Actually, it's more accurate in high frequency that's why RF engineers use them for aligning IF ccts. DVM meters have a limitation on high frequency due to the A/D converter.
@@ArduGeek6502 That's true but in that case, you need a special High input impedance RF probe for your oscilloscope in high frequencies a normal 10.1probe will load down the cct more than you think. Get a nano VNA and test it.
You really screwed up! You did not turn the middle screw that controls the needle. You should have turned it so that the needle points to zero. As you have it now, it points a couple of small divisions to the right. No wonder you weren't getting accurate readings. Fix the needle so it reads zero when not testing something, and I think you will get better accuracy.
@@ArduGeek6502 Ok, I see what you are saying. I have the same meter and really like it. I set the needle to zero and I get good accuracy. Your meter might be slightly different and may need the change you made to it to increase its accuracy.
@@williamdiffin28 you know i am a human too, make mistakes apologize for that, this meter was probably defect from the factory anyways, video was focused on something else anyways
Actually, it's more accurate in high frequency that's why RF engineers use them for aligning IF ccts. DVM meters have a limitation on high frequency due to the A/D converter.
you're propably right but there is certaint point from which nothing can replace proper oscilloscope
@@ArduGeek6502 That's true but in that case, you need a special High input impedance RF probe for your oscilloscope in high frequencies a normal 10.1probe will load down the cct more than you think. Get a nano VNA and test it.
leaks in capacitors and diodes, usefull
Where made in brother ?
How much ?
video için teşekkür ederim. mt2017 ile mt2019 arasında ne fark vardır? mt2017 ile mt2017n arasındaki fark nedir?
You really screwed up! You did not turn the middle screw that controls the needle. You should have turned it so that the needle points to zero. As you have it now, it points a couple of small divisions to the right. No wonder you weren't getting accurate readings. Fix the needle so it reads zero when not testing something, and I think you will get better accuracy.
if i will do it the multimeter doesnt show exact results, it tuned right now ideally
@@ArduGeek6502 Ok, I see what you are saying. I have the same meter and really like it. I set the needle to zero and I get good accuracy. Your meter might be slightly different and may need the change you made to it to increase its accuracy.
@@sliderulelover I think it is like that, i was trying for hours to calibrate it and this is the best i can do.
@@ArduGeek6502 So why didn't you explain that in your video?
@@williamdiffin28 you know i am a human too, make mistakes apologize for that, this meter was probably defect from the factory anyways, video was focused on something else anyways