start with K
@@maxarendorff6521 like I really really don't like KDE. The settings app, the way the whole thing is basically. The only two things I like is they let you change default file manager and dolphin s "extract here" "extract to seperate folder" context menu options. Other than that there is nothing that I like about KDE. Xfce is much much better and gnome is the best
Your sense of humor makes the content that much more enjoyable. Well done, sir.
Fedora and OpenSuse for me are the top 2 distros. I can read about new KDE enhancements and install them just days later.
Set my friend up with a Lenovo, installed Fedora, she was up and running in an hour. Couldn't have been easier, and Flatpaks are amazing.
You should switch from virtualbox to virt-manager then you could play with pci-passthrough (note: chose windows as the machine install type even installing linux for pci passthrough) And You can do this with one video card if you have another machine you can use to connect to it using x2go.
Yeah, I should probably do that
Apparently I'm too stupid to figure out virt-manager. Maybe Nick could do a video for my pea sized brain?
@@TheLinuxEXP yeah especially since VirtualBox needs uses dkms and has to build the kernel modules on every kernel update... And dkms modules tend to break, sooner or later. I tried VB for some time for vagrant but VB is just terrible software imho and just completely switched libvirt for vagrant as well. Gnome boxes and virt-manager ftw. To see your boxes VMs you only need to add the libvirt user session in virt-manager. And virt-manager really isn't hard to use!
@@kevinbreen4510 Chris Titus had a few good videos on it but I wouldn't mind another video or two.
If I get brave enough maybe I'll give a video a shot.
after trying fedora, distro hopping became more about reminding me of how Fedora doesn't need replacing than anything else
In my experience of using Fedora, the installation was more awkward than others, but the main issue for me is that performance was noticeably slower compared with Debian/Ubuntu based distros, such as Kubuntu, Mint, MX Linux, Neon, Feren etc.
Great video.. glad I subscribed.. I'm looking forward to trying out this Linux version.. I'm just doing my homework first in what's best for me . Thanks a lot.. great advice!
Been using fedora since 12-14, now this REHL scares me
I could definitely use fedora as my main distro, but I just prefer arch linux because of the aur.
I like the rolling updates that I barely notice. Well, I notice the system being updated, but I don't notice any changes. That way it keeps me updated while also giving me stability.
A rolling release done right is OpenSuse Tumbleweed. Builds go through their OpenBuild and OpenQA services to ensure stability and they usually match or beat Fedora on introducing new tech.
+ BTRFS w/ Snapper setup out of the box
I'm on tumbleweed now and was on Fedora 32/33 before.. I like them both and would be happy with either.
@@ChaiBronz Same. I’ve have Tumbleweed on a laptop for 2 years now and have never had an update break something. Either updating several times a week, or letting them build up for months.
I was once interested in Krypton, which is based on openSUSE Tumbleweed. But then Suse disabled support for F2FS, so I have to avoid Suse now, until they re-enable it.
Daily driving Fedora Silverblue for a month. It's what I was looking for from the day I started to use Linux.
I changed from Ubuntu to Fedora last saturday and man, i really, really like fedora it's smooth af! The only pain in the ass is the need to sign the nvidia kernel if i have secure boot but i can deal with it. Really happy with the change so far. :D
That is why I went with an AMD Video card. No headaches at all.
Title: Fedora vs Ubuntu
Content: Fedora does . Meanwhile Manjaro, Elementary do :)
Ubuntu does what it has always been doing. It's still the Linux for human beings. Even more so maybe Linux Mint. Easy to install, easy to use, stuff works, easily find what you need, point and click.
The video presents non-arguments, except for the fact that Red Had is indeed pushing for the future, although I don't see how Ubuntu isn't...
I tried Fedora 35 this weekend and at first glance it does look gorgeous even on the live USB, *but*.
First install failed. I had to search through the error logs and then the web to understand that Fedora doesn't like my existing swap partition for some reason (I already had Ubuntu and Mint partitions that could use it).
Solution: Install GParted in the live session and reformat the swap partition to linux-swap (or to ext4 to disable it). Fedora will now work, but Ubuntu won't, so a few more steps are needed. Joy!
After installing, I tried to get Clementine and Krusader. Well, QT apps don't have shadows and their menus don't work. Turns out it's a Wayland thing which is the default.
Fedora Media Writer, installed by default, also has no shadows.
So you have 2 options:
1. Use the xorg session.
2. Get the flatpak version of the apps, if available. Those work under Wayland for some reason. Krusader is a must for me, but no flatpak.
On a Skylake Optimus laptop, installing Nvidia drivers requires multiple incantations at the command line and reading manuals on the web. And patience.
And they only work in the xorg session. If you do get them to work.
In Linux Mint it's click, click, install, reboot, done.
Codecs are missing but you won't know until some media file or random news site isn't working properly. Fedora docs have an entry on what to install from RPM Fusion.
DNF is pretty slow. Although the Software Manager seems fast.
Booting up Fedora presents me with that scrolling wall of text which I hadn't seen in quite a while.
As a note, the nice touchpad gestures only work on Wayland.
All this in the first day. I didn't try any games or cloud sync, Docker, dev stuff etc.
Fedora is a nice distro, but I don't see Ubuntu loosing the title of "Ubuntu" anytime soon :)
My thought exactly. I've been thinking about switching to Fedora for a while now. It seems they are the cutting edge/stability friendly to newcomers. The installation process feels fresh and easy and the onboarding is perfect.
Ubuntu is always stuck in the past, thanks to their lts not being sync with Gnome Releases. It's always the same. You get a new Ubuntu release with packages that are 6months old already and you are stuck with them for 2 years.
After doing a long weeks researching about Fedora for my daily driver as a software developer, this video finally convince me. And its has been far away from disappointing. I have zero problem installing it, and aside from wifi problem, everything are just great. I can see myself using Fedora for a long time now.
And Redhat is the new Canonical 😂
I moved away from fedora after facing crazy compiler toolchain issues years ago. I would prefer the option of stability vs edge
My absolute favourite Distro for over a decade. I cannot begin to describe all the things I love about Fedora.
If anyone games on Linux and want a gaming-based Fedora version, the Nobara-project can strongly be reccomended. It is made by Glorious Eggroll and is (since its a Fedora Workstation) SUPER stable!
I tried it, but unfortunately it refused to install my proprietary nvidia driver for some reason. That made me sad D:
I run a youtube gaming channel, and I'd LOVE to become a Linux gaming channel one day.
I hope Fedora itself becomes a great, natural choice for gaming along the road.
@@agnuswulf I'm using AMD, so I don't know anything about Nvidia drivers
Anaconda and dnf was the weak parts of my last Fedora experience, I heard they're working on a new installer and importance of dnf decreases year by year. Exciting stuff!
dnf will replace yum
@@rishirajsaikia1323 I mean you (fortunately) don't have to use dnf that much anymore. Especially when there are flatpak and toolbx/distrobox etc. I find it really sluggish whatever I do to workaround.
@@Beryesa. There are some tweaks that need to be made in the dnf.conf, such as setting it to use the fastest mirrors and increasing the parallel downloads... For some reason the Fedora team won't make those changes a default.
@@ximplex1 No worries, did my wiki tour properly as an Arch tradition and ik that, but thanks :D
Fastest mirror might be fastest ping-wise, but download speed itself might be awful, hence developers do not make it default option. So basically YMMV.
Excellent video. I'll try Fedora again. Right now I'm using Debian Gnome.
Sometimes I feel allot of Linux users don't realise or understand that Ubuntu is an Enterprise distribution with a vast user base and they need to cater for the masses not the niche.
Ubuntu doesn't have the luxury of what Fedora is to Redhat where Redhat can pick and choose what they want to put in the next version or RHEL. No the Linux community demand that Ubuntu has to be Bleeding edge and Enterprise at the same time and if they falter, they get their ass handed to them by the community!
I’ve said this many times but the Linux community needs to step out side the box and understand that the wider world doesn't really care about the OS. It needs to be stable, simple to use and do the job. Ubuntu fits this well and that’s why we see it everywhere in the wild. Stablity is key to the enterprise world and Ubuntu gives you that with the bonus of a modern look and feel.
exactly
"It needs to be stable, simple to use and do the job" The issue is that the impression is that these things are not so much the case anymore. It looks a lot like other distro's are getting so much better whith all these things...
"gives you that with the bonus of a modern look and feel" Well, they all do that...
We're talking specifically about what's best AS A DESKTOP. If canonical doesn't prioritize that, they shouldn't present ubuntu as a desktop os.
This is an old comment but I really believe Ubuntu has its own place in the Linux community. Most schools and colleges just keep using Ubuntu and expect their students to be familiar with Ubuntu tools.
Blue is the new orange!
I've installed fedora to give it a try because of this video. So far, so good. Thanks!
With Windows 11 you also get this feeling of don‘t having to care about your system. Great video, Fedora is just a great mix of Manjaro and Ubuntu😂
I'm using this now as a daily driver for a ThinkPad X220. It feels smoother than Windows 10. Your video helped me decide on Fedora. Thank you!
I was on arch with KDE it was cool then I switched to Fedora Gnome feeling like going from the chad distro to nooby distro
But after a week I realized that it s just a great distro. Everything works fine, I don't have to take care of anything.
Now it s my favorite distro I ve installed sway on it s great
The only problem is the installer
They should take ideas from opensuse installer and Yast.
And also I m not a big fan of flatpak they should have borrowed more idea from NixOS when creating silverblue but well it cam still evolved and right now it s one of the greatest distro
And nice business model too so it will last
I been using Fedora for past few weeks.. last 6 months had been distro hopping rolling releases Manjaro, Endeavor, Arch , OpenSUSE tumbleweed and all of them except Tumbleweed broke at some point... Tumbleweed never gave me issues except some missing packages that I was just too lazy to maintain myself thus I moved to Fedora.. love it so far super stable up to date with the lastest Stable software and is great for gaming and productivity.. moving all six of the PCs in my house to Fedora and do not regret it.. it is like you said the new "Ubuntu". Rolling releases have taught me you do not need the bleeding edge to be moving forward and to be frank they are more trouble then they are worth it.. let the people that use them worry about things breaking and maintaining it while we just use our PCs with Fedora haha
They're using it vanilla-like instead of trying to tweak a DE look like something else. Plus, we've got Flatpaks.
Solid comparison between a Ubuntu and Fedora. I discussed Fedora in my July 2019 video where I examined the larger picture and show the switch from Microsoft Windows. Great to see Fedora’s potential realized in today’s discussion.
One good thing about Fedora is it's easy to game with hybrid graphic laptops now with no need for a switcher. Just install Nvidia driver and right click the game and launch using discreet graphics.
Pretty sure that's a gnome thing
Either Gnome or Fedora this sounds awesome. How is battery life on laptops?
@@kevinbreen4510 in general battery life on linux sucks
although I never tested laptops that come pre-installed with linux
@Shen Bapiro I've experienced this myself. I know there are distros working hard to fix the battery issues but I'm curious now if something like system 76 does well since it's pre-installed. Doubtful though.
@@kevinbreen4510 For me Fedora has the best battery life on my laptop out of all distros I've tried
I've been using Fedora 36 for two days now. I'm happy. I had no issue with the install.I'm using Kade Plasma desktop on Fedora.
Having Flatpak as an option for certain applications is good to have, but I prefer "native" packages maintained by my distribution maintainer. The future is not Flatpak, the future is a mix of different technologies including Flatpak.
I recently needed an application, but could not use it in Linux because they only offered a Snap and I do not have Snap enabled on my system and do not plan to. Ah I remember what it was, it was the App from Github to verify my system or something similar. Currently I can't do that, because I do not use official Google store either on my smartphone with an old LineageOS.
When I was looking for a distro to replace Windows with in 2020, I first tried Kubuntu and PopOS, but I encountered some bugs I couldn't live with. Then I tried Fedora 33. It's almost everything I was looking for in an OS (I still cannot fathom why customizing the looks requires so much tinkering).
Now I am using Fedora 39 and I am happy with it. Been using it for gaming and digital art. Really stable.
I went with Fedora Silverblue to try the while immutable Filesystem and sandboxing thing. And it's been pretty awesome so far.
I really like about Fedora that we get the new technologies without being bleeding edge with all the packages and libraries.
I was thinking of going with it. I already install every possible app from flatpak (even replace built in apps with the flatpak version), but what about apps that don't have a flatpak? System apps, some less popular apps like XDM which only have an installation (SH) script. Can silverblue even handle those?
@@ent2220 you have a bunch of tools to address those. For those apps from the repos you need closely integrated into the system, you can use rpm-ostree to layer them on the base image.
For the others, there is always toolbox-containers to run them in, since you have proper dnf and stuff in that to set up all the dependencies
I'm considering trying this as immutable appears to be gaining popularity. Anything that would cause you to switch to mainstream fedora or is everything simple to work with?
@@kevinbreen4510 for me? No. I love it. Everything is neatly compartmentalized or layered, i don't have to worry about the system itself. It just took a bit to get used to, so, the more you are a Poweruser who installs arch from the bare ones base for breakfast, the harder it's probably gonna be.
@@Wrzlprnft the main reason I like flatpak is because it reminds me more of windows. They get installed in var/lib/flatpak and user files go to the .var folder in your home directory. This way every app goes in its own folder. I really don't like the way Linux typically installs things otherwise. Where it puts files in who knows how many folders all over the root directory. Flatpak really is the future
I dont mind the gnome workflow. although not having to hide windows in dock feels weird, it's like reaching for another candybar still holding the first one in your hand, you either eat the hole candybar or throw it away otherwise you have to hold it open in your hand, you cannot hide it into your pocket... but it is an interesting experience nonetheless.
I mind the way gnome is uncustomizable. I mind the gnome onscreen keyboard which lacks arrows and ctrls/alts/shifts. I mind that gnome terminal cannot have a beautiful blurred transparent background and rounded bottom corners of windows :) And I mind the weird way the gnome compositor works which looks as if everything is heavy. every font, button and panel feels heavy, am I the only one having that experience?.
Customization is always a double edged sword. Gnome limits the customization by default because it's trying to be consistent everywhere, the UI, the GTK apps etc. This is the main selling point of what Gnome is and one of the reason I much prefer Gnome over Windows that has tons of legacy GUI that still exists even in W11. The Gnome approach is basically the MacOS approach, they give app developer the tools to easily build apps and which will keep the Gnome design to give the best consistent experience to the user.
On the other hand, you've got KDE which gives you the ultimate power to customize everything for people that want this capability and don't mind if a margin is a bit bigger here and there and if the overall experience is not the best but could be considered the best "for you".
This is the great thing about Linux, there's choice for everyone, but let's not try to make every desktop environment focus on everything and become master of none and with no philosophy behind it.
Been trying the Ubuntu 22.04 development version for a couple of days and have been very pleased with the aesthetics, performance and stability. The user interface and desktop interface are top notch, really beautiful and customizable. Well done for the Ubuntu team. Great LTS release! Congratulations
It's been many, many years since I used Fedora. Going to have a play with it after seeing your video :-)
Just started trying dev builds of Fedora 36 with GNOME 42. Other than the occasional bug that is expected from pre-release software, it’s been absolutely amazing! Fedora 36 polishes up a few things and of course includes all the new features of GNOME 42, which is chocked full of awesome stuff! (I particularly love the new text editor, dynamic light/dark wallpapers, and redesigned overlays for volume / brightness / switching workspaces, but there are so many more new features in it that all feel fresh yet polished.)
You know what? I've been having a lot of trouble with Manjaro recently, especially with updates almost every time I turn my PC on. KDE has also been pretty buggy, it seems, and basic functionally like remembering my desktop layout has just completely broken. The last time I tried Fedora, I accidentally briked it while trying to install Nvidia dirvers, but you've convinced me to give Fedora another go! Cheers
As a Manjaro developer, Fedora is my second choice after Manjaro, and I often follow Fedora development for new ideas for Manjaro gnome.
Check out void its rolling release like manjaro but stable enough for daily use and no systemd
I think Fedora Silverblue is the future of Linux on the desktop.
I flip flop from Fedora and Pop!_OS. I wish Pop would rebase on top of Fedora. Probably won't happen, especially with Pop focusing on their own desktop environment, but one can dream.
I'm sure Cosmic will be available on Fedora once it's a standalone DE
@@TheLinuxEXP Yeah that's a good point.
I distro hop all over, trying different Linux distributions, but I kept coming back to Fedora. It felt the most comfortable to me. I love it! Great review bro.
(ubuntu and arch user) Have just installed Fedora 36 default spin on my Dell XPS, Thanks. I'm enjoying it so far. (First time using Fedora)
As i mentioned a few days ago in one of your previous videos (about ubuntu) Fedora is the most stable and functional distro while i really don't like the anaconda installer. Also Fedora used to focus on Gnome which is great. I like Gnome, but i prefer much more the KDE Plasma Desktop and i would like to see more attention from the Fedora Dev Team on it. I would like also to mention (as addition) about the BTRFS Filesystem. Btrfs is used by default in Fedora since version 33, even though OpenSUSE use it earlier(maybe other distros too), Fedora's adoption made more people to play with it. Somehow the same thing as you told about Wayland. You know i'm very happy to see such video about Fedora on this channel and i really thank you because i believe this video will attrack more people to Fedora.
Does Plasma put as much emphasis on accessibility? The only desktops that will win in the long run are ones that have comprehensive accessibility settings, because without that many people will continue to use desktops that do or continue to use Windows and MacOS for these features instead.
Seriously. After lots of distro hopping, making my own system on arch for a few years....when I checked out Fedora 32 I felt like I found some sort of open secret in the community. Gets out of my way, plenty of support for rpms, current software without being unstable? Fedora's awesome.
How do you feel Fedora compares with openSUSE? I've been using Linux for a little over 2 years and tried just about everything, but these two RPM distros have felt by far the most polished, stable, and mature (maybe because of their roots as professional/workstation distributions?)
I have been using fedora for a while now on my laptop and stock gnome really is amazing on laptops.
The mousepad gestures are something I’d never like to miss
I remember back in 05 when I first tried linux and Fedora and Suse were considered the beginner friendly distros, with Ubuntu being the literally brand new kid on the block, at it's second iteration I think. Nice to see the more things change the more they stay the same ;-P
EDIT. I was with you until you said Ubuntu or ZorinOS don't get the latest Gnome. That's a plus for them and a minus for Fedora. True, Gnome is a minus for all, but it's a smaller minus in the cases of Ubuntu and ZorinOS.
What don’t you like about the latest Gnome? Just the fact that it uses more system resources or something about the interface?
@@walking_on_earth There are 4 types of linux users:
1. People who live in the TTY - we call these people sys admins.
2. People who post images on r/linuxporn - we call these people WM users.
3. People who think that KDE isn't polished enough and who might use something other than KDE because they don't want to spend their day setting KDE up just like they want - we call these people Desktop Linux users.
4. People who think Gnome has too many features and could do with a few being removed - preferably while increasing the memory footprint of Gnome as a whole - we call these people Gnome developers.
Now, to answer your question with another question: why are you a Gnome apologist?
@@AlucardNoir pfffft
I tried fedora for a while back around 18-20, It was a good experience. I switched to CentOS 7 for some very specific reasons (I was training for a Linux admin cert and CentOS is much closer to RedHat enterprise.). Later going to Debian stable for the larger package selection and well supported Xfce. I haven't switched in several years because I don't currently have a second workstation and can't afford an interruption to my workflow. (also why I use Deb stable)
Manjaro was on my old laptop. I liked it, very nice driver and kernel handling utilities, but it had the rare broken updates, mostly due to the old age of my install and the need to shift away from certain legacy dependencies; not unfixable for a knowledgeable admin but certainly would cause problems for a new user.
I've been using Linux Mint for years, but I decided to give Fedora a try a few months ago. The experience has been a mixed bag. It is "stable" in the sense it will not hang your PC, but it's riddled with minor annoyances you can't solve. Some applications will not run on Wayland, and while there's a compatibility layer named "XWayland" that should allow me to run Xorg apps, it's either not included with Fedora, or not working for every app. The inclusion of Flatpak support is more than welcomed. You're probably right about "the default experience", since it's enough for most users. But I'm having difficulties to see the benefits, while the defects are right in front of my face . Bottom line, the title is correct, it's definitely "the new Ubuntu" in the sense of being too edgy, with all the pros and cons.
Been using Fedora for 4 years now. Love it. It’s basically upstream for RHEL and I use RHEL a lot at work so it’s nice to play with the cool new stuff before it’s put in the new builds for RHEL.
THANK YOU for mentioning that Manjaro has ISSUES-- so many pitched a FIT when I said that once... and ebuzz Central-- they had a HUGE fit over that.. but he was RIGHT- it does!!!! I like Manjaro and MABOX- (have the newest and it ooks smoother).. but I'm kinda stuck on MX 21 now--- have a hard time letting it go- and always come right back to it-- because I can use MY CUSTOM ISO and have it running in 5 minutes..
Speaking of new, our sponsor isnt!
That was a silly smooth segway there 😎
I'd love to use it. Last time I tried a Fedora 35 install, I discovered that there's no support for zfs in that version, which is a show-stopper for me.
You use ZFS on your pc as the root file system?
just add the fedora repos from zfs yourself. Fedora does not support it because upstream (linus towarlds/the kernel) does not want to support it for licensing reasons. I must say, I have not tried it because of that, but it should be possible
@@scooter4196 Yes. Works fine with ubuntu/neon/manjaro. The ability to wind back time using zfs snapshots has proved to be invaluable.
Fedora has been my go to for the past couple of years now. Really enjoy using it
Fedora is more stable and more powerful than Ubuntu ever was or could even dream of. New features, no idea. I’m running Fedora 34 with an updated kernel. Everything works and I see no reason to update.
I used Fedora for almost a decade, but shifted to Debian back in 2017. I am now running Manjaro, but I am really glad to hear that Fedora is still awesome.
I totally agree with you , I used Fedora for 3 years on my work laptop and never has any issue.
Is it true Manjaro tends to break a lot ?
I've heard people saying that even Arch is more stable, but I've been using it without issue for two years now. 🤔
I am still at Ubuntu 20.04...next year probably I will change my distro , this video is quite informative..thanks...
Good to see Fedora finally getting the love. Been a Fedora users since core 8. All hail beefy miracle (Fedora 17's name)
I don't like the standard Gnome experience, but it needs few modifications to be usable. I do like this:
1 - I install the "just perfction" extension, and "hot edge".
2 - Using Just perfection I move the panel down, the clock to the right and configure the panel to appear only in the overview, and hide some other things I don't like.
And that's it, a clean environment that you can use with the mouse without depending on the super key.
Fedora is def the best Gnome distro. Its one of my favorites. After a few extensions its about perfect for me.
Interesting video. I was using Fedora a couple of yers ago, now switched to Mac + Kali (Security-related job). So maybe it's time to check Fedora out in a VM. Thanks for the video!
Fedora and Ubuntu, my two most favourite distros...I love ubuntu due to its simplicity and hardware support since several years ago. But Fedora has a special place in me. I know deeper about text mode for the first time when I bought a book contains Fedora tutorials. Not only text mode but also LVM, source codes, etc. It's very important for me to do many things in Linux properly, as all Linux enthusiasts think. I even still save some written notes in text mode to install ATI driver, just for memories not to be typed because hardware support nowadays is far more sophisticated than when ATI graphics were in their gold era back then...
I don’t think you’ll remember this but
a few months back you dropped a fedora video and just a day before that I distributed hopped to pop os or something.
But watching your video craved me to install fedora and it’s been in my laptop ever since!
Before that I used to distort hop literally every week but not anymore!
Thanks to fedora I’ve stopped hopping distros because as you said,”it’s THAT good!”.
As always great video Nick.
❤️
I can only agree with you! Personally, I use Arch linux, but recently a friend (pretty much a computer noob) needed help installing _any_ OS for light office work on their new laptop. Arch wasn't an option as it gets updates too often and tends to break without administration, while Ubuntu gets updates too infrequently and I don't want to be bothered having to upgrade to the newest Ubtuntu release every few months. Also, I just can't stand Canonical since they felt like the proprietary Snap store was a good idea.
Fedora really was the ideal choice - up to date, modern and a vanilla (Gnome) experience, the way my Arch desktop is set up. I just installed a few extensions to help them transition from Windows to Gnome, but that was really it. My friend had this laptop in use for some weeks now and never once complained or came with a question to me - it just works, updates and all included :D
Nice video, as a fedora user since FC2, It is just the feeling, I get from using it
Agreed. Fedora is a really well made Linux distribution that is quite impressive. Some do not like the installer but at least the Fedora installs quick and you should only have to do it once.
Nice video Nick! I made the move about a year ago and have really found the community to be awesome.
I have your outro as my ringtone. You can have never too much of The Linux Experiment.
Thanks for the video. The title looks inspired by the comments from last week’s Ubuntu video.
It was planned before that, but that comment definitely reinforced my opinion:)
I love hearing about your experience with dnf because I'm a Linux Admin, but our servers run CenOS and Fedora, so to me,
dnf is just simple. Meanwhile I run Linux Mint on my iMac for work and PopOS on my Laptop and apt is still something I'm working to learn better.
I just started dabbling in Manjaro and really like it, so going to start now learning pacman now as well 😂